Caregiver

护理人员
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在确定希望在韧性与抑郁关系中的中介作用。焦虑,以及癌症儿童和青少年照顾者的压力。这项横断面研究是对200名患有癌症的儿童和青少年的照顾者进行的。成人希望量表,康纳-戴维森弹性量表,和抑郁症,使用焦虑和压力(DAS)量表进行数据收集。使用SPSS宏过程(模型4和5)测试了中介和主持人模型。中介模型(模型4)表明DAS与弹性显着相关(β=-0.54,t值=-5.01,p<0.001),和希望(β=-0.84,t值=-3.45,p=0.0007)。希望介导了儿童和青少年癌症患者照顾者的韧性与DAS之间的关系(效应=-0.18,SE=0.06,95%CI-0.33至-0.06)。中介和调节模型(模型5)表明,与男性相比,女性照顾者在韧性和DAS之间具有更强的相关性(β=-0.56,t值=-3.90,p值=0.0001);希望介导了患有癌症的儿童和青少年的照顾者之间的韧性和DAS之间的关系(效应=-0.20,SE=0.08,95%CI-0.37至-0.04)。总之,希望是调解人,女性护理人员是韧性与抑郁关系的调节者,焦虑,和压力,在患有癌症的儿童和青少年的照顾者中,其推广可能是有效的。似乎有韧性,女性看护人,希望可以为抑郁症提供良好的保护,焦虑,和癌症患者护理人员的压力。
    This study aimed to determine the mediation role of hope in the relationship of resilience with depression, anxiety, and stress in caregivers of children and adolescents with cancer. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 200 caregivers of children and adolescents with cancer. Adult Hope Scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and Depression, Anxiety and Stress (DAS) scales were used for data collection. The mediator and moderator model was tested using the SPSS macro PROCESS (Model 4, and 5). The mediator model (model 4) indicated that DAS significantly correlated with resilience (β = - 0.54, t-value = - 5.01, p < 0.001), and hope (β = - 0.84, t-value = - 3.45, p = 0.0007). Hope mediated the relationship between resilience and DAS among caregivers of children and adolescents with cancer (Effect = - 0.18, SE = 0.06, 95% CI - 0.33 to - 0.06). The mediator and moderator model (model 5) showed that female caregivers had a stronger correlation between resilience and DAS when compared to their male counterparts (β = - 0.56, t-value = - 3.90, p-value = 0.0001); also, hope mediated the relationship between resilience and DAS among caregivers of children and adolescents with cancer (Effect = - 0.20, SE = 0.08, 95% CI - 0.37 to - 0.04). In conclusion, hope was a mediator, and female caregivers were a moderator in the relationship of resilience with depression, anxiety, and stress, and its promotion might be effective among caregivers of children and adolescents with cancer. It seems that resilience, female caregivers, and hope may provide good protection against depression, anxiety, and stress in caregivers of cancer patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    介绍压疮,也被称为褥疮,对卧床不起的人来说是一个重要的问题,提出了物质和社会经济挑战。诸如长期不动等因素,慢性疾病,营养不良有助于它们的发育。尽管在一些地区进行了广泛的研究,比较糖尿病和非糖尿病人群的研究仍然有限,特别是在低收入环境中。本研究旨在探讨卧床患者发生压疮的危险因素和发生频率。在理解和指导有针对性的干预措施方面解决这一差距。材料和方法对白沙瓦的四家公立医院进行了横断面研究,巴基斯坦。共纳入388名卧床不起的压疮患者,并通过问卷调查收集数据。问卷涵盖了人口统计,合并症,卧床状态的持续时间,BMI,和护理人员对压疮护理的认识。使用SPSS22.0版进行数据分析(Armonk,纽约:IBM公司),定性数据以频率和百分比表示,定量数据以平均值和标准偏差表示。卡方检验用于显著性,p<0.05被认为是显著的。结果对388例患者进行了分析,230例(59.3%)为糖尿病患者,强调压疮病例中糖尿病的患病率。大多数患有溃疡的糖尿病患者年龄在41岁以上,293例(75.5%)有合并症。手术干预是213例(54.8%)溃疡的主要原因,其次是中风77例(19.8%)。值得注意的是,252(65%)的护理人员表现出关于溃疡护理的知识不足。II期溃疡在糖尿病和非糖尿病队列中均普遍存在。结论压疮是在卧床不起的个体中观察到的不良并发症,强调迫切需要全面的预防措施和护理人员教育,以减轻压疮的负担,尤其是糖尿病患者。诸如长期不动等因素,手术干预,护理者知识不足导致压疮的发展。了解这些复杂性对于实施有效的护理方法和减轻压疮的影响至关重要。
    Introduction Pressure ulcers, also known as bedsores, are a significant concern for bedridden individuals, presenting both physical and socioeconomic challenges. Factors such as prolonged immobility, chronic medical conditions, and poor nutrition contribute to their development. Despite extensive research in some regions, studies comparing diabetic and non-diabetic populations remain limited, particularly in low-income settings. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and frequency of pressure ulcers among bedridden patients, addressing this gap in understanding and guiding targeted interventions. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted across four government hospitals in Peshawar, Pakistan. A total of 388 bedridden patients with pressure ulcers were included, and data were collected through a questionnaire. The questionnaire covered demographics, comorbidities, duration of bedbound status, BMI, and caregivers\' awareness of pressure ulcer care. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.), with qualitative data presented as frequencies and percentages and quantitative data as mean and standard deviation. Chi-square tests were utilized for significance, with p<0.05 considered significant. Results Of the 388 patients analyzed, 230 (59.3%) were diabetic, highlighting the prevalence of diabetes among pressure ulcer cases. The majority of diabetic patients with ulcers were over 41 years old, and 293 (75.5%) had comorbidities. Surgical intervention was the primary cause of ulcers in 213 (54.8%) cases, followed by stroke in 77 (19.8%) cases. Notably, 252 (65%) of caregivers exhibited inadequate knowledge regarding ulcer care. Stage II ulcers were prevalent in both diabetic and non-diabetic cohorts. Conclusions Pressure ulcers are poorly controlled complications observed in bedridden individuals, highlighting a critical need for comprehensive preventive measures and caregiver education to alleviate the burden of pressure ulcers, especially in diabetic patients. Factors such as prolonged immobility, surgical interventions, and insufficient caregiver knowledge contribute to the development of pressure ulcers. Understanding these complexities is essential for implementing effective care approaches and mitigating the impact of pressure ulcers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    招募家庭照顾者的挑战存在,并且在混乱的医疗保健环境中必须征得同意时,这种挑战会加剧。比如从医院到家庭的过渡。在我们的随机对照试验期间,COVID-19大流行的发作为探索和检查招募护理人员的不同同意程序提供了一个自然实验的机会。本出版物的目的是描述不同的招聘过程(当面与虚拟),并在接受护理者住院的情况下比较招聘率的多样性。我们发现,当面与虚拟家庭护理人员的招聘率分别为28%和23%,分别(p=0.01)。不同群体之间存在差异,招募的家庭护理人员实际上更有可能更年轻,白色,有比高中更高的教育,并且不是被照顾者的配偶或重要的其他人,比如一个孩子。仍然需要今后的工作来确定家庭护理人员招聘的方式和时间,以最大限度地提高费率并提高人口的代表性,以实现公平影响。
    Challenges to recruitment of family caregivers exist and are amplified when consent must occur in the context of chaotic healthcare circumstances, such as the transition from hospital to home. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic during our randomized controlled trial provided an opportunity for a natural experiment exploring and examining different consent processes for caregiver recruitment. The purpose of this publication is to describe different recruitment processes (in-person versus virtual) and compare diversity in recruitment rates in the context of a care recipient\'s hospitalization. We found rates of family caregiver recruitment for in-person versus virtual were 28% and 23%, respectively (p = 0.01). Differences existed across groups with family caregivers recruited virtually being more likely to be younger, white, have greater than high school education, and not be a spouse or significant other to the care recipient, such as a child. Future work is still needed to identify the modality and timing of family caregiver recruitment to maximize rates and enhance the representativeness of the population for equitable impact.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:家庭照顾者(FC)在患有慢性病的老年人中遇到各种健康问题,需要一定水平的健康知识才能获得,理解,评估和应用卫生信息和服务。这项研究旨在开发和验证用于测量患有慢性病的老年人FC中的健康素养的量表。
    方法:首先采用概念图来开发FC健康素养的概念模型。比例域来自概念模型,使用演绎和归纳法进行项目生成。定量方法,包括合并比例维度和项目,专家评审,认知访谈,和项目减少分析,被用来细化尺度。采用验证性因素分析验证量表的结构。并发有效性,内部一致性,还检查了测试-重测可靠性。
    结果:开发了一个20维概念模型,并为该量表生成了60个项目。专家审查(内容效度指数>0.85)和对FCs的认知访谈证实了大多数生成量表项目的相关性和清晰度。对451例慢性病老年人FC的验证性因子分析支持5因素结构(症状管理,日常个人护理和家务,护理协调,与受护理者的沟通和关系,和护理人员的自我护理)有42个最终量表项目,包括四个级别的健康素养技能(访问,理解,评估和应用健康信息)。与欧洲健康素养问卷(HLS-EU-Q47)的并发有效性令人满意(r=0.67,p<0.01)。量表的Cronbach'sα系数为0.96,子量表范围为0.84至0.91。两周重测信度为0.77(p<0.01)。
    结论:这项研究开发了一个概念模型,解释了患有慢性病的老年人FC中健康素养的概念和因素,这可以为未来研究开发相关的循证干预措施奠定基础。在这项研究中,开发了一种具有令人满意的心理测量特性的新的健康素养量表-家庭照顾者(HLS-FC),可用于识别健康素养不足的护理人员,并促进医疗保健专业人员的及时干预。
    BACKGROUND: Family caregivers (FCs) encounter a variety of health problems in older people with chronic illness, necessitating a certain level of health literacy to access, understand, appraise and apply health information and services. This study aimed to develop and validate a scale for measuring health literacy among FCs of older people with chronic illness.
    METHODS: Concept mapping was first employed to develop a conceptual model of health literacy of FCs. Scale domains were derived from the conceptual model, and item generation was performed using deductive and inductive methods. Quantitative methods, including merging scale dimensions and items, expert reviews, cognitive interviews, and item reduction analysis, were used to refine the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to validate the scale\'s structure. Concurrent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were also examined.
    RESULTS: A 20-dimension conceptual model was developed, and 60 items were generated for the scale. Expert review (content validity index > 0.85) and cognitive interview with FCs confirmed the relevance and clarity of the majority of the generated scale items. Confirmatory factor analysis with 451 FCs of older people with chronic illness supported a 5-factor structure (symptom management, daily personal care and household tasks, care coordination, communication and relationship with the care recipient, and self-care of caregivers) with 42 finalized scale items, including four levels of health literacy skills (accessing, understanding, appraising and applying health information). Concurrent validity with the European Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) was satisfactory (r = 0.67, p < 0.01). The Cronbach\'s α coefficient of the scale was 0.96, with subscales ranging from 0.84 to 0.91. The two-week test-retest reliability was 0.77 (p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study developed a conceptual model explaining the concept and factors of health literacy among FCs of older people with chronic illness that could provide the groundwork for future studies in developing relevant evidence-based interventions. A new Health Literacy Scale-Family Caregiver (HLS-FC) with satisfactory psychometric properties was developed in this study, which can be utilized to identify caregivers with insufficient health literacy and facilitate timely interventions by healthcare professionals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疫苗接种有助于降低患有主要神经认知障碍(MND)的老年人2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染的风险。然而,一些护理人员不愿让他们的老年家庭成员接种COVID-19疫苗。这项研究探讨了影响护理人员为老年家庭成员接种抗COVID-19MND疫苗的意愿的因素。共有232名患有MND的老年家庭成员的护理人员参加了这项研究。在这次调查中,有关COVID-19疫苗接种接受的数据,恐惧,副作用,家庭成员对疫苗接种的态度,心理健康状况,神经精神症状,并从患有MND的老年参与者中收集认知障碍。使用多变量线性回归分析模型检查了这些变量与护理人员为其老年家庭成员接种针对COVID-19的MND疫苗的意图之间的关联。结果显示,护理人员对疫苗接种的家庭支持,疫苗接种的感知价值,为老年家庭成员接种疫苗的自主权与护理人员为老年家庭成员接种MND的意愿呈正相关,而老年家庭成员的年龄与照顾者意愿呈负相关。这项研究表明,照顾者因素(感知的家庭支持,疫苗接种的价值,和自主性)和老年家庭成员的年龄与照顾者意愿相关。在制定干预措施时,应考虑这些因素,以增强护理人员为其老年家庭成员接种抗COVID-19MND疫苗的意图。
    Vaccination helps reduce the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in elderly individuals with major neurocognitive disorders (MNDs). However, some caregivers are hesitant to have their elderly family members with MNDs vaccinated against COVID-19. This study explored the factors influencing caregivers\' intentions to vaccinate elderly family members with MNDs against COVID-19. A total of 232 caregivers of elderly family members with MNDs participated in this study. In this survey, data regarding COVID-19 vaccination acceptance, fear, side effects, family members\' attitudes toward vaccination, mental health status, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and cognitive impairments were collected from the elderly participants with MNDs. The associations between these variables and the caregivers\' intention to vaccinate their elderly family members with MNDs against COVID-19 were examined using a multivariable linear regression analysis model. The results revealed that caregivers\' perceived familial support for vaccination, the perceived value of vaccination, and autonomy to vaccinate elder family members were positively correlated with caregivers\' intention to vaccinate elderly family members with MNDs, whereas elderly family members\' age was negatively correlated with caregiver intentions. This study demonstrated that caregiver factors (perceived familial support, value of vaccination, and autonomy) and elderly family members\' age were correlated with caregiver intention. These factors should be considered in developing interventions to enhance caregivers\' intentions to vaccinate their elderly family members with MNDs against COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有不同类型痴呆症的人可能有不同的症状和经历,影响他们的生活质量。这项研究调查了生活质量是否因痴呆症类型和时间而异。
    方法:参与者是IDEAL纵向队列研究的1555名轻度至中度痴呆患者和1327名护理人员,从临床服务招募。尽可能多的人被跟踪长达6年。诊断包括阿尔茨海默病,血管性痴呆,阿尔茨海默氏症和血管性痴呆混合症,帕金森病痴呆,路易体痴呆症,和额颞叶痴呆.使用阿尔茨海默病生活质量量表的自我和信息评估版本。关节模型,结合具有随机效应的混合效应模型和考虑辍学的生存模型,用于检查诊断时的生活质量是否因痴呆类型而异,以及轨迹如何随时间变化。
    结果:痴呆类型和生活质量之间最强的关联出现在诊断前后。对于自我评级和线人评级,帕金森病痴呆或路易体痴呆患者的生活质量评分较低.随着时间的推移,所有痴呆症类型的自我评估得分几乎没有变化(每年-0.15分)。告密者评分随着时间的推移而下降(-每年1.63分),线人对路易体痴呆症患者的评分下降幅度最大(每年-2.18分)。
    结论:自我评估的生活质量评分随着时间的推移相对稳定,而线人的评分则显示出急剧下降。帕金森病痴呆或路易体痴呆患者的生活质量特别低,表明更加关注这些群体的需求的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: People with different types of dementia may have distinct symptoms and experiences that affect their quality of life. This study investigated whether quality of life varied across types of dementia and over time.
    METHODS: The participants were 1555 people with mild-to-moderate dementia and 1327 carers from the IDEAL longitudinal cohort study, recruited from clinical services. As many as possible were followed for up to 6 years. Diagnoses included were Alzheimer\'s disease, vascular dementia, mixed Alzheimer\'s and vascular dementia, Parkinson\'s disease dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, and frontotemporal dementia. Self- and informant-rated versions of the Quality of Life in Alzheimer\'s Disease scale were used. A joint model, incorporating a mixed effects model with random effects and a survival model to account for dropout, was used to examine whether quality of life varied by dementia type at the time of diagnosis and how trajectories changed over time.
    RESULTS: The strongest associations between dementia type and quality of life were seen around the time of diagnosis. For both self-ratings and informant ratings, people with Parkinson\'s disease dementia or dementia with Lewy bodies had lower quality of life scores. Over time there was little change in self-rated scores across all dementia types (- 0.15 points per year). Informant-rated scores declined over time (- 1.63 points per year), with the greatest decline seen in ratings by informants for people with dementia with Lewy bodies (- 2.18 points per year).
    CONCLUSIONS: Self-rated quality of life scores were relatively stable over time whilst informant ratings showed a steeper decline. People with Parkinson\'s disease dementia or dementia with Lewy bodies report particularly low levels of quality of life, indicating the importance of greater attention to the needs of these groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项调查研究调查了医疗专业人员以外的来源类型(例如,社交媒体),患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童的看护人用于获取有关ADHD的知识,并调查了此类信息来源的使用与台湾看护人父母的压力和焦虑之间的关联。
    方法:共有213名ADHD患儿的照顾者参与了这项研究。调查了护理人员用来获取医疗专业人员以外的ADHD知识的来源。使用育儿压力指数评估照顾者的育儿压力,使用贝克焦虑量表评估护理人员的焦虑。使用多元线性回归分析研究了所使用的来源类型和来源使用总数与照顾者育儿压力和焦虑的关系。
    结果:除医学专业人员外,最常见的知识来源是教师(55.4%),其次是社交媒体(52.6%),传统媒体(50.7%),朋友(33.8%),其他儿童的照顾者(21.1%),和家庭成员(18.3%)。护理人员使用除医学专业人员外的ADHD知识来源的平均总数为2.32。从社交媒体获得有关ADHD的知识与照顾者的育儿压力显着相关。此外,从其他儿童的照顾者那里获得关于多动症的知识与照顾者育儿压力和焦虑显着相关,使用医学专业人员以外的ADHD知识来源的频率也是如此。
    结论:患有ADHD的儿童的照顾者从多个来源获得关于ADHD的知识。从社交媒体获得有关ADHD的知识与照顾者的育儿压力显着相关。关于ADHD的知识来源的数量与照顾者父母的压力和焦虑显着相关。
    BACKGROUND: This survey study investigated the types of sources other than medical professionals (e.g., social media) that the caregivers of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) use to acquire knowledge about ADHD and investigated the association between the use of such information sources and caregiver parenting stress and anxiety in Taiwan.
    METHODS: A total of 213 caregivers of children with ADHD participated in this study. The sources that the caregivers used to acquire knowledge about ADHD other than medical professionals were investigated. Caregiver parenting stress was assessed using the Parenting Stress Index, and caregiver anxiety was assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory. The associations of the types of sources used and total number of source use with caregiver parenting stress and anxiety were investigated using multivariate linear regression analysis.
    RESULTS: The most common source of knowledge other than medical professionals was teachers (55.4%), followed by social media (52.6%), traditional media (50.7%), friends (33.8%), caregivers of other children (21.1%), and family members (18.3%). The caregivers\' mean total number of using sources of knowledge about ADHD other than medical professionals was 2.32. Acquiring knowledge about ADHD from social media was significantly associated with caregiver parenting stress. Additionally, acquiring knowledge about ADHD from caregivers of other children was significantly associated with caregiver parenting stress and anxiety, as was the frequency of using sources of knowledge about ADHD other than medical professionals.
    CONCLUSIONS: The caregivers of children with ADHD acquired knowledge about ADHD from multiple sources. Acquiring knowledge about ADHD from social media was significantly associated with caregiver parenting stress. The number of sources of knowledge about ADHD was significantly associated with caregiver parenting stress and anxiety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了研究现有文献关于概念化的范围,使用,以及与同情相关的结果,在照顾有童年发病残疾的青年方面。
    基于JoannaBriggsInstitute(JBI)范围审查方法开发了一种协议。MEDLINE,EMBASE,PsycINFO,Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,和EBSCOhostCINAHL,被搜查了。
    选择了8项研究纳入;4项使用了定量方法,四个使用了定性方法。在任何纳入的研究中,同情都没有被定义为先验或后验。在三项先验研究中,仅明确定义了自我同情的概念。报告最多的结果指标是患有儿童期残疾的青年父母的自我同情。父母的自我同情与更高的生活质量和弹性以及更低的压力有关,抑郁症,羞耻和内疚。
    关于概念化的证据有限,使用,以及与童年发病残疾青年的同情心相关的结果。自我同情可能是儿童期残疾青年父母的有效内部应对过程。需要进一步的研究,以了解同情儿童残疾青年的含义,他们的父母和照顾者。
    https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF。IO/2GRB4。
    UNASSIGNED: To examine the scope of existing literature on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion in the care of youth with childhood-onset disabilities.
    UNASSIGNED: A protocol was developed based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review method. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EBSCOhost CINAHL, were searched.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight studies were selected for inclusion; four used quantitative methodology, and four used qualitative methods. Compassion was not defined a priori or a posteriori in any of the included studies. The concept of self-compassion was explicitly defined only for parents of youth with childhood-onset disabilities in three studies a priori. The most reported outcome measure was self-compassion in parents of youth with childhood-onset disabilities. Self-compassion among parents was associated with greater quality of life and resiliency and lower stress, depression, shame and guilt.
    UNASSIGNED: There is limited evidence on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion among youth with childhood-onset disabilities. Self-compassion may be an effective internal coping process among parents of youth with childhood-onset disabilities. Further research is required to understand the meaning of compassion to youth with childhood-onset disabilities, their parents and caregivers.
    UNASSIGNED: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2GRB4.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:世界人口的长寿可能导致住院人数增加,因此,功能限制的出现,导致需要家庭照顾者。住院的老年人可能会变得依赖,需要更多的护理,增加家庭照顾者的负担。因此,医院环境中的护理团队面临着新的局面:占用医院病床的老年人数量增加,以及他们的家庭护理人员的存在。
    目的:我们旨在分析感兴趣的人口统计学变量与家庭护理人员自评健康状况之间的关联,并描述在亚马逊地区一所大学医院住院的老年人的功能。
    方法:这个横截面,定量,探索性,描述性研究是通过对98名受访者的个人访谈进行的,2023年2月至3月期间,在巴西一家大学医院的外科诊所部门住院的49名家庭护理人员和49名老年人。从家庭照顾者那里收集了人口数据和健康状况,并描述住院老年人的功能,应用了Barthel指数。使用描述性(频率和百分比)和推理分析,并应用学生t检验。采用5%的显著性水平。
    结果:在49名家庭照顾者中,大多数为女性(n=40,81.6%),平均年龄为46.9(SD13.3)岁.大多数是单身(n=28,57.1%),并且完成了平均教育水平(n=26,53.1%)。此外,25(51%)的照顾者正在照顾他们的父母。关于健康状况,受访者自我评估他们的健康状况良好(25/49,51%;P=0.01),他们认为他们的健康状况不受提供护理的影响(36/49,73.5%;P=.01)。人口统计学变量之间存在显著关联(即,性别,年龄,和教育)和家庭护理人员的自我评估(分别为P=.01,P=.01和P=.04)。在住院的49名老年人中,大多数(n=31,63.2%)是男性,平均年龄为69.2(SD7.12)岁。关于功能评估,大多数老年人被归类为对护理有轻度依赖(n=23,46.9%),特别是在60至69岁之间的年龄组(21/49,67.8%)。
    结论:数据显示,女性性别,年龄,家庭护理人员的教育有助于为功能依赖程度较低的住院老年人提供护理。重要的是要强调,在老年人住院期间,家庭照顾者不应被视为责任的下放或人力资源的补充,以协助他们的康复。卫生专业人员需要实施果断的干预措施,以便家庭护理人员充当治疗资源。
    BACKGROUND: The longevity of the world population can contribute to an increase in hospitalizations and, consequently, to the emergence of functional limitations, resulting in the need for family caregivers. Hospitalized older adults may become dependent and require more care, increasing the burden on family caregivers. Thus, the nursing team in the hospital environment faces a new situation: an increase in the number of older adults occupying hospital beds and the presence of their family caregivers.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyze the association between the demographic variables of interest and the self-rated health of family caregivers and to describe the functionality of older adults hospitalized in a university hospital in the Amazonian context.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional, quantitative, exploratory, and descriptive study was carried out through individual interviews with 98 interviewees, divided into 49 family caregivers and 49 older adults hospitalized in the surgical clinic sector of a university hospital in Brazil between February and March 2023. Demographic data and health conditions were collected from family caregivers, and to describe the functionality of hospitalized older adults, the Barthel Index was applied. Descriptive (frequency and percentage) and inferential analyses were used, and the student t test was applied. The significance level of 5% was adopted.
    RESULTS: Among the 49 family caregivers, the majority were women (n=40, 81.6%) with an average age of 46.9 (SD 13.3) years. Most were single (n=28, 57.1%) and had completed an average level of education (n=26, 53.1%). Additionally, 25 (51%) caregivers were caring for their parents. Regarding health conditions, respondents self-assessed their health as good (25/49, 51%; P=.01), and they considered that their health status was not affected by the provision of care (36/49, 73.5%; P=.01). There was a significant association between demographic variables (ie, gender, age, and education) and self-assessment of family caregivers (P=.01, P=.01, and P=.04, respectively). Of the 49 older adults hospitalized, the majority (n=31, 63.2%) were men, with a mean age of 69.2 (SD 7.12) years. Regarding the assessment of functionality, most older adults were classified as having mild dependence on care (n=23, 46.9%), specifically in the age group between 60 and 69 years (21/49, 67.8%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The data revealed that female gender, age, and education of family caregivers contributed favorably to the provision of care to hospitalized older adults with a lower degree of functional dependence. It is important to emphasize that during the older adult\'s hospitalization, the family caregiver should not be seen as a delegation of responsibilities or as a complement of human resources to assist in their recovery. Health professionals need to implement assertive interventions so that the family caregiver functions as a therapeutic resource.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癌症患者,或来自女同性恋的照顾者,同性恋,双性恋,变性人,酷儿,双性或无性(LGBTQIA+)社区体验独特的信息和支持需求。需要提供定制支持的无障碍技术资源,以促进福祉,然而,这是一个越来越多的研究领域,需要进一步调查。这项研究的目的是探索癌症患者的医疗保健服务经验,和他们的照顾者,属于性或性别多样化社区(LGBTQIA+)的人,并确定智能手机应用程序(应用程序)如何支持来自LGBTQIA+社区的人们。
    方法:这是一项定性的描述性研究,来自LGBTQIA+社区的癌症患者或照顾者参与了电话访谈。参与者是通过社交媒体广告在澳大利亚招募的,LGBTQIA+医疗实践,和癌症倡导团体。参与者被问及他们的经历,并提供了现有应用程序的屏幕截图,并要求提供有关内容和包容性的反馈。成绩单被编码,代码被分组在一起形成相似的概念。使用归纳和演绎分析来创建主题。
    结果:13例患者(平均年龄56(SD:13)),三名看护者(平均年龄64岁(SD:19))完成了电话采访。大多数参与者确定自己的性别为女性(患者n=9,护理人员3),以及他们作为同性恋或女同性恋的性取向(患者n=10,看护者n=3)。创建了四个主题:(1)导航医疗保健领域的披露,描述了围绕披露的情绪挑战;(2)与临床医生的积极经验的力量,描述了临床医生在护理方面的积极互动和差距;(3)性别和性对非正式支持的影响,概述了从非正式网络获得的支持和支持方面的差距,(4)增加智能手机应用程序包容性的机会,产生了关于如何定制应用程序以满足确定的需求的想法。
    结论:披露性别或性行为,与临床医生的互动有可能影响参与者的癌症治疗经验。非正式网络的差距指向如何更好地支持LGBTQIA+社区,并确定了将为该社区量身定制和试用的应用程序中包含的机会。未来的工作应侧重于解决承认和支持受癌症影响的优先群体的系统级过程。
    BACKGROUND: People living with cancer, or carers who are from lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex or asexual (LGBTQIA+) communities experience unique information and support needs. Accessible technology-based resources providing tailored support are required to promote wellbeing, however this is a growing area of research requiring further investigation. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of healthcare services among people living with cancer, and their carers, who belong to sexual or gender diverse communities (LGBTQIA+), and identify how smartphone applications (apps) could support people from LGBTQIA + communities.
    METHODS: This was a qualitative descriptive study where people living with cancer or carers from LGBTQIA + communities participated in phone interviews. Participants were recruited across Australia via social media advertisements, LGBTQIA + medical practices, and cancer advocacy groups. Participants were asked questions about their experiences, and were provided with screenshots of an existing app and asked to provide feedback on content and inclusiveness. Transcripts were coded and codes grouped together to form similar and concepts. Inductive and deductive analyses were used to create themes.
    RESULTS: 13 patients (mean age 56 (SD:13)), and three carers (mean age 64 (SD:19)) completed phone interviews. The majority of participants identified their gender as female (patients n = 9, carers 3), and their sexuality as gay or lesbian (patients n = 10, carers n = 3). Four themes were created: (1) navigating disclosure in healthcare, described emotional challenges surrounding disclosure; (2) the power of positive experiences with clinicians, described positive interactions and gaps in care from clinicians; (3) impact of gender and sexuality on informal support, outlined support received from informal network and gaps in support, and; (4) opportunities to increase inclusivity in smartphone apps, generated ideas on how apps can be tailored to meet needs identified.
    CONCLUSIONS: Disclosure of gender or sexuality, and interactions with clinicians had the potential to impact participants\' experience of cancer care. Gaps in informal networks pointed at how to better support LGBTQIA + communities, and identified opportunities for inclusion in an app that will be tailored and trialled for this community. Future work should focus on addressing systems-level processes in acknowledging and supporting priority groups affected by cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号