lie detection

测谎
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:声学测谎,因其隐蔽性和远程处理能力而备受赞誉,激发了人们对可以可靠地帮助测谎的声学特征日益增长的兴趣。在这项研究中,目的是根据各种语音和声学特征而不是皮肤电构造声学测谎仪,心血管,和呼吸值。
    方法:来自中国科学技术大学的62名参与者,18-30岁,参与模拟犯罪实验,并被随机分配到无辜和有罪的群体。我们收集了31个欺骗性和真实性的音频,以分析语音发作时间(VOT)在测谎中的表现。
    结果:我们的发现表明,VOT在测谎方面表现良好。曲线下面积的平均灵敏度和特异性均为0.888,在95%置信水平下,其置信下限和置信上限分别高达0.803和0.973。尽管其他声学特征的参考值较低,他们还提供了测谎判断的总体趋势。
    结论:我们的结果表明,某些声学特征可以有效地用作测谎的辅助手段。通过类似的方法,我们将在未来探索更多有助于检测谎言的声学和语音特征。
    OBJECTIVE: Acoustic lie detection, prized for its covert nature and capability for remote processing, has spurred growing interest in acoustic features that can reliably aid in lie detection. In this study, the aim was to construct an acoustic polygraph based on a variety of phonetic and acoustic features rather than on electrodermal, cardiovascular, and respiratory values.
    METHODS: Sixty-two participants from the University of Science and Technology of China, aged 18-30 years old, were involved in the mock crime experiment and were randomly assigned to the innocent and guilty groups. We collected 31 deceptive and truthful audios to analyze the performance of voice onset time (VOT) in lie detection.
    RESULTS: Our findings revealed that VOT performed well in lie detection. Both the average sensitivity and specificity of the area under the curve are 0.888, and its lower and upper confidence limit are up to 0.803 and 0.973 respectively at the 95% confidence level. Although the other acoustic features had a lower reference value, they also provided a general trend in the judgment of lie detection.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that some acoustic features can be effectively used as aids to lie detection. Through a similar approach, we will explore more acoustic and phonetic features that contribute to detecting lies in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    协同犯罪具有严重的社会危害。在合作犯罪场景中,先前的研究表明,由于协作编码缺陷,加害者的协作编码会损害基于P300的复杂试验协议的检测效率。反馈隐藏信息测试(fCIT),隐藏信息测试的独特变化,为参与者提供反馈,说明他们在记忆中隐藏信息的程度。FCIT,被证明是高效的,使用识别P300以及反馈相关的事件相关电位来检测隐藏信息,并反映了受试者隐瞒的动机。然而,没有研究检查fCIT在识别合作罪犯方面的有效性。我们建议在合作犯罪的情况下,fCIT的效率仍然存在,并使用48位参与者的样本来检验这一假设。协作小组的参与者被指示进行有关盗窃的安静对话,以模拟协作犯罪过程。随后,他们完成了fCIT。研究结果表明,当参与者合作犯罪时,识别P300的检测效率显着下降。然而,反馈P300的检测效率和反馈相关的负性仍然很高。这项研究的结果说明了fCIT检测参与合作犯罪的肇事者的能力。
    Collaborative crime poses severe social hazards. In collaborative crime scenarios, previous studies have indicated that perpetrators\' collaborative encoding can impair the detection efficiency of P300-based complex trial protocols due to the collaborative encoding deficit. The feedback concealed information test (fCIT), a unique variation of the concealed information test, provides participants with feedback on how well they conceal information from memory. The fCIT, which has proven to be highly efficient, detects concealed information using recognition P300 along with feedback-related event-related potentials, and reflects the subject\'s motivation to conceal. However, no studies have examined the fCIT\'s effectiveness in identifying collaborative criminals. We propose that the fCIT\'s efficiency persists in cases of collaborative crime and test this hypothesis using a sample of 48 participants. The participants in the collaborative groups were instructed to have hushed conversations about theft to simulate the collaborative crime process. Subsequently, they completed the fCIT. The findings indicate a significant decline in recognition P300\'s detection efficiency when participants committed crimes collaboratively. Nevertheless, the detection efficiency of feedback P300 and feedback-related negativity remained high. This study\'s outcomes illustrate the capacity of the fCIT to detect perpetrators involved in collaborative crime.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Traditional polygraph techniques mostly rely on the changes of an individual\'s physiological indicators, such as electrodermal activity, heart rate, breath, eye movement and function of neural signals and other indicators. They are easily affected by individual physical conditions, counter-tests, external environment and other aspects, and it is difficult to conduct large-scale screening tests based on the traditional polygraph techniques. The application of keystroke dynamics to polygraph can overcome the shortcomings of the traditional polygraph techniques to a large extend, increase the reliability of polygraph results and promote the validity of legal evidence of polygraph results in forensic practice. This paper introduces keystroke dynamics and its application in deception research. Compared with the traditional polygraph techniques, keystroke dynamics can be used with a relatively wider application range, not only for deception research but also for identity identification, network screening and other large-scale tests. At the same time, the development direction of keystroke dynamics in the field of polygraph is prospected.
    传统的测谎技术大多依赖个体的生理指标,如皮肤电、心率、呼吸、眼动和神经信号功能等指标的变化,容易受个体身体条件、反测试以及外部环境等方面的影响,并且很难进行大面积的筛查测试。将击键动力学应用于测谎可以很大程度上克服传统测谎技术的不足,增加测谎结果的可靠性,促进测谎结论在司法鉴定实践中的法定证据效力。本文介绍了击键动力学及其在欺骗研究中的应用,和传统测谎技术相比,击键动力学除了可以进行欺骗行为研究外,还可用于身份识别、网络筛查等大面积的测试,应用范围相对更广。同时,本文还对击键动力学在测谎领域的发展方向进行了展望。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在基于P300的复杂试验方案(CTP)中,了解犯罪相关信息的无辜受试者通常会被错误分类为“有罪”。因此,有必要制定更严格的CTP,以有效地将有罪者与知识渊博的无辜者区分开来。有时,有罪的人和知识渊博的无辜者拥有相同的物品记忆,但拥有不同的来源记忆。本研究基于三种个体之间来源记忆的差异,设计了一种新颖的项目来源复杂试验方案。要么是与犯罪有关的调查(例如,被盗的戒指)或与犯罪无关的刺激之一(例如,watch,耳环,手镯,或手镯)(项目记忆)出现在每条线索的第一部分,和窃取源词(例如,偷走)或其他来源的单词(例如,提取)(源存储器)在每条线索的第二部分中呈现。结果表明:(1)由项目记忆引起的P300可以有效地将有罪者与无知识的无辜者(AUC=0.76)区分开,但未能有效地将有罪者与有知识的无辜者(AUC=0.60)区分开;(2)在一次测试中,由源记忆引起的晚期阳性成分可以有效地将有罪者与有知识的无辜者(AUC=0.84)区分开。
    Innocent subjects who are knowledgeable of crime-related information will often be misclassified as \"guilty\" in P300-based complex trial protocol (CTP). Therefore, it is necessary to develop a more rigorous CTP that can effectively discriminate the guilty from both the knowledgeable and the unknowledgeable innocents. Sometimes the guilty and the knowledgeable innocents possess the same item memories but different source memories. The present study designed a novel item-source complex trial protocol based on the differences of source memory among the three kinds of individuals. Either the crime-related probe (e.g., the stolen ring) or one of the crime-unrelated stimuli (e.g., watch, earring, bracelet, or bangle) (item memory) was presented in the first part of each trail, and either a stealing-source word (e.g., stole) or other-source word (e.g., fetched) (source memory) was presented in the second part of each trail. The results showed that: (1) the P300 evoked by item memory could effectively discriminated the guilty from the unknowledgeable innocent (AUC = 0.76) but failed to effectively discriminate the guilty from the knowledgeable innocent (AUC = 0.60); (2) the late positive component evoked by source memory could effectively discriminated the guilty from both the knowledgeable innocent (AUC = 0.94) and the unknowledgeable innocent (AUC = 0.84) in one test.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    反馈隐藏信息测试(fCIT)是CIT的一种新形式,为参与者提供关于他们记忆隐藏表现的反馈。fCIT利用事件相关电位(识别-P300和反馈相关的事件相关电位),并且已经显示出在检测信息隐藏方面提供高效率。然而,目前尚不清楚在存在心理对策的情况下,fCIT的表现如何。为了解决这个问题,参与者在fCIT期间接受了使用对策的培训.结果表明,当参与者使用对策时,识别P300效率降低。然而,反馈相关的负性和反馈-P300的效率没有变化,反馈-P300在对策期间仍然显示出高检测效率(AUC=0.86)。这些发现证明了fCIT颠覆对策的潜力。
    The feedback concealed information test (fCIT) is a novel form of the CIT, providing participants with feedback regarding their memory concealment performance. The fCIT utilizes event-related potentials (recognition-P300 and feedback-related event-related potentials) and has been shown to provide high efficiency in detecting information concealment. However, it is unclear how well the fCIT performs in the presence of mental countermeasures. To address this question, participants were trained to use countermeasures during fCIT. Results showed that the recognition-P300 efficiency decreased when participants used countermeasures. However, the efficiencies of feedback-related negativity and feedback-P300 were unchanged, with feedback-P300 still showing a high detection efficiency (AUC = 0.86) during countermeasures. These findings demonstrate the potential of fCIT for subverting countermeasures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,来自与皮肤电导反应(SCR)相关的功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)的脑成像数据,心率(HR),和反应时间(RT)相结合,以确定这些指标的组合是否可以提高隐藏信息测试(CIT)中欺骗检测的效率。在CIT期间,向参与者展示了一系列作为目标的名字和城市,探针,或者无关紧要的刺激。在有罪的群体中,探测刺激是参与者自己的名字和家乡城市,他们被要求否认这些信息。我们的结果表明,探测项目与更长的RT相关,较大的SCR,较慢的HR,和较高的氧合血红蛋白(HbO)浓度变化在下前额叶(IFG),额中回(MFG),和额上回(SFG)与有罪组参与者的无关项目进行比较,而无罪组参与者则没有。此外,我们的结果表明,RT的组合,SCR,HR,与任何单一指标(0.74-0.89)相比,fNIRS指标可以将欺骗检测效率提高到非常高的ROC曲线下面积(0.94)。提高的欺骗检测效率可能归因于随机误差的减少和每个指标反映的心理生理机制的多样性。这些发现证明了一种通过组合使用多个指标来提高欺骗检测效率的可行方法。
    In this study, brain imaging data from functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) associated with skin conductance response (SCR), heart rate (HR), and reaction time (RT) were combined to determine if the combination of these indicators could improve the efficiency of deception detection in concealed information test (CIT). During the CIT, participants were presented with a series of names and cities that served as target, probe, or irrelevant stimuli. In the guilty group, the probe stimuli were the participants\' own names and hometown cities, and they were asked to deny this information. Our results revealed that probe items were associated with longer RT, larger SCR, slower HR, and higher oxyhemoglobin (HbO) concentration changes in the inferior prefrontal gyrus (IFG), middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) compared with irrelevant items for participants in the guilty group but not in the innocent group. Furthermore, our results suggested that the combination of RT, SCR, HR, and fNIRS indicators could improve the deception detection efficiency to a very high area under the ROC curve (0.94) compared with any of the single indicators (0.74-0.89). The improved deception detection efficiency might be attributed to the reduction of random error and the diversiform underlying the psychophysiological mechanisms reflected by each indicator. These findings demonstrate a feasible way to improve the deception detection efficiency by using combined multiple indicators.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在问卷调查中经常发生欺骗,这导致了数据的误报和可靠性差。这项研究的目的是探讨眼动追踪是否有助于在问卷调查中发现欺骗行为,以及指示说谎中出现的眼睛行为是否仍然存在于自发说谎中。进行了两项研究,以探索指导和自发说谎条件下的眼球运动行为。结果表明,瞳孔大小和注视行为都是问卷调查中检测谎言的可靠指标。眨眼和扫视行为似乎并不能预测欺骗。欺骗导致瞳孔增大,固定计数和持续时间。同时,受访者在撒谎和说实话时关注问卷的不同领域。此外,在实际的欺骗情况下,线性支持向量机(SVM)欺骗分类器的准确率为74.09%。总之,这项研究表明,说谎的眼动追踪特征不限于指导欺骗,证明了在问卷调查中使用眼动追踪来检测欺骗的潜力,并有助于敏感问题的问卷调查。
    Deceit often occurs in questionnaire surveys, which leads to the misreporting of data and poor reliability. The purpose of this study is to explore whether eye-tracking could contribute to the detection of deception in questionnaire surveys, and whether the eye behaviors that appeared in instructed lying still exist in spontaneous lying. Two studies were conducted to explore eye movement behaviors in instructed and spontaneous lying conditions. The results showed that pupil size and fixation behaviors are both reliable indicators to detect lies in questionnaire surveys. Blink and saccade behaviors do not seem to predict deception. Deception resulted in increased pupil size, fixation count and duration. Meanwhile, respondents focused on different areas of the questionnaire when lying versus telling the truth. Furthermore, in the actual deception situation, the linear support vector machine (SVM) deception classifier achieved an accuracy of 74.09%. In sum, this study indicates the eye-tracking signatures of lying are not restricted to instructed deception, demonstrates the potential of using eye-tracking to detect deception in questionnaire surveys, and contributes to the questionnaire surveys of sensitive issues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Steganographer检测旨在识别出于社交网络中秘密通信的目的而在许多图像中隐藏秘密信息的有罪用户。现有的隐匿者检测方法专注于设计有区别的特征,但没有探索图像特征之间的关系或基于特征有效地表示用户。在这些方法中,每个图像都被识别为等效图像,将每个用户视为对应用户共享的所有图像的分布。然而,用这种扁平化的方法很难识别有罪用户和无辜用户的细微差别。在本文中,隐匿者检测任务被表述为多实例学习问题,其中每个用户被认为是一个包,和共享映像是包中的多个实例。具体来说,我们提出了一个相似度累积图卷积网络来将每个用户表示为一个完整的加权图,其中每个节点对应于从图像中提取的特征,并且边缘的权重是每对图像之间的相似性。网络中的构造单元可以利用实例之间的关系,以便可以通过相似性累积来增强正实例的公共模式。而不是在固定的原始图形上操作,我们提出了一种基于节点特征的重建和池化图的新策略,以迭代地操作多个卷积。此策略可以有效地解决过度平滑问题,这些问题使节点无法区分,尽管它们共享不同的实例级标签。与最先进的方法和其他代表性的基于图的模型相比,所提出的框架展示了其跨图像域的有效性和可靠性能力,即使在大规模社交媒体场景的背景下。此外,实验结果还表明,所提出的网络可以推广到其他多实例学习问题。
    Steganographer detection aims to identify guilty users who conceal secret information in a number of images for the purpose of covert communication in social networks. Existing steganographer detection methods focus on designing discriminative features but do not explore relationship between image features or effectively represent users based on features. In these methods, each image is recognized as an equivalent, and each user is regarded as the distribution of all images shared by the corresponding user. However, the nuances of guilty users and innocent users are difficult to recognize with this flattened method. In this paper, the steganographer detection task is formulated as a multiple-instance learning problem in which each user is considered to be a bag, and the shared images are multiple instances in the bag. Specifically, we propose a similarity accumulation graph convolutional network to represent each user as a complete weighted graph, in which each node corresponds to features extracted from an image and the weight of an edge is the similarity between each pair of images. The constructed unit in the network can take advantage of the relationships between instances so that common patterns of positive instances can be enhanced via similarity accumulations. Instead of operating on a fixed original graph, we propose a novel strategy for reconstructing and pooling graphs based on node features to iteratively operate multiple convolutions. This strategy can effectively address oversmoothing problems that render nodes indistinguishable although they share different instance-level labels. Compared with the state-of-the-art method and other representative graph-based models, the proposed framework demonstrates its effectiveness and reliability ability across image domains, even in the context of large-scale social media scenarios. Moreover, the experimental results also indicate that the proposed network can be generalized to other multiple-instance learning problems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    反馈隐藏信息测试(fCIT)是aCIT的一种新变体,为参与者提供有关他们在CIT期间的记忆隐藏表现的反馈。先前的研究发现,与fCIT中的反馈处理相关的反馈相关的ERP可以准确地识别隐藏信息。然而,在记忆隐藏过程中,反馈是否会影响识别的过程和ERP标志仍是未知的,如识别P300。为了解决这个问题,本研究直接比较了有和没有反馈的基于识别的P300inCITs。结果表明,在有反馈和没有反馈的情况下,探针比不相关的P300引起更大的识别,两者在识别P300方面没有显著差异。此外,基于识别的P300在两个CITs中的检出率也没有显着差异。与反馈相关的ERP,尤其是反馈P300,继续歧视有罪和无辜的受试者,AUC远高于机会。
    The feedback concealed information test (fCIT) is a novel variant of a CIT, which provides participants with feedback regarding their memory concealment performance during the CIT. Previous studies have found that feedback-related ERPs associated with feedback processing in the fCIT can accurately identify concealed information. However, it is still unknown whether the feedback influences the process and ERP signs of recognition during memory concealment, such as the recognition P300. To address this issue, the present study directly compared the recognition-based P300 in CITs with and without feedback. Results showed that the probe elicited a larger recognition P300 than irrelevants in both CITs with and without feedback, and there were no significant differences in recognition P300 between those two CITs. Moreover, the detection rate for recognition-based P300 in both CITs also had no significant difference. The feedback-related ERPs, especially feedback P300, continued to discriminate guilty and innocent subjects with AUCs well above the chance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Objective To investigate the application value of eye tracking in lie detection. Methods The 40 subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The pupil diameter, fixation duration, points of fixation and blink frequency of the subjects in the experimental group in observing target stimulation and non-target stimulation were recorded with eye tracker after they accomplished the mock crime. The eye movement parameters of subjects in the control group were directly collected. The differences in eye movement parameters of the experimental group and the control group in observing target stimulation and non-target stimulation were analyzed by t-test. Pearson coefficient analysis of correlation between eye movement parameters that had differences was conducted. The effectiveness of eye movement parameters to distinguish between the experimental group and the control group was calculated by the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. Results Participants from the experimental group had shorter average pupil diameter, longer average fixation duration and fewer fixation points (P<0.05), but the differences in blink frequency had no statistical significance. The differences in the above indicators of the control group in observing target stimulation and non-target stimulation had no statistical significance. The average fixation duration showed a negative correlation with fixation points (r=-0.255, P<0.05); the average fixation duration showed a negative correlation with average pupil diameter (r=-0.218, P<0.05); the fixation points showed a positive correlation with average pupil diameter (r=0.09, P<0.05). The area under the curve of average pupil diameter, average fixation duration and fixation points was 0.603, 0.621 and 0.580, respectively. Conclusion The average pupil diameter, average fixation duration and fixation points obtained by the eye tracker under laboratory conditions can be used to detect lies.
    UNASSIGNED: 眼动追踪仪在测谎中的应用.
    UNASSIGNED: 目的 探究眼动追踪在测谎中的应用价值。 方法 使用随机数字法将40名被试分为两组,实验组在实施模拟犯罪后利用眼动追踪仪记录其在观察靶刺激和非靶刺激时的瞳孔直径、注视时间、注视点和眨眼次数,对照组直接采集眼动数据。采用t检验分析实验组和对照组在观察靶刺激与非靶刺激时眼球运动参数的差异,用Pearson相关系数分析存在差异的眼球运动参数之间的相关性,用受试者操作特征(receiver operator characteristic,ROC)曲线估计眼球运动参数甄别实验组与对照组的有效性。 结果 实验组观察靶刺激与非靶刺激时相比,平均瞳孔直径减小、注视时间延长、注视点减少(P<0.05),但眨眼次数的差异无统计学意义。对照组在观察靶刺激和非靶刺激时上述指标的差异均无统计学意义。实验组平均注视时间与注视点呈负相关(r=-0.255,P<0.05),平均注视时间与平均瞳孔直径之间呈负相关(r=-0.218,P<0.05),注视点与平均瞳孔直径之间呈正相关(r=0.09,P<0.05)。平均瞳孔直径、平均注视时间和注视点的曲线下面积分别为0.603、0.621和0.580。 结论 眼动追踪仪所测得的平均瞳孔直径、平均注视时间和注视点在实验室条件下可以用于测谎。.
    UNASSIGNED: 司法精神病学;测谎;眼动;注视,眼;注视点;瞳孔直径.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号