Hospital volume

医院容量
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:辅助化疗(AC)可改善胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)切除术后的预后。然而,以前的研究表明,很大一部分患者没有接受或完成AC治疗.这项全国性研究检查了遗漏或中断AC的危险因素。
    方法:从法国国家行政数据库中提取2012年1月至2017年12月在法国接受PDAC胰腺手术的所有患者的数据。我们认为“省略辅助化疗”(OAC)所有在术后12周内未能接受任何吉西他滨疗程的患者,“AC中断”(IAC)定义为少于18个AC疗程。
    结果:本研究共纳入11599例患者。胰十二指肠切除术是最常见的手术(76.3%),31%的患者经历了严重的术后并发症。OACs和IACs影响了42%和68%的患者,分别。最终,只有18.6%的队列完成了AC.在高容量中心接受手术的患者受术后并发症的影响较小,对接收AC的可能性没有影响。多因素分析显示年龄≥80岁,Charlson合并症指数(CCI)≥4和主要并发症与OAC相关(OR=2.19;CI95%[1.79-2.68];OR=1.75;CI95%[1.41-2.18]和OR=2.37;CI95%[2.15-2.62])。此外,年龄≥80岁和CCI2-3或≥4也是IAC的独立危险因素(OR=1.54,CI95%[1.1-2.15];OR=1.43,CI95%[1.21-1.68];OR=1.47,CI95%[1.02-2.12],分别)。
    结论:顺序手术后再化疗与高退出率相关,尤其是八十岁和合并症患者。
    BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) improves the prognosis after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection. However, previous studies have shown that a large proportion of patients do not receive or complete AC. This national study examined the risk factors for the omission or interruption of AC.
    METHODS: Data of all patients who underwent pancreatic surgery for PDAC in France between January 2012 and December 2017 were extracted from the French National Administrative Database. We considered \"omission of adjuvant chemotherapy\" (OAC) all patients who failed to receive any course of gemcitabine within 12 postoperative weeks and \"interruption of AC\" (IAC) was defined as less than 18 courses of AC.
    RESULTS: A total of 11 599 patients were included in this study. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was the most common procedure (76.3%), and 31% of the patients experienced major postoperative complications. OACs and IACs affected 42% and 68% of the patients, respectively. Ultimately, only 18.6% of the cohort completed AC. Patients who underwent surgery in a high-volume centers were less affected by postoperative complications, with no impact on the likelihood of receiving AC. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 80 years, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 4, and major complications were associated with OAC (OR = 2.19; CI95%[1.79-2.68]; OR = 1.75; CI95%[1.41-2.18] and OR = 2.37; CI95%[2.15-2.62] respectively). Moreover, age ≥ 80 years and CCI 2-3 or ≥ 4 were also independent risk factors for IAC (OR = 1.54, CI95%[1.1-2.15]; OR = 1.43, CI95%[1.21-1.68]; OR = 1.47, CI95%[1.02-2.12], respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: Sequence surgery followed by chemotherapy is associated with a high dropout rate, especially in octogenarian and comorbid patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在肿瘤细胞减灭术(CRS)治疗结直肠腹膜转移(CRPM)的基础上,以奥沙利铂为基础的腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)在PRODIGE7试验(P7)中未显示任何生存益处。本研究旨在调查CRPM患者单独使用CRS后的围手术期结局是否由医院容量介导,并确定P7对分别使用CRS和CRS/HIPEC治疗的CRPM患者的法国实践的影响。
    方法:通过国家医学数据库收集了法国2013年至2020年间仅接受CRS治疗的CRPM患者的数据。该研究使用了影响我们先前研究确定的90天术后死亡率(POM)的年度CRS单独病例量的临界值,以定义低容量(LV)HIPEC和高容量(HV)HIPEC中心。围手术期结果比较无HIPEC,LV-HIPEC,和HV-HIPEC中心。使用Cochrane-Armitage检验分析了年份和HIPEC比率之间的趋势。
    结果:分析了来自4159个程序的数据。与HV-HIPEC中心相比,在非HIPEC和LV-HIPEC中心治疗的患者年龄较大(p<0.0001),并且Elixhauser合并症指数较高(p<0.0001),手术复杂性较低(p<0.0001)。而主要发病率(MM)率在组间没有差异(p=0.79),HV-HIPEC中心的90天POM低于无HIPEC和LV-HIPEC中心(5.4%vs15%和13.3%;p<0.0001),较低的抢救失败(FTR)(p<0.0001)。P7后,癌症中心的CRS/HIPEC率急剧下降(p<0.001),而仅接受CRS治疗的患者仍转诊至专家中心。
    结论:单独集中CRS可以改善患者选择以及FTR和POM。P7后,CRS/HIPEC主要在癌症中心下降,对提交专家中心的单独CRS病例数量没有任何影响。
    BACKGROUND: Addition of oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in the treatment of peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin (CRPM) did not show any survival benefit in the PRODIGE 7 trial (P7). This study aimed to investigate whether perioperative outcomes after CRS alone for CRPM patients is mediated by hospital volume and to determine the effect of P7 on French practice for CRPM patients treated respectively with CRS alone and CRS/HIPEC.
    METHODS: Data from CRPM patients treated with CRS alone between 2013 and 2020 in France were collected through a national medical database. The study used a cutoff value of the annual CRS-alone caseload affecting the 90-day postoperative mortality (POM) determined from our previous study to define low-volume (LV) HIPEC and high-volume (HV) HIPEC centers. Perioperative outcomes were compared between no-HIPEC, LV-HIPEC, and HV-HIPEC centers. The trend between years and HIPEC rates was analyzed using the Cochrane-Armitage test.
    RESULTS: Data from 4159 procedures were analyzed. The patients treated in no-HIPEC and LV-HIPEC centers were older compared with HV-HIPEC centers (p < 0.0001) and had a higher Elixhauser comorbidity index (p < 0.0001) and less complex surgery (p < 0.0001). Whereas the major morbidity (MM) rate did not differ between groups (p = 0.79), the 90-day POM was lower in HV-HIPEC centers than in no-HIPEC and LV-HIPEC centers (5.4% vs 15% and 13.3%; p < 0.0001), with lower failure-to-rescue (FTR) (p < 0.0001). After P7, the CRS/HIPEC rate decreased drastically in Cancer centers (p < 0.001), whereas patients treated with CRS alone are still referred to expert centers.
    CONCLUSIONS: Centralization of CRS alone should improve patient selection as well as FTR and POM. After P7, CRS/HIPEC decreased mostly in Cancer centers, without any impact on the number of CRS-alone cases referred to expert centers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用不同组的质量指标来确定卵巢癌护理中需要改善的领域。这项研究透明地报告了比利时如何测量(手术)指标以及医院容量与指标结果之间的关联。一个没有任何卵巢癌治疗集中化的国家。
    方法:来自基于人群的比利时癌症登记处,我们选择了2014年至2018年间诊断为交界性恶性或浸润性上皮性卵巢肿瘤的患者,并将其与健康保险和生命状态数据相关联(n=5119).评估了13项诊断和治疗质量指标,并使用针对病例组合进行调整的逻辑回归分析了与医院数量的关联。
    结果:关于诊断和系统治疗的大多数质量指标的国家结果都在预定的目标值附近。其他指标显示结果低于基准:基因检测,分期手术的完整性,淋巴结清扫术切除至少20个盆腔/主动脉旁淋巴结,术后及时开始化疗(42天内)。比利时的卵巢癌护理分散在100多家医院。与接受淋巴结清扫术的高容量医院相比,容量较低的医院显示出较差的指标结果。分期,及时开始化疗和基因检测。此外,在容量较低的医院中,晚期肿瘤的手术频率较低。
    结论:在国家层面上显示较差结果的指标也是那些在低容量医院中与高容量医院相比效果较差的指标,因此支持集中化。国家和研究之间的不同(外科)定义阻碍了国际基准的制定。
    BACKGROUND: Different sets of quality indicators are used to identify areas for improvement in ovarian cancer care. This study reports transparently on how (surgical) indicators were measured and on the association between hospital volume and indicator results in Belgium, a country setting without any centralisation of ovarian cancer care.
    METHODS: From the population-based Belgian Cancer Registry, patients with a borderline malignant or invasive epithelial ovarian tumour diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 were selected and linked to health insurance and vital status data (n = 5119). Thirteen quality indicators on diagnosis and treatment were assessed and the association with hospital volume was analysed using logistic regression adjusted for case-mix.
    RESULTS: The national results for most quality indicators on diagnosis and systemic therapy were around the predefined target value. Other indicators showed results below the benchmark: genetic testing, completeness of staging surgery, lymphadenectomy with at least 20 pelvic/para-aortic lymph nodes removed, and timely start of chemotherapy after surgery (within 42 days). Ovarian cancer care in Belgium is dispersed over 100 hospitals. Lower volume hospitals showed poorer indicator results compared to higher volume hospitals for lymphadenectomy, staging, timely start of chemotherapy and genetic testing. In addition, surgery for advanced stage tumours was performed less often in lower volume hospitals.
    CONCLUSIONS: The indicators that showed poorer results on a national level were also those with poorer results in lower-volume hospitals compared to higher-volume hospitals, consequently supporting centralisation. International benchmarking is hampered by different (surgical) definitions between countries and studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:尽管医学治疗的发展,近50%的克罗恩病(CD)患者在其一生中接受手术。一些研究提出了回肠结肠切除术(ICR)后术后发病率(POM)的一些危险因素。然而,手术住院量对CD中POM的影响尚未得到广泛研究。这项研究旨在评估CDICR后手术医院容量对POM的影响。
    方法:在法国数据库中确定了2013年至2022年在法国接受ICR的所有CD患者,信息系统化方案。使用卡方自动交互检测器,我们确定了高手术量中心(≥6ICR/年)和低手术量中心(<6ICR/年)的分界值.主要结果是住院期间主要POM的评估。根据手术容量中心评估POM。使用Elixhauser合并症指数(ECI)对患者的合并症进行分类。
    结果:共确定了4,205名患者,与低手术量中心(9.1%)相比,高手术量中心(6.2%)住院期间的主要POM显著降低(p=0.0004).经过多变量分析,与主要POM相关的独立因素是手术住院量(P=0.024),男性(P=0.029),ECI≥1(P<0.001),和少量POM(P<0.001)。
    结论:CD的ICR后的主要POM与外科医院容量密切相关。CD手术的集中化是可取的,尤其是有严重合并症的患者。
    OBJECTIVE: Despite the development of medical therapy, nearly 50% of patients with Crohn\'s disease [CD] undergo surgery during their lifetime. Several studies have suggested some risk factors for postoperative morbidity [POM] after ileocolic resection [ICR]. However, the impact of surgical hospital volume on POM in CD has not been extensively studied. This study aimed to assess the impact of surgical hospital volume on POM after ICR for CD.
    METHODS: All patients with CD who underwent ICR in France between 2013 and 2022 were identified in the French Database, Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d\'Information. Using the Chi-square automatic interaction detector, we determined the cut-off value to split high-surgical-volume [≥6 ICRs/year] and low-surgical-volume centres [<6 ICRs/year]. The primary outcome was the evaluation of major POM during hospitalization. POM was evaluated according to the surgical volume centre. The Elixhauser comorbidity index [ECI] was used to categorize the comorbidities of patients.
    RESULTS: A total of 4205 patients were identified, and the major POM during hospitalization was significantly [p = 0.0004] lower in the high-surgical-volume [6.2%] compared to low-surgical-volume centres [9.1%]. After multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with major POM were surgical hospital volume [p = 0.024], male sex [p = 0.029], ECI ≥ 1 [p < 0.001], and minor POM [p < 0.001].
    CONCLUSIONS: Major POM after ICR for CD is closely associated with surgical hospital volume. Centralization of surgery for CD is desirable, especially in patients with major comorbidities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:本研究的目的是调查重症颅脑损伤(TBI)儿科患者住院人数与住院死亡率之间的关系。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用了2010年至2018年日本创伤数据库的数据,特别是重症TBI儿科患者的数据(格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]评分<9,头部简化损伤量表评分>2)。医院容量定义为整个研究期间患有严重TBI的儿科患者的数量。医院容量被归类为低(参考类别:1-9名患者),中间(10-17名患者),或高(>18名患者)容量。进行了多因素混合效应逻辑回归分析,以确定医院容量类别与住院死亡率之间的关系。使用开颅手术和严重躯干损伤的数据进行亚组分析。在敏感性分析中,GCS评分为3分的患者,院间转院,并排除主要的重症监护病房并发症.
    结果:共有1148名儿童重度TBI患者,年龄中位数为12岁(IQR7-16岁),包括在141家医院接受治疗。总的来说,236例患者(20.6%)在医院死亡。多因素分析显示,医院容量与住院死亡率之间没有显着关联(高容量:OR1.15,95%CI0.80-1.64;中等容量:OR0.89,95%CI0.62-1.26)。亚组和敏感性分析显示出相似的结果。
    结论:重症TBI儿科患者的医院容量可能与住院死亡率无关。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank between 2010 and 2018, specifically those of pediatric patients with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score < 9 and head Abbreviated Injury Scale score > 2). Hospital volume was defined as the number of pediatric patients with severe TBI throughout the study period. Hospital volume was categorized as low (reference category: 1-9 patients), middle (10-17 patients), or high (> 18 patients) volume. Multivariate mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between hospital volume categories and in-hospital mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed using data on craniotomy and the presence of severe torso injuries. In the sensitivity analyses, patients with a GCS score of 3, interhospital transfer, and major intensive care unit complications were excluded.
    RESULTS: A total of 1148 pediatric patients with severe TBI, with a median age of 12 years (IQR 7-16 years), treated at 141 hospitals were included. In total, 236 patients (20.6%) died in the hospital. Multivariate analysis showed no significant association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality (high volume: OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.80-1.64; middle volume: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.62-1.26). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses showed similar results.
    CONCLUSIONS: Hospital volume may not be associated with in-hospital mortality in pediatric patients with severe TBI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:间质性肺疾病(ILD)是一组弥漫性实质性肺疾病,可引起肺间质的炎症和纤维化。组织病理学检查是准确诊断ILD类型的关键,通常进行支气管镜检查(BS)以收集肺组织。本研究旨在确定医院容量与ILD患者BS后预后之间的关系。
    方法:从日本诊断程序组合数据库中提取2010年7月1日至2021年3月31日期间接受BS治疗的ILD患者的住院数据。BS的年度住院量分为四个(非常低[≤15例/年],低[16-29例/年],高[30-54例/年],和极高[≥55例/年]量)组。主要结果是BS后14天的全因死亡率。使用多种插补方法,然后使用符合广义估计方程的多变量逻辑回归分析来估计医院数量与BS后14天死亡率之间的关联。
    结果:来自1002家医院的89,454例ILD患者接受BS治疗。BS后14天内的全因死亡率为0.77%。在死亡率和医院数量之间观察到相反的趋势。与非常低的医院容量组相比,医院容量非常大的组与较低的死亡率显著相关(校正比值比=0.63,95%置信区间:0.48~0.85,p=0.002).
    结论:住院ILD患者在BS后14天内,医院容量与全因死亡率呈负相关。
    BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a group of diffuse parenchymal lung disorders that cause inflammation and fibrosis in the interstitium of the lungs. Histopathological examination is pivotal to accurately diagnose the type of ILD, and bronchoscopy (BS) is often performed to collect lung tissue. This study aimed to determine the relationship between hospital volume and outcomes following BS in patients with ILD.
    METHODS: Inpatient data on patients with ILD who underwent BS between July 1, 2010 and March 31, 2021 were extracted from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. The annual hospital volume of BS was categorized into four (very low- [≤15 cases/year], low- [16-29 cases/year], high- [30-54 cases/year], and very high- [≥55 cases/year] volume) groups. The primary outcome was all-cause 14-day mortality after BS. Multiple imputation methods followed by multivariable logistic regression analyses fitted with generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the association between hospital volume and 14-day mortality after BS.
    RESULTS: A total of 89,454 patients with ILD from 1002 hospitals underwent BS. The all-cause mortality within 14 days after BS was 0.77%. An inverse trend was observed between mortality and hospital volume. Compared with the very low-hospital volume group, the very high-hospital volume group was significantly associated with a lower mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.85, p = 0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: Hospital volume was inversely associated with all-cause mortality within 14 days after BS for hospitalized patients with ILD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在调查意大利医院信息系统中接受胃切除术的胃癌(GC)患者在6年内的变化和围手术期死亡率,并确定与90天死亡率相关的危险因素。此外,评估了全国范围内高容量医院和低量医院之间的差异.使用基于国际疾病分类的患者出院记录(HDRs)进行了一项全国性的回顾性研究,第九次修订,临床修改(ICD-9-CM)分类。人类发展报告使用确定性记录链接与国家税务登记处记录相关联。数据来自意大利国家成果评估计划(PNE)。多因素logistic回归用于检查2018年至2020年期间接受部分或全部胃切除术的GC患者90天死亡率的危险因素,并调整合并症。总的来说,在意大利,接受全胃切除术或部分胃切除术的GC患者数量从2015年的5765例稳步下降至2020年的4291例(p<0.001).从2015年(10.8%)到2020年(26.3%),腹腔镜方法的使用增加了一倍以上,从腹腔镜到开放手术的转换率从7.7%降至5.8%。30天和90天死亡率随时间保持稳定(p>0.05)。低容量的医院住院率较高,早期,与高容量医院相比,晚期死亡率(5.9%对3.8%,6.3%比3.8%,和11.8%对7.9%,分别为;p<0.001)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,高龄(调整比值比:3.72;95%[CI]:3.15-4.39;p<0.001),开放入路(校正OR:1.69,95%CI:1.43-1.99,p<0.001)和全胃切除术(校正OR:1.44,95%CI:1.27-1.64,p<0.001)是90天死亡率的独立危险因素.此外,转诊至高容量医院的GC患者在胃切除术后90天内死亡的可能性比在低容量医院接受手术的患者低26%.在6年期间,外科医生实施了微创方法,以减少转换随着时间的推移。集中化与更好的结果相关,而高龄,一个开放的方法,和全胃切除术被确定为90天死亡率的危险因素.
    This study aimed to investigate changes and perioperative mortality over a 6-year period within the Italian Hospital Information System among patients with gastric cancer (GC) who underwent gastrectomies and to identify risk factors associated with 90-day mortality. Additionally, nationwide differences between high and low-volume hospitals were evaluated. A nationwide retrospective study was conducted using patient hospital discharge records (HDRs) based on the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) classification. The HDRs were linked to the National Tax Registry records using deterministic record linkage. The data were obtained from the Italian National Outcomes Evaluation Programme (PNE). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine risk factors for 90-day mortality among patients with GC who underwent partial or total gastrectomies over the period from 2018 to 2020 with adjustment for comorbidities. Overall, the number of patients with GC who underwent total or partial gastrectomies steadily decreased in Italy from 5765 in 2015 to 4291 in 2020 (p < 0.001). The use of the laparoscopic approach more than doubled from 2015 (10.8%) to 2020 (26.3%), with a concomitant conversion rate from laparoscopy to open surgery decreasing from 7.7 to 5.8%. The 30 and 90-day mortality rates remained stable over time (p > 0.05). Low-volume hospitals had higher inpatient, early, and late mortality compared to high-volume hospitals (5.9% vs 3.8%, 6.3% vs 3.8%, and 11.8% vs 7.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that an advanced age (adjusted odds ratio: 3.72; 95% [CI]: 3.15-4.39; p < 0.001), an open approach (adjusted-OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.43-1.99, p < 0.001) and a total gastrectomy (adjusted-OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.27-1.64, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for 90-day mortality. Additionally, patients with GC who referred to high-volume hospitals were 26% less likely to die within 90 days after a gastrectomy than those who underwent surgery in low-volume hospitals. During the 6-year period, surgeons implemented a minimally invasive approach to reduce the conversion over time. Centralisation was associated with better outcomes while advanced age, an open approach, and total gastrectomy were identified as risk factors for 90-day mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:成功的游离皮瓣重建手术与医院容量之间的关联尚未明确。本研究旨在回顾性分析在日本全国外科注册系统中注册的游离皮瓣手术的结果,以阐明游离皮瓣存活与设施之间的关系。
    方法:我们分析了2017-2020年期间在日本407家工厂进行的19,482次游离皮瓣的数据。在适应性爱之后,年龄,和疾病分类不同,我们根据每年进行的平均游离皮瓣手术次数,研究了不同设施之间皮瓣存活率的差异。
    结果:总坏死率为2.8%。在所有程序中,14.9%,12.9%,33.4%,38.8%的患者在每年平均自由皮瓣手术次数<10、10-19、20-49和≥50的设施中进行,分别,总坏死率分别为6.0%,3.8%,2.1%,和1.7%,分别。每年≥50例的设施相对于<10例的设施,皮瓣坏死的比值比和95%置信区间为非乳房重建病例为2.70(1.98-3.68),乳房重建病例为5.72(2.77-11.8)。
    结论:这项对全国整形外科数据库的分析显示,在每年平均游离皮瓣手术数量较低的机构中,游离皮瓣手术发生总坏死的风险较高。应采取措施将案件汇总到高容量中心或改善低容量中心的管理。
    The association between successful reconstructive surgery with a free flap and hospital volume has not been well established. This study was designed to retrospectively analyze the outcome of free-flap surgery registered in a nationwide surgical registration system in Japan to clarify the relationship between free-flap survival and facilities\' average annual number of free-flap surgeries.
    We analyzed data from 19,482 free flaps performed during 2017-2020 at 407 facilities throughout Japan. After adjusting for sex, age, and disease classification that differ between the groups, we examined the differences in the flap survival rates among the different facilities in terms of the average number of free-flap surgeries performed annually.
    The total overall necrosis rate was 2.8%. Of all procedures, 14.9%, 12.9%, 33.4%, and 38.8% were performed at facilities with an average number of free-flap procedures <10, 10-19, 20-49, and ≥ 50 per year, respectively, and the respective rates of total necrosis were 6.0%, 3.8%, 2.1%, and 1.7%, respectively. The odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of flap necrosis for facilities with ≥ 50 cases per year relative to those <10 were 2.70 (1.98-3.68) for nonbreast reconstruction cases and 5.72 (2.77-11.8) for breast reconstruction cases.
    This analysis of a nationwide plastic surgery database showed that free-flap surgeries in institutions with a low average annual number of free-flap surgeries had a higher risk of total necrosis. Measures should be taken to either aggregate cases into high-volume centers or improve management at low-volume centers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:胰腺癌(PC)是所有实体癌中预后最差的癌症之一。已显示医院容量与接受手术的PC患者的预后显着相关。尽管如此,转移性PC患者的住院量与预后之间的关系尚不清楚.这项研究旨在使用大规模的基于人群的癌症登记数据来检查转移性PC患者的医院容量与预后之间的关系。
    方法:这项回顾性观察研究是使用大阪癌症注册数据库的数据进行的。获得10年(2009-2018年)转移性PC患者的数据。医院分为高容量医院(HVHs;诊断为PC的患者≥240例,持续10年),中型医院(MVHs;120-239例诊断为PC10年的患者),和低容量医院(LVHs;<120例诊断为PC10年)。进行多因素分析以确定与总生存期(OS)相关的因素。
    结果:分析包括8,929例转移性PC患者。HVH的中位OS明显优于MVH和LVH。多变量分析调整为医院容量,年龄,原发肿瘤部位,诊断年份,化疗,放疗显示医院体积是与OS相关的独立因素(HVHs与MVHs:危险比[HR],1.10;95%置信区间[CI],1.03-1.16;P=0.003,HVHs与LVHs:HR,1.20;95%CI,1.13-1.27;P<0.001)。
    结论:医院容量是转移性PC患者的独立预后因素,提示医院容量和治疗结果之间的关联。
    OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic cancer (PC) has one of the worst prognoses among all solid cancers. Hospital volume has been shown to be significantly associated with outcomes in patients with PC undergoing surgery. Nonetheless, the association between hospital volume and prognosis in patients with metastatic PC remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between hospital volume and prognosis in patients with metastatic PC using large-scale population-based cancer registry data.
    METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted using data from the Osaka Cancer Registry database. Data of patients with metastatic PC over 10 years (2009-2018) were obtained. Hospitals were categorized into high-volume hospitals (HVHs; ≥ 240 patients diagnosed with PC for 10 years), middle-volume hospitals (MVHs; 120-239 patients diagnosed with PC for 10 years), and low-volume hospitals (LVHs; < 120 patients diagnosed with PC for 10 years). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS).
    RESULTS: The analysis included 8,929 patients with metastatic PC. Median OS was significantly more favorable in HVHs than in MVHs and LVHs. Multivariate analysis adjusted for hospital volume, age, primary tumor site, year of diagnosis, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy revealed that hospital volume was an independent factor associated with OS (HVHs vs. MVHs: hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.16; P = 0.003, HVHs vs. LVHs: HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.13-1.27; P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Hospital volume is an independent prognostic factor in patients with metastatic PC, suggesting an association between hospital volume and treatment outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    分析荷兰cT1肾细胞癌(RCC)的临床管理与外科医院数量(HV)相关的变化。
    在2014-2020年期间诊断为cT1RCC的患者在荷兰癌症登记处进行了鉴定。检索患者和肿瘤特征。进行肾癌手术的医院按年度HV分类为低(HV<25),中等(HV=25-49)和高(HV>50)。评估了cT1a和cT1b保留肾单位策略随时间的趋势。病人,通过HV比较了(部分)肾切除术的肿瘤和治疗特征。通过HV研究了应用治疗的变化。
    在2014年至2020年之间,10964例患者被诊断为cT1RCC。随着时间的推移,观察到保留肾单位的管理明显增加.大多数cT1a患者接受了部分肾切除术(PN),尽管随着时间的推移,使用的PN较少(从2014年的48%增加到2020年的41%)。主动监测(AS)的应用越来越多(从18%到32%)。对于cT1a,85%在所有高压类别中接受了保留肾单位的管理,无论是与AS,PN或局灶性治疗(FT)。对于T1b,根治性肾切除术(RN)仍然是最常见的治疗方法(从57%到50%)。与中等HV(28%)和低HV(19%)相比,高容量医院的患者在T1b中接受PN(35%)的频率更高。
    HV与荷兰cT1RCC管理的变化有关。EAU指南建议PN作为cT1RCC的首选治疗方法。在大多数cT1a患者中,保留肾单位管理应用于所有HV类别,尽管发现应用策略存在差异,但PN在高HV中的使用频率更高。对于T1b,高HV与RN的应用减少有关,而PN越来越多地使用。因此,在高容量医院中发现更接近指南依从性.
    UNASSIGNED: To analyse variation in clinical management of cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the Netherlands related to surgical hospital volume (HV).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients diagnosed with cT1 RCC during 2014-2020 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient and tumour characteristics were retrieved. Hospitals performing kidney cancer surgery were categorised by annual HV as low (HV < 25), medium (HV = 25-49) and high (HV > 50). Trends over time in nephron-sparing strategies for cT1a and cT1b were evaluated. Patient, tumour and treatment characteristics of (partial) nephrectomies were compared by HV. Variation in applied treatment was studied by HV.
    UNASSIGNED: Between 2014 and 2020, 10 964 patients were diagnosed with cT1 RCC. Over time, a clear increase in nephron-sparing management was observed. The majority of cT1a underwent a partial nephrectomy (PN), although less PNs were applied over time (from 48% in 2014 to 41% in 2020). Active surveillance (AS) was increasingly applied (from 18% to 32%). For cT1a, 85% received nephron-sparing management in all HV categories, either with AS, PN or focal therapy (FT). For T1b, radical nephrectomy (RN) remained the most common treatment (from 57% to 50%). Patients in high-volume hospitals underwent more often PN (35%) for T1b compared with medium HV (28%) and low HV (19%).
    UNASSIGNED: HV is related to variation in the management of cT1 RCC in the Netherlands. The EAU guidelines have recommended PN as preferred treatment for cT1 RCC. In most patients with cT1a, nephron-sparing management was applied in all HV categories, although differences in applied strategy were found and PN was more frequently used in high HV. For T1b, high HV was associated with less appliance of RN, whereas PN was increasingly used. Therefore, closer guideline adherence was found in high-volume hospitals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号