apparent diffusion coefficient

表观扩散系数
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨ZOOM技术在退行性脊髓型颈椎病(DCM)患者中的临床应用,并与T2WI成像进行比较。
    方法:共纳入111例确诊为DCM的患者。根据MJOA,将DCM患者分为有神经功能障碍的ND+组和无神经功能障碍的ND-组。在3.0TMRI上进行常规MRI和ZOOM-DWI,以获得矢状位T2WI和表观扩散系数(ADC)图。测量狭窄段及其相邻上下段的ADC值,并在ND+和ND-组之间进行比较。分析颈脊髓ADC值与mJOA评分的相关性。此外,绘制ROC曲线以计算AUC值。
    结果:ND+和ND-组之间的比较表明,mJOA评分存在显着差异,T2WI,椎管前后径,ADC值较窄,上、下段(P<0.05)。在ND+组中,窄段及其上下段的ADC值之间存在显着差异(P<0.001),上段和下段ADC值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。相关分析结果表明,ND+组,通过mJOA评分评估的神经功能障碍与狭窄段的ADC值增加相关(r=-0.52,P<0.001),但与上下段的ADC值没有显着相关。此外,T2WI,椎管前后径,颈髓ADC值对评估DCM神经功能障碍均有诊断效能(AUC>0.5,P<0.05),窄段的ADC值是最优的。
    结论:通过小视野ZOOM-DWI获得的脊髓ADC值可用于评估DCM的神经功能障碍。优于传统的T2WI。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical application of zonally magnified oblique multislice (ZOOM) imaging technology in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and compare it with T2WI imaging.
    METHODS: A total of 111 patients diagnosed with DCM were recruited. According to mJOA, patients with DCM were divided into ND + group with neurological dysfunction and ND- group without neurological dysfunction. Routine MRI and ZOOM-DWI were performed on 3.0 T MRI to obtain sagittal T2WI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) diagram. ADC values of the narrow segment and its adjacent upper and lower segments were measured, and compared between the ND + and ND- groups. The correlation between ADC value of cervical spinal cord and mJOA score was analyzed. Additionally, ROC curves were plotted to calculate the AUC values.
    RESULTS: The comparison between ND + and ND- groups shows that there are significant differences in mJOA score, T2WI, anteroposterior diameter of spinal canal, ADC values of narrow, upper and lower segment (P < 0.05). In ND + group, there is a significant difference between ADC values of the narrow and its upper and lower segments (P < 0.001), while with no significant difference in ADC values of the upper and lower segments (P > 0.05). Results of correlation analysis indicate that in the ND + group, neurological dysfunction evaluated by mJOA scores is correlated with increased ADC values of the narrow segment (r = -0.52, P < 0.001), but not significantly correlated with ADC values of the upper and lower segments. Furthermore, T2WI, anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal, and cervical cord ADC values all has diagnostic efficacy in evaluating neurological dysfunction in DCM (AUC > 0.5, P < 0.05), with the ADC value of the narrow segment being optimal.
    CONCLUSIONS: The ADC value of spinal cord obtained by small-field ZOOM-DWI can be used to evaluate neurological dysfunction in DCM, and is superior to traditional T2WI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC),即使在国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)具有相同阶段分类的患者中,对放射疗法(RT)的治疗反应也可能存在显着差异。这项研究调查了ADC指标在预测接受RT治疗的LACC患者治疗结束时的价值。
    80例经病理证实的宫颈鳞状细胞癌(SCC)患者被纳入研究。对所有参与者进行腹部或盆腔MRI扫描至少三次:在RT之前,RT开始后3周和RT结束后约2个月.LACC的计算表观扩散系数(ADC)值包括:pre-ADC,临时ADC,ΔADC和Δ%ADC。根据实体瘤的反应评估标准(RECIST)1.1,计算受试者并随后将其分为良好反应者组(完全反应)和不良反应者组(进行性疾病,稳定的疾病或部分反应)。
    与反应良好的人相比,低反应组的受试者显示出显著较低的临时ADC值,ΔADC,和Δ%ADC(均P<0.05)。区分好的和差的反应者,临时ADC的最佳截止值,ΔADC,Δ%ADC确定为1.067×10-3mm2/sec,0.209×10-3mm2/sec,和30.74%使用ROC曲线,相应的灵敏度为83.78%,86.49%,75.68%,和88.37%的特异性,86.49%,75.68%,分别。多因素logistic回归显示,基线肿瘤直径和中期ADC是治疗反应的重要预后因素,基线肿瘤直径的比值比(OR)为0.105(95%置信区间[95%CI]0.018-0.616),中期ADC的比值比为42.896(95%CI8.205-224.262)。
    临时ADC值和基线肿瘤直径成为预测LACC患者对RT反应的可能指示因素。
    UNASSIGNED: For locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), treatment response to radiotherapy (RT) can vary significantly even among those with the same stage classification of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). This study investigated the value of ADC metric for forecasting end-of-treatment outcomes in LACC patients referred for RT.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighty patients with pathologically confirmed cervical squamous cell carcinoma with (SCC) were included in the research. Abdominal or pelvic MRI scans were conducted at least three times for all participants: before RT, three weeks after beginning of RT and approximately two months after RT was finalized. Calculated apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the LACC include: pre-ADC, interim-ADC, ΔADC and Δ%ADC. Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, subjects were calculated and subsequently categorized into good responders group (complete response) and poor responders group (progressive disease, stable disease or partial response).
    UNASSIGNED: Compared to good-responders, subjects of poor-responder group showed significantly lower values of interim-ADC, ΔADC, and Δ%ADC (all P < 0.05). To distinguish between good and poor responders, the optimal cutoff values of interim-ADC, ΔADC, and Δ%ADC were determined to be 1.067 × 10-3 mm2/sec, 0.209 × 10-3 mm2/sec, and 30.74 % using the ROC curve, with corresponding sensitivities of 83.78 %, 86.49 %, 75.68 %, and specificities of 88.37 %, 86.49 %, 75.68 %, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the baseline tumor diameter and interim-ADC were significant prognostic factors for treatment response with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.105 (95 % confidence interval [95 % CI] 0.018-0.616) for baseline tumor diameter and 42.896 (95 % CI 8.205-224.262) for interim-ADC.
    UNASSIGNED: The interim-ADC value and baseline tumor diameter surfaced as possible indicative factors for predicting the response to RT in patients with LACC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:开发并验证用于识别PI-RADS类别≥4个病灶且PSA≤20ng/ml的未经活检的患者的非前列腺癌(非PCa)的预测模型,以避免不必要的活检。
    方法:纳入2018年至2022年在华西医院接受会阴活检的符合条件的患者。将患者随机分为训练队列(70%)和验证队列(30%)。Logistic回归用于筛选非PCa的独立预测因子,并根据回归系数构建了列线图。通过C指数和校准图评估辨别和校准,分别。应用决策曲线分析(DCA)和临床影响曲线(CIC)来测量临床净效益。
    结果:共纳入1580例患者,634个非PCa。年龄,前列腺体积,前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD),表观扩散系数(ADC)和病变区是纳入最佳预测模型的独立预测因子,并构造了相应的列线图(https://nomogramscu。shinyapps.io/PI-RADS-4-5/)。该模型在验证队列中的C指数为0.931(95%CI,0.910-0.953)。DCA和CIC在广泛的阈值概率范围内显示出增加的净收益。无活检阈值为60%时,70%,80%,列线图能够避免74.0%,65.8%,和55.6%的不必要的活检对9.0%,5.0%,和3.6%的错过PCa(或35.9%,30.2%和25.1%的放弃活检,分别)。
    结论:开发的列线图具有良好的预测能力,临床实用性可以帮助识别非PCa,以支持临床决策并减少不必要的前列腺活检。
    OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a prediction model for identifying non-prostate cancer (non-PCa) in biopsy-naive patients with PI-RADS category ≥ 4 lesions and PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml to avoid unnecessary biopsy.
    METHODS: Eligible patients who underwent transperineal biopsies at West China Hospital between 2018 and 2022 were included. The patients were randomly divided into training cohort (70%) and validation cohort (30%). Logistic regression was used to screen for independent predictors of non-PCa, and a nomogram was constructed based on the regression coefficients. The discrimination and calibration were assessed by the C-index and calibration plots, respectively. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC) were applied to measure the clinical net benefit.
    RESULTS: A total of 1580 patients were included, with 634 non-PCa. Age, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and lesion zone were independent predictors incorporated into the optimal prediction model, and a corresponding nomogram was constructed ( https://nomogramscu.shinyapps.io/PI-RADS-4-5/ ). The model achieved a C-index of 0.931 (95% CI, 0.910-0.953) in the validation cohort. The DCA and CIC demonstrated an increased net benefit over a wide range of threshold probabilities. At biopsy-free thresholds of 60%, 70%, and 80%, the nomogram was able to avoid 74.0%, 65.8%, and 55.6% of unnecessary biopsies against 9.0%, 5.0%, and 3.6% of missed PCa (or 35.9%, 30.2% and 25.1% of foregone biopsies, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: The developed nomogram has favorable predictive capability and clinical utility can help identify non-PCa to support clinical decision-making and reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨术前磁共振成像(MRI)对颅内孤立性纤维瘤(ISFT)的诊断价值,并评估术前MRI特征对病理分级的预测价值。
    方法:本回顾性分析了我院55例ISFT患者的临床和术前MRI表现,其中经术后病理证实为II级27例,III级28例。变量包括年龄,性别,肿瘤位置,跨中线状态,T1加权成像(T1WI)的信号特性,T2加权成像(T2WI),T2-流体衰减反演恢复(T2-FLAIR),和弥散加权成像(DWI),瘤周水肿,病灶内出血,局灶性坏死/囊性变性,肿瘤空血管,肿瘤最大直径,最大值,minimum,和表观扩散系数的平均值(ADCmax,ADCmin,和ADCmean),肿瘤增强模式,脑膜尾征,头骨入侵,脑实质侵犯,静脉窦受累.采用独立样本t检验或Mann-WhitneyU检验比较两组间的连续性数据,采用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验比较分类数据。此外,进行双变量logistic回归构建综合模型,和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以计算曲线下面积(AUC),从而确定II级和III级ISFT的鉴别诊断中每个参数的值。
    结果:II级和III级ISFT患者的平均发病年龄相似(46.77±14.66岁和45.82±12.07岁,分别)。II级和III级ISFT患者中男性的比例略高于女性患者(男性/女性:1.25[15/12]和1.33[16/12],分别)。在T2-FLAIR和DWI信号特征方面,II级和III级ISFT之间存在显着差异,最大值,minimum,和表观扩散系数的平均值(ADCmax,ADCmin,和ADCmean),肿瘤位置,和颅骨侵犯(分别为P=0.001,P=0.018,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.010和P=0.032)。然而,II级和III级ISFT之间的年龄没有显着差异,性别,跨中线状态,T1WI和T2WI信号特性,瘤周水肿,病灶内出血,局灶性坏死/囊性变性,肿瘤空血管阴影,增强模式,脑膜尾征,肿瘤最大直径,脑实质侵入,或静脉窦受累(均P>0.05)。此外,二元logistic回归分析显示,当ADCmin纳入回归方程时,模型准确率为89.1%。此外,ROC曲线分析表明,ADCmin的AUC为0.805(0.688,0.922),灵敏度为74.1%,特异性为75.0%,截止值为672mm2/s。
    结论:III级ISFT患者比II级患者表现出更多的混合T2-FLAIR信号特征和DWI信号特征,如更高的颅骨浸润和肿瘤肿块塌陷中线分布和更低的ADCmax所示,ADCmean,和ADCmin值。ADCmin值在II级和III级ISFT的术前分配中具有显著意义,从而有助于提高疾病的影像分级诊断的准确性。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characterization of intracranial solitary fibrous tumors (ISFT) and to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative MRI features in predicting pathological grading.
    METHODS: This retrospective analysis comprised the clinical and preoperative MRI characterization of 55 patients with ISFT in our hospital, including 27 grade II cases and 28 grade III cases confirmed by postoperative pathology. Variables included age, sex, tumor location, cross-midline status, signal characteristics of T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR), and diffusion‑weighted imaging (DWI), peritumoral edema, intralesional hemorrhage, focal necrosis/cystic degeneration, tumor empty vessel, maximum tumor diameter, maximum, minimum, and average values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmax, ADCmin, and ADCmean), tumors enhancement mode, meningeal tail sign, skull invasion, cerebral parenchymal invasion, and venous sinus involvement. The independent samples t test or Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare continuous data between the two groups, and the Pearson chi-squared test or Fisher\'s exact test was used to compare categorical data. In addition, bivariate logistic regression was performed to construct a comprehensive model, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to calculate the areas under the curve (AUCs), thereby determining the value of each parameter in the differential diagnosis of grades II and III ISFT.
    RESULTS: The mean age at onset was similar between patients with grades II and III ISFT (46.77 ± 14.66 years and 45.82 ± 12.07 years, respectively). The proportions of men among patients with grades II and III ISFT were slightly higher than those of female patients (male/female: 1.25 [15/12] and 1.33 [16/12], respectively). There were significant differences between grades II and III ISFT in the T2-FLAIR and DWI signal characteristics, maximum, minimum, and average values of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmax, ADCmin, and ADCmean), tumor location, and skull invasion (P = 0.001, P = 0.018, P = 0.000, P = 0.000, P = 0.000, P = 0.010, and P = 0.032, respectively). However, no significant differences were noted between grades II and III ISFT in age, sex, cross-midline status, T1WI and T2WI signal characteristics, peritumoral edema, intralesional hemorrhage, focal necrosis/cystic degeneration, tumor empty vessel shadow, enhancement mode, meningeal tail sign, maximum tumor diameter, brain parenchyma invasion, or venous sinus involvement (all P > 0.05). Moreover, binary logistic regression analysis showed that the model accuracy was 89.1% when ADCmin was included in the regression equation. Moreover, ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of ADCmin was 0.805 (0.688, 0.922), sensitivity was 74.1%, specificity was 75.0%, and the cutoff value was 672 mm2/s.
    CONCLUSIONS: Grade III ISFT patients displayed more mixed T2-FLAIR signal characteristics and DWI signal characteristics than grade II patients, as shown by higher skull invasion and tumor mass collapse midline distribution and lower ADCmax, ADCmean, and ADCmin values. The ADCmin value was significant in the preoperative assignment of grades II and III ISFT, thereby contributing to enhanced accuracy in the imaging grading diagnosis of the disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们探讨了使用总肿瘤表观扩散系数(ttADC)直方图参数预测多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者高危细胞遗传学异常(HRCA)的可行性,并比较了基于这些参数的图像预测模型与基于这些参数和临床指标的组合预测模型的性能。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了92例MM患者基于全身扩散加权图像(WB-DWI)和临床指标的ttADC直方图的参数。根据荧光原位杂交结果将患者分为HRCA组和非HRCA组。采用Logistic回归分析构建图像预测和组合预测模型。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)来评估模型的性能以识别HRCA。采用DeLong检验比较各预测模型的AUC差异。
    结果:Logistic回归分析结果显示,ttADC直方图参数,ttADC熵<7.959(OR:39.167;95%置信区间[CI]:3.891-394.208;P<0.05),是HRCA的独立危险因素。图像预测模型由ttADC熵和ttADCSD组成。组合预测模型包括ttADC熵以及患者临床指标,如生物学性别和M蛋白百分比。图像预测和组合预测模型的AUC分别为0.739和0.811(P<0.05)。图像预测模型显示灵敏度为73.9%,特异性为68.1%。组合预测模型的敏感性为82.6%,特异性为72.5%。
    结论:使用基于WB-DWI图像的ttADC直方图参数来预测MM患者的HRCA是可行的,并且将ttADC参数与临床指标相结合可以取得更好的预测性能。
    OBJECTIVE: We explored the feasibility of using total tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ttADC) histogram parameters to predict high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCA) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and compared the performance of an image prediction model based on these parameters with that of a combined prediction model based on these parameters and clinical indicators.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the parameters of the ttADC histogram based on whole-body diffusion-weighted images(WB-DWI) and clinical indicators in 92 patients with MM. The patients were divided into HRCA and non-HRCA groups according to the results of the fluorescence in situ hybridization. Logistic regression analysis was used to construct the image prediction and combined prediction models. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of the models to identify HRCA. The DeLong test was used to compare the AUC differences of each prediction model.
    RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis results revealed that the ttADC histogram parameter, ttADC entropy < 7.959 (OR: 39.167; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.891-394.208; P < 0.05), was an independent risk factor for HRCA. The image prediction model consisted of ttADC entropy and ttADC SD. The combined prediction model included ttADC entropy along with patient clinical indicators such as biological sex and M protein percentage. The AUCs of the image prediction and combined prediction models were 0.739 and 0.811, respectively (P < .05). The image prediction model showed a sensitivity of 73.9% and a specificity of 68.1%. The combined prediction model showed 82.6% sensitivity and 72.5% specificity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using ttADC histogram parameters based on WB-DWI images to predict HRCA in patients with MM is feasible, and combining ttADC parameters with clinical indicators can achieve better predictive performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨临床影像学指标在前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)3类病变中诊断前列腺癌(PCa)和有临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa)的可行性和有效性。
    方法:对诊断为PI-RADS3的病变进行回顾性分析。它们被归类为良性的,非csPCa和csPCa组。表观扩散系数(ADC),T2加权成像信号强度(T2WISI),ADC和T2WISI的变异系数,前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD),ADC密度(ADCD),测量并计算前列腺特异性抗原病变体积密度(PSAVD)和ADC病变体积密度(ADCVD).使用单变量和多变量分析来确定与PCa和csPCa相关的危险因素。利用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)和决策曲线评估独立危险因素的疗效和净收益。
    结果:在202名患者中,133人患有良性前列腺疾病,25个非csPCa和44个csPCa。年龄,PSA和病变部位组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。T2WISI和ADC变异系数(ADCcv)是PI-RADS3病变PCa的独立危险因素,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.68。ADC是PI-RADS3病变中csPCa的独立危险因素,产生0.65的AUC。决策曲线分析显示,在一定的概率阈值下,患者的净获益。
    结论:T2WISI和ADCcv,随着ADC,分别在增强PI-RADS3病变中PCa和csPCa的诊断方面显示出相当大的希望。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility and efficacy of clinical-imaging metrics in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) category 3 lesions.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on lesions diagnosed as PI-RADS 3. They were categorized into benign, non-csPCa and csPCa groups. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), T2-weighted imaging signal intensity (T2WISI), coefficient of variation of ADC and T2WISI, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), ADC density (ADCD), prostate-specific antigen lesion volume density (PSAVD) and ADC lesion volume density (ADCVD) were measured and calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with PCa and csPCa. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and decision curves were utilized to assess the efficacy and net benefit of independent risk factors.
    RESULTS: Among 202 patients, 133 had benign prostate disease, 25 non-csPCa and 44 csPCa. Age, PSA and lesion location showed no significant differences (P > 0.05) among the groups. T2WISI and coefficient of variation of ADC (ADCcv) were independent risk factors for PCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68. ADC was an independent risk factor for csPCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions, yielding an AUC of 0.65. Decision curve analysis showed net benefit for patients at certain probability thresholds.
    CONCLUSIONS: T2WISI and ADCcv, along with ADC, respectively showed considerable promise in enhancing the diagnosis of PCa and csPCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:准确预测肝细胞癌(HCC)分级可能有助于合理选择治疗策略。乙氧基苯二亚乙基三胺五乙酸(Gd-EOB-DTPA)增强T1映射和表观扩散系数(ADC)值预测HCC等级的组合的诊断功效需要进一步验证。
    目的:本研究旨在评估Gd-EOB-DTPA增强的T1映射能力和ADC值,无论是单独还是组合,区分不同等级的HCC。
    方法:2017年7月至2020年2月,96例患者(男性,83岁;平均年龄,53.67岁;年龄范围,29-71岁)临床诊断为HCC被纳入本研究。所有患者均接受Gd-EOB-DTPA增强磁共振成像(MRI,包括T1映射序列)在手术或活检之前。根据病理结果分为3组(其中高分化肝癌24例,59例中分化肝癌,13例和低分化的HCC)。计算并比较不同分级HCC组之间的平均Gd-EOB-DTPA增强T1值(&#916;T1=[(T1pre-T1post)/T1pre]×100%)和ADC值。特征曲线下面积(AUC),诊断阈值,灵敏度,并分析了ΔT1和ADC对鉴别诊断的特异性。
    结果:高分化的HCC的平均值&#916;T1为58%,中等分化的HCC为50%,分化差的HCC为43%。ΔT1显示各组间有统计学差异(P<0.001)。3组的平均ADC值为1.11×10-3mm2/s,0.91×10-3mm2/s,0.80×10-3mm2/s,分别。ADC组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。在区分高分化组和中分化组时,ΔT1的AUC为0.751(95%CI:0.642,0.859),ADC的AUC为0.782(95%CI:0.671,0.894),联合模型的AUC为0.811(95%CI:0.709,0.914)。在区分低分化组和中分化组时,ΔT1的AUC为0.768(95%CI:0.634,0.902),ADC的AUC为0.754(95%CI:0.603,0.904),联合模型的AUC为0.841(95%CI:0.729,0.953)。
    结论:Gd-EOB-DTPA增强T1作图,和ADC值对识别不同HCC分级的敏感性和特异性具有互补作用。Gd-EOB-DTPA增强MRIT1映射和ADC值的组合模型可以提高预测HCC分级的诊断性能。

    BACKGROUND: Accurately predicting the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) grade may facilitate the rational selection of treatment strategies. The diagnostic efficacy of the combination of Gadolinium ethoxybenzy diethylenetriamine pentaacetic (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhancement T1 mapping and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in predicting HCC grade needs further validation.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the capacity of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1 mapping and ADC values, both individually and in combination, to discriminate between different grades of HCC.
    METHODS: From July 2017 to February 2020, 96 patients (male, 83; mean age, 53.67 years; age range, 29-71 years) clinically diagnosed with HCC were included in the present study. All patients underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, including T1 mapping sequence) before surgery or biopsy. All the patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the pathological results (including 24 cases of well-differentiated HCCs, 59 cases of moderately differentiated HCCs, 13 cases of and poorly differentiated HCCs). The mean Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1 values (ΔT1=[(T1pre-T1post)/T1pre]×100%) and ADC values between different grading groups of HCC were calculated and compared. The area under the characteristics curve (AUC), the diagnostic threshold, sensitivity, and specificity of ΔT1 and ADC for differential diagnosis were analyzed.
    RESULTS: Mean ΔT1 was 58% for well-differentiated HCCs, 50% for moderately-differentiated HCCs, and 43% for poorly-differentiated HCCs. ΔT1 showed statistical differences between the groups (P<0.001). The mean ADC values of the 3 groups were 1.11×10-3 mm2/s, 0.91×10-3 mm2/s, and 0.80×10-3mm2/s, respectively. ADC showed statistical differences between the groups (P<0.001). In discriminating well- differentiated group from the moderately differentiated group, the AUC of ΔT1 was 0.751 (95% CI: 0.642, 0.859), the AUC of ADC was 0.782 (95% CI: 0.671, 0.894), the AUC of combined model was 0.811 (95% CI: 0.709, 0.914). In discriminating the poorly differentiated group from the moderately differentiated group, the AUC of ΔT1 was 0.768 (95% CI: 0.634, 0.902), the AUC of ADC was 0.754 (95% CI: 0.603, 0.904), and the AUC of the combined model was 0.841 (95% CI: 0.729, 0.953).
    CONCLUSIONS: Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1 mapping, and ADC values have complementary effects on the sensitivity and specificity for identifying different HCC grades. A combined model of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI T1 mapping and ADC values could improve diagnostic performance for predicting HCC grades.

    .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:基于表观扩散系数(ADC)图像,建立了一个列线图模型来准确预测与腮腺多形性腺瘤(PAP)复发相关的高危包膜特征.
    方法:这项回顾性研究分析了190例PAP患者。通过单变量差异分析和多变量回归分析确定了重要的临床放射学因素。通过分析整个肿瘤的平均ADC值确定最佳阈值,使用最佳Youden指数和敏感性分析,并据此勾画肿瘤亚区域。针对整个肿瘤和高/低ADC区域构建了三个影像组学模型,通过统计分析确定的最佳模型。最终,通过将高危包膜特征的独立预测因子与最佳影像组学预测评分相结合,构建了列线图模型.通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROCAUC)综合评估模型性能,准确度,灵敏度,和特异性。
    结果:最佳ADC分割阈值为1.25×10-3mm2/s。多变量分析将高ADC区体积百分比确定为具有高风险囊膜特征的PAP的独立预测因子。基于低ADC肿瘤亚区域的影像组学模型是最佳的(AUC0.899)。列线图模型,结合独立预测因子和最佳成像研究预测评分,表现出高性能(AUC0.909)。决策曲线分析证实了列线图的临床适用性。
    结论:由ADC定量成像构建的列线图模型可以预测具有高危包膜特征的PAP患者。这些患者需要术中预防措施,以避免肿瘤溢出和残留,以及延长术后随访时间。
    OBJECTIVE: Based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) images, a nomogram model is established to accurately predict the high-risk capsular characteristics associated with pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland (PAP) recurrence.
    METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 190 patients with PAPs. Significant clinical radiological factors were identified through univariate difference analysis and multivariate regression analysis. The optimal threshold was determined by analyzing the average ADC value of the entire tumor, using the best Youden index and sensitivity analysis, and tumor subregions were delineated accordingly. Three radiomic models were constructed for the whole tumor and for high/low ADC areas, with the best model determined through statistical analysis. Ultimately, a nomogram model was constructed by combining the independent predictive factor of high-risk capsular features with the optimal radiomic predictive score. Model performance was comprehensively assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
    RESULTS: The best ADC division threshold as 1.25 × 10-3 mm2/s. Multivariate analysis identified High-ADC Zone Volume Percentage as an independent predictor for PAPs with high-risk capsular characteristics. The radiomic model based on the low ADC tumor subregion was optimal (AUC 0.899). The nomogram model, combining independent predictors and optimal imaging studies predictive score, demonstrated high performance (AUC 0.909). Decision curve analysis confirmed the nomogram\'s clinical applicability.
    CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram model constructed from ADC quantitative imaging can predict PAPs patients with high-risk capsular features. These patients require intraoperative preventive measures to avoid tumor spillage and residuals, as well as extended postoperative follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    早期肿瘤反应预测可以帮助避免不必要的化疗疗程的过度治疗。重要的是要确定多个表观扩散系数指数(S指数,ADC-diff)可有效预测乳腺癌(BC)对新辅助化疗(NAC)的病理反应。II期和III期BCs患者接受T1WI,弥散加权成像(DWI),包括使用3T系统的动态对比增强MRI。他们分为两组:主要组织学反应者(MHRs,米勒-佩恩G4/5)和非主要组织学反应者(nMHR,米勒-佩恩G1-3)。三个b值用于DWI以导出S指数;使用b=0和1000s/mm2获得ADC-diff值。计算并比较治疗后S指数和ADC-diff值的不同四分位数范围。在基线时以及在两个和四个NAC周期后进行评估。共评估59例患者。S指数参数和ADC-diff值的四分位数范围与组织病理学预后因素(例如雌激素受体和人表皮生长因子受体2表达,所有p<0.05),但孕激素受体阳性和阴性或Ki-67肿瘤的S指数参数或ADC-diff值的其他四分位数范围均无明显差异(均P>0.05)。两组的动态增强MRI特征无差异。在NAC前筛选出HER-2表达和S指数分布的峰度作为预测MHR组的独立危险因素(p<0.05,曲线下面积(AUC)=0.811)。在早期NAC(两个周期)之后,两组之间只有10百分位数S指数有统计学意义(p<0.05,AUC=0.714)。两组在NAC任何时间点的ADC-diff值均无显著差异(P>0.1)。这些发现表明,S指数值可用作BC对NAC病理反应的早期预测指标;ADC-diff作为NAC成像生物标志物的价值需要通过正在进行的多中心前瞻性试验进一步证实。
    Early tumor response prediction can help avoid overtreatment with unnecessary chemotherapy sessions. It is important to determine whether multiple apparent diffusion coefficient indices (S index, ADC-diff) are effective in the early prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC). Patients with stage II and III BCs who underwent T1WI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a 3 T system were included. They were divided into two groups: major histological responders (MHRs, Miller-Payne G4/5) and nonmajor histological responders (nMHRs, Miller-Payne G1-3). Three b values were used for DWI to derive the S index; ADC-diff values were obtained using b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2. The different interquartile ranges of percentile S-index and ADC-diff values after treatment were calculated and compared. The assessment was performed at baseline and after two and four NAC cycles. A total of 59 patients were evaluated. There are some correlations of interquartile ranges of S-index parameters and ADC-diff values with histopathological prognostic factors (such as estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression, all p < 0.05), but no significant differences were found in some other interquartile ranges of S-index parameters or ADC-diff values between progesterone receptor positive and negative or for Ki-67 tumors (all P > 0.05). No differences were found in the dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI characteristics between the two groups. HER-2 expression and kurtosis of the S-index distribution were screened out as independent risk factors for predicting MHR group (p < 0.05, area under the curve (AUC) = 0.811) before NAC. After early NAC (two cycles), only the 10th percentile S index was statistically significant between the two groups (p < 0.05, AUC = 0.714). No significant differences were found in ADC-diff value at any time point of NAC between the two groups (P > 0.1). These findings demonstrate that the S-index value may be used as an early predictor of pathological response to NAC in BC; the value of ADC-diff as an imaging biomarker of NAC needs to be further confirmed by ongoing multicenter prospective trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究探讨了整个肿瘤表观扩散系数(ADC)直方图参数和磁共振成像(MRI)语义特征在预测脑膜瘤孕激素受体(PR)表达中的价值。
    方法:成像,病态,回顾性分析53例PR阴性脑膜瘤和52例PR阳性脑膜瘤的临床资料。使用Firevoxel软件对整个肿瘤进行了概述,计算了ADC直方图参数。比较两组ADC直方图参数和MRI语义特征的差异。使用受试者工作特征曲线评估PR表达参数的预测值。还分析了整个肿瘤ADC直方图参数与脑膜瘤中PR表达之间的相关性。
    结果:分级能够预测脑膜瘤中PR的表达(p=0.012),尽管MRI的语义特征没有(均p>0.05)。意思是,Perc.01,Perc.05,Perc.10,Perc.25和Perc.50直方图参数能够预测脑膜瘤PR表达(所有p<0.05)。组合直方图参数的预测性能得到改善,等级和直方图参数的组合提供了最佳的预测值,曲线下面积为0.849(95CI:0.766-0.911),灵敏度,特异性,ACC,PPV,净现值为73.08%,81.13%,77.14%,79.20%,75.40%,分别。意思是,Perc.01、Perc.05、Perc.10、Perc.25和Perc.50直方图参数与PR表达呈正相关(均p<0.05)。
    结论:整个肿瘤ADC直方图参数在预测脑膜瘤中PR表达方面具有额外的临床价值。
    OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the value of whole tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram parameters and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) semantic features in predicting meningioma progesterone receptor (PR) expression.
    METHODS: The imaging, pathological, and clinical data of 53 patients with PR-negative meningiomas and 52 patients with PR-positive meningiomas were retrospectively reviewed. The whole tumor was outlined using Firevoxel software, and the ADC histogram parameters were calculated. The differences in ADC histogram parameters and MRI semantic features were compared between the two groups. The predictive values of parameters for PR expression were assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. The correlation between whole-tumor ADC histogram parameters and PR expression in meningiomas was also analyzed.
    RESULTS: Grading was able to predict the PR expression in meningiomas (p = 0.012), though the semantic features of MRI were not (all p > 0.05). The mean, Perc.01, Perc.05, Perc.10, Perc.25, and Perc.50 histogram parameters were able to predict meningioma PR expression (all p < 0.05). The predictive performance of the combined histogram parameters improved, and the combination of grade and histogram parameters provided the optimal predictive value, with an area under the curve of 0.849 (95%CI: 0.766-0.911) and sensitivity, specificity, ACC, PPV, and NPV of 73.08%, 81.13%, 77.14%, 79.20%, and 75.40%, respectively. The mean, Perc.01, Perc.05, Perc.10, Perc.25, and Perc.50 histogram parameters were positively correlated with PR expression (all p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Whole tumor ADC histogram parameters have additional clinical value in predicting PR expression in meningiomas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号