carboplatin

卡铂
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:对于不适合以顺铂为基础的局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LAHNSCC)治疗方案的患者,尚无公认的标准选择。因此,我们进行了系统评价,以探索该人群的替代选择.
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,科克伦,和Embase数据库,用于评估LAHNSCC顺铂不合格患者的治疗方案的观察性研究和临床试验(CT)。本研究在PROSPERO注册,编号为CRD42023483156。
    结果:本系统综述包括24项研究(18项观察性研究和6项CT),包括4450名LAHNSCC顺铂不合格患者。大多数患者接受西妥昔单抗放疗[RT](50.3%),其次是卡铂RT(31.7%)。在7项报告接受西妥昔单抗-RT治疗的患者的中位总生存期(OS)的研究中,时间为12.8至46个月。在两项评估卡铂-RT的研究中,中位OS优于40个月,在两项单独评估RT的研究中,优于15个月。对于其他方案,如尼妥珠单抗-RT,多西他赛-RT,卡铂-RT联合紫杉醇的中位OS分别为21、25.5和28个月,分别。
    结论:我们的系统评价支持对LAHNSCC顺铂不合格患者使用多种治疗组合。我们强调迫切需要评估该人群的治疗方法的临床研究。
    OBJECTIVE: There is no agreed-upon standard option for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC) unfit for cisplatin-based regimens. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to explore alternative options for this population.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases for observational studies and clinical trials (CTs) assessing treatment options for LA HNSCC cisplatin-ineligible patients. This study was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42023483156.
    RESULTS: This systematic review included 24 studies (18 observational studies and 6 CTs), comprising 4450 LA HNSCC cisplatin-ineligible patients. Most patients were treated with cetuximab-radiotherapy [RT] (50.3%), followed by carboplatin-RT (31.7%). In seven studies reporting median overall survival (OS) in patients treated with cetuximab-RT, it ranged from 12.8 to 46 months. The median OS was superior to 40 months in two studies assessing carboplatin-RT, and superior to 15 months in two studies assessing RT alone. For other regimens such as nimotuzumab-RT, docetaxel-RT, and carboplatin-RT plus paclitaxel the median OS was 21, 25.5, and 28 months, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review supports the use of a variety of therapy combinations for LA HNSCC cisplatin-ineligible patients. We highlight the urgent need for clinical studies assessing treatment approaches in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    子宫内膜癌是最广泛的妇科癌症,随着发病率和死亡率的增加。Pembrolizumab,一种靶向PD1受体肿瘤的单克隆抗体,已批准用于微卫星不稳定性高(MSI-H)实体瘤患者。已经进行了许多临床试验和观察性研究,以评估Lenvatinib和Pembrolizumab联合治疗子宫内膜癌的安全性和有效性。然而,结果不一致,目前的数据是基于异质群体。主要目的是评估Lenvatinib联合Pembrolizumab治疗子宫内膜癌的安全性和有效性。
    从一开始就从四个数据库进行搜索;PubMed,谷歌学者,Cochrane图书馆,和ClinicalTrials.gov.电子数据库搜索从开始到2023年8月20日进行。
    我们考虑了随机对照试验和单臂观察研究,即队列,病例对照和横断面研究。
    我们进行了单臂荟萃分析,涉及7项研究,最终纳入495例子宫内膜癌患者,其结果如下:完全缓解,部分响应,无进展生存,疾病稳定,进行性疾病,安全结果,不良事件,以及死亡总数。
    我们的结果显示,88.6%的患者为非MSI-H/pMMR肿瘤阳性(95%CI=0.825-0.927),而6.5%(95%CI=3.8-9.8%)的患者为MSI-H/dMMR肿瘤。使用Lenvatinib和Pembrolizumab治疗的子宫内膜癌患者的汇总客观反应为36.5%(95%CI=0.258-0.471),完全缓解和部分缓解的汇总估计值分别为47%(95%CI=0.024~0.070)和31.3%(95%CI=0.230~0.396).38.2%患者病情稳定(95%CI=0.329-0.435),24.0%患者病情进展(95%CI=0.103-0.378)。合并的中位无进展生存期为5.97(95%CI5.43-7.63)个月,而中位总生存期为17.19个月(95%CI15.34-19.31).在治疗期间,所有级别的不良事件发生率为85%,3级或更严重的不良事件发生率为39%,而在治疗期间死亡发生率为23.8%。
    这项荟萃分析的结果得出结论,尽管Lenvatinib和Pembrolizumab的联合治疗的PFS和OS低于用于治疗晚期和复发性子宫内膜癌的标准治疗,它仍然是一种新颖的治疗方法,并显示出具有更大样本量的进一步研究潜力。
    UNASSIGNED: Endometrial carcinoma is the most widespread gynecological cancer, with increasing morbidity and mortality. Pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets PD1 receptor tumors, is approved for patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) solid tumors. Many clinical trials and observational studies have been conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab combination therapy in the setting of endometrial cancer. However, results have been inconsistent, and current data is based on a heterogeneous population. The primary objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for endometrial cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: The search was conducted from inception from four databases; PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The electronic database search was conducted from inception to August 20, 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: We considered randomized controlled trials and single-arm observational studies, i.e. cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a single-arm meta-analysis, involving 7 studies having a total of 495 patients with endometrial cancer were eventually included which had the following outcomes: Complete response, Partial response, Progression-free survival, stable disease, progressive disease, safety outcomes, Adverse events, and the total number of deaths.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results showed that 88.6 % of the patients were positive for non-MSI-H/pMMR tumors (95 % CI = 0.825-0.927) whereas 6.5 % (95 % CI = 3.8-9.8 %) of the patients for MSI-H/dMMR tumors. The pooled objective response of endometrial cancer patients treated with Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab was 36.5 % (95 % CI = 0.258-0.471), the pooled estimate of complete and partial response was 47 % (95 % CI = 0.024-0.070) and 31.3 % (95 % CI = 0.230-0.396). 38.2 % patients had stable disease (95 % CI = 0.329-0.435) and 24.0 % patients had progressive disease (95 % CI = 0.103-0.378). The pooled median progression-free survival was 5.97 (95 % CI 5.43-7.63) months and, whereas the median overall survival was 17.19 months (95 % CI 15.34-19.31). All grade adverse events occurred in 85 % and Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 39 % of patients during the therapy whereas death occurred in 23.8 % during the treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The results of this meta-analysis concludes that although the combined treatment of a Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab had a PFS and OS that was inferior to the standard therapy used to treat advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer, it is still a novel treatment and shows potential for further research with a greater sample size.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    简介:铂和派姆单抗的联合治疗看起来像是晚期非小细胞肺癌的有希望的治疗方法。然而,铂类化疗和派博利珠单抗均可导致AKI.AKI可由于急性肾小管坏死或间质性肾炎而发生。确定导致肾脏损害的药物至关重要。为此,我们使用了新的免疫组织化学标记(p53和抗PD1分析).病例描述:一名77岁女性晚期非小细胞肺癌患者接受了PD-1抑制剂派姆单抗和铂类化疗卡铂。病人,60天后,有经验的AKI。做了肾活检,并采用了两种新的p53(来自铂的ATN的实验标记)和抗PDL1(PD-1抑制剂肾炎的实验标记)的免疫组织化学技术。肾活检显示严重的肾小管损伤。没有检测到浸润,PDL-1的免疫组织化学评估为阴性。p53表达阳性。肾活检提示铂类诱导的急性肾小管坏死。停用类固醇并减少卡铂后,患者继续使用pembrolizumab,肾功能在两个月内恢复正常.讨论:联合使用检查点抑制剂和铂类治疗可能会导致AKI。检查肾脏组织的标准方法可能无法提供有关这些药物对肾脏影响的足够信息。为了解决这个问题,我们建议纳入对PDL1和p53表达分析的评估.这种个性化的方法将有助于确定患者的最佳治疗方案,同时确保最佳的癌症治疗计划。
    Introduction: The combination therapy of platinum and pembrolizumab looks like a promising treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, both platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab can lead to AKI. AKI can occur due to acute tubular necrosis or interstitial nephritis. It is essential to identify the drug responsible for renal damage. For this purpose, we used new immunohistochemistry markers (p53 and anti-PD1 analysis). Case Description: A 77-year-old female patient with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer received the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy carboplatin. The patient, after 60 days, experienced AKI. A kidney biopsy was performed, and two new immunohistochemical techniques for p53 (experimental markers of ATN from platinum) and anti-PDL1 (experimental markers of PD-1 inhibitors nephritis) were employed. Renal biopsies revealed severe tubular damage. No infiltration was detected, and the immunohistochemical assessment of PDL-1 was negative. The expression of p53 was positive. The renal biopsy suggested platinum-induced acute tubular necrosis. After discontinuing steroids and reducing carboplatin, the patient continued with pembrolizumab, and their renal function returned to normal within two months. Discussion: Combining checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based therapies may result in AKI. The standard method of examining kidney tissue may not provide sufficient information about the effects of these drugs on the kidneys. To address this issue, we recommend incorporating an assessment of the analysis of the expression of PDL1 and p53. This personalized approach will help identify the best treatment option for the patient while ensuring the best possible cancer treatment plan.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:有多种新辅助治疗方案,包括用于三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的铂类药物,每个都有不同的安全特征,结果,病理完全缓解率(pCR%)。我们进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以比较不同铂类新辅助CT治疗TNBC的疗效和安全性。
    方法:书目数据库(PubMed,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆)从成立之初到2022年10月31日进行了搜索。符合条件的研究是随机临床试验,评估了在TNBC的标准新辅助CT中添加卡铂或顺铂。主要终点是pCR率和DFS/EFS,次要终点是(G)3-4级血液学毒性和OS。
    结果:确定了13项试验,涉及3154例患者,比较了6种治疗方法(卡铂AUC5,卡铂AUC6,卡铂AUC2,卡铂AUC1.5,顺铂75mg/m2和标准蒽环类和/或紫杉烷的CT)。基于新辅助CT最有效的治疗方法,卡铂AUC2与pCR%改善最小(RR,1.49;95CI,1.23,1.8),卡铂AUC6与pCR%改善相似(RR1.58,95CI,1.35,1.84),卡铂AUC5与pCR%改善最高(RR2.23,95CI,1.6,32).当添加到新辅助CT时,与DFS最显著改善相关的治疗是卡铂AUC5(HR0.36,95CI0.18,0.73)。它也优于AUC6和AUC2(HR=0.45,95CI0.21-0.96和HR=0.48,95CI0.23-0.98)。所有时间表在操作系统方面都表现出相似的结果;然而,与无铂臂相比,只有AUC2表现出显着改善。中性粒细胞减少症,血小板减少症,卡铂AUC6显著增加贫血G3-4。
    结论:基于此网络荟萃分析,与其他卡铂剂量相比,标准新辅助CT中添加卡铂AUC5可提供显著的pCR和DFS获益,且毒性风险较低.
    BACKGROUND: There are multiple neoadjuvant regimens, including platinum agents for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), each with a different safety profile, outcome, and pathologic complete response rate (pCR%). We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of different platinum-based neoadjuvant CT treatments for TNBC.
    METHODS: Bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched from their inception to October 31, 2022. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that evaluated the addition of carboplatin or cisplatin to standard neoadjuvant CT for TNBC. The primary endpoints were pCR rates and DFS/EFS, while the secondary endpoints were grade (G)3-4 hematological toxicity and OS.
    RESULTS: Thirteen trials involving 3154 patients comparing six treatments (carboplatin AUC 5, carboplatin AUC 6, carboplatin AUC 2, carboplatin AUC 1.5, cisplatin 75 mg/m2, and standard anthracycline-and/or taxane-based CT) were identified. Based on the most effective treatments added to neoadjuvant CT, carboplatin AUC 2 was associated with the least improvement in pCR% (RR, 1.49; 95%CI, 1.23, 1.8), carboplatin AUC 6 was associated with similar improvement in pCR% (RR 1.58, 95%CI, 1.35, 1.84) and carboplatin AUC 5 with the highest improvement in pCR% (RR 2.23, 95%CI, 1.6,32). The treatment associated with the most considerable improvement in DFS when added to neoadjuvant CT was carboplatin AUC 5 (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.18, 0.73). It was also better than AUC 6 and AUC 2 (HR= 0.45, 95%CI 0.21-0.96 and HR=0.48, 95%CI 0.23-0.98). All schedules exhibited similar outcomes in terms of OS; however, only AUC 2 demonstrated a significant improvement compared to the no-platinum arms. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia G3-4 were significantly increased by carboplatin AUC 6.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on this network meta-analysis, carboplatin AUC 5 added to standard neoadjuvant CT may provide substantial pCR and DFS benefits with a low toxicity risk compared to other carboplatin doses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    卵巢癌,作为一种常见的妇科癌症,保证治疗是有效的和良好的耐受性。经过广泛的药物测试,紫杉醇联合铂类药物,如顺铂/卡铂和紫杉烷类药物,已经显示出对晚期卵巢癌有希望的结果。我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较两种治疗方案对晚期卵巢癌的疗效:顺铂/紫杉醇和卡铂/紫杉醇。PubMed(Medline),科学直接,和Cochrane图书馆从成立到2023年3月进行了搜索。荟萃分析包括经组织学验证的国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)IIB至IV期卵巢癌患者,他们接受了卡铂/紫杉醇或顺铂/紫杉醇。主要结果是无进展生存期(PFS),总生存期(OS),生活质量(QOL),完全反应率(CRR),和部分反应率(PRR)。修订后的Cochrane偏差风险工具2.0用于评估随机对照试验的质量。为该统计分析选择的五个随机对照试验共2239名参与者。其中1109人接受紫杉醇/顺铂治疗,其余1130人接受卡铂/紫杉醇治疗。在所有包括的结果中,这些报告了重要的发现:QoL(p值=0.0002),血小板减少症(p=<0.00001),神经毒性(p值=0.003),恶心/呕吐(p值=<0.00001),肌痛/关节痛(p值=0.02),和发热性中性粒细胞减少症(p值=0.01)。我们得出的结论是,与顺铂/紫杉醇联合用药相比,卡铂/紫杉醇双联用药赋予患者更好的生活质量(QOL),同时胃肠道和神经系统毒性明显减少。然而,卡铂/紫杉醇的骨髓抑制作用仍然是一个值得关注的问题,可能需要临床治疗.
    Ovarian cancer, being one of the prevalent gynecological cancers, warrants a therapy that\'s both effective and well tolerated. After extensive drug testing, combination regimens with paclitaxel plus platinum-based agents such as cisplatin/carboplatin and taxanes, have shown promising results for advanced ovarian cancer. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of two treatment regimens for advanced ovarian cancer: cisplatin/paclitaxel and carboplatin/paclitaxel.  PubMed (Medline), Science Direct, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2023. The meta-analysis included patients with histologically verified International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IIB to IV ovarian carcinoma who received either carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/paclitaxel. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL), complete response rate (CRR), and partial response rate (PRR). The revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 was used to assess the quality of the RCTs The five RCTs chosen for this statistical analysis consisted of a total of 2239 participants, with 1109 receiving paclitaxel/cisplatin for treatment and the remaining 1130 receiving carboplatin/paclitaxel. Among all included outcomes, these reported significant findings: QoL (p-value=0.0002), thrombocytopenia (p=<0.00001), neurological toxicity (p-value=0.003), nausea/vomiting (p-value=<0.00001), myalgia/arthralgia (p-value=0.02), and febrile neutropenia (p-value=0.01). We concluded that the carboplatin/paclitaxel doublet endows a better quality of life (QOL) to patients along with significantly fewer gastrointestinal and neurological toxicities when compared with the cisplatin/paclitaxel combination. However, the myelosuppressive effects of carboplatin/paclitaxel remain a point of concern and may require clinical management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:紫杉醇和卡铂是治疗晚期或复发子宫内膜癌的标准化疗药物。然而,在化疗中加入程序性细胞死亡1(PD-1)/程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂的益处尚不清楚.
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Scopus,科克伦,和WebofScience数据库,用于研究PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合卡铂和紫杉醇与卡铂和紫杉醇在原发性晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌中的随机对照试验。我们计算了二元终点的风险比(HR)或风险比(RR),95%置信区间(CI)。我们对所有端点使用了DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型。使用I2统计学评估异质性。R,版本4.2.3用于统计分析。
    结果:共纳入3项研究和1,431例患者。与卡铂联合紫杉醇化疗相比,在错配修复缺陷亚组中,无进展生存期(PFS)率(HR0.32;95%CI0.23~0.44;p<0.001)和30个月时的总生存期(OS)(RR3.13;95%CI1.26~7.78;p=0.01)显著有利于PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂+卡铂和紫杉醇组.然而,30个月时,错配修复能力亚组的PFS(HR0.74;95%CI0.50-1.08;p=0.117)或OS(RR2.24;95%CI0.79-6.39;p=0.13)无显著差异.
    结论:免疫治疗联合卡铂-紫杉醇可显著增加晚期或复发子宫内膜癌患者的PFS和OS,在错配修复缺陷和高微卫星不稳定性群体中具有显著的益处。
    BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel and carboplatin is the standard chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. However, the benefit of adding programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors to chemotherapy is still unclear.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials that investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We computed hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models for all endpoints. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analyses.
    RESULTS: A total of three studies and 1,431 patients were included. Compared with carboplatin plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) rate (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.23-0.44; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) at 30 months (RR 3.13; 95% CI 1.26-7.78; p = 0.01) were significant in favor of the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel group in the mismatch repair-deficient subgroup. However, there were no significant differences in the mismatch repair-proficient subgroup for PFS (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.50-1.08; p = 0.117) or OS at 30 months (RR 2.24; 95% CI 0.79-6.39; p = 0.13).
    CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy plus carboplatin-paclitaxel increased significantly PFS and OS among patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, with a significant benefit in the mismatch repair-deficient and high microsatellite instability population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:耳毒性是铂类化疗的常见致残副作用。这项研究旨在评估成人癌症患者铂诱导的耳毒性治疗的证据。
    方法:截至2022年11月1日,检索了四个数据库。如果他们报道了预防或治疗成人铂耳毒性的药物或非药物干预措施,则包括原始研究。文章质量通过两个分级量表进行评估。
    结果:分析了19项随机对照试验和5项准实验研究,共1673例患者。确定了11项干预措施,九种药理学和两种非药理学。六项干预措施(硫代硫酸钠,皮质激素,舍曲林,他汀类药物,多种维生素和D-蛋氨酸)在预防顺铂诱导的耳毒性方面表现出温和的益处。只有一项试验评估了皮质激素作为一种潜在的治疗方法。总的来说,只有6项试验被认为偏倚风险较低.大多数研究没有充分记录干预相关的不良反应,从而限制了安全结论。
    结论:目前的干预措施在预防成人癌症患者顺铂诱导的耳毒性方面有轻微的益处。硫代硫酸钠作为预防策略是最有前途的干预措施。严谨,高质量的研究是有必要的,包括对所有潜在症状和创新治疗方式的评估。
    OBJECTIVE: Ototoxicity is a common disabling side effect of platinum-based chemotherapy. This study aimed to assess the evidence on the management of platinum-induced ototoxicity in adult cancer patients.
    METHODS: Four databases were searched up to 1 November 2022. Original studies were included if they reported on a pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic intervention to prevent or treat platinum ototoxicity in adults. The articles\' quality was assessed via two grading scales.
    RESULTS: Nineteen randomised controlled trials and five quasi-experimental studies with 1673 patients were analysed. Eleven interventions were identified, nine pharmacological and two non-pharmacological. Six of the interventions (sodium thiosulphate, corticoids, sertraline, statins, multivitamins and D-methionine) showed mild benefits in preventing cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Only one trial assessed corticoids as a potential treatment. Overall, only six trials were deemed with a low risk of bias. The majority of studies inadequately documented intervention-related adverse effects, thereby limiting safety conclusions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Current interventions have mild benefits in preventing cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in adult cancer patients. Sodium thiosulphate is the most promising intervention as a preventive strategy. Rigorous, high-quality research is warranted, encompassing an evaluation of all potential symptoms and innovative treatment modalities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    Tumors of various sizes and locations can create a treatment dilemma in achieving adequate surgical margins when sufficient free tissue is not available for closure. Extravascular local adjunctive chemotherapy has been investigated clinically to aid in achieving local tumor control in animals with naturally occurring neoplastic disease. Local chemotherapy can be an alternative primary or a local adjunctive treatment.
    This is a summary of relevant findings of in vitro and in vivo studies on local chemotherapeutic delivery through carrier media, together with a summary of outcomes of clinical use of local delivery of chemotherapeutic agents in small animals and Equidae. Literature from 1990 to 2022 was evaluated via searches of PubMed, Google Scholar, and CAB Abstracts databases for studies of local extravascular delivery of chemotherapeutic agents and chemotherapeutic-impregnated delivery systems in research and clinical settings in veterinary medicine.
    Chemotherapeutic-impregnated calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads with carboplatin are currently favored for extravascular delivery and are associated with minimal wound complications. The ideal delivery system may vary depending on the chemotherapeutic agent used, commercial availability, targeted tumor type, and location.
    Future investigations might focus on the required dose, the rate of sustained release, and enhancing nodal uptake.
    Examen des systèmes d’administration extravasculaire locaux d’agents chimiothérapeutiques chez les petits animaux et les chevaux.
    Des tumeurs de tailles et emplacements différents peuvent créer un dilemme thérapeutique pour obtenir des marges chirurgicales adéquates lorsqu’il n’y a pas suffisamment de tissu libre disponible pour la fermeture. La chimiothérapie d’appoint extravasculaire locale a été étudiée cliniquement pour aider à obtenir une limitation locale de la tumeur chez les animaux atteints d’une maladie néoplasique naturelle. La chimiothérapie locale peut être une alternative primaire ou un traitement local d’appoint.
    Il s’agit d’un résumé des résultats pertinents d’études in vitro et in vivo sur l’administration locale de chimiothérapie par le biais de transporteurs, ainsi que d’un résumé des résultats de l’utilisation clinique de l’administration locale d’agents chimiothérapeutiques chez les petits animaux et les équidés. La littérature de 1990 à 2022 a été évaluée via des recherches dans les bases de données PubMed, Google Scholar et CAB Abstracts pour des études sur l’administration extravasculaire locale d’agents chimiothérapeutiques et de systèmes d’administration chimiothérapeutiques imprégnés dans des contextes de recherche et cliniques en médecine vétérinaire.
    Les billes de sulfate de calcium hémihydratée chimiothérapeutique imprégnées de carboplatine sont actuellement privilégiées pour l’administration extravasculaire et sont associées à des complications minimes des plaies. Le système d’administration idéal peut varier en fonction de l’agent chimiothérapeutique utilisé, de la disponibilité commerciale, du type de tumeur ciblé et de l’emplacement.
    Les recherches futures pourraient se concentrer sur la dose requise, le taux de libération prolongée et l’amélioration de l’absorption nodale.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:FIGO阶段IB3-IIA2的局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)的特征是局部肿块大,预后和生存率较差。LACC对新辅助化疗的肿瘤反应,用作代理端点,迫切需要改进。鉴于抗肿瘤免疫反应可以通过编程死亡-1轴抑制,新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗的治疗模式已被探索为多种实体癌的预后治疗方法之一。到目前为止,sintilimab的应用,一种国内免疫检查点抑制剂,联合新辅助化疗在LACC中仍然有限,尤其是在大的病变中。
    方法:我们介绍了3名绝经后妇女诊断为FIGO期IB3-IIA2宫颈鳞状细胞癌,病变大于5cm。人口统计,临床,组织病理学,记录实验室和影像学数据.在紫杉醇联合卡铂联合辛替利玛的新辅助治疗完成后,所有患者均接受子宫切除术.新辅助治疗后,病例1为病理性完全反应,病例2和病例3为部分反应,在16~22个月的随访期间,无一例患者出现复发.
    结论:本报告提供了支持sintilimab联合新辅助化疗治疗宫颈癌的证据。这还没有在前瞻性研究中得到验证。需要更多的临床数据来验证联合方案的有效性。本文献综述还收集了涉及NACT和免疫治疗反应的潜在预测因子的研究。这将有助于对患者进行分层,以进行未来的试验。
    BACKGROUND: The locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) of FIGO stage IB3-IIA2 is characterized by large local mass, poor prognosis and survival rate. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for LACC, utilized as a surrogate endpoint, is urgently needed to improve. Given that the antitumor immune response can be suppressed by programed death-1 axis, the treatment paradigm of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has been explored as one of the prognostic treatments in a variety of solid carcinoma. So far, the application of sintilimab, a domestic immune checkpoint inhibitor, combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is still limited in LACC, especially in large lesions.
    METHODS: We present three postmenopausal women diagnosed with FIGO stage IB3-IIA2 cervical squamous cell carcinoma with lesions larger than 5 cm. Demographic, clinical, histopathological, laboratory and imaging data were record. At the completion of the neoadjuvant therapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin combined with sintilimab, all patients underwent hysterectomy. After neoadjuvant treatment, a pathologic complete response in case 1 and partial responses in case 2 and case 3 were achieved, and neither patient showed any relapse during the follow-up period of 16 to 22 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: This report provide evidence to support the combination of sintilimab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer, which has yet to be validated in prospective studies. More clinical data are needed to verify the effectiveness of the combined regimens. This literature review also collected studies involving potential predictors of response to NACT and immunotherapy, which would be helpful in stratifying patients for future trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:检测乳腺癌基因1/2(BRCA)的突变已成为临床医生的新决策工具。具有致病性BRCA突变的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者可以受益于聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)和铂治疗,而突变对卡巴他赛和前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)-配体治疗敏感性的影响目前尚不清楚.
    目的:为了评估PARPi的疗效,铂金,卡巴他赛,和PSMA-配体治疗BRCA阳性mCRPC。
    方法:数据库在2022年2月进行了查询。我们通过使用比例和个体患者数据进行数据合成。对于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反应率(从基线[PSA50]下降≥50%)评估,我们将事件发生率与95%置信区间(CI)合并。使用混合效应Cox比例风险模型和单臂随机效应分析对个体患者数据进行无进展(PFS)和总体(OS)生存分析。提供汇集的中位数。
    结果:我们纳入了23项符合条件的研究,共901例BRCA阳性mCRPC患者。PARPi和铂的PSA50反应率为69%(CI:53-82%),和74%(CI:49-90%),分别。OS数据分析显示PARPi和铂类治疗之间没有差异(风险比:0.86;CI:0.49-1.52;p=0.6)。单臂OS和PFS分析揭示了不同PARPis之间的相似性;合并的PFS和OS中位数分别为9.7mo(CI:8.1-12.5)和17.4mo(CI:12.7-20.1),分别。
    结论:我们的数据显示不同的PARPis在PFS和OS方面同样有效。此外,我们发现PARPi和铂类药物在PSA50反应率和OS方面具有可比性,强调铂是BRCA阳性mCRPC患者的有效治疗选择。然而,比较这些药物的前瞻性干预研究对于提供更高水平的证据至关重要。
    结果:在本报告中,我们发现,不同的聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂具有相似的疗效,铂是BRCA阳性转移性去势耐药前列腺癌患者的有效治疗选择.
    BACKGROUND: Testing for mutations in Breast Cancer Gene 1/2 (BRCA) has emerged as a novel decision-making tool for clinicians. Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harboring pathogenic BRCA mutations can benefit from poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and platinum treatments, whereas the impact of the mutation on sensitivity to cabazitaxel and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligand therapy is currently unknown.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of PARPi, platinum, cabazitaxel, and PSMA-ligand therapies in BRCA-positive mCRPC.
    METHODS: Databases were queried in February 2022. We performed data synthesis by using both proportional and individual patient data. For prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (≥50% decrease from baseline [PSA50]) evaluation, we pooled event rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival analyses with individual patient data were performed with the mixed-effect Cox proportional hazard model and single-arm random-effect analysis, providing pooled medians.
    RESULTS: We included 23 eligible studies with 901 BRCA-positive mCRPC patients. PSA50 response rates for PARPi and platinum were 69% (CI: 53-82%), and 74% (CI: 49-90%), respectively. Analyses of OS data showed no difference between PARPi and platinum treatments (hazard ratio: 0.86; CI: 0.49-1.52; p = 0.6). The single-arm OS and PFS analyses revealed similarities among different PARPis; pooled PFS and OS medians were 9.7 mo (CI: 8.1-12.5) and 17.4 mo (CI: 12.7-20.1), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed that different PARPis were similarly effective in terms of PFS and OS. Moreover, we found that PARPi and platinum therapy were comparable in terms of PSA50 response rate and OS, highlighting that platinum is a valid treatment option for BRCA-positive mCRPC patients. However, prospective interventional studies comparing these agents are essential to provide a higher level of evidence.
    RESULTS: In this report, we found that different poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors had similar efficacy, and platinum was a valid treatment option in BRCA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号