respiratory symptoms

呼吸道症状
  • 文章类型: Consensus Development Conference
    目的:对最适当的早期诊断策略缺乏共识,COPD患者早期获得治疗和随访的标准。
    方法:一个Delphi共识项目调查了COPD的早期管理。我们制定了两份问卷,由意大利的肺炎学家完成。
    结果:在2016年11月至2017年10月期间,共有207名专家完成了问卷1和184名问卷2。93.2%的专家认为COPD的早期诊断并不常见。无论“早期诊断”的定义如何-大多数响应者(60.4%)在疾病临床表现之前做出的诊断-专家对早期疾病管理的积极作用充满信心,他们认为这对改变疾病的自然史是有效的。78%的受访者认为缺乏对这种疾病的认识是早期COPD管理的第一个限制因素。减少功能下降的最有效措施被认为是戒烟,其次是长效β2激动剂(LABA)/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA),LAMA,LABA,最后吸入皮质类固醇/LABA(每次配对比较P<0.01)。专家认为,全科医生在没有专家参与的情况下进行COPD的早期诊断和治疗“不合适”。
    结论:COPD的早期治疗并不常见,尽管早期疾病管理对长期结果的影响数据有限,意大利专家对这种方法的临床疗效充满信心。
    OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of consensus on the most appropriate early diagnostic strategy, criteria for early access to treatment and follow-up approach for patients with COPD.
    METHODS: A Delphi consensus project investigated the early management of COPD. We formulated two questionnaires for completion by pneumologists in Italy.
    RESULTS: A total of 207 specialists completed questionnaire 1 and 184 of them questionnaire 2, between November 2016 and October 2017. Early diagnosis of COPD was considered uncommon for 93.2% of the expert panel. Regardless of the definition of \"early diagnosis\" - a diagnosis made before the clinical manifestation of the disease for most responders (60.4%) - experts were confident of the positive effects of early disease management, which they consider is effective in modifying the natural history of the disease. Lack of awareness of the disease was considered the first limiting factor to early COPD management for 78% of respondents. The most effective steps to reduce functional decline were considered to be smoking cessation, followed by long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), LAMA, LABA, and finally inhaled corticosteroid/LABA (P<0.01 for each paired comparison). Specialists considered it \"inappropriate\" for general practitioners to perform both the early diagnosis and therapy of COPD without the involvement of a specialist.
    CONCLUSIONS: Early management of COPD is uncommon, and although data on the effects of early disease management on long-term outcomes are limited, Italian experts are confident of the clinical efficacy of this approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Episodic breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom in patients with advanced disease. Still, it is not yet clearly defined.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to develop an international definition, categorization, and terminology of episodic breathlessness.
    METHODS: An online Delphi survey was conducted with international breathlessness experts. We used a structured questionnaire to identify specific aspects and reach agreement on a definition, categorization, and terminology (five-point Likert scale). Consensus was defined in advance as ≥70% agreement.
    RESULTS: Thirty-one of 68 (45.6%), 29 of 67 (43.3%), and 33 of 67 (49.3%) experts responded in the first, second, and third rounds, respectively. Participants were 20-79 years old, about 60% male, and more than 75% rated their own breathlessness expertise as moderate to high. After three rounds, consensus was reached on a definition, categorization, and terminology (84.4%, 96.3%, and 92.9% agreement). The final definition includes general and qualitative aspects of the symptom, for example, time-limited severe worsening of intensity or unpleasantness of breathlessness in the patient\'s perception. Categories are predictable or unpredictable, depending on whether any triggers can be identified.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is high agreement on clinical and operational aspects of episodic breathlessness in advanced disease among international experts. The consented definition and categorization may serve as a catalyst for clinical and basic research to improve symptom control and patients\' quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号