Laxative

泻药
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:便秘形式的胃动力受损常发生在老年慢性心力衰竭患者中。经导管主动脉置换术(TAVR)的候选人年龄较大,有多种合并症,可能包括便秘.然而,接受TAVR的患者有便秘史的临床意义尚不清楚.方法:2015年至2022年在我们的大型学术中心接受TAVR的患者符合资格。规定的泻药类型和数量的预后影响,这被认为是便秘的严重程度,对出院后两年死亡或心力衰竭再入院的发生率进行了调查。结果:共纳入344例患者。年龄中位数是85岁,99名患者是男性。有任何泻药的患者(N=166)收缩压较高,较高的血浆B型利钠肽水平,TAVR后指标出院时肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂的处方率较低(均p<0.05)。泻药类型的数量与复合主要结局独立相关,调整后的风险比为1.83(95%置信区间1.27-2.63,p=0.001),使用一种类型的泻药。对主要结局的2年累积发生率进行了显着分层(18%对7%,p=0.001)。结论:便秘的存在与TAVR后较差的临床预后相关。积极干预便秘的预后影响仍然是该队列未来关注的问题。
    Background: Impaired gastric motility in the form of constipation may often occur in elderly patients with chronic heart failure. Candidates for trans-catheter aortic replacement (TAVR) are of old age and have multiple comorbidities, probably including constipation. However, the clinical implication of a history of constipation in patients receiving TAVR remains unknown. Methods: Patients who underwent TAVR at our large academic center between 2015 and 2022 were eligible. The prognostic impact of the prescribed laxative type and number, which was assumed as the severity of constipation, on the incidence of death or heart failure readmission two years after index discharge was investigated. Results: A total of 344 patients were included. Median age was 85 years, and 99 patients were men. Patients with any laxatives (N = 166) had higher systolic blood pressure, higher plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and a lower prescription rate of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors at the time of index discharge after TAVR (p < 0.05 for all). The number of laxative types was independently associated with the composite primary outcome with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.83 (95% confidence interval 1.27-2.63, p = 0.001) with a cutoff of one type of laxative used, which significantly stratified the 2-year cumulative incidence of the primary outcome (18% versus 7%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The presence of constipation was associated with worse clinical outcomes following TAVR. The prognostic impact of an aggressive intervention for constipation remains a future concern in this cohort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:便秘在全球范围内引起大量发病率。方法:这项调查使用日本版本的肠易激综合征生活质量(IBS-QOL-J)工具评估了日本的便秘相关因素。我们还检查了泻药类型之间的关系,布里斯托尔凳子表格量表(BSFS)得分,和治疗费用。最后,我们根据泻药类型检查了满意度得分的差异,治疗类型,治疗费用,和BSFS得分。结果:服用盐和/或刺激性泻药的人中IBS-QOL-J较高。那些支付>5000日元(50.00美元)的IBS-QOL-J最低。在BSFS评分为1或2(严重便秘)的人群中,IBS-QOL-J明显较低。结论:这项研究的结果表明,各种因素,包括治疗类型和费用,与排便满意度有关。那些有硬凳子的人,使用多种泻药,或花更多的治疗不太满意。未来的策略应针对不需要多种泻药且治疗成本较低的疗法。以最低的成本使用少量适当的泻药进行适当的排便似乎可以提高排便满意度。需要确定适当的泻药并改善饮食习惯和锻炼程序。还必须停止盲目增加泻药的使用,并正确诊断便秘障碍,例如功能性便秘以外的解剖学异常。
    Background: Constipation causes substantial morbidity worldwide. Methods: This survey assessed constipation-related factors in Japan using the Japanese version of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL-J) instrument. We also examined the relationship among laxative type, Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) scores, and treatment cost. Finally, we examined differences in satisfaction scores according to laxative type, treatment type, treatment cost, and BSFS score. Results: IBS-QOL-J was higher among those taking salt and/or irritation laxatives. Those paying >JPY 5000 (USD 50.00) had the lowest IBS-QOL-J. IBS-QOL-J was significantly lower among those with a BSFS score of 1 or 2 (severe constipation). Conclusions: This study\'s findings suggest that a variety of factors, including treatment type and cost, are associated with defecation satisfaction. Those who had hard stools, used multiple laxatives, or spent more on treatment were less satisfied. Future strategies should target therapies that do not require multiple laxatives with lower treatment costs. Adequate defecation with a small number of appropriate laxatives at minimal cost appears to improve defecation satisfaction. It is desirable to identify appropriate laxatives and improve dietary habits and exercise routines. It is also necessary to stop blindly increasing laxative usage and properly diagnose constipation disorders such as anatomical abnormalities other than functional constipation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人们经常抱怨长期便秘。使用现代药物治疗便秘的成本是巨大的,并且遇到副作用的可能性非常高。这些限制限制了它们在治疗中的有效性,仍未解决,并强调需要研究替代治疗方法。蒿属植物已用于治疗便秘。因此,这项研究的目的是评估水的A.abysicia叶和茎提取物对小鼠的泻药作用。
    使用三种模型评估了深参叶和茎提取物的泻药活性:泻药活性,胃肠蠕动,和胃肠分泌。在这项研究中,比沙可啶被用作标准泻药,洛哌丁胺被用于诱发便秘。
    在泻药试验中,200(P<0.05)和400mg/kg(p<0.01)剂量的植物提取物显着增加了粪便含水量的百分比。此外,最高剂量的提取物增加了12h后排便的频率(p<0.05)。在剩下的两个模型中,实验计划还显示出明显更高的胃肠蠕动和明显的肠液积累。
    这项研究的结果表明,A.abysinica的水性叶和茎提取物具有通便作用。
    UNASSIGNED: People frequently complain of long-term constipation. The cost associated with using modern medications to treat constipation is significant, and the probability of encountering side effects is notably high. These limitations restrict their effectiveness in therapy, remain unresolved, and underscore the need for research on alternative therapeutic approaches. Plants of the genus Artemisia have been used to treat constipation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the laxative effects of aqueous A. abyssinica leaf and stem extracts of Artemisia abyssinica in mice.
    UNASSIGNED: The laxative activity of A. abyssinica leaf and stem extracts was evaluated using three models: laxative activity, gastrointestinal motility, and gastrointestinal secretion. In this study, bisacodyl was used as a standard laxative and loperamide was used to induce constipation.
    UNASSIGNED: In the laxative test, 200 (P<0.05) and 400 mg/kg (p<0.01) doses of plant extract significantly increased the percentage of fecal water content. Moreover, the highest dose of extract increased the frequency of defecation after 12 h (p<0.05). In the remaining two models, the experimental plans also showed significantly higher gastrointestinal motility and noticeable accumulation of intestinal fluid.
    UNASSIGNED: The results of this study indicate that aqueous leaf and stem extracts of A. abyssinica have laxative effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    除了众所周知的阿片类药物的不良反应外,比如便秘,越来越多的证据也支持潜在的免疫抑制作用。
    在这项研究中,我们对阿片类药物抑制免疫系统的临床前和临床证据以及治疗的可能考虑因素进行了叙述性综述.
    体外和动物研究表明,阿片类药物对炎性细胞因子表达有明确的影响,免疫细胞活性,和病原体易感性。迄今为止,人类的观察数据支持临床前发现,在各种阿片类药物使用情况下,有多个感染率上升的报告。然而,与阿片类药物使用相关的其他风险因素相比,阿片类药物对免疫系统的影响导致这种风险的程度仍不确定.考虑到显示免疫抑制和阿片类药物感染风险增加的数据,需要持续接受阿片类药物治疗的患者需要采取措施来降低这种风险.在临床前研究中,阿片受体拮抗剂的给药阻断了阿片类药物的免疫调节作用。
    作为外周阿片受体的选择性拮抗剂,外周作用的μ阿片受体(MOR)拮抗剂可能能够防止免疫损伤,同时仍允许阿片类药物镇痛。未来的研究有必要进一步研究阿片类药物与感染风险之间的关系,以及外周作用MOR拮抗剂在抵消这些风险方面的潜在应用。
    UNASSIGNED: In addition to the more well-known adverse effects of opioids, such as constipation, mounting evidence supports underlying immunosuppressive effects as well.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we provide a narrative review of preclinical and clinical evidence of opioid suppression of the immune system as well as possible considerations for therapies.
    UNASSIGNED: In vitro and animal studies have shown clear effects of opioids on inflammatory cytokine expression, immune cell activity, and pathogen susceptibility. Observational data in humans have so far supported preclinical findings, with multiple reports of increased rates of infections in various settings of opioid use. However, the extent to which this risk is due to the impact of opioids on the immune system compared with other risk factors associated with opioid use remains uncertain. Considering the data showing immunosuppression and increased risk of infection with opioid use, measures are needed to mitigate this risk in patients who require ongoing treatment with opioids. In preclinical studies, administration of opioid receptor antagonists blocked the immunomodulatory effects of opioids.
    UNASSIGNED: As selective antagonists of peripheral opioid receptors, peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor (MOR) antagonists may be able to protect against immune impairment while still allowing for opioid analgesia. Future research is warranted to further investigate the relationship between opioids and infection risk as well as the potential application of peripherally acting MOR antagonists to counteract these risks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于药物引起的便秘(DIC)的详细临床信息有限。本研究旨在调查DIC的实际情况。
    这项回顾性研究使用了2014年至2021年注册的日本索赔数据库的数据。便秘队列包括至少有一个治疗便秘记录的受试者,而非便秘队列是通过随机分层抽样方法选择的,按性别匹配便秘队列。使用倾向评分将具有至少一个已知致病药物(CD)病史的研究人群和对照进行1:1匹配。潜在DIC(PDIC)的比例,PDIC的诊断时机,计算了CD和泻药按药物类别划分的处方比例,同时进行logistic回归分析以探讨其他相关因素.
    在4533905个科目中,178852在研究人群和对照中均合格。pDIC组包括19485名患者,占所有治疗便秘受试者的10.9%,而非便秘型CD组有10430名受试者。记录的CD处方和治疗的便秘之间的中位持续时间为38.0天。最常用的CD是心血管药物(47.9%)。所有CD类,作为男性,一些合并症与pDIC的发生有关。
    pDIC受试者占所有治疗便秘病例的约11%。由于与其他便秘类型相比,DIC需要不同的治疗方案,医生应该认识到为患者提供优化的治疗方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Detailed clinical information regarding drug-induced constipation (DIC) is limited. This study aimed to investigate the real-world situation of DIC.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study used data from a Japanese claims database registered from 2014 to 2021. The constipation cohort included subjects with at least one record of treated constipation, while the non-constipation cohort was selected through random stratified sampling method, to match the constipation cohort by gender. The study population and control with at least one history of a known causative drug (CD) were matched 1:1 using propensity scores. The proportion of potential DIC (pDIC), the timing of diagnosis for pDIC, and the proportion of prescriptions by drug class for both the CDs and the laxatives were calculated, while logistic regression analysis was performed to explore additional associated factors.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 4 533 905 subjects, 178 852 were eligible in both the study population and the control. The pDIC group comprised of 19 485 patients, which accounted for 10.9% of all treated constipation subjects, while the non-constipation with CD group had 10 430 subjects. The median duration between the recorded CD prescription and treated constipation was 38.0 days. The most frequently prescribed CD was cardiovascular drugs (47.9%). All CD classes, being male, and some comorbidities were associated with the occurrence of pDIC.
    UNASSIGNED: The pDIC subjects accounted for about 11% of all treated constipation cases. Since DIC requires different treatment regimens compared to other constipation types, physicians should be cognizant to provide patients with optimized treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    库拉索芦荟磨坊。在中医史中有着悠久的药用历史,在那里它赢得了相当大的声誉。其多方面的治疗特性,其特点是抗炎和抗菌属性,除了其作为泻药的既定功效外,已被广泛记录。这篇综述从术语的探索开始,基本特征,库拉索芦荟的主要成分。负责其泻药作用。随后,我们深入研究了库拉索芦荟的分子机制。\的泻药特性,便秘治疗的类型,市售制剂,关于毒性的考虑,及其临床应用。这篇综述旨在作为医疗保健专业人员和研究人员的全面参考点,增进对库拉索芦荟最佳利用的了解。在便秘的治疗中。
    Aloe barbadensis Mill. has a long history of medicinal use in the annals of traditional Chinese medicine, wherein it has garnered considerable renown. Its multifaceted therapeutic properties, characterized by its anti-inflammatory and antibacterial attributes, alongside its established efficacy as a laxative agent, have been extensively documented. This review commences with an exploration of the nomenclature, fundamental characteristics, and principal constituents of Aloe barbadensis Mill. responsible for its laxative effects. Subsequently, we delve into an extensive examination of the molecular mechanisms underlying Aloe barbadensis Mill.\'s laxative properties, types of constipation treatments, commercially available preparations, considerations pertaining to toxicity, and its clinical applications. This review aims to serve as a comprehensive reference point for healthcare professionals and researchers, fostering an enhanced understanding of the optimal utilization of Aloe barbadensis Mill. in the treatment of constipation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该意见涉及赤藓糖醇(E968)作为食品添加剂的重新评估,以及根据法规(EU)No1169/2011对其免除泻药警告标签要求的申请。赤藓糖醇是一种多元醇,它是通过用传粉念珠菌BC或巨大念珠菌KW3-6发酵,然后纯化和干燥而获得的。赤藓糖醇在人体中容易且剂量依赖性地吸收,并且可以在很小的程度上代谢为红呢。然后赤藓糖醇在尿液中排泄不变。它不会引起对遗传毒性的担忧。评估的数据集由人类介入研究组成。小组认为赤藓糖醇有可能导致人类腹泻,这被认为是不利的,因为它可能与电解质和水的不平衡有关。对于0.5g/kg体重(bw)的腹泻,未观察到的不良反应水平(NOAEL)范围的下限被确定为参考点。小组认为在参考点水平上设定可接受的每日摄入量(ADI)是适当的。专家小组认为每天0.5g/kgbw的ADI可保护即时泻药效应和潜在的慢性效应。继发于腹泻。儿童(742mg/kgbw/天)和青少年(1532mg/kgbw/天)的平均和第95百分位数慢性暴露最高。第99百分位儿童的急性暴露量最大为每餐3531mg/kgbw。总的来说,专家组认为这两种饮食暴露评估都是高估.小组的结论是,赤藓糖醇的急性和慢性膳食暴露(E968)的暴露估计值均高于ADI,这表明高摄入量的个体在单次和重复暴露后可能有经历不良反应的风险。关于新的申请,小组的结论是,现有数据不支持豁免建议。
    This opinion addresses the re-evaluation of erythritol (E 968) as food additive and an application for its exemption from the laxative warning label requirement as established under Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011. Erythritol is a polyol obtained by fermentation with Moniliella pollinis BC or Moniliella megachiliensis KW3-6, followed by purifications and drying. Erythritol is readily and dose-dependently absorbed in humans and can be metabolised to erythronate to a small extent. Erythritol is then excreted unchanged in the urine. It does not raise concerns regarding genotoxicity. The dataset evaluated consisted of human interventional studies. The Panel considered that erythritol has the potential to cause diarrhoea in humans, which was considered adverse because its potential association with electrolyte and water imbalance. The lower bound of the range of no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) for diarrhoea of 0.5 g/kg body weight (bw) was identified as reference point. The Panel considered appropriate to set a numerical acceptable daily intake (ADI) at the level of the reference point. An ADI of 0.5 g/kg bw per day was considered by the Panel to be protective for the immediate laxative effect as well as potential chronic effects, secondary to diarrhoea. The highest mean and 95th percentile chronic exposure was in children (742 mg/kg bw per day) and adolescents (1532 mg/kg bw per day). Acute exposure was maximally 3531 mg/kg bw per meal for children at the 99th percentile. Overall, the Panel considered both dietary exposure assessments an overestimation. The Panel concluded that the exposure estimates for both acute and chronic dietary exposure to erythritol (E 968) were above the ADI, indicating that individuals with high intake may be at risk of experiencing adverse effects after single and repeated exposure. Concerning the new application, the Panel concluded that the available data do not support the proposal for exemption.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    背景:肠道准备的可接受性和耐受性对于克服患者在接受结肠癌筛查和结肠镜检查时的犹豫至关重要。为了改善患者体验,开发了一种含有聚乙二醇(PEG)和硫酸盐(FPSS)的新型运动饮料风味肠道制剂,以提供与通常使用但未获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的PEG和运动饮料肠道制剂(PEG-SD)相似的体验。同时也达到改善清洁功效。
    方法:此FPSS准备,2023年6月获得FDA批准,在一项非随机2期研究中进行了评估,其中40例需要结肠镜检查的患者使用FPSS准备,20例使用PEG-SD准备.
    结果:基于非盲局部内窥镜评估(93%)和盲中心读数(97%),FPSS的总体清洁成功率很高,超过PEG-SD,成功率为84%(本地阅读),74%和68%(盲化中央读段)。如局部内窥镜医师所评估的,对于结肠段的出色准备和清洁成功,也看到了有利于FPSS的类似差异。两种制剂的耐受性都很好,93%的FPSS患者将他们的制剂评为可耐受非常容易食用,与100%的PEG-SD相比。先前进行结肠镜检查准备的患者发现FPSS和PEG-SD优于先前的准备(73%和70%,分别),几乎所有人都会在将来再次要求他们分配的研究准备。大约三分之二的FPSS患者同意该制剂的味道类似于运动饮料。
    结论:新型运动饮料风味制剂与PEG-SD相比,在肠道清洁功效方面具有优势,同时达到相似的患者满意度。该研究已在www上注册。
    结果:gov(NCT03328507)于2017年01月11日。
    BACKGROUND: Acceptability and tolerance of bowel preparation is critical to overcome patient hesitancy in undergoing colon cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy. To improve patient experience, a new sports drink-flavored bowel preparation containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sulfate salts (FPSS) was developed to provide a similar experience to a commonly used but not United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved PEG and sports drink bowel preparation (PEG-SD), while also achieving improved cleansing efficacy.
    METHODS: This FPSS preparation, approved by the FDA in June 2023, was evaluated in a non-randomized Phase 2 study in which 40 patients requiring colonoscopy were prepared with FPSS and 20 with PEG-SD.
    RESULTS: Overall cleansing success was high with FPSS based on unblinded local endoscopist assessment (93%) and blinded central reading (97%), exceeding PEG-SD which achieved success rates of 84% (local read), 74% and 68% (blinded central reads). Similar differences favoring FPSS were seen for excellent preparations and cleansing success by colon segment as rated by local endoscopists. Both preparations were well-tolerated, with 93% of FPSS patients rating their preparation as Tolerable to Very Easy to consume, compared to 100% of PEG-SD. Patients who had previously taken a preparation for colonoscopy found FPSS and PEG-SD better than their prior preparation (73% and 70%, respectively) and nearly all would request their assigned study preparation again in the future. About two thirds of FPSS patients agreed that the preparation tasted similar to a sports drink.
    CONCLUSIONS: The new sports drink-like flavored preparation compares favorably to PEG-SD for bowel cleansing efficacy while achieving similar patient satisfaction. The study was registered at www.
    RESULTS: gov (NCT03328507) on 01/11/2017.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    便秘在医院环境中经常遇到,可能会产生潜在的严重后果,但往往被低估和治疗不足。阿片类药物引起的便秘是住院患者便秘的常见原因。阿片类药物通过对肠µ阿片受体的激动作用诱导便秘。这篇综述旨在为住院患者便秘的识别和管理提供见解。特别关注阿片类药物引起的便秘。便秘评估应在入院时常规启动,并可通过全面的症状评估来促进;相关患者病史,包括最近的药物使用;体格检查;以及为评估便秘的影响而开发的患者评估工具。阿片类药物引起的便秘的管理应从确保足够的水合作用和电解质平衡并鼓励患者动员开始。其他治疗方法可能包括泻药,灌肠剂,肠道促分泌素,外周作用µ-阿片受体拮抗剂,和手动disimpaction。在严重的情况下,一些患者可能需要手术干预作为抢救治疗,难治性病例。
    Constipation is frequently encountered in hospital settings and can have potentially serious consequences yet is often underrecognized and undertreated. Opioid-induced constipation is a common cause of constipation in hospitalized patients. Opioids induce constipation through agonistic effects on enteric µ-opioid receptors. This review aims to provide insight on the identification and management of constipation in inpatient settings, with a particular focus on opioid-induced constipation. Constipation assessment should be routinely initiated at hospital admission and can be facilitated by thorough symptom assessments; relevant patient history, including recent medication use; physical examination; and patient assessment tools developed to evaluate the impact of constipation. Management of opioid-induced constipation should begin with ensuring adequate hydration and electrolyte balance and encouraging patient mobilization. Other treatments may include laxatives, enemas, intestinal secretagogues, peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists, and manual disimpaction. Surgical intervention may be required for some patients as a salvage therapy in severe, refractory cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:便秘是抗精神病药的常见不良反应,但是很少进行调查。我们的目的是在20年的时间内解决与精神分裂症患者开始使用泻药相关的因素。
    方法:我们招募了2021年4月1日在每家医院就诊的精神分裂症患者(n=14),并回顾性检查了截至2016年4月1日、2011年、2006年和2001年的所有处方,从2021年开始每5年一次。716名具有完整数据的参与者被纳入分析。使用CochranQ检验以及Bonferroni校正和Cochran-Armitage趋势检验来确定每种泻药频率的差异和趋势。进行了多因素logistic回归分析,以评估20年内开始使用泻药的因素。
    结果:在患者中,2001年有25.1%的人接受了泻药治疗,2021年有34.1%的人接受了泻药治疗。在过去的20年中,接受任何泻药治疗的患者数量显着不同,有显著的增长趋势。在所有泻药中,接受氧化镁治疗的患者数量,lubiprostone和elobixibat有显著的增长趋势。女性性别,年龄,总DZP等效剂量,和马来酸左甲丙嗪的剂量,奥氮平,喹硫平,zotepine,锂,2021年的卡马西平和卡马西平是20年期间开始使用泻药的重要因素.
    结论:对于用马来酸左旋美丙嗪治疗的患者,需要仔细监测,奥氮平,喹硫平和佐替平.根据治疗指南优化处方可以减少抗精神病药物引起的便秘。
    BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common adverse effect of antipsychotics, but little investigation has been conducted. We aimed to address the factors associated with the initiation of laxative use in the same patients with schizophrenia over a 20-year period.
    METHODS: We enrolled patients with schizophrenia attending each hospital (n = 14) from April 1, 2021, and retrospectively examined all prescriptions as of April 1, 2016, 2011, 2006, and 2001, every 5 years starting in 2021, for this population. 716 participants with complete data were included in the analysis. The Cochran Q test followed by Bonferroni correction and the Cochran-Armitage trend test were used to determine the differences and trends of the frequency of each laxative. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the factors on the initiation of laxative use over a 20-year period.
    RESULTS: Of the patients, 25.1% were treated with laxatives in 2001, and 34.1% were treated in 2021. The numbers of patients treated with any laxatives significantly differed over the 20-year period, with a significant increasing trend. In all laxatives, the numbers of patients treated with magnesium oxide, lubiprostone and elobixibat differed with a significant increasing trend. Female sex, age, the total DZP equivalent dose, and the doses of levomepromazine maleate, olanzapine, quetiapine, zotepine, lithium, and carbamazepine in 2021 were significant factors associated with the initiation of laxative use over the 20-year period.
    CONCLUSIONS: Careful monitoring is needed for patients treated with levomepromazine maleate, olanzapine, quetiapine and zotepine. Optimizing prescriptions according to treatment guidelines could reduce antipsychotic-induced constipation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号