Social determinants of health and unmet social needs are directly related to cancer outcomes, from diagnosis to survivorship. If identified, unmet social needs can be addressed in oncology care by changing care plans in collaboration with patients\' preferences and accounting for clinical practice guidelines (eg, reducing the frequency of appointments, switching treatment modalities) and connecting patients to resources within healthcare organizations (eg, social work support, patient navigation) and with community organizations (eg, food banks, housing assistance programs). Screening for social needs is the first step to identifying those who need additional support and is increasingly recognized as a necessary component of high-quality cancer care delivery. Despite evidence about the relationship between social needs and cancer outcomes and the abundance of screening tools, the implementation of social needs screening remains a challenge, and little is known regarding the adoption, reach, and sustainability of social needs screening in routine clinical practice. We present data on the adoption and implementation of social needs screening at two large academic cancer centers and discuss three challenges associated with implementing evidence-based social needs screening in clinical practice: (1) identifying an optimal approach for administering social needs screening in oncology care, (2) adequately addressing identified unmet needs with resources and support, and (3) coordinating social needs screening between oncology and primary care.

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the three most commonly diagnosed cancers globally, after breast and lung cancer, with an estimated 2 million new cases each year, comprising ten per cent of all cancers worldwide. CRC has a complex aetiology associated with several nutrition-related risk factors. Cancer survivors frequently report alterations to their dietary habits and nutritional intake, with related adverse impacts on health-related quality of life (QOL). Whilst nutrition-related factors are recognised as survivor priorities and embedded in survivor care policies, dietary support is frequently not the standard of care in practice.
RESULTS: In this Commentary, we present details of a critical policy-practice gap for CRC survivors across the spectrum of nutrition care that we have seen growing in the literature, in hospitals, community and private practice.
CONCLUSIONS: As these nutrition concerns can adversely impact QOL and morbidity and mortality risks, we hope to raise awareness of these issues to provide a basis of future work in this area, so that policymakers and clinicians can improve support and outcomes for CRC survivors and their families.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to: 1) evaluate and compare the evidence-practice gap (EPG) in minimal intervention dentistry (MID) in Japan and Brazil by measuring concordance between dentists\' clinical practice and published evidence; and 2) identify dentists\' factors associated with the EPG in both countries.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using a web-delivered questionnaire among 136 Japanese and 110 Brazilian dentists. The questionnaire consisted of three questions concerning \"restoration diagnosis and treatment,\" \"deep caries diagnosis and treatment,\" and \"caries risk assessment\" regarding MID. A chi-square test was used to analyze differences in concordance among clinical practice and evidence from the literature between Japanese and Brazilian dentists. Logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze dentists\' factors associated with overall concordance for all three questions.
RESULTS: Overall concordance was significantly higher in Brazil (55%) than in Japan (38%) (p<0.01). Concerning how evidence was obtained, textbooks, nonacademic journals, and seminars and workshops were used as information sources more frequently by Japanese than Brazilian dentists (p<0.001), whereas scientific journal articles in English were used more frequently by Brazilian dentists (p<0.001). On logistic regression analysis, overall concordance was higher for Japanese dentists who frequently obtained evidence from scientific journal articles in English (p<0.05), whereas Brazilian dentists who frequently obtained evidence from the Internet were associated with lower overall concordance (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Because overall concordance was significantly higher in Brazil than in Japan, Japan may have a greater EPG in MID practice. Specific characteristics of Japanese and Brazilian dentists showed significant associations with overall concordance.

BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a zoonotic affliction instigated by bacteria belonging to the genus Brucella and is characterized by a diverse range of pervasiveness, multiple transmission routes, and serious hazards. It is imperative to amalgamate the current knowledge and identify gaps pertaining to the role of ticks in brucellosis transmission.
METHODS: We systematically searched China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, Google Scholar, and PubMed on the topic published until April 23, 2022. The procedure was performed in accordance with the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The selected articles were categorized across three major topic areas, and the potential data was extracted to describe evidence-practice gaps by two reviewers.
RESULTS: The search identified 83 eligible studies for the final analyses. The results highlighted the potential capacity of ticks in brucellosis transmission as evidenced by the detection of Brucella in 16 different tick species. The pooled overall prevalence of Brucella in ticks was 33.87% (range: 0.00-87.80%). The review also revealed the capability of Brucella to circulate in parasitic ticks\' different developmental stages, thus posing a potential threat to animal and human health. Empirical evidence from in vitro rodent infection experiments has revealed that ticks possess the capability to transmit Brucella to uninfected animals (range: 45.00-80.00%). Moreover, significant epidemiological associations have been found between the occurrence of brucellosis in animals and tick control in rangelands, which further suggests that ticks may serve as potential vectors for brucellosis transmission in ruminants. Notably, a mere three cases of human brucellosis resulting from potential tick bites were identified in search of global clinical case reports from 1963 to 2019.
CONCLUSIONS: It is imperative to improve the techniques used to identify Brucella in ticks, particularly by developing a novel, efficient, precise approach that can be applied in a field setting. Furthermore, due to the lack of adequate evidence of tick-borne brucellosis, it is essential to integrate various disciplines, including experimental animal science, epidemiology, molecular genetics, and others, to better understand the efficacy of tick-borne brucellosis. By amalgamating multiple disciplines, we can enhance our comprehension and proficiency in tackling tick-borne brucellosis.

Introduction Whenever a department implements the evaluation of professionals, a reasonable operational goal is to request as few evaluations as possible. In anesthesiology, evaluations of anesthesiologists (by trainees) and nurse anesthetists (by anesthesiologists) with valid and psychometrically reliable scales have been made by requesting daily evaluations of the ratee\'s performance on the immediately preceding day. However, some trainees or nurse anesthetists are paired with the same anesthesiologist for multiple days of the same week. Multiple evaluations from the same rater during a given week may contribute little incremental information versus one evaluation from that rater for the week. We address whether daily evaluation requests could be adjusted adaptively to be made once per week, hopefully substantively reducing the number of evaluation requests. Methods Every day since 1 July 2013 at the studied department, anesthesia residents and fellows have been requested by email to evaluate anesthesiologists\' quality of supervision provided during the preceding day using the De Oliveira Filho supervision scale. Every day since 29 March 2015, the anesthesiologists have been requested by email to evaluate the work habits of the nurse anesthetists during the preceding day. Both types of evaluations were made for interactions throughout the workday together, not for individual cases. The criterion for an electronic request to be sent is that the pair worked together for at least one hour that day. The current study was performed using evaluations of anesthesiologists\' supervision and nurse anesthetists\' work habits through 30 June 2023. Results If every evaluation request were completed by trainees on the same day it was requested, trainees would have received 13.5% fewer requests to evaluate anesthesiologists (9367/69,420), the maximum possible reduction. If anesthesiologists were to do the same for their evaluations of nurse anesthetists, the maximum possible reduction would be 7.1% fewer requests (4794/67,274). However, because most evaluations were completed after the day of the request (71%, 96,451/136,694), there would be fewer requests only if the evaluation were completed before or on the day of the next pairing. Consequently, in actual practice, there would have been only 2.4% fewer evaluation requests to trainees and 1.5% fewer to anesthesiologists, both decreases being significantly less than 5% (both adjusted P <0.0001). Among the trainees\' evaluations of faculty anesthesiologists, there were 1.4% with very low scores, specifically, a mean score of less than three out of four (708/41,778). Using Bernoulli cumulative sum (CUSUM) among successive evaluations, 72 flags were raised over the 10 years. Among those, there were 36% with more than one rater giving an exceptionally low score during the same week (26/72). There were 97% (70/72) with at least one rater contributing more than one score to the recent cumulative sum. Conclusion Conceptually, evaluation requests could be skipped if a rater has already evaluated the ratee that week during an earlier day working together. Our results show that the opportunity for reductions in evaluation requests is significantly less than 5%. There may also be impaired monitoring for the detection of sudden major decreases in ratee performance. Thus, the simpler strategy of requesting evaluations daily after working together is warranted.

This article discusses advance statements in mental health care, which allow individuals with mental disorders to express their preferences for treatment during mental health crises. Despite the evidence supporting their effectiveness, their implementation in clinical practice remains limited. This article explores variations among advance statements, such as psychiatric advance directives (PADs), joint crisis plans (JCPs) and self-binding directives (SBDs), highlighting their content, development process and legal status. We outline the benefits of advance statements, including empowerment, early intervention, improved therapeutic relationships and reduced compulsory admissions. We then draw attention to the challenges that may contribute to their lack of implementation, including legal complexities, communication issues, cultural factors, potential inequities, healthcare provider knowledge, changing preferences, resource constraints, crisis responses, data privacy, family involvement, and long-term evaluation. In conclusion, advance statements offer significant benefits but require addressing these critical aspects to ensure ethical and effective use. Bridging the evidence-to-practice gap is essential, with a focus on implementation science. Integrating these tools into routine clinical practice can significantly benefit individuals with severe mental disorders and mental health systems.

BACKGROUND: Bioscience subjects are essential as they allow nurses to have a clear understanding of the patient\'s condition and ultimately allow them to provide appropriate and timeous care. However, these subjects remain a significant problem in the endeavour to produce highly competent nurses.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the nursing students\' self-reported depth of understanding of bioscience and its relevance to clinical practice.
METHODS: A quantitative research approach using a descriptive survey design was employed. The sample (n = 211) included second-, third- and fourth-year undergraduate nursing students. A three-part self-administered questionnaire was adapted and used to collect the data. Data were analysed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences software version 25.0 (IBM SPSS-25). Descriptive statistics and Chi-squared test were performed to describe the relationship among the study variables.
RESULTS: Participants rated their understanding of the application of Human Biology (n = 86, 40.76%) and Pharmacology (n = 88, 41.71%) as good, while Physics (n = 80, 37.91%) and Chemistry (n = 85, 40.28%) were rated as adequate. Most participants rated Human Biology (n = 175, 83.73%) and Pharmacology (n = 181, 86.19%) as essential, while Physics (n = 129, 61.72%) and Chemistry (n = 133, 63.64%) were rated as relevant to clinical practice. Physics (n = 112, 60.54%; n = 95, 50.53%) and Chemistry (n = 126, 68.85%; n = 113 61.41%) were rated as not relevant to monitoring a patient\'s heart rate and blood pressure. Participants\' perception of the relevance of Chemistry in monitoring a patient\'s blood pressure was statistically significant (χ2 = 6.871 (df 2), p<0.05). Most participants (n = 57, 41.91%) performed at Task specific on Akinsanya\'s Bionursing model, suggesting an overall understanding of the foundational concepts and principles of bioscience.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study provided evidence of the students\' self-reported depth of understanding and perception of the relevance of bioscience and indicate a need for more emphasis on the importance of bioscience integration in clinical practice.

Anorexia of aging is a common geriatric syndrome that includes loss of appetite and/or reduced food intake, with associated undernutrition, unintended weight loss, sarcopenia, functional decline, loss of independence and other adverse health outcomes. Anorexia of aging can have multiple and severe consequences and is often overlooked by healthcare professionals (HCPs). Even more concerningly, clinicians commonly accept anorexia of aging as an inevitable part of \'normal\' aging. The aim of this assessment was to identify current gaps in professional knowledge and practice in identifying and managing older persons with anorexia. Results may guide educational programmes to fill the gaps identified and therefore improve patient outcomes.
This international assessment was conducted using a mixed-methods approach, including focus group interviews with subject matter experts and an electronic survey of practicing HCPs. The assessment was led by the Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders (SCWD) and was supported by in-country collaborating organizations.
A quantitative survey of 26 multiple-choice questions was completed by physicians, dietitians and other HCPs (n = 1545). Most HCPs (56.8%) recognize a consistent definition of anorexia of aging as a loss of appetite and/or low food intake. Cognitive changes/dementia (91%) and dysphagia (87%) are seen as the biggest risk factors. Most respondents were confident to give nutritional (62%) and physical activity (59.4%) recommendations and engaged caregivers such as family members in supporting older adults with anorexia (80.6%). Most clinicians assessed appetite at each visit (66.7%), although weight is not measured at every visit (41.5%). Apart from the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (39%), other tools to screen for appetite loss are not frequently used or no tools are used at all (29.4%). A high number of respondents (38.7%) believe that anorexia is a normal part of aging. Results show that treatment is focused on swallowing disorders (78%), dentition issues (76%) and increasing oral intake (fortified foods [75%] and oral nutritional supplements [74%]). Nevertheless, the lack of high-quality evidence is perceived as a barrier to optimal treatment (49.2%).
Findings from this international assessment highlight the challenges in the care of older adults with or at risk for anorexia of aging. Identifying professional practice gaps between individual HCPs and team-based gaps can provide a basis for healthcare education that is addressed at root causes, targeted to specific audiences and developed to improve individual and team practices that contribute to improving patient outcomes.

暂无摘要。

Purpose: This study surveyed physiotherapists working at Canadian cystic fibrosis (CF) specialized centres to investigate the current practice, barriers to, and facilitators of exercise testing and training. Method: Physiotherapists were recruited from 42 Canadian CF centres. They responded to an e-questionnaire regarding their practice. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Eighteen physiotherapists responded (estimated response rate of 23%); median years of clinical experience was 15 (range, min-max, 3-30) years. Aerobic testing was administered by 44% of respondents, strength testing by 39%, aerobic training by 78%, and strength training by 67%. The most frequently reported barriers across all four types of exercise testing and training were insufficient funding (reported by 56%-67% of respondents), time (50%-61%) and staff availability (56%). More late career than early career physiotherapists reported utilizing aerobic testing (50% vs. 33% of respondents), strength testing (75% vs. 33%), aerobic training (100% vs. 67%), and strength training (100% vs. 33%). Conclusions: Exercise testing and training is underutilized in Canadian CF centres. Experienced physiotherapists reported utilizing exercise testing and training more than less-experienced physiotherapists. Post-graduate education and mentorship, especially for less-experienced clinicians, are recommended to emphasize the importance of exercise testing and training. Barriers of funding, time, and staff availability should be addressed to further improve quality of care.
Objectif :sondage auprès de physiothérapeutes qui travaillent dans des centres canadiens spécialisés en fibrose kystique (FK) pour examiner les pratiques, les obstacles et les incitations actuels liés aux épreuves et aux entraînements à l’exercice. Méthodologie: les physiothérapeutes ont été recrutés dans 42 centres canadiens spécialisés en FK. Ils ont répondu à un questionnaire en ligne au sujet de leur pratique. Les données ont été analysées au moyen de statistiques descriptives. Résultats: les 18 physiothérapeutes qui ont répondu (taux de réponse estimatif de 23 %) avaient une médiane de 15 années d’expérience clinique (plage minimale-maximale de trois à 30 ans). Ainsi, 44 % des répondants effectuaient des épreuves d’endurance aérobique, 39 %, des épreuves en résistance, 78 %, un entraînement aérobique et 67 %, un entraînement en résistance. Les obstacles les plus signalés dans les quatre types d’épreuves et d’entraînement à l’exercice étaient un financement insuffisant (par 56 % à 67 % des répondants), le manque de temps (50 % à 61 %) et le peu de disponibilité du personnel (56 %). Plus de physiothérapeutes en fin de carrière qu’en début de carrière ont déclaré utiliser les épreuves d’endurance aérobique (50 % par rapport à 33 % des répondants), les épreuves de résistance (75 % par rapport à 33 %), l’entraînement aérobique (100 % par rapport à 67 %) et l’entraînement en résistance (100 % par rapport à 33 %). Conclusions:  l’épreuve et l’entraînement à l’exercice sont sous-utilisés dans les centres canadiens spécialisés en FK. Les physiothérapeutes d’expérience étaient plus nombreux à avoir déclaré utiliser l’épreuve et l’entraînement à l’exercice que les physiothérapeutes moins expérimentés. Les études supérieures et le mentorat, particulièrement chez les cliniciens moins expérimentés, sont recommandés pour insister sur l’importance de l’épreuve et de l’entraînement à l’exercice. Il faut corriger les obstacles au financement, au temps et à la disponibilité du personnel pour améliorer encore davantage la qualité des soins.