Pilonidal sinus disease

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景鼻窦病(PSD)是一种由毛发滞留引起的慢性皮肤病,影响骶尾部裂隙。这项研究的目的是比较负压伤口疗法(NPWT)与常规日常敷料(DDs)在复杂或感染的藏毛窦道切除术后伤口愈合中的疗效。材料和方法该研究包括81名患有复杂或感染的毛发窦的广泛局部切除的个体。随机选择的参与者给予NPWT或常规敷料。在两组之间,住院时间,恢复日常活动所需的时间,并比较了完全闭合伤口所需的时间。结果42例患者接受NPWT,39例患者照常接受DDs。两组在手术时间或住院时间方面没有明显差异。然而,接受NPWT的患者最终伤口闭合速度更快(与常规DD相比,为59.24±10.21天,平均时间为75.31±14.68天,P=0.001),并较早恢复到正常活动(NPWT和常规DD的17.36天与21.75天,分别)。结论与接受标准DDs的患者相比,术后接受NPWT治疗的患者伤口愈合更快,恢复正常活动.只要可行,这一策略可用于改善患者康复.
    Background Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic skin condition caused by hair retention that affects the sacrococcygeal cleft. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to routine daily dressings (DDs) in wound healing after complex or infected pilonidal sinus tract excision. Materials and methods The study included 81 individuals who had extensive local excisions for pilonidal sinuses that were complex or infected. Randomly selected participants were given either NPWT or the usual dressing. Between the two groups, the length of hospitalization, the amount of time needed to resume daily activities, and the amount of time needed for full wound closure were compared. Results Forty-two patients received NPWT, while 39 patients received DDs as usual. There was no discernible difference between the two groups in terms of operating time or hospital stay. However, patients who underwent NPWT experienced a quicker final wound closure (59.24 ± 10.21 days compared to routine DD with a mean time of 75.31 ± 14.68 days, P = 0.001) and returned to normal activities earlier (17.36 versus 21.75 days in NPWT and routine DD, respectively). Conclusion Compared to patients who received standard DDs, those who were postoperatively managed with NPWT showed faster wound healing and return to normal activities. Whenever feasible, this strategy may be employed to improve patient recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    在过去的几年中,针对毛发窦疾病(PSD)的非切除技术已越来越受欢迎。这项研究的目的是回顾非切除技术的短期和长期结果,特别关注窦腔内壁治疗的累加效应以及原发性和复发性PSD之间的差异。在Embase进行了系统的搜索,Medline,WebofScience核心合集,Cochrane和GoogleScholar数据库,用于研究PSD的非切除技术,包括带有或不带有额外激光或苯酚处理的凹坑拾取技术,拆除屋顶,内镜技术和凝血酶明胶基质的应用。结果是复发率,治愈率,并发症发生率,伤口愈合时间和恢复日常活动所需的时间。总的来说,包括8100名患者的31项研究。非切除技术的总体治愈率为67%至100%。取坑的复发率,根据后续时间,去屋顶和明胶基质的应用从0到16%不等。附加激光后的复发率,苯酚和内镜技术从0到29%不等。并发症发生率从0到16%不等,伤口愈合时间在3到47天之间。恢复日常活动的时间从一到九天不等。非切除技术与快速恢复和低发病率相关,但复发率高。尝试额外治疗鼻窦内衬的技术比单独进行凹陷摘除的复发率更差。原发性疾病和复发性疾病之间的复发率没有差异。
    Non-excisional techniques for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) have gained popularity over the last years. The aim of this study was to review short and long-term outcomes for non-excisional techniques with special focus on the additive effect of treatment of the inner lining of the sinus cavity and the difference between primary and recurrent PSD. A systematic search was conducted in Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases for studies on non-excisional techniques for PSD including pit picking techniques with or without additional laser or phenol treatment, unroofing, endoscopic techniques and thrombin gelatin matrix application. Outcomes were recurrence rates, healing rates, complication rates, wound healing times and time taken to return to daily activities. In total, 31 studies comprising 8100 patients were included. Non-excisional techniques had overall healing rates ranging from 67 to 100%. Recurrence rates for pit picking, unroofing and gelatin matrix application varied from 0 to 16% depending on the follow-up time. Recurrence rates after additional laser, phenol and endoscopic techniques varied from 0 to 29%. Complication rates ranged from 0 to 16%, and the wound healing time was between three and forty-seven days. The return to daily activities varied from one to nine days. Non-excisional techniques are associated with fast recovery and low morbidity but recurrence rates are high. Techniques that attempt to additionally treat the inner lining of the sinus have worse recurrence rates than pit picking alone. Recurrence rates do not differ between primary and recurrent disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:手术引流管破裂是术后使用引流系统的一个不寻常的负面后果。虽然很罕见,文献中记录了多种管理方法。
    方法:一名19岁男性患者,有复发性藏毛窦疾病史,手术间隔4个月两次。他到我们医院接受术后随访,在此期间对插入的引流管进行了评估。在抽出排水管的同时,它的一部分被损坏和遗漏。通过腰骶区域计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描评估错位引流的位置。决定使用介入放射学技术进行侵入性较小的方法,以避免广泛切除和切口重新开放的并发症以及延长的愈合时间。进行透视检查以创建三维前外侧,正面后视图。然后通过微创技术成功回收了破碎的引流。术后时间顺利。
    结论:排水碎裂和/或移位是一项极具挑战性的事件,需要高度创新的干预措施。开放手术技术和内窥镜方法有多种治疗选择。
    结论:本案例强调了透视作为一种出色的有效选择的潜在作用,可以在局部麻醉下在床边迅速安全地进行,并减少患者的住院时间。
    BACKGROUND: Fragmentation of the surgical drain is an unusual negative consequence of using a drainage system postoperatively. Even though it is rare, multiple management approaches were documented in the literature.
    METHODS: A 19-year-old male patient who had a history of recurrent pilonidal sinus disease that was operated on twice 4 months apart. He presented to our hospital for postoperative follow-up, during which the inserted drain was assessed. While withdrawing the drain, part of it was damaged and missed. The location of the misplaced drain was assessed by a lumbosacral region computed tomography (CT) scan. The decision was made to proceed with less invasive methods using interventional radiology techniques to avoid wide excision and incision reopening complications and prolonged healing time. A fluoroscopy procedure was performed to create three-dimensional anterolateral, frontal posterior views. Then the fragmented drain was retrieved successfully by a minimally invasive technique. The postoperative period was uneventful.
    CONCLUSIONS: Drain fragmentation and/or dislodgement is a highly challenging event that requires highly innovative intervention. Multiple treatment options are available as open surgery techniques and endoscopic approaches.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the potential role of fluoroscopy as an outstanding effective choice that could be carried out promptly and safely at the bedside under local anesthetic and reduce the patient\'s hospital stay.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在报告有关小儿内镜下藏毛窦治疗(PEPSiT)结果的多中心国家经验。所有儿科病人的医疗记录,18岁以下,在2019-2021年期间接受PEPSiT的患者进行了回顾性审查。患者人口统计学,操作细节,并对术后结果进行评估.共有294名患者(182名男孩),年龄中位数为14岁(10-18岁),在研究期间接受PEPSiT,已注册。鼻窦病(PSD)主要为258例(87.8%),复发为36例(12.2%)。中位手术时间为36分钟(范围11-120)。中位VAS疼痛评分为0.86(范围0-3),镇痛药使用的中位持续时间为27h(范围12-60)。总体成功率为95.2%(280/294),完全愈合的中位时间为23.4天(范围19-50)。6/294(2.0%)患者出现Clavien2术后并发症。复发率为4.8%(14/294),所有复发均使用PEPSiT重新手术。对一名(0.3%)愈合较晚的患者进行了伤口清创的重新手术。在多变量分析中,多毛症和鼻窦类型(小窝≥2,旁正中和更近肛门)是PSD复发的预测因子(p=0.001).迄今为止,这是儿科人群中发表的最大的PEPSiT系列。3年经验后报告的结果证实PEPSiT是安全的,有效,和真正的微创手术来治疗青少年PSD。它为患者提供了快速和无痛的恢复,令人满意的成功,和高质量的生活。
    This study aimed to report a multicentric national experience about the outcomes of pediatric endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (PEPSiT). The medical records of all pediatric patients, aged up to 18 years, who underwent PEPSiT in the period 2019-2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients\' demographics, operative details, and post-operative outcomes were assessed. A total of 294 patients (182 boys), with median age of 14 years (range 10-18), receiving PEPSiT in the study period, were enrolled. Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) was primary in 258 (87.8%) and recurrent in 36 (12.2%). The median operative time was 36 min (range 11-120). The median VAS pain score was 0.86 (range 0-3) and the median duration of analgesic use was 27 h (range 12-60). The overall success rate was 95.2% (280/294) and the median time to full healing was 23.4 days (range 19-50). Six/294 (2.0%) patients developed Clavien 2 post-operative complications. The recurrence rate was 4.8% (14/294) and all recurrences were re-operated using PEPSiT. Redo-surgery for wound debridement was performed in one (0.3%) patient with late healing. On multivariate analysis, hirsutism and typology of sinus (pits ≥ 2, paramedian and more proximal to the anus) were predictors of PSD recurrence (p = 0.001). To date, this is the largest series of PEPSiT published in the pediatric population. The outcomes reported after a 3 years experience confirm that PEPSiT is a safe, effective, and real minimally invasive procedure to treat adolescents with PSD. It provides patients quick and painless recovery, satisfactory success, and high quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:鼻窦病(PSD),一种常见的新生儿裂隙炎症引起的发病率,尤其是在年轻人中,是一个异质性疾病组,对其最佳治疗没有共识。我们的目的是报告原发性PSD手术的长期结果。
    方法:我们回顾性研究了2010年11月至2015年10月期间146例接受原发性PSD手术的患者的病历。其中,113例接受了微创挖坑手术(PSS)(n=55)或局部皮瓣不对称切除术(AELF)(n=58);我们专注于这两个亚组的结果。
    结果:接受微创PPS的PSD患者在日间手术中更容易成功(94.5%vs32.8%,p<0.001),术后并发症较少(9.4%vs36.2%,p=0.002),病假较短(中位数为14天vs21天,p<0.001)比AELF患者高。然而,在术后第一次随访时,两种手术方法愈合相似(75.0%vs76.8%,p=0.83)。我们的长期随访,中位数为9.3年(范围5.4-10.6),透露,然而,PPS后复发率明显高于AELF后(50.9%vs10.3%,HR6.65,p<0.001)。
    结论:PPS,这是一种微创手术技术,通常在局部麻醉下进行,适用于主PSD,尽管在我们的研究中复发率很高,请记住,患者的选择是一个重要的考虑因素。具有简单窦形成的原发性PSD可能受益于PPS。另一方面,在我们的研究中,无论最初的缓慢恢复情况如何,伴有复杂窦道形成的原发性PSD都可能受益于AELF.因为PSD是一种非常异质性的疾病,患者有不同的危险因素,外科医生必须掌握几种不同的手术技术。需要一种分类系统来帮助外科医生为每个患者选择正确的手术技术。
    BACKGROUND: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), a common inflammatory condition of the natal cleft causing morbidity especially in young adults, is a heterogeneous disease group with no consensus regarding its best treatment. Our aim was to report long-term results for primary PSD surgery.
    METHODS: We retrospectively studied the medical records of 146 patients who underwent primary PSD surgery between November 2010 and October 2015. Of these, 113 underwent either the mini-invasive pit-picking surgery (PSS) (n = 55) or asymmetrical excision with local flap (AELF) (n = 58); we focused on the outcomes of these two subgroups.
    RESULTS: PSD patients who underwent mini-invasive PPS more often succeeded with day surgery (94.5% vs 32.8%, p < 0.001), had fewer postoperative complications (9.4% vs 36.2%, p = 0.002), and had shorter sick leave (median 14 days vs 21 days, p < 0.001) than did AELF patients. Nevertheless, at the first postoperative follow-up visit, both surgery methods healed similarly (75.0% vs 76.8%, p = 0.83). Our long-term follow-up, at a median of 9.3 years (range 5.4-10.6), revealed, however, that recurrence after PPS was markedly higher than after AELF (50.9% vs 10.3%, HR 6.65, p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: PPS, which is a mini-invasive surgical technique often performed under local anaesthesia, is suitable for primary PSD, despite the high recurrence rate in our study, bearing in mind that patient selection is an important factor to consider. Primary PSD with simple sinus formations may benefit from PPS. On the other hand, primary PSD with complex sinus formations may benefit from AELF regardless of the initial slow recovery in our study. Because PSD is a very heterogenous disease, and patients have different risk factors, it is mandatory for the surgeon to master several different surgical techniques. A classification system to aid the surgeon in selecting the right surgical technique for each patient is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨女性患者的藏毛窦疾病(PSD)和多毛症的共存情况。
    UNASSIGNED:本回顾性横断面研究评估了2007年1月至2014年5月因PSD接受手术的164名女性患者的人口统计学和临床数据。这项研究收集的数据是年龄,BMI,改良的Ferriman和Gallwey量表(mFGS)用于多毛症,主要症状,手术类型,术后早期并发症(伤口感染,伤口开裂),复发,和后续行动。自变量是多毛症(mFGS评分)和BMI。因变量是术后早期并发症和复发。
    未经评估:中位年龄为20岁(中位数为95%CI:19-21岁)。根据BMI,45.7,50.6和3.7%的患者被认为是正常的,超重,肥胖,分别。根据MFGS,11,9.8,52.4和26.8%的患者被认为没有,温和,中度,或者严重的多毛症,分别。14例(8.5%)患者出现复发。6例原发性闭合患者复发,五名Limberg皮瓣患者,两名Karydakis患者,还有一个有袋形的。复发与非复发患者的BMI(P=0.054)和mFGS(P=0.921)无统计学差异。另一方面,发生术后早期并发症的患者的BMI高于未发生术后早期并发症的患者(P<0.001)。
    未经证实:PSD不再是“男性唯一的疾病”。BMI增加术后早期并发症的风险,但BMI与复发之间未发现这种关联.PSD与多毛症之间的关系需要前瞻性的多中心研究。
    This study aimed to investigate the coexistence of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) and hirsutism in female patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The demographic and clinical data of 164 female patients who underwent surgery for PSD between January 2007 and May 2014 were evaluated for this retrospective cross-sectional study. Data collected for this study were age, BMI, the modified Ferriman and Gallwey scale (mFGS) for hirsutism, main symptoms, type of surgery, early postoperative complications (wound infection, wound dehiscence), recurrence, and follow-up. The independent variables are hirsutism (mFGS scores) and BMI. Dependent variables are early postoperative complications and recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: The median age was 20 years (95% CI for median: 19-21 years). According to the BMI, 45.7, 50.6, and 3.7% of patients were considered normal, overweight, and obese, respectively. According to the mFGS, 11, 9.8, 52.4, and 26.8% of patients were considered to have none, mild, moderate, or severe hirsutism, respectively. Fourteen (8.5%) patients had developed recurrence. Recurrence developed in six patients with primary closure, five patients with Limberg flaps, two patients with Karydakis, and one with marsupialization. There was no statistical difference between recurrent and nonrecurrent patients in terms of BMI (P=0.054) and mFGS (P=0.921). On the other hand, BMI was statistically significantly higher in those who developed early postoperative complications than in those who did not (P<0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: PSD is no longer a \'men\'s only disease\'. BMI increases the risk of early postoperative complications, but this association was not found between BMI and recurrence. Prospective multicenter studies are needed on the relationship between PSD and hirsutism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鼻窦病(PNSD)挑战了外科医生数十年。Limberg皮瓣修复术(LFR)是PNSD的常用治疗方法。目的观察LFR在PNSD中的作用及危险因素。对2016年至2022年在解放军总医院2个医疗中心和4个科室就诊并接受LFR治疗的PNSD患者进行回顾性研究。风险因素,手术的效果,观察并发症。比较已知危险因素对手术结果的影响。有37名PNSD患者:男女比例为35:2,平均年龄:25.1±7.9岁。平均BMI:25.2±4.0kg/m2,平均创面愈合时间:15.4±3.4天。术后1期愈合30例(81.0%),7期愈合(16.3%)。只有1例患者(2.7%)复发,而其他患者则在换药后治愈。在年龄上没有显著差异,BMI,术前清创史,术前窦房结分类,伤口区域,负压引流管,易发时间(<3d)和治疗效果。深蹲排便和过早排便与治疗效果相关,在多变量分析中,它们是治疗效果的独立预测因子.LFR具有稳定的治疗结果。与其他皮瓣相比,这种皮瓣的治疗效果没有显着差异,但设计简单,不受手术前已知危险因素的影响。然而,有必要避免两个独立风险因素的影响,蹲便和过早排便,关于治疗效果。
    Pilonidal sinus disease (PNSD) challenged surgeons for decades. Limberg flap repair (LFR) is a common treatment for PNSD. The purpose of this study was to observe the effect and risk factors of LFR in PNSD. A retrospective study was conducted on the PNSD patients who visited two medical centers and four departments in the People\'s Liberation Army General Hospital and were taking LFR treatment between 2016 and 2022. The risk factors, the effect of the operation, and complications were observed. The effects of known risk factors on the surgical results were compared. There were 37 PNSD patients: male/female ratio of 35:2, average age: 25.1 ± 7.9 years. Average BMI: 25.2 ± 4.0 kg/m2 , average wound healing time: 15.4 ± 3.4 days. 30 patients (81.0%) healed in stage one and 7 (16.3%) had postoperative complications. Only 1 patient (2.7%) had a recurrence while others were healed after dressing-changing. There was no significant difference in age, BMI, preoperative debridement history, preoperative sinus classification, Wound area, Negative pressure drainage tube, prone time (<3d) and treatment effect. Squat defecate and premature defecation were associated with treatment effect, and they were independent predictors of treatment effect in the multivariate analysis. LFR has a stable therapeutic outcome. Compared with other skin flaps, the therapeutic effect of this flap is not significantly different, but the design is simple and is not affected by the known risk factors before operation. However, it is necessary to avoid the influence of two independent risk factors, squatting defecation and premature defecation, on the therapeutic effect.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目的:微创性,在局部麻醉下进行的可能性,并且易于重复导致激光辅助治疗毛发窦疾病的日益普及。特此,有可能避免在家中长期需要医疗护理,丧失工作能力,以及患者和社会的高额费用。这次回顾,多中心研究旨在评估激光辅助治疗藏毛窦疾病的可行性.
    方法:患者人群包括2017年1月至2021年12月在比利时三家医院接受激光辅助治疗的所有患者。数据是回顾性收集的。主要终点是一个或多个激光辅助手术后的整体伤口愈合。
    结果:共纳入226例患者,平均随访时间为129天[7-1120]。一次激光手术后的治愈率为78.8%。这些患者中的一些通过第二次或第三次手术治愈,在一次或多次激光手术后,总治愈率为85.4%。伤口感染是术后主要并发症(8.0%),其中5例需要引流(2.2%)。29例患者(12.8%),激光辅助治疗不足,导致二次操作(排水,切除,或襟翼)。
    结论:本研究表明激光辅助治疗藏毛窦疾病是可行的。与皮瓣修复等其他技术相比,该技术的微创特性可能弥补更高的非愈合率。然而,必须注意治愈率可能与鼻窦的表现有关,并且应降低预期,因为并不总是达到高治愈率。
    OBJECTIVE: The minimally invasive character, the possibility to perform under local anesthesia, and the ease to repeat have led to increasing popularity of laser-assisted treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. Hereby, potentially avoiding prolonged need for medical care at home, incapacity to work, and high expenses for patients and society. This retrospective, multi-center study is aimed at evaluating the feasibility of laser-assisted treatment for pilonidal sinus disease.
    METHODS: The patient population is comprised of all patients undergoing laser-assisted treatment of pilonidal sinus disease at three Belgian hospitals between January 2017 and December 2021. Data were retrospectively collected. The primary endpoint was overall wound healing after one or more laser assisted procedures.
    RESULTS: A total of 226 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 129 days [7-1120]. The healing rate after one laser procedure was 78.8%. Some of these patients were healed by a second or third procedure adding up to an overall healing rate of 85.4% after one or more laser procedures. Wound infections were the main postoperative complication (8.0%) of which 5 patients required drainage (2.2%). For 29 patients (12.8%), laser-assisted treatment was insufficient, leading to a secondary operation (drainage, excision, or flap).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that laser-assisted treatment is feasible for pilonidal sinus disease. The minimally invasive character of this technique might make up for a higher non-healing rate compared to other techniques like flap repair. However, care must be taken that healing rate might be related to the presentation of the sinus and expectations should be lowered as presumed high healing rates are not always achieved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骶尾部藏毛窦病(PSD)治疗有许多手术方法,范围从广泛的切除修复到病态较少的切除与原发性/皮瓣闭合。中线外襟翼,使切口线远离中线产裂,与传统的中线闭合技术相比,复发率较低。这项单盲随机对照试验旨在比较滑动摆动皮瓣技术与常规二次伤口闭合的短期/长期疗效和结果。
    方法:本研究是一项对PSD患者进行的前瞻性随机对照试验。将患者分为两组:二次闭合(对照)和滑动摆动皮瓣(试验)。建议患者在手术后两周内每周两次访问外科诊所至少六个月。
    结果:在这项研究中,纳入100例患者。他们被分成两组对照组,和审判。所有参与者的平均年龄为29.15±8.36岁(年龄范围:18-62岁)。两组平均手术时间为39.65±12.63,对照组为29.70±7.71,摆动皮瓣组为46.90±7.81。两组患者视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分显示,与接受二次闭合的患者相比,试验组的VAS评分较低(p值=0.006)。此外,试验组表现出更高的愈合率,更好的美容效果,与对照组相比,恢复时间更快。
    结论:与二次闭合相比,滑动摆动皮瓣与出色的美容效果相关,疾病复发,和恢复时间。此外,术后并发症明显低于传统方法。
    BACKGROUND: There are many surgical approaches for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) therapy, ranging from wide excision repair to less morbid excisions with primary/flap closure. The off-midline flaps, which shift the incision line away from the midline natal cleft, have been associated with lower recurrence rates than the conventional mid-line closure techniques. This single-blinded randomized controlled trial aims to compare the short/long-term efficacy and outcome of the slide-swing flap technique with the conventional secondary wound closure.
    METHODS: This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted on patients with PSD. Patients were assigned into two groups: secondary closure (control) and slide-swing flap (trial). Patients were advised to visit the surgical clinic two times weekly for the two weeks after the operation for at least six months.
    RESULTS: In this study, 100 patients were enrolled. They were assigned into two groups of control, and trial. The mean age of all participants was 29.15 ± 8.36 years old (age range: 18-62 years old). The mean operation time was 39.65 ± 12.63 for both groups, with the control group being 29.70 ± 7.71 and the swing flap group 46.90 ± 7.81. Patient visual analog scale (VAS) scores in both groups revealed that the trial group was associated with lower VAS scores compared with patients who underwent secondary closure (p-value = 0.006). Also, the trial group demonstrated a higher rate of healing, better cosmetic outcomes, and quicker recovery time compared with the controls.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with secondary closure, the slide-swing flap was associated with excellent cosmetic outcomes, disease recurrence, and recovery time. Also, the post-operative complications were significantly lower compared with the traditional method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生活质量(QOL)结果是确定手术治疗效果的理想方法。在患有藏毛窦病(PSD)的儿童中,开放手术意味着长时间的伤口护理,显著的发病率,和高复发率。内窥镜治疗(PEPSIT)克服了这些限制。我们报告了我们在PSD管理方面的经验,以评估接受开放和内镜治疗的患者的生活质量。回顾性回顾了2008年至2021年177例PSD手术患者的记录。20例患者接受了开放手术(G1),157例接受了PEPSIT(G2)。我们通过以下标准分析生活质量:住院时间(HS),愈合时间(HT),回归运动(RTSp)返回学校(RTSc),恢复社会生活(RSL),复发率和再手术(RRR)。此外,我们使用儿科生活享受质量和满意度问卷(PQ-LES-Q)对生活满意度进行更主观的评价.我们发现所有分析标准均存在显着差异:HS在G1中从3到7天不等,在G2中从1到2天不等;G1中的HT从40到75天,而G2中的HT从20到41天不等;G1中的RTSp从50到80天,而G2中的RTSc从9到15天,而从2到4天;
    结论:内镜治疗(PEPSIT)可显著改善PSD患者的生活质量。与开放手术相比,PEPSIT的住院时间较短,更快的愈合时间,回到体育活动,回到学校,恢复正常的社会生活,复发率和再手术率较低。此外,PQ-LES-Q表现出良好的整体生活质量和生活满意度。应获得进一步的前瞻性研究,以将PEPSIT视为儿科患者PSD治疗的金标准。
    背景:•在过去的20年中,已经提出了许多技术用于PSD的手术治疗。•PEPSIT在安全性和长期疗效方面显示出有希望的结果。
    背景:•PEPSIT手术患者的生活质量的主要影响是他们的日常活动,包括住院时间缩短,更快的愈合时间,回到体育活动,回到学校,恢复正常的社会生活,复发率和再手术率较低。•PEPSIT之后,根据PQ-LES-Q分析,儿童维持满意的生活质量。
    Quality of life (QOL) outcome is an ideal method for determining the efficacy of a surgical treatment. In children operated for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), open procedures imply prolonged wound care, significant morbidity, and high recurrence rates. Endoscopic treatment (PEPSIT) overcomes these limitations. We report our experience in the management of PSD to evaluate the QOL of patients undergoing open and endoscopic treatment. The records of 177 patients undergoing surgery for PSD from 2008 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty patients were operated with open surgery (G1) and 157 with PEPSIT (G2). We analyzed QOL through the following criteria: hospital stay (HS), healing time (HT), return to sport (RTSp), return to school (RTSc), resumption of social life (RSL), and recurrence rate and reoperation (RRR). Moreover, we used Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q) for a more subjective evaluation of life satisfaction. We found significant differences in all the analyzed criteria: HS varied from 3 to 7 days in G1 and from 1 to 2 days in G2; HT from 40 to 75 days in G1 while from 20 to 41 days in G2; RTSp from 50 to 80 days in G1 while from 7 to 21 days in G2; RTSc from 9 to 15 days in G1 while from 2 to 4 days in G2; RSL from 13 to 20 days in G1 while from 2 to 5 days in G2; RRR was 25% in G1 and 4.4% in G2.
    CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment (PEPSIT) significantly improves the quality of life of patients operated for PSD. Compared to open surgery, PEPSIT presents shorter hospital stay, faster healing time, return to sport activities, return to school and resumption of a normal social life, and lower rates of recurrence and reoperation. In addition, PQ-LES-Q demonstrated a good overall quality of life and life satisfaction. Further prospective studies should be obtained to consider PEPSIT as the gold standard for the treatment of PSD in pediatric patients.
    BACKGROUND: • Many techniques have been proposed in the last 20 years for the surgical treatment of PSD. • PEPSIT is showing promising results in terms of safety and long-term efficacy.
    BACKGROUND: • The main impact in QOL of patients operated with PEPSIT is on their daily activity, including a shorter hospital stay, faster healing time, return to sport activities, return to school and resumption of a normal social life, lower rates of recurrence and reoperation. • After PEPSIT, children maintain a satisfactory quality of life according to the analysis of PQ-LES-Q.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号