respiratory symptoms

呼吸道症状
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺结节(PNs)通常被认为太小而不会引起呼吸道症状。然而,许多PN患者出现不明原因的呼吸道症状.本研究旨在探讨这些症状并确定相关因素。
    回顾性收集了1,633名在广东省人民医院胸科门诊就诊的偶发PNs患者的人口统计学和临床资料。采用医院焦虑抑郁量表评定其焦虑抑郁水平。采用Logistic回归分析评估呼吸道症状的独立危险因素及其对患者的心理影响。
    在1633名患者中,37.2%报告了至少一种呼吸道症状。PNs患者最常见的症状是咳嗽(23.6%),其次是胸痛(14.0%),咳痰(13.8%)和咯血(1.3%)。大PNs(>20mm)患者出现咳嗽[比值比(OR)=2.5;P=0.011]和咳痰(OR=3.6;P=0.001)的几率显著增高。与单独PNs患者相比,多个PNs患者更容易发生胸痛(OR=1.5;P=0.007)。环境因素,如被动吸烟,厨房油烟污染,环境粉尘是这些呼吸道症状存在的一致风险因素.在常规健康检查中接受胸部计算机断层扫描扫描的个体亚组中观察到了可比的发现。呼吸道症状的存在,尤其是胸痛,患者出现焦虑(OR=2.2;P<0.001)和抑郁(OR=2.5;P<0.001)的几率增加。
    呼吸道症状在PN患者中很常见,在具有较大和多个PN的患者中,患病率更高,并且与暴露于环境危险因素密切相关。这些症状可能会加剧患者的焦虑和抑郁水平。
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonary nodules (PNs) are commonly considered too small to cause respiratory symptoms. However, many PN patients present with respiratory symptoms of unknown origin. This study aims to explore these symptoms and identify the associated factors.
    UNASSIGNED: Demographic and clinical information were retrospectively collected from 1,633 patients with incidental PNs who visited the thoracic outpatient clinic of Guangdong Provincial People\'s Hospital. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to assess their anxiety and depression level. Logistic regression analyzes were employed to assess the independent risk factors for respiratory symptoms and the psychological impact on patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 1,633 patients, 37.2% reported at least one respiratory symptom. The most common symptoms in patients with PNs were cough (23.6%), followed by chest pain (14.0%), expectoration (13.8%) and hemoptysis (1.3%). Patients with large PNs (>20 mm) showed significantly higher odds of having cough [odds ratio (OR) =2.5; P=0.011] and expectoration (OR =3.6; P=0.001). Patients with multiple PNs were more susceptible to chest pain compared to those with solitary PNs (OR =1.5; P=0.007). Environmental factors such as passive smoking, kitchen fume pollution, environmental dust were the consistent risk contributors to the presence of these respiratory symptoms. Comparable findings were observed among the subgroup of individuals who undergo chest computed tomography scans as a part of their routine health check-up. Presence of respiratory symptoms, especially chest pain, was associated with increased the odds of anxiety (OR =2.2; P<0.001) and depression (OR =2.5; P<0.001) in patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Respiratory symptoms are common in PN patients, exhibiting a higher prevalence in patients with larger and multiple PNs and there is a strong association with exposure to environmental risk factors. These symptoms might exacerbate the anxiety and depression level in patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨青年慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的临床特点及肺功能损害。
    方法:回顾性纳入2017年8月至2022年3月在广州医科大学附属第一医院接受症状评估和综合肺功能检查的COPD患者。根据年龄将患者分为两组:年轻COPD组(年龄20-50岁)和老年COPD组(年龄>50岁)。
    结果:共1282例COPD患者纳入研究,76例年轻COPD患者和1206例老年COPD患者。年轻的COPD患者表现出更高的无症状的可能性,较低的吸烟率,与老年COPD患者相比,吸烟指数较低。尽管年轻的COPD患者在1s(BD后FEV1)中支气管扩张剂后用力呼气容积中位数较高(1.4vs.1.2L,P=0.019),肺对一氧化碳的扩散能力(DLCO)(7.2vs.4.6,P<0.001),和较低的中位数残余体积与总肺活量比(RV/TLC)相比,他们的年龄,根据GOLD类别或肺过度充气比例(RV/TLC%pred>120%),两组的严重程度分布无差异.令人惊讶的是,在年轻的COPD中,DLCO降低的患病率为71.1%,虽然低于老年COPD(85.2%)。
    结论:年轻的COPD表现出较少的呼吸道症状,但按黄金类别显示了类似的严重性分布。此外,他们中的大多数表现为肺过度膨胀和减少DLCO。这些结果强调了全面评估年轻COPD患者肺功能的重要性。
    OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and lung function impairment in young people diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
    METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled patients with COPD who underwent symptom assessment and comprehensive pulmonary function tests at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between August 2017 and March 2022. The patients were categorized into two groups based on age: a young COPD group (aged 20-50 years) and an old COPD group (aged > 50 years).
    RESULTS: A total of 1282 patients with COPD were included in the study, with 76 young COPD patients and 1206 old COPD patients. Young COPD patients exhibited a higher likelihood of being asymptomatic, lower rates of smoking, and a lower smoking index compared to old COPD patients. Although young COPD patients had higher median post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (post-BD FEV1) (1.4 vs.1.2 L, P = 0.019), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (7.2 vs. 4.6, P<0.001), and a lower median residual volume to total lung capacity ratio (RV/TLC) compared to their older counterparts, there were no differences observed in severity distribution by GOLD categories or the proportion of lung hyperinflation (RV/TLC%pred > 120%) between two groups. Surprisingly, the prevalence of reduced DLCO was found to be 71.1% in young COPD, although lower than in old COPD (85.2%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Young COPD showed fewer respiratory symptoms, yet displayed a similar severity distribution by GOLD categories. Furthermore, a majority of them demonstrated lung hyperinflation and reduced DLCO. These results underscore the importance of a comprehensive assessment of lung function in young COPD patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    双重使用的普遍性和电子烟(EC)使用者的戒烟率相对较低,这表明EC作为戒烟工具并未表现出明显的有效性。此外,近年来,EC的使用率大幅增加。因此,本研究的目的是探讨EC使用与呼吸道症状和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)发病率之间的关系.共有10,326名年龄在20至55岁之间的参与者,没有任何呼吸道疾病或COPD,被招募参加这项研究。这些人参加了在河北省16家公立医院进行的员工体检,中国从2015年到2020年。使用Logistic回归模型来评估EC使用与呼吸道症状和COPD风险之间的关联,使用风险比及其相应的95%置信区间。使用受限的三次样条函数来研究剂量反应的非线性关系。通过亚组分析评估逻辑回归模型的稳健性,和敏感性分析。在5年的随访期间,本队列研究共发现1,071例呼吸道症状事件和146例COPD事件.在调整相关混杂因素后,EC使用者报告呼吸道症状和COPD的风险分别增加了28%和8%。此外,同时使用EC和可燃香烟的双重使用者表现出发生呼吸道症状和COPD的风险分别增加了41%和18%,分别,与从未使用过任何香烟产品的非使用者相比。每日食用EC与呼吸道症状发展之间的关系,以及COPD,表现出显著的J形图案。ECs消费之间的潜在不利关联,特别是与可燃香烟结合使用时,呼吸道症状和COPD的发展需要仔细考虑。政策制定者应谨慎对待EC,将其作为未来的戒烟工具。
    The prevalence of dual usage and the relatively low cessation rate among e-cigarette (EC) users suggest that ECs have not demonstrated significant effectiveness as a smoking cessation tool. Furthermore, there has been a substantial increase in the prevalence of EC usage in recent years. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate the association between EC use and the incidence of respiratory symptoms and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A total of 10,326 participants aged between 20 and 55 years, without any respiratory diseases or COPD, were recruited for the study. These individuals attended employee physical examinations conducted at 16 public hospitals in Hebei province, China from 2015 to 2020. Logistic regression models were utilized to assess the association between EC use and the risk of respiratory symptoms and COPD using risk ratios along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Restricted cubic spline functions were employed to investigate the dose-response non-linear relationship. The robustness of the logistic regression models was evaluated through subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses. During the 5-year follow-up period, a total of 1071 incident cases of respiratory symptoms and 146 incident cases of COPD were identified in this cohort study. After adjusting for relevant confounding factors, EC users demonstrated a respective increase in the risk of reporting respiratory symptoms and COPD by 28% and 8%. Furthermore, dual users who used both ECs and combustible cigarettes exhibited an elevated risk of incident respiratory symptoms and COPD by 41% and 18%, respectively, compared to those who had never used non-users of any cigarette products. The association between daily EC consumption and the development of respiratory symptoms, as well as COPD, demonstrated a significant J-shaped pattern. The potential adverse association between the consumption of ECs, particularly when used in combination with combustible cigarettes, and the development of respiratory symptoms and COPD necessitates careful consideration. Policymakers should approach ECs cautiously as a prospective smoking cessation tool.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是全球范围内导致死亡的主要原因之一,因此,识别可改变的风险因素[如暴露于蒸汽,气体,粉尘和烟气(VGDF)]对于加速疾病进展具有重要意义。
    我们在2014年至2019年期间在中国南方六个城市进行了COPD监测。我们记录了慢性支气管炎的诊断,呼吸道症状,使用结构化问卷对VGDF和其他协变量的职业暴露。采用Logistic回归和多元线性回归模型进行分析。我们基于两种倾向评分(PS)方法进行了敏感性分析,以评估我们结果的稳健性。
    总共包括7,418名参与者。咳嗽[比值比(OR):1.60,95%置信区间(CI):1.22至2.08]和痰(OR:1.49,95%CI:1.19至1.85)与暴露于灰尘显着相关。职业暴露于气体/蒸气/烟雾的咳嗽风险增加(OR:1.53,95%CI:1.11至2.07)。双重暴露于灰尘和气体/蒸气/烟雾与慢性支气管炎的风险显着增加相关(OR:1.74,95%CI:1.20至2.52),咳嗽(OR:1.43,95%CI:1.15至1.79)和痰(OR:1.49,95%CI:1.24至1.79)。在5249名具有完整肺活量测定数据的参与者中,气体/蒸气/烟雾与一秒用力呼气量和用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC)(β:-1.05,95%CI:-1.85~-0.26)和最大中呼气流量(MMEF)(β:-0.15,95%CI:-0.23~-0.07)的比值降低相关.双重暴露于灰尘和气体/蒸气/烟雾与FEV1/FVC(β:-0.74,95%CI:-1.28至-0.20)和MMEF(β:-0.06,95%CI:-0.12至-0.01)降低显着相关。敏感性分析的结果没有实质性变化。
    VGDF暴露与慢性支气管炎有关,呼吸道症状和肺功能下降,提示VGDF参与COPD的发病和进展。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, and therefore the identification of the modifiable risk factors [such as exposure to vapors, gases, dust and fumes (VGDF)] for accelerate disease progression has important significance.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted COPD surveillance in six cities of southern China between 2014 and 2019. We recorded the diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, respiratory symptoms, occupational exposure to VGDF and other covariates by using a structured questionnaire. Logistic regression and multivariate linear regression model were adopted for analysis. We performed sensitivity analyses based on two methods of propensity score (PS) methods to evaluate the robustness of our results.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 7,418 participants were included. Cough [odds ratios (ORs): 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22 to 2.08] and phlegm (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.85) correlated significantly with exposure to dust. There was an increased risk of cough (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.07) for occupational exposure to gas/vapor/fume. Dual exposure to dust and gas/vapor/fume was associated with a significantly increased risk of chronic bronchitis (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.20 to 2.52), cough (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.79) and phlegm (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.79). In 5,249 participants with complete data of spirometry, gas/vapor/fume was associated with a decreased ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) (β: -1.05, 95% CI: -1.85 to -0.26) and maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) (β: -0.15, 95% CI: -0.23 to -0.07). Dual exposure to dust and gas/vapor/fume was significantly associated with decreased FEV1/FVC (β: -0.74, 95% CI: -1.28 to -0.20) and MMEF (β: -0.06, 95% CI: -0.12 to -0.01). Results of sensitivity analysis were not materially changed.
    UNASSIGNED: VGDF exposure is associated with chronic bronchitis, respiratory symptoms and decreased lung function, suggesting that VGDF contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of COPD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:遗传因素在惊恐障碍(PD)的发病机制中起重要作用。然而,遗传变异对PD的影响仍存在争议.
    目的:评估谷氨酸脱羧酶1(GAD1)基因多态性与PD发病风险的关系,并评估GAD1基因多态性对PD临床症状严重程度的影响。
    方法:本研究招募了230名PD患者和224名健康对照。使用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)和恐慌症严重程度量表(PDSS)评估所有参与者的焦虑和恐慌症状严重程度。对GAD1基因多态性(rs1978340和rs3749034)进行基因分型并评估等位基因频率。
    结果:GAD1的基因型分布或等位基因频率在病例和对照组之间没有显着差异(rs1978340和rs3749034)。此外,GAD1(rs1978340和rs3749034)对PD严重程度的影响不显著。然而,关于呼吸道症状,GAD1rs1978340A/A基因型患者的评分明显高于A/G或G/G基因型患者.
    结论:这里,我们发现GAD1rs1978340的A/A基因型与PD患者呼吸道症状严重程度增加相关.
    BACKGROUND: Genetic factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of panic disorder (PD). However, the effect of genetic variants on PD remains controversial.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the associations between glutamate decarboxylase 1 (GAD1) gene polymorphisms and PD risk and assess the effect of GAD1 gene polymorphisms on the severity of clinical symptoms in PD.
    METHODS: We recruited 230 PD patients and 224 healthy controls in this study. All participants were assessed for anxiety and panic symptom severity using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS). GAD1 gene polymorphisms (rs1978340 and rs3749034) were genotyped and assessed for allele frequencies.
    RESULTS: There were no significant differences between cases and controls in the genotype distributions or allele frequencies of GAD1 (rs1978340 and rs3749034). In addition, the effect of GAD1 (rs1978340 and rs3749034) on PD severity was not significant. However, regarding respiratory symptoms, patients with the GAD1 rs1978340 A/A genotype had significantly higher scores than those with the A/G or G/G genotype.
    CONCLUSIONS: Here, we showed that the A/A genotype of GAD1 rs1978340 was associated with increased severity of respiratory symptoms in patients with PD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经授权:探讨咽喉反流病(LPRD)与胃食管反流病(GERD)的关系。
    UNASSIGNED:对2021年4月7日至2021年6月10日在解放军总医院第六医学中心胃肠病门诊就诊的患者采用胃食管反流病问卷(GERD-Q)和反流症状指数(RSI)量表。GERD-Q评分>7的患者表示GERD,RSI>13的患者行LPRD。单纯GERD患者的分析(独立GERD,iG),LPRD和GERD患者(LPRD和GERD,L&G),简单LPRD患者(独立LPRD,iL)和正常组的百分比(GERDQ阴性和RSI阴性,N).
    未经评估:发放了3060份GERD-Q和RSI问卷,并返回2974份完整问卷。其中,274(9.20%)iL,334例(11.23%)iG和151例(5.10%)L&G患者和2215例(74.48%)N患者。本样本GERD阳性率为16.31%,其中31.13%共存LPRD,LPRD阳性率为14.29%,其中35.53%共存GERD。在患有LPRD的患者中,有呼吸道症状的患者并发GERD的阳性率(χ2=4.157,p=0.041)和RSI评分(Z=-6.823,p=0.000)明显高于无呼吸道症状的患者。
    UNASSIGNED:LPRD可以单独存在,也可以与GERD结合存在。同时患有LPRD和GERD的患者的反流症状最严重。需要关注那些最初只筛查GERD发展LPRD的风险。呼吸道症状在反流病中起重要作用。
    To investigate the relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
    Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERD-Q) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) scale were administered to patients attending the gastroenterology outpatient clinic at the Sixth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from 7 April 2021 to 10 June 2021. Patients with GERD-Q score >7 were indicated GERD, and patients with RSI >13 were indicated LPRD. The analysis of patients with pure GERD (independent GERD, iG), patients with LPRD and GERD (LPRD & GERD, L&G), patients with simple LPRD (independent LPRD, iL) and the percentage of normal group (GERDQ-negative and RSI-negative, N).
    3060 GERD-Q and RSI questionnaires were distributed, and 2974 complete questionnaires were returned. Among them, 274 (9.20%) iL, 334 (11.23%) iG and 151 (5.10%) L&G patients and 2215 (74.48%) N patients. The positive rate of GERD in this sample was 16.31%, of which 31.13% had coexisting LPRD, and the positive rate of LPRD was 14.29%, of which 35.53% had coexisting GERD. Among patients with LPRD, the positive rate of concomitant GERD (χ2 = 4.157, p = 0.041) and RSI score (Z = -6.823, p = 0.000) was significantly higher in patients with the presence of respiratory symptoms than in those without respiratory symptoms.
    LPRD can exist alone or in conjunction with GERD. Patients with both LPRD and GERD had the most severe reflux symptoms. The need to focus on the risk of those initially screened only with GERD developing LPRD. Respiratory symptoms play an important role in reflux disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:从2020年初开始,世界陷入了由新型冠状病毒病-19(COVID-19)引起的大流行。人们越来越多地在互联网网站上搜索与COVID-19相关的信息。百度指数是一个数据共享平台。提供的主要数据是搜索索引(SI),表示关键字在搜索中使用的频率。
    未经批准:2020年1月9日是COVID-19在中国爆发的重要日期。我们比较了7个关键词的SI前后的变化,包括“发烧”,\"咳嗽\",“恶心”,“呕吐”,“腹痛”,\"腹泻\",“便秘”。比较了SI变化曲线的斜率和峰值。选取了中国十个省份进行单独分析,包括北京,甘肃,广东,广西,黑龙江,湖北,四川,上海,新疆,西藏。分别分析SI的变化,并分析了SI与人口和经济数据之间的相关性。
    未经批准:在第一阶段,从2020年1月9日至1月25日,“腹泻”的SI平均日增幅(ADI)低于“咳嗽”(889.47vs.1,799.12,F=11.43,P=0.002)。在第二阶段,从2020年1月25日至4月8日,“腹泻”的SI平均日下降(ADD)显着低于“咳嗽”,具有统计学意义(咳嗽,191.40vs.441.44,F=68.66,P<0.001)。2020年1月9日(SI前)后的平均SI低于2020年1月9日(SI后)(发烧,2,616.41±116.92vs.3,724.51±867.81,P<0.001;咳嗽,3,260.04±308.43vs.5,590.66±874.25,P<0.001;腹泻,4,128.80±200.82vs.4,423.55±1,058.01,P<0.001)。前SI平均值与人口(P=0.004,R=0.813)和国内生产总值(GDP)(P<0.001,R=0.966)相关。SI后峰值与人群相关(P=0.007,R=0.789),国内生产总值(P=0.005,R=0.804),和先前确诊病例(PCC)(P=0.03,R=0.670)。SI的增长率与SI后峰值相关(P=0.04,R=0.649),PCC(P=0.003,R=0.835)。
    UNASSIGNED:在COVID-19爆发前后,腹泻在各省都受到广泛关注,可能与新型冠状病毒感染有关。互联网大数据可以反映公众对疾病的关注,这对于研究疾病的流行病学特征具有重要意义。
    UNASSIGNED: From the beginning of 2020, the world was plunged into a pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). People increasingly searched for information related to COVID-19 on internet websites. The Baidu Index is a data sharing platform. The main data provided is the search index (SI), which represents the frequency that keywords are used in searches.
    UNASSIGNED: January 9, 2020 is an important date for the outbreak of COVID-19 in China. We compared the changes of SI before and after for 7 keywords, including \"fever\", \"cough\", \"nausea\", \"vomiting\", \"abdominal pain\", \"diarrhea\", \"constipation\". The slope and peak values of SI change curves are compared. Ten provinces in China were selected for a separate analysis, including Beijing, Gansu, Guangdong, Guangxi, Heilongjiang, Hubei, Sichuan, Shanghai, Xinjiang, Tibet. The change of SI was analyzed separately, and the correlation between SI and demographic and economic data was analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: During period I, from January 9 to January 25, 2020, the average daily increase (ADI) of the SI for \"diarrhea\" was lower than that for \"cough\" (889.47 vs. 1,799.12, F=11.43, P=0.002). In period II, from January 25 to April 8, 2020, the average daily decrease (ADD) of the SI for \"diarrhea\" was significantly lower than that for \"cough\", with statistical significance (cough, 191.40 vs. 441.44, F=68.66, P<0.001). The mean SI after January 9, 2020 (pre-SI) was lower than that before January 9, 2020 (post-SI) (fever, 2,616.41±116.92 vs. 3,724.51±867.81, P<0.001; cough, 3,260.04±308.43 vs. 5,590.66±874.25, P<0.001; diarrhea, 4,128.80±200.82 vs. 4,423.55±1,058.01, P<0.001). The pre-SI mean was correlated with population (P=0.004, R=0.813) and gross domestic product (GDP) (P<0.001, R=0.966). The post-SI peak was correlated with population (P=0.007, R=0.789), GDP (P=0.005, R=0.804), and previously confirmed cases (PCC) (P=0.03, R=0.670). The growth rate of the SI was correlated with the post-SI peak (P=0.04, R=0.649), PCC (P=0.003, R=0.835).
    UNASSIGNED: Diarrhea was of widespread concern in all provinces before and after the COVID-19 outbreak and may be associated with novel coronavirus infection. Internet big data can reflect the public\'s concern about diseases, which is of great significance for the study of the epidemiological characteristics of diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    The patient had several close contacts with friends from Wuhan, the epicenter of the epidemic. His mother and father had close contact with him. His father was later diagnosed with COVID-19 infection after a positive reverse transcription PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The patient and his mother were diagnosed as suspected cases of COVID-19 based on a history of exposure, clinical manifestation, and imaging examination. However, the patient was tested more than three times with the reverse transcription PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and the results were negative each time. COVID-19 should be suspected, regardless of SARS-CoV-2 test negativity, for recent close contact with a confirmed case and respiratory symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们旨在调查感染控制行为的使用,预防和治疗干预措施,以及中国COVID-19大流行期间在线调查的受访者的结果。
    方法:调查是由一个国际团队设计的,翻译并改编成简体中文,其中包括指南推荐的132种中药制剂。它是在2021年2月至5月分发和收集的,数据通过WPS电子表格和wjx进行分析。cn.描述性统计用于描述人口统计学和临床特征,诊断,治疗,预防行为和干预措施,及其相关结果。
    结果:该调查访问了503次,完成了341次(67.8%),覆盖了中国23个省和4个直辖市。大多数(282/341,82.7%)受访者报告在大流行期间没有症状,大多数(290/341,85.0%)报告在某个时候进行了SARS-CoV-2PCR测试。45人(13.2%)报告患有呼吸道感染,其中19人(42.2%)服用了一类或几类现代医学,例如止痛药,抗生素;16(35.6%)使用中医干预措施;而7名受访者将中医与现代医学相结合.所有受访者报告使用至少一种行为或医学方法来预防,其中22.3%服用中药,5.3%服用现代药物。没有受访者报告有与COVID-19相关的危急情况。
    结论:我们发现了广泛使用感染控制行为的证据,现代药物和中医治疗和预防COVID-19和其他呼吸道症状。有必要进行更大规模的研究,包括一个更具代表性的样本,探索临床指南中推荐的中药制剂。
    BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate use of infection control behaviours, preventative and therapeutic interventions, and outcomes among respondents to an online survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.
    METHODS: The survey was designed by an international team, translated and adapted to simplified Chinese, including 132 kinds of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) preparation recommended by guidelines. It was distributed and collected from February to May 2021, with data analysed by WPS spreadsheet and wjx.cn. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographics and clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatments, preventative behaviours and interventions, and their associated outcomes.
    RESULTS: The survey was accessed 503 times with 341 (67.8%) completions covering 23 provinces and four municipalities in China. Most (282/341, 82.7%) respondents reported no symptoms during the pandemic and the majority (290/341, 85.0%) reported having a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test at some point. Forty-five (13.2%) reported having a respiratory infection, among which 19 (42.2%) took one or more categories of modern medicine, e.g. painkillers, antibiotics; 16 (35.6%) used TCM interventions(s); while seven respondents combined TCM with modern medicine. All respondents reported using at least one behavioural or medical approach to prevention, with 22.3% taking TCM and 5.3% taking modern medicines. No respondents reported having a critical condition related to COVID-19.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of widespread use of infection control behaviours, modern medicines and TCM for treatment and prevention of COVID-19 and other respiratory symptoms. Larger scale studies are warranted, including a more representative sample exploring TCM preparations recommended in clinical guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号