extubation

拔管
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经胸超声心动图显示的二尖瓣多普勒流入速度与环形组织多普勒波速度的比值(E/Ea)和膈肌超声显示的膈肌偏移(DE)已被证实可以预测拔管结果。然而,很少有研究集中在自主呼吸试验(SBT)过程中不同位置的E/Ea和DE的预测值,以及△E/Ea和△DE的影响(SBT期间E/Ea和DE的变化)。
    方法:这项研究是对2017年发表的先前研究中60名难以断奶的患者的数据进行的重新分析。所有符合条件的参与者在拔管后48h内分为呼吸衰竭(RF)组和拔管成功(ES)组。拔管后1周内或再插管(RI)组和非插管(NI)组。呼吸衰竭和再插管的危险因素包括E/Ea和△E/Ea。采用多元逻辑回归分析不同位置的DE和△DE,分别。E/Ea(间隔,横向,平均值)和DE(右,左,平均值)相互比较,分别。
    结果:在60名患者中,29例48h内出现呼吸衰竭,其中14例需要在1周内重新插管。多因素logistic回归分析显示E/Ea均与呼吸衰竭相关,而SBT后只有DE(右)和DE(平均)与再插管有关。E/Ea在不同位置的ROC曲线之间没有统计学差异。在DE的ROC曲线之间也是如此。RF组和ES组△E/Ea差异无统计学意义。NI组的△DE(平均值)明显高于RI组。然而,多因素logistic回归分析显示△DE(平均值)与再次插管无关。
    结论:在SBT期间不同位置的E/Ea可以预测拔管后呼吸衰竭,但它们之间没有统计学差异。同样,SBT后只有DE(右)和DE(平均)可以预测再次插管,彼此之间没有统计学差异.
    BACKGROUND: The ratio (E/Ea) of mitral Doppler inflow velocity to annular tissue Doppler wave velocity by transthoracic echocardiography and diaphragmatic excursion (DE) by diaphragm ultrasound have been confirmed to predict extubation outcomes. However, few studies focused on the predicting value of E/Ea and DE at different positions during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), as well as the effects of △E/Ea and △DE (changes in E/Ea and DE during a SBT).
    METHODS: This study was a reanalysis of the data of 60 difficult-to-wean patients in a previous study published in 2017. All eligible participants were organized into respiratory failure (RF) group and extubation success (ES) group within 48 h after extubation, or re-intubation (RI) group and non-intubation (NI) group within 1 week after extubation. The risk factors for respiratory failure and re-intubation including E/Ea and △E/Ea, DE and △DE at different positions were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of E/Ea (septal, lateral, average) and DE (right, left, average) were compared with each other, respectively.
    RESULTS: Of the 60 patients, 29 cases developed respiratory failure within 48 h, and 14 of those cases required re-intubation within 1 week. Multivariate logistic regression showed that E/Ea were all associated with respiratory failure, while only DE (right) and DE (average) after SBT were related to re-intubation. There were no statistic differences among the ROC curves of E/Ea at different positions, nor between the ROC curves of DE. No statistical differences were shown in △E/Ea between RF and ES groups, while △DE (average) was remarkably higher in NI group than that in RI group. However, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that △DE (average) was not associated with re-intubation.
    CONCLUSIONS: E/Ea at different positions during a SBT could predict postextubation respiratory failure with no statistical differences among them. Likewise, only DE (right) and DE (average) after SBT might predict re-intubation with no statistical differences between each other.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:危重患者拔管前禁食的做法是可变的。禁食在减少胃体积方面的功效尚未得到很好的证实。这项研究的主要目的是使用胃超声检查评估禁食4小时对禁食拔管的危重病患者空腹患病率的影响。次要目标是评估禁食4小时期间胃体积的变化,并确定禁食后与空腹相关的因素。
    方法:这是一个单中心,prospective,观察性研究的成人ICU受试者连续肠内喂养至少6小时并进行机械通气。在开始禁食之前立即进行胃超声检查,禁食4小时后,和禁食4小时后的鼻胃(NG)抽吸后。空腹定义为胃体积≤1.5mL/kg。
    结果:招募了40名受试者,和38(95%)的图像适合分析。空腹4小时后空腹患病率增加(25[65.8%]vs31[81.6%],P=.041),并在禁食4小时后进行NG抽吸(25[65.8%]vs34[89.5%],P=.008)。禁食前和禁食后4小时之间的中位(四分位数范围)胃体积/体重存在显着差异(1.0[0.5-1.8]mL/kgvs0.4[0.2-1.0]mL/kg,P<.001)。禁食4小时后,没有患者因素与空腹患病率较高相关。
    结论:大多数机械通气的受试者在禁食拔管前胃排空。禁食4小时后,拔管时空腹的患病率进一步增加至>80%。
    BACKGROUND: Practice on fasting prior to extubation in critically ill patients is variable. Efficacy of fasting in reducing gastric volume has not been well established. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of 4 h of fasting on prevalence of empty stomach using gastric ultrasonography in critically ill subjects who are fasted for extubation. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the change in gastric volumes during 4 h of fasting and to determine factors associated with empty stomach after fasting.
    METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, observational study on adult ICU subjects who were enterally fed for at least 6 h continuously and mechanically ventilated. Gastric ultrasound was performed immediately prior to commencement of fasting, after 4 h of fasting, and after nasogastric (NG) aspiration after 4 h of fasting. An empty stomach was defined as a gastric volume ≤ 1.5 mL/kg.
    RESULTS: Forty subjects were recruited, and 38 (95%) had images suitable for analysis. The prevalence of empty stomach increased after 4 h of fasting (25 [65.8%] vs 31 [81.6%], P = .041) and after 4 h of fasting with NG aspiration (25 [65.8%] vs 34 [89.5%], P = .008). There was a significant difference in median (interquartile range) gastric volume per body weight between before fasting and 4 h after fasting (1.0 [0.5-1.8] mL/kg vs 0.4 [0.2-1.0] mL/kg, P < .001). No patient factors were associated with higher prevalence of empty stomach after 4 h of fasting.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most mechanically ventilated subjects had empty stomachs prior to fasting for extubation. Fasting for 4 h further increased the prevalence of empty stomach at extubation to > 80%.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:机械通气患者的膈肌功能障碍与撤机结果相关,在膈肌功能障碍的情况下,副呼吸肌将被招募。本研究的主要目的是探讨胸骨旁肋间肌增厚分数与膈肌增厚分数比(TFic1/TFdi2)的关系,以预测断奶结局。并与D-RSBI预测断奶失败的准确性进行比较。
    方法:我们前瞻性招募了2022年7月5日/2023年的连续患者。我们测量了TFIC,TFdi,通过超声和diaphragm肌偏移(DE3),并计算TFic/TFdi比率和diaphragm肌快速浅呼吸指数(D-RSBI4)。接收器-操作员特征(ROC5)曲线评估了TFic/TFdi比率和D-RSBI预测断奶失败的准确性。
    结果:161个被纳入最终分析,114例患者(70.8%)成功脱离机械通气。TFic/TFdi比值(AUROC=0.887(95%CI:0.821-0.953))优于D-RSBI(AUROC=0.875(95%CI:0.807-0.944))预测断奶失败。
    结论:TFic/TFdi比率可高精度预测断奶失败,优于D-RSBI。
    BACKGROUND: Diaphragm dysfunction is associated with weaning outcomes in mechanical ventilation patients, in the case of diaphragm dysfunction, the accessory respiratory muscles would be recruited. The main purpose of this study is to explore the performance of parasternal intercostal muscle thickening fraction in relation to diaphragmatic thickening fraction ratio (TFic1/TFdi2) for predicting weaning outcomes, and compare its accuracy with D-RSBI in predicting weaning failure.
    METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients from 7/2022-5/2023. We measured TFic, TFdi, and diaphragmatic excursion (DE3) by ultrasound and calculated the TFic/TFdi ratio and diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index (D-RSBI4). Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC5) curves evaluated the accuracy of the TFic/TFdi ratio and D-RSBI in predicting weaning failure.
    RESULTS: 161 were included in the final analysis, 114 patients (70.8%) were successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation. The TFic/TFdi ratio (AUROC = 0.887 (95% CI: 0.821-0.953)) was superior to the D-RSBI (AUROC = 0.875 (95% CI: 0.807-0.944)) for predicting weaning failure.
    CONCLUSIONS: The TFic/TFdi ratio predicted weaning failure with high accuracy and outperformed the D-RSBI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管拔管失败的原因很多,拔管前24小时维持负或低正体液平衡可能是成功拔管的关键措施.
    目的:评估重症监护病房(ICU)机械通气患者拔管前液体平衡的预测价值及其转归。
    方法:本回顾性队列研究收集了2022年1月至2022年12月在兰州普通成人ICU接受机械通气患者的临床资料。根据拔管结果,将患者分为拔管成功组和拔管失败组。比较拔管前24h的液体平衡水平,分析液体平衡对机械通气患者拔管结果的预测价值。
    结果:在这项研究中,我们收集了入住普通成人ICU的545例患者的临床数据.根据纳入和排除标准,265例(48.6%)患者被纳入,其中197例(74.3%)成功拔管;68例(25.7%)患者拔管不成功。拔管失败组患者拔管前24h的总摄入量和液体平衡水平明显高于拔管成功组,中位数为2679.00(2410.44-3193.50)mL与2435.40(1805.04-2957.00)mL,831.50(26.25-1407.94)mL与346.00(-163.00-941.50)mL。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析表明,预测拔管结果的最佳临界值为497.5mL(灵敏度为64.7%,特异性59.4%),用于拔管前24小时的液体平衡。ROC曲线下面积为0.627(95%置信区间[CI]0.547-0.707)。基于Logistic回归模型,拔管前24小时累积液体平衡>497.5mL可以预测ICU机械通气患者的预后(OR=5.591,95%CI[2.402-13.015],p<.05)。
    结论:ICU机械通气患者拔管前24h的液体平衡水平与拔管结果相关。当液体平衡水平>497.5mL时,拔管失败的风险更高。
    结论:气管插管是许多危重病人的重要生命支持技术,确定拔管的适当时间仍然是临床医生面临的挑战。虽然拔管失败的原因很多,持续液体平衡和容量超负荷引起的急性肺水肿是拔管失败的主要原因之一。因此,研究液体平衡与拔管结局的关系对改善ICU有创机械通气患者的预后非常重要。
    BACKGROUND: Although there are many reasons for extubation failure, maintaining negative or lower positive fluid balances 24 hours before extubation may be a key measure for successful extubation.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive value of fluid balance before extubation and its outcome in mechanically ventilated cases in the intensive care unit (ICU).
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved collecting clinical data from patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in Lanzhou general adult ICU from January 2022 to December 2022. Based on extubation outcomes, the patients were divided into a successful extubation group and a failed extubation group. Their fluid balance levels 24 h before extubation were compared with analyse the predictive value of fluid balance on extubation outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.
    RESULTS: In this study, clinical data from 545 patients admitted to a general adult ICU were collected. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 265 (48.6%) patients were included, of which 197 (74.3%) were successfully extubated; extubation was unsuccessful in 68 (25.7%) patients. The total intake and fluid balance levels in patients in the failed extubation group 24 h before extubation were significantly higher than those in the successful extubation group, with a median of 2679.00 (2410.44-3193.50) mL versus 2435.40 (1805.04-2957.00) mL, 831.50 (26.25-1407.94) mL versus 346.00 (-163.00-941.50) mL. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value for predicting extubation outcomes was 497.5 mL (sensitivity 64.7%, specificity 59.4%) for fluid balance 24 h before extubation. The area under the ROC curve was 0.627 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.547-0.707). Based on the logistic regression model, cumulative fluid balance >497.5 mL 24 h before extubation could predict its outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU (OR = 5.591, 95% CI [2.402-13.015], p < .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The fluid balance level 24 h before extubation was correlated with the outcome of extubation in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. The risk of extubation failure was higher when the fluid balance level was >497.5 mL.
    CONCLUSIONS: Tracheal intubation is a crucial life support technique for many critically ill patients, and determining the appropriate time for extubation remains a challenge for clinicians. Although there are many reasons for extubation failure, acute pulmonary oedema caused by continuous positive fluid balance and volume overload is one of the main reasons for extubation failure. Therefore, it is very important to study the relationship between fluid balance and extubation outcome to improve the prognosis of patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in ICU.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全身麻醉后出现躁动很常见,可能会导致不良后果,如损伤以及呼吸和循环并发症。全身麻醉后出现的躁动在鼻手术中比在其他外科手术中更常见。这项研究旨在评估在深度麻醉下或完全清醒时接受鼻手术的患者出现躁动的发生。
    方法:共202名患者(18-60岁,美国麻醉医师协会分类:I-II)在全身麻醉下进行鼻手术,随机分为两组:深拔管组(D组)和清醒拔管组(A组)。主要结果是出现躁动的发生率。次要结果包括出现波动的数量,镇静评分,生命体征,和不良事件的发生率。
    结果:D组苏醒期躁动发生率低于A组(34.7%vs.72.8%;p<0.001)。与A组相比,D组患者的里士满激动镇静量表评分较低,更高的Ramsay镇静评分,更少的激动发作,拔管时和手术后30分钟的平均动脉压降低,而这些指标在手术后90分钟没有差异。两组不良事件发生率无差异。
    结论:深度麻醉下拔管可显著减少全麻鼻部手术后苏醒期躁动,且不增加不良事件的发生率。
    背景:于2021年4月14日在Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT04844333)注册。
    BACKGROUND: Post-anesthetic emergence agitation is common after general anesthesia and may cause adverse consequences, such as injury as well as respiratory and circulatory complications. Emergence agitation after general anesthesia occurs more frequently in nasal surgery than in other surgical procedures. This study aimed to assess the occurrence of emergence agitation in patients undergoing nasal surgery who were extubated under deep anesthesia or when fully awake.
    METHODS: A total of 202 patients (18-60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification: I-II) undergoing nasal surgery under general anesthesia were randomized 1:1 into two groups: a deep extubation group (group D) and an awake extubation group (group A). The primary outcome was the incidence of emergence agitation. The secondary outcomes included number of emergence agitations, sedation score, vital signs, and incidence of adverse events.
    RESULTS: The incidence of emergence agitation was lower in group D than in group A (34.7% vs. 72.8%; p < 0.001). Compared to group A, patients in group D had lower Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores, higher Ramsay sedation scores, fewer agitation episodes, and lower mean arterial pressure when extubated and 30 min after surgery, whereas these indicators did not differ 90 min after surgery. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Extubation under deep anesthesia can significantly reduce emergence agitation after nasal surgery under general anesthesia without increasing the incidence of adverse events.
    BACKGROUND: Registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04844333) on 14/04/2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    术后残留的神经肌肉阻滞(PRNB)对患者的安全性和幸福感有重大影响,但仍被低估。运用力测力计客观评价手握力能有用辨别术后肌肉无力。
    包括32例接受全身麻醉的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I级和II级患者。在四组(TOR)比率(TOFR)>0.90后,患者拔管,并且运动功率恢复的临床标准被认为是足够的。测量的手握力和峰值呼气流速(PEFR)在基线,拔管后15分钟,术后1、2和4h。确定从基线显著下降的发生率(>25%)。使用Spearman相关性评估握力与PEFR之间的相关性。使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析进行肌肉握力和PEFR回到基线的时间。0.05的P值被认为对于所有测试是显著的。
    在15和60分钟时,握力从基线开始显着下降的发生率为100%,在2小时时为76%,4h时为9.4%。肌肉握力与PEFR之间存在很强的相关性(0.89,P<0.001)。所有患者均未出现PRNB的潜在并发症。(人民币摘要。应该是均匀的)恢复到肌肉握力基线值的平均时间为3.8h(95%置信区间[CI]3.6-3.9),PEFR恢复至基线的平均时间为3.2h(95%CI2.9-3.4h).
    使用力测力计客观评估肌肉握力有可能成为监测术后肌肉无力的新客观指标。
    UNASSIGNED: The postoperative residual neuromuscular block (PRNB) has a significant impact on patient safety and well-being, but continues to remain underestimated. Objective evaluation of handgrip strength using a force dynamometer can be useful to identify postoperative muscle weakness.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-two American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II patients who received general anesthesia were included. Patients were extubated after the train-of-four (TOR) ratio (TOFR) was >0.90 and the clinical criteria for motor power recovery were judged as adequate. The measurements of handgrip strength and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were obtained at baseline, 15 min after extubation, and 1, 2, and 4 h postoperatively. The incidence of significant decline from baseline (>25%) was determined. The correlation between handgrip strength and PEFR was assessed using Spearman correlation. The time to return to baseline for muscle grip strength and PEFR was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. A P value of 0.05 was considered significant for all tests.
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of the significant decline in handgrip strength from baseline was 100% at 15 and 60 min, 76% at 2 h, and 9.4% at 4 h. There was a strong correlation between muscle grip strength and PEFR (0.89, P < 0.001). None of the patients exhibited the potential complications of PRNB. (PRMB in abstract. It should be uniform) The mean time to return to the baseline value of muscle grip strength was 3.8 h (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-3.9), and the mean time to return to baseline for PEFR was 3.2 h (95% CI 2.9-3.4 h).
    UNASSIGNED: Objective assessment of muscle grip strength using a force dynamometer has the potential to be a new objective metric to monitor postoperative muscle weakness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    麻醉出现时咳嗽是一个常见问题,可能会导致不良事件。由于个体差异,单一疗法在预防出现咳嗽方面面临不确定性。我们旨在评估多模式干预预防鼻内镜手术后患者出现咳嗽的有效性和安全性。
    在这项双盲随机试验中,将150例接受鼻内镜手术的成年患者随机分为三组。对于对照组(n=50),根据临床常规进行麻醉,没有提供干预。对于双重干预组(n=50),插管前气管内喷洒生理盐水3mL,插管后10分钟内输注0.4μg/kg右美托咪定,术后拔管前靶控瑞芬太尼输注维持在1.5ng/mL的效应点浓度.对于多模式干预组(n=50),插管前气管内喷洒0.5%罗哌卡因3mL,右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼作为双干预组。主要终点是出现咳嗽的发生率,定义为从手术结束到拔管后5分钟的单次咳嗽或更多。
    对照组出现咳嗽的发生率为98%(49/50),双组90%(45/50),在多模态组中有70%(35/50),分别。多模式组的发病率明显低于对照组(相对危险度0.71;95%CI0.59至0.86;p<0.001)和双模式组(相对危险度0.78;95%CI0.63至0.95;p=0.012);双模式组和对照组之间的差异无统计学意义(相对危险度0.92;95%CI0.83至1.02;p=0.20)。多模式组咽喉痛的严重程度明显低于对照组(中位数差异-1;95%CI-2至0;p=0.016)。不良事件在三组之间没有差异。
    对于接受鼻内手术的成年患者,多模式干预包括罗哌卡因插管前局部麻醉,右美托咪定插管后给药,术后拔管前输注瑞芬太尼可显着减少咳嗽的出现,是安全的。
    UNASSIGNED: Cough during emergence from anesthesia is a common problem and may cause adverse events. Monotherapy faces uncertainty in preventing emergence cough due to individual differences. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multimodal intervention for preventing emergence cough in patients following nasal endoscopic surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: In this double-blind randomized trial, 150 adult patients undergoing nasal endoscopic surgery were randomly allocated into three groups. For the control group (n = 50), anesthesia was performed according to clinical routine, no intervention was provided. For the double intervention group (n = 50), normal saline 3 mL was sprayed endotracheally before intubation, 0.4 μg/kg dexmedetomidine was infused over 10 min after intubation, and target-controlled remifentanil infusion was maintained at an effect-site concentration of 1.5 ng/mL before extubation after surgery. For the multimodal intervention group (n = 50), 0.5% ropivacaine 3 mL was sprayed endotracheally before intubation, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil were administered as those in the double intervention group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of emergence cough, defined as single cough or more from end of surgery to 5 min after extubation.
    UNASSIGNED: The incidences of emergence cough were 98% (49/50) in the control group, 90% (45/50) in the double group, and 70% (35/50) in the multimodal group, respectively. The incidence was significantly lower in the multimodal group than those in the control (relative risk 0.71; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.86; p < 0.001) and double (relative risk 0.78; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.95; p = 0.012) groups; the difference between the double and control groups was not statistically significant (relative risk 0.92; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.02; p = 0.20). The severity of sore throat was significantly lower in the multimodal group than that in the control group (median difference-1; 95% CI -2 to 0; p = 0.016). Adverse events did not differ among the three groups.
    UNASSIGNED: For adult patients undergoing endonasal surgery, multimodal intervention including ropivacaine topical anesthesia before intubation, dexmedetomidine administration after intubation, and remifentanil infusion before extubation after surgery significantly reduced emergence cough and was safe.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    癌症患者不断升级的气道管理需求促使我们不断地管理气道设备,声门上气道装置(SAD)在这方面发挥着重要作用。SAD用作维持上气道开放的工具。自1980年代初最早的SAD成立以来,一系列先进和增强型的第二代器械已在临床应用.这些升级的SAD集成了特定功能,旨在增强正压通气并减轻误吸风险。如今,它们广泛用于全身麻醉程序,并在困难的气道管理中起关键作用,院前护理,和急诊医学。在某些情况下,SAD可被认为是优于气管内导管(ETT)的替代方案,并且可用于更广泛的外科手术和非手术病例。这篇综述概述了当前的证据,分类摘要,相关应用场景,以及未来SAD的开发或临床应用需要改进的领域。
    The escalating airway management demands of cancer patients have prompted us to continually curate airway devices, with supraglottic airway devices (SADs) playing a significant role in this regard. SADs serve as instrumental tools for maintaining an open upper airway. Since the inception of the earliest SADs in the early 1980s, an array of advanced and enhanced second-generation devices have been employed in clinical settings. These upgraded SADs integrate specific features designed to enhance positive-pressure ventilation and mitigate the risk of aspiration. Nowadays, they are extensively used in general anesthesia procedures and play a critical role in difficult airway management, pre-hospital care, and emergency medicine. In certain situations, SADs may be deemed a superior alternative to endotracheal tube (ETT) and can be employed in a broader spectrum of surgical and non-surgical cases. This review provides an overview of the current evidence, a summary of classifications, relevant application scenarios, and areas for improvement in the development or clinical application of future SADs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:外伤性颈髓损伤(CSCI)患者拔管失败可能是由于膈肌功能受损所致,监测膈肌电活动(EAdi)可以指导拔管。我们旨在评估一次最大动作期间EAdi的变化是否可以预测CSCI患者的拔管结果。
    方法:这是一项对三级医院ICU中需要机械通气的CSCI患者的回顾性研究。通过要求每位患者在第一次自主呼吸试验(SBT)中以最大强度吸气来进行一次最大动作。基线(最大机动前的SBT期间),最大值(在单次最大机动期间),和EAdi的增加(ΔEAdi,等于基线和最大值之间的差异)。主要结果是拔管成功,定义为在ICU住院期间首次拔管后无再插管和任何拔管前无气管造口术。
    结果:在107名患者中,在第一次SBT时成功拔管50例(46.7%)。EAdi基线,最大EAdi,ΔEAdi明显更高,成功拔管的患者的快速浅呼吸指数低于失败的患者。通过多变量逻辑分析,ΔEAdi与成功拔管独立相关(OR2.03,95%CI1.52-3.17)。ΔEAdi在AUROC0.978(95%CI0.941-0.995)预测拔管成功方面表现出很高的诊断准确性,截止值为7.0μV。
    结论:在一次最大动作中,EAdi从基线SBT的增加与成功拔管相关,并有助于指导CSCI患者的拔管。
    BACKGROUND: The unsuccessful extubation in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries (CSCI) may result from impairment diaphragm function and monitoring of diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi) can be informative in guiding extubation. We aimed to evaluate whether the change of EAdi during a single maximal maneuver can predict extubation outcomes in CSCI patients.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective study of CSCI patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the ICU of a tertiary hospital. A single maximal maneuver was performed by asking each patient to inhale with maximum strength during the first spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). The baseline (during SBT before maximal maneuver), maximum (during the single maximal maneuver), and the increase of EAdi (ΔEAdi, equal to the difference between baseline and maximal) were measured. The primary outcome was extubation success, defined as no reintubation after the first extubation and no tracheostomy before any extubation during the ICU stay.
    RESULTS: Among 107 patients enrolled, 50 (46.7%) were extubated successfully at the first SBT. Baseline EAdi, maximum EAdi, and ΔEAdi were significantly higher, and the rapid shallow breathing index was lower in patients who were extubated successfully than in those who failed. By multivariable logistic analysis, ΔEAdi was independently associated with successful extubation (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.52-3.17). ΔEAdi demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in predicting extubation success with an AUROC 0.978 (95% CI 0.941-0.995), and the cut-off value was 7.0 μV.
    CONCLUSIONS: The increase of EAdi from baseline SBT during a single maximal maneuver is associated with successful extubation and can help guide extubation in CSCI patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号