BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a pivotal treatment for lymphoma patients. The BeEAM regimen (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) traditionally relies on cryopreservation, whereas the CEM regimen (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan) has been optimized for short-duration administration without the need for cryopreservation. This study rigorously compares the clinical and safety profiles of the BeEAM and CEM regimens.
METHODS: A controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted with 58 lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT at the International Medical Center (IMC) in Cairo, Egypt. Patients were randomly assigned to either the BeEAM (n = 29) or CEM (n = 29) regimen, with an 18-month follow-up period. Clinical and safety outcomes were meticulously compared, focusing on time to engraftment for neutrophils and platelets, side effects, length of hospitalization, transplant-related mortality (TRM), and survival rates.
RESULTS: The findings demonstrate a significant advantage for the CEM regimen. Neutrophil recovery was markedly faster in the CEM group, averaging 8.5 days compared to 14.5 days in the BeEAM group (p < 0.0001). Platelet recovery was similarly expedited, with 11 days in the CEM group versus 23 days in the BeEAM group (p < 0.0001). Hospitalization duration was substantially shorter for CEM patients, averaging 18.5 days compared to 30 days for those on BeEAM (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in the CEM group at 96.55% (95% CI: 84.91-99.44%) compared to 79.31% (95% CI: 63.11-89.75%) in the BeEAM group (p = 0.049). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also notably superior in the CEM group, at 86.21% (95% CI: 86.14-86.28%) versus 62.07% (95% CI: 61.94-62.20%) in the BeEAM group (p = 0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: The CEM regimen might demonstrate superiority over the BeEAM regimen, with faster neutrophil and platelet recovery, reduced hospitalization time, and significantly improved overall and progression-free survival rates. Future studies with longer duration and larger sample sizes are warranted.
BACKGROUND: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the registration number NCT05813132 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05813132 ). (The first submitted registration date: is March 16, 2023).

The prognosis of patients with advanced high-grade (G3) digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is rather poor. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibition to platinum-based chemotherapy may improve survival. NICE-NEC (NCT03980925) is a single-arm, phase II trial that recruited chemotherapy-naive, unresectable advanced or metastatic G3 NENs of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) or unknown origin. Patients received nivolumab 360 mg intravenously (iv) on day 1, carboplatin AUC 5 iv on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d iv on days 1-3, every 3 weeks for up to six cycles, followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for up to 24 months, disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 12-month overall survival (OS) rate (H0 50%, H1 72%, β 80%, α 5%). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. From 2019 to 2021, 37 patients were enrolled. The most common primary sites were the pancreas (37.8%), stomach (16.2%) and colon (10.8%). Twenty-five patients (67.6%) were poorly differentiated carcinomas (NECs) and/or had a Ki67 index >55%. The ORR was 56.8%. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95%CI: 5.1-9) and median OS 13.9 months (95%CI: 8.3-Not reached), with a 12-month OS rate of 54.1% (95%CI: 40.2-72.8) that did not meet the primary endpoint. However, 37.6% of patients were long-term survivors (>2 years). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. There was one treatment-related death. Nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with prolonged survival in over one-third of chemonaïve patients with G3 GEP-NENs, with a manageable safety profile.

Purpose: To study the effects of prior pelvic radiotherapy on bone marrow suppression in recurrent cervical cancer patients during chemotherapy. Methods and materials: The cases of 129 patients with recurrent cervical cancer were reviewed, of which 77 patients had pelvic radiotherapy history and another 52 patients with no pelvic radiotherapy history were used as control group. All patients received a chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel combined with carboplatin (TC) per 21 days for 5-6 times. Hematologic toxicity, including count of red blood cell, white blood cell and neutrophil cell and platelet, was defined by using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). The relationship between age, body mass index, disease free survival, pathological types, FIGO stages, radiotherapy methods and the degree of bone marrow suppression during chemotherapy was statistically analyzed, respectively, for all recurrent cervical cancer patients. Results: Among 77 patients with previous radiotherapy history, 73 recurrent patients (94.8%) had bone marrow suppression followed by chemotherapy. Recurrent cervical cancer patients without prior radiotherapy (n=52) showed a lower risk of bone marrow suppression followed by chemotherapy (n=39, 75.0%, P < 0.05). The probability of severe bone marrow suppression (grade III-IV) after chemotherapy in recurrent cervical patients with or without history of radiotherapy was 41.6% and 13.5%, respectively (P < 0.05). In univariate analysis, radiotherapy methods were associated with the incidence of grade III-IV bone marrow suppression in recurrent cervical cancer patients (P=0.005). In multivariate analysis, radiotherapy methods and extended-field radiotherapy were the risk factor of grade III-IV bone marrow suppression (χ2=16.975, P=0.001). No significant differences in the counts of white blood cell, hemoglobin and platelet were observed before chemotherapy at relapse between patients with and without prior radiotherapy. Reduction of white blood cell counts, absolute value of neutrophil cell and platelet counts composited majority type of grade III and IV bone marrow suppression. Conclusions: The prior pelvic radiotherapy significantly increased the incidence of bone marrow suppression during chemotherapy in recurrent cervical cancer patients. When treating recurrent cervical cancer patients with chemotherapy who had prior radiotherapy, especially for those experienced external beam radiation therapy, essential attention and timely intervention are recommended to ensure completion of chemotherapy and clinical efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Many patients undergo dose reduction or early termination of chemotherapy to reduce chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity, which may increase their risk of survival. However, this strategy may result in underdosing patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the relative dose intensity (RDI) and survival outcomes in patients with LA-ESCC.
METHODS: This retrospective study assessed patients with LA-ESCC (cT2N + M0, cT3-4NanyM0) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) with curative-intent esophagectomy. The patients received 2 courses of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) combination radiotherapy prior to undergoing surgery. During NCRT, RDI was computed, defined as the received dose as a percentage of the standard dose, and the incidence of dose delays was estimated (≥ 7 days in any course cycle). The best RDI cutoff value (0.7) was obtained using ROC curve. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, the treatment effect was measured using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS: We included 132 patients in this study, divided into RDI < 0.7 and RDI ≥ 0.7 groups using cut-off value of 0.7. RDI grade was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced between the groups. There was no evidence that patients with RDI < 0.7 experienced less toxicity or those with RDI ≥ 0.7 resulted in more toxicity. However, patients with RDI < 0.7 who were given reduced doses had a worse overall survival [HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88, P = 0.015]. The risk of a lower RDI increased with a longer dose delay time (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The RDI below 0.7 for avoiding chemoradiotherapy toxicity administration led to a reduction in the dose intensity of treatment and decreased overall survival.

OBJECTIVE: There is no agreed-upon standard option for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC) unfit for cisplatin-based regimens. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to explore alternative options for this population.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases for observational studies and clinical trials (CTs) assessing treatment options for LA HNSCC cisplatin-ineligible patients. This study was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42023483156.
RESULTS: This systematic review included 24 studies (18 observational studies and 6 CTs), comprising 4450 LA HNSCC cisplatin-ineligible patients. Most patients were treated with cetuximab-radiotherapy [RT] (50.3%), followed by carboplatin-RT (31.7%). In seven studies reporting median overall survival (OS) in patients treated with cetuximab-RT, it ranged from 12.8 to 46 months. The median OS was superior to 40 months in two studies assessing carboplatin-RT, and superior to 15 months in two studies assessing RT alone. For other regimens such as nimotuzumab-RT, docetaxel-RT, and carboplatin-RT plus paclitaxel the median OS was 21, 25.5, and 28 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review supports the use of a variety of therapy combinations for LA HNSCC cisplatin-ineligible patients. We highlight the urgent need for clinical studies assessing treatment approaches in this population.

BACKGROUND: Inetetamab is the first domestically developed innovative anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in China, proven effective and safe in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. However, its efficacy and safety in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remain to be validated.
METHODS: This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inetetamab combined with pertuzumab, taxanes, and carboplatin (TCbIP) in neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive LABC, comparing it to data from patients treated with the TCbHP regimen (trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab, taxanes, and carboplatin) using propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was total pathological complete response (tpCR). Adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), and near-pCR were key secondary endpoints.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients with clinical stage IIA-IIIC HER2-positive LABC were prospectively enrolled and treated with the TCbIP regimen. The tpCR rate among 28 patients who completed surgery was 60.7%, comparable to and slightly higher than the TCbHP group in PSM (60.7% vs. 53.6%, P = 0.510). The ORR was 96.4%, and the DCR reached 100.0%. The most common ≥ grade 3 AE was neutropenia (21.4% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.350). No significant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction was observed, and no patient withdrew from treatment due to AEs.
CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy with TCbIP showed good efficacy and safety in patients with HER2-positive LABC and might be another promising option for neoadjuvant treatment.
BACKGROUND: NCT05749016 (registration date: Nov 01, 2021).

BACKGROUND: Carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) have been the standard of care for advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) for many years. However, this chemotherapy combination shows limited efficacy and recurrences often occur in less than 12 months. ABTL0812 is a novel drug that selectively kill cancer cells by cytotoxic autophagy and has shown anticancer efficacy in preclinical models of EC in combination with CP.
METHODS: ENDOLUNG was an open-label, phase 1/2 clinical trial designed to determine the safety and efficacy of Ibrilatazar (ABTL0812) with CP in patients with advanced/recurrent EC and non-irradiable stage III and IV squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sq-NSCLC). The phase 1 part consisted of a 3 + 3 de-escalation design followed by an expansion cohort with 12 patients. The primary endpoint was safety. ABTL0812 starting dose was 1300 mg tid combined with carboplatin at area under the curve (AUC) 5 and paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 both administered every 21 days for up to 8 cycles. The phase 2 part included a total of 51 patients. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and the secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: During the phase 1 only one dose limiting toxicity (DLT), a grade 4 neutropenia, was observed in 1 out of 6 patients, thus no de-escalation was applied. One additional DLT, a grade 3 febrile neutropenia, was observed in the expansion cohort, thus the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for ABTL0812 was established at 1300 mg tid. Most frequent hematological adverse events (AE) of the combination were neutropenia (52.9%), anemia (37.3%) and thrombocytopenia (19.6%). Nausea (66.7%), asthenia (66.7%), diarrhea (54.9%) and vomiting (54.9%) were the most frequent non-hematological adverse events (AEs). The combination of ABTL0812 plus CP showed an ORR of 65.8% (13.2% complete response and 52.6% partial response) with a median DOR of 7.4 months (95% CI: 6.3-10.8 months). Median PFS was 9.8 months (95% CI: 6.6-10.6) and median OS 23.6 months (95% CI 6.4-ND). Pharmacokinetic parameters were compatible with target engagement observed in preclinical studies, and blood pharmacodynamic biomarkers indicated sustained target regulation during, at least, 28 days after starting the treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the combination of ABTL0812 with CP is safe and feasible with an encouraging activity in patients with advanced/recurrent EC. Our data warrant further confirmation in prospective randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: EU Clinical Trial Register, EudraCT number 2016-001352-21 and National Clinical Trials Number, NCT03366480. Registration on 19 September 2016.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant treatment is the standard treatment in locally advanced ESCC. However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen is not known.
METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cohort study conducted with propensity score matching. Patients with resectable ESCC from 13 tertiary centers from Türkiye were screened between January 2011 and December 2021. We compared the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with the CF and the CROSS regimens in patients with ESCC.
RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-two patients were screened. Patients who received induction chemotherapy (n = 72) and CROSS-ineligible (n = 31) were excluded. Two hundred and fifty nine patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. After propensity score matching (n = 97 in both groups), the mPFS was 18.4 months (95% CI, 9.3-27.4) and 25.7 months (95% CI, 15.6-35.7; p = 0.974), and the mOS was 35.2 months (95% CI, 18.9-51.5) and 39.6 months (95% CI 20.1-59.2; p = 0.534), in the CF and the CROSS groups, respectively. There was no difference between subgroups regarding PFS and OS. Compared with the CF group, the CROSS group had a higher incidence of neutropenia (34.0% vs. 62.9%, p < 0.001) and anemia (54.6% vs. 75.3%, p = 0.003) in all grades. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in grade 3-4 anemia, grade 3-4 neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia between groups. There were more dose reductions and dose delays in the CROSS group than in the CF group (11.3% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.026 and 34.0% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.009, respectively). The resection rate was 52.6% in the CF-RT and 35.1% in the CROSS groups (p = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: Favorable PFS and pCR rates and a comparable OS were obtained with the CROSS regimen over the CF regimen as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with ESCC.

With the success of immunotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) is being increasingly used for local staged esophageal cancer, especially in the context of clinical trials, which brings similar pCR with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and shows promising results. However, there is still a part of potentially operable patients can\'t undergo surgery after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. The follow-up treatment and prognosis of this population remain unclear. Patients pathologically diagnosed with ESCC, clinical stage T1-3N+M0 or T3-4aNanyM0 (AJCC 8th), PS 0-1 were retrospectively enrolled from 1/2020 to 6/2021 in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. All patients firstly received PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (albumin paclitaxel, 260 mg/m2 on day 1 plus carboplatin AUC = 5 on day 1) every 3 weeks for 2-4 cycles. For those patients who did not receive surgery, definitive radiotherapy with 50.4 Gy/28F or 50 Gy/25F was adopted using VMAT, concurrent with chemotherapy or alone. The concurrent chemotherapy regimens included weekly TC (paclitaxel 50 mg/m2, d1, carboplatin AUC = 2, d1) or S1 (60 mg bid d1-14, 29-42). The survival outcomes and treatment toxicity were recorded and analyzed. A total of 56 eligible patients were finally identified from 558 patients who were treated in department of thoracic surgery, among all the patients, 25 (44.6%) received radiotherapy alone, and 31 (55.4%) received chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant CIT. The median follow-up was 20.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 8.7-27 months). The median PFS and OS were 17.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.0-21.9 months) and 20.5 months (95% CI 11.8-27.9 months), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the median OS was 26.3 months (95% CI 15.33-NA) for patients exhibiting partial response (PR) to CIT, compared to 17 months (95% CI 8.77-26.4) for those with stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD), yielding a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54 (95% CI 0.27-1.06, P = 0.07). No significant difference was observed for patients received radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy with HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.72-2.6, P = 0.33). The most common Adverse events (AEs) observed during this study were anemia (98.2%), leukopenia (83.9%), thrombocytopenia (53.6%). AEs of grade ≥ 3 radiation-induced pneumonitis and esophagitis were 12.5% and 32.1%, especially, 6 patients (10.7%) died from esophageal fistula and 2 patients (3.6%) died from grade 5 pneumonitis. For local advanced ESCC patients after neoadjuvant CIT who did not receive surgery, definitive radiotherapy was an optional treatment strategy. However, those patients with no response to CIT also showed poor response to radiotherapy, and particular attention should be paid to treatment related toxicity, especially esophageal fistula.

This open-label, non-comparative, 2:1 randomized, phase II trial (NCT03275506) in women with stage IIIC/IV high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) for whom upfront complete resection was unachievable assessed whether adding pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) to standard-of-care carboplatin plus paclitaxel yielded a complete resection rate (CRR) of at least 50%. Postoperatively patients continued assigned treatment for a maximum of 2 years. Postoperative bevacizumab was optional. The primary endpoint was independently assessed CRR at interval debulking surgery. Secondary endpoints were Completeness of Cytoreduction Index (CCI) and peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores, objective and best response rates, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, postoperative morbidity, and pathological complete response. The CRR in 61 pembrolizumab-treated patients was 74% (one-sided 95% CI = 63%), exceeding the prespecified ≥50% threshold and meeting the primary objective. The CRR without pembrolizumab was 70% (one-sided 95% CI = 54%). In the remaining patients CCI scores were ≥3 in 27% of the standard-of-care group and 18% of the investigational group and CC1 in 3% of the investigational group. PCI score decreased by a mean of 9.6 in the standard-of-care group and 10.2 in the investigational group. Objective response rates were 60% and 72%, respectively, and best overall response rates were 83% and 90%, respectively. Progression-free survival was similar with the two regimens (median 20.8 versus 19.4 months in the standard-of-care versus investigational arms, respectively) but overall survival favored pembrolizumab-containing therapy (median 35.3 versus 49.8 months, respectively). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events with pembrolizumab-containing therapy were anemia during neoadjuvant therapy and infection/fever postoperatively. Pembrolizumab was discontinued prematurely because of adverse events in 23% of pembrolizumab-treated patients. Combining pembrolizumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible for HGSC considered not completely resectable; observed activity in some subgroups justifies further evaluation to improve understanding of the role of immunotherapy in HGSC.