TEP

TEP
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹股沟疝修补术是普通外科医生最常见的手术。开放网格技术通常代表腹股沟修复的主要技术,但是通常需要不同的方法。发现腹腔镜检查是最大程度地减少Nyhus和Stoppa描述的腹膜前开放技术影响的答案。1990年代初期,完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)和经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)的引入开启了腹股沟疝手术的新篇章。微创技术与开放网格,然后一个对另一个,很快成为腹壁外科医生的热门话题。随着时间的推移,手术和适应症的数量增加了,而且还在增加。这篇综述旨在概述两种主要的腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术技术,回答以下问题:谁应该执行它们?最小化并发症和优化手术时间所需的学习曲线是什么?哪一个(在选修和紧急设置中)?他们是如何执行的?标准技术已经详细描述,并增加了来自腹壁外科转诊中心的个人观察.从21世纪初至今的主要评论,比较了这些技术,被分析,和报告的结果,证实了这两种技术的相当的安全性和有效性。
    Groin hernia repair is the most common procedure performed by general surgeons. The open mesh technique generally represents the main technique for an inguinal repair, but a different approach is often required. Laparoscopy was found to be the answer to minimizing the impact of the preperitoneal open techniques described by Nyhus and Stoppa. The introduction of the totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) in the early 1990s started a new chapter in groin hernia surgery. The minimally invasive techniques vs. open mesh, and then one against the other, soon became a hot topic among abdominal wall surgeons. With time, the number of procedures and indications increased and are still increasing. This review aims to provide an overview of the two main laparoscopic techniques for groin hernia repair, answering the following questions: Who should perform them? What is the learning curve required to minimize complications and optimize operative time? When is a minimally invasive approach indicated, and which one (both in elective and in emergency setting)? How are they performed? The standard techniques have been described in detail, and personal observations from an abdominal wall surgery referral center were added. The main reviews from the early 2000s up to date, which compared the techniques, were analyzed, and the results reported, confirming the comparable safety and efficacy of both these techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    温度和光照是影响温室栽培番茄果实品质形成的关键因素。然而,很少有模拟模型来检验番茄果实品质形成与温度和光照之间的关系。在这项研究中,建立了一个模型,研究了可溶性糖(SSC)、有机酸含量(OAC),和SSC/OAC以及日光温室果实成熟期的热效率和光合有效辐射(TEP)的累积乘积。计算均方根误差(RMSE)值,比较模拟值与实测值的一致性,和SSC的RMSE值,OAC,SSC/OAC为0.09%,0.14%,和0.358。采用层次分析法(AHP)和熵权法得到质量指标的组合权重,排序为SSC>OAC>SSC/OAC>CI>番茄红素>Vc>果实硬度。使用TOPSIS方法(与理想解决方案相似的顺序偏好技术)获得了综合果实品质评估值,并探索了番茄果实综合品质与TEP之间的模拟模型。该研究可以准确地模拟和量化日光温室中番茄果实成熟过程中果实品质的积累,以响应环境条件。
    Temperature and light are the key factors affecting the formation of tomato fruit quality in greenhouse cultivation. However, there are few simulation models that examine the relationship between tomato fruit quality formation and temperature and light. In this study, a model was established that investigated the relationships between soluble sugar (SSC), organic acid content (OAC), and SSC/OAC and the cumulative product of thermal effectiveness and photosynthetically active radiation (TEP) during the fruit-ripening period in a solar greenhouse. The root mean square error (RMSE) values were calculated to compare the consistency between the simulated and measured values, and the RMSE values for SSC, OAC, and SSC/OAC were 0.09%, 0.14%, and 0.358, respectively. The combined weights of quality indicators were obtained using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy weighting method, ranking as SSC > OAC > SSC/OAC > CI > lycopene > Vc > fruit firmness. The comprehensive fruit quality evaluation value was obtained using the TOPSIS method (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution) and a simulation model between comprehensive tomato fruit quality and TEP was explored. This study could accurately simulate and quantify the accumulation of tomato fruit quality during fruit ripening in response to environmental conditions in a solar greenhouse.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们目前缺乏一种强大的非侵入性方法来测量人类的前额叶兴奋性。前额叶皮层中并发的TMS和EEG通常被伪影混淆。在这里,我们询问实时优化是否可以减少伪影并增强左前额叶兴奋性的TMS-EEG测量。
    此闭环优化程序调整左dlPFCTMS线圈位置,angle,和强度实时基于脑电图对TMS的反应。我们的结果测量是左前额叶早期(20-60ms)和局部TMS诱发电位(EL-TEP)。
    在18名健康参与者中,这种线圈角度和大脑目标的优化显著减少了63%的伪影,当结合强度的增加,与非优化方法相比,EL-TEP幅度增加了75%。
    在dlPFC刺激期间实时优化TMS参数可以增强EL-TEP。
    增强我们测量前额叶兴奋性的能力对于监测病理状态和治疗反应很重要。
    我们开发了一种实时闭环优化程序,以从dlPFCTMS获得高振幅早期局部TEP(EL-TEP)。线圈角度和大脑目标的顺序优化减少了63%的伪影。线圈角度的顺序优化,大脑目标,强度使EL-TEP振幅增加75%。
    UNASSIGNED: We currently lack a robust noninvasive method to measure prefrontal excitability in humans. Concurrent TMS and EEG in the prefrontal cortex is usually confounded by artifacts. Here we asked if real-time optimization could reduce artifacts and enhance a TMS-EEG measure of left prefrontal excitability.
    UNASSIGNED: This closed-loop optimization procedure adjusts left dlPFC TMS coil location, angle, and intensity in real-time based on the EEG response to TMS. Our outcome measure was the left prefrontal early (20-60 ms) and local TMS-evoked potential (EL-TEP).
    UNASSIGNED: In 18 healthy participants, this optimization of coil angle and brain target significantly reduced artifacts by 63% and, when combined with an increase in intensity, increased EL-TEP magnitude by 75% compared to a non-optimized approach.
    UNASSIGNED: Real-time optimization of TMS parameters during dlPFC stimulation can enhance the EL-TEP.
    UNASSIGNED: Enhancing our ability to measure prefrontal excitability is important for monitoring pathological states and treatment response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹腔镜手术通常被认为比开腹手术并发症少,最少的住院时间和伤口的快速愈合。我们的目的是比较通过开放和腹腔镜方法作为急诊病例手术的前腹壁不同嵌顿疝的即时和早期结果。
    这是一项回顾性比较研究,从7月开始在沙特阿拉伯王国东部地区AlAhsa市的两家医院进行,2017年6月,2022年。数据是从医院的医疗记录中检索的。所有出现在急诊室的前腹壁嵌顿疝类型不同的男性和女性患者均被纳入研究。患者分为两组;那些通过开放方法进行手术的人(I组)和那些通过腹腔镜方法进行手术的人(II组)。
    在总共70名男性和女性患者中,第一组42人,第二组28人。两组的嵌顿性疝总体上是脐旁26(37.14%),切口18(25.71%),腹股沟(右和左)17(24.28%)和上腹部9(12.86%)。I组和II组的平均手术时间分别为126.07(±9.728)和98.57(±10.079)分钟,差异为27.50分钟(p=0.807)。I组和II组患者的平均住院时间分别为1.36(±0.719)天和1.57(±0.997)天(p=0.482)。I组术后并发症发生率为6(14.28%),II组术后并发症发生率为6,6(21.43%)(p=0.658)。总的来说,两组均有12例(17.14%)患者出现并发症。当比较并发症的数量时,这表明两组之间没有显着差异(p=0.583)。
    在本研究中作为急诊病例手术的前腹壁嵌顿疝的即时和早期结果/并发症方面,腹腔镜入路并不优于开放入路。
    UNASSIGNED: Laparoscopic surgery is generally considered as better than open surgery in terms of less complications, minimal hospital stays and quick healing of the wounds. Our objective was to compare the immediate and early outcome of the different incarcerated hernias of anterior abdominal wall operated on as emergency cases by open and laparoscopic approach.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective comparative study which was conducted at two hospitals of AlAhsa city of the Eastern region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia from July, 2017 to June, 2022. The data were retrieved from the medical records of the hospitals. All male and female patients having different types of incarcerated hernias of anterior abdominal wall presenting to the emergency room were included in the study. The patients were divided in two groups; those who were operated on by open approach (Group-I) and those who were operated on by laparoscopic approach (Group-II).
    UNASSIGNED: Out of total 70 male and female patients, 42 were in Group-I and 28 in Group-II. The variety of the incarcerated hernias in both groups overall was para-umbilical 26(37.14%), incisional 18(25.71%), inguinal (right & left) 17(24.28%) and epigastric 9(12.86%). The mean operative time taken by Group I and II was 126.07 (±9.728) and 98.57 (±10.079) minutes respectively with a difference of 27.50 minutes (p=0.807). The mean hospital stay of the patients in Group I and II was 1.36(±0.719) and 1.57(±0.997) days respectively (p=0.482). The post-operative complications rate in Group-I was 6(14.28%) and in Group-II, 6(21.43%) (p=0.658). Overall, 12(17.14%) patients developed the complications in both groups. When the number of the complications is compared, it shows that there was no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.583).
    UNASSIGNED: Laparoscopic approach is not superior to the open approach in the terms of the immediate and early outcome/complications of the incarcerated hernias of the anterior abdominal wall operated as emergency cases in this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经颅磁刺激结合脑电图(TMS-EEG)是一项研究健康和疾病中皮质生理学的新技术。小脑最近作为TMS-EEG领域的一个可能的新热点而受到关注,最近发表了几篇报道。然而,通过小脑刺激获得的脑电图反应在文献中差异很大,可能是由于不同的实验方法。与传统的TMS-EEG相比,这涉及到大脑皮层的刺激,小脑TMS-EEG存在一些技术困难,包括颈部区域强烈的肌肉抽搐,以及使用双锥线圈时发出的响亮的TMS咔嗒声,导致肌电图活动和感觉电位对反应的污染。了解技术困难和局限性对于小脑TMS-EEG研究的发展至关重要。在这次审查中,我们总结了小脑TMS-EEG研究的发现,强调实验设计的局限性和可能导致实验结果之间差异的潜在问题。最后,我们提出了小脑TMS-EEG的学术和临床研究的可能方向。
    Transcranial magnetic stimulation coupled with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) is a novel technique to investigate cortical physiology in health and disease. The cerebellum has recently gained attention as a possible new hotspot in the field of TMS-EEG, with several reports published recently. However, EEG responses obtained by cerebellar stimulation vary considerably across the literature, possibly due to different experimental methods. Compared to conventional TMS-EEG, which involves stimulation of the cortex, cerebellar TMS-EEG presents some technical difficulties, including strong muscle twitches in the neck area and a loud TMS click when double-cone coils are used, resulting in contamination of responses by electromyographic activity and sensory potentials. Understanding technical difficulties and limitations is essential for the development of cerebellar TMS-EEG research. In this review, we summarize findings of cerebellar TMS-EEG studies, highlighting limitations in experimental design and potential issues that can result in discrepancies between experimental outcomes. Lastly, we propose a possible direction for academic and clinical research with cerebellar TMS-EEG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    “腹腔镜全腹膜外(TEP)”疝修补术是治疗腹股沟疝的常见外科手术。这项研究的重点是对“生活质量(QoL)”的长期评估,“慢性疼痛,和复发,以比较TEP疝手术与“网状固定(MF)”和“非固定(NF)”在BMI为35kgs/m2或更高的肥胖患者中的有效性。
    在本研究的随机对照实验中,73名患有腹股沟疝的肥胖者接受了MF(n=35)或NF(n=38)的全腹膜外疝修补术。手术后1年、3年和5年进行检查。复发,慢性疼痛,使用体格检查和验证问卷评估QoL。
    两组受试者的基线特征没有变化,疝复发率,慢性疼痛率,或QoL。手术并发症和住院时间均无明显差异。
    结果表明,在BMI为35kgs/m2或以上的人群中,用网片NF治疗TEP疝可能是成功的。受试者组之间的复发率没有实质性差异;然而,NF与慢性疼痛的发生率降低有关,这将有利于患者的满意度和康复。为确定MF在TEP疝修补术中的最佳技术,这些发现需要通过更多的研究来验证.
    UNASSIGNED: \"Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal (TEP)\" repair of hernia is a common surgical procedure for treating groin hernias. This study focused on the long-standing assessment of \"quality of life (QoL),\" chronic pain, and recurrence to compare the effectiveness of TEP hernia surgery with \"mesh fixation (MF)\" against \"nonfixation (NF)\" in patients who are obese with a BMI of 35 kgs/m2 or higher.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study\'s randomized controlled experiment, 73 obese individuals with groin hernias underwent total extraperitoneal hernia repair with either MF (n = 35) or NF (n = 38). A check-up was conducted 1, 3, and 5 years after the operation. Recurrence, chronic pain, and QoL were assessed using a physical examination and validated questionnaires.
    UNASSIGNED: There were no changes between the subjects of either group in baseline characteristics, hernia recurrence rate, chronic pain rate, or QoL. There were neither significant variations in surgical complications nor hospital stay duration.
    UNASSIGNED: The results suggest that treating TEP hernias among people with a BMI of 35 kgs/m2 or above with mesh NF may be successful. The recurrence rates among the subject groups were not substantially different; however, NF was linked with reduced rates of chronic pain which would be beneficial for patient satisfaction and recovery. To decide the optimal technique for MF in TEP hernia repair, these findings need to be verified by additional studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于经腹腹膜前(TAPP)和完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术的疗效和术后结局一直存在争议。我们的目的是评估每种技术的手术结果,主要关注术后组件,以确定是否有必要制定一项倡导单一技术的政策。
    方法:对随机对照试验和队列研究进行文献综述,以描述复发的关注点或争论点。回顾,我们对TEP和TAPP原发性腹股沟疝修补术进行了比较分析,这些修补术由具有5年以上经验的外科医生在3年(2020年1月至2022年12月)期间在3个独立的机构使用首选技术进行.
    结果:共审查了279例适用病例,其中38%(n=106)作为TEP进行,62%(n=173)作为TAPP进行。正如预期的那样,该队列的人口严重偏向男性人口;然而,每个亚组之间无差异.TEP疝修补术显示术后1小时和24小时疼痛评分显著改善,(1.67±0.45,p<0.05和1.97±0.31,p<0.05)。在住院时间类别中没有发现明显的差异,复发率,患者总体满意度。
    结论:研究显示,使用TEP腹股沟疝修补术的结果总体上有所改善;然而,从长期来看,没有发现有统计学意义的结果主张改变原有的外科医生偏好.
    BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate about the efficacy and postoperative outcomes of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. Our aim is to assess the surgical outcomes of each technique, focusing predominantly on postoperative components to determine if establishing a policy to advocate for a single technique is warranted.
    METHODS: A literary review of randomized control trials and cohort studies to delineate recurrent concerns or points of contention was undertaken. A retrospective, comparative analysis was performed of TEP and TAPP primary inguinal hernia repairs performed by surgeons with more than five-year experience with their preferred technique over a three-year period (January 2020 to December 2022) at three separate institutions.
    RESULTS: A total of 279 applicable cases were reviewed of which 38% (n=106) were performed as TEP and 62% (n=173) performed as TAPP. The demographic of the cohort was heavily skewed towards the male population as expected; however, there were no differences between each subgroup. TEP hernia repair showed a significantly improved postoperative pain score at one and 24 hours, respectively (1.67 ± 0.45, p < 0.05 and 1.97 ± 0.31, p < 0.05). No discernible difference was noted in the categories of length of hospital stay, recurrence rate, and overall patient satisfaction.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study showed overall improved results using the TEP inguinal hernia repair technique; however, no statistically significant results were demonstrated in the long term to advocate for changes to pre-existing surgeon preferences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:经颅磁刺激结合脑电图(TMS-EEG)为研究脑连通性提供了独特的机会。然而,尚未研究枕骨TMS后信号传播动力学中可能的半球不对称性。(2)方法:18例健康受试者在两个不同的脑电图部位行枕骨单脉TMS,对应于早期视觉区域。我们使用最先进的贝叶斯估计方法从EEG数据中准确估计TMS诱发电位(TEP),以前没有在这种情况下使用过。为了捕捉信息流模式的快速动态,我们结合信息部分有向相干(iPDC)度量实现了自校正优化卡尔曼滤波(STOK),使我们能够导出时变连通性矩阵。随后,进行了图分析来评估关键网络属性,提供对大脑网络的整体网络组织的洞察。(3)结果:我们的发现揭示了TMS刺激后对有效大脑连通性和图形网络的明显的侧向效应,左侧刺激促进对侧额叶区域之间的交流,右侧刺激促进半球内同侧连通性增加,如统计检验所示(p<0.001)。(4)结论:在连通性方面确定的半球差异提供了对参与视觉信息处理的大脑网络的新颖见解,揭示神经对枕骨刺激反应的半球特异性。
    (1) Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) provides a unique opportunity to investigate brain connectivity. However, possible hemispheric asymmetries in signal propagation dynamics following occipital TMS have not been investigated. (2) Methods: Eighteen healthy participants underwent occipital single-pulse TMS at two different EEG sites, corresponding to early visual areas. We used a state-of-the-art Bayesian estimation approach to accurately estimate TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) from EEG data, which has not been previously used in this context. To capture the rapid dynamics of information flow patterns, we implemented a self-tuning optimized Kalman (STOK) filter in conjunction with the information partial directed coherence (iPDC) measure, enabling us to derive time-varying connectivity matrices. Subsequently, graph analysis was conducted to assess key network properties, providing insight into the overall network organization of the brain network. (3) Results: Our findings revealed distinct lateralized effects on effective brain connectivity and graph networks after TMS stimulation, with left stimulation facilitating enhanced communication between contralateral frontal regions and right stimulation promoting increased intra-hemispheric ipsilateral connectivity, as evidenced by statistical test (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: The identified hemispheric differences in terms of connectivity provide novel insights into brain networks involved in visual information processing, revealing the hemispheric specificity of neural responses to occipital stimulation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹股沟疝修补术是普外科中最常用的手术之一。在意大利,每年总共进行130.000例腹股沟疝修补术,全世界每年大约有2000万例腹股沟疝被治疗。该报告代表了2015年至2020年6年期间意大利腹股沟疝修补术的趋势分析。
    方法:根据地区出院记录,根据诊断和操作规程,对2015年至2020年间在意大利公立和私立医院进行的所有腹股沟疝修补术进行了审查.为了本研究的目的,来自AgeNas(国家区域卫生服务机构)数据源的数据进行了分析。
    结果:在6年的研究期间,选择性腹股沟疝修补术的数量超过了紧急手术,绝对数字从2015年的122,737个运营到2020年的65,780个运营,2019年和2020年占总程序的比例分别从87.96%上升到83.3%,年度变化范围为-66.58%,在2020年至2019年之间,达到-2.49%,2019年至2018年(平均值=-18.74%;CI=-46.7%-9.22%;p<0.0001)。
    结论:这项来自意大利全国数据集的腹股沟疝数据的大规模审查提供了获得开放腹股沟疝修复活动快照的独特机会。更具体地说,有一种趋势是执行比紧急手术更多的选择性手术,并且开放疝修补术的数量稳步减少,有利于腹腔镜检查。
    BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed operations in general surgery. A total of 130.000 inguinal hernia repairs are performed yearly in Italy, and approximately 20 million inguinal hernias are treated worldwide annually. This report represents the trend analysis in inguinal hernia repair in Italy from a nationwide dataset for the 6-year period from 2015 to 2020.
    METHODS: Based on regional hospital discharge records, all the inguinal hernia repairs performed in public and private hospitals in Italy between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed based on diagnosis and procedure codes. For the aim of this study, data from the AgeNas (The National Agency for Regional Health Services) data source were analyzed.
    RESULTS: Elective inguinal hernia repairs outnumbered urgent operations over the 6-year study period, ranging from 122,737 operations in 2015 to 65,780 in 2020 as absolute numbers, and from 87.96 to 83.3% of total procedures in 2019 and 2020 respectively, with an annual change ranging from - 66.58%, between 2020 and 2019, to - 2.49%, between 2019 and 2018 (mean = - 18.74%; CI =- 46.7%-9.22%; p < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale review of groin hernia data from a nationwide Italian dataset provides a unique opportunity to obtain a snapshot of open groin hernia repair activity. More specifically, there is a trend to perform more elective than urgent procedures and there is a steady decrease in the amount of open hernia repairs in favor to laparoscopy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:国际腹股沟疝治疗指南强烈建议在TAPP/TEP手术期间将网状物固定在大型M3内侧缺损中。固定的主要目的是降低复发率,在这些缺陷的情况下,复发率高得惊人。2022年,由疝气外科医生和来自技术大学的科学家组成的团队使用3D腹股沟模型进行了一项实验研究,以验证在上述情况下不需要固定的假设。实验表明,刚性和解剖学形状的网格能够在不固定的情况下保持其在腹股沟中的位置。最近在瑞典数据库注册分析中发表了类似的结论。为了确认上述结果,我们决定进行一项多中心随机对照试验.
    方法:MEFI试验的主要目的是验证空间非固定的假设,标准聚丙烯网不劣于平面的固定,通过腹腔镜入路在M3疝中的聚丙烯轻质网。这项研究招募了波兰11个精通腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的大型手术中心。将12个月随访中的复发设定为主要终点。疼痛感觉(视觉模拟量表)和其他并发症的发生率(血肿,血清肿,SSI)也被注意到。根据统计分析,两组的最小样本量为83-102.第一臂(对照)由使用平板进行修复的患者组成,大孔网状物,使用组织丙烯酸胶固定。在第二只手臂上,患者将使用解剖学形状进行手术,没有固定的标准重量网。研究将是双盲的(患者/外科医生)。腹膜前间隙解剖后,外科医生会打开一个密封的信封,找出他必须执行的技术。随访将由研究秘书(也不知道使用的方法)在手术后3和12个月通过电话进行。
    结论:根据实验研究和最近的注册分析,我们相信两组的复发率会在同一水平,为疝气协会修改指南提供了强有力的论据。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05678465。2023年1月10日注册。
    BACKGROUND: International guidelines of groin hernia treatment strongly recommend to fixate the mesh in large M3 medial defects during TAPP/TEP procedures. The main purpose of fixation is to decrease the recurrence rate which is alarmingly high in case of those defects. In 2022, a team consisting of hernia surgeons and scientists from universities of technology conducted an experimental study with the use of 3D groin model to verify the hypothesis that fixation is not necessary in above cases. Experiment showed that rigid and anatomically shaped meshes are able to maintain its position in the groin without fixation. Similar conclusions were recently published in Swedish database registry analysis. To confirm above results, we decided to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    METHODS: Main objective of MEFI Trial is to verify the hypothesis that non-fixation of spatial, standard polypropylene meshes is non-inferior to fixation of flat, polypropylene lightweight meshes in M3 hernias by laparoendoscopic approach. Eleven large surgery centers in Poland having proficiency in laparoendoscopic groin hernia repairs were recruited for this study. Recurrence in 12-month follow-up was set as a primary endpoint. Pain sensation (Visual Analog Scale) and incidence of other complications (hematoma, seroma, SSI) were also noted. Based on the statistical analysis, minimal sample size in both arms was established at 83-102. The first arm (control) consists of patients undergoing a repair with the use of a flat, macroporous mesh with fixation using histoacryl glue. In the second arm, patients will be operated with the use of anatomically shaped, standard-weight mesh without fixation. Study will be double-blinded (patient/surgeon). After the dissection of preperitoneal space, surgeon will open a sealed envelope and find out which technique he will have to perform. Follow-up will be performed by Study Secretary (also blinded to the method used) via phone call 3 and 12 months after surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on experimental study and recent registry analysis, we believe that the recurrence rate in both groups would be on the same level, giving hernia societies a strong argument for amending the guidelines.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05678465. Registered on 10 January 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号