Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

血小板与淋巴细胞比率
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    放射治疗(RT)仍然是治疗癌症的主要方法,在RT的背景下,已经研究了许多与肿瘤结局相关的癌症生物标志物。血清血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)是肿瘤学领域中新兴的标志性生物标志物之一。越来越多的证据表明,血清PLR升高可能是不良肿瘤特征的标志,接受RT的个体的不良治疗结局和治疗相关毒性。然而,这些调查的结果揭示了研究人员之间的一些差异,强调需要进一步精心策划的研究,以得出结论性的结果。本文对现代RT时代血清PLR的临床意义进行了全面的文献综述和深入探讨。
    Radiation therapy (RT) continues to be the primary approach for treating cancer, and numerous cancer biomarkers associated with oncological outcomes have been investigated in the context of RT. The serum platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is one of the emerging landmark biomarker in the oncologic field. Mounting evidence indicates that an elevated serum PLR may function as a marker of unfavorable tumor characteristics, adverse treatment outcomes and treatment-related toxicities among individuals undergoing RT. However, the findings of these investigations have revealed a few disparities among researchers, highlighting the need for further meticulously planned studies to draw conclusive results. This article provides a comprehensive literature review and in-depth discussion regarding the clinical implications of the serum PLR in the modern RT era.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癌细胞与免疫系统之间的相互作用在癌症进展和治疗中至关重要。在这方面,肿瘤免疫微环境和宏观环境,以全身性炎症标志物和TIL为标志,可能被认为是肿瘤的关键预后因素,包括口腔和肺鳞状细胞癌。
    方法:我们对口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)和肺鳞癌(LUSCC)患者进行了回顾性临床研究,检查阶段,合并症,治疗,和结果。我们评估了手术前全身炎症标志物和肿瘤微环境组成的预后意义。
    结果:发现全身性炎症标志物-NLR之间存在关联,MLR,以及PLR和肿瘤微环境因素,如TIL和CD8+细胞患病率升高的炎症标志物与晚期相关。具体来说,NLR在OSCC中具有预后性,而PLR在LUSCC中是预后的。使用截止值,我们将肿瘤样本分为两个预后组.此外,TIL水平>15%的肿瘤基质与OSCC和LUSCC的总生存期延长相关,而CD8+表达增加与LUSCC无病生存期延长相关。
    结论:系统性炎症标志物和TILs可能是有价值的生存预后因素,强调免疫反应在OSCC和LUSCC中的作用。尽管由于缺乏标准化,所提出的队列的临床整合有限,我们得出结论,分析肿瘤免疫谱可能提供新的预后见解.
    结论:未来整合到癌症分类中可以改善风险分层和治疗指导。
    BACKGROUND: The interplay between cancer cells and the immune system is crucial in cancer progression and treatment. In this regard, the tumor immune microenvironment and macroenvironment, marked by systemic inflammation markers and TILs, could be considered key prognostic factors in tumors, including oral and lung squamous cell carcinoma.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective clinical study on patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) and Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LUSCC), examining stages, comorbidities, treatments, and outcomes. We evaluated the prognostic significance of pre-surgical systemic inflammation markers and tumor microenvironment composition.
    RESULTS: Associations were found between systemic inflammation markers-NLR, MLR, and PLR-and tumor microenvironment factors, such as TILs and CD8+ cell prevalence-elevated inflammation markers correlated with advanced stages. Specifically, NLR was prognostic in OSCC, whereas PLR was prognostic in LUSCC. Using a cutoff value, we divided our tumor samples into two prognostic groups. Moreover, TILs levels >15% of tumor stroma correlated with prolonged overall survival in both OSCC and LUSCC, while increased CD8+ expression was linked to extended disease-free survival in LUSCC.
    CONCLUSIONS: Systemic inflammation markers and TILs can be valuable prognostic factors of survival, highlighting the immune response\'s role in OSCC and LUSCC. Despite limited clinical integration of the presented cohorts due to a lack of standardization, we concluded that analyzing tumor immune profiles may offer novel prognostic insights.
    CONCLUSIONS: Future integration into cancer classification could improve risk stratification and treatment guidance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨mSEPT9联合NLR的临床诊断价值。CRC中的PLR和LMR。
    方法:由120例CRC患者组成的329名受试者,前瞻性招募了105名息肉患者和104名健康参与者。收集并分析临床病理特征。收集血浆样品的mSEPT9,NLR,PLR和LMR测试。敏感性,通过ROC曲线评估单独或组合的每种生物标志物的特异性和AUC。
    结果:NLR的水平,CRC患者的mSEPT9的PLR和PDR明显高于非CRC受试者,而LMR则相反。CRC患者mSEPT9的PDR与年龄显著相关,肿瘤大小,肿瘤分期和M期。ROC曲线分析显示mSEPT9、NLR、CRC患者的PLR和LMR的AUC为0.78(Se=0.68,Sp=0.89),0.78(Se=0.68,Sp=0.83),0.80(Se=0.68,Sp=0.81),和0.77(Se=0.72,Sp=0.73),分别。此外,这四种生物标志物的组合显着提高了CRC的诊断准确性(AUC=0.92,Se=0.90和Sp=0.87),尤其是对于具有大肿瘤(AUC=0.95)或远端转移(AUC=0.95)的CRC患者。
    结论:mSEPT9,NLR,PLR和LMR显示可能是诊断CRC的可靠生物标志物。这些生物标志物的联合应用进一步提高了CRC的诊断准确性。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate clinical diagnostic values of mSEPT9 combined with NLR, PLR and LMR in CRC.
    METHODS: 329 subjects composed of 120 CRC patients, 105 polyps patients and 104 healthy participants were prospectively recruited. Clinicopathologic features were collected and analyzed. Plasma samples were collected for mSEPT9, NLR, PLR and LMR test. The sensitivity, specificity and AUC of each biomarker separately or in combination were estimated by the ROC curve.
    RESULTS: The levels of NLR, PLR and the PDR of mSEPT9 in CRC patients were significantly higher than those in non-CRC subjects, while LMR was the opposite. The PDR of mSEPT9 in CRC patients was significantly correlated with age, tumor size, tumor stage and M stage. ROC curve analysis demonstrated moderate diagnostic values of mSEPT9, NLR, PLR and LMR in CRC patients with AUC of 0.78 (Se = 0.68, and Sp = 0.89), 0.78 (Se = 0.68, and Sp = 0.83), 0.80 (Se = 0.68, and Sp = 0.81), and 0.77 (Se = 0.72, and Sp = 0.73), respectively. Moreover, combination of these four biomarkers dramatically enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of CRC (AUC = 0.92, Se = 0.90, and Sp = 0.87), especially for CRC patients with large tumors (AUC = 0.95) or distal metastasis (AUC = 0.95).
    CONCLUSIONS: mSEPT9, NLR, PLR and LMR showed the potential to be reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis of CRC. And the combined application of these biomarkers further improved the diagnostic accuracy of CRC significantly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在比较mSEPT9与四种血液标志物(CEA,CA19-9,血小板淋巴细胞比(PLR)和中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比(NLR)。此外,我们的目的是确定mSEPT9,CEA,CA19-9、PLR和NLR在结直肠癌中的表达。
    方法:总共567名参与者被纳入研究,包括308例CRC患者,经结肠镜检查和/或组织活检证实的61例结直肠息肉患者和198例健康受试者。收集血浆样品用于测试。
    结果:结直肠息肉组mSEPT9阳性率(71.8%)明显高于正常对照组(6.1%)(P<0.001)。CEA的水平,CRC组CA19-9、NLR和PLR明显高于非CRC组(P<0.05)。ROC曲线对比分析显示mSEPT9单独对CRC的诊断效能明显高于CEA,CA19-9,NLR和PLR单独。mSEPT9与CEA的组合,CA19-9和PLR显示出优越的诊断价值。此外,二元logistic回归也用于建立更好的CRC临床诊断模型.在单变量分析中,年龄,mSEPT9,CEA,CA19-9、PLR和NLR是CRC的独立预测因子。当这些协变量在多变量模型中拟合时,mSEPT9、CEA、CA19-9和PLR更可能患有CRC。
    结论:这项研究揭示了mSEPT9状态与CRC患者的临床病理特征之间的显著关联,以及mSEPT9,CEA,CA19-9和PLR可显著提高CRC的诊断效能。
    BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of mSEPT9 to four blood markers (CEA, CA19-9, platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)). In addition, we aimed to determine the combined diagnostic efficacy of mSEPT9, CEA, CA19-9, PLR and NLR in colorectal cancer.
    METHODS: A total of 567 participants were enrolled in the study, including 308 CRC patients, 61 colorectal polyp patients and 198 healthy subjects confirmed by colonoscopy and/or tissue biopsy. Plasma samples were collected for tests.
    RESULTS: The positive rate of mSEPT9 in CRC (71.8%) was markedly higher than that in either the colorectal polyps group (27.9%) or the healthy controls (6.1%) (P < 0.001). The levels of CEA, CA19-9, NLR and PLR in the CRC group were significantly higher than those in the non-CRC groups (P < 0.05). ROC curves comparison analyses showed that the diagnostic efficacy of mSEPT9 alone in CRC was significantly higher than CEA, CA19-9, NLR and PLR alone. The combination of mSEPT9 with CEA, CA19-9 and PLR showed superior diagnostic value. In addition, binary logistic regression was also used to build a better model for clinical diagnosis of CRC. On univariable analyses, age, mSEPT9, CEA, CA 19-9, PLR and NLR were independent predictors of CRC. When these covariates were fitted in multivariable models, the ones with positive detection of mSEPT9, CEA, CA 19-9 and PLR were more likely to have CRC.
    CONCLUSIONS: This research revealed a significant association between mSEPT9 status and the clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients, and the combination of mSEPT9, CEA, CA19-9 and PLR could significantly improve diagnostic efficacy in CRC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的临床和血清学表现广泛,缺乏公认的诊断标准,更准确的生物标志物。来自全血细胞计数的血液学指标,特别是中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR),在SLE中表现出希望;然而,缺乏对其诊断准确性的严格评估。我们试图通过对SLE中NLR和PLR的诊断准确性进行系统评价和荟萃分析来解决这一问题。电子数据库PubMed,Scopus,和WebofScience从开始到2024年3月15日系统地检索了报告NLR和PLR的敏感性和特异性的研究,通过受试者工作特性(ROC)曲线分析获得,对于SLE的存在,疾病严重程度,器官受累(狼疮性肾炎,心包炎,和胸膜疾病),和并发症(感染)。使用JBI关键评估清单(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024531446)评估偏倚风险。NLR对SLE的诊断表现出良好的准确性(8项研究;曲线下面积,AUC=0.81,95%CI0.78-0.85)和狼疮性肾炎(九项研究;AUC=0.81,95%CI0.77-0.84),但不适用于严重疾病(9项研究;AUC=0.69,95%CI0.65-0.73)或感染(6项研究;AUC=0.73,95%CI0.69-0.77)。PLR对严重疾病的诊断具有良好的准确性(六项研究;AUC=0.85,95%CI0.81-0.87)。没有足够的研究来评估PLR诊断SLE的准确性。狼疮性肾炎,或感染。没有研究调查患有心包炎或胸膜疾病的SLE患者的NLR和PLR。因此,NLR和PLR对SLE和狼疮性肾炎(NLR)以及严重疾病(PLR)的诊断准确率相对较高.需要进一步的研究来确定NLR和PLR是否,结合临床评估和其他血清学生物标志物,可以提高SLE的诊断和管理。
    The wide range of clinical and serological manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the lack of accepted diagnostic criteria warrant the identification of novel, more accurate biomarkers. Hematological indices derived from full blood cell counts, particularly the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have shown promise in SLE; however, a critical appraisal of their diagnostic accuracy is lacking. We sought to address this issue by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the NLR and PLR in SLE. The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to 15 March 2024 for studies reporting the sensitivity and specificity of the NLR and PLR, obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, for the presence of SLE, disease severity, organ involvement (lupus nephritis, pericarditis, and pleural disease), and complications (infections). The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024531446). The NLR exhibited good accuracy for the diagnosis of SLE (eight studies; area under the curve, AUC = 0.81, 95% CI 0.78-0.85) and lupus nephritis (nine studies; AUC = 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.84), but not for severe disease (nine studies; AUC = 0.69, 95% CI 0.65-0.73) or infections (six studies; AUC = 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.77). The PLR exhibited good accuracy for the diagnosis of severe disease (six studies; AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.87). There were an insufficient number of studies to assess the accuracy of the PLR for the diagnosis of SLE, lupus nephritis, or infections. No study investigated the NLR and PLR in SLE patients with pericarditis or pleural disease. Therefore, the NLR and the PLR have a relatively high diagnostic accuracy for the presence of SLE and lupus nephritis (NLR) and severe disease (PLR). Further studies are warranted to determine whether the NLR and PLR, in combination with clinical evaluation and other serological biomarkers, can enhance the diagnosis and management of SLE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)与非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)和肝硬化之间的关联尚不清楚,并且仍然没有有效的方法来诊断或监测疾病进展。
    收集来自国家健康和营养检查调查的数据进行分析。使用Logistic回归和限制性三次样条来评估不同人群中PLR与NAFLD和肝硬化之间的关联。使用曲线下面积接收器工作特征(AUCROC)来区分模型。通过构建两分段线性回归进行阈值分析。在拐点的任一侧分别进行相关分析。
    共包括5724名成年人。Logistic回归分析显示PLR与NAFLD和肝硬化相关(NAFLDAUCROC:0.803;肝硬化AUCROC:0.851)。PLR预测NAFLD发病率的AUCROC在糖尿病人群中为0.762,在非糖尿病人群中为0.804。高PLR预测糖尿病人群的肝硬化,AUCROC为0.824,而在非糖尿病人群中,高PLR与肝硬化无关.受限三次样条显示PLR和NAFLD发生率之间呈负线性相关。NAFLD的PLR拐点为180.74。PLR≤180.74具有统计学意义(比值比=0.997,95%置信区间=0.995-0.999)。在NAFLD人群中,PLR≤130.5时,PLR与肝硬化呈负相关(比值比=0.987,95%置信区间=0.977-0.996),PLR>130.5时与肝硬化呈正相关(比值比=1.006,95%置信区间=1.001-1.012).
    在美国人群中,PLR和NAFLD呈负相关。在NAFLD人群中,PLR与肝硬化呈U型关系。PLR在监测NAFLD患者进展为肝硬化方面具有潜在价值。
    UNASSIGNED: The associations between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and cirrhosis are unclear, and there are still no effective means for diagnosing or monitoring disease progression.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were collected for analysis. Logistic regression and restricted cubic splines were used to evaluate the associations between PLR and NAFLD and cirrhosis in different populations. The Area Under Curve Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUCROC) was used to distinguish the models. Threshold analysis was performed by constructing a two-piecewise linear regression. Correlation analysis was performed separately on either side of the inflection point.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 5724 adults were included. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the PLR was associated with NAFLD and cirrhosis (AUCROC of NAFLD: 0.803; AUCROC of cirrhosis: 0.851). The AUCROC of the PLR for predicting NAFLD incidence was 0.762 in the diabetic population and 0.804 in the nondiabetic population. High PLR predicted cirrhosis in the diabetic population, with an AUCROC of 0.824, whereas a high PLR was not associated with cirrhosis in the nondiabetic population. The restricted cubic spline revealed a negative linear correlation between the PLR and NAFLD incidence. The inflection point of the PLR for NAFLD was 180.74. A PLR ≤180.74 was statistically significant (odds ratio=0.997, 95% confidence interval=0.995-0.999). In the NAFLD population, the PLR was negatively correlated with cirrhosis at a PLR ≤130.5 (odds ratio=0.987, 95% confidence interval=0.977-0.996) and positively correlated with cirrhosis at a PLR > 130.5 (odds ratio=1.006, 95% confidence interval=1.001-1.012).
    UNASSIGNED: The PLR and NAFLD were negatively correlated in the U.S. population. The PLR had a U-shaped relationship with cirrhosis in the NAFLD population. The PLR has potential value in monitoring NAFLD patient progression to cirrhosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在确定CA125,HE4,全身免疫炎症指数(SII)的诊断准确性,预后营养指数(PNI),纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比值(FAR),中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR),血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR),单核细胞与淋巴细胞比率(MLR),并结合卵巢癌(OC)的6种炎症营养标志物,确定OC早期诊断的最佳诊断指标。进行了广泛的研究,以建立这些指标与OC的病理方面之间的联系。
    本研究共纳入170人,其中87例诊断为OC,83例诊断为良性卵巢肿瘤(BOTs)。通过计算灵敏度评估变量的诊断能力,特异性,和ROC曲线下的面积。通过使用DCA,我们评估了变量在鉴别卵巢肿块中的临床价值。
    所有标记物对OC显示出显著的诊断能力。CA125,HE4,SII,远,从BOTs组到早期OC组,MLR水平显着增加。与早期OC组相比,晚期OC组的PNI值显着降低,但CA125,HE4,SII,NLR,远。此外,有淋巴结转移的OC组CA125、HE4、SII、NLR,PLR,远,与非转移组相比,而PNI水平明显较低。分类因素,如组织学分级和病理分类,CA125和HE4水平显示明显差异。NLR在病理类型组之间有显著差异。在六种炎症营养标志物中,FAR显示最大诊断值。在逻辑回归分析中,观察到,包含所有6种炎症-营养标记物的组合标记物表现出比任何单个标记物显著更高的AUC值(0.881;95%CI,0.823-0.926).
    PNI,NLR,PLR,MLR,SII,FAR对OC表现出优异的诊断性能。与每个个体相比,这些标记物的组合显示出优异的诊断能力。全身炎症指标可能有助于OC的诊断。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CA125, HE4, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and the combination of the six inflammatory-nutritional markers for ovarian cancer (OC) to identify the best diagnostic indicator for OC early diagnosis. An extensive study was performed to establish the connection between these indicators and the pathological aspects of OC.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 170 individuals were included in this study, with 87 diagnosed with OC and 83 with benign ovarian tumors (BOTs). The diagnostic abilities of the variables were evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curves. Through the use of DCA, we evaluated the variables\' clinical value in the discrimination of ovarian masses.
    UNASSIGNED: All markers showed significant diagnostic power for OC. CA125, HE4, SII, FAR, and MLR levels significantly increased from the BOTs group to the early-stage OC group. The advanced-stage OC group had significantly lower PNI values compared to the early-stage OC group but significantly higher levels of CA125, HE4, SII, NLR, and FAR. Moreover, the OC group with lymph node metastasis exhibited significantly higher levels of CA125, HE4, SII, NLR, PLR, and FAR, in contrast to the non-metastatic group, while PNI levels were significantly lower. Categorical factors, such as histological grade and pathological classification, showed noticeable discrepancies in CA125 and HE4 levels. NLR was significantly different among the pathological type groups. Among the six inflammatory-nutritional markers, the FAR displayed the greatest diagnostic value. In the analysis of logistic regression, it was observed that a combination marker containing all six inflammatory-nutritional markers exhibited a notably higher AUC value (0.881; 95% CI, 0.823 - 0.926) than any of the individual marker.
    UNASSIGNED: PNI, NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, and FAR showed excellent diagnostic performance for OC. The combination of these markers demonstrated a superior diagnostic capability compared to each individual one. The systemic inflammatory indicators may be helpful to diagnose OC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞之比(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞之比(PLR)是新的炎症指标,可用于预测各种疾病的严重程度和预后。我们根据病因将急性胰腺炎分为急性胆源性胰腺炎(ABP)和高甘油三酯血症引起的急性胰腺炎(HTGP)。
    目的:探讨NLR和PLR在评估HTGP和ABP持续性器官衰竭(POF)中的临床意义。
    方法:选取2012年1月至2023年1月在山西省白求恩医院首次诊断为急性胰腺炎(AP)的1450例患者。根据AP的病因将患者分为两组:530例患者为ABP,241例患者为HTGP。我们收集并比较了患者的临床资料,包括NLR,PLR,和AP预后评分系统,入院后48小时内。
    结果:ABP组的NLR(9.1vs6.9,P<0.001)和PLR(203.1vs160.5,P<0.001)明显高于HTGP组。在HTGP组中,在重度AP患者和SOFA评分≥3的患者中,NLR和PLR均显著升高.同样,在ABP组中,严重AP患者的NLR和PLR显著升高,改良计算机断层扫描严重度指数评分≥4,日本严重度评分≥3,改良马歇尔评分≥2。此外,NLR和PLR对ABP和HTGP组POF的发展均具有预测价值。
    结论:NLR和PLR在ABP和HTGP之间有所不同,与AP预后评分系统密切相关,并且在ABP和HTGP中均具有POF发生的预测潜力。
    BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are novel inflammatory indicators that can be used to predict the severity and prognosis of various diseases. We categorize acute pancreatitis by etiology into acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) and hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTGP).
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical significance of NLR and PLR in assessing persistent organ failure (POF) in HTGP and ABP.
    METHODS: A total of 1450 patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis (AP) for the first time at Shanxi Bethune Hospital between January 2012 and January 2023 were enrolled. The patients were categorized into two groups according to the etiology of AP: ABP in 530 patients and HTGP in 241 patients. We collected and compared the clinical data of the patients, including NLR, PLR, and AP prognostic scoring systems, within 48 h of hospital admission.
    RESULTS: The NLR (9.1 vs 6.9, P < 0.001) and PLR (203.1 vs 160.5, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the ABP group than in the HTGP group. In the HTGP group, both NLR and PLR were significantly increased in patients with severe AP and those with a SOFA score ≥ 3. Likewise, in the ABP group, NLR and PLR were significantly elevated in patients with severe AP, modified computed tomography severity index score ≥ 4, Japanese Severity Score ≥ 3, and modified Marshall score ≥ 2. Moreover, NLR and PLR showed predictive value for the development of POF in both the ABP and HTGP groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: NLR and PLR vary between ABP and HTGP, are strongly associated with AP prognostic scoring systems, and have predictive potential for the occurrence of POF in both ABP and HTGP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了确定急性带状疱疹(HZ)患者的带状疱疹后遗神经痛(PHN)的风险,本研究通过纳入相关的外周血炎症指标,建立并验证了一种新型的临床预测模型.
    在2019年1月至2023年6月之间,将209例急性HZ患者分为PHN组(n=62)和非PHN组(n=147)。进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定作为PHN发展独立预测因子的危险因素。随后,建立了列线图预测模型,并使用接收器工作特性曲线评估判别能力和校准,校准图,和决策曲线分析(DCA)。通过Bootstrap测试方法在内部验证了列线图模型。
    根据单变量逻辑回归分析,五个变量,即年龄,高血压,急性期数字评定量表(NRS-11)评分,血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR),全身免疫炎症指数,与PHN发育显著相关。多因素分析进一步揭示了年龄(优势比(OR)[95%置信区间(CI)]:2.309[1.163-4.660]),急性期NRS-11评分(OR[95%CI]:2.837[1.294-6.275]),和PLR(OR[95%CI]:1.015[1.010-1.022])是PHN的独立危险因素。将这三个预测因子进行整合以建立预测模型并构造列线图。用于预测PHN风险的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.787,使用Bootstrap方法确定的内部验证的AUC为0.776。DCA和校准曲线还表明,列线图模型的预测性能值得称赞。
    在这项研究中,建立并验证了风险预测模型,以准确预测HZ后PHN的概率,从而表现出有利的歧视,校准,和临床适用性。
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the risk of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) in patients with acute herpes zoster (HZ), this study developed and validated a novel clinical prediction model by incorporating a relevant peripheral blood inflammation indicator.
    UNASSIGNED: Between January 2019 and June 2023, 209 patients with acute HZ were categorized into the PHN group (n = 62) and the non-PHN group (n = 147). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors serving as independent predictors of PHN development. Subsequently, a nomogram prediction model was established, and the discriminative ability and calibration were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The nomogram model was internally verified through the bootstrap test method.
    UNASSIGNED: According to univariate logistic regression analyses, five variables, namely age, hypertension, acute phase Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) score, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune inflammation index, were significantly associated with PHN development. Multifactorial analysis further unveiled that age (odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 2.309 [1.163-4.660]), acute phase NRS-11 score (OR [95% CI]: 2.837 [1.294-6.275]), and PLR (OR [95% CI]: 1.015 [1.010-1.022]) were independent risk factors for PHN. These three predictors were integrated to establish the prediction model and construct the nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting the PHN risk was 0.787, and the AUC of internal validation determined using the bootstrap method was 0.776. The DCA and calibration curve also indicated that the predictive performance of the nomogram model was commendable.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, a risk prediction model was developed and validated to accurately forecast the probability of PHN after HZ, thereby demonstrating favorable discrimination, calibration, and clinical applicability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:心脏自主神经病变(CAN)是糖尿病最严重的并发症之一。本研究采用24小时动态心电图分析2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与CAN的相关性,评估NLR与糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)严重程度的关系。
    方法:本横断面研究纳入了经神经传导研究(NCS)证实的90例DPN患者。进行24小时动态心电图以检测心率变异性(HRV)的降低。实验室参数,包括空腹血糖,肌酐,胆固醇,甘油三酯,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平,以及CBC,中性粒细胞,淋巴细胞,NLR,和血小板淋巴细胞比率(PLR),进行了相应的计算。进行白蛋白-肌酐比(ACR)测试,并计算估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)。通过存在蛋白尿(≥30mg/g肌酐)和/或eGFR小于60来诊断慢性肾脏疾病。
    结果:根据24小时动态心电图,90例患者中有25例(27.7%)患有CAN。在比较CAN和非CAN组时,CAN组有较高的HbA1C(p=0.005),较高的NLR(p=0.014),和更高的中性粒细胞(p=0.10)。此外,CAN组PLR高于非CAN组,但这没有统计学意义(p=0.180).接收器操作员特征曲线分析显示,截止值为1.7的NLR成功检测到CAN患者。
    结论:NLR可用作一种廉价且易于获得的标志物,用于检测有发生CAN风险的糖尿病患者。
    OBJECTIVE: Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is one of the most serious complications of diabetes. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and CAN in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using 24-hour Holter ECG and to assess the relationship between NLR and severity of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).
    METHODS:  This cross-sectional study included 90 T2D patients with DPN confirmed by nerve conduction study (NCS). A 24-hour Holter ECG was done to detect the decrease in heart rate variability (HRV). Laboratory parameters, including fasting blood glucose, creatinine, cholesterol, triglyceride, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, as well as CBC, neutrophils, lymphocytes, NLR, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), were calculated accordingly. An albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) test was done and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated. Chronic kidney disease was diagnosed by the presence of albuminuria (≥30 mg/g creatinine) and/or eGFR less than 60.
    RESULTS: Based on the 24-hour Holter ECG, 25 patients out of 90 (27.7%) had CAN. On comparing both the CAN and non-CAN groups, the CAN group had higher HbA1C (p = 0.005), higher NLR (p = 0.014), and higher neutrophils (p = 0.10). Also, PLR was higher in the CAN group than in the non-CAN group, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.180). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis revealed that NLR with a cutoff of 1.7 succeeded in detecting patients with CAN.
    CONCLUSIONS: NLR can be used as an inexpensive and accessible marker to detect patients with diabetes at risk for developing CAN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号