UNASSIGNED: It remains controversial whether esophageal cancer patients may benefit from esophagectomy in specialized high-volume hospitals. Here, the effect of hospital volume on overall survival (OS) of esophageal cancer patients post esophagectomy was assessed.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant published articles between January 1990 and May 2022. The primary outcome was OS after esophagectomy in high- vs. low-volume hospitals. Random effect models were applied for all meta-analyses. Subgroup analysis were performed based on volume grouping, sample size, study country, year of publication, follow-up or study quality. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using the leave-one-out method. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the study quality. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidance, and was registered (identifier: INPLASY202270023).
UNASSIGNED: A total of twenty-four studies with 113,014 patients were finally included in the meta-analysis. A significant improvement in OS after esophagectomy was observed in high-volume hospitals as compared to that in their low-volume counterparts (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.71-0.84, P < 0.01). Next, we conducted subgroup analysis based on volume grouping category, consistent results were found that high-volume hospitals significantly improved OS after esophagectomy than their low-volume counterparts. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analyses further confirmed that all the results were robust.
UNASSIGNED: Esophageal cancer should be centralized in high-volume hospitals.

UNASSIGNED: The impact of hospital volume on the long-term survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been well assessed in China, especially for stage I-III stage ESCC. We performed a large sample size study to assess the relationships between hospital volume and the effectiveness of ESCC treatment and the hospital volume value at the lowest risk of all-cause mortality after esophagectomy in China.
UNASSIGNED: To investigate the prognostic value of hospital volume for assessing postoperative long-term survival of ESCC patients in China.
UNASSIGNED: The date of 158,618 patients with ESCC were collected from a database (1973-2020) established by the State Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, the database includes 500,000 patients with detailed clinical information of pathological diagnosis and staging, treatment approaches and survival follow-up for esophageal and gastric cardia cancers. Intergroup comparisons of patient and treatment characteristics were conducted with the X2 test and analysis of variance. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test was used to draw the survival curves for the variables tested. A Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the independent prognostic factors for overall survival. The relationship between hospital volume and all-cause mortality was assessed using restricted cubic splines from Cox proportional hazards models. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.
UNASSIGNED: In both 1973-1996 and 1997-2020, patients with stage I-III stage ESCC who underwent surgery in high volume hospitals had better survival than those who underwent surgery in low volume hospitals (both P<0.05). And high volume hospital was an independent factor for better prognosis in ESCC patients. The relationship between hospital volume and the risk of all-cause mortality was half-U-shaped, but overall, hospital volume was a protective factor for esophageal cancer patients after surgery (HR<1). The concentration of hospital volume associated with the lowest risk of all-cause mortality was 1027 cases/year in the overall enrolled patients.
UNASSIGNED: Hospital volume can be used as an indicator to predict the postoperative survival of ESCC patients. Our results suggest that the centralized management of esophageal cancer surgery is meaningful to improve the survival of ESCC patients in China, but the hospital volume should preferably not be higher than 1027 cases/year.
UNASSIGNED: Hospital volume is considered to be a prognostic factor for many complex diseases. However, the impact of hospital volume on long-term survival after esophagectomy has not been well evaluated in China. Based on a large sample size of 158,618 ESCC patients in China spanning 47 years (1973-2020), We found that hospital volume can be used as a predictor of postoperative survival in patients with ESCC, and identified hospital volume thresholds with the lowest risk of death from all causes. This may provide an important basis for patients to choose hospitals and have a significant impact on the centralized management of hospital surgery.

Open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair is a complex and challenging operation with a high incidence of serious complications, and high perioperative mortality and morbidity. Left heart bypass (LHB) is a circulatory support system used to perfuse the distal aorta during TAAA operation, and the advantages of LHB include guaranteeing distal perfusion, reducing the use of heparin, and diminishing the risk of bleeding and postoperative neurological deficits. In China, the circuit for TAAA repair is deficient, and far from the perfusion requirements. We designed a modular multifunctional LHB circuit for TAAA repair. The modular circuit consisted of cannulation pipelines, functional consumables connection pipelines, and accessory pipelines. The accessory pipelines make up lines for selective visceral perfusion and kidney perfusion, suckers and rapid infusion. The circuit can be assembled according to surgical requirements. The ultrafilter and heat exchanger are integrated into the circuit to fulfill the basic demands of LHB. The LHB circuit also has pipelines for selective visceral perfusion to the celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery and renal perfusion pipelines. Meanwhile, the reserved pipelines facilitate the quick switch from LHB to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The reserved pipelines reduce the time of reassembling the CPB circuit. Moreover, the rapid infusion was integrated into the LHB circuit, which can rapid infusion when massive hemorrhage during the open procedures such as exposure and reconstruction of the aorta. The ultrafiltration can diminish the consequent hemodilution of hemorrhage and rapid infusion. A hemoperfusion cartridge also can be added to reduce the systemic inflammatory during operation. The circuit can meet the needs of LHB and quickly switch to conventional CPB. No oxygenator was required during LHB, which reduce the use of heparin and reduce the risk of bleeding. The heat exchanger contributes to temperature regulation; ultrafiltration, arterial filter, and rapid-infusion facilitated the blood volume management and are useful to maintain hemodynamic stability. This circuit made the assembly of the LHB circuit more easily, and more efficient, which may contribute to the TAAA repair operation performed in lower volume centers easily. 26 patients who received TAAA repair under the modular multifunctional LHB from January 2018-March 2022 were analyzed, and we achieved acceptable clinical outcomes. The in-hospital mortality and 30-day postoperative mortality were 15.4%, and the postoperative incidences of paraparesis (4%), stroke (4%), and AKI need hemodialysis (12%) were not particularly high, based on the limited patients sample size in short research period duration.

OBJECTIVE: Limited evidence is available regarding the associations of centralization with gastric cancer patients\' quality of care in high surgical volume settings. The current study aimed to explore the effects of hospital volume and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) on in-hospital mortality, total cost, and length of stay for Chinese gastrectomy patients in a nationwide database.
METHODS: We extracted data on gastrectomy for gastric cancer from the Hospital Quality Monitoring System Database between 2013 and 2018. Hospital volume was divided into 4 quartiles: low (1-83 cases per year), medium (84-238 cases), high (239-579 cases), and very high (580-1,193 cases). The HHI was divided into 3 categories: highly concentrated (>2,500), moderately concentrated (1,500-2,500), and unconcentrated (<1,500). We used mixed-effects models to analyze the data while accounting for data clustering.
RESULTS: We analyzed 125,683 patients in 515 institutions. In the multivariable analyses, hospital volume was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality [medium vs. low: odds ratio (OR)=0.61, 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=0.43-0.84, P=0.003; high: OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.38-0.87, P=0.009; and very high: OR=0.33, 95% CI=0.18-0.61, P<0.001) and length of stay (highvs. low: β=-0.036, 95% CI=-0.071--0.002, P=0.039) but not with total cost. Hospitals located in unconcentrated provinces had higher in-hospital mortality (OR=1.52, 95% CI=1.03-2.26, P=0.036) and longer lengths of stay (β=0.024, 95% CI=0.001-0.047, P=0.041) than hospitals located in highly concentrated provinces.
CONCLUSIONS: Centralization of gastrectomy, measured by hospital volume and the HHI, was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality and shortened length of stay without increasing total cost. These results support the strategy of centralizing gastrectomy in high-volume settings.

In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the relationship between hospital volume and clinical outcomes for inpatients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in tertiary A hospitals in Shanxi, China (N = 12 931). In-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total cost were measured. The crude in-hospital mortality rate was 1.69%. Adjusted in-hospital mortality was significantly lower for medium-volume hospitals (odds ratio (OR) = 0.605, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.411-0.900) compared with low-volume hospitals. LOS in medium- and high-volume hospitals were 0.915 (95% CI = 0.880-0.951) and 1.069 (95% CI = 1.041-1.098) days longer than in low-volume hospitals, respectively. The cost of inpatients attending low- and high-volume hospitals (OR = 1.180, 95% CI = 1.140-1.221) was higher than that of medium-volume hospitals (OR = 0.897, 95% CI = 0.868-0.926). These results inform health care policy in countries with strained medical resources.

Joint arthroplasty is a particularly complex orthopaedic surgical procedure performed on joints, including the hip, knee, shoulder, ankle, elbow, wrist and even digit joints. Increasing evidence from volume-outcomes research supports the finding that patients undergoing joint arthroplasty in high-volume hospitals or by high-volume surgeons achieve better outcomes, and minimum case load requirements have been established in some areas. However, the relationships between hospital/surgeon volume and outcomes in patients undergoing arthroplasty are not fully understood. Furthermore, whether elective arthroplasty should be restricted to high-volume hospitals or surgeons remains in dispute, and little is known regarding where the thresholds should be set for different types of joint arthroplasties.
This is a protocol for a suite of systematic reviews and dose-response meta-analyses, which will be amended and updated in conjunction with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. Electronic databases, including PubMed and Embase, will be searched for observational studies examining the relationship between the hospital or surgeon volume and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing primary or revision of joint arthroplasty. We will use records management software for study selection and a predefined standardised file for data extraction and management. Quality will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the meta-analysis, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be performed using Stata statistical software. Once the volume-outcome relationships are established, we will examine the potential non-linear relationships between hospital/surgeon volume and outcomes and detect whether thresholds or turning points exist.
Ethical approval is not required, because these studies are based on aggregated published data. The results of this suite of systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication.
CRD42017056639.