rheumatologists

风湿病学家
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管它们很少,莱姆病和Whipple病在风湿病中具有重要意义,因为两者都可以表现为慢性关节炎,在炎性关节病的鉴别诊断中提出了挑战。在莱姆病中,关节炎通常是一种晚期表现,通常发生在游走性红斑发作后6个月。主要表现涉及大关节的单关节炎或少关节炎,有慢性或复发的过程。即使有适当的抗菌治疗,由于疾病引发的免疫控制不足,关节炎可能会持续存在。相比之下,Whipple病可能表现为大关节的转移性和间歇性血清阴性多发性或少关节炎,在经典的胃肠道症状之前几年。两种疾病,尤其是Whipple的病,可误诊为较常见的自身免疫性风湿病,如类风湿性关节炎和脊柱关节炎。流行病学对于怀疑和诊断莱姆病至关重要,因为这种情况是由美国特定地区流行的蜱传播的,欧洲,和亚洲。相反,Whipple病的病原体广泛存在于环境中,然而,侵袭性疾病是罕见的,可能依赖于宿主的遗传因素。除了莱姆病中的游走性红斑和Whipple病的胃肠道表现,神经和心脏受累会使两者的病程进一步复杂化。这篇文章提供了一个全面的流行病学综述,病理生理学,临床,以及这两种疾病的治疗方面。
    Despite their rarity, Lyme disease and Whipple\'s disease are of significant importance in rheumatology, as both can manifest as chronic arthritis, presenting challenges in the differential diagnosis of inflammatory arthropathies. In Lyme disease, arthritis typically emerges as a late manifestation, usually occurring six months after the onset of erythema migrans. The predominant presentation involves mono- or oligoarthritis of large joints, with a chronic or remitting-recurrent course. Even with appropriate antimicrobial treatment, arthritis may persist due to inadequate immunological control triggered by the disease. In contrast, Whipple\'s disease may present with a migratory and intermittent seronegative poly- or oligoarthritis of large joints, preceding classic gastrointestinal symptoms by several years. Both disorders, particularly Whipple\'s disease, can be misdiagnosed as more common autoimmune rheumatic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis. Epidemiology is crucial in suspecting and diagnosing Lyme disease, as the condition is transmitted by ticks prevalent in specific areas of the United States, Europe, and Asia. On the contrary, the causative agent of Whipple\'s disease is widespread in the environment, yet invasive disease is rare and likely dependent on host genetic factors. In addition to erythema migrans in Lyme disease and gastrointestinal manifestations in Whipple\'s disease, neurological and cardiac involvement can further complicate the course of both. This article offers a comprehensive review of the epidemiological, pathophysiological, clinical, and therapeutic aspects of both diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:多种生物治疗失败的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者亚组被认为患有“难以治疗”(D2T)RA。2021年,欧洲风湿病学协会联盟(EULAR)工作组提出了D2TRA的临床定义。在这里,我们回顾RA的表型和RA的临床评估,提出D2TRA的不同定义,讨论可能的D2TRA危险因素,并对现有D2TRA管理文献进行总结。
    结果:在诊断时或在使用生物制剂治疗之前的高疾病活动性与D2TRA的发展相关。从诊断到开始治疗的时间延长一直与D2TRA的发展有关。其他临床因素,如疾病负担,关节外疾病,肥胖,吸烟,疼痛,疲劳,根据目前的文献,心理状况与D2TRA有不一致的关联。D2TRA是一个相对较新的概念,它代表了一个非常需要研究的领域,涉及疾病患者的表征以及如何最好地治疗疾病。有了这些获得的知识,风湿病学家将能够在诊断时更好地识别可能发展为D2TRA的患者,以帮助指导治疗.
    A subset of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who fail multiple biologic therapies are deemed to have \"difficult-to-treat\" (D2T) RA. In 2021, a European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) task force proposed a clinical definition of D2T RA. Here we review RA phenotypes and clinical assessment of RA, propose a different definition of D2T RA, discuss possible D2T RA risk factors, and summarize existing literature on the management of D2T RA.
    High disease activity at the time of diagnosis or prior to treatment with a biologic is associated with the development of D2T RA. Prolonged time from diagnosis to beginning treatment has been consistently associated with the development of D2T RA. Other clinical factors such as burden of disease, extraarticular disease, obesity, smoking, pain, fatigue, and psychological conditions have inconsistent associations with D2T RA according to current literature. D2T RA is a relatively new concept that represents an area of great need for research regarding the characterization of those with the disease as well as how best to treat the disease. With this gained knowledge, rheumatologists will be able to better identify patients at the time of diagnosis that are likely to develop D2T RA to help guide management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:临床就诊是风湿性疾病护理的基本方面,但是指南中基本上没有关于适当访问频率的建议,几乎没有研究,和不一致的报道。本系统综述的目的是总结有关主要风湿性疾病就诊频率的证据。
    方法:本系统综述是根据PRISMA指南进行的。标题/摘要筛选,全文筛选,并由两名独立作者进行提取。提取或计算年度就诊频率,并按疾病类型和研究国家进行分层。计算加权平均年访问频率。
    结果:筛选了273条相关的手稿记录,和28在应用选择标准后被纳入.纳入的研究在美国和非美国之间平均分配,并在1985年至2021年之间发表。大多数(n=16)集中在类风湿性关节炎(RA),系统性红斑狼疮(SLE,n=5),和纤维肌痛(FM,n=4)。对于RA,美国风湿病学家的平均年就诊频率为5.25,4.80美国非风湿病学家,3.29非美国风湿病学家,非美国非风湿病学家为2.74。对于SLE,非风湿病学家的年度访视频率远高于美国风湿病学家(12.3vs3.24).对于FM,美国风湿病学家的年访视频率为1.80,非美国风湿病学家的年访视频率为0.40.从1982年到2019年,风湿病学家的就诊频率呈下降趋势。
    结论:在全球范围内,风湿病临床就诊的证据有限且异质性。然而,总体趋势表明,近年来美国的访问频率更高,而访问频率更低。
    Clinical visits are a fundamental aspect of rheumatic disease care, but recommendations for appropriate visit frequencies are largely absent from guidelines, scarcely studied, and inconsistently reported. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence pertaining to visit frequencies for major rheumatic diseases.
    This systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Title/abstract screening, full-text screening, and extraction were carried out by 2 independent authors. Annual visit frequencies were either extracted or calculated and stratified by disease type and country of study. Weighted mean annual visit frequencies were calculated.
    A total of 273 relevant manuscript records were screened, and 28 were included after applying selection criteria. The included studies were equally divided between US and non-US and were published between 1985 and 2021. Most (n = 16) focused on rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; n = 5), and fibromyalgia (FM; n = 4). For RA, the average annual visit frequencies were 5.25 for US rheumatologists, 4.80 for US non-rheumatologists, 3.29 for non-US rheumatologists, and 2.74 for non-US non-rheumatologists. For SLE, annual visit frequencies for non-rheumatologists were much higher than for US rheumatologists (12.3 versus 3.24). For FM, annual visit frequencies were 1.80 for US rheumatologists and 0.40 for non-US rheumatologists. There was a decreasing trend of visit frequency to rheumatologists from 1982 to 2019.
    Evidence for rheumatology clinical visits was limited and heterogeneous on a global scale. However, general trends suggest more frequent visits in the US and less frequent visits in recent years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    大多数系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者在病程中的某些时候都有皮肤表现。根据组织病理学发现,SLE中的皮肤发现分为SLE特异性或SLE非特异性。SLE特异性皮肤病包括慢性皮肤红斑狼疮(CLE),亚急性CLE,和急性CLE。每组中有皮肤病变的子集,并且其中相关SLE的可能性各不相同。SLE非特异性病变在SLE患者中更为常见,并且倾向于与活动性全身性疾病相吻合。SLE非特异性病变可能被视为另一种疾病过程的特征,包括其他结缔组织疾病。对于风湿病学家来说,熟悉SLE的皮肤疾病谱很重要,以帮助预测全身性疾病的可能性,并确保患者及时接受皮肤病治疗,以控制疾病活动以防止损害。
    The majority of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have cutaneous manifestations at some point in their disease course. The skin findings in SLE are classified as SLE-specific or SLE-nonspecific based on histopathologic findings. SLE-specific skin diseases include chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), subacute CLE, and acute CLE. There are subsets of skin lesions within each group and the likelihood of associated SLE varies among them. SLE-nonspecific lesions are more common in patients with SLE and tend to coincide with active systemic disease. SLE-nonspecific lesions may be seen as a feature of another disease process, including other connective tissue diseases. It is important for the rheumatologist to be familiar with the spectrum of cutaneous diseases in SLE to help prognosticate the likelihood of systemic disease and to ensure patients receive timely dermatologic care with the goal of controlling disease activity to prevent damage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解影响疾病缓解抗风湿药物(DMARDs)处方的因素将为优化炎症性关节炎患者的护理提供策略。我们对定性研究进行了系统回顾和专题综合,以探讨这些因素。纳入标准是:使用定性或混合方法;风湿病学家,护士或药剂师的观点;任何DMARD的处方(常规[cs],目标合成[ts],生物[b],生物仿制药)和/或糖皮质激素;在任何国家的任何医疗保健环境中。MEDLINE,从开始到2021年6月15日,搜索了Embase和EBSCOhostCINAHLPlus。成对的综述作者独立确定了纳入研究,使用关键评估技能计划清单评估方法质量,提取和主题合成的数据。使用定性研究评论(CERQual)方法对综合主题的信心进行了评估。我们纳入了15项研究,涉及716名临床医生(683名风湿病学家,27名护士,6名药剂师)遍布10个国家,所有这些都集中在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的管理上。确定了六个主题:风湿病学家的处方受患者特征的影响,preferences,症状和对药物的负面反应;风湿病学家知识,经验,习惯和主观判断是处方行为的重要驱动因素;对咨询时间的高要求阻碍了共同决策;药物筹资安排的成本和复杂性限制了处方选择;临床医生认识到向患者提供药物选择教育的重要性;临床医生重视同事的意见和支持以告知处方决策。大多数主题被评为中等置信度(n=4),反映它们可能合理地代表了影响RA患者处方DMARDs的因素。解决这些因素的质量改进策略可能支持RA的最佳实践药理学管理,并可能适用于其他类型的炎性关节炎。对咨询时间的高需求和药物资助安排的复杂性是可能或可能无法改变的系统因素。容易获得的活生生的国家指南,包括支持处方决策的总结和治疗算法,可能会解决一些主题。
    Understanding factors that influence prescribing of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) will inform strategies to optimise care of people with inflammatory arthritis. We performed a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies to explore these factors. Inclusion criteria were: use of qualitative or mixed methods; rheumatologist, nurse or pharmacist perspectives; prescription of any DMARD (conventional [cs], targeted synthetic [ts], biologic [b], biosimilars) and/or glucocorticoids; in any healthcare setting in any country. MEDLINE, Embase and EBSCOhost CINAHL Plus were searched from inception to 15 June 2021. Pairs of review authors independently identified studies for inclusion, assessed methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist, and extracted and thematically synthesised data. Confidence in synthesis themes was evaluated using the GRADE Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) approach. We included 15 studies involving 716 clinicians (683 rheumatologists, 27 nurses, 6 pharmacists) across 10 countries, all focusing on management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Six themes were identified: Rheumatologist prescribing is influenced by patients\' characteristics, preferences, symptoms and negative responses to medication; Rheumatologist knowledge, experience, habits and subjective judgements are strong drivers of prescribing behaviour; High demands on consultation time impede shared decision-making; Costs and complexity of medication funding arrangements limit prescribing options; Clinicians recognise the importance of providing patient education about medication options; and Clinicians value colleagues\' opinions and support to inform prescribing decisions. The majority of themes were graded as moderate confidence (n  =  4), reflecting they are likely to reasonably represent the factors influencing prescribing of DMARDs to people with RA. Quality improvement strategies that address these factors are likely to support best practice pharmacologic management of RA and may be potentially applicable to other types of inflammatory arthritis. High demand on consultation time and complexity of medication funding arrangements are system factors that may or may not be amenable to change. Easily accessible living national guidelines which include lay summaries and treatment algorithms to support prescribing decisions may address some of the themes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    严格评估评估炎症性肠病(IBD)患者脊柱关节炎(SpA)表型的研究设计。PubMed的系统文献综述,奥维德,Scopus,Cinahl,Medline,WebofScience,并进行了Cochrane数据库。2000年1月至2020年3月发表的文章被纳入,如果他们评估了IBD患者队列中肌肉骨骼疾病的患病率/发病率。69项纳入的研究大多是临床研究(54/69,78%),单中心(47/69,68%)和横截面(60/69,87%)。IBD中轴向和外周SpA的中位患病率为5%(范围1-46%)和16%(范围1-43%),分别。在38项评估前瞻性登记患者轴性疾病的研究中,在53%中分析了炎性背痛.68%的患者使用了SpA分类标准,76%的患者进行了影像学检查。在35项评估前瞻性登记患者外周疾病的研究中,46%的人使用了SpA分类标准。74%的人进行了身体检查,它是由风湿病学家在54%的研究中进行的身体检查。外周SpA的亚表型(单或寡关节炎,多发性关节炎,附着性炎,dactyitis)werevariousreported.74%的研究没有提到骨关节炎和纤维肌痛是否已被评估或排除。IBD患者的SpA表型谱仍未完全表征。未来的研究应该集中在标准化IBD-SpA队列中收集的变量,并定义IBD-SpA中的肌肉骨骼表型,以便更好地表征该疾病实体并为临床和研究目的推进该领域。
    To critically appraise study designs evaluating spondyloarthritis (SpA) phenotypes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A systematic literature review of PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, Cinahl, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed. Articles published from January 2000 - March 2020 were included if they evaluated the prevalence/incidence of musculoskeletal disease in cohorts of IBD patients. Most of the 69 included studies were clinic based (54/69, 78%), single center (47/69, 68%) and cross-sectional (60/69, 87%). The median prevalence of axial and peripheral SpA in IBD was 5% (range 1 - 46%) and 16% (range 1 - 43%), respectively. In 38 studies that evaluated axial disease in prospectively enrolled patients, inflammatory back pain was analyzed in 53%. SpA classification criteria were used in 68% and imaging was performed in 76%. In 35 studies that evaluated peripheral disease in prospectively enrolled patients, SpA classification criteria were used in 46%. A physical exam was performed in 74%, and it was performed by a rheumatologist in 54% of studies with a physical exam. Sub-phenotypes of peripheral SpA (mono- or oligo-arthritis, polyarthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis) were variably reported. Seventy-four percent of studies did not mention whether osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia had been assessed or excluded. The spectrum of SpA phenotypes in IBD patients remains incompletely characterized. Future studies should focus on standardizing the variables collected in IBD-SpA cohorts and defining musculoskeletal phenotypes in IBD-SpA in order to better characterize this disease entity and advance the field for clinical and research purposes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To estimate the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from international population-based studies and investigate the influence of prevalence definition, data sources, classification criteria, and geographical area on RA prevalence.
    A search of ProQuest, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE was undertaken to identify population-based studies investigating RA prevalence between 1980 and 2019. Studies were reviewed using the Joanna Briggs Institute approach for the systematic review and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
    Sixty studies met the inclusion criteria. There was a wide range of point prevalence reported (0.00-2.70%) with a mean of 0.56% (SD 0.51) between 1986 and 2014, and a mean period prevalence of 0.51% (SD 0.35) between 1955 and 2015. RA point and period prevalence was higher in urban settings (0.69% vs 0.48%) than in rural settings (0.54% vs 0.25%). An RA diagnosis validated by rheumatologists yielded the highest period prevalence of RA and was observed in linked databases (0.80%, SD 0.1).
    The literature reports a wide range of point and period prevalence based on population and method of data collection, but average point and period prevalence of RA were 51 in 10,000 and 56 in 10,000, respectively. Higher urban vs rural prevalence may be biased due to poor case findings in areas with less healthcare or differences in risk environment. The population database studies were more consistent than sampling studies, and linked databases in different continents appeared to provide a consistent estimate of RA period prevalence, confirming the high value of rheumatologist diagnosis as classification criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Most recommendations for the use of methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are issued by developed countries. It is unknown whether they are relevant globally. We reviewed existing recommendations on the use of MTX for the treatment of RA and summarized areas of agreement that could be relevant for least developed countries (LDCs).
    METHODS: Electronic databases and registries were searched for recommendations on MTX use in RA, duplicates were eliminated, and the most updated version adopted when there were several versions on the same recommendation. Reviewers used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument for study quality assessment. Similarities and discrepancies of recommendations are reported.
    RESULTS: After deduplication, 1693 unique citations were found; 25 full texts were screened and 12 included in the narrative synthesis. Average scores for the AGREE II domains ranged from 33.3 to 83.3%. Recommendations targeted rheumatologists and health care providers involved in RA care. Most covered some but not all of the following areas: baseline \"pre-MTX\" assessment (7/12;58%), prescription of MTX (10/12;83.3%), management of MTX side effects (6/12;50%), and special considerations (e.g., peri-operative management) (8/12; 66.7%). Recommendations agreed on baseline tests prior to starting MTX, monitoring, and need for folic acid supplementation. These aspects can serve as the foundation for the development of MTX recommendations relevant to LDCs. Recommendations disagreed on the MTX starting dose, optimal route, titration, and intervals to monitor toxicity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Existing recommendations do not uniformly address all aspects related to the use of MTX and disagree in relevant aspects of MTX use. Adaptations to these recommendations are needed to facilitate their implementation in LDCs. Key Points • This paper summarizes current recommendations on the use of methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. • Areas of agreement between recommendations include the following: pre-methotrexate patient assessment, need for folic acid supplementation, and toxicity monitoring. • Areas of disagreement relate to methotrexate starting and maximal dose, titration, and frequency of assessments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号