rheumatologists

风湿病学家
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究探讨了中国患者和风湿病学家对干燥综合征(SS)的中医态度和看法的异同。包括分析影响他们决策的因素。
    方法:使用匿名问卷对北京三个三级医疗中心的SS患者和中国多家医院的风湿病临床医生进行了多中心调查。结果采用描述性统计分析。
    结果:来自中国31个省市的患者942份有效问卷,男女比例约为1:14,平均年龄为48.81岁,和7(4,10)年的中位病程。有320份来自风湿病学家的有效问卷,覆盖中国30个省市,男女比例约为0.87:1,平均年龄为48岁,工作时间中位数为10.5(6,15)年。风湿病学家每月平均治疗15(11,50)例SS,SS占所有风湿性疾病的比例中位数为6.66%(6-10%)。许多患者认为中医可以治本,最受期待的中医疗法是中医专利处方和药茶。相反,风湿病学家高度重视中医的功效,和最常用的中草药汤。大多数医患群体对中医治疗持积极态度,以低副作用为主要优势。回归分析显示,40岁以上患者病程>4年,使用中医的概率增加了1-6倍;工作超过15年的医生在临床工作中推荐中医的概率,中医和中西医结合治疗增加了1-2倍。
    结论:中医已被广泛接受并受到医患群体的关注,尤其是老年患者和有经验的风湿病专家。然而,负面偏见和缺乏关于中医治疗和SS本身的准确信息需要改进。中药剂型与疗效之间的矛盾是一大难题,和患者对方便有效的中药专利制剂的需求表明,未来的工作应集中在开发具有明确组成和机制的中药专利制剂上。
    BACKGROUND: This study explored similarities and differences among Chinese patients and rheumatologists in their attitudes towards and perceptions of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for Sjögren\'s syndrome (SS), including analyzing factors that influenced their decision making.
    METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was used to conduct a multicenter survey among patients with SS at three tertiary care medical centers in Beijing and among rheumatology clinicians at several hospitals across China. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
    RESULTS: There were 942 valid questionnaires from patients from 31 provinces and cities in China, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 1:14, a mean age of 48.81 years, and a median disease duration of 7 (4, 10) years. There were 320 valid questionnaires from rheumatologists, covering 30 provinces and cities in China, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 0.87:1, a mean age of 48 years, and a median work duration of 10.5 (6, 15) years. The rheumatologists treated a median of 15 (11, 50) SS cases per month, and the median proportion of SS to all rheumatic diseases was 6.66% (6-10%). Many patients believed TCM could cure the root of the disease, and the most expected TCM therapies were TCM patent prescriptions and medicinal teas. Conversely, rheumatologists placed high value on the efficacy of TCM, and most commonly prescribed Chinese herbal decoctions. Most doctor-patient groups were positive about TCM treatment, citing the low side effects as the major advantage. Regression analysis showed that for patients over 40 years old with a course of disease > 4 years, the probability of using TCM has increased by 1-6 times; the probability of recommending TCM in clinical work of doctors who have worked for more than 15 years, TCM and integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine has increased 1-2 times.
    CONCLUSIONS: TCM has become widely accepted and earned attention from doctor-patient groups, especially among older patients and experienced rheumatologists. However, negative prejudices and absence of accurate information about TCM treatments and SS itself require improvement. The contradiction between TCM dosage form and efficacy is a major problem, and patient demand for convenient and efficient TCM patent preparations suggests future work should focus on developing TCM patent preparations with clear compositions and mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨单独的实验室项目在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)分类中的表现。
    方法:我们的队列包括352和385(对照)患有和不患有SLE的患者。这项研究评估了美国风湿病学会(ACR)-1997,系统性狼疮国际合作诊所(SLICC)-2012,欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)/ACR-2019和系统性红斑狼疮风险概率指数(SLERPI)仅使用实验室项目,包括血液和尿液检查结果.
    结果:实验室项目/总项目的中位数为66.7%,75.0%,60.4%,在ACR-1997、SLICC-2012、EULAR/ACR-2019和SLERPI中占77.4%,分别。在单独包括实验室项目之后,ACR-1997,SLICC-2012,EULAR/ACR-2019和SLERPI的敏感性为31.3%(95%置信区间[CI]:26.4%-36.4%),79.8%(95%CI:75.3%-83.9%),75.9%(95%CI:71.0%-80.2%),和85.2%(95%CI:81.1%-88.8%),分别。我们引用了SLERPI并删除了额外的限制,即,SLICC-2012标准只需要满足至少四个项目(mSLICC-2012)和EULAR/ACR-2019标准需要≥10分(mEULAR/ACR-2019)才有资格获得SLE分类。mSLICC-2012和mEULAR/ACR-2019标准,包括单独的实验室项目,新发现的13和25名患者,分别。仅基于实验室项目,mSLICC-2012,mEULAR/ACR-2019和SLERPI的联合检测发现348例患者的敏感性改善为90.6%(95%CI:87.1%-93.5%).患者,他们是根据mEULAR/ACR-2019标准分类的,都符合其他标准。
    结论:单独纳入实验室项目在临床上是可行的,有助于鉴别SLE。SLERPI和SLICC-2012,仅使用实验室项目,与EULAR/ACR-2019相比,更值得在临床推广。要点•实验室项目在SLE分类标准中起着至关重要的作用,仅纳入实验室项目在临床上是可行的,以帮助鉴定SLE。•SLERPI和SLICC-2012,仅使用实验室项目,与EULAR/ACR-2019相比,在临床上更值得推广,两者联合使用可进一步提高敏感性。•评估实验室指标的相对简单性可以帮助非风湿病学家和缺乏经验的风湿病学家更快地识别SLE,从而降低患者延迟诊断的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the performance of laboratory items alone in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification.
    METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 352 and 385 (control) patients with and without SLE. This study evaluated the performance of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-1997, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)-2012, European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR-2019, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Risk Probability Index (SLERPI) using laboratory items alone, including blood and urine test results.
    RESULTS: The median ratio of laboratory items/total items was 66.7%, 75.0%, 60.4%, and 77.4% in ACR-1997, SLICC-2012, EULAR/ACR-2019, and SLERPI, respectively. After including laboratory items alone, the sensitivity of ACR-1997, SLICC-2012, EULAR/ACR-2019, and SLERPI was 31.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.4%-36.4%), 79.8% (95% CI: 75.3%-83.9%), 75.9% (95% CI: 71.0%-80.2%), and 85.2% (95% CI: 81.1%-88.8%), respectively. We referenced the SLERPI and removed the additional restrictions, i.e., SLICC-2012 criteria only needs to fulfill at least four items (mSLICC-2012) and EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria needs to have ≥ 10 points (mEULAR/ACR-2019) to qualify for SLE classification. The mSLICC-2012 and mEULAR/ACR-2019 criteria, including laboratory items alone, newly identified 13 and 25 patients, respectively. Based on laboratory items alone, the combination of mSLICC-2012, mEULAR/ACR-2019, and SLERPI identified 348 patients with an improved sensitivity of 90.6% (95% CI: 87.1%-93.5%). Patients, who were classified according to the mEULAR/ACR-2019 criteria, all met the other criteria.
    CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating laboratory items alone was clinically feasible to help identify SLE. SLERPI and SLICC-2012, using laboratory items alone, were more worthwhile to promote in the clinic compared with EULAR/ACR-2019. Key Points • Laboratory items play a crucial role in the SLE classification criteria, and incorporating laboratory items alone was clinically feasible to help in the identification of SLE. • The SLERPI and SLICC-2012, using laboratory items alone, were more worthwhile to promote in the clinic compared with EULAR/ACR-2019, and the combination of the two could further improve the sensitivity. • The relative simplicity of evaluating laboratory indices may help nonrheumatologists and inexperienced rheumatologists to identify SLE more quickly, thereby reducing the risk of delayed diagnosis in patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    欧洲抗风湿病联盟关于类风湿关节炎管理的建议建议临床护士参与类风湿关节炎的管理。然而,欧洲抗风湿病联盟的建议很难适用于中国机构。在中国,风湿病护理服务没有被广泛采用,因为风湿病护理服务的可行性和质量尚未在中国人群中得到中国当局的确认。该研究的目的是比较接受护士支持护理的类风湿关节炎患者(6个月病史)的2.5年临床结果,其中疾病活动评分28关节计数与C反应蛋白(DAS28-CRP)>5.1与接受风湿病学家主导护理的患者。患者接受30分钟/天和6次/周护士支持的护理(NC队列,n=127)或患者每3个月接受20分钟的常规门诊风湿病学家主导的护理(n=131)。这两种类型的护理都涉及患者的病史,注意药物治疗的效果和不良反应,患者教育,整体福祉,日常生活,咨询,澄清,和康复。此外,有一个队列,患者没有接受任何非治疗护理(NN队列,n=141)。所有患者在非治疗干预前均有明确的抑郁和焦虑情绪(医院焦虑抑郁量表中文版评分≥11分)。在有或没有非治疗干预(EL)DAS28-CRP的2.5年治疗,抑郁症,与接受任何类型的非治疗干预措施之前以及接受EL治疗的RC和NN队列患者相比,NC队列患者的焦虑评分降低(全部P<.001)。在中度疾病活动的患者中,(DAS28-CRP评分:3.2-5.1)和临界抑郁和焦虑(医院焦虑和抑郁量表中文版评分:8-10)在NC队列中高于RC和NN队列(P<.001所有)。NC队列患者的门诊护理满意度得分高于RC队列[23(27-17)vs17(21-14)]和NN[23(7-17)vs15[18-12]](两者均P<0.001)。DAS28-CRP>5.1的类风湿性关节炎患者的生理和心理状况需要改善。在具有高疾病活动性的类风湿性关节炎患者中,护士支持的护理优于风湿病学家主导的护理(证据水平:IV;技术功效:第5阶段)。
    The European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis advised the involvement of clinical nurses for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. However, The European League Against Rheumatism recommendations are difficult to apply to Chinese institutes. In China, the rheumatology nursing service is not widely adopted because the feasibility and quality of rheumatology nursing service have not been confirmed in the Chinese population by the Chinese authorities. The objectives of the study were to compare 2.5 years clinical outcomes of patients of rheumatoid arthritis (6 months history) with disease activity score 28-joint count with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) > 5.1 who received nurse-supported care against those of patients who received rheumatologist-led care. Patients received 30 minutes/day and 6 times/week nurse-supported care (NC cohort, n = 127) or Patients had received 20 minutes session at every 3 months of conventional outpatient-based rheumatologist-led care (n = 131). Both types of care have involved the history of patients, care regarding effects and adverse effects of pharmacological treatments, patients education, overall well-being, everyday life, counseling, clarifications, and rehabilitation. Additionally, there were a cohort in which patients did not receive any nontreatment care (NN cohort, n = 141). All patients have definite depression and anxiety (hospital anxiety and depression scale Chinese version score ≥ 11) before nontreatment interventions. At 2.5 years of treatments with or without nontreatment interventions (EL) DAS28-CRP, depression, and anxiety scores of patients of the NC cohort were decreased as compared to their before any type of nontreatment interventions conditions and those of patients of the RC and NN cohorts at EL (P < .001 for all). At EL numbers of patients with moderate disease activity, (DAS28-CRP score: 3.2-5.1) and borderline depression and anxiety (hospital anxiety and depression scales Chinese version score: 8-10) were greater in the NC cohort than those of the RC and NN cohorts (P < .001 for all). Outpatient care satisfaction scores of patients of the NC cohort were higher than those of the RC [23 (27-17) vs 17 (21-14)] and NN [23 (7-17) vs 15 [18-12]) cohorts (P < .001 for both). Physiological and psychological conditions of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with DAS28-CRP > 5.1 are required to improve. Nurse-supported care is superior nontreatment compared to rheumatologist-led care in rheumatoid arthritis patients with high disease activity (Level of Evidence: IV; Technical Efficacy: Stage 5).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:关于中国银屑病患者中银屑病关节炎(PsA)患病率的报道非常有限。这项研究,由风湿病学家进行,估计了大量中国银屑病患者中PsA的患病率。
    方法:招募了在五家医院的9个皮肤科诊所就诊并确诊为银屑病的连续患者。要求所有牛皮癣患者完成包含16个问题的问卷,以确定可能的PsA病例。所有对问卷有一个或多个正面回答的患者均由两名经验丰富的风湿病学家进行评估。
    结果:共有2434例银屑病患者,包括1561名男性和873名女性,已注册。问卷调查和风湿病学家的检查均在皮肤科诊所完成。结果确定了252名PsA患者,包括168名男性和84名女性。银屑病患者中PsA的总体患病率为10.4%(95%置信区间[95%CI],9.1%-11.7%)。按性别,男性患病率为10.8%(95%CI,9.2%-12.5%),女性患病率为9.6%(95%CI,7.7%-11.9%),PsA患病率无显著性别差异(P=0.38).252名PsA患者中,125(49.6%,95%CI,41.3%-59.1%)是风湿病学家新诊断的。因此,银屑病患者中未确诊PsA的患病率为5.2%(95%CI,4.4%-6.2%).
    结论:中国银屑病人群中PsA的患病率约为10.4%,这几乎是以前中国人口报告的两倍,但低于白种人。
    BACKGROUND: Reports on the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) among Chinese patients with psoriasis are very limited. This study, conducted by rheumatologists, estimated the prevalence of PsA in a large number of Chinese patients with psoriasis.
    METHODS: Consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of psoriasis attending nine dermatology clinics in five hospitals were recruited. All psoriasis patients were asked to complete a questionnaire comprising 16 questions to identify possible cases of PsA. All patients with one or more positive answers to the questionnaire were evaluated by two experienced rheumatologists.
    RESULTS: A total of 2434 psoriasis patients, including 1561 males and 873 females, were enrolled. Both the questionnaire and rheumatologists\' examinations were completed in the dermatology clinics. The results identified 252 patients with PsA, comprising 168 males and 84 females. The overall prevalence of PsA among psoriasis patients was 10.4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 9.1%-11.7%). By sex, the prevalence was 10.8% (95% CI, 9.2%-12.5%) for males and 9.6% (95% CI, 7.7%-11.9%) for females and there was no significant sex difference in the prevalence of PsA (P = 0.38). Of the 252 PsA patients, 125 (49.6%, 95% CI, 41.3%-59.1%) were newly diagnosed by rheumatologists. Consequently, the prevalence of undiagnosed PsA among psoriasis patients was 5.2% (95% CI, 4.4%-6.2%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PsA in the Chinese population with psoriasis is about 10.4%, which is almost double that of previous reports in the Chinese population, but lower than that in Caucasians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:从中国风湿病学家的角度探讨治疗对目标(T2T)的实施和治疗满意度。
    方法:使用AdelphiRealWorldDiseaseSpecificProgramme™方法,对来自中国风湿病学家及其成年RA患者的横断面数据库进行回顾性分析。多因素logistic回归模型用于评估与T2T使用相关的因素,实现T2T目标,和医生治疗满意度。
    结果:60位医生提供了600位患者的数据,其中39.0%(234/600)使用T2T治疗,64.9%(366/564)达到了T2T目标。74.3%(445/599)的患者对治疗满意。疼痛评分较高的患者更有可能使用T2T进行治疗(比值比(OR)1.25;p=0.017),但不太可能达到T2T目标(OR0.76;p=0.004)。如果患者自诊断以来的时间较长(>2vs≤2年;OR1.61;p=0.031)或接受靶向合成或生物疾病缓解抗风湿药物(tsDMARDs或bDMARDs;OR6.90;p<0.001),则更有可能使用T2T。体重指数较高(≥24vs<24kg/m2;OR2.73;p=0.001)或全职工作(OR2.11;p=0.005)的患者更有可能实现T2T目标。如果达到T2T目标(OR4.78;p<0.001)或使用tsDMARDs或bDMARDs(OR2.58;p=0.017),医师治疗满意度更高,如果疼痛评分较高,则可能性较小(OR0.79;p=0.019)。
    结论:T2T在中国的实施并不理想。我们的发现提供了对T2T实施和医生治疗满意度的洞察,支持T2T在中国RA临床实践中的使用。要点•中国目前的T2T实施并不理想。•疼痛较大的患者更有可能使用T2T进行管理,但不太可能实现其T2T目标。•医师治疗满意度与T2T目标实现相关。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the implementation of treat-to-target (T2T) and treatment satisfaction from Chinese rheumatologists\' perspectives.
    METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a cross-sectional database collected from rheumatologists and their adult patients with RA in China using Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme™ methodology. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with T2T use, achievement of T2T goals, and physician treatment satisfaction.
    RESULTS: Sixty physicians provided data for 600 patients, of whom 39.0% (234/600) were being treated using T2T, and 64.9% (366/564) had achieved their T2T goal. Physicians were satisfied with treatment in 74.3% (445/599) of patients. Patients with a higher pain score were more likely to be managed using T2T (odds ratio (OR) 1.25; p = 0.017), but less likely to have achieved the T2T goal (OR 0.76; p = 0.004). T2T use was more likely if patients had a longer time since diagnosis (> 2 vs ≤ 2 years; OR 1.61; p = 0.031) or received targeted synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs or bDMARDs; OR 6.90; p < 0.001). T2T goal achievement was more likely for patients with higher body mass index (≥ 24 vs < 24 kg/m2; OR 2.73; p = 0.001) or full-time employment (OR 2.11; p = 0.005). Physician treatment satisfaction was more likely if the T2T goal was achieved (OR 4.78; p < 0.001) or tsDMARDs or bDMARDs were used (OR 2.58; p = 0.017), and less likely if pain scores were higher (OR 0.79; p = 0.019).
    CONCLUSIONS: T2T implementation in China is suboptimal. Our findings provide insight into T2T implementation and physician treatment satisfaction, supporting T2T use in Chinese RA clinical practice. Key Points • T2T implementation in China is currently suboptimal. • Patients with greater pain were more likely to be managed using T2T but were less likely to have achieved their T2T goals. • Physician treatment satisfaction was associated with T2T goal achievement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation of the joints with high risk of disability. In recent years, remarkable progress has been made towards the diagnosis and treatment of RA, and the international RA guidelines have been also kept updated. Nevertheless, there are many challenges in China, especially inadequate number of rheumatologists and insufficient experience in the diagnosis and treatment of RA. Therefore, Chinese Rheumatology Association drafted the standardized diagnosis and treatment of RA based on the available evidence, so as to improve the management of RA patients in China.
    类风湿关节炎(RA)是一种以关节滑膜炎症为主要病理基础的自身免疫病,致残率高。近年来,RA的诊治取得了突飞猛进的发展,国际上有关RA的指南亦不断更新。我国RA患者人数多,规范化诊疗的普及依然欠缺。中华医学会风湿病学分会在借鉴国内外诊治经验和指南的基础上制定了本规范,对RA的诊断、治疗及管理给予建议,以更好地控制关节炎症,改善患者生活质量,减少残疾及疾病负担。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    High prevalence of undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and prolonged diagnostic delay are key troubles in the appropriate management of PsA. To analyze the possible causes for this phenomenon, a web-based nationwide survey was conducted to investigate rheumatologists\' perceptions on PsA diagnosis in China.
    The electronic questionnaire consisting of 38 questions were designed by an expert panel and distributed with the online survey tool Sojump, which is a professional online survey platform. The completed questionnaires by real-name rheumatologists were collected.
    A total of 1594 valid questionnaires were included. More than half of Chinese rheumatologists reported it was challenging to make a diagnosis of PsA. The four major challenges were \"Difficulties in identification of atypical or hidden psoriasis\", \"Absence of diagnostic biomarkers\", \"No active self-report of history or family history of psoriasis\" and \"Various musculoskeletal manifestations\". In diagnosing PsA, minor participants had incorrect knowledge of inflammatory arthropathy (13.7%), acute phase reactant (23.8%), and rheumatoid factor (28.7%). There were no significant differences in the knowledge of PsA and practice habits in diagnosing PsA between modern western medicine (WM)- and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)-rheumatologists. The part-time rheumatologists were not as good as full-time rheumatologists in diagnosing PsA.
    About three quarters of Chinese rheumatologists are familiar with the elements in PsA diagnosis and have good practice habits in diagnosing PsA. Four main challenges in making PsA diagnosis are revealed. There was no significant difference in the knowledge of PsA between WM- and TCM-rheumatologists.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Adult onset Still\'s disease (AOSD) is a rare polygenic autoinflammatory disease mainly manifesting as high-spiking fever, rash, arthritis/arthralgia, lymphadenopathy, and leukocytosis. More importantly, life threatening macrophage activation syndrome may occur in AOSD patients. Recently, with the development of research in pathogenesis and therapy strategies of biological agents and small molecule targeted drugs, we have new recognition of AOSD. In this commentary, we attempt to place this syndrome in perspective, including data in the past year on pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features and therapy.
    成人Still病(AOSD)是一种少见多因素自身炎症性疾病,以发热、皮疹、关节炎/痛、淋巴结肿大、白细胞升高等为主要表现。AOSD还可出现严重并发症如巨噬细胞活化综合征,危及患者生命。最近一年,随着对AOSD发病机制的深入研究以及生物制剂和小分子靶向药物的广泛应用,人们对AOSD有了更多新的认识。本文将对近一年来在AOSD发病机制、临床表现和治疗等方面的进展进行述评,并对未来研究方向提出希望。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨中国风湿病学家对难治性痛风的认识。
    方法:我们对参加年度全国风湿病学术会议的风湿病学家进行了匿名调查。
    结果:在完成问卷的910位风湿病专家中,751人(82.5%)接受了相关的继续医学教育(CME)。其中,140名(18.6%)风湿病学家没有选择黄嘌呤氧化酶抑制剂作为慢性痛风石性痛风患者的首选治疗方法。在所有受访者中,113(12.4%),251(27.6%)和324(35.6%)规定了不正确的别嘌醇最大剂量,非布索坦和苯溴马隆,分别;这种趋势在非CME组中更为明显。大多数风湿病学家认为,并发症和合并症增加了痛风治疗的难度,并认为术语难治性痛风来描述那些症状不受控制的病例。标准化药物治疗后未达到治疗目标或痛风石不收缩。此外,62.8%(472/751)的专家认为,尽管接受了充分的教育和定期的降尿酸治疗,但生活方式和依从性未能改善的患者仍适合难治性痛风的诊断。
    结论:不正确和不充分的药物治疗可能导致一些难治性痛风病例。特别是在没有CME的医生中。强调非药物治疗以及合并症和并发症的管理可能会减少难治性痛风的病例。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the understanding of refractory gout in Chinese rheumatologists.
    METHODS: We conducted an anonymous survey of rheumatologists attending an annual national academic conference on rheumatism.
    RESULTS: Of the 910 rheumatologists who completed the questionnaire, 751 (82.5%) had received relevant continuing medical education (CME). Of these, 140 (18.6%) rheumatologists did not select xanthine oxidase inhibitors as the first treatment for patients with chronic tophaceous gout. Of all respondents, 113 (12.4%), 251 (27.6%) and 324 (35.6%) prescribed incorrect maximum doses of allopurinol, febuxostat and benzbromarone, respectively; this tendency was more pronounced in the non-CME group. Most rheumatologists agreed that complications and comorbidities increased the difficulty of gout management and considered the term refractory gout to describe those cases with uncontrolled symptoms, unmet treatment targets or non-shrinkage of tophi after standardized drug treatment. Moreover, 62.8% (472/751) of specialists considered that a diagnosis of refractory gout was appropriate for patients whose lifestyle and compliance failed to improve despite adequate education and regular urate-lowering therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Incorrect and inadequate drug therapy may contribute to some cases of refractory gout, especially in physicians without CME. An emphasis on non-drug therapy and the management of comorbidities and complications may reduce cases of refractory gout.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the characteristics of refractory RA and its contributory factors based on the understanding of the rheumatologists of China.
    METHODS: A national cross-sectional survey was performed in 32 provinces across China, and 1381 rheumatologists were recruited. Information about the sociodemographic background, refractory RA characteristics, and contributory factors was collected using a pre-made questionnaire including fourteen single-choice and four multiple-choice questions, respectively. Each of the single-choice and multiple-choice question had several items.
    RESULTS: In response to the single-choice questions regarding the definition of refractory RA, 52.28% responded that \"the 28 joint disease activity score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) > 5.1 with presence of signs suggestive of inflammatory disease\" is characteristic of refractory RA, whereas 50.18% opined that \"If target was not achieved with 2 conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) combined with 1 biological or 1 targeted synthetic DMARD (b/tsDMARD), over a total of 3~6 months\" should be considered refractory RA. In addition, 39.32% rheumatologists were in favor of inability to taper glucocorticoids (GCs) ≤ 10mg prednisone or equivalent daily. Additional features considered characteristics of refractory RA were extra-articular manifestations (84.94%), interfering comorbidities (76.32%), and radiographic progression (71.83%). Among the contributory factors, 92.03% considered infection, and interstitial lung disease was chosen by 90.95%, vasculitis by 82.26%, osteoporosis by 70.67%, and fibromyalgia syndrome by 70.38%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our survey has demonstrated a variety of concepts of refractory RA among the rheumatologists of China. Disease activity assessment, treatment options, interfering comorbidities, and radiological progression all were associated with the characteristics of refractory RA. Key Points • This study demonstrated the definition, characteristics, and contributing factors of refractory RA from the rheumatologists\' views in China. • The clarification of the insights and concepts on refractory RA will help to make comprehensive guidelines to treat this disease, further improving prognosis and reducing the societal burdens of RA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号