UNASSIGNED: The optimal timing for nonculprit vascular reconstruction surgery in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary disease (MVD) is still controversial. Our aim was to explore the optimal intervention time for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI patients who underwent MVD.
UNASSIGNED: The PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception to January 1, 2024 for clinical studies comparing immediate multivessel PCI and staged multivessel PCI in patients with STEMI. The primary outcomes were death from any cause, cardiovascular death, noncardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. The secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, stent thrombosis, renal dysfunction and major bleeding. The risk ratios (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with fixed-effects models and random-effects models, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
UNASSIGNED: Five randomized trials with 2,782 patients and six prospective observational studies with 3,131 patients were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The staged PCI group had significantly lower pooled RRs for myocardial infarction (0.43, 95% CI = 0.27-0.67; P = 0.0002) and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization (0.57, 95% CI = 0.41-0.78; P = 0.0004). There were no significant differences in any cause of death, cardiovascular cause of death, or noncardiac cause of death. However, the results of prospective observational studies in the real world indicated that the staged PCI group had significantly lower pooled ORs for all-cause mortality (2.30, 95% CI = 1.22-4.34; P = 0.01), cardiovascular death (2.29, 95% CI = 1.10-4.77; P = 0.03), and noncardiovascular death (3.46, 95% CI = 1.40-8.56; P = 0.007).
UNASSIGNED: According to our randomized trial analysis, staged multivessel PCI significantly reduces the risk of myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization compared to immediate multivessel PCI. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or noncardiovascular mortality risk. However, prospective non-randomized studies suggest there might be a benefit in mortality in the staged PCI group. Therefore, staged multivessel PCI may be the optimal PCI strategy for STEMI patients with MVD.

UNASSIGNED: The predictive value of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients is unclear.
UNASSIGNED: This study continuously recruited STEMI patients treated with PPCI at the Chest Pain Center of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from April 2023 to December 2023. Blood samples were taken before PPCI and the level of circulating GDF-15 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the patients were divided into CMD and Control group according to angiographic microvascular resistance (AMR) (cut-off value 2.50 mmHg*s/cm). The differences in GDF-15 expression levels between the two groups were compared, and the predictive value of GDF-15 for CMD was systematically evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 134 patients, with an average age of 59.78 ± 12.69 years and 75.37 % being male, were included in this study. Multivariable logistic regression revealed a significant association between GDF-15 and CMD (adjusted OR = 2.505, 95 % CI: 1.661-3.779, P < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of GDF-15 for CMD was 0.782 (95 % CI: 0.704-0.861), with a sensitivity of 0.795 and specificity of 0.643 in predicting CMD in PPCI. The AUC of the GDF-15 model (Model With GDF-15) was 0.867 (95 % CI: 0.806-0.928), significantly outperforming the clinical baseline model (Model Without GDF-15) (Δ AUC = 0.079, 95 % CI: 0.020-0.138, P = 0.009). Furthermore, the net reclassification improvement (NRI) was 0.854 (95 % CI: 0.543-1.166, P < 0.001), and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) was 0.151 (95 % CI: 0.089-0.213, P < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: GDF-15 can serve as a biomarker for predicting the development of CMD in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI.

UNASSIGNED: To assess the changes in QRS duration (△QRSd) before and after primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PPCI) regarding the relation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients after a first acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 244 patients with STEMI were enrolled, and clinical, biochemical, and angiographic parameters were compared between two groups based on LVEF at 6 months post-discharge. QRS duration (QRSd) was analyzed in relation to LVEF, and feature selection using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator(LASSO) regression was performed. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluation were conducted to identify predictors and assess model efficacy.
UNASSIGNED: Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of various parameters, including age, time from symptom onset to balloon dilation (STB), N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, Left ventricular end-diastolic volume(LVEDV) at baseline, left ventricular end-systolic volume(LVESV)at baseline, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDD)at baseline and six months, hospital length of stay(days), ST-segment resolution (STR), the left anterior descending artery as the infarction-related artery (IRA-LAD), frequency of TIMI 3 flow post PPCI, thrombus aspiration and/or intracoronary thrombolysis, the use of tirofiban, and the number of implanted stents(stents).In addition, postoperative QRSd and △QRSd were significantly higher in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction(LVSD). LASSO regression selected six variables as predictors of postoperative LVEF. Logistic regression analysis identified age, STB, NT-proBNP, LVESV at baseline,△QRSd, and stents, as independent factors associated with LVSD within six months for patients with a first occurrence of STEMI. The models achieved AUC values of 0.906 (using ΔQRSd),0.922(using 6 variables excluding ΔQRSd) and 0.962 (using 6 variables).
UNASSIGNED: This study identified ΔQRSd as a potential predictor of LVSD in patients with STEMI. The developed models showed good efficacy in predicting postoperative LVEF changes. These findings may contribute to risk stratification and individualized management strategies for STEMI patients.

This study explored 1-year follow-up of Parmaco-invasive strategy with half-dose recombinant human prourokinase (PHDP) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The follow-up endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) occurring within 30 days and 1 year, as well as postoperative bleeding events. The study ultimately included 150 subjects, with 75 in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) group and 75 in the PHDP group. This study found that the PHDP group had a shorter FMC-reperfusion time (42.00 min vs 96.00 min, P < 0.001). During PCI, the PHDP group had a lower percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (P = 0.021), intropin (P = 0.002) and tirofiban (P < 0.001) use. And the incidence of intraoperative arrhythmia, malignant arrhythmia, and slow flow/no-reflow was lower in the PHDP group (P < 0.001). At the 30-day follow-up, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients in the PPCI group who were readmitted due to unstable angina (P = 0.037). After 1 year of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in MACEs between the two groups (P = 0.500). The incidence of postoperative major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and minor bleeding did not differ between the PHDP and PPCI groups (P > 0.05). The PHDP facilitates early treatment of infarct-related vessels, shortens FMC-reperfusion time, and does not increase the risk of MACEs.

Since the introduction of the first pharmacological therapy for the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the early 20th century, treatment of myocardial infarction has evolved extensively throughout the years. Mechanical revascularization therapies such as the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, combined with the ongoing development of pharmacological therapies have successfully improved the survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction. To date, antiplatelet therapy (consisting of aspirin and an oral P2Y 12 inhibitor) and anticoagulation therapy represent the main stay of pharmacological treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The routine use of clopidogrel as antiplatelet agent has been largely replaced by the use of the more potent P2Y 12 inhibitors ticagrelor and prasugrel. Unfractionated heparin remains the preferred anticoagulant therapy, despite the development of other anticoagulants, including enoxaparin and bivalirudin. To date, limited evidence exists supporting a pre-hospital initiation of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in STEMI patients. The use of potent intravenous antiplatelet agents, including the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the intravenous P2Y 12 inhibitor cangrelor, is currently restricted to specific clinical settings. While several potent antithrombotic agents already exist, the search for novel potent antithrombotic agents continues, with a focus on balancing antithrombotic properties with an improved safety profile to reduce excess bleeding. This review provides an overview of currently available pharmacological therapies for the treatment of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, and an outlook for the ongoing development of novel agents in this field.

UNASSIGNED: Studies reporting the status of coronary microvascular function in the infarct-related artery (IRA) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain limited. This study utilized the coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR) to assess coronary microvascular function in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary PCI.
UNASSIGNED: We used the FlashAngio system to measure the caIMR after primary PCI in 157 patients with STEMI. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as a composite endpoint encompassing cardiac mortality, target vessel revascularization, and rehospitalization due to congestive heart failure (CHF), myocardial infarction (MI), or angina.
UNASSIGNED: Approximately 30% of patients diagnosed with STEMI and who experienced successful primary PCI during the study period had a caIMR in the IRA of > 40. The caIMR in the IRA was significantly higher than in the reference vessel (32.9 ± 15.8 vs. 27.4 ± 11.1, p < 0.001). The caIMR in the reference vessel of the caIMR > 40 group was greater than in the caIMR ≤ 40 group (30.9 ± 11.3 vs. 25.9 ± 10.7, p = 0.009). Moreover, the caIMR > 40 group had higher incidence rates of MACEs at 3 months (25.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.009) and 1 year (29.8% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.04), than in the caIMR ≤ 40 group, which were mainly driven by a higher rate of rehospitalization due to CHF, MI, or angina. A caIMR in the IRA of > 40 was an independent predictor of a MACE at 3 months (hazard ratio (HR): 3.459, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.363-8.779, p = 0.009) and 1 year (HR: 2.384, 95% CI: 1.100-5.166, p = 0.03) in patients with STEMI after primary PCI.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with STEMI after primary PCI often have coronary microvascular dysfunction, which is indicated by an increased caIMR in the IRA. An elevated caIMR of > 40 in the IRA was associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

UNASSIGNED: Deferred stenting has been recognized as beneficial for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) accompanied by a high thrombus burden. Nevertheless, its efficacy and safety specifically in geriatric STEMI patients remain to be elucidated. This study aims to bridge this knowledge gap and assess the potential advantages of deferred stenting in an older patient cohort.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, 208 geriatric patients (aged ≥ 80 years) with STEMI and a high thrombus burden in the infarct-related artery (IRA) were enrolled. They were categorized into two groups: the deferred stenting group, where stent implantation was conducted after 7-8 days of continuous antithrombotic therapy, and the immediate stenting group, where stent implantation was performed immediately.
UNASSIGNED: In the deferred stenting group, the stents used were significantly larger in diameter and shorter in length compared to those in the immediate stenting group (p < 0.05). This group also exhibited a lower incidence of distal embolism in the IRA, and higher rates of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) blood flow grade 3 and myocardial blush grade 3 (p < 0.05). Additionally, the left ventricular ejection fractions at the 1-year follow-up were significantly higher in the deferred stenting group than in the immediate stenting group (p < 0.05). The rate of the major adverse cardiac events in the deferred stenting group was significantly lower than in the immediate stenting groups (p < 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: Deferred stenting for geriatric patients with STEMI and high thrombus burden demonstrates significant clinical benefits. This approach not only reduces the incidence of distal embolism in the IRA, but also enhances myocardial tissue perfusion and preserves cardiac ejection function. Moreover, deferred stenting has proven to be safe in this patient population, indicating its potential as a preferred treatment strategy in such cases.

UNASSIGNED: Little is known of the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs, including smoking, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and hypertension) in developing countries like China. Moreover, contributors to the excess mortality of such SMuRF-less patients remain unclear.
UNASSIGNED: This study was based on a nationally representative sample of patients presenting with STEMI and admitted to 162 hospitals in 31 provinces across mainland China between 2001 and 2015. We compared clinical characteristics, treatments, and mortality during hospitalization between patients with and without SMuRFs. We also investigated the possible causes of differences in mortality and quantified the contributors to excess mortality.
UNASSIGNED: Among 16,541 patients (aged 65 ± 13 years; 30.0% women), 19.9% were SMuRF-less. These patients were older (69 vs. 65 years), experienced more cardiogenic shock and lower blood pressure at admission, and were less likely to be admitted to the cardiac ward compared to patients with SMuRFs. Moreover, SMuRF-less patients received treatment less often, including primary percutaneous coronary intervention (17.3% vs. 28.8%, p < 0.001), dual antiplatelet therapy (59.4% vs. 77.0%, p < 0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (49.9% vs. 68.1%, p < 0.001), and statins (69.9% vs. 85.1%, p < 0.001). They had higher in-hospital mortality (18.5% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001), with 56.1% of deaths occurring within 24 hours of admission. Although the difference in mortality decreased after adjusting for patient characteristics, it remained significant and concerning (odds ratio (OR) 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.59). Mediation analysis found that, in patients without SMuRFs, underutilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and statins contributed to an excess mortality risk of 22.4% and 32.5%, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Attention and action are urgently needed for STEMI patients without SMuRFs, given their high incidence and excess in-hospital mortality. The use of timely and adequate evidence-based treatments should be strengthened.

Percutaneous coronary intervention is the main strategy of revascularization and has been shown to improve outcomes in some patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, multivessel disease (MVD), a common condition in these patients, is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to single-vessel disease. Despite intervention being a standard treatment for coronary artery disease, optimal strategies and timings for patients with STEMI and MVD remain unclear. Numerous studies and meta-analyses have investigated this topic; however, many current conclusions are based on observational studies. Furthermore, clinical guidelines regarding the management of patients with STEMI and MVD contain conflicting recommendations. Therefore, we aimed to compile relevant studies and newly available evidence-based medicines to explore the most effective approach.

UNASSIGNED: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has severely affected healthcare systems around the world. This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of cardiologists regarding how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the clinical practice patterns for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
UNASSIGNED: A multicenter clinician survey was sent to 300 cardiologists working in 22 provinces in China. The survey collected demographic information and inquired about their perceptions of how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected ACS clinical practice patterns.
UNASSIGNED: The survey was completed by 211 (70.3%) cardiologists, 82.5% of whom were employed in tertiary hospitals, and 52.1% reported more than 10 years of clinical cardiology practice. Most respondents observed a reduction in ACS inpatients and outpatients in their hospitals during the pandemic. Only 29.9% of the respondents had access to a dedicated catheter room for the treatment of COVID-19-positive ACS patients. Most respondents stated that the COVID-19 pandemic had varying degrees of effect on the treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina. Compared with the assumed non-pandemic period, in the designed clinical questions, the selection of coronary interventional therapy for STEMI, NSTEMI, and unstable angina during the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly decreased (all p < 0.05), and the selection of pharmacotherapy was increased (all p < 0.05). The selection of fibrinolytic therapy for STEMI during the pandemic was higher than in the assumed non-pandemic period (p < 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected ACS clinical practice patterns. The use of invasive therapies significantly decreased during the pandemic period, whereas pharmacotherapy was more often prescribed by the cardiologists.