Hospital volume

医院容量
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:辅助化疗(AC)可改善胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)切除术后的预后。然而,以前的研究表明,很大一部分患者没有接受或完成AC治疗.这项全国性研究检查了遗漏或中断AC的危险因素。
    方法:从法国国家行政数据库中提取2012年1月至2017年12月在法国接受PDAC胰腺手术的所有患者的数据。我们认为“省略辅助化疗”(OAC)所有在术后12周内未能接受任何吉西他滨疗程的患者,“AC中断”(IAC)定义为少于18个AC疗程。
    结果:本研究共纳入11599例患者。胰十二指肠切除术是最常见的手术(76.3%),31%的患者经历了严重的术后并发症。OACs和IACs影响了42%和68%的患者,分别。最终,只有18.6%的队列完成了AC.在高容量中心接受手术的患者受术后并发症的影响较小,对接收AC的可能性没有影响。多因素分析显示年龄≥80岁,Charlson合并症指数(CCI)≥4和主要并发症与OAC相关(OR=2.19;CI95%[1.79-2.68];OR=1.75;CI95%[1.41-2.18]和OR=2.37;CI95%[2.15-2.62])。此外,年龄≥80岁和CCI2-3或≥4也是IAC的独立危险因素(OR=1.54,CI95%[1.1-2.15];OR=1.43,CI95%[1.21-1.68];OR=1.47,CI95%[1.02-2.12],分别)。
    结论:顺序手术后再化疗与高退出率相关,尤其是八十岁和合并症患者。
    BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) improves the prognosis after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection. However, previous studies have shown that a large proportion of patients do not receive or complete AC. This national study examined the risk factors for the omission or interruption of AC.
    METHODS: Data of all patients who underwent pancreatic surgery for PDAC in France between January 2012 and December 2017 were extracted from the French National Administrative Database. We considered \"omission of adjuvant chemotherapy\" (OAC) all patients who failed to receive any course of gemcitabine within 12 postoperative weeks and \"interruption of AC\" (IAC) was defined as less than 18 courses of AC.
    RESULTS: A total of 11 599 patients were included in this study. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was the most common procedure (76.3%), and 31% of the patients experienced major postoperative complications. OACs and IACs affected 42% and 68% of the patients, respectively. Ultimately, only 18.6% of the cohort completed AC. Patients who underwent surgery in a high-volume centers were less affected by postoperative complications, with no impact on the likelihood of receiving AC. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 80 years, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 4, and major complications were associated with OAC (OR = 2.19; CI95%[1.79-2.68]; OR = 1.75; CI95%[1.41-2.18] and OR = 2.37; CI95%[2.15-2.62] respectively). Moreover, age ≥ 80 years and CCI 2-3 or ≥ 4 were also independent risk factors for IAC (OR = 1.54, CI95%[1.1-2.15]; OR = 1.43, CI95%[1.21-1.68]; OR = 1.47, CI95%[1.02-2.12], respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: Sequence surgery followed by chemotherapy is associated with a high dropout rate, especially in octogenarian and comorbid patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已建议将肝胰胆管手术集中到更有经验的中心,但仍存在争议。医院数量和危险分层死亡率(RSMR)是医院间比较的指标。我们比较了设施手术量和设施RSMR作为医院质量的代表。
    方法:接受肝脏手术(LC)的患者,胆道(BTC),和胰腺癌(PDAC)在国家癌症数据库(2004-2018)中确定。分层逻辑回归用于创建RSMR的设施特定模型。体积(高与低)由五分位数确定。性能(高与低)由RSMRtercile确定。主要结果包括中位设施RSMR和RSMR分布。模拟了基于体积和RSMR的再分布,并比较了90天死亡率的降低。
    结果:共纳入了在1282个机构接受治疗的106,217名患者;17,695名患者患有LC,23,075有BTC,65,447人患有PDAC。与LC的中等体积中心和低体积中心相比,高体积中心(HVC)的RSMR较低,BTC,和PDAC(所有p<0.001)。与LC的中等性能中心和低性能中心相比,高性能中心(HPC)的RSMR较低,BTC,和PDAC(所有p<0.001)。基于体积的再分配需要16.0名患者进行LC,11.2对于BTC,PDAC重新分配给15、22和20个中心的14.9个,分别,在每个美国人口普查区域内保存的每条生命。基于RSMR的再分配需要4.7名患者进行LC,4.2对于BTC,和4.9对于重新分配给316、403和418中心的PDAC,分别,在每个美国人口普查区域内保存的每条生命。
    结论:HVC和HPC在肝胰胆管肿瘤手术后的90天总体死亡率和风险标准化死亡率最低,但作为衡量医院质量的指标,RSMR可能优于容量。
    BACKGROUND: Centralization of hepatopancreatobiliary procedures to more experienced centers has been recommended but remains controversial. Hospital volume and risk-stratified mortality rates (RSMR) are metrics for interhospital comparison. We compared facility operative volume with facility RSMR as a proxy for hospital quality.
    METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for liver (LC), biliary tract (BTC), and pancreatic (PDAC) cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database (2004-2018). Hierarchical logistic regression was used to create facility-specific models for RSMR. Volume (high versus low) was determined by quintile. Performance (high versus low) was determined by RSMR tercile. Primary outcomes included median facility RSMR and RSMR distributions. Volume- and RSMR-based redistribution was simulated and compared for reductions in 90-day mortality.
    RESULTS: A total of 106,217 patients treated at 1282 facilities were included; 17,695 had LC, 23,075 had BTC, and 65,447 had PDAC. High-volume centers (HVC) had lower RSMR compared with medium-volume centers and low-volume centers for LC, BTC, and PDAC (all p < 0.001). High-performance centers (HPC) had lower RSMR compared with medium-performance centers and low-performance centers for LC, BTC, and PDAC (all p < 0.001). Volume-based redistribution required 16.0 patients for LC, 11.2 for BTC, and 14.9 for PDAC reassigned to 15, 22, and 20 centers, respectively, per life saved within each US census region. RSMR-based redistribution required 4.7 patients for LC, 4.2 for BTC, and 4.9 for PDAC reassigned to 316, 403, and 418 centers, respectively, per life saved within each US census region.
    CONCLUSIONS: HVC and HPC have the lowest overall and risk-standardized 90-day mortality after oncologic hepatopancreatobiliary procedures, but RSMR may outperform volume as a measure of hospital quality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)被证明可有效诱导肿瘤消退。然而,它的毒性往往是致命的。我们试图调查医院容量/结果的关系。在数据库中搜索报告实体器官恶性肿瘤患者免疫检查点抑制剂不良事件(AE)的研究。结果是A)5级,3-4级,心脏相关,和肺相关的AE,和B)量/结果关系的评估。一百四十七项研究符合我们的纳入标准。5级、3-4级和任何级别AE的PER为2.75%(95CI:2.18-3.47),26.69%(95CI:21.60-32.48),和77.80%(95CI:70.91-83.44),分别。肺相关AE的PER为4.56%(95CI:3.76-5.53)。每个中心的年度病例数较高与5级降低显着相关(p=0.019),3-4级(p=0.004),和心脏相关的不良事件(p=0.035)在荟萃回归中。在当前的癌症免疫疗法时代,关于免疫治疗相关AE的早期诊断和治疗的知识至关重要.我们的荟萃分析证明了中心容积在改善预后和降低严重不良事件发生率方面的重要性。
    Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were proven effective in inducing tumor regression. However, its toxicity tends to be fatal. We sought to investigate the hospital volume/outcomes relationship. Databases were searched for studies reporting immune-checkpoint inhibitors adverse events (AEs) in patients with solid-organ malignancies. The outcomes were A) the pooled events rate (PER) of grade 5, grade 3-4, cardiac-related, and pulmonary-related AEs, and B) the assessment of the volume/outcomes relationship. One hundred and forty-seven studies met our inclusion criteria. The PER of grade 5, grade 3-4, and any-grade AEs was 2.75% (95%CI: 2.18-3.47), 26.69% (95%CI: 21.60-32.48), and 77.80% (95%CI: 70.91-83.44), respectively. The PER of pulmonary-related AEs was 4.56% (95%CI: 3.76-5.53). A higher number of annual cases per center was significantly associated with reduced grade 5 (p = 0.019), grade 3-4 (p = 0.004), and cardiac-related AEs (p = 0.035) in the meta-regression. In the current era of cancer immunotherapy, knowledge regarding the early diagnosis and management of immunotherapy-related AEs is essential. Our meta-analysis demonstrates the importance of center volume in improving outcomes and reducing the incidence of severe AEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在全反式维甲酸(ATRA)联合治疗时代,急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)是一种高度可治愈的血液系统恶性肿瘤。然而,尽管ATRA广泛使用,但早期死亡率仅有适度变化.除APL患者的临床特点外,关于医院容量-结局关系和医师容量-结局关系的研究仍然有限.我们的目的是评估医院和医生数量与APL患者早期死亡率之间的关系。患者来自台湾国家健康保险研究数据库(NHIRD)。早期死亡率定义为在诊断后30天内死亡。根据个人累积医院和医师数量将患者分为四组。使用Cox比例风险模型比较不同累积容量组的APL患者全因死亡风险。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计总生存期的概率。所有741例患者被分为四个四分位数体积组。在多变量分析中,只有医师容量与早期死亡率显著相关.与最低四分位数的医师体积相比,最高四分位数的医师体积是早期死亡率的保护因素(HR0.10,95%CI0.02-0.65)。医院特征与早期死亡率无关。在敏感性分析中,使用另外两种不同的早期死亡率定义,结果保持一致.较高的医师容量与较低的早期死亡率独立相关。而医院容量却没有。增强小批量医师的临床专业知识可以确保更好的结果。
    Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a highly curable hematologic malignancy in the era of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) combination treatment. However, only a modest change in early mortality rate has been observed despite the wide availability of ATRA. In addition to the clinical characteristics of APL patients, studies on the hospital volume-outcome relationship and the physician volume-outcome relationship remained limited. We aim to evaluate the association between hospital and physician volume and the early mortality rate among APL patients. The patients were collected from Taiwan\'s National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Early mortality is defined as death within 30 days of diagnosis. Patients were categorized into four groups according to individual cumulative hospital and physician volume. The risk of all-cause mortality in APL patients with different cumulative volume groups was compared using a Cox proportional hazard model. The probability of overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All 741 patients were divided into four quartile volume groups. In the multivariate analysis, only physician volume was significantly associated with early mortality rate. The physician volume of the highest quartile was a protective factor for early mortality compared with the physician volume of the lowest quartile (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.65). Hospital characteristics were not associated with early mortality. In the sensitivity analyses, the results remained consistent using two other different definitions of early mortality. Higher physician volume was independently associated with lower early mortality, while hospital volume was not. Enhancing the clinical expertise of low-volume physicians may ensure better outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是调查军事卫生系统(MHS)中医院和外科医生的关节置换术量。次要目标是在研究期间观察医师实践的中断。
    回顾所有在MHS接受髋关节或膝关节置换术的患者超过5年的时间,以检查医院和外科医生进行全关节置换术(TJA)的体积。我们将医院和外科医生的数量分层为低,中等,和高数量。
    50名外科医生在此期间进行了至少50次髋关节和/或膝关节置换术。这些外科医生占MHS中TJA的75%。当每年按病例分层时,每年的初次全髋关节置换术(THA)中位数为31.4,初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)中位数为47.3.关于主要和修订TJA的音量阈值,所有医院均被归类为THA和单室膝关节置换术/TKA容量低.有0个高音量,7(21.9%)培养基体积,25名(78.1%)低容量THA外科医生;有1名高容量TKA外科医生,17(34.7%)中等体积,31名(63.3%)低容量TKA外科医生。在研究期间,受过研究金培训的外科医生的平均临床活动时间为4.0年,临床不活动的平均持续时间为263.7天(实践期的17.9%)。
    与平民同事相比,容量最大的军事关节成形术外科医生的容量很小。还有长期的临床实践中断。这些发现强调了建立平民-DOD或DOD-VA工作关系的必要性,以便MHS患者在大批量手术中心的大批量外科医生中获得最佳护理。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study is to investigate hospital and surgeon joint arthroplasty volume in the Military Health System (MHS). A secondary aim is to look at interruption in physician practice during the study period.
    UNASSIGNED: Review of all patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty in the MHS over >5-year period to examine hospital and surgeon volume for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We stratified hospital and surgeon volume into low, medium, and high volumes.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty surgeons performed at least 50 hip and/or knee arthroplasties during this period. These surgeons accounted for 75% of TJA in the MHS. When stratified by cases per year, the median primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) per year was 31.4 and primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was 47.3 per year. Regarding the volume threshold for primary and revision TJA, all hospitals were classified as having low volumes for both THA and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty/TKA. There were 0 high volume, 7 (21.9%) medium volume, and 25 (78.1%) low volume THA surgeons; there was 1 high volume TKA surgeon, 17 (34.7%) medium volume, and 31 (63.3%) low volume TKA surgeons. The average duration of clinical activity for fellowship-trained surgeons over the study period was 4.0 years, and the average duration of clinical inactivity was 263.7 days (17.9% of practice period).
    UNASSIGNED: The highest-volume military arthroplasty surgeons have low volume when compared to their civilian colleagues. There are also long periods of clinical practice interruption. These findings stress the need to establish civilian-DOD or DOD-VA working relationships so that MHS patients experience the best possible care by high-volume surgeons in high-volume surgical centers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究提出了一种新的体积-结果(V-O)荟萃分析方法,以确定需要集中的心血管干预措施的最佳年度住院病例量阈值。这种新方法应用于急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)的手术作为说明性示例。
    方法:对三个电子数据库进行了系统搜索(2012年1月1日至2023年3月29日)。主要结果是早期死亡率与年住院病例量的关系。数据按体积四分位数(Qs)表示。使用受限三次样条来证明V-O关系,并应用弯管法确定最佳箱容。对于临床解释,计算需要治疗的数量(NNT)。
    结果:纳入140项研究,包括38276名患者。观察到显著的非线性V-O效应(p<0.001),早期死亡率的四分位数之间存在显着差异(10.3%[Q4]与16.2%[第一季度],p<0.001)。确定的最佳年病例量为38例/年(95%CI37-40例/年,NNT以最佳音量保存在中心的生命与10例/年=21)。对于长期生存率,观察到更明显的四分位数之间的生存差异(10年生存率[Q4]69%vs.[Q1]51%,p<0.001,调整后的HR0.83,95%CI0.75-0.91每四分位数,NNT以高容量拯救生命[Q4]与低容量中心[Q1)=6)。
    结论:使用这种新颖的方法,在统计学上确定了最佳的医院病例量阈值.将ATAAD护理集中到高容量中心可能会改善结果。该方法可以应用于需要集中的各种其他心血管手术。
    The current study proposes a novel volume-outcome (V-O) meta-analytical approach to determine the optimal annual hospital case volume threshold for cardiovascular interventions in need of centralization. This novel method is applied to surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) as an illustrative example.
    A systematic search was applied to three electronic databases (1 January 2012 to 29 March 2023). The primary outcome was early mortality in relation to annual hospital case volume. Data were presented by volume quartiles (Qs). Restricted cubic splines were used to demonstrate the V-O relation, and the elbow method was applied to determine the optimal case volume. For clinical interpretation, numbers needed to treat (NNTs) were calculated.
    One hundred and forty studies were included, comprising 38 276 patients. A significant non-linear V-O effect was observed (P < .001), with a notable between-quartile difference in early mortality rate [10.3% (Q4) vs. 16.2% (Q1)]. The optimal annual case volume was determined at 38 cases/year [95% confidence interval (CI) 37-40 cases/year, NNT to save a life in a centre with the optimal volume vs. 10 cases/year = 21]. More pronounced between-quartile survival differences were observed for long-term survival [10-year survival (Q4) 69% vs. (Q1) 51%, P < .01, adjusted hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.91 per quartile, NNT to save a life in a high-volume (Q4) vs. low-volume centre (Q1) = 6].
    Using this novel approach, the optimal hospital case volume threshold was statistically determined. Centralization of ATAAD care to high-volume centres may lead to improved outcomes. This method can be applied to various other cardiovascular procedures requiring centralization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在调查意大利医院信息系统中接受胃切除术的胃癌(GC)患者在6年内的变化和围手术期死亡率,并确定与90天死亡率相关的危险因素。此外,评估了全国范围内高容量医院和低量医院之间的差异.使用基于国际疾病分类的患者出院记录(HDRs)进行了一项全国性的回顾性研究,第九次修订,临床修改(ICD-9-CM)分类。人类发展报告使用确定性记录链接与国家税务登记处记录相关联。数据来自意大利国家成果评估计划(PNE)。多因素logistic回归用于检查2018年至2020年期间接受部分或全部胃切除术的GC患者90天死亡率的危险因素,并调整合并症。总的来说,在意大利,接受全胃切除术或部分胃切除术的GC患者数量从2015年的5765例稳步下降至2020年的4291例(p<0.001).从2015年(10.8%)到2020年(26.3%),腹腔镜方法的使用增加了一倍以上,从腹腔镜到开放手术的转换率从7.7%降至5.8%。30天和90天死亡率随时间保持稳定(p>0.05)。低容量的医院住院率较高,早期,与高容量医院相比,晚期死亡率(5.9%对3.8%,6.3%比3.8%,和11.8%对7.9%,分别为;p<0.001)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,高龄(调整比值比:3.72;95%[CI]:3.15-4.39;p<0.001),开放入路(校正OR:1.69,95%CI:1.43-1.99,p<0.001)和全胃切除术(校正OR:1.44,95%CI:1.27-1.64,p<0.001)是90天死亡率的独立危险因素.此外,转诊至高容量医院的GC患者在胃切除术后90天内死亡的可能性比在低容量医院接受手术的患者低26%.在6年期间,外科医生实施了微创方法,以减少转换随着时间的推移。集中化与更好的结果相关,而高龄,一个开放的方法,和全胃切除术被确定为90天死亡率的危险因素.
    This study aimed to investigate changes and perioperative mortality over a 6-year period within the Italian Hospital Information System among patients with gastric cancer (GC) who underwent gastrectomies and to identify risk factors associated with 90-day mortality. Additionally, nationwide differences between high and low-volume hospitals were evaluated. A nationwide retrospective study was conducted using patient hospital discharge records (HDRs) based on the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) classification. The HDRs were linked to the National Tax Registry records using deterministic record linkage. The data were obtained from the Italian National Outcomes Evaluation Programme (PNE). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine risk factors for 90-day mortality among patients with GC who underwent partial or total gastrectomies over the period from 2018 to 2020 with adjustment for comorbidities. Overall, the number of patients with GC who underwent total or partial gastrectomies steadily decreased in Italy from 5765 in 2015 to 4291 in 2020 (p < 0.001). The use of the laparoscopic approach more than doubled from 2015 (10.8%) to 2020 (26.3%), with a concomitant conversion rate from laparoscopy to open surgery decreasing from 7.7 to 5.8%. The 30 and 90-day mortality rates remained stable over time (p > 0.05). Low-volume hospitals had higher inpatient, early, and late mortality compared to high-volume hospitals (5.9% vs 3.8%, 6.3% vs 3.8%, and 11.8% vs 7.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that an advanced age (adjusted odds ratio: 3.72; 95% [CI]: 3.15-4.39; p < 0.001), an open approach (adjusted-OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.43-1.99, p < 0.001) and a total gastrectomy (adjusted-OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.27-1.64, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for 90-day mortality. Additionally, patients with GC who referred to high-volume hospitals were 26% less likely to die within 90 days after a gastrectomy than those who underwent surgery in low-volume hospitals. During the 6-year period, surgeons implemented a minimally invasive approach to reduce the conversion over time. Centralisation was associated with better outcomes while advanced age, an open approach, and total gastrectomy were identified as risk factors for 90-day mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    分析荷兰cT1肾细胞癌(RCC)的临床管理与外科医院数量(HV)相关的变化。
    在2014-2020年期间诊断为cT1RCC的患者在荷兰癌症登记处进行了鉴定。检索患者和肿瘤特征。进行肾癌手术的医院按年度HV分类为低(HV<25),中等(HV=25-49)和高(HV>50)。评估了cT1a和cT1b保留肾单位策略随时间的趋势。病人,通过HV比较了(部分)肾切除术的肿瘤和治疗特征。通过HV研究了应用治疗的变化。
    在2014年至2020年之间,10964例患者被诊断为cT1RCC。随着时间的推移,观察到保留肾单位的管理明显增加.大多数cT1a患者接受了部分肾切除术(PN),尽管随着时间的推移,使用的PN较少(从2014年的48%增加到2020年的41%)。主动监测(AS)的应用越来越多(从18%到32%)。对于cT1a,85%在所有高压类别中接受了保留肾单位的管理,无论是与AS,PN或局灶性治疗(FT)。对于T1b,根治性肾切除术(RN)仍然是最常见的治疗方法(从57%到50%)。与中等HV(28%)和低HV(19%)相比,高容量医院的患者在T1b中接受PN(35%)的频率更高。
    HV与荷兰cT1RCC管理的变化有关。EAU指南建议PN作为cT1RCC的首选治疗方法。在大多数cT1a患者中,保留肾单位管理应用于所有HV类别,尽管发现应用策略存在差异,但PN在高HV中的使用频率更高。对于T1b,高HV与RN的应用减少有关,而PN越来越多地使用。因此,在高容量医院中发现更接近指南依从性.
    UNASSIGNED: To analyse variation in clinical management of cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the Netherlands related to surgical hospital volume (HV).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients diagnosed with cT1 RCC during 2014-2020 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient and tumour characteristics were retrieved. Hospitals performing kidney cancer surgery were categorised by annual HV as low (HV < 25), medium (HV = 25-49) and high (HV > 50). Trends over time in nephron-sparing strategies for cT1a and cT1b were evaluated. Patient, tumour and treatment characteristics of (partial) nephrectomies were compared by HV. Variation in applied treatment was studied by HV.
    UNASSIGNED: Between 2014 and 2020, 10 964 patients were diagnosed with cT1 RCC. Over time, a clear increase in nephron-sparing management was observed. The majority of cT1a underwent a partial nephrectomy (PN), although less PNs were applied over time (from 48% in 2014 to 41% in 2020). Active surveillance (AS) was increasingly applied (from 18% to 32%). For cT1a, 85% received nephron-sparing management in all HV categories, either with AS, PN or focal therapy (FT). For T1b, radical nephrectomy (RN) remained the most common treatment (from 57% to 50%). Patients in high-volume hospitals underwent more often PN (35%) for T1b compared with medium HV (28%) and low HV (19%).
    UNASSIGNED: HV is related to variation in the management of cT1 RCC in the Netherlands. The EAU guidelines have recommended PN as preferred treatment for cT1 RCC. In most patients with cT1a, nephron-sparing management was applied in all HV categories, although differences in applied strategy were found and PN was more frequently used in high HV. For T1b, high HV was associated with less appliance of RN, whereas PN was increasingly used. Therefore, closer guideline adherence was found in high-volume hospitals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    需要复杂治疗的患者,比如胰腺手术,可能需要长途旅行,并花费更长的时间离开家,特别是当医疗保健供应在地理上分散时。这引起了人们对平等获得护理的担忧。意大利在行政上分为21个独立的领土,在医疗质量方面是不同的,供应从北向南普遍减少。这项研究旨在评估胰腺手术的适当设施的分布。量化胰腺切除术的远距离移动现象,并测量其对手术死亡率的影响。数据涉及接受胰腺切除术的患者(2014-2016年)。评估胰腺手术的适当设施,根据数量和结果,证实了整个意大利的不均匀分布。意大利南部和中部的迁徙率分别为40.3%和14.6%,分别,患者主要流向意大利北部的高容量中心。在意大利南部和中部接受手术的非迁移患者的调整后死亡率明显高于迁移患者。各地区调整后的死亡率差异很大,从3.2%到16.4%不等。总的来说,这项研究强调了迫切需要解决意大利胰腺手术提供方面的地域差异,并确保所有患者平等获得治疗.
    Patients requiring complex treatments, such as pancreatic surgery, may need to travel long distances and spend extended periods of time away from home, particularly when healthcare provision is geographically dispersed. This raises concerns about equal access to care. Italy is administratively divided into 21 separate territories, which are heterogeneous in terms of healthcare quality, with provision generally decreasing from north to south. This study aimed to evaluate the distribution of adequate facilities for pancreatic surgery, quantify the phenomenon of long-distance mobility for pancreatic resections, and measure its effect on operative mortality. Data refer to patients undergoing pancreatic resections (in the period 2014-2016). The assessment of adequate facilities for pancreatic surgery, based on volume and outcome, confirmed the inhomogeneous distribution throughout Italy. The migration rate from Southern and Central Italy was 40.3% and 14.6%, respectively, with patients mainly directed towards high-volume centers in Northern Italy. Adjusted mortality for non-migrating patients receiving surgery in Southern and Central Italy was significantly higher than that for migrating patients. Adjusted mortality varied greatly among regions, ranging from 3.2% to 16.4%. Overall, this study highlights the urgent need to address the geographical disparities in pancreatic surgery provision in Italy and ensure equal access to care for all patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:将直肠癌管理集中到高容量肿瘤中心已转化为改善肿瘤和生存结果。我们假设单个外科医生的病例数,专业化,和经验在确定直肠癌手术的肿瘤学和术后结局方面可能同样重要。
    方法:对2004年1月至2020年6月期间接受直肠癌手术的患者进行了前瞻性维护的结直肠手术数据库。研究的数据包括人口统计,杜克斯和TNM分期,新辅助治疗,术前风险评估评分,术后并发症,30天再入院率,停留时间(LOS)和长期生存。与国家和国际标准和最佳实践指南相比,主要结局指标是30天死亡率和长期生存率。
    结果:总计,包括87例患者(平均年龄:66岁[范围:36-88])。平均住院时间(LOS)为16.5天(SD6.0)。ICULOS中位数为3天(范围2-17)。总的来说,30天再入院率为16.4%。24例(26.4%)患者术后并发症≥1例。30天手术死亡率为3.45%。5年生存率为66.6%。P-POSSUM评分与术后并发症显著相关(p=0.041),和POSSUM的所有四种变体,CR-POSSUM,P-POSSUM评分和30天死亡率。
    结论:尽管直肠癌服务在机构层面集中化的结果有所改善,外科医生的案例,经验,专业化在机构内获得最佳结果方面具有类似的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: The centralisation of rectal cancer management to high-volume oncology centres has translated to improved oncological and survival outcomes. We hypothesise that individual surgeon caseload, specialisation, and experience may be as significant in determining oncologic and postoperative outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.
    METHODS: A prospectively maintained colorectal surgery database was reviewed for patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery between January 2004 and June 2020. Data studied included demographics, Dukes\' and TNM staging, neoadjuvant treatment, preoperative risk assessment scores, postoperative complications, 30-day readmission rates, length of stay (LOS), and long-term survival. Primary outcome measures were 30-day mortality and long-term survival compared to national and international standards and best practice guidelines.
    RESULTS: In total, 87 patients were included (mean age: 66 years [range: 36-88]). The mean length of stay (LOS) was 16.5 days (SD 6.0). The median ICU LOS was 3 days (range 2-17). Overall, 30-day readmission rate was 16.4%. Twenty-four patients (26.4%) experienced ≥ 1 postoperative complication. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 3.45%. Overall 5-year survival rate was 66.6%. A significant correlation was observed between P-POSSUM scores and postoperative complications (p = 0.041), and all four variants of POSSUM, CR-POSSUM, and P-POSSUM scores and 30-day mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite improved outcomes seen with centralisation of rectal cancer services at an institutional level, surgeon caseload, experience, and specialisation is of similar importance in obtaining optimal outcomes within institutions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号