OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine whether there is a correlation between different types of ventricular septal defects (VSD) and chromosomal abnormalities in the low-risk setting of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and to evaluate the prognosis of fetuses with varying types of VSD.
METHODS: Cases of pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis due to fetal VSD were collected by Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology from May 2017 to May 2022. Exclusions were made for those without NIPT, with high-risk NIPT results, genetic disorders, and those lost to follow-up. Data collected included ultrasound classification of VSD, prenatal NIPT results, copy-number variations (CNVs) results, and neonatal outcomes.
RESULTS: The prevalence of pathogenic CNVs was investigated in 74 cases of VSDs. Of these cases, 45 were isolated VSDs (9 muscular and 36 non-muscular) and 29 were non-isolated VSDs (10 with intracardiac and 19 with extra-cardiac structural anomalies). The results revealed that the incidence of pathogenic CNVs was lower in isolated VSDs compared to non-isolated VSDs in a low-risk NIPT condition (χ2 = 9.344, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of pathogenic CNVs between VSDs with intracardiac and extra-cardiac structural anomalies (P = 0.541). Moreover, VSDs associated with intracardiac structural anomalies had the highest rate of surgical intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: When NIPT is low-risk and VSD is isolated, the likelihood of fetal chromosomal defects is not increased. However, if there are intra- or extra-cardiac structural abnormalities present alongside VSD, the possibility of pathogenic CNV is considerably greater, necessitating invasive prenatal diagnosis. Isolated muscular VSDs usually do not require surgery, which can be used as a basis for prenatal counseling regarding fetal VSD.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a quite popular approach for detecting fetal genomic aneuploidies. However, due to the limitations on sequencing read length and coverage, NIPT suffers a bottleneck on further improving performance and conducting earlier detection. The errors mainly come from reference biases and population polymorphism. To break this bottleneck, we proposed NIPT-PG, which enables the NIPT algorithm to learn from population data. A pan-genome model is introduced to incorporate variant and polymorphic loci information from tested population. Subsequently, we proposed a sequence-to-graph alignment method, which considers the read mis-match rates during the mapping process, and an indexing method using hash indexing and adjacency lists to accelerate the read alignment process. Finally, by integrating multi-source aligned read and polymorphic sites across the pan-genome, NIPT-PG obtains a more accurate z-score, thereby improving the accuracy of chromosomal aneuploidy detection. We tested NIPT-PG on two simulated datasets and 745 real-world cell-free DNA sequencing data sets from pregnant women. Results demonstrate that NIPT-PG outperforms the standard z-score test. Furthermore, combining experimental and theoretical analyses, we demonstrate the probably approximately correct learnability of NIPT-PG. In summary, NIPT-PG provides a new perspective for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies detection. NIPT-PG may have broad applications in clinical testing, and its detection results can serve as a reference for false positive samples approaching the critical threshold.

UNASSIGNED: Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy complication defined by new onset hypertension and proteinuria or other maternal organ damage after 20 weeks of gestation. Although non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely used to detect fetal chromosomal abnormalities during pregnancy, its performance in combination with maternal risk factors to screen for PE has not been extensively validated. Our aim was to develop and validate classifiers that predict early- or late-onset PE using the maternal plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) profile and clinical risk factors.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively collected and analyzed NIPT data of 2,727 pregnant women aged 24-45 years from four hospitals in China, which had previously been used to screen for fetal aneuploidy at 12 + 0 ~ 22 + 6 weeks of gestation. According to the diagnostic criteria for PE and the time of diagnosis (34 weeks of gestation), a total of 143 early-, 580 late-onset PE samples and 2,004 healthy controls were included. The wilcoxon rank sum test was used to identify the cfDNA profile for PE prediction. The Fisher\'s exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables of clinical risk factors between PE samples and healthy controls, respectively. Machine learning methods were performed to develop and validate PE classifiers based on the cfDNA profile and clinical risk factors.
UNASSIGNED: By using NIPT data to analyze cfDNA coverages in promoter regions, we found the cfDNA profile, which was differential cfDNA coverages in gene promoter regions between PE and healthy controls, could be used to predict early- and late-onset PE. Maternal age, body mass index, parity, past medical histories and method of conception were significantly differential between PE and healthy pregnant women. With a false positive rate of 10%, the classifiers based on the combination of the cfDNA profile and clinical risk factors predicted early- and late-onset PE in four datasets with an average accuracy of 89 and 80% and an average sensitivity of 63 and 48%, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Incorporating cfDNA profiles in classifiers might reduce performance variations in PE models based only on clinical risk factors, potentially expanding the application of NIPT in PE screening in the future.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to analyze the genetic outcomes of fetuses with nuchal translucency (NT) > 95th centile, and determine whether prenatal genetic counseling, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) are truly beneficial for the outcomes of fetuses with increased NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile.
METHODS: A total of 535 pregnant women were included in this study, with a fetal NT > 95th centile at 11-13+6 weeks of gestation from January 2017 to December 2020. 324 pregnant women with fetal NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile combined with other risk factors and NT > 99th centile received prenatal diagnostic karyotype analysis and CMA, and 211 pregnant women with fetal isolated increased NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile were selected to carry out NIPT.
RESULTS: A total of 211 pregnant women who underwent NIPT were included in the study, NIPT results showed that 8 high-risk cases were confirmed by prenatal diagnosis. Overall, the detection rate of NIPT was 3.79%. A total of 324 pregnant women with fetal NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile, along with other risk factors, and those with fetal NT > 99th centile, received karyotype analysis and CMA for prenatal diagnosis. Among them, a total of 73 genetic abnormalities were detected, including 45 cases of chromosomal aneuploidy, 7 cases of structural abnormalities, and 21 cases of copy number variations (CNVs) with a size of less than 10 Mb. In addition, the 73 women with genetic abnormalities are divided into three groups based on the NT measurement (Group 1: Fetuses with NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile, Group 2: Fetuses with NT > 99th centile, and Group 3: Fetuses with NT > 99th centile). 13.11% (8/61) of pathogenic genetic abnormalities (6 chromosomal aneuploidy, 1 structural abnormality, and 1 likely pathogenic CNV) will be missed if genetic counseling and prenatal genetic testing were not conducted in fetuses with increased NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile combined with other risks. Pathogenic CNVs were the most common abnormalities in group 3, and one likely pathogenic CNV was detected in group 1 and group 3, respectively, and a total of 14 CNVs of unknown clinical significance (VOUS) were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: Through this study, we demonstrated that the critical value of NT > 95th centile for invasive detection or NIPT. Invasive testing combined with CMA may be recommended for fetuses with NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile and with other risks. But when isolated NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile, NIPT would be appropriate.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether non-invasive prenatal testing is an alternative testing option to preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in pregnant patients.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent PGT and invasive or non-invasive pregnancy testing after euploid blastocyst transfer at our IVF centre between January 2017 and December 2022.
RESULTS: In total, 321 patients were enrolled in this study, 138 (43.0%) received invasive pregnancy testing, and 183 (57.0%) patients underwent non-invasive testing. The mean age of the patients in Group 2 was higher than that of the patients in Group 1 (35.64 ± 4.74 vs. 31.04 ± 4.15 years, P < 0.001). The basal LH and AMH levels were higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (4.30 ± 2.68 vs. 3.40 ± 1.88, P = 0.003; 5.55 ± 11.22 vs. 4.09 ± 3.55, P = 0.012), but the clinical outcomes were not significantly different. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing invasive testing were similar to those of patients undergoing non-invasive testing with the same PGT indication.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that non-invasive pregnancy testing is a suitable alternative option for detecting the foetal chromosomal status in a PGT cycle. However, the usefulness of non-invasive testing in PGT-M patients is still limited.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical value of positive copy number variations (CNVs) results by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) without fetal ultrasonography-identified structural anomalies, especially with several known CNVs results.
METHODS: A total of 135,981 results of NIPT performed between April 1, 2017, and March 31, 2020, enrolled in the free NIPT service program implemented by the local government were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 87 cases with positive NIPT screens for CNVs and no fetal ultrasonography-identified anomalies were recalled and provided genetic counseling. After obtaining full informed consent, these cases were provided invasive prenatal diagnosis by karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA)/copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) with follow-up. One case was lost, while 86 cases were successfully followed up.
RESULTS: A total of 44 (50.6%) cases underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis, of which six cases were detected with abnormal karyotype. CMA/CNV-Seq revealed 11 fetuses with positive results for CNVs, among whom eight were consistent with NIPT results, two were partially consistent, one was inconsistent, and positive predictive value (PPV) was 22.7% (10/44). For known CNVs, PPVs were 20% (15q11.2-q13 microdeletion) and 33.3% (5p end deletions). Among 11 pregnant women with positive prenatal diagnosis, seven were confirmed to have pathogenic CNVs in their fetuses; four had CNVs of unknown clinical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in pregnancies without ultrasonography-identified anomalies, a positive NIPT screen for CNVs must be interpreted with caution and validated by additional diagnostic study.

Objective To explore the clinical significance of non-invasive prenatal testing(NIPT)for fetal chromosomal abnormalities in the cases of twin pregnancy and its relationship with age and other related factors.Methods A total of 3733 women with twin pregnancy of 12-26+6 weeks who voluntarily underwent NIPT in the Ningbo Women and Children\'s Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022 were selected.The results of NIPT and amniocentesis were compared and all the participants were followed up.The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities by NIPT was calculated,and its correlations with age,gestational weeks,chorionicity,and pregnancy type were analyzed.Results Among the 3733 cases,71 cases of fetal chromosome abnormality were indicated by NIPT,including 13 cases of trisomy 21,19 cases of trisomy 18,5 cases of trisomy 13,18 cases of sex chromosome abnormality,and 16 cases of chromosome microdeletion/duplication(excluding 21,18,13,and sex chromosomes),among which 34 cases were true positive and 37 cases were false positive.The overall sensitivity,specificity,and positive predictive value(PPV)of NIPT for chromosomal abnormalities in the cases of twin pregnancy were 100%,98.99%,and 47.89%(34/71),respectively.NIPT showed the sensitivity,specificity,and PPV of 100%,99.78%,and 78.38%(29/37)for trisomy 21,18,and 13,100%,99.56%,and 16.67%(3/18)for sex chromosome abnormalities,and 100%,99.62%,and 12.5%(2/16)for chromosome microdeletion/duplication,respectively.In the age group of ≥40 years,the NIPT for chromosomal abnormalities showed the PPV of 66.67%,the sensitivity of 100%,and the misdiagnosis rate of 30%。However,the NIPT for trisomy 21,18,and 13 showed the PPV of 100%,the misdiagnosis rate of 0,and the sensitivity and specificity of 100%.In terms of grouping based on gestational weeks,the NIPT for chromosomal abnormalities showed the highest PPV(51.28%)in the women with twin pregnancy for 14-17+6 weeks,followed by that(50.00%)in the women with twin pregnancy for 22-26+6 weeks;the NIPT for trisomy 21,18,and 13 showed the highest PPV of 94.74% in the gestation group of 14-17+6 weeks,followed by that(83.33%)in the gestation group of 18-21+6 weeks.The rate of dichorionic diamniotic twins was higher in assisted pregnancies than in natural pregnancies,and NIPT showed the same detection efficiency for dichorionic diamniotic twins and monochorionic diamniotic twins and the same detection efficiency for different pregnancy types.Conclusions NIPT has high accuracy in the diagnosis of twin pregnancy and high sensitivity and high specificity for different ages and gestational weeks,especially for trisomy 21,18,and 13.NIPT is suitable for assisted pregnancy and natural pregnancy,and it is of high value in clinical application.However,extensive application needs a large population-based study.
目的 初步探讨无创产前筛查(NIPT)在双胎染色体异常筛查的价值及其与年龄等相关因素的关系。方法 选取2018年1月至2022年12月在宁波市妇女儿童医院自愿接受NIPT检测的3733例(孕12~26+6周)双胎孕妇,回顾其NIPT及羊水穿刺结果,并对所有研究对象进行随访。计算NIPT对染色体异常的检出率,分析其与年龄、孕周、绒毛膜性及受孕类型的相关性。结果 3733例双胎中,NIPT提示胎儿染色体异常的有71例,包括13例T21、19例T18、5例T13、18例性染色体异常及16例染色体微缺失/重复(21、18、13及性染色体除外),其中真阳性34例,假阳性37例。NIPT对双胎染色体异常的总体灵敏度为100%,特异度为98.99%,阳性预测值(PPV)为47.89%(34/71);对T21、18、13总的灵敏度为100%,特异度为99.78%,PPV为78.38%(29/37);对性染色体的灵敏度为100%,特异度为99.56%,PPV为16.67%(3/18);对染色体微缺失/重复的灵敏度为100%,特异度为99.62%,PPV为12.5%(2/16)。以年龄分组,在总染色体中,NIPT在≥40岁组中的PPV达66.67%,灵敏度为100%,但误诊率也达30%;而在T21、18、13中,NIPT在≥40岁组中的PPV达100%,误诊率为0,灵敏度及特异度均为100%。以孕周分组,在总染色体中,孕14~17+6周组的PPV最高(51.28%),其次为孕22~26+6周组(50.00%);在T21、18、13中,孕14~17+6周组最高(94.74%),其次为孕18~21+6周组(83.33%)。双绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎的比率在辅助妊娠中高于自然妊娠,NIPT对双绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎及单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎均有相同的检出效率,对不同受孕类型也具有相同的检出效率。结论 初步发现NIPT在双胎中具有较高的准确性,对不同年龄、孕周都具有高敏感性和高特异性的优点,尤其是T21、18、13。NIPT适用于辅助妊娠及自然受孕,具有较高的临床应用价值,但广泛应用还需大人群基数研究。.

UNASSIGNED: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely adopted as an approach for foetal aneuploidy screening. This study was to evaluate the performance of NIPT for foetal T21 detection in subgroups of pregnancies and the correlation between Z-score and discordant positive predictive values (PPVs).
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively reviewed the NIPT results among 22361 pregnancies undergoing combined second-trimester screening (cSTS) previously. Sixty-four cases with positive NIPT results for foetal T21 were validated by invasive prenatal diagnosis.
UNASSIGNED: In pregnancies with cSTS-T21 low-, intermediate-, and high-risk, the PPVs at NIPT were 14.3%, 64.3%, and 86.4%, respectively. Mean Z-scores of positive NIPT cases with cSTS-T21 high- and intermediate-risk were comparable, while were higher than that of cases with pre-test low-risk. Furthermore, PPVs for positive NIPT cases at 3 < Z < 5, 5 ≤ Z < 9, and Z ≥ 9 were 16.7%, 63.2%, and 100.0%, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: This study suggested that Z-score value of positive cases might be associated with discordant PPVs for T21 screening in subgroups of pregnancies.
Non-invasive prenatal testing has been offered as a primary screening option to high-risk or general pregnancy. However, the accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing in patients with various pre-test risks remained unveiled. The current study revealed that the true positive probability for foetal trisomy 21 screening in pregnancies with prior high-risk was higher than that in pregnancies of intermediate-risk, and both of them were much higher than that of those with pre-test low-risk. The average of Z-score for chromosome 21 of positive non-invasive prenatal testing case in high-risk group was comparable with that of intermediate-risk group, while was higher than that of low-risk group. There was also an upward trend for the true positive probability of foetal trisomy 21 screening with the increase of Z-score. Our study revealed that pre-test risk and Z-score for chromosome 21 were helpful for accurately interpreting the reliability of positive results for foetal trisomy 21.

UNASSIGNED: In the current study, we sought to characterise the methylation haplotypes and nucleosome positioning patterns of placental DNA and plasma cell-free DNA of pregnant women with early-onset preeclampsia using whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) and methylation capture bisulphite sequencing (MCBS) and further develop and examine the diagnostic performance of a generalised linear model (GLM) by incorporating the epigenetic features for early-onset preeclampsia.
UNASSIGNED: This case-control study recruited pregnant women aged at least 18 years who delivered their babies at our Hospital. In addition, non-pregnant women with no previous history of diseases were included. Placental samples of the villous parenchyma were taken at the time of delivery and venous blood was drawn from pregnant women during non-invasive prenatal testing at 12-15 weeks of pregnancy and nonpregnant women during the physical check-up. WGBS and MCBS were carried out of extracted genomic DNA. Then, we established the GLM by incorporating preeclampsia-specific methylation haplotypes and nucleosome positioning patterns and examined the diagnostic performance of the model by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 135 pregnant women and 50 non-pregnant women. Our high-depth MCBS revealed notably different DNA methylation and nucleosome positioning patterns between women with and without preeclampsia. Preeclampsia-specific hypermethylated sites were found predominantly in the promoter regions and particularly enriched in CTCF on the X chromosome. Totally, 2379 preeclampsia-specific methylation haplotypes were found across the entire genome. ROC analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.938 (95%CI 0.877, 1.000). At a GLM cut-off of 0.341, the AUC was the maximum, with a sensitivity of 95.6% and a specificity of 89.7%.
UNASSIGNED: Pregnant women with early-onset preeclampsia exhibit DNA methylation and nucleosome positioning patterns in placental and plasma DNA.
Early-onset preeclampsia is a potentially dangerous condition that can have a profound impact on the health of both the expectant mother and her unborn child. This condition is particularly concerning because it’s challenging to predict who may be affected using conventional methods such as monitoring blood pressure. In our research, we’ve developed an innovative, non-invasive approach to predict the onset of early preeclampsia. We do this by analysing the genetic material of the developing baby, which can be found in the mother’s blood. Our method has shown remarkable accuracy in our testing populations, and its implications are substantial. By providing an early warning system, this breakthrough can benefit pregnant women immensely. It means that early-onset preeclampsia can be identified and addressed well before it becomes a serious health threat. This allows for timely medical interventions and treatments, significantly improving the well-being of both mothers and their precious little ones.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the performance, cost-effectiveness and additional findings of combined detailed ultrasound and biochemical screening for risks of major fetal trisomies in the first-trimester.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis study, we estimated the risk of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 based on maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, nasal bone, ductus venosus pulsatility index velocity, tricuspid regurgitation, fetal heart rate, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A in singleton pregnant women, and performed non-invasive prenatal testing for women with risks of trisomy 21 between 1:500 and 1:300. Invasive diagnostic testing was performed for women with positive or failed non-invasive prenatal testing result and in the high-risk group of this screening method. The direct costs were compared between this strategy and the non-invasive prenatal testing which alone used as first-line screening for all pregnant women.
RESULTS: Among 25,155 singleton pregnant women who underwent screening, 24,361 were available for analysis, of these, 194 cases underwent non-invasive prenatal testing. Among the 24,361 women, 39, 19, and 7 had trisomies 21, 18 and 13, respectively. The use of this strategy could potentially detect approximately 94.87% of trisomy 21 cases, 100% of trisomy 18 cases, and 100% of trisomy 13 cases, with false-positive rates of 2.49%, 0.41%, and 0.49%, respectively. The overall detection rate and overall false-positive rates were 96.92% and 2.52%, respectively. The detection rate was 100% in the advanced age group and 94.12% in the general age group. Additionally, structural abnormalities were detected in 137 fetuses, and 44 fetuses had other chromosomal abnormalities. The total cost of this strategy was $3,730,843.30, and the cost per person tested was $153.15. The total cost of using non-invasive prenatal testing as the first-line strategy would be $6,813,387.04 and the cost per person tested was $279.68.
CONCLUSIONS: Our strategy is an efficient and cost-effective approach for detecting major trisomies and identifying more fetuses with a potential abnormality. Therefore, this strategy is a valuable screening method and highly feasible in the clinical setting.