PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Bioscience subjects are essential as they allow nurses to have a clear understanding of the patient\'s condition and ultimately allow them to provide appropriate and timeous care. However, these subjects remain a significant problem in the endeavour to produce highly competent nurses.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the nursing students\' self-reported depth of understanding of bioscience and its relevance to clinical practice.
METHODS: A quantitative research approach using a descriptive survey design was employed. The sample (n = 211) included second-, third- and fourth-year undergraduate nursing students. A three-part self-administered questionnaire was adapted and used to collect the data. Data were analysed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences software version 25.0 (IBM SPSS-25). Descriptive statistics and Chi-squared test were performed to describe the relationship among the study variables.
RESULTS: Participants rated their understanding of the application of Human Biology (n = 86, 40.76%) and Pharmacology (n = 88, 41.71%) as good, while Physics (n = 80, 37.91%) and Chemistry (n = 85, 40.28%) were rated as adequate. Most participants rated Human Biology (n = 175, 83.73%) and Pharmacology (n = 181, 86.19%) as essential, while Physics (n = 129, 61.72%) and Chemistry (n = 133, 63.64%) were rated as relevant to clinical practice. Physics (n = 112, 60.54%; n = 95, 50.53%) and Chemistry (n = 126, 68.85%; n = 113 61.41%) were rated as not relevant to monitoring a patient\'s heart rate and blood pressure. Participants\' perception of the relevance of Chemistry in monitoring a patient\'s blood pressure was statistically significant (χ2 = 6.871 (df 2), p<0.05). Most participants (n = 57, 41.91%) performed at Task specific on Akinsanya\'s Bionursing model, suggesting an overall understanding of the foundational concepts and principles of bioscience.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study provided evidence of the students\' self-reported depth of understanding and perception of the relevance of bioscience and indicate a need for more emphasis on the importance of bioscience integration in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the nursing students\' self-reported depth of understanding of bioscience and its relevance to clinical practice.
METHODS: A quantitative research approach using a descriptive survey design was employed. The sample (n = 211) included second-, third- and fourth-year undergraduate nursing students. A three-part self-administered questionnaire was adapted and used to collect the data. Data were analysed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences software version 25.0 (IBM SPSS-25). Descriptive statistics and Chi-squared test were performed to describe the relationship among the study variables.
RESULTS: Participants rated their understanding of the application of Human Biology (n = 86, 40.76%) and Pharmacology (n = 88, 41.71%) as good, while Physics (n = 80, 37.91%) and Chemistry (n = 85, 40.28%) were rated as adequate. Most participants rated Human Biology (n = 175, 83.73%) and Pharmacology (n = 181, 86.19%) as essential, while Physics (n = 129, 61.72%) and Chemistry (n = 133, 63.64%) were rated as relevant to clinical practice. Physics (n = 112, 60.54%; n = 95, 50.53%) and Chemistry (n = 126, 68.85%; n = 113 61.41%) were rated as not relevant to monitoring a patient\'s heart rate and blood pressure. Participants\' perception of the relevance of Chemistry in monitoring a patient\'s blood pressure was statistically significant (χ2 = 6.871 (df 2), p<0.05). Most participants (n = 57, 41.91%) performed at Task specific on Akinsanya\'s Bionursing model, suggesting an overall understanding of the foundational concepts and principles of bioscience.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study provided evidence of the students\' self-reported depth of understanding and perception of the relevance of bioscience and indicate a need for more emphasis on the importance of bioscience integration in clinical practice.
摘要：
背景：生物科学科目是必不可少的，因为它们使护士能够清楚地了解患者的状况，并最终使他们能够提供适当和及时的护理。然而,在培养高素质护士的努力中，这些科目仍然是一个重大问题。
目的：本研究旨在调查护生自我报告对生物科学的理解深度及其与临床实践的相关性。
方法：采用描述性调查设计的定量研究方法。样本(n=211)包括第二-，第三年和第四年本科护理专业学生。修改了由三部分组成的自我管理问卷，并用于收集数据。使用IBM社会科学统计软件包软件版本25.0（IBMSPSS-25）分析数据。进行描述性统计和卡方检验来描述研究变量之间的关系。
结果：参与者对人类生物学（n=86，40.76％）和药理学（n=88，41.71％）的应用的理解良好，而物理学（n=80，37.91％）和化学（n=85，40.28％）被认为是足够的。大多数参与者认为人类生物学（n=175，83.73％）和药理学（n=181，86.19％）是必不可少的，而物理学（n=129，61.72％）和化学（n=133，63.64％）被评为与临床实践相关。物理（n=112，60.54％；n=95，50.53％）和化学（n=126，68.85％；n=11361.41％）被认为与监测患者的心率和血压无关。参与者对化学在监测患者血压中的相关性的看法具有统计学意义(χ2=6.871(df2)，p<0.05)。大多数参与者(n=57，41.91%)在Akinsanya的生物监测模型上执行了特定的任务，建议对生物科学的基本概念和原理有一个全面的理解。
结论：研究结果提供了学生自我报告的对生物科学相关性的理解和感知深度的证据，并表明需要更加强调生物科学整合在临床实践中的重要性。
目的：本研究旨在调查护生自我报告对生物科学的理解深度及其与临床实践的相关性。
方法：采用描述性调查设计的定量研究方法。样本(n=211)包括第二-，第三年和第四年本科护理专业学生。修改了由三部分组成的自我管理问卷，并用于收集数据。使用IBM社会科学统计软件包软件版本25.0（IBMSPSS-25）分析数据。进行描述性统计和卡方检验来描述研究变量之间的关系。
结果：参与者对人类生物学（n=86，40.76％）和药理学（n=88，41.71％）的应用的理解良好，而物理学（n=80，37.91％）和化学（n=85，40.28％）被认为是足够的。大多数参与者认为人类生物学（n=175，83.73％）和药理学（n=181，86.19％）是必不可少的，而物理学（n=129，61.72％）和化学（n=133，63.64％）被评为与临床实践相关。物理（n=112，60.54％；n=95，50.53％）和化学（n=126，68.85％；n=11361.41％）被认为与监测患者的心率和血压无关。参与者对化学在监测患者血压中的相关性的看法具有统计学意义(χ2=6.871(df2)，p<0.05)。大多数参与者(n=57，41.91%)在Akinsanya的生物监测模型上执行了特定的任务，建议对生物科学的基本概念和原理有一个全面的理解。
结论：研究结果提供了学生自我报告的对生物科学相关性的理解和感知深度的证据，并表明需要更加强调生物科学整合在临床实践中的重要性。
