psychosocial intervention

心理社会干预
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    心理社会干预对于治疗酒精使用障碍(AUD)至关重要,但是没有关于其有效性的全面证据。因此,本研究旨在确定心理社会干预对青少年和青少年AUD治疗的有效性.
    在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,文章是从EMBASE搜索的,PubMed,Medline,CINAHL,WebofScience,PsycINFO,还有Scopus.此外,文章从灰色文献中检索。已使用Cochrane偏差风险评估来评估文章的质量。
    共纳入12项随机对照试验。综合家庭和CBT,CBT,引导自我改变,基于生态的家庭治疗在减少酒精使用频率方面效果温和。另一方面,综合动机增强疗法和CBT(-0.71[95%CI:-0.97,-0.45])和常见元素治疗方法(4.5[95%CI:6.9,2.2])在减少酒精使用频率和数量方面具有最高的效果,分别。总之,大多数干预措施对不同的饮酒结局没有显著影响.尽管如此,综合干预措施的有效性超过了单一干预措施.心理社会干预对禁欲的影响尚无定论。因此,未来的研究将探索替代方案,新出现的第三波治疗方法。
    PROSPERO,CRD42023435011,https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?RecordID=435011。
    UNASSIGNED: Psychosocial intervention is imperative for treating alcohol use disorder (AUD), but there is no comprehensive evidence regarding its effectiveness. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in treating AUD amongadolescents and young adults.
    UNASSIGNED: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, articles were searched from EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Also, articles were retrieved from gray literature. The quality of articles has been assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 12 randomized controlled trials were included. Integrated family and CBT, CBT, guided self-change, and ecologically based family therapy had a mild effect in reducing alcohol use frequency. On the other hand, integrated motivational enhancement therapy and CBT (-0.71 [95% CI: -0.97, -0.45]) and common elements treatment approaches (4.5 [95% CI: 6.9, 2.2]) had the highest effect size for reducing alcohol use frequency and amount, respectively. In conclusion, most of the interventions had no significant effect on different drinking outcomes. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of combined interventions surpassed that of the single interventions. The effect of psychosocial interventions on abstinence was inconclusive. Therefore, future studies will explore alternative, newly emerged third-wave therapeutic approaches.
    UNASSIGNED: PROSPERO, CRD42023435011, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=435011.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价积极心理干预对生活质量的影响。癌症患者的积极心理结果和消极心理结果。
    背景:癌症患者经常患有各种心理问题,生活质量差。积极的心理干预越来越多地应用于癌症患者,但是这些研究的结果还没有综合。
    方法:根据PRISMA对随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:从开始到2022年12月,共检索了6个英文数据库和4个中文数据库。两名审阅者使用Cochrane偏差风险工具独立评估偏差风险。RevMan用于荟萃分析。
    结果:29项随机对照试验研究了积极心理干预的效果,包括意义疗法,尊严疗法,积极的心理治疗,基于正念的干预,生活回顾,富有表现力的写作干预,接受和承诺心理治疗,注意和解释疗法,对癌症患者的同情训练和精神治疗。积极的心理干预显著提高了生活质量,增强积极的心理结果,包括幸福感,生命的意义,自尊,乐观,韧性和自我效能感,以及减轻包括抑郁在内的负面心理后果,焦虑和绝望。然而,一些结果的异质性相当高,由于干预措施的广泛多样性。
    结论:积极的心理干预对改善生活质量有潜在的积极作用。增强癌症患者的积极心理结果和减轻消极心理结果。然而,由于异质性和缺乏后续研究,需要更多高质量的研究来证实我们的综述结果,并阐明积极心理干预的长期效果.
    结论:作为可行的心理干预措施,医疗保健专业人员可以根据癌症患者的病情考虑采取适当的积极心理干预措施。
    没有患者或公众捐款。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of positive psychological interventions on quality of life, positive psychological outcomes and negative psychological outcomes in patients with cancer.
    BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer often suffer from various psychological problems and have a poor quality of life. Positive psychological interventions have been increasingly applied to patients with cancer, but the results of these studies have not been synthesized.
    METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials according to PRISMA.
    METHODS: Six English databases and four Chinese databases were searched from the inception to December 2022. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RevMan was used for meta-analysis.
    RESULTS: Twenty-nine randomized controlled trials examined the effects of positive psychological interventions including meaning therapy, dignity therapy, positive psychotherapy, mindfulness- based intervention, life review, expressive writing intervention, acceptance and commitment psychotherapy, attention and interpretation therapy, compassion training and spiritual therapy on patients with cancer. Positive psychological interventions significantly improved the quality of life, enhanced positive psychological outcomes including well-being, meaning of life, self-esteem, optimism, resilience and self-efficacy and alleviated negative psychological outcomes including depression, anxiety and hopelessness. However, the heterogeneity of some outcomes was rather high, due to the wide diversity of the interventions included.
    CONCLUSIONS: Positive psychological interventions have potentially positive effects on improving quality of life, enhancing positive psychological outcomes and alleviating negative psychological outcomes in patients with cancer. However, due to the heterogeneity and the lack of follow-up studies, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm the results of our review and to clarify the long-term effects of positive psychological interventions.
    CONCLUSIONS: As feasible psychological interventions, healthcare professionals can consider applying appropriate positive psychological interventions according to the condition of cancer patients.
    UNASSIGNED: No patient or public contribution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抑郁症是全球残疾的主要原因,但其潜在因素,特别是微生物协会,知之甚少。
    我们研究了在沉浸式心理社会干预期间,在抑郁症的背景下,微生物组和免疫系统之间的纵向相互作用。从52个特征明确的参与者那里收集了142个多组学样本,during,以及为期9天的基于调查的减压计划三个月后。
    我们发现抑郁症与推定致病菌的存在增加和微生物β-多样性降低有关。干预之后,我们观察到神经炎症细胞因子的减少和若干心理健康指标的改善.有趣的是,普雷沃氏菌为主的微生物组的参与者在抑郁时表现出轻微的症状,随着更有弹性的微生物组和更有利的炎症细胞因子谱,包括降低的CXCL-1水平。
    我们的发现揭示了普雷沃氏菌为主的微生物组和抑郁症之间的保护性联系,与较少的炎症环境和缓解症状相关。这些见解,再加上观察到的干预措施改善了神经炎症标志物和心理健康,强调在抑郁症管理中微生物组靶向治疗的潜在途径。
    UNASSIGNED: Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide yet its underlying factors, particularly microbial associations, are poorly understood.
    UNASSIGNED: We examined the longitudinal interplay between the microbiome and immune system in the context of depression during an immersive psychosocial intervention. 142 multi-omics samples were collected from 52 well-characterized participants before, during, and three months after a nine-day inquiry-based stress reduction program.
    UNASSIGNED: We found that depression was associated with both an increased presence of putatively pathogenic bacteria and reduced microbial beta-diversity. Following the intervention, we observed reductions in neuroinflammatory cytokines and improvements in several mental health indicators. Interestingly, participants with a Prevotella-dominant microbiome showed milder symptoms when depressed, along with a more resilient microbiome and more favorable inflammatory cytokine profile, including reduced levels of CXCL-1.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings reveal a protective link between the Prevotella-dominant microbiome and depression, associated with a less inflammatory environment and moderated symptoms. These insights, coupled with observed improvements in neuroinflammatory markers and mental health from the intervention, highlight potential avenues for microbiome-targeted therapies in depression management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高血压和抑郁症往往并存,导致不良的健康结果和医疗管理的重大挑战。由于卫生专业人员没有指南或共识来管理这种合并症,在当前文献中确定干预措施对于获得清晰的证据以及为未来的研究方向和临床实践提供信息至关重要.本范围审查旨在通过系统地绘制潜在干预措施的范围来解决这一差距,以管理高血压和抑郁症的合并症。
    方法:遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围审查指南,这项审查将全面搜索数据库,包括PUBMED,Embase,PsycINFO,CINAHL,Cochrane图书馆数据库,中国生物医学文献数据库与中国国家知识基础设施.灰色文献将来自谷歌学者。2004年1月至2023年12月的年度限制将仅用于检索最新的英文和中文同行评审文章。两名评审员将单独筛选,该过程将记录在系统评审的首选报告项目和范围评审的荟萃分析中。这篇综述将探讨一系列非药物和多组分干预措施,包括社会心理支持,教育方案,远程医疗和综合医疗模式。数据提取将遵循干预描述和复制清单模板,以确保干预组件的详细和标准化报告。研究结果的综合将采用定量和定性方法,以全面概述干预情况。
    背景:本范围审查,涉及对公开来源的二次数据分析,不需要道德批准。调查结果将通过同行评审的出版物和相关会议的介绍传播。
    背景:2024年1月29日开放科学中心的开放科学框架注册表(osf.io/j7gt8)。
    BACKGROUND: Hypertension and depression often coexisted, leading to poor health outcome and significant challenges in healthcare management. Since no guidelines or consensus are available for health professionals to manage this comorbidity, identifying interventions in current literature is crucial for gaining a clear picture of evidence and informing future research directions and clinical practice. This scoping review is designed to address this gap by systematically mapping the range of potential interventions for managing comorbid hypertension and depression.
    METHODS: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping review, this review will comprehensively search databases including PUBMED, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library Databases, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure. Grey literature will be sourced from Google Scholar. A year limit of January 2004-December 2023 will be applied to retrieve the most current peer-reviewed articles in English and Chinese language only. Two reviewers will individually screen and the process will be documented in Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for scoping reviews. This review will explore a range of non-pharmacological and multicomponent interventions including psychosocial support, educational programmes, telemedicine and integrated healthcare models. Data extraction will follow the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist to ensure detailed and standardised reporting of intervention components. The synthesis of findings will employ both quantitative and qualitative methods to provide a comprehensive overview of the intervention landscape.
    BACKGROUND: This scoping review, which involves secondary data analysis of publicly available sources, does not require ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant conferences.
    BACKGROUND: Open Science Framework registry (osf.io/j7gt8) in Centre for Open Science on 29 January 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨产后妇女妊娠相关并发症与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)之间的关系。然后总结妊娠相关PTSD或亚PTSD的有效心理干预措施。
    方法:在PubMed,Embase,科克伦,ISIWebofScience,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),和万方数据库使用“应激障碍”的主题词,创伤后\",\"孕妇\",和“心理治疗”。为了确保尽可能多的相关研究被纳入,免费条款,如产前,产后,围产期和妊娠期也被使用。7月1日发表的干预研究和相关案例,2023年,也进行了搜索。
    结果:本综述包括21篇文章(包括3,901名母亲)。证据表明,典型的心理干预措施表现出巨大的效果,和家庭支持计划,同行支持,在线瑜伽,和音乐疗法在降低风险和改善被研究人群的心理健康方面也是有效的。
    结论:胎儿异常,流产,早产,低出生体重婴儿,高血压,先兆子痫,HELLP综合征,妊娠剧吐与PTSD的风险增加有关。此外,高危孕妇可从认知行为疗法(CBT)等心理干预中获益.对于音乐疗法和暴露疗法来说,减轻母亲PTSD的强度也可能是可行且广为接受的。
    OBJECTIVE: This scoping review sought to investigate the association between pregnancy-related complications and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among postpartum women, then summarize effective psychological interventions for pregnancy-related PTSD or sub-PTSD.
    METHODS: Publications in English and Chinese were searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ISI Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang databases using the subject headings of \"Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic\", \"Pregnant Women\", and \"psychotherapy\". To ensure that as many relevant studies are incorporated as possible, free terms such as prenatal, postnatal, perinatal and gestation were also used. Intervention studies and related cases published by July 1st, 2023, were also searched.
    RESULTS: Twenty-one articles (including 3,901 mothers) were included in this review. Evidence showed that typical psychological interventions exhibited great effect, and family support programs, peer support, online yoga, and music therapy were also effective in reducing risk and improving the psychological well-being of the studied population.
    CONCLUSIONS: Fetal abnormalities, miscarriage, premature birth, infants with low birth weights, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, and hyperemesis gravidarum are associated with an increased risk of PTSD. Moreover, high-risk pregnant women may benefit from psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). It may also be feasible and well-accepted for music therapy and exposure therapy to lessen the intensity of PTSD in mothers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抑郁症是一个主要的全球性健康问题,中国老年人群抑郁症状患病率较高,尤其是在农村地区。由于缺乏专业的心理健康培训和基层医务人员心理治疗能力不足,患有抑郁症状的农村老年人在接受及时诊断和治疗方面经常遇到挑战。在这个景观中,改良的行为激活治疗(MBAT)由于其实用性而成为一种有前途的方法,治疗师培训和应用的简易性,患者可接受性,和广泛的适用性。然而,MBAT的现有证据主要来自发达国家,在中国农村地区的适应和实施方面留下了差距。本研究旨在为基层医务人员制定MBAT培训计划,以管理农村老年人的抑郁症状并评估其有效性。
    方法:将在冷水江和涟源的10个随机选择的乡镇卫生院进行整群随机对照试验,湖南省。我们的目标是招募150名参与者,每组选择5个乡镇医院,每人由15名参与者组成。干预小组将实施MBAT培训计划,而对照组将接受常规护理培训计划。抑郁症状,社会心理功能,生活质量和满意度将在基线测量,立即干预后,干预后3个月和6个月。有效性将使用线性或广义线性混合模型进行评估。
    背景:本研究已获得湘雅三医院机构审查委员会的批准,中南大学(编号::2022-S261)。结果将通过在国际同行评审期刊上发表和在国家和国际会议上的演讲来传播。
    背景:ChiCTR2300074544。
    BACKGROUND: Depression is a major global health problem, with high prevalence rates of depressive symptoms observed among the elderly population in China, particularly exacerbating in rural areas. Due to a lack of professional mental health training and inadequate psychotherapy capacity within primary medical staff, rural elderly individuals grappling with depressive symptoms often encounter challenges in receiving timely diagnosis and treatment. In this landscape, the modified behavioural activation treatment (MBAT) emerges as a promising approach due to its practicality, ease of therapist training and application, patient acceptability, and broad applicability. However, existing evidence for MBAT mainly hails from developed countries, leaving a gap in its adaptation and implementation within rural China. This study aims to develop an MBAT training programme for primary medical staff to manage depressive symptoms among rural elderly and evaluate its effectiveness.
    METHODS: A cluster randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 10 randomly selected township hospitals in Lengshuijiang and Lianyuan, Hunan Province. We aim to recruit 150 participants, with 5 township hospitals selected for each group, each consisting of 15 participants. The intervention group will implement the MBAT training programme, while the control group will receive usual care training programme. Depressive symptoms, psychosocial functioning, quality of life and satisfaction will be measured at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3 and 6 months post-intervention. Effectiveness will be assessed using linear or generalised linear mixed models.
    BACKGROUND: This study has obtained approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Centre South University (No.: 2022-S261). Results will be disseminated through publication in international peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences.
    BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2300074544.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿童和青少年,在自然和人为灾难之后,经常表现出各种心理,情感,和行为问题,显示一系列与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和抑郁症相关的临床症状。这篇综述使用网络荟萃分析(NMA)方法对暴露于自然和人为灾难后的儿童和青少年的PTSD和抑郁症的心理干预措施进行比较和排名。
    方法:确定了对暴露于自然和人为灾难的儿童和青少年的PTSD和抑郁症进行心理社会干预的随机研究。结果是干预后和1-12个月随访时的PTSD和抑郁症状。合并干预后和随访时干预对之间的标准化平均差异(SMD)。计算了95%可信区间(CI)的平均效应大小,并使用累积排序曲线下的表面估计所有干预措施的排序概率。使用Cochrane用于随机试验的偏倚风险工具(RoB2)的第2版评估研究质量。
    结果:总计,该NMA包括26项研究,包括4331名参与者。眼动脱敏和再处理治疗(EMDR)(SMD=-0.67;95%CI-1.17至-0.17),暴露疗法(ET)(SMD=-0.66;95%CI-1.11至-0.22),和认知行为疗法(CBT)(SMD=-0.62;95%CI-0.90至-0.34)在干预后对PTSD的疗效明显高于非活动干预。EMDR(SMD=-0.72;95%CI-1.11至-0.33)和ET(SMD=-0.62;95%CI-0.97至-0.27)与随访时PTSD症状的减少有关。干预后EMDR(SMD=-0.40;95%CI-0.78至-0.03)和游戏疗法(PT)(SMD=-0.37;95%CI-0.62至-0.12)对抑郁症的疗效明显高于非活动干预。对于所有在随访时减少抑郁症状的心理干预,与不活动干预相比,差异不显著。
    结论:EMDR似乎在减少遭受自然和人为灾害的儿童和青少年的PTSD和抑郁症方面最有效。此外,ET和CBT在干预后可能有效减少PTSD症状,而PT在治疗终点时有利于控制抑郁症状。
    BACKGROUND: Children and adolescents, after natural and man-made disasters, often exhibit various psychological, emotional, and behavioral issues, showing a range of clinical symptoms related to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. This review used a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach to compare and rank psychological interventions for PTSD and depression in children and adolescents after exposure to natural and man-made disasters.
    METHODS: Randomized studies of psychosocial interventions for PTSD and depression in children and adolescents exposed to natural and man-made disasters were identified. PTSD and depression symptoms at postintervention and 1-12 month follow-up are the outcomes. The standardized mean differences (SMDs) between pairs of interventions at postintervention and follow-up were pooled. Mean effect sizes with 95% credible intervals (CI) were calculated, and the ranking probabilities for all interventions were estimated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Study quality was assessed with version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2).
    RESULTS: In total, 26 studies with 4331 participants were included in this NMA. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy (EMDR) (SMD = - 0.67; 95% CI - 1.17 to - 0.17), exposure therapy (ET) (SMD = - 0.66; 95% CI - 1.11 to - 0.22), and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (SMD = - 0.62; 95% CI - 0.90 to - 0.34) were significantly more effective for PTSD at postintervention than inactive intervention. EMDR (SMD = - 0.72; 95% CI - 1.11 to - 0.33) and ET (SMD = - 0.62; 95% CI - 0.97 to - 0.27) were associated with a higher reduction in PTSD symptoms at follow-up than inactive intervention. EMDR (SMD = - 0.40; 95% CI - 0.78 to - 0.03) and play therapy (PT) (SMD = - 0.37; 95% CI - 0.62 to - 0.12) were significantly more effective for depression at postintervention than inactive intervention. For all psychological interventions in reducing depression symptoms at follow-up compared with inactive intervention, the differences were not significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: EMDR appears to be most effective in reducing PTSD and depression in children and adolescents exposed to natural and man-made disasters. In addition, ET and CBT are potentially effective in reducing PTSD symptoms at postintervention, while PT is beneficial in managing depression symptoms at the treatment endpoint.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    宫颈癌患者常见的心理支持护理需求,需要采取多种干预措施来增强心理健康并减轻身体症状。本系统综述,涵盖1999年1月至2023年4月的英文发表的文章,评估了心理支持护理干预对焦虑和抑郁的影响。二十六项研究,包括11,638名患者,被分析,包括随机对照试验;准实验性,和PubMed的测试前设计;科学直接;威利在线图书馆;谷歌学者;Cochrane图书馆;和JSTOR。数据的提取由两名独立作者完成,第三名独立作者检查数据提取。系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目,2020年通过。人口,干预,比较器,并应用结果(PICO)搜索策略。有效的公共卫生实践项目(EPHPP)工具用于评估选定文章的质量。各种干预措施,比如心理护理,锻炼,咨询,心理治疗方法,同伴和家庭教育,心理治疗,和药物,已确定。两项研究结合了家庭作业,主要由护理人员管理。抑郁自评量表(SDS)和焦虑自评量表(SAS)是常用的工具。统计分析显示,在所有研究中干预后,治疗组和对照组之间的焦虑和抑郁评分存在显着差异(p<0.005)。随后对八项同质研究进行了荟萃分析,利用随机效应模型,显示中等至高的总体效应大小(1.35,95%CI:0.75至1.94),表明具有统计学意义的积极影响。各种研究显示效果大小从低到高的可变性。虽然荟萃分析包括936名参与者,森林地块在视觉上表示单个研究效果大小和组合效果大小。初步证据支持心理支持护理干预对宫颈癌预后的积极影响,敦促进一步研究,特别是探索长期效应和采用严格的研究设计。
    Cervical cancer patients commonly experience psychological supportive care needs, necessitating diverse interventions to enhance psychological well-being and alleviate physical symptoms. This systematic review, covering English-published articles from January 1999 to April 2023, assessed the impact of psychological supportive care interventions on anxiety and depression. Twenty-Six studies, including 11,638 patients, were analyzed, comprising randomized controlled trials; quasi-experimental, and pre-post-test designs from PubMed; Science Direct; Wiley online library; Google Scholar; Cochrane Library; and JSTOR. The extraction of data was done by two independent authors and a third independent author checked the data extraction. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), 2020 statement was adopted. The population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) search strategy was applied. Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool was used to assess the quality of selected articles. Various interventions, such as psychological nursing, exercise, counselling, psycho-curative approaches, peer and family education, psychotherapy, and medication, were identified. Two studies incorporated homework sessions, predominantly administered by nursing staff. Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) were commonly used instruments. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in anxiety and depression scores between treatment and control groups (p < 0.005) post-intervention across all studies. A subsequent meta-analysis of eight homogeneous studies, utilizing a random-effects model, showed a moderate-to-high overall effect size (1.35, 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.94), indicating a statistically significant positive impact. Various studies exhibited variability in effect sizes ranging from low to high. While the meta-analysis included 936 participants, the forest plot visually represents individual study effect sizes and the combined effect size. Preliminary evidence supports the positive impact of psychological supportive care interventions on cervical cancer outcomes, urging further research, especially exploring long-term effects and employing rigorous study designs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多研究表明,心理干预措施可有效缓解癌症患者的焦虑和抑郁情绪。然而,如何进行最佳的心理干预以减轻癌症患者的焦虑和抑郁情绪,目前尚不清楚.本研究旨在对癌症患者焦虑和抑郁的各种心理干预措施的比较效果进行比较和排名。
    方法:数据库,即PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,PsycINFO,CNKI,万方,从成立日期到2023年12月,对VIP和CBM进行了系统搜索,以进行针对癌症患者焦虑和抑郁的心理干预的随机对照试验。利用CochraneReviewManager5.4,我们根据Cochrane手册5.1.0方法学质量评估标准评估了当前研究中包含的研究中的偏倚风险。使用STATA15.0进行NMA。这项研究不涉及人类参与者,因此不需要伦理批准。
    结果:纳入了31项随机对照试验,涉及3471名参与者。MT[SMD=1.35,95%CI(0.76,1.93)]和认知行为疗法(CBT)[SMD=0.97,95%CI(0.53,1.42)]在缓解焦虑方面优于常规护理。此外,人际心理治疗(IPT)[SMD=1.17,95%CI(0.06,2.28)],CBT[SMD=0.97,95%CI(0.63,1.30)],MT[SMD=0.93,95%CI(0.35,1.50)]在缓解抑郁症方面优于常规治疗。此外,CBT在缓解抑郁方面优于家庭治疗[SMD=0.73,95%CI(0.08,1.38)]。MT,CBT,IPT在缓解焦虑方面排名前三,而IPT,CBT,MT在缓解抑郁症方面排名前三位。
    结论:MT和IPT将是减轻癌症患者焦虑和抑郁的更合适的选择,分别。这项研究还表明,CBT在缓解癌症患者的负面情绪方面具有显着作用。然而,结果需要通过高质量和大样本研究来验证.
    BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have demonstrated that psychological interventions are effective in alleviating anxiety and depression in patients with cancer. However, the optimal psychological intervention to alleviate anxiety and depression in patients with cancer remains unknown. This study was carried out to compare and rank the comparative effectiveness of various psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in patients with cancer.
    METHODS: Databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CNKI, WanFang, VIP and CBM were systematically searched from their inception dates to December 2023 for randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions for anxiety and depression in patients with cancer. Utilizing the Cochrane Review Manager 5.4, we evaluated the risk of bias in the studies included in the current study based on the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 Methodological Quality Evaluation Criteria. The NMA was conducted using STATA 15.0. This study did not involve human participants and therefore did not require ethical approval.
    RESULTS: Thirty-one randomized controlled trials involving 3471 participants were included. MT [SMD = 1.35, 95% CI (0.76, 1.93)] and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) [SMD = 0.97, 95% CI (0.53, 1.42)] were superior to usual care in alleviating anxiety. Besides, interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) [SMD = 1.17, 95% CI (0.06, 2.28)], CBT [SMD = 0.97, 95 % CI (0.63, 1.30)], and MT [SMD = 0.93, 95% CI (0.35, 1.50)] were superior to usual care in alleviating depression. In addition, CBT was superior to family therapy in alleviating depression [SMD = 0.73, 95% CI (0.08, 1.38)]. The MT, CBT, and IPT ranked in the top three in alleviating anxiety, while IPT, CBT, and MT ranked in the top three in alleviating depression.
    CONCLUSIONS: MT and IPT would be a more appropriate option in alleviating anxiety and depression in patients with cancer, respectively. This study also suggested that CBT had a significant effect in alleviating negative emotions in patients with cancer. However, the results need to be validated by high-quality and large-sample studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号