Consumer Product Safety

消费品安全
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人类暴露于消费品中的危险化学品。2019年,华盛顿州通过了《健康人群和普吉特海湾污染预防法》。该法律旨在减少消费品中的危险化学品,保护人类健康和环境。该法律指示华盛顿州生态部评估产品中发现的化学品和化学类别,确定是否有更安全的替代品,并做出监管决定。
    为了实施法律,生态部制定了一个基于危险的框架,以确定化学品类别的更安全替代品。
    我们开发了一个基于危险的框架,被称为“更安全的标准”,“设置一个透明的条,以确定新的化学替代品是否比现有的化学类别更安全。我们的“更安全标准”是建立在现有危险评估方法和已发布的评估化学品和化学品类别的方法基础上的框架。
    我们通过对两类消费品中邻苯二甲酸酯化学类别的案例研究来描述我们标准的实施:乙烯基地板和个人护理和美容产品中使用的香料。还讨论了指导我们决策过程的其他背景和考虑因素,以及我们方法的好处和局限性。本文介绍了我们开发和实施基于危险的框架,以解决消费品中的化学品类别,并将帮助其他致力于构建和采用类似方法的人。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13549.
    UNASSIGNED: Humans are exposed to hazardous chemicals found in consumer products. In 2019, the Pollution Prevention for Healthy People and Puget Sound Act was passed in Washington State. This law is meant to reduce hazardous chemicals in consumer products and protect human health and the environment. The law directs the Washington State Department of Ecology to assess chemicals and chemical classes found in products, determine whether there are safer alternatives, and make regulatory determinations.
    UNASSIGNED: To implement the law, the Department of Ecology developed a hazard-based framework for identifying safer alternatives to classes of chemicals.
    UNASSIGNED: We developed a hazard-based framework, termed the \"Criteria for Safer,\" to set a transparent bar for determining whether new chemical alternatives are safer than existing classes of chemicals. Our \"Criteria for Safer\" is a framework that builds on existing hazard assessment methodologies and published approaches for assessing chemicals and chemical classes.
    UNASSIGNED: We describe implementation of our criteria using a case study on the phthalates chemical class in two categories of consumer products: vinyl flooring and fragrances used in personal care and beauty products. Additional context and considerations that guided our decision-making process are also discussed, as well as benefits and limitations of our approach. This paper gives insight into our development and implementation of a hazard-based framework to address classes of chemicals in consumer products and will aid others working to build and employ similar approaches. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13549.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童阻碍包对儿童来说难以打开,因此保护他们免于意外地接触包内的危险内容物。然而,如果成年人很难打开包装,在正常使用场景中,这可能会导致更高的发生率的包被打开。这项研究探讨了两种类型的儿童阻碍液体衣物洗涤剂胶囊包装之间在易用性和封闭依从性方面的差异。这两个包,“捏合并抬起”和“按下并抬起”,有不同的打开和关闭机制。“按下并抬起”还包括声音“单击”信号,以确认用户完全关闭。这项研究是在两项研究中进行的。在两项研究中,根据参与者通常的储存和使用习惯,这些包装被用于他们的家庭,作为他们目前的液体衣物洗涤剂胶囊包装的替代品。所有参与者都有年幼的孩子和他们住在一起。在研究1中,从德国的99名成年参与者收集了自我报告的封闭和易用性数据。他们在家中使用每个包裹10天。研究2扩展了研究1,通过使用包装内传感器对每个包装进行10天的客观评估来测量闭合率。还收集了自我报告的关闭和易用性数据。研究2在英国有87名参与者。两项研究的结果表明,与“Pinch&Lift”相比,“Pinch&Lift”带有听得见的“Click”关闭信号的参与者评分明显更容易打开和关闭,并且自我报告的关闭率更高。此外,研究2结果表明,使用基于传感器测量的闭合合规性的“按压和提升”,闭合率更高。一起,结果表明,过渡到具有儿童阻碍的机制的包装,并且成人更容易使用声音闭合信号,如“按下并抬起”系统,有可能通过减少成年用户打开包装的可能性来减少儿童从包装中接触胶囊。最终,这种包装可以保护儿童免受一系列消费品的潜在中毒伤害。
    Child impeding packs are difficult for children to open so protect them from unintended access to hazardous contents inside the pack. However, if packs are difficult for adults to open, in normal usage scenarios, this may result in a higher occurrence of packs being left open. This research explores differences in ease of usage and closure compliance between two types of child impeding packs of liquid laundry detergent capsules. The two packs, \"Pinch & Lift\" and \"Press & Lift\", had different opening and closing mechanisms. \"Press & Lift\" also included an audible \"click\" signal to confirm complete closure to the user. The research was performed across two studies. In both studies, the packs were used in participants\' homes according to their usual storage and usage practices as replacements to their current liquid laundry detergent capsule pack. All participants had small children living with them in their household. In Study 1, self-reported closure and ease of use data was collected from 99 adult participants in Germany. They used each package in their home for 10 days. Study 2 extended Study 1 by measuring closure rates with an objective assessment using in pack sensors for a 10-day period for each pack. Self-reported closure and ease of use data were also collected. Study 2 was conducted with 87 participants in the United Kingdom. Results across both studies showed \"Press & Lift\" with the audible \"Click\" close signal to be rated by participants to be significantly easier to open and close and have a higher self-reported closure rate than \"Pinch & Lift\". In addition, Study 2 results demonstrated higher closure rates using \"Press & Lift\" based on the sensor-measured closure compliance. Together, the results suggest transition to a pack with a mechanism that is child impeding and easier for an adult to use with an audible closure signal, like the \"Press & Lift\" system, has potential to reduce child access to a capsule from a pack by reducing the likelihood of the pack being left open by the adult user. Ultimately, such packs could protect children from potential poisoning injury across a range of consumer products.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    导言:对高效的未满足需求,具有最小副作用的天然衍生产品导致更新的药用植物过度流行。在2010年中期,含有大麻二酚(CBD)的产品,大麻的一种特殊代谢产物,开始受欢迎。对于消费者和医疗保健提供者来说,围绕CBD产品营销的法律背景并不完全清楚,使用某些产品的安全性令人怀疑。在线医药产品市场的公司从CBD油的混乱中获利。方法:在我们的研究中,我们采用了一种复杂的方法,称为基于风险的在线药品市场安全映射,其中包括在线商店的健康声明内容分析,测试购买,以及CBD含量的标记和定量分析。结果:发现有16家在线零售商平均销售2-7种商品和CBD油,其浓度为3%-5%(30-50mg/mL)CBD。大多数(n/N=10/16,62.5%)在其网站上间接显示了潜在的健康相关益处,如果是一家网店(n/N=1/16,6.3%),我们检测到与COVID-19相关的使用。总之,收集了30种所谓的“适应症”。2020年12月,共有12种CBD石油产品从在线零售商处进行了测试购买。在评估包装和产品信息时,我们注意到三种产品(n/N=3/12,25%)缺乏使用说明,因此增加了不适当的应用和剂量的风险。使用UHPLC定量大麻二酚含量。测得的产品的CBD浓度范围为19.58mg/mL至54.09mg/mL(平均35.51mg/mL,中位数30.63mg/mL,和SD±12.57mg/mL)。一个(8.33%)产品标签不足,5人(41.67%)被过度标记,并且根据CBD浓度的定量评估,仅每隔一个产品(50%)被适当标记。讨论:需要进一步的研究和质量控制,以建立非药用产品中CBD和其他大麻素的使用和分类的监管背景(例如,食品补充剂),世界各地的当局和政策制定者都在与CBD产品周围的不确定性作斗争。
    Introduction: The unmet need for highly effective, naturally derived products with minimal side effects results in the over-popularity of ever-newer medicinal plants. In the middle of 2010, products containing cannabidiol (CBD), one of the special metabolites of Cannabis sativa, started to gain popularity. For consumers and healthcare providers alike, the legal context surrounding the marketing of CBD products is not entirely clear, and the safety of using some products is in doubt. Companies in the online medicinal product market profit from the confusion around CBD oils. Methods: In our study, we employed a complex method known as risk-based safety mapping of the online pharmaceutical market, which included health claim content analysis of online stores, test purchases, and labeling and quantitative analysis of the CBD content. Results: There were discovered 16 online retailers selling an average of 2-7 goods and CBD oils with a concentration of 3%-5% (30-50 mg/mL) CBD. The majority (n/N = 10/16, 62.5%) displayed potential health-related benefits indirectly on their website, and in the case of one web shop (n/N = 1/16, 6.3%), we detected COVID-19-related use. Altogether, 30 types of purported \"indications\" were collected. A total of 12 CBD oil products were test-purchased from online retailers in December 2020. Upon evaluating the packaging and product information, we noticed that three products (n/N = 3/12, 25%) lacked instructions on use, hence increasing the risk of inappropriate application and dosing. The cannabidiol content was quantified using UHPLC. The measured CBD concentrations of the products ranged from 19.58 mg/mL to 54.09 mg/mL (mean 35.51 mg/mL, median 30.63 mg/mL, and SD ± 12.57 mg/mL). One (8.33%) product was underlabeled, five (41.67%) were over-labeled, and only every second product (50%) was appropriately labeled based on the quantitative assessment of CBD concentration. Discussion: Further research and quality control are necessary to establish the regulatory context of the usage and classification of CBD and other cannabinoids in nonmedicinal products (e.g., food supplements), as authorities and policymakers worldwide struggle with the uncertainties surrounding CBD products.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2015年,美国消费品安全委员会(CPSC)收到了,2017年,根据《联邦有害物质法》批准了一份请愿书,宣布某些消费品类含有非聚合物的有害物质为违禁有害物质,添加剂有机卤素阻燃剂(OFR)。请愿人要求CPSC将OFR作为具有类似健康影响的单一化学品类别进行监管。CPSC后来赞助了美国国家科学院,Engineering,和医学(NASEM)在2019年的报告中,最终确定了161个OFR,并根据化学结构相似性将其分为14个亚类。2021年,CPSC内部和外部的一组科学家进行了后续讨论,以进行当前对OFR的研究,并促进合作,以提高公众对CPSC工作的认识,并支持基于班级的方法。CPSC对OFR进行必要的风险评估。
    鉴于迄今为止收集的大量数据,有必要综合有关OFR的知识以及基于类别的法规以前是如何管理这些信息的。本评论讨论了OFR暴露和OFR毒性,填补了一些不在NASEM报告范围内的OFR暴露空白。因此,本评论的目的是概述在SOT2021上提出的OFR研究,探索与OFR风险评估相关的机遇和挑战,并告知CPSC关于基于OFR类别的方法的工作。
    基于类别的OFR调节方法可能是成功的。在评估和管理现有化学品方面,扩大使用读码和使用新方法方法(NAM)被认为是基于类别的过程的必要部分。OFR类别风险评估的建议包括需要平衡火灾和化学安全,并保护弱势群体,包括儿童和孕妇。作者还建议CPSC应该考虑全球,联邦,和国家OFR法规。缺乏数据或毒性数据缺乏一致性可能会给某些OFR亚类带来重大障碍。子类内或子类之间累积风险的可能性,OFR混合物,以及多于一种OFR常见的代谢物都增加了基于类别的风险评估的额外复杂性。本评论讨论了NASEM建议的基于班级的方法的科学和监管挑战。本评论是为进行基于班级的评估的任何人提供的资源,并为OFR利益相关者提供潜在的合作机会。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12725.
    UNASSIGNED: In 2015, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) received and then, in 2017, granted a petition under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act to declare certain groups of consumer products as banned hazardous substances if they contain nonpolymeric, additive organohalogen flame retardants (OFRs). The petitioners asked the CPSC to regulate OFRs as a single chemical class with similar health effects. The CPSC later sponsored a National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) report in 2019, which ultimately identified 161 OFRs and grouped them into 14 subclasses based on chemical structural similarity. In 2021, a follow-up discussion was held among a group of scientists from both inside and outside of the CPSC for current research on OFRs and to promote collaboration that could increase public awareness of CPSC work and support the class-based approach for the CPSC\'s required risk assessment of OFRs.
    UNASSIGNED: Given the extensive data collected to date, there is a need to synthesize what is known about OFR and how class-based regulations have previously managed this information. This commentary discusses both OFR exposure and OFR toxicity and fills some gaps for OFR exposure that were not within the scope of the NASEM report. The objective of this commentary is therefore to provide an overview of the OFR research presented at SOT 2021, explore opportunities and challenges associated with OFR risk assessment, and inform CPSC\'s work on an OFR class-based approach.
    UNASSIGNED: A class-based approach for regulating OFRs can be successful. Expanding the use of read-across and the use of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in assessing and regulating existing chemicals was considered as a necessary part of the class-based process. Recommendations for OFR class-based risk assessment include the need to balance fire and chemical safety and to protect vulnerable populations, including children and pregnant women. The authors also suggest the CPSC should consider global, federal, and state OFR regulations. The lack of data or lack of concordance in toxicity data could present significant hurdles for some OFR subclasses. The potential for cumulative risks within or between subclasses, OFR mixtures, and metabolites common to more than one OFR all add extra complexity for class-based risk assessment. This commentary discusses scientific and regulatory challenges for a class-based approach suggested by NASEM. This commentary is offered as a resource for anyone performing class-based assessments and to provide potential collaboration opportunities for OFR stakeholders. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12725.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    水解胶原蛋白,糖原,和透明质酸,通过对未充分利用的海洋生物资源进行生物技术增值而获得的,满足化妆品行业对循环经济原则下生产的可持续产品的要求。水解胶原蛋白是通过木瓜蛋白酶水解蓝鲨胶原蛋白和超滤获得的。通过超滤从工业贻贝烹饪废水中分离出糖原,降水,和选择性多糖分离。透明质酸是通过发酵产生的,净化,和解聚。主要目的是测试在化妆品制剂中包含这三种生物分子作为生物活性化合物的可行性。为此,根据重组人上皮测试方法OECD439测定三种成分的体外刺激潜力以及化妆品制剂的体外刺激潜力。此外,在成人成纤维细胞中评估了水解胶原蛋白和透明质酸组合对mRNA表达和I型胶原蛋白合成的影响。这项研究确立了,第一次,特定水解胶原蛋白和透明质酸组合作为成纤维细胞培养物中胶原蛋白I合成的刺激物的潜在用途。此外,它提供了有关这些生物分子在化妆品制剂制剂中的潜在用途的安全信息,成分和化妆品制剂,根据国际验证的参考方法,结果对皮肤没有刺激性。
    Hydrolyzed collagen, glycogen, and hyaluronic acid, obtained through the biotechnological valorization of underutilized marine bioresources, fulfill cosmetic industry requirements for sustainable products produced under circular economy principles. Hydrolyzed collagen was obtained by hydrolyzing blue shark collagen with papain and ultrafiltration. Glycogen was isolated from industrial mussel cooking wastewaters through ultrafiltration, precipitation, and selective polysaccharide separation. Hyaluronic acid was produced by fermentation, purification, and depolymerization. The main objective was to test the feasibility of including these three biomolecules in a cosmetic formulation as bioactive compounds. For this, the in vitro irritant potential of the three ingredients and also that of the cosmetic formulation was assayed according to the Reconstituted Human Epithelium Test method OECD 439. Moreover, an in vitro assessment of the effect of hydrolyzed collagen and hyaluronic acid combinations on mRNA expression and collagen type I synthesis was evaluated in adult human fibroblasts. This study establishes, for the first time, the potential use of particular hydrolyzed collagen and hyaluronic acid combinations as stimulators of collagen I synthesis in fibroblast cultures. Besides, it provide safety information regarding potential use of those biomolecules in the formulation of a cosmetic preparation positively concluding that both, ingredients and cosmetic preparation, resulted not irritant for skin following an international validated reference method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    产品损害危机对企业的销售有不利影响,声誉,和财务价值,要求危机管理者迅速采取适当的应对策略来减轻这些影响。情境危机传播理论(SCCT)指导管理者将责任归属与应对策略保持一致。本研究以2015-2021年中国上市公司产品损害危机为样本,分析了股票市场对不同应对策略的反应。事件研究法表明,被动策略在披露阶段更有效,接受+不召回和否认+召回是初始响应阶段的合规策略。此外,有危机历史的公司在制定产品损害危机的应对策略时应该承担更大的责任,随着危机历史放大负面影响。结果提供了建议,以帮助管理人员制定适当的策略。
    Product-harm crises have detrimental effects on firm\'s sales, reputation, and financial value, requiring crisis managers to promptly adopt appropriate response strategies to mitigate these impacts. Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) guides managers to align responsibility attribution with response strategies. Using Chinese listed firms\' product-harm crises sample from 2015 to 2021, this study analyzes the stock market\'s reaction to different response strategies. The event study method reveals that a passive strategy is more effective during the disclosure stage, and accept+no recall and deny+recall are conforming strategies during the initial response stage. Additionally, firms with a crisis history should assume greater responsibility when developing response strategies for product-harm crises, as crisis history amplifies negative effects. The results provide recommendations to help managers formulate appropriate strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人们担心非处方使用苯二氮卓类药物,特别是随着越来越多的检测到含有高风险新型化合物的假冒产品。这项研究的目的是调查如何以及哪些非处方苯二氮卓类药物的来源;形式,外观和包装;以及对非处方苯二氮卓类药物相关风险的认识。
    方法:从每月或更频繁地注射毒品或使用摇头丸和/或其他非法兴奋剂的澳大利亚人样本中收集数据,和报告过去6个月使用非处方苯二氮卓类药物(分别为n=235和n=250)。数据从源头上收集,从已知/可信的处方中转移,最后获得的非处方苯二氮卓类药物的产品名称和美学特征。
    结果:在注射药物的参与者中,71%的人报告说,他们最后的非处方苯二氮卓类药物是从已知/信任的处方中转移出来的。相比之下,59%的参与者使用摇头丸/其他兴奋剂。通过加密市场进行采购很少见。在这两个样本中,大多数人报告最后一次获得以地西泮或阿普唑仑出售/销售的物质。通过非转移方式采购的参与者获得阿普唑仑的可能性是后者的两倍。已知的新型化合物来源很少。在使用摇头丸/其他兴奋剂的参与者中,36%的人报告了对非处方苯二氮卓类药物含量/剂量的信心,即使来源未知。
    结论:大多数参与者获得了作为经典/注册苯二氮卓类药物出售的物质,主要是通过转移处方,有相当一部分人可能不知道假冒伪劣的流通。虽然转移使用不可否认会带来风险,澳大利亚处方的收紧可能会无意中导致国际上看到的新型苯二氮卓类药物的供应增加,加强需求和减少伤害战略的优先次序。
    There is concern around non-prescribed benzodiazepine use, particularly with increasing detections of counterfeit products containing high-risk novel compounds. The aims of this study were to investigate how and which non-prescribed benzodiazepines are being sourced; forms, appearance and packaging; and awareness of risks associated with non-prescribed benzodiazepines.
    Data were collected from a sample of Australians who inject drugs or use ecstasy and/or other illicit stimulants on a monthly or more frequent basis, and who reported past 6-month use of non-prescribed benzodiazepines (n = 235 and n = 250, respectively). Data were collected on source, diversion from a known/trusted prescription, product name and aesthetic characteristics for the last non-prescribed benzodiazepine obtained.
    Amongst participants who injected drugs, 71% reported that their last non-prescribed benzodiazepines were diverted from a known/trusted prescription, compared to 59% of participants who used ecstasy/other stimulants. Sourcing via cryptomarkets was rare. Across both samples, the majority reported last obtaining substances sold/marketed as diazepam or alprazolam. Participants sourcing via non-diverted means were twice as likely to obtain alprazolam. Known sourcing of novel compounds was rare. Amongst participants who used ecstasy/other stimulants, 36% reported confidence in the content/dose of non-prescribed benzodiazepines even when the source is unknown.
    Most participants obtained substances sold as classic/registered benzodiazepines, mostly via diverted prescriptions, with a substantial minority potentially unaware of counterfeits circulating. While diverted use undeniably presents risks, tightening of prescriptions in Australia could inadvertently lead to greater supply of novel benzodiazepines as seen internationally, reinforcing prioritisation of demand and harm reduction strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    李斯特菌病是由单核细胞增生李斯特菌(Lm)引起的食源性疾病,这代表了一个公共卫生问题。Lm已被确定为墨西哥即食肉制品(RTEM)的重要污染细菌。目的是通过定义消费者特征来探索由于香肠消费而导致的李斯特菌病的风险因素,评估Lm在香肠中的存活率(5、10和25°C持续32天)并进行定量微生物风险评估。对100名参与者的调查显示,影响消费者RTEM安全性的因素是保质期的延长。观察到获得包装的RTEM是一种安全的习惯。所有受访者都表示他们不知道李斯特菌病,但18%的人报告说感染与RTEM有关,主要是香肠。香肠支持Lm的生长,其种群随温度(25°C>10°C>5°C)和储存时间(P≤0.05)而增加。温度的升高减少了适应时间(Lag25°C=1.0h,Lag10°C=92.5h,Lag5°C=226.1h)并增加生长速率(μ25°C=4.43CFU/h,μ10°C=0.075CFU/h,香肠上的Lm的μ5°C=0.0026CFU/h)。由于香肠消费引起的李斯特菌病的风险随着温度的升高而增加:5.53×10-8-1.42×10-5(5°C),0.00616-0.111(10°C),和0.109-1.00(25°C)。RTEM卫生管理中的消费者教育以及相关病原体的信息将最大程度地减少疾病的风险。
    Listeriosis is a foodborne disease caused by Listeria monocytogenes (Lm), which represents a public health problem. Lm has been identified as an important contaminating bacterium of ready-to-eat meat products (RTEM) in Mexico. The objective was to explore the risk factors for acquiring listeriosis due to sausage consumption by defining the consumer profile, evaluating the survival of Lm in sausage (5, 10, and 25 °C for 32 days) and performing a quantitative microbiological risk assessment. The survey of 100 participants revealed that the factors compromising the safety of the RTEM by the consumer are the extension of the shelf life. Acquiring packaged RTEM was observed as a safe habit. All respondents stated that they were unaware of listeriosis, but 18% reported infections linked to RTEM, mainly sausage. The sausage supports the growth of Lm, whose population increases in congruence with temperature (25 °C > 10 °C >5 °C) and storage time (P ≤ 0.05). The increase in temperature decreases the adaptation time (Lag25 °C = 1.0 h, Lag10 °C= 92.5 h, Lag5 °C = 226.1 h) and increases the growth rate (μ25 °C = 4.43 CFU/h, μ10 °C = 0.075 CFU/h, μ5 °C = 0.0026 CFU/h) of Lm on the sausage. The risk of listeriosis due to sausage consumption increased according to the increase in temperature: 5.53 × 10-8-1.42 × 10-5 (5 °C), 0.00616-0.111 (10 °C), and 0.109-1.00 (25 °C). Consumer education in the hygienic management of RTEM and information on associated pathogens will minimize the risk of disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    描述初级保健医生需要将“cosmetovanumoveliation”纳入他们的研究生课程,以提高他们的居民对使用化妆品引起的不良反应的认识,以及促进良好的报告行为。
    Description Primary care physicians need to incorporate \"cosmetovigilance\" into their post-graduate curriculum to increase their residents\' awareness of the adverse reactions induced by the use of cosmetic products, as well as promoting good reporting behavior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号