focus group

焦点小组
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:可穿戴监测设备(WMD)的使用,比如智能手表,正在推进对全球社区居住老年人的支持和护理。尽管现有证据表明大规模杀伤性武器在预防问题和促进健康方面的重要性,对一段时间后使用量下降的担忧仍然很大,这需要了解老年人如何体验这些设备。
    目的:本研究旨在探索和描述社区居住的老年人在接受我们的干预计划后的经历,其中包括在社区卫生工作者的支持下使用智能手表,护士,和社会工作者,包括他们在使用该设备时遇到的挑战,感知到的好处,以及促进他们持续使用该设备的策略。
    方法:我们在本研究中使用了定性的描述方法。参加过涉及使用智能手表的介入研究并接受定期健康和社会支持的老年人在试验结束时被邀请参加焦点小组讨论。目的抽样用于招募潜在参与者。同意参加的老年人被分配到基于社区的焦点小组。焦点小组讨论由研究小组的两名成员推动和主持。所有讨论都被记录和逐字抄录。我们使用恒定比较分析方法来分析焦点小组的数据。
    结果:共有22名被分配到6个焦点组的参与者参与了研究。社区居住的老年人的经历是(1)与使用大规模杀伤性武器相关的挑战,(2)使用大规模杀伤性武器的感知收益,(3)促进大规模杀伤性武器使用的战略。此外,研究结果还证明了老年人寻求健康行为的分层模式:首先从老年人志愿者那里寻求帮助,然后从社会工作者那里,最后是护士。
    结论:有可能持续使用大规模杀伤性武器,但重要的是要确保技术支持的可用性,保持护士和社会工作者的积极专业随访,并包括老年人志愿者,以支持其他老年人参与此类计划。
    BACKGROUND: The use of wearable monitoring devices (WMDs), such as smartwatches, is advancing support and care for community-dwelling older adults across the globe. Despite existing evidence of the importance of WMDs in preventing problems and promoting health, significant concerns remain about the decline in use after a period of time, which warrant an understanding of how older adults experience the devices.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore and describe the experiences of community-dwelling older adults after receiving our interventional program, which included the use of a smartwatch with support from a community health workers, nurses, and social workers, including the challenges that they experienced while using the device, the perceived benefits, and strategies to promote their sustained use of the device.
    METHODS: We used a qualitative descriptive approach in this study. Older adults who had taken part in an interventional study involving the use of smartwatches and who were receiving regular health and social support were invited to participate in focus group discussions at the end of the trial. Purposive sampling was used to recruit potential participants. Older adults who agreed to participate were assigned to focus groups based on their community. The focus group discussions were facilitated and moderated by 2 members of the research team. All discussions were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used the constant comparison analytical approach to analyze the focus group data.
    RESULTS: A total of 22 participants assigned to 6 focus groups participated in the study. The experiences of community-dwelling older adults emerged as (1) challenges associated with the use of WMDs, (2) the perceived benefits of using the WMDs, and (3) strategies to promote the use of WMDs. In addition, the findings also demonstrate a hierarchical pattern of health-seeking behaviors by older adults: seeking assistance first from older adult volunteers, then from social workers, and finally from nurses.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing use of the WMDs is potentially possible, but it is important to ensure the availability of technical support, maintain active professional follow-ups by nurses and social workers, and include older adult volunteers to support other older adults in such programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:职业倦怠的患病率,抑郁症,中国护士的焦虑率为34%,55.5%,和41.8%。心理健康问题对他们的个人福祉有重大影响,工作表现,患者护理质量,以及整个医疗系统。心理健康受多个层面的因素及其相互作用的影响。
    方法:这是一项使用现象学方法的描述性定性研究。我们从长沙某三甲医院招募了48名护士,湖南省,中国。数据是通过焦点小组访谈收集的。对音频记录的数据进行转录和感应分析。
    结果:根据社会生态模型确定了具有13个子主题的四个主要主题:(1)个体水平因素,包括人格特质,睡眠质量,工作场所适应性,和多年的工作经验;(2)人际关系因素,包括人际支持和角色冲突;(3)组织层面因素,比如组织氛围,组织支持,职业高原,和工作控制;和(4)社会层面因素,其中包括补偿方案,社会地位,以及立法规定和政策。
    结论:我们的研究提供了对影响护士心理健康的多方面因素的细致理解。认识到个人的相互联系,人际关系,组织,和社会因素对于制定有针对性的干预措施和综合策略以促进和保障临床环境中护士的心理健康至关重要。
    更大的研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册:ChiCTR2300072142(2023年6月5日)https://www。chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=192676。
    本研究是根据报告定性研究的综合标准(COREQ)报告的。
    BACKGROUND: The prevalence of burnout, depression, and anxiety among Chinese nurses was 34%, 55.5%, and 41.8% respectively. Mental health problems have significant impacts on their personal well-being, work performance, patient care quality, and the overall healthcare system. Mental health is influenced by factors at multiple levels and their interactions.
    METHODS: This was a descriptive qualitative study using phenomenological approach. We recruited a total of 48 nurses from a tertiary hospital in Changsha, Hunan Province, China. Data were collected through focus group interviews. Audio-recorded data were transcribed and inductively analysed.
    RESULTS: Four major themes with 13 subthemes were identified according to the social ecological model: (1) individual-level factors, including personality traits, sleep quality, workplace adaptability, and years of work experience; (2) interpersonal-level factors, encompassing interpersonal support and role conflict; (3) organization-level factors, such as organizational climate, organizational support, career plateau, and job control; and (4) social-level factors, which included compensation packages, social status, and legislative provision and policy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted factors influencing nurses\' mental health. Recognizing the interconnectedness of individual, interpersonal, organizational, and social elements is essential for developing targeted interventions and comprehensive strategies to promote and safeguard the mental well-being of nurses in clinical settings.
    UNASSIGNED: The larger study was registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300072142 (05/06/2023) https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=192676 .
    UNASSIGNED: This study is reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:利用中国大陆广泛利用中药(TCM)来对抗COVID-19,专家设计了一系列中医抗疫策略。本研究旨在了解香港CM从业者对中医药防疫计划的应用和看法。\"
    方法:进行在线焦点小组访谈,并采用目的性抽样邀请22名CM从业人员自愿参加三次面试。采访是录音的,然后逐字抄写。使用模板分析对转录物进行分析。
    结果:得出了三个主题:(1)“中医药防疫计划”的促进者,“(2)中医药防疫计划的障碍,“和(3)对改进“中医药防疫计划”的期望。"参加者可从各种来源取得有关资料,其中强调了中药药用烹饪和非药物疗法计划的价值,并指导初级CM从业者,补充西医干预措施,并在诊所管理中草药储备。然而,障碍包括缺乏及时发布信息的专门平台,计划内容有缺陷,对有经验的CM从业者的参考价值有限,对香港缺乏适用性。根据障碍确定了CM从业者对改进计划的期望。
    结论:为加强防疫计划的实施,香港的CM从业者期望利用特定的CM平台,完善计划,确保计划切合实际,专注,全面,并根据当地情况量身定制。
    BACKGROUND: Drawing on the extensive utilization of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to combat COVID-19 in Mainland China, experts designed a series of TCM anti-epidemic strategies. This study aims to understand Hong Kong CM practitioners\' application of and opinions on the \"Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans.\"
    METHODS: Online focus group interviews were conducted, and purposive sampling was employed to invite 22 CM practitioners to voluntarily participate in three interview sessions. The interviews were audio recorded, then transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analyzed using template analysis.
    RESULTS: Three themes were derived: (1) facilitators of the \"Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans,\" (2) barriers of the \"Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans,\" and (3) expectations on improving the \"Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans.\" The participants could obtain relevant information from various sources, which highlights the value of the plans for TCM medicinal cuisine and non-pharmacologic therapies and guiding junior CM practitioners, supplementing Western medicine interventions, and managing Chinese herb reserves in clinics. However, the barriers included the lack of a specialized platform for timely information release, defective plan content, limited reference value to experienced CM practitioners, and lack of applicability to Hong Kong. The expectations of the CM practitioners for improving the plans were identified based on the barriers.
    CONCLUSIONS: To enhance the implementation of the anti-epidemic plans, CM practitioners in Hong Kong expect to utilize a specific CM platform and refine the plans to ensure that they are realistic, focused, comprehensive, and tailored to the local context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:了解治疗负担是有效管理2型糖尿病(T2DM)的关键因素。本研究旨在从患者的角度解决中国初级医疗机构中关于T2DM治疗负担的知识差距。
    方法:叙述性综述为创建先验编码结构以确定T2DM治疗负担的各个方面提供了信息。进行了焦点小组,采用最大变异抽样策略,从城市不同的社会人口统计学背景中选择参与者,郊区,郊区农村,中国的偏远地区。参与者包括在初级保健机构中接受T2DM治疗的成年人,治疗负担问卷评分为25分或更高。演绎主题分析,在编码结构的指导下,促进了T2DM治疗负担概念框架的全面探索和进一步发展。
    结果:四个焦点小组,每个人都有来自不同领域的五名参与者,进行了。利用累积复杂性模型和归一化过程理论作为理论基础,主题分析基于叙事回顾的编码结构完善了概念框架。完善了五个关键主题,包括医疗信息,药物,administration,医疗保健系统,和生活方式。此外,金融和时间/旅行主题合并为一个新的主题,称为“个人资源”,说明它们在框架内的重叠。这些焦点小组的参与者强调了管理医疗信息的挑战,在先前的治疗负担研究中,一个经常被低估的方面。主题分析最终形成了一个最终的概念框架,全面了解中国初级医疗机构中2型糖尿病患者的治疗负担。该框架包括六个关键结构,描述T2DM治疗负担和相关因素,比如前因后果。
    结论:本研究提供了对T2DM治疗负担的见解。最终确定了一个概念框架,以加深对T2DM患者多方面结构和治疗负担性质的理解。此外,它强调需要根据个人能力定制T2DM治疗,考虑他们的个人资源分配和治疗利用。
    BACKGROUND: Understanding treatment burden is a critical element to the effective management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The current study aims to address the knowledge gap surrounding treatment burden of T2DM from the patient\'s perspective in China\'s primary care settings.
    METHODS: A narrative review informed the creation of an a priori coding structure to identify aspects of T2DM treatment burden. Focus groups were conducted, employing a maximum variation sampling strategy to select participants from diverse sociodemographic backgrounds across urban, suburban, rural, and remote areas in China. Participants included adults with T2DM care in primary care settings for over a year and a Treatment Burden Questionnaire score of 25 or higher. Deductive thematic analysis, guided by the coding structure, facilitated a comprehensive exploration and further development of the conceptual framework of T2DM treatment burden.
    RESULTS: Four focus groups, each comprising five participants from diverse areas, were conducted. Utilising the Cumulative Complexity Model and Normalisation Process Theory as theoretical underpinnings, the thematic analysis refined the conceptual framework based on the coding structure from the narrative review. Five key themes were refined, encompassing medical information, medication, administration, healthcare system, and lifestyle. Additionally, the financial and time/travel themes merged into a new theme termed \"personal resources\", illustrating their overlapping within the framework. Participants in these focus groups highlighted challenges in managing medical information, an aspect often underrepresented in prior treatment burden research. The thematic analysis culminated in a finalised conceptual framework, offering a comprehensive understanding of the treatment burden experiences of people with T2DM in China\'s primary care settings. This framework includes six key constructs, delineating T2DM treatment burden and associated factors, such as antecedents and consequences.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into the treatment burden of T2DM. A conceptual framework was finalised to deepen the understanding of the multifaceted constructs and the nature of treatment burden in people with T2DM. Furthermore, it emphasises the need to tailor T2DM treatment to individual capacities, considering their personal resource allocation and treatment utilisation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生态系统服务的陈述偏好评估涉及参与者回答假设性问题以表达偏好。参与者倾向于分别回答假设的问题,没有任何审议(在一个小组内考虑和讨论的过程)。然而,审议研究的一个相对较新的发展涉及要求参与者通过审议陈述偏好。审议是历史上亲自进行的,但现在也可以在线进行。本文涵盖了将在线审议整合到陈述偏好评估中的优势和局限性,包括:(1)既定偏好估值与未经审议的比较,(2)面对面审议和网上审议的比较,(3)在线审议媒体的比较,比如打字,视频会议,和语音通话。进行审议可以扩大参与者对目标生态系统服务和其他服务的偏好的理解。然而,这需要参与者愿意深思熟虑,并增加时间投资。与面对面审议相比,在线审议具有更低的成本和旅行限制以及更高的时间效率和个人信息保密性。然而,能力低或愿意使用网络媒体的人处于不利地位。在线审议媒体的差异可能会降低或提高包容性,订婚,以及影响估值结果的审议方式的开放性。我们还为选择审议媒体和减轻因审议媒体选择而产生的审议偏见提供了建议。进一步的研究应该探索如何提高在线审议的时间效率和负担能力,如何促进包容性,订婚,网上议事的开放性,以及不同的审议媒体如何影响审议质量和评估结果。
    Stated preference valuation of ecosystem services involves participants answering hypothetical questions to express preferences. Participants tend to respond to the hypothetical questions separately, without any deliberation (the process of considering and discussing within a group). However, a relatively recent development in deliberation research involves asking participants to state preferences via deliberation. Deliberation is historically conducted in-person but can now also be done online. This paper covers the strengths and limitations of integrating online deliberation into stated preference valuation, including: (1) comparison between stated preference valuation with and without deliberation, (2) comparison between in-person and online deliberation, and (3) comparison between online deliberation media, such as typing, video meetings, and voice calls. Conducting deliberation can broaden participants\' understanding of the target ecosystem services and others\' preferences. However, this requires participants\' willingness to deliberate and increases time investment. Online deliberation has lower costs and travel restrictions and higher time efficiency and confidentiality of personal information than in-person deliberation. However, people with low abilities or willingness to use online media are disadvantaged. Differences in the online deliberation media may reduce or improve the inclusiveness, engagement, and openness of deliberations in ways that affect valuation results. We also provide suggestions for selecting deliberation media and mitigating deliberation bias derived from the choice of deliberation media. Further research should explore how to improve time efficiency and affordability of online deliberation, how to promote inclusiveness, engagement, and openness of online deliberation, and how different deliberation media affect deliberation quality and valuation results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乳制品行业受到各种地方病和新兴疾病的威胁,并在中国启动了各种控制程序。将更多的证据应用于决策可以帮助提高疾病控制计划的效率;然而,目前缺乏相关的研究文献。本研究的目的是以中国河南省为例,通过半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论,深入了解奶农和动物卫生专家对重点地方病的态度和看法。分别。这项研究涉及2019年12月至2021年1月的24名农民和27名动物健康专家。农民认为对其动物具有重要意义的疾病与参与专家和政府名单认为的优先事项不同。从农民个体的角度来看,牛布鲁氏菌病和结核病等人畜共患疾病风险的影响似乎不如农场一级的“可见”损失那么明显,与专家的意见相反。与会专家认为,农场生物安保措施不力,对控制和根除重点地方病构成了挑战;然而,农民对生物安全原则的理解存在差距,采取此类疾病预防措施的动机低。数据中还出现了控制和根除重点地方病的其他几个挑战,包括缺乏适用于该领域的诊断工具以及区分自然感染和疫苗接种的鉴别诊断工具,缺乏针对单一或多种病原体或新基因型/血清型的有效和市售疫苗,预警和信息网络薄弱,经济补偿不足。全面了解人们对疾病控制的看法将有助于实施包容性和参与性的疾病控制策略,从而提高疾病控制的效率。
    The dairy industry is threatened by a variety of endemic diseases and emerging diseases, and various control programs have been initiated in China. The increased application of evidence to policymaking can help improve the efficiency of disease control programs; however, the relevant research literature is currently lacking. The objective of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the attitudes and perceptions towards priority endemic diseases among dairy farmers and animal health experts by taking Henan province of China as the example and using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, respectively. This study involved 24 farmers and 27 animal health experts from December 2019 to January 2021. The diseases considered by farmers to be of significance to their animals are different from those considered priorities by the participating experts and the government list. From the perspective of the individual farmers, the effects of zoonotic disease risks such as bovine brucellosis and tuberculosis appear to be less pronounced than \"visible\" losses at the farm level, contrary to the opinion of experts. Participating experts believed that poor on-farm biosecurity measures posed challenges to the control and eradication of priority endemic diseases; however, there are gaps in farmers\' understanding of biosecurity principles, and low motivations to take such disease prevention measures. Several other challenges to the control and eradication of priority endemic diseases also emerged in the data, including the lack of diagnostic tools applicable in the field as well as differential diagnostic tools to differentiate natural infection from vaccination, lack of effective and commercially available vaccines against single or multiple pathogen(s) or new genotypes/serotypes, weak early warning and information networks and insufficient economic compensation. A holistic understanding of people\'s perceptions of disease control would facilitate the implementation of inclusive and engaging disease control strategies, thereby increasing the efficiency of disease control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    明确社区卫生护士在慢性病患者延续护理中的功能定位,鼓励社区护士在延伸护理工作中发挥应有的作用。在这项研究中,于2020年5月至7月,对上海社区卫生服务中心工作人员进行了抽样,和代表性的医务人员被选中进行深入访谈和焦点小组讨论。18名社区医务人员参加。社区护士在慢性病患者持续护理中的作用主要有:①承担患者持续治疗的个性化项目,护理与康复;②为患者创造“同伴教育”条件;③为家庭照顾者提供支持性护理;④参与家庭医生团队健康管理全过程。结果提醒护士管理人员,在新任务下,社区护士需要“一个专业和多个能力,\"适宜的护理技术和良好的健康管理技能。社区护士培训应更好地满足慢性病患者的实际需求。
    To clarify the functional orientation of community health nurses in the continuous care of patients with chronic diseases and to encourage community nurses to play their expected roles in extended nursing work. In this study, conducted from May to July 2020, the staff of Shanghai Community Health Service Center were sampled, and representative medical staff were selected for in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Eighteen community medical staff members participated. The functions of community nurses in the continuous care of patients with chronic diseases are mainly as follows: ① undertaking individualized projects for patients\' continuous treatment, nursing and rehabilitation; ② creating \"peer education\" conditions for patients; ③ providing supportive care to family caregivers; and ④ participating in the whole process of family doctor team health management. The results provide a reminder for nurse managers that under the new mission, community nurses need \"one specialty and multiple abilities,\" appropriate nursing technology and good health management skills. The training of community nurses should better meet the practical needs of patients with chronic diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:生活在社区中的六分之一的老年人遭受虐待和忽视。虐待老人对个人有严重后果,家庭,和社会,包括死亡率,身体和心理上的疾病,和增加护理要求。因此,及时和有效地干预虐待老年人应该是一个优先事项。本研究采用定性焦点小组方法来解决以下问题:虐待老年人干预的基本要素是什么?可以做些什么来改善当前的干预措施?
    方法:本次焦点小组研究的32名参与者包括社会工作者,医务社会工作者,和来自七个组织的护士分享了他们的知识和见解。所有会议都在网上进行,录音,逐字抄写。三位具有社会工作和心理学背景的研究人员独立编码了成绩单,并就焦点小组中出现的主题达成了一致。
    结果:根据香港前线帮助专业人士的经验,我们强调了有效干预虐待老年人的关键因素:1)识别和评估;2)基本技能和态度;3)有效干预措施的要素;4)跨学科和机构的协作努力;5)提高专业人员和公众的认识。
    结论:培训可以使一线专业人员掌握必要的技能,以识别虐待老年人的案件并评估虐待风险。有效的干预措施不仅应解决客户的安全和对切实支持的需求,还应尊重他们的自主权和隐私。以客户为中心,基于力量的方法,包括支持性的同伴和解决所涉及的复杂的家庭关系可能是有用的。干预措施还应涉及跨学科和跨机构合作。
    One in six older adults living in communities experience abuse and neglect. Elder abuse has serious consequences for individuals, families, and society, including mortality, physical and psychological morbidities, and increased care requirements. Timely and effective interventions for elder abuse should therefore be a priority. This study used a qualitative focus group approach to address the following questions: What are the essential elements of elder abuse interventions? What can be done to improve current interventions?
    The 32 participants in this focus group study included social workers, medical social workers, and nurses from seven organizations who shared their knowledge and insights. All sessions were conducted online, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Three researchers with backgrounds in social work and psychology independently coded the transcripts and agreed on the themes emerging from the focus groups.
    Based on the experiences of frontline helping professionals in Hong Kong, we highlighted the key factors for effective elder abuse intervention: 1) identification and assessment; 2) essential skills and attitudes; 3) elements of effective interventions; 4) collaborative efforts across disciplines and agencies; and 5) raising awareness among professionals and the public.
    Training can equip frontline professionals with the necessary skills to identify elder abuse cases and to assess the risk of abuse. Effective interventions should not only address clients\' safety and need for tangible support but also respect their autonomy and privacy. A client-centered, strength-based approach that involves supportive peers and addresses the complex family relationships involved can be useful. Interventions should also involve cross-discipline and cross-agency collaboration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    BACKGROUND: The introduction and development of the advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) is a global trend in nursing. However, the development of APRNs in Taiwan remains uncertain and lacks necessary consensus.
    OBJECTIVE: This research study aimed to explore the views and suggestions of nursing experts in industry, government, and academia regarding the development of APRNs (clinical nurse specialists, case managers, certified clinical registered nurse anesthetists, and certified nurse-midwives) in Taiwan.
    METHODS: Data were collected from March to August 2017. Sixty-four experts participated in one of six focus group discussions held in northern, central, and southern Taiwan. These group discussions were recorded and transcribed verbatim with the consent of the participants. Content analysis was used to analyze the transcribed data.
    RESULTS: The comments and suggestions raised during the discussions were categorized into four major themes: professional development of necessity, core competencies, accreditation, and future promotion-related issues. Each theme was further divided into several subthemes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The opinions of relevant experts regarding the current status of development of the roles, practical scope, and management and suggestions for APRNs were summarized to facilitate the future development of APRNs in Taiwan in terms of education, core competencies, certification, and practical scope. Furthermore, the results may be referenced in the establishment of a nursing consensus model and as a basis for promoting APRNs.
    BACKGROUND: 蛻變的白衣天使—進階護理師的發展與突破.
    UNASSIGNED: 發展進階護理師制度為全球趨勢,然而台灣進階護理制度的發展仍處於妾身未明階段,亟需凝聚護理界共識。.
    UNASSIGNED: 本研究旨在探討產官學界護理專家對台灣發展進階護理師(臨床護理專家、個案管理師、註冊麻醉護理師、註冊助產護理師)的看法與建言。.
    UNASSIGNED: 資料收集時間為2017年3月至8月。總計64位專家分別參與北、中、南6場的焦點團體討論,所有內容皆經研究對象同意錄音與繕打成逐字稿後轉製成文本,並以內容分析法進行資料分析。.
    UNASSIGNED: 產官學界之護理專家對台灣發展進階護理師的意見與建議可歸納為四項主題:發展需求、核心能力、認證與未來推動相關議題,每一主題皆區分出數個次主題。.
    UNASSIGNED: 本研究結果彙整護理產官學專家對台灣發展各類進階護理角色功能、執業範疇與管理之現況意見,以及對台灣未來發展各類進階護理角色在教育、核心能力、證照與執業範疇等之建議,可作為建立護理共識模式的視窗及未來推動進階護理師制度的依據。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究人员对精神病医院的侵略感兴趣。关于不同利益相关者如何看待患者侵略的信息仍然模棱两可。对利益相关者对攻击性行为的理解可能存在的相似性或差异的了解更少,在精神病医院进行管理和预防。我们旨在探索关于患者攻击性的多种观点,其可能的原因和结果,以及预防和管理的发展思路。
    采用了定性设计。使用焦点小组访谈收集数据。采用了专题方法进行解释。这些数据是在香港两个住院精神病环境的15个成人病房收集的。参与者是在精神科住院病房工作的护士,病人进入病房,和非正式护理人员访问住院病房(N=94)。
    发现所有群体之间的共同点是如何感知患者的攻击性,以及为什么会发生。患者,尤其是护士描述了患者的侵略是如何在没有明确原因或预警的情况下发生的,以及患者在发生侵略事件后如何受到身体控制或限制。只有护士和病人表示经历身体负担,而所有群体都认为心理负担是侵略的结果。所有小组都建议护士采取有益的态度,更好的沟通,结构变化,更好的自我管理技能可以防止病人的攻击。风险评估仅由护士和患者提出,而安全措施仅由护士和非正式护理人员提出。所有小组都建议使用限制性干预措施来管理侵略性事件。
    尽管不同利益相关者群体对患者侵略的观点存在复杂的多样性,调查结果强调,有可能在精神病医院中实现对侵略的相互理解,并确定要开发的领域。应改善员工与患者和非正式护理人员的参与和沟通态度和技能。在治疗期间,治疗环境和文化仍有发展空间,以进行有意义的活动。
    Aggression in psychiatric hospitals has been of interest to researchers. Information on how different stakeholders perceive patient aggression remains equivocal. Even less is known about possible similarities or differences in stakeholders\' perceptions of how aggressive behaviour is understood, managed and prevented in psychiatric hospitals. We aimed to explore multiple viewpoints on patient aggression, its possible causes and outcomes, and development ideas for prevention and management.
    A qualitative design was adopted. The data were collected using focus group interviews. A thematic approach was used for interpretation. The data were collected on 15 adult wards in two inpatient psychiatric settings in Hong Kong. Participants were nurses working on the psychiatric inpatient wards, patients admitted to the wards, and informal caregivers visiting inpatient wards (N = 94).
    Commonalities between all groups were found on how patient aggression is perceived, and why it occurs. Patients and especially nurses described how patient aggression occurred with no clear reason or forewarning and how patients were physically controlled or restricted after aggressive events. Only nurses and patients expressed experiencing physical burden, while all groups considered psychological burden to be a consequence of aggression. All groups proposed that helpful attitudes among nurses, better communication, structural changes, and better self-management skills would prevent patient aggression. Risk assessment was proposed only by nurses and patients, while safety measures were proposed by nurses and informal caregivers only. The use of restrictive interventions to manage aggressive events was proposed by all groups.
    Despite the complex diversity of perspectives in different stakeholder groups regarding patient aggression, the findings highlighted that it is possible to achieve some mutual understanding of aggression in psychiatric hospitals and identify areas to be developed. Staffs\' attitudes and skills for engagement and communication with patients and informal caregivers should be improved. There is also still room to develop the therapeutic environment and culture toward meaningful activities during the treatment period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号