extubation

拔管
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经胸超声心动图显示的二尖瓣多普勒流入速度与环形组织多普勒波速度的比值(E/Ea)和膈肌超声显示的膈肌偏移(DE)已被证实可以预测拔管结果。然而,很少有研究集中在自主呼吸试验(SBT)过程中不同位置的E/Ea和DE的预测值,以及△E/Ea和△DE的影响(SBT期间E/Ea和DE的变化)。
    方法:这项研究是对2017年发表的先前研究中60名难以断奶的患者的数据进行的重新分析。所有符合条件的参与者在拔管后48h内分为呼吸衰竭(RF)组和拔管成功(ES)组。拔管后1周内或再插管(RI)组和非插管(NI)组。呼吸衰竭和再插管的危险因素包括E/Ea和△E/Ea。采用多元逻辑回归分析不同位置的DE和△DE,分别。E/Ea(间隔,横向,平均值)和DE(右,左,平均值)相互比较,分别。
    结果:在60名患者中,29例48h内出现呼吸衰竭,其中14例需要在1周内重新插管。多因素logistic回归分析显示E/Ea均与呼吸衰竭相关,而SBT后只有DE(右)和DE(平均)与再插管有关。E/Ea在不同位置的ROC曲线之间没有统计学差异。在DE的ROC曲线之间也是如此。RF组和ES组△E/Ea差异无统计学意义。NI组的△DE(平均值)明显高于RI组。然而,多因素logistic回归分析显示△DE(平均值)与再次插管无关。
    结论:在SBT期间不同位置的E/Ea可以预测拔管后呼吸衰竭,但它们之间没有统计学差异。同样,SBT后只有DE(右)和DE(平均)可以预测再次插管,彼此之间没有统计学差异.
    BACKGROUND: The ratio (E/Ea) of mitral Doppler inflow velocity to annular tissue Doppler wave velocity by transthoracic echocardiography and diaphragmatic excursion (DE) by diaphragm ultrasound have been confirmed to predict extubation outcomes. However, few studies focused on the predicting value of E/Ea and DE at different positions during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), as well as the effects of △E/Ea and △DE (changes in E/Ea and DE during a SBT).
    METHODS: This study was a reanalysis of the data of 60 difficult-to-wean patients in a previous study published in 2017. All eligible participants were organized into respiratory failure (RF) group and extubation success (ES) group within 48 h after extubation, or re-intubation (RI) group and non-intubation (NI) group within 1 week after extubation. The risk factors for respiratory failure and re-intubation including E/Ea and △E/Ea, DE and △DE at different positions were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of E/Ea (septal, lateral, average) and DE (right, left, average) were compared with each other, respectively.
    RESULTS: Of the 60 patients, 29 cases developed respiratory failure within 48 h, and 14 of those cases required re-intubation within 1 week. Multivariate logistic regression showed that E/Ea were all associated with respiratory failure, while only DE (right) and DE (average) after SBT were related to re-intubation. There were no statistic differences among the ROC curves of E/Ea at different positions, nor between the ROC curves of DE. No statistical differences were shown in △E/Ea between RF and ES groups, while △DE (average) was remarkably higher in NI group than that in RI group. However, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that △DE (average) was not associated with re-intubation.
    CONCLUSIONS: E/Ea at different positions during a SBT could predict postextubation respiratory failure with no statistical differences among them. Likewise, only DE (right) and DE (average) after SBT might predict re-intubation with no statistical differences between each other.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估超声引导下双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)对通过中线胸骨切开术进行心脏手术的患者拔管时间的影响。
    方法:随机对照试验。
    方法:开罗大学医院和国家心脏研究所,埃及。
    方法:年龄在18至70岁的患者通过中线胸骨切开术接受了心脏手术。
    方法:招募的患者随机接受术前单次超声引导双侧ESPB或芬太尼输注。
    方法:主要结果是拔管时间。其他结果包括围手术期芬太尼总消耗量,使用数字评分(NRS)的疼痛评分,重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间,围手术期并发症发生率。
    结果:共有219名患者可用于最终分析。与对照组相比,ESPB组的平均拔管时间明显缩短(159.5±109.5分钟vs303.2±95.9分钟;平均差异,-143.7分钟;95%置信区间,-171.1至-116.3分钟;p=0.0001)。ESPB组的23例患者(21.1%)实现了超快速通道(术后立即)拔管,而对照组只有1例(0.9%)。与对照组相比,ESPB组的ICU住院时间显着减少(平均值,47.2±13.3小时vs78.9±25.2小时;p=0.0001)。术后24小时,与对照组相比,ESPB组的NRS降低更为明显(p=0.001)。
    结论:在通过中线胸骨切开术接受心脏手术的成年患者中,与接受芬太尼输注的患者相比,接受单次双侧ESPB的患者的拔管时间减少了一半.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on the time to extubation in patients who had undergone cardiac surgery through a midline sternotomy.
    METHODS: Randomized controlled trial.
    METHODS: Cairo University Hospital and National Heart Institute, Egypt.
    METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 70 years who underwent a cardiac surgical procedure through a midline sternotomy.
    METHODS: Recruited patients were randomized to receive either preoperative single-shot ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB or fentanyl infusion.
    METHODS: The primary outcome was the time to extubation. Other outcomes included total perioperative fentanyl consumption, pain score using the numerical rating score (NRS), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and incidence of perioperative complications.
    RESULTS: Two hundred and nineteen patients were available for final analysis. The mean time to extubation was significantly shorter In the ESPB group compared to the control group (159.5 ± 109.5 minutes vs 303.2 ± 95.9 minutes; mean difference, -143.7 minutes; 95% confidence interval, -171.1 to -116.3 minutes; p = 0.0001). Ultra-fast track (immediate postoperative) extubation was achieved in 23 patients (21.1%) in the ESPB group compared to only 1 patient (0.9%) in the control group. The ICU stay was significantly reduced in the ESPB group compared to the control group (mean, 47.2 ± 13.3 hours vs 78.9 ± 25.2 hours; p = 0.0001). There was a more significant reduction in NRS in the ESPB group compared to the control group for up to 24 hours postoperatively (p = 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Among adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery through a midline sternotomy, the extubation time was halved in patients who received single-shot bilateral ESPB compared to patients who received fentanyl infusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们旨在确定非计划拔管(UE)的流行病学和结果,意外和自拔管,在ICU。
    方法:在47个法国ICU中进行了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。机械通气(MV)天数,在连续3个月的最短时间内,在每个中心记录计划和非计划拔管,以评估UE发生率.患者特征,UE环境因素,根据UE机制(意外或自行拔管)比较结果.使用倾向匹配的人群将自我拔管结果与计划拔管进行比较。最后,自行拔管后确定拔管失败的危险因素(第7天之前再次插管).
    结果:在12个月的纳入期内,我们发现合并的UE发生率为每100MV天1.0.UE占所有气管内去除量的9%。在605个UE中,88%为自我拔管,12%为意外拔管。后者的预后比自我拔管更差(34%vs.8%ICU死亡率,p<0.001)。与计划拔管相比,自我拔管并未增加死亡率(8vs.11%,p=0.075)。不管拔管的类型如何,有计划或无计划,拔管失败与不良结局独立相关.癌症,更高的呼吸频率,拔管时降低PaO2/FiO2,断奶过程不进行,拔管后即刻呼吸衰竭是自我拔管失败的独立预测因素。
    结论:非计划拔管,主要表现为自我拔管,在ICU中很常见,占所有气管内拔管的9%。虽然意外拔管是一种严重且罕见的不良事件,与计划拔管相比,自我拔管不会增加死亡率.
    BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the epidemiology and outcomes of unplanned extubation (UE), both accidental and self-extubation, in ICU.
    METHODS: A multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted in 47 French ICUs. The number of mechanical ventilation (MV) days, and planned and unplanned extubation were recorded in each center over a minimum period of three consecutive months to evaluate UE incidence. Patient characteristics, UE environmental factors, and outcomes were compared based on the UE mechanism (accidental or self-extubation). Self-extubation outcomes were compared with planned extubation using a propensity-matched population. Finally, risk factors for extubation failure (re-intubation before day 7) were determined following self-extubation.
    RESULTS: During the 12-month inclusion period, we found a pooled UE incidence of 1.0 per 100 MV days. UE accounted for 9% of all endotracheal removals. Of the 605 UE, 88% were self-extubation and 12% were accidental-extubations. The latter had a worse prognosis than self-extubation (34%vs. 8% ICU-mortality, p < 0.001). Self-extubation did not increase mortality compared with planned extubation (8 vs. 11%, p =  0.075). Regardless of the type of extubation, planned or unplanned, extubation failure was independently associated with a poor outcome. Cancer, higher respiratory rate, lower PaO2/FiO2 at the time of extubation, weaning process not-ongoing, and immediate post-extubation respiratory failure were independent predictors of failed self-extubation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned extubation, mostly represented by self-extubation, is common in ICU and accounts for 9% of all endotracheal extubations. While accidental extubations are a serious and infrequent adverse event, self-extubation does not increase mortality compared to planned extubation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在机械通气的标准断奶中,成功的自主呼吸测试(SBT)包括30分钟的8cmH2O压力支持通气(PSV8),而没有呼气末正压(PEEP),然后是连续吸气的拔管;然而,这些做法可能会促进退伍。有证据支持不吸痰拔管的可行性和安全性。超声可以评估肺通气和呼吸肌。我们假设旨在保持肺容量的断奶可以产生更高的成功拔管率。
    方法:这项多中心优势试验将随机分配符合条件的患者接受标准断奶[SBT:30分钟PSV8无PEEP,然后连续吸气拔管]或保留肺容量断奶[SBT:30分钟PSV8+5cmH2OPEEP,然后正压无吸气拔管]。我们将比较拔管和再插管的成功率,ICU和住院,和充气肺体积的超声测量(改良肺超声评分),膈肌和肋间肌厚度,以及SBT成功或失败前后的增稠分数。患者将在随机化后随访90天。
    结论:我们的目标是招募大量代表性患者(N=1600)。我们的研究无法阐明PEEP在SBT期间和拔管期间正压的具体作用;结果将显示这两个因素的协同作用产生的联合作用。虽然对肺部进行普遍的超声监测,隔膜,整个断奶过程中的肋间肌是不可行的,如果断奶是断奶失败的主要原因,超声可以帮助临床医生决定高危和临界患者的拔管。
    背景:加泰罗尼亚基金会的研究伦理委员会(CEIm)批准了该研究(CEI22/67和23/26)。2023年8月在ClinicalTrials.gov注册。标识符:NCT05526053。
    BACKGROUND: In standard weaning from mechanical ventilation, a successful spontaneous breathing test (SBT) consisting of 30 min 8 cmH2O pressure-support ventilation (PSV8) without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is followed by extubation with continuous suctioning; however, these practices might promote derecruitment. Evidence supports the feasibility and safety of extubation without suctioning. Ultrasound can assess lung aeration and respiratory muscles. We hypothesize that weaning aiming to preserve lung volume can yield higher rates of successful extubation.
    METHODS: This multicenter superiority trial will randomly assign eligible patients to receive either standard weaning [SBT: 30-min PSV8 without PEEP followed by extubation with continuous suctioning] or lung-volume-preservation weaning [SBT: 30-min PSV8 + 5 cmH2O PEEP followed by extubation with positive pressure without suctioning]. We will compare the rates of successful extubation and reintubation, ICU and hospital stays, and ultrasound measurements of the volume of aerated lung (modified lung ultrasound score), diaphragm and intercostal muscle thickness, and thickening fraction before and after successful or failed SBT. Patients will be followed for 90 days after randomization.
    CONCLUSIONS: We aim to recruit a large sample of representative patients (N = 1600). Our study cannot elucidate the specific effects of PEEP during SBT and of positive pressure during extubation; the results will show the joint effects derived from the synergy of these two factors. Although universal ultrasound monitoring of lungs, diaphragm, and intercostal muscles throughout weaning is unfeasible, if derecruitment is a major cause of weaning failure, ultrasound may help clinicians decide about extubation in high-risk and borderline patients.
    BACKGROUND: The Research Ethics Committee (CEIm) of the Fundació Unió Catalana d\'Hospitals approved the study (CEI 22/67 and 23/26). Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov in August 2023. Identifier: NCT05526053.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重新插管与较高的死亡风险相关。没有明确的证据表明最好的自主呼吸试验(SBT)方法可以降低再插管的风险。
    目的:与T管相比,在危重患者中进行SBT的不同方法是否具有不同的再插管风险?
    方法:我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,研究了不同SBT方法对再插管的影响。我们调查了PubMed,MEDLINE,CINAHL和CENTRAL数据库从开始到2024年1月26日。累积排序曲线下的表面(SUCRA)用于确定干预被评为最佳的可能性。还通过频率荟萃分析研究了成对比较。根据等级方法评估证据的确定性。
    结果:共纳入22项随机对照试验,共6196名患者。该网络包括9个节点,有13个直接成对比较。大约71%的患者被分配到T型管和PSV-ZEEP,2135和2101名患者,分别。与T管相比,唯一的再插管风险显着降低的干预措施是高流量氧气(HFO)(RR0.23,CrI0.09至0.51,中等质量证据)。HFO与降低再插管风险的最佳干预措施的可能性最高(81.86%,SUCRA96.42),其次是持续气道正压通气(11.8%,SUCRA76.75).
    结论:与其他SBT方法相比,HFOSBT与更低的再插管风险相关。我们的分析结果应谨慎考虑,因为调查HFOSBT的研究数量较少,以及与共同干预相关的潜在临床异质性。应进行进一步的试验以确认更大的患者队列的结果并评估特定的亚组。
    BACKGROUND: Reintubation is associated with higher risk of mortality. There is no clear evidence on the best spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) method to reduce the risk of reintubation.
    OBJECTIVE: Are different methods of conducting SBTs in critically ill patients associated with different risk of reintubation compared with T-tube?
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of different SBT methods on reintubation. We surveyed PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to January 26, 2024. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to determine the likelihood that an intervention was ranked as the best. Pairwise comparisons were also investigated by frequentist meta-analysis. Certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach.
    RESULTS: A total of 22 randomized controlled trials were included, for a total of 6,196 patients. The network included nine nodes, with 13 direct pairwise comparisons. About 71% of the patients were allocated to T-tube and pressure support ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure, with 2,135 and 2,101 patients, respectively. The only intervention with a significantly lower risk of reintubation compared with T-tube was high flow oxygen (HFO) (risk ratio, 0.23; 95% credibility interval, 0.09-0.51; moderate quality evidence). HFO was associated with the highest probability of being the best intervention for reducing the risk of reintubation (81.86%; SUCRA, 96.42), followed by CPAP (11.8%; SUCRA, 76.75).
    CONCLUSIONS: HFO SBT was associated with a lower risk of reintubation in comparison with other SBT methods. The results of our analysis should be considered with caution due to the low number of studies that investigated HFO SBTs and potential clinical heterogeneity related to cointerventions. Further trials should be performed to confirm the results on larger cohorts of patients and assess specific subgroups.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO; No.: CRD42023449264; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在分析新生儿首次拔管时使用皮质类固醇和肾上腺素的情况,并比较拔管成功和失败的婴儿的临床特征。
    方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,在台湾一个单一的III级新生儿重症监护病房进行。该研究包括215名在2020年至2021年之间出生的婴儿,他们在首次尝试拔管之前已经插管超过48小时。我们比较了两组围产期和围拔管期的特点和结局。成功拔管定义为拔管后72小时无侵入性通气支持。皮质类固醇之间的关系,局部肾上腺素,采用多因素logistic回归分析确定拔管成功.
    结果:在单变量分析中,拔管失败组接受静脉注射地塞米松的比例显著高于拔管成功组(p=0.006).此外,与成功拔管组相比,拔管失败组的肾上腺素雾化吸入持续时间更长(p=0.034),并且喉上段局部应用肾上腺素的次数更多(p=0.003).多因素分析显示,没有肺不张,拔管后72h心动过速,拔管后较低的PCO2是成功拔管的关键因素。
    结论:有全身性地塞米松的趋势,局部应用肾上腺素上喉,再插管组雾化吸入肾上腺素的持续时间更长。然而,使用皮质类固醇或局部肾上腺素与成功拔管无显著相关性.肺不张,二氧化碳水平升高,和心动过速被确定为拔管失败的危险因素.
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the use of corticosteroids and epinephrine in neonates for the first extubation attempt and compared clinical characteristics of infants with successful and failed extubation events.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single level III neonatal intensive care unit in Taiwan. The study included 215 infants born between 2020 and 2021 who had been intubated for more than 48 h before their first extubation attempt. We compared perinatal and peri-extubation characteristics and outcomes between the two groups. Successful extubation was defined as freedom from invasive ventilatory support 72 h after extubation. The relationship between corticosteroids, local epinephrine, and successful extubation was determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
    RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, the failed extubation group received a significantly higher proportion of intravenous dexamethasone (p = 0.006) than the successful extubation group. Furthermore, the failed extubation group had a longer duration of nebulized epinephrine (p = 0.034) and more episodes of local application of epinephrine to the superior larynx (p = 0.003) than the successful extubation group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the absence of lung atelectasis, tachycardia 72 h after extubation, and lower post-extubation PCO2 were the key factors associated with successful extubation.
    CONCLUSIONS: There were trends toward systemic dexamethasone, local application of epinephrine to the superior larynx, and longer duration of nebulized epinephrine in the reintubation group. However, corticosteroid or local epinephrine use was not significantly associated with successful extubation. Lung atelectasis, elevated levels of carbon dioxide, and tachycardia were identified as risk factors for extubation failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自主呼吸试验(SBT)技术在成功拔管与再插管风险之间的最佳平衡尚不清楚。我们试图确定替代SBT技术的比较疗效和安全性。
    方法:我们搜索了Medline,EMBASE,和Cochrane中央对照试验注册从开始到2023年2月,用于比较SBT技术在危重成人和儿童中的随机或准随机试验,并报告最初的SBT成功,成功拔管,再插管(主要结果)和死亡率(ICU,医院,最持久的;次要结果)比率。两名审稿人筛选,审查全文,和抽象的数据。我们进行了频繁随机效应网络荟萃分析。
    结果:我们纳入了40个RCTs(6716例患者)。压力支持(PS)与T型SBT是最常见的比较。初始成功SBT率随着PS[风险比(RR)1.08,95%置信区间(CI)(1.05-1.11)]而增加,PS/自动管补偿(ATC)[1.12(1.01-1.25),高流量鼻插管(HFNC)[1.07(1.00-1.13)(均为中等确定性),和ATC[RR1.11,(1.03-1.20);低确定性]SBT与T型SBT相比。同样,最初的成功SBT率随着PS的增加而增加,ATC,与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)SBT相比,PS/ATCSBT。成功拔管率随着PS[RR1.06,(1.03-1.09);高确定性]而增加,ATC[RR1.13,(1.05-1.21);中等确定性],和HFNC[RR1.06,(1.02-1.11);高确定性]SBT,与T型SBT相比。PS的再插管率几乎没有差异(与T形件)SBT[RR1.05,(0.91-1.21);低确定性],但与HFNCSBT相比,PS[RR2.84,(1.61-5.03);中等确定性]和ATC[RR2.95(1.57-5.56);中等确定性]SBT的再插管率增加。
    结论:通过压力增加进行的SBT(PS,ATC,PS/ATC)与不带(T形,CPAP)增加初始成功SBT和成功拔管率。尽管使用PS或ATC与HFNC进行的SBT增加了再插管率,PS与T型SBT的情况并非如此。
    The spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) technique that best balance successful extubation with the risk for reintubation is unknown. We sought to determine the comparative efficacy and safety of alternative SBT techniques.
    We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to February 2023 for randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing SBT techniques in critically ill adults and children and reported initial SBT success, successful extubation, reintubation (primary outcomes) and mortality (ICU, hospital, most protracted; secondary outcome) rates. Two reviewers screened, reviewed full-texts, and abstracted data. We performed frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis.
    We included 40 RCTs (6716 patients). Pressure Support (PS) versus T-piece SBTs was the most common comparison. Initial successful SBT rates were increased with PS [risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.05-1.11)], PS/automatic tube compensation (ATC) [1.12 (1.01 -1.25), high flow nasal cannulae (HFNC) [1.07 (1.00-1.13) (all moderate certainty), and ATC [RR 1.11, (1.03-1.20); low certainty] SBTs compared to T-piece SBTs. Similarly, initial successful SBT rates were increased with PS, ATC, and PS/ATC SBTs compared to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) SBTs. Successful extubation rates were increased with PS [RR 1.06, (1.03-1.09); high certainty], ATC [RR 1.13, (1.05-1.21); moderate certainty], and HFNC [RR 1.06, (1.02-1.11); high certainty] SBTs, compared to T-piece SBTs. There was little to no difference in reintubation rates with PS (vs. T-piece) SBTs [RR 1.05, (0.91-1.21); low certainty], but increased reintubation rates with PS [RR 2.84, (1.61-5.03); moderate certainty] and ATC [RR 2.95 (1.57-5.56); moderate certainty] SBTs compared to HFNC SBTs.
    SBTs conducted with pressure augmentation (PS, ATC, PS/ATC) versus without (T-piece, CPAP) increased initial successful SBT and successful extubation rates. Although SBTs conducted with PS or ATC versus HFNC increased reintubation rates, this was not the case for PS versus T-piece SBTs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:最近的荟萃分析和随机研究表明,在接受血管内血栓切除术的急性缺血性卒中患者中,与局部麻醉和镇静相比,机械通气全身麻醉具有更好的功能状态,他们推荐它的使用。但是一旦程序完成,拔管的最佳时刻是什么时候?目前,没有指南推荐拔管的最佳时机。机械通气时间延长可能与由于大多数麻醉药物产生的血管舒张而导致的肺炎或脑血流紊乱等并发症增加有关。然而,中风患者过早拔管可能导致躁动等并发症,迷失方向,废除了反射,血压突然波动,脑血流的改变,呼吸窘迫,支气管抽吸术,以及重新插管的需要。因此,我们设计了一项随机研究,假设在全身麻醉下血管内血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性卒中3个月后,早期与延迟拔管相比具有更好的功能结局。
    方法:该研究者发起,单中心,prospective,平行,评估盲化,优越性,随机对照试验将纳入178例前循环近端闭塞患者,在全身麻醉下成功进行血管内血栓切除术(TICI2b-3)治疗.患者将被随机分配接受手术后早期(<6小时)或延迟(6-12小时)拔管。主要结果指标是90天的功能独立性(mRS为0-2),用修改的Rankin评分(MRS)测量,范围从0(无症状)到6(死亡)。
    结论:这将是第一个比较全身麻醉下急性缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术后机械通气持续时间(早期和延迟拔管)效果的试验。
    背景:研究方案于2023年4月11日由圣地亚哥-卢戈研究伦理委员会(CEI-SL)批准,编号2023/127,并在临床试验.gov临床试验注册表中注册。NCT05847309。需要知情同意。参与者招募将于2023年4月18日开始。结果将提交给同行评审的期刊发表,并在一个或多个科学会议上发表。
    BACKGROUND: Recent meta-analyses and randomized studies have shown that among patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy, general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation is associated with better functional status compared to local anesthesia and sedation, and they recommend its use. But once the procedure is completed, when is the optimal moment for extubation? Currently, there are no guidelines recommending the optimal moment for extubation. Prolonged mechanical ventilation time could potentially be linked to increased complications such as pneumonia or disturbances in cerebral blood flow due to the vasodilatation produced by most anesthetic drugs. However, premature extubation in a patient who has suffered a stroke could led to complications such as agitation, disorientation, abolished reflexes, sudden fluctuations in blood pressure, alterations in cerebral blood flow, respiratory distress, bronchial aspiration, and the need for reintubation. We therefore designed a randomized study hypothesizing that early compared with delayed extubation is associated with a better functional outcome 3 months after endovascular thrombectomy treatment under general anesthesia for acute ischemic stroke.
    METHODS: This investigator-initiated, single-center, prospective, parallel, evaluated blinded, superiority, randomized controlled trial will include 178 patients with a proximal occlusion of the anterior circulation treated with successful endovascular thrombectomy (TICI 2b-3) under general anesthesia. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive early (< 6 h) or delayed (6-12 h) extubation after the procedure. The primary outcome measure is functional independence (mRS of 0-2) at 90 days, measured with the modified Rankin Score (mRS), ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death).
    CONCLUSIONS: This will be the first trial to compare the effect of mechanical ventilation duration (early vs delayed extubation) after satisfactory endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke under general anesthesia.
    BACKGROUND: The study protocol was approved April 11, 2023, by the by the Santiago-Lugo Research Ethics Committee (CEI-SL), number 2023/127, and was registered into the clinicaltrials.gov clinical trials registry with No. NCT05847309. Informed consent is required. Participant recruitment begins on April 18, 2023. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全身麻醉后出现躁动很常见,可能会导致不良后果,如损伤以及呼吸和循环并发症。全身麻醉后出现的躁动在鼻手术中比在其他外科手术中更常见。这项研究旨在评估在深度麻醉下或完全清醒时接受鼻手术的患者出现躁动的发生。
    方法:共202名患者(18-60岁,美国麻醉医师协会分类:I-II)在全身麻醉下进行鼻手术,随机分为两组:深拔管组(D组)和清醒拔管组(A组)。主要结果是出现躁动的发生率。次要结果包括出现波动的数量,镇静评分,生命体征,和不良事件的发生率。
    结果:D组苏醒期躁动发生率低于A组(34.7%vs.72.8%;p<0.001)。与A组相比,D组患者的里士满激动镇静量表评分较低,更高的Ramsay镇静评分,更少的激动发作,拔管时和手术后30分钟的平均动脉压降低,而这些指标在手术后90分钟没有差异。两组不良事件发生率无差异。
    结论:深度麻醉下拔管可显著减少全麻鼻部手术后苏醒期躁动,且不增加不良事件的发生率。
    背景:于2021年4月14日在Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT04844333)注册。
    BACKGROUND: Post-anesthetic emergence agitation is common after general anesthesia and may cause adverse consequences, such as injury as well as respiratory and circulatory complications. Emergence agitation after general anesthesia occurs more frequently in nasal surgery than in other surgical procedures. This study aimed to assess the occurrence of emergence agitation in patients undergoing nasal surgery who were extubated under deep anesthesia or when fully awake.
    METHODS: A total of 202 patients (18-60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification: I-II) undergoing nasal surgery under general anesthesia were randomized 1:1 into two groups: a deep extubation group (group D) and an awake extubation group (group A). The primary outcome was the incidence of emergence agitation. The secondary outcomes included number of emergence agitations, sedation score, vital signs, and incidence of adverse events.
    RESULTS: The incidence of emergence agitation was lower in group D than in group A (34.7% vs. 72.8%; p < 0.001). Compared to group A, patients in group D had lower Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores, higher Ramsay sedation scores, fewer agitation episodes, and lower mean arterial pressure when extubated and 30 min after surgery, whereas these indicators did not differ 90 min after surgery. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Extubation under deep anesthesia can significantly reduce emergence agitation after nasal surgery under general anesthesia without increasing the incidence of adverse events.
    BACKGROUND: Registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04844333) on 14/04/2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:没有客观指标来评估气管插管患者拔管期间的咳嗽强度。这项研究旨在确定咳嗽峰值呼气流量(CPEF)是否可以预测由于咳嗽强度降低而重新插管的风险。
    方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2020年9月1日至2021年8月31日期间入住急诊重症监护病房并接受人工通气管理≥24h的患者。患者分为两组:成功拔管组和重新插管组,探讨拔管前CPEF与再插管前CPEF的关系。
    结果:分析76例患者。在单变量分析中,成功拔管组(90.7±25.9L/min)和再插管组(57.2±6.4L/min)之间的CPEF差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。在以年龄和人工通气持续时间为协变量的多变量分析中,再插管组CPEF明显降低(p<0.01)。根据受试者工作特性曲线,再插管的CPEF截止值为60L/min(曲线下面积,0.897;灵敏度,78.5%;特异性,90.9%;p<0.01)。
    结论:气管插管患者的CPEF可能是预测与咳嗽强度降低相关的再插管风险的有用指标。由于咳嗽强度降低而重新插管的截止CPEF值为60L/min。
    BACKGROUND: No objective indicator exists for evaluating cough strength during extubation of tracheally intubated patients. This study aimed to determine whether cough peak expiratory flow (CPEF) can predict the risk of reintubation due to decreased cough strength.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who were admitted to our Emergency Intensive Care Unit between September 1, 2020 and August 31, 2021 and were under artificial ventilation management for ≥ 24 h. The patients were divided into two groups: successful extubation and reintubation groups, and the relationship between CPEF immediately before extubation and reintubation was investigated.
    RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were analyzed. In the univariate analysis, CPEF was significantly different between the successful extubation (90.7 ± 25.9 L/min) and reintubation (57.2 ± 6.4 L/min) groups (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis with age and duration of artificial ventilation as covariates, CPEF was significantly lower in the reintubation group (p < 0.01). The cutoff value of CPEF for reintubation according to the receiver operating characteristic curve was 60 L/min (area under the curve, 0.897; sensitivity, 78.5%; specificity, 90.9%; p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: CPEF in tracheally intubated patients may be a useful indicator for predicting the risk of reintubation associated with decreased cough strength. The cutoff CPEF value for reintubation due to decreased cough strength was 60 L/min.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号