carboplatin

卡铂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究盆腔放疗对复发性宫颈癌患者化疗期间骨髓抑制的影响。方法和材料:对129例复发性宫颈癌患者进行回顾性分析,其中77例有盆腔放疗史,52例无盆腔放疗史的患者作为对照组。所有患者接受紫杉醇联合卡铂(TC)化疗方案,每21天5-6次。血液毒性,包括红细胞计数,白细胞和中性粒细胞和血小板,使用不良事件通用术语标准(4.0版)定义。年龄之间的关系,身体质量指数,无病生存,病理类型,FIGO阶段,放疗方式及化疗期间骨髓抑制程度进行统计学分析,分别,所有复发性宫颈癌患者。结果:77例有放疗史的患者中,73例复发患者(94.8%)出现骨髓抑制,然后进行化疗。未经放疗的复发性宫颈癌患者(n=52)在化疗后出现骨髓抑制的风险较低(n=39,75.0%,P<0.05)。有或没有放疗史的复发性宫颈患者化疗后出现严重骨髓抑制(Ⅲ~Ⅳ级)的概率分别为41.6%和13.5%,分别为(P<0.05)。在单变量分析中,放疗方法与复发性宫颈癌患者III-IV级骨髓抑制发生率相关(P=0.005).在多变量分析中,放疗方式和扩展视野放疗是III-IV级骨髓抑制的危险因素(χ2=16.975,P=0.001)。白细胞计数无显著差异,观察有和没有放疗的患者在化疗前复发时的血红蛋白和血小板。白细胞计数减少,中性粒细胞和血小板计数的绝对值复合大多数类型的III和IV级骨髓抑制。结论:既往盆腔放疗可显著增加复发宫颈癌患者化疗期间骨髓抑制的发生率。在治疗复发的宫颈癌患者时,化疗前放疗,特别是对于那些有经验的外部束放射治疗,建议给予必要的关注和及时的干预,以确保完成化疗和临床疗效。
    Purpose: To study the effects of prior pelvic radiotherapy on bone marrow suppression in recurrent cervical cancer patients during chemotherapy. Methods and materials: The cases of 129 patients with recurrent cervical cancer were reviewed, of which 77 patients had pelvic radiotherapy history and another 52 patients with no pelvic radiotherapy history were used as control group. All patients received a chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel combined with carboplatin (TC) per 21 days for 5-6 times. Hematologic toxicity, including count of red blood cell, white blood cell and neutrophil cell and platelet, was defined by using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). The relationship between age, body mass index, disease free survival, pathological types, FIGO stages, radiotherapy methods and the degree of bone marrow suppression during chemotherapy was statistically analyzed, respectively, for all recurrent cervical cancer patients. Results: Among 77 patients with previous radiotherapy history, 73 recurrent patients (94.8%) had bone marrow suppression followed by chemotherapy. Recurrent cervical cancer patients without prior radiotherapy (n=52) showed a lower risk of bone marrow suppression followed by chemotherapy (n=39, 75.0%, P < 0.05). The probability of severe bone marrow suppression (grade III-IV) after chemotherapy in recurrent cervical patients with or without history of radiotherapy was 41.6% and 13.5%, respectively (P < 0.05). In univariate analysis, radiotherapy methods were associated with the incidence of grade III-IV bone marrow suppression in recurrent cervical cancer patients (P=0.005). In multivariate analysis, radiotherapy methods and extended-field radiotherapy were the risk factor of grade III-IV bone marrow suppression (χ2=16.975, P=0.001). No significant differences in the counts of white blood cell, hemoglobin and platelet were observed before chemotherapy at relapse between patients with and without prior radiotherapy. Reduction of white blood cell counts, absolute value of neutrophil cell and platelet counts composited majority type of grade III and IV bone marrow suppression. Conclusions: The prior pelvic radiotherapy significantly increased the incidence of bone marrow suppression during chemotherapy in recurrent cervical cancer patients. When treating recurrent cervical cancer patients with chemotherapy who had prior radiotherapy, especially for those experienced external beam radiation therapy, essential attention and timely intervention are recommended to ensure completion of chemotherapy and clinical efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多患者接受剂量减少或提前终止化疗以减少放化疗相关的毒性,这可能会增加他们的生存风险。然而,这一策略可能导致局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(LA-ESCC)患者用药剂量不足.本研究旨在分析LA-ESCC患者的相对剂量强度(RDI)与生存结局之间的关系。
    方法:这项回顾性研究评估了LA-ESCC(cT2N+M0,cT3-4NanyM0)患者接受新辅助放化疗(NCRT)联合根治性食管切除术。患者在手术前接受了2个疗程的紫杉醇加卡铂(TC)联合放疗。在NCRT期间,计算了RDI,定义为接受的剂量占标准剂量的百分比,并估计了剂量延迟的发生率(在任何疗程周期中≥7天).使用ROC曲线获得最佳RDI截止值(0.7)。使用对数秩检验比较Kaplan-Meier存活曲线,使用风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)衡量治疗效果.
    结果:我们纳入了132名患者,分为RDI<0.7和RDI≥0.7组,采用截断值0.7。RDI分级是OS的独立预后因素。两组的基线人口统计学和临床特征平衡良好。没有证据表明RDI<0.7的患者毒性较低或RDI≥0.7的患者毒性较高。然而,RDI<0.7且剂量减少的患者总生存期较差[HR0.49,95%CI0.27~0.88,P=0.015].RDI越低的风险随着剂量延迟时间越长而增加(P<0.001)。
    结论:避免放化疗毒性给药的RDI低于0.7导致治疗剂量强度降低和总生存期降低。
    BACKGROUND: Many patients undergo dose reduction or early termination of chemotherapy to reduce chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity, which may increase their risk of survival. However, this strategy may result in underdosing patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the relative dose intensity (RDI) and survival outcomes in patients with LA-ESCC.
    METHODS: This retrospective study assessed patients with LA-ESCC (cT2N + M0, cT3-4NanyM0) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) with curative-intent esophagectomy. The patients received 2 courses of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) combination radiotherapy prior to undergoing surgery. During NCRT, RDI was computed, defined as the received dose as a percentage of the standard dose, and the incidence of dose delays was estimated (≥ 7 days in any course cycle). The best RDI cutoff value (0.7) was obtained using ROC curve. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, the treatment effect was measured using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
    RESULTS: We included 132 patients in this study, divided into RDI < 0.7 and RDI ≥ 0.7 groups using cut-off value of 0.7. RDI grade was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced between the groups. There was no evidence that patients with RDI < 0.7 experienced less toxicity or those with RDI ≥ 0.7 resulted in more toxicity. However, patients with RDI < 0.7 who were given reduced doses had a worse overall survival [HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88, P = 0.015]. The risk of a lower RDI increased with a longer dose delay time (P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The RDI below 0.7 for avoiding chemoradiotherapy toxicity administration led to a reduction in the dose intensity of treatment and decreased overall survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经验性化疗仍然是未知原发癌(CUP)患者的标准治疗方法。已经开发了基因表达谱分析方法来鉴定CUP患者的起源组织;然而,其临床获益尚未得到证实.我们旨在评估90基因表达测定指导的位点特异性治疗与经验性化疗在CUP患者中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:这项随机对照试验在复旦大学上海癌症中心(上海,中国)。我们招募了年龄在18-75岁的患者,先前未经治疗的CUP(组织学证实的转移性腺癌,鳞状细胞癌,低分化癌,或低分化肿瘤)和东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)的表现状态为0-2,不适合进行局部根治性治疗。通过Pocock和Simon最小化方法将患者随机分配(1:1)以接受特定部位治疗或经验性化疗(紫杉烷[第1天静脉输注175mg/m2]加铂[顺铂75mg/m2或卡铂在第1天静脉输注曲线5下的面积],或吉西他滨[在第1天和第8天通过静脉输注1000mg/m2]加铂[与上述相同])。最小化因素是ECOG表现状态和疾病程度。临床医生和患者没有被掩盖干预措施。通过90基因表达测定预测位点特异性治疗组中的肿瘤起源,并相应地施用治疗。主要终点是意向治疗人群的无进展生存期。试验已经完成,分析是最后的。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03278600)注册。
    结果:2017年9月18日至2021年3月18日,182例患者(男性105例[58%],77[42%]女性)被随机分配接受特定部位治疗(n=91)或经验性化疗(n=91)。在特定部位治疗组中,五种最常见的预测起源组织是胃食管(14[15%]),肺(12[13%]),卵巢(11[12%]),子宫颈(11[12%]),和乳房(九[10%])。在数据截止日期(2023年4月30日),中位随访时间为33·3个月(IQR30·4~51·0),经验性化疗组为30·9个月(27·6~35·5).定点治疗的中位无进展生存期明显长于经验性化疗(9·6个月[95%CI8·4-11·9]vs6·6个月[5·5-7·9];未调整的风险比0·68[95%CI0·49-0·93];p=0·017)。在167名开始计划治疗的患者中,部位特异性治疗组82例患者中的46例(56%)和经验性化疗组85例患者中的52例(61%)出现3级或更严重的治疗相关不良事件;部位特异性治疗和经验性化疗组最常见的是中性粒细胞计数降低(36[44%]vs42[49%]),白细胞计数减少(17[21%]对26[31%]),贫血(十[12%]对九[11%])。在特定部位治疗组中有5例(6%)患者和经验性化疗组中有2例(2%)患者报告了与治疗相关的严重不良事件。没有观察到治疗相关的死亡。
    结论:这项单中心随机试验表明,与经验性化疗相比,90基因表达测定指导的位点特异性治疗可以改善既往未治疗过的CUP患者的无进展生存期。通过90基因表达测定进行的位点特异性预测可能会提供更多的疾病信息,并扩展这些患者的治疗性医疗设备。
    背景:上海医院发展中心临床研究计划,上海市优秀学术带头人计划,和上海抗癌协会SOAR项目。
    有关摘要的中文翻译,请参见补充材料部分。
    BACKGROUND: Empirical chemotherapy remains the standard of care in patients with unfavourable cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Gene-expression profiling assays have been developed to identify the tissue of origin in patients with CUP; however, their clinical benefit has not yet been demonstrated. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of site-specific therapy directed by a 90-gene expression assay compared with empirical chemotherapy in patients with CUP.
    METHODS: This randomised controlled trial was conducted at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (Shanghai, China). We enrolled patients aged 18-75 years, with previously untreated CUP (histologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, poorly differentiated carcinoma, or poorly differentiated neoplasms) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, who were not amenable to local radical treatment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by the Pocock and Simon minimisation method to receive either site-specific therapy or empirical chemotherapy (taxane [175 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion on day 1] plus platinum [cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin area under the curve 5 by intravenous infusion on day 1], or gemcitabine [1000 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8] plus platinum [same as above]). The minimisation factors were ECOG performance status and the extent of the disease. Clinicians and patients were not masked to interventions. The tumour origin in the site-specific therapy group was predicted by the 90-gene expression assay and treatments were administered accordingly. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. The trial has been completed and the analysis is final. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03278600).
    RESULTS: Between Sept 18, 2017, and March 18, 2021, 182 patients (105 [58%] male, 77 [42%] female) were randomly assigned to receive site-specific therapy (n=91) or empirical chemotherapy (n=91). The five most commonly predicted tissues of origin in the site-specific therapy group were gastro-oesophagus (14 [15%]), lung (12 [13%]), ovary (11 [12%]), cervix (11 [12%]), and breast (nine [10%]). At the data cutoff date (April 30, 2023), median follow-up was 33·3 months (IQR 30·4-51·0) for the site-specific therapy group and 30·9 months (27·6-35·5) for the empirical chemotherapy group. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with site-specific therapy than with empirical chemotherapy (9·6 months [95% CI 8·4-11·9] vs 6·6 months [5·5-7·9]; unadjusted hazard ratio 0·68 [95% CI 0·49-0·93]; p=0·017). Among the 167 patients who started planned treatment, 46 (56%) of 82 patients in the site-specific therapy group and 52 (61%) of 85 patients in the empirical chemotherapy group had grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events; the most frequent of these in the site-specific therapy and empirical chemotherapy groups were decreased neutrophil count (36 [44%] vs 42 [49%]), decreased white blood cell count (17 [21%] vs 26 [31%]), and anaemia (ten [12%] vs nine [11%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in five (6%) patients in the site-specific therapy group and two (2%) in the empirical chemotherapy group. No treatment-related deaths were observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: This single-centre randomised trial showed that site-specific therapy guided by the 90-gene expression assay could improve progression-free survival compared with empirical chemotherapy among patients with previously untreated CUP. Site-specific prediction by the 90-gene expression assay might provide more disease information and expand the therapeutic armamentarium in these patients.
    BACKGROUND: Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center, Program for Shanghai Outstanding Academic Leader, and Shanghai Anticancer Association SOAR PROJECT.
    UNASSIGNED: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Inetetamab是国内首个研发的创新抗HER2单克隆抗体,在HER2阳性晚期乳腺癌中被证明是有效和安全的。然而,其在HER2阳性局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)新辅助治疗中的有效性和安全性仍有待验证.
    方法:这项前瞻性队列研究旨在评估伊奈他单抗联合帕妥珠单抗的疗效和安全性。紫杉烷,和卡铂(TCbIP)在HER2阳性LABC的新辅助治疗中,将其与接受TCbHP方案治疗的患者的数据进行比较(曲妥珠单抗联合帕妥珠单抗,紫杉烷,和卡铂)使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)。主要终点是总病理完全缓解(tpCR)。不良事件(AE),客观反应率(ORR),接近pCR是关键的次要终点。
    结果:44例临床阶段IIA-IIICHER2阳性LABC患者被前瞻性纳入并接受TCbIP方案治疗。28例完成手术的患者的tpCR率为60.7%,与PSM中的TCbHP组相当并稍高(60.7%与53.6%,P=0.510)。ORR为96.4%,DCR达到100.0%。最常见的≥3级AE是中性粒细胞减少症(21.4%与11.9%,P=0.350)。未观察到左心室射血分数显著降低,无患者因不良事件退出治疗。
    结论:TCbIP新辅助治疗在HER2阳性LABC患者中显示出良好的疗效和安全性,可能是新辅助治疗的另一种有希望的选择。
    背景:NCT05749016(注册日期:2021年11月1日)。
    BACKGROUND: Inetetamab is the first domestically developed innovative anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in China, proven effective and safe in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. However, its efficacy and safety in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remain to be validated.
    METHODS: This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inetetamab combined with pertuzumab, taxanes, and carboplatin (TCbIP) in neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive LABC, comparing it to data from patients treated with the TCbHP regimen (trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab, taxanes, and carboplatin) using propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was total pathological complete response (tpCR). Adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), and near-pCR were key secondary endpoints.
    RESULTS: Forty-four patients with clinical stage IIA-IIIC HER2-positive LABC were prospectively enrolled and treated with the TCbIP regimen. The tpCR rate among 28 patients who completed surgery was 60.7%, comparable to and slightly higher than the TCbHP group in PSM (60.7% vs. 53.6%, P = 0.510). The ORR was 96.4%, and the DCR reached 100.0%. The most common ≥ grade 3 AE was neutropenia (21.4% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.350). No significant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction was observed, and no patient withdrew from treatment due to AEs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy with TCbIP showed good efficacy and safety in patients with HER2-positive LABC and might be another promising option for neoadjuvant treatment.
    BACKGROUND: NCT05749016 (registration date: Nov 01, 2021).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着晚期食管癌免疫治疗的成功,新辅助化疗(CIT)越来越多地用于局部分期食管癌,特别是在临床试验的背景下,这带来了与新辅助放化疗相似的pCR,并显示了有希望的结果。然而,在新辅助化学免疫疗法后,仍有一部分可能可手术的患者不能接受手术。该人群的后续治疗和预后仍不清楚。病理诊断为ESCC的患者,临床分期T1-3N+M0或T3-4aNanyM0(AJCC第8期),PS0-1于2020年1月至2021年6月在浙江省肿瘤医院进行回顾性研究。所有患者首先接受PD-1抑制剂加化疗(白蛋白紫杉醇,第1天260mg/m2加卡铂AUC=第1天5)每3周2-4个周期。对于那些没有接受手术的患者,使用VMAT采用50.4Gy/28F或50Gy/25F的确定性放疗,同时化疗或单独化疗。同步化疗方案包括每周TC(紫杉醇50mg/m2,d1,卡铂AUC=2,d1)或S1(60mgbidd1-14,29-42)。记录并分析患者的生存结果和治疗毒性。最终从558名在胸外科接受治疗的患者中确定了56名符合条件的患者,在所有患者中,25例(44.6%)单独接受放疗,31(55.4%)在新佐剂CIT后接受了放化疗。中位随访时间为20.4个月(四分位距[IQR]8.7-27个月)。中位PFS和OS分别为17.9个月(95%置信区间[CI]11.0-21.9个月)和20.5个月(95%CI11.8-27.9个月),分别。在亚组分析中,对CIT有部分反应(PR)的患者的中位OS为26.3个月(95%CI15.33-NA),与稳定疾病(SD)或进行性疾病(PD)患者的17个月(95%CI8.77-26.4)相比,风险比(HR)为0.54(95%CI0.27-1.06,P=0.07)。单纯放疗或放化疗患者HR=0.73,差异无统计学意义(95%CI0.72~2.6,P=0.33)。本研究中最常见的不良事件(AE)为贫血(98.2%)。白细胞减少症(83.9%),血小板减少症(53.6%)。≥3级放射性肺炎和食管炎的AEs分别为12.5%和32.1%,尤其是,6例(10.7%)死于食管瘘,2例(3.6%)死于5级肺炎。对于未接受手术的局部晚期ESCC患者,确定性放疗是一种可选的治疗策略.然而,那些对CIT无反应的患者对放疗的反应也较差,应特别注意治疗相关的毒性,尤其是食管瘘.
    With the success of immunotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) is being increasingly used for local staged esophageal cancer, especially in the context of clinical trials, which brings similar pCR with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and shows promising results. However, there is still a part of potentially operable patients can\'t undergo surgery after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. The follow-up treatment and prognosis of this population remain unclear. Patients pathologically diagnosed with ESCC, clinical stage T1-3N+M0 or T3-4aNanyM0 (AJCC 8th), PS 0-1 were retrospectively enrolled from 1/2020 to 6/2021 in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. All patients firstly received PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (albumin paclitaxel, 260 mg/m2 on day 1 plus carboplatin AUC = 5 on day 1) every 3 weeks for 2-4 cycles. For those patients who did not receive surgery, definitive radiotherapy with 50.4 Gy/28F or 50 Gy/25F was adopted using VMAT, concurrent with chemotherapy or alone. The concurrent chemotherapy regimens included weekly TC (paclitaxel 50 mg/m2, d1, carboplatin AUC = 2, d1) or S1 (60 mg bid d1-14, 29-42). The survival outcomes and treatment toxicity were recorded and analyzed. A total of 56 eligible patients were finally identified from 558 patients who were treated in department of thoracic surgery, among all the patients, 25 (44.6%) received radiotherapy alone, and 31 (55.4%) received chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant CIT. The median follow-up was 20.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 8.7-27 months). The median PFS and OS were 17.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.0-21.9 months) and 20.5 months (95% CI 11.8-27.9 months), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the median OS was 26.3 months (95% CI 15.33-NA) for patients exhibiting partial response (PR) to CIT, compared to 17 months (95% CI 8.77-26.4) for those with stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD), yielding a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54 (95% CI 0.27-1.06, P = 0.07). No significant difference was observed for patients received radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy with HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.72-2.6, P = 0.33). The most common Adverse events (AEs) observed during this study were anemia (98.2%), leukopenia (83.9%), thrombocytopenia (53.6%). AEs of grade ≥ 3 radiation-induced pneumonitis and esophagitis were 12.5% and 32.1%, especially, 6 patients (10.7%) died from esophageal fistula and 2 patients (3.6%) died from grade 5 pneumonitis. For local advanced ESCC patients after neoadjuvant CIT who did not receive surgery, definitive radiotherapy was an optional treatment strategy. However, those patients with no response to CIT also showed poor response to radiotherapy, and particular attention should be paid to treatment related toxicity, especially esophageal fistula.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近年来,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗取得了进展,受益于免疫治疗和靶向治疗的进步。然而,存在有限的生物标志物,以帮助临床医生和患者选择最有效的,个性化治疗策略。靶向的基于下一代测序的基因组分析已成为癌症治疗中的常规,并在过去十年中产生了重要的临床基因组数据。这使得用于药物反应的突变生物标志物的开发成为可能。
    方法:为了研究患者对特定体细胞突变治疗的反应之间的关联,我们分析了NSCLCGENIEBPC队列,其中包括1,846例患者的2,004例肿瘤样本。
    结果:我们确定了与免疫疗法和化疗反应相关的体细胞突变特征,包括卡铂-,顺铂-,以培美曲或多西他赛为基础的化疗。化疗相关标签的预测能力受到表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变状态的显着影响。因此,我们开发了一个EGFR野生型特异性突变标记用于化疗选择.
    结论:我们的治疗特异性基因特征将帮助临床医生和患者从多种治疗方案中进行选择。
    BACKGROUND: Treatment of non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved in recent years, benefiting from advances in immunotherapy and targeted therapy. However, limited biomarkers exist to assist clinicians and patients in selecting the most effective, personalized treatment strategies. Targeted next-generation sequencing-based genomic profiling has become routine in cancer treatment and generated crucial clinicogenomic data over the last decade. This has made the development of mutational biomarkers for drug response possible.
    METHODS: To investigate the association between a patient\'s responses to a specific somatic mutation treatment, we analyzed the NSCLC GENIE BPC cohort, which includes 2,004 tumor samples from 1,846 patients.
    RESULTS: We identified somatic mutation signatures associated with response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy, including carboplatin-, cisplatin-, pemetrexed- or docetaxel-based chemotherapy. The prediction power of the chemotherapy-associated signature was significantly affected by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status. Therefore, we developed an EGFR wild-type-specific mutation signature for chemotherapy selection.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our treatment-specific gene signatures will assist clinicians and patients in selecting from multiple treatment options.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估纳米粒白蛋白结合型紫杉醇(nab-紫杉醇)加铂与紫杉醇加铂作为一线治疗转移性或复发性宫颈癌的疗效和安全性。
    方法:在2020年10月至2022年3月期间,回顾性招募在我院诊断为转移性或复发性宫颈癌的连续患者。54例患者接受了nab-紫杉醇联合顺铂或卡铂治疗。24例患者接受紫杉醇联合顺铂或卡铂治疗。使用多变量逻辑回归模型进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析。比较两组患者的客观缓解率(ORR),原始和匹配数据集中的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
    结果:在原始数据集中,nab-紫杉醇组的ORR均高于紫杉醇组(72.2%vs.45.8%;P=0.025)和匹配的数据集(81.1%与47.6%;P=0.008)。在原始和匹配的数据集中,nab-紫杉醇组的中位PFS明显长于紫杉醇组(12vs.7个月;P<0.05)。与紫杉醇组15个月相比,nab-紫杉醇组未达到中位OS,有延长的趋势。最常见的毒性是血液学不良事件,包括3-4级中性粒细胞减少症,3级贫血和血小板减少,组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。
    结论:与紫杉醇加铂相比,nab-紫杉醇联合铂作为转移性或复发性宫颈癌患者的一线治疗可能是一种有效且可耐受的选择。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus platinum versus paclitaxel plus platinum as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.
    METHODS: Between October 2020 and March 2022, consecutive patients with diagnosed with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer were retrospectively recruited in our hospital. Fifty-four patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatin. Twenty-four patients were treated with paclitaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatin. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was done using a multivariable logistic regression model. The two groups were compared for objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the raw and matched dataset.
    RESULTS: The nab-paclitaxel group showed a higher ORR than the paclitaxel group both in the raw dataset (72.2% vs. 45.8%; P = 0.025) and matched dataset (81.1% vs. 47.6%; P = 0.008). The median PFS was significantly longer in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel group both in the raw and matched dataset (12 vs. 7 months; P < 0.05). The median OS was not reached in the nab-paclitaxel group compared with 15 months in the paclitaxel group, with a trend toward prolongation. The most common toxicity was hematological adverse events, including grade 3-4 neutropenia, grade 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia in both groups and no statistical differences were observed between the groups (all P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with paclitaxel plus platinum, nab-paclitaxel plus platinum may be an effective and tolerable option as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    增强的耐药性在治疗卵巢癌(OC)中提出了重大挑战。异硫氰酸苯乙酯(PEITC)参与OC耐药,但机制尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们研究了与PEITC相关的OC中卡铂敏感性的分子调控机制,MAFBZIP转录因子F(MAFF),和锌指蛋白(ZNF)711。PEITC治疗后OC细胞的卡铂敏感性显着增加。敲除MAFF可显著增强OC细胞的卡铂敏感性,促进细胞凋亡,体外抑制集落形成效率,抑制体内肿瘤生长。预测了MAFF与ZNF711启动子的结合位点,MAFF的敲除显著增加了ZNF711的表达。双荧光素酶测定和ChIP-PCR的结果证实了MAFF与ZNF711启动子的结合。免疫荧光和CoIP结果表明MAFF及其相互作用蛋白的共定位和结合,BZIP转录因子ATF样3(BATF3)。同样,我们证实了BATF3与ZNF711启动子的结合。单独敲低BATF3和同时敲低BATF3和MAFF对ZNF711转录和凋亡显示出相似的调节作用。这些表明MAFF与BATF3的结合抑制了OC中的ZNF711转录并降低了卡铂敏感性。
    Enhanced drug resistance poses a significant challenge in treating ovarian cancer (OC). Phenylethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) is involved in drug resistance in OC, but the mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the molecular regulatory mechanism of carboplatin sensitivity in OC associated with PEITC, MAF BZIP Transcription Factor F (MAFF), and Zinc finger proteins (ZNF) 711. The carboplatin sensitivity was significantly increased in OC cells after PEITC treatment. Knockdown of MAFF significantly enhanced the carboplatin sensitivity of OC cells, promoted apoptosis, inhibited colony-forming efficiency in vitro, and suppressed tumor growth in vivo. The binding site of MAFF to the ZNF711 promoter was predicted, and the knockdown of MAFF significantly increased the ZNF711 expression. Results of the dual luciferase assay and ChIP-PCR confirmed the binding of MAFF to the ZNF711 promoter. Immunofluorescence and CoIP results demonstrated the colocalization and the binding of MAFF and its interacting protein, BZIP Transcription Factor ATF-like 3 (BATF3). Similarly, we confirmed the binding of BATF3 to the ZNF711 promoter. Knockdown of BATF3 alone and simultaneous knockdown of BATF3 and MAFF showed similar regulatory effects on ZNF711 transcription and apoptosis. These suggested that the binding of MAFF to BATF3 inhibited ZNF711 transcription and reduced carboplatin sensitivity in OC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新辅助免疫疗法加化疗在表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的临床疗效尚不清楚。这里,我们报告了西蒙两阶段设计的中期结果,在可切除的EGFR突变型NSCLC中使用新辅助治疗辛替利玛联合卡铂和nab-紫杉醇的2期试验。18例患者均接受根治性手术,一名患者出现手术延迟.14名患者表现出确诊的放射学反应,44%达到主要病理反应(MPR),无病理完全缓解(pCR)。在治疗之前和之后观察到类似的基因组改变,而不影响后续EGFR-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的体外功效。CCR8+调节性T(Treg)hi/CXCL13+耗竭T(Tex)lo细胞的浸润和T细胞受体(TCR)克隆扩增定义了对免疫疗法具有高度抗性的EGFR-NSCLC突变亚型,该表型可能是预测免疫治疗疗效的有希望的标志。EGFR突变NSCLC中的知情循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)检测可以帮助识别对新辅助免疫化疗无反应的患者。这些发现为新辅助免疫化疗的利用和了解EGFR突变NSCLC的免疫抗性提供了支持数据。
    The clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy remains elusive in localized epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report interim results of a Simon\'s two-stage design, phase 2 trial using neoadjuvant sintilimab with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel in resectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC. All 18 patients undergo radical surgery, with one patient experiencing surgery delay. Fourteen patients exhibit confirmed radiological response, with 44% achieving major pathological response (MPR) and no pathological complete response (pCR). Similar genomic alterations are observed before and after treatment without influencing the efficacy of subsequent EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in vitro. Infiltration and T cell receptor (TCR) clonal expansion of CCR8+ regulatory T (Treg)hi/CXCL13+ exhausted T (Tex)lo cells define a subtype of EGFR-mutant NSCLC highly resistant to immunotherapy, with the phenotype potentially serving as a promising signature to predict immunotherapy efficacy. Informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in EGFR-mutant NSCLC could help identify patients nonresponsive to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. These findings provide supportive data for the utilization of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and insight into immune resistance in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:可切除的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗包括联合化疗和免疫检查点抑制剂的围手术期治疗,通常持续6到12个月。然而,潜在可切除的鳞状细胞肺癌(SCC)的最佳治疗策略仍不清楚.这项2期试验旨在评估tislelizumab联合化疗的浓缩四周期围手术期治疗方案在可能可切除的III期SCC患者中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:可能可切除的IIIA-IIIB(N2)SCC患者接受静脉注射tislelizumab,白蛋白结合型紫杉醇,和卡铂长达四个周期。主要终点是主要病理反应(MPR)和治疗相关不良事件的发生率。还评估了用于功效预测的安全性和潜在生物标志物。
    结果:在35名入选患者中,32例患者均完成R0切除手术。24例患者达到MPR,14例患者达到病理完全缓解(pCR)。在31例患者中观察到影像学客观反应。12个月和24个月无事件生存率分别为85.7和61.0%,分别。四名患者经历了3级或4级不良事件。基于肿瘤组织的下一代测序揭示了几种生物标志物与病理反应之间的潜在关联。包括肿瘤新抗原负荷评分,18基因表达谱评分,CD8+T细胞,M1/M2巨噬细胞比率和干扰素-γ表达水平。此外,循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)动力学和浓度也与病理反应相关,术后1个月ctDNA的存在是疾病复发的强预测因子.此外,支气管肺泡灌洗液中的宏基因组测序表明,链球菌是pCR组中最丰富的属。
    结论:在可能可切除的III期SCC中,tislelizumab联合化疗的浓缩四周期围手术期治疗方案显示了有希望的疗效和可控的毒性。特异性生物标志物显示出预测治疗疗效的潜力,并初步和间接地探索了pCR患者优异抗肿瘤反应的机制。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT05024266。2021年8月27日注册。
    BACKGROUND: The standard care for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves perioperative therapy combining chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, typically lasting 6 to 12 months. However, the optimal treatment strategies for potentially resectable squamous cell lung carcinoma (SCC) remain unclear. This Phase 2 trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a condensed four-cycle perioperative treatment regimen with tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable stage III SCC.
    METHODS: Patients with potentially resectable stage IIIA-IIIB (N2) SCC received intravenous tislelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and carboplatin for up to four cycles. The primary endpoints were major pathologic response (MPR) and incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Safety and potential biomarkers for efficacy prediction were also assessed.
    RESULTS: Among 35 enrolled patients, 32 underwent surgery with R0 resection achieved in all cases. MPR was achieved in 24 patients and pathological complete response (pCR) in 14 patients. Radiographic objective response was observed in 31 patients. The 12-month and 24-month event-free survival rate was 85.7 and 61.0%, respectively. Four patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Tumor tissue based next-generation sequencing revealed the potential associations between several biomarkers and pathological response, including tumor neoantigen burden score, 18-gene expression profile score, CD8 + T cells, M1/M2 macrophages ratio and interferon-gamma expression level. Besides, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and concentration were also associated with pathological response and the presence of ctDNA at postoperative month 1 was a strong predictor for disease relapse. Furthermore, metagenomic sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid demonstrated Streptococcus was the most abundant genus in the pCR group.
    CONCLUSIONS: A condensed four-cycle perioperative treatment regimen of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable toxicities in potentially resectable stage III SCC. Specific biomarkers showed potential for predicting treatment efficacy and the mechanism of superior antitumor response of pCR patients was preliminarily and indirectly explored.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05024266. Registered August 27, 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号