Metastatic disease

转移性疾病
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    宫颈癌最常见的是通过血液传播到肺部,肝脏,还有骨头.然而,它很少转移到脚。只有一例宫颈癌转移至足部。此外,转移性疾病的初始成像很难与感染性或其他炎症过程区分开来,特别是在高度怀疑感染源的临床环境中。这里,我们提出了一个罕见的宫颈癌转移到跟骨伪装成骨髓炎,强调诊断成像与组织学确认的重要性。
    Cervical cancer most commonly spreads hematogenously to the lungs, liver, and bone. However, it rarely metastasizes to the foot. There is only one other case of cervical cancer with metastasis to the foot. In addition, the initial imaging of metastatic disease has difficulty in differentiating from infectious or other inflammatory processes, particularly in a clinical setting highly suspicious of infectious sources. Here, we present a rare case of cervical cancer metastasizing to the calcaneus masquerading as osteomyelitis, highlighting the importance of diagnostic imaging in conjunction with histological confirmation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文讨论了准确区分低HER2和HER2阴性乳腺癌的重要性,作为新型ADC已在大量HER2低表达BC患者中显示出活性。虽然目前的指南建议将HER2分为阳性或阴性,HER2低概念的出现要求乳腺癌HER2检测的标准化,使用目前可用的检测方法来更好地区分HER2水平。这篇综述涵盖了与乳腺癌这一重要生物标志物相关的ASCO/CAP指南的演变和最新更新。包括仍在发展的概念,如HER2低,HER2异质性,HER2进化我们小组提出了墨西哥对乳腺癌HER2状态评估的最新建议,考虑ASCO/CAP指南并引入低HER2概念。在个性化医疗时代,准确的HER2状态评估仍然是乳腺癌最重要的生物标志物之一,墨西哥病理学家对治疗无关生物标志物质量的承诺对于提供最有效的肿瘤学护理至关重要。
    The article discusses the importance of accurately distinguishing HER2-low from HER2-negative breast cancer, as novel ADCs have demonstrated activity in a large population of patients with HER2-low-expressing BC. While current guidelines recommend a dichotomous classification of HER2 as either positive or negative, the emergence of the HER2-low concept calls for standardization of HER2 testing in breast cancer, using currently available assays to better discriminate HER2 levels. This review covers the evolution and latest updates of the ASCO/CAP guidelines relevant to this important biomarker in breast cancer, including still-evolving concepts such as HER2 low, HER2 heterogeneity, and HER2 evolution. Our group presents the latest Mexican recommendations for HER2 status evaluation in breast cancer, considering the ASCO/CAP guidelines and introducing the HER2-low concept. In the era of personalized medicine, accurate HER2 status assessment remains one of the most important biomarkers in breast cancer, and the commitment of Mexican pathologists to theragnostic biomarker quality is crucial for providing the most efficient care in oncology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在选定的转移性肾细胞癌患者中,转移瘤切除术可以延长生存期.在此,我们报告了一例在右肾完全切除术后12年并发胰腺和十二指肠转移的患者。通过保留胰腺的十二指肠切除术和远端胰腺切除术成功治疗了转移。一名66岁的男子被转诊到我们医院,主诉是右上腹痛。12年前,他接受了腹腔镜全右肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌。增强计算机断层扫描显示Vater乳头附近的胰腺体和降十二指肠中的高血管肿瘤。超声内镜引导下细针穿刺细胞学标本的组织病理学检查显示转移性透明细胞肾癌。该患者接受了保留胰腺的十二指肠切除术和远端胰腺切除术。他在手术后出现胰瘘,经保守治疗好转,并且在术后20个月内都没有复发的证据。
    In selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, metastasectomy can achieve prolonged survival. Herein we report a patient with concomitant pancreatic and duodenal metastases occurring 12 years after total right nephrectomy for a renal cell carcinoma. The metastases were successfully treated by a pancreas-sparing duodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. A 66-year-old man was referred to our hospital with a chief complaint of right upper abdominal pain. He had undergone laparoscopic total right nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma 12 years before. Enhanced computed tomography showed hypervascular tumors in the pancreatic body and the descending duodenum near the papilla of Vater. Histopathological examination of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens revealed metastatic clear cell renal cancer. The patient underwent pancreas-sparing duodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. He developed a pancreatic fistula after surgery that improved with conservative treatment, and has been free of evidence of recurrence up to 20 months postoperatively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项系统评价严格评估了系统性治疗对RAS阳性IV期结直肠癌患者的预后和生活质量(QoL)的影响。随着截至2023年12月在PubMed上发表的研究,Scopus,和WebofScience。从最初的1345篇文章中,11项相关研究入选,包括各种各样的系统治疗,包括帕尼单抗联合FOLFOX4和FOLFIRI,伊立替康与帕尼单抗配对,瑞戈非尼,然后是西妥昔单抗±伊立替康,反之亦然,和帕尼单抗作为诱导后的维持治疗。患者人口统计学主要包括中老年人,有轻微的男性优势。种族组成,据报道,显示了大多数白种人的参与者,强调在未来的研究中需要更广泛的人口包容性。主要研究结果表明,在化疗(FOLFOX4或FOLFIRI)中添加帕尼单抗并没有显着影响QoL,同时显着改善无病生存率。基线EQ-5DHSI平均得分为0.76至0.78,VAS平均得分为70.1至74.1。FACT-C评分和EQ-5D指数评分的改善尤其有利于帕尼单抗加KRAS野生型mCRC的最佳支持治疗,帕尼单抗+BSC的早期辍学率为38-42%。值得注意的是,西妥昔单抗+FOLFIRI的中位生存期为25.7个月,而单独使用FOLFIRI的中位生存期为16.4个月,强调将靶向治疗与化疗相结合的潜在益处。总之,这篇综述强调了系统治疗的重大影响,特别是靶向治疗及其与化疗的组合,RAS阳性IV期结直肠癌患者的生存结局和QoL,以及个性化治疗的需要。
    This systematic review critically evaluates the impact of systemic treatments on outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in patients with RAS-positive stage IV colorectal cancer, with studies published up to December 2023 across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. From an initial pool of 1345 articles, 11 relevant studies were selected for inclusion, encompassing a diverse range of systemic treatments, including panitumumab combined with FOLFOX4 and FOLFIRI, irinotecan paired with panitumumab, regorafenib followed by cetuximab ± irinotecan and vice versa, and panitumumab as a maintenance therapy post-induction. Patient demographics predominantly included middle-aged to elderly individuals, with a slight male predominance. Racial composition, where reported, showed a majority of Caucasian participants, highlighting the need for broader demographic inclusivity in future research. Key findings revealed that the addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy (FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI) did not significantly compromise QoL while notably improving disease-free survival, with baseline EQ-5D HSI mean scores ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 and VAS mean scores from 70.1 to 74.1. Improvements in FACT-C scores and EQ-5D Index scores particularly favored panitumumab plus best supportive care in KRAS wild-type mCRC, with early dropout rates of 38-42% for panitumumab + BSC. Notably, cetuximab + FOLFIRI was associated with a median survival of 25.7 months versus 16.4 months for FOLFIRI alone, emphasizing the potential benefits of integrating targeted therapies with chemotherapy. In conclusion, the review underscores the significant impact of systemic treatments, particularly targeted therapies and their combinations with chemotherapy, on survival outcomes and QoL in patients with RAS-positive stage IV colorectal cancer, and the need for personalized treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:转移性疾病是肺癌的主要且难以治疗的并发症。考虑到现有疗法的有效性不足,并考虑到目前肺癌化疗耐药的问题,有必要继续开发新的治疗方法。
    方法:以前,我们已经证明了来自脾脏的重编程CD8+T细胞(rCD8+T细胞)在原位肺癌小鼠中的抗肿瘤作用。通过MEKi和免疫检查点PD-1/PD-L1抑制MAPK/ERK信号通路进行重编程。同时,在Lewis肺癌(LLC)细胞中训练CD8+T细胞。我们建议从脾脏分离的rCD8T细胞可能会阻碍转移性疾病的发展。
    结果:本研究表明,重编程程序增强了LLC培养物中脾CD8T细胞的存活和细胞毒性。在自发转移的LLC模型中,脾rCD8+T细胞治疗增加了小鼠肺部CD8+T细胞和CD4+T细胞的数量。这些变化可以解释肺部肿瘤的部分减少和转移活性的缓解。
    结论:我们提出的重编程方法增强了从脾脏分离的CD8+T细胞的抗肿瘤活性,在制定治疗肺癌患者转移性疾病的方法中可能是有价值的。
    BACKGROUND: Metastatic disease is a major and difficult-to-treat complication of lung cancer. Considering insufficient effectiveness of existing therapies and taking into account the current problem of lung cancer chemoresistance, it is necessary to continue the development of new treatments.
    METHODS: Previously, we have demonstrated the antitumor effects of reprogrammed CD8+ T-cells (rCD8+ T-cells) from the spleen in mice with orthotopic lung carcinoma. Reprogramming was conducted by inhibiting the MAPK/ERK signalling pathway through MEKi and the immune checkpoint PD-1/PD-L1. Concurrently, CD8+ T-cells were trained in Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells. We suggested that rCD8+ T-cells isolated from the spleen might impede the development of metastatic disease.
    RESULTS: The present study has indicated that the reprogramming procedure enhances the survival and cytotoxicity of splenic CD8+ T-cells in LLC culture. In an LLC model of spontaneous metastasis, splenic rCD8 + T-cell therapy augmented the numbers of CD8+ T-cells and CD4+ T-cells in the lungs of mice. These changes can account for the partial reduction of tumors in the lungs and the mitigation of metastatic activity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed reprogramming method enhances the antitumor activity of CD8+ T-cells isolated from the spleen and could be valuable in formulating an approach to treating metastatic disease in patients with lung cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    具有非特殊类型的混合浸润性乳腺癌(IBC-NST)和浸润性小叶癌(ILC)组织学的原发性肿瘤在所有乳腺癌患者中约有5%存在,并且在转移水平上研究不足。这里,我们对死后组织捐献计划UPTIDER(NCT04531696)的两名原发性混合IBC-NST/ILC患者的转移瘤组织学进行了表征.尸检时收集的14和43个转移性病变的形态学特征和E-cadherin染色模式与纯ILC一致。虽然我们的发现还需要进一步验证,它们可能会挑战这些患者当前的临床实践和影像学检查方法.
    Primary tumors with a mixed invasive breast carcinoma of no-special type (IBC-NST) and invasive lobular cancer (ILC) histology are present in approximately five percent of all patients with breast cancer and are understudied at the metastatic level. Here, we characterized the histology of metastases from two patients with primary mixed IBC-NST/ILC from the postmortem tissue donation program UPTIDER (NCT04531696). The 14 and 43 metastatic lesions collected at autopsy had morphological features and E-cadherin staining patterns consistent with pure ILC. While our findings still require further validation, they may challenge current clinical practice and imaging modalities used in these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肾细胞癌是一种侵袭性疾病,死亡率高。随着免疫疗法的新时代,管理发生了巨大变化,新的策略正在开发中;然而,确定系统治疗仍然具有挑战性。本文介绍了拉丁美洲合作肿瘤学小组和拉丁美洲肾癌小组关于巴西晚期肾细胞癌管理的专家小组共识的更新。
    方法:由34名肿瘤学家和肾癌专家组成的小组讨论并投票确定了处理巴西晚期疾病的最佳选择。包括早期和转移性肾细胞癌以及非透明细胞肿瘤的全身治疗。将结果与文献进行比较,并根据证据水平进行分级。
    结果:辅助治疗有利于手术后复发风险高的患者,使用的药物是派博利珠单抗和舒尼替尼,与pembrolizumab的偏好。新辅助治疗是特殊的,即使在最初无法切除的病例中。一线治疗主要基于酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs);治疗的选择基于国际转移数据库联盟(IMCD)风险评分。处于有利风险的患者接受ICIs与TKIs的组合。分类为中度或低度风险的患者接受ICIs,不偏好ICI+ICIs或ICI+TKIs。关于非透明细胞肾癌治疗的数据有限。主动监测在治疗有利风险患者方面有一席之地。地诺单抗或唑来膦酸均可用于治疗转移性骨病。
    结论:免疫治疗和靶向治疗是治疗晚期疾病的标准。这些治疗剂的利用和排序取决于个体风险评分和对先前治疗的反应。这一共识反映了对知情决策的承诺,来自医学文献中的专业知识和证据。
    OBJECTIVE: Renal cell carcinoma is an aggressive disease with a high mortality rate. Management has drastically changed with the new era of immunotherapy, and novel strategies are being developed; however, identifying systemic treatments is still challenging. This paper presents an update of the expert panel consensus from the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group on advanced renal cell carcinoma management in Brazil.
    METHODS: A panel of 34 oncologists and experts in renal cell carcinoma discussed and voted on the best options for managing advanced disease in Brazil, including systemic treatment of early and metastatic renal cell carcinoma as well as nonclear cell tumours. The results were compared with the literature and graded according to the level of evidence.
    RESULTS: Adjuvant treatments benefit patients with a high risk of recurrence after surgery, and the agents used are pembrolizumab and sunitinib, with a preference for pembrolizumab. Neoadjuvant treatment is exceptional, even in initially unresectable cases. First-line treatment is mainly based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the choice of treatment is based on the International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMCD) risk score. Patients at favourable risk receive ICIs in combination with TKIs. Patients classified as intermediate or poor risk receive ICIs, without preference for ICI + ICIs or ICI + TKIs. Data on nonclear cell renal cancer treatment are limited. Active surveillance has a place in treating favourable-risk patients. Either denosumab or zoledronic acid can be used for treating metastatic bone disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are the standards of care for advanced disease. The utilization and sequencing of these therapeutic agents hinge upon individual risk scores and responses to previous treatments. This consensus reflects a commitment to informed decision-making, drawn from professional expertise and evidence in the medical literature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    骨骼是参与转移癌扩散的第三大常见器官系统。系统治疗的更多选择,手术和辅助治疗为已知骨转移癌的患者提供了更长的生存期。这意味着比以往任何时候都更多的患者患有转移性骨骼疾病。如果转移性疾病导致足够的骨丢失,则可能导致患者明显的疼痛和功能障碍。髋臼和骨盆是转移性疾病的常见部位。骨性骨盆和髋臼的复杂解剖结构,以及它靠近重要的神经血管和骨盆结构,可以使髋臼转移性疾病的手术治疗技术难度。有症状的骨转移病患者的决策是复杂的,多学科团队可以帮助为这些患者提供适当的护理。全身化疗,免疫疗法或靶向疗法可能无法充分治疗髋关节和骨盆的大面积转移性疾病.放射治疗并非对所有患者都成功。幸运的是,不断发展的疗法为患者和提供者提供了更多的治疗选择。这篇综述文章将涵盖一些新疗法及其结果,专注于新的烧蚀,涉及髋臼的转移性疾病的微创和外科重建技术。在患者的转移性髋臼疾病的管理中,决策仍然是根据具体情况做出的。这篇综述文章希望能提醒临床医生这些患者可用的各种治疗方法。
    The skeleton is the third most common organ system to be involved in the spread of metastatic carcinomas. More options for systemic therapies, surgeries and adjuvant treatments are providing longer survival for patients with known metastatic carcinoma to the bone. This means more patients are living with metastatic skeletal disease than ever before. If metastatic disease results in enough bone loss it can cause significant pain and dysfunction for patients. The acetabulum and pelvis are common sites of metastatic disease. The complex anatomy of the bony pelvis and acetabulum, as well as its proximity to important neurovascular and pelvic structures, can make surgical management of acetabular metastatic disease technically difficult. Decision making for patients with symptomatic skeletal metastatic disease is complex, and multidisciplinary teams can be helpful in providing appropriate care for these patients. Systemic chemotherapies, immunotherapies or targeted therapies may not adequately treat large areas of metastatic disease in the hip and pelvis. Radiation therapy is not successful for all patients. Fortunately, there are evolving therapies that are giving patients and providers more options for treatment. This review article will cover some of those new therapies and their outcomes, focusing on newer ablative, minimally invasive and surgical reconstruction techniques for metastatic disease involving the acetabulum. Decision making in the management of a patient\'s metastatic acetabular disease is still made on a case by case basis. This review article hopefully will remind clinicians of the variety of treatments available to these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肱骨转移性病变的治疗取决于患者的疼痛,病变大小和位置,和术后功能目标。手术选择包括钢板或钉固定[切开复位内固定(ORIF)],或假体置换(EPR),水泥增强。本研究的目的是通过重建方法对结果进行单机构回顾性分析,肿瘤体积,和病理诊断。
    在机构审查委员会(IRB)批准后,回顾性审查了2005-2018年在我们的肌肉骨骼肿瘤中心接受手术治疗的229例连续患者的记录。肱骨手术治疗的适应症包括即将发生和移位的病理性骨折的患者。
    60名患者(34名男性,26名女性),平均年龄为62.9±12.2岁,在近端接受手术治疗(n=21),骨干(n=29),或肱骨远端(n=10)。49例(82%)患者出现移位的病理性骨折。其余11名患者的平均Mirels评分为9.5。EPR或ORIF之间的总并发症发生率无差异[4/36(11%)与2/24(8%);P=0.725]。EPR和ORIF的平均肌肉骨骼肿瘤协会(MSTS)评分为83%,在近端亚组分析中没有差异,骨干,或者肱骨远端.前路(AP)和外侧成像皮质破坏的患者发生机械故障的风险增加[2/6(33%)与0/18(0%),P=0.015]。
    总而言之,当病理模式允许时,骨水泥增强固定可以稳定病理性骨,同时将软组织脱离的风险降至最低,而EPR在骨破坏更广泛的患者中导致相似的结局。肿瘤体积增加与较低的MSTS评分相关。
    UNASSIGNED: Treatment of metastatic lesions to the humerus is dependent on patient\'s pain, lesion size and location, and post-operative functional goals. Surgical options include plate or nail fixation [open reduction internal fixation (ORIF)], or endoprosthetic replacement (EPR), with cement augmentation. The objective of this study was to perform a single institution retrospective analysis of outcomes by method of reconstruction, tumor volume, and pathologic diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: The records of 229 consecutive patients treated surgically for appendicular metastatic disease from 2005-2018 at our musculoskeletal oncology center were retrospectively reviewed following institutional review board (IRB) approval. Indications for surgical treatment at the humerus included patients who presented with impending and displaced pathologic fractures.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty patients (34 male, 26 female) with a mean age of 62.9±12.2 were identified who were treated surgically at the proximal (n=21), diaphyseal (n=29), or distal (n=10) humerus. Forty-nine (82%) patients presented with displaced pathologic fractures. The remaining eleven patients had a mean Mirels score of 9.5. There was no difference in overall complication rate between EPR or ORIF [4/36 (11%) versus 2/24 (8%); P=0.725]. Mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores were 83% for both EPR and ORIF, with no differences in subgroup analyses at the proximal, diaphyseal, or distal humerus. Patients with cortical destruction on anterior posterior (AP) and lateral imaging were at increased risk for mechanical failure [2/6 (33%) versus 0/18 (0%), P=0.015].
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, when pathologic pattern permits, cement-augmented fixation allows for stabilization of pathologic bone, while minimizing risk of soft-tissue detachment, while EPR resulted in similar outcomes in patients with more extensive bone destruction. Increased tumor volume was associated with lower MSTS scores.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于立体定向身体放射疗法(SBRT)治疗超过5个脑外转移瘤的可行性的数据有限,几乎没有治疗十多个的数据。这项研究的目的是研究SBRT在这种多静态环境中的可行性。
    从单中心前瞻性登记中选择了连续转移性黑色素瘤患者,这些患者具有10个以上的颅外转移和最大病变直径小于11cm,用于这项计算机规划研究。对于每个病人来说,SBRT计划以5x7Gy的处方剂量治疗所有转移瘤。和剂量限制器官(OARs)进行分析。使用基于细胞杀伤的逆向计划方法来自动确定每个病变的最大可输送剂量。同时尊重所有OAR约束。
    总共23例多转移患者,其中17例转移(范围,选择每位患者11-51)。23名患者中有16名实现了具有足够目标覆盖率和受尊重的OAR剂量限制的SBRT计划。其余7名患者,肺V5Gy<80%和肝D700cm3<15Gy是最常见的剂量限制约束。基于细胞杀伤的计划方法允许根据转移的总体积和位置优化剂量施用。
    这项回顾性计划研究显示了明确的SBRT对70%的多转移性患者有10个以上的颅外病变的可行性,并提出了细胞杀伤计划方法作为一种个性化的方法多转移性患者的治疗计划。
    UNASSIGNED: Limited data is available about the feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for treating more than five extra-cranial metastases, and almost no data for treating more than ten. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of SBRT in this polymetatstatic setting.
    UNASSIGNED: Consecutive metastatic melanoma patients with more than ten extra-cranial metastases and a maximum lesion diameter below 11 cm were selected from a single-center prospective registry for this in-silico planning study. For each patient, SBRT plans were generated to treat all metastases with a prescribed dose of 5x7Gy, and dose-limiting organs (OARs) were analyzed. A cell-kill based inverse planning approach was used to automatically determine the maximum deliverable dose to each lesion individually, while respecting all OARs constraints.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 23 polymetastatic patients with a medium of 17 metastases (range, 11-51) per patient were selected. SBRT plans with sufficient target coverage and respected OARs dose constraints were achieved in 16 out of 23 patients. In the remaining seven patients, the lungs V5Gy < 80 % and the liver D700 cm3 < 15Gy were most frequently the dose-limiting constraints. The cell-kill based planning approach allowed optimizing the dose administration depending on metastases total volume and location.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective planning study shows the feasibility of definitive SBRT for 70% of polymetastatic patients with more than ten extra-cranial lesions and proposes the cell-killing planning approach as an approach to individualize treatment planning in polymetastatic patients\'.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号