apparent diffusion coefficient

表观扩散系数
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定影响前列腺癌(PCa)定量成像生物标志物ADC和ADCratio诊断性能的因素。
    方法:在Embase进行了系统的文献检索,Medline和WebofScience,对于评估PCa诊断的ADC值和ADCratio的研究,使用相同的患者队列,并使用组织病理学参考作为地面实况。集合敏感性,特殊性,总结ROC曲线和AUC由构建的列支数据表计算.使用双变量混合效应模型定量汇集诊断性能(AUC)。为了识别影响因素,亚组分析,研究了发表偏倚和异质性评估。
    结果:13项研究,涉及1038名患者和1441个病灶,包括在内。对于ADC,合并的敏感性和特异性分别为80%(95%CI:74-85%)和78%(95%CI:70-85%),分别。对于ADCratio,合并的敏感性和特异性分别为80%(95%CI:74-84%)和80%(95%CI:71-87%)。汇总ROC分析显示AUC为0.86(95%CI:0.83-0.89)和0.86(95%CI:0.83-0.89),分别。Meta回归显示两种成像生物标志物之间的异质性。亚组分析显示,当包括周围区和移行区病变时,与ADC相比,ADC比率提高了诊断性能(AUC:0.87[95%CI:0.84-0.90]和0.82[95%CI:0.79-0.85],分别)。
    结论:ADC和ADCratio成像生物标志物在PCa诊断中均显示出良好且可比的诊断性能。然而,ADCratio在诊断过渡区癌症方面显示出比ADC更好的诊断性能。
    结论:在基于MRI的定量PCa诊断中,影像学生物标志物ADCratio可用于具有挑战性的病变MRI读数.更好地了解定量成像生物标志物的性能可以帮助诊断MRI方案,提高PCa评估的准确性。
    结论:基于MRI扩散加权成像的ADC和ADCratio在PCa评估中具有相当的诊断性能。与ADC相比,ADCratio提高了诊断性能,当评估整个腺体病变时。与ADCratio相比,在评估外周区病变时,ADC显示出增强的诊断性能.
    OBJECTIVE: To identify factors influencing the diagnostic performance of the quantitative imaging biomarkers ADC and ADCratio in prostate cancer (PCa) detection.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline and Web of Science, for studies evaluating ADC values and ADCratio for PCa diagnosis, using the same patient cohorts and using histopathological references as ground truth. Pooled sensitivities, specificities, summary ROC curves and AUCs were calculated from constructed contingency data tables. Diagnostic performance (AUC) was quantitatively pooled using a bivariate mixed effects model. For identifying influencing factors, subgroup analysis, publication bias and heterogeneity assessment were investigated.
    RESULTS: Thirteen studies, involving 1038 patients and 1441 lesions, were included. For ADC, the pooled sensitivity and specificity was 80% (95% CI: 74-85%) and 78% (95% CI: 70-85%), respectively. For ADCratio pooled sensitivity and specificity was 80% (95% CI: 74-84%) and 80% (95% CI: 71-87%). Summary ROC analysis revealed AUCs of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89), respectively. Meta-regression showed heterogeneity between both imaging biomarkers. Subgroup analysis showed that ADCratio improved diagnostic performance in comparison to ADC when including both peripheral and transitional zone lesions (AUC: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.84-0.90] and 0.82 [95% CI: 0.79-0.85], respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: Both ADC and ADCratio imaging biomarkers showed good and comparable diagnostic performance in PCa diagnosis. However, ADCratio shows better diagnostic performance than ADC in diagnosing transition zone cancers.
    CONCLUSIONS: In quantitative MRI-based PCa diagnosis, the imaging biomarker ADCratio is useful in challenging MRI readings of lesions. Understanding the performance of quantitative imaging biomarkers better can aid diagnostic MRI protocols, enhancing the precision of PCa assessments.
    CONCLUSIONS: MRI diffusion-weighted imaging-based ADC and ADCratio have comparable diagnostic performance in PCa assessment. In contrast to ADC, the ADCratio improves diagnostic performance, when assessing whole gland lesions. Compared to ADCratio, the ADC demonstrates enhanced diagnostic performance when evaluating peripheral zone lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)是口咽鳞癌(OPSCC)的重要风险因子。HPV阳性(HPV+)病例与不同的病理生理学相关,微观结构,和与HPV阴性(HPV-)病例相比的预后。这篇综述旨在研究磁共振成像(MRI)在OPSCC患者中区分HPV和HPV肿瘤并预测HPV状态的潜力。2022年12月15日在EMBASE上进行了系统的文献检索,MEDLINE所有,WebofScience,和Cochrane根据PRISMA指南。包括28项研究(n=2634例患者)。五、十九,和七项研究调查了结构MRI(例如,T1,T2加权),弥散加权磁共振成像,和其他序列,分别。四分之三的研究发现HPV+肿瘤的大小明显较小,和他们的淋巴结转移更多的囊性结构比HPV。13项研究中有11项发现HPV-原发性肿瘤的平均表观扩散系数明显高于HPV+原发性肿瘤。其他序列需要进一步调查。14项研究使用MRI预测HPV状态,使用临床,放射学,和影像组学特征。报告的曲线下面积(AUC)值在0.697和0.944之间。MRI可潜在地用于发现HPV+和HPV-OPSCC患者之间的差异并以合理的准确性预测HPV状态。在临床实施之前,需要使用独立数据集进行外部模型验证的大型研究。
    Human papillomavirus (HPV) is an important risk factor for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). HPV-positive (HPV+) cases are associated with a different pathophysiology, microstructure, and prognosis compared to HPV-negative (HPV-) cases. This review aimed to investigate the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to discriminate between HPV+ and HPV- tumours and predict HPV status in OPSCC patients. A systematic literature search was performed on 15 December 2022 on EMBASE, MEDLINE ALL, Web of Science, and Cochrane according to PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-eight studies (n = 2634 patients) were included. Five, nineteen, and seven studies investigated structural MRI (e.g., T1, T2-weighted), diffusion-weighted MRI, and other sequences, respectively. Three out of four studies found that HPV+ tumours were significantly smaller in size, and their lymph node metastases were more cystic in structure than HPV- ones. Eleven out of thirteen studies found that the mean apparent diffusion coefficient was significantly higher in HPV- than HPV+ primary tumours. Other sequences need further investigation. Fourteen studies used MRI to predict HPV status using clinical, radiological, and radiomics features. The reported areas under the curve (AUC) values ranged between 0.697 and 0.944. MRI can potentially be used to find differences between HPV+ and HPV- OPSCC patients and predict HPV status with reasonable accuracy. Larger studies with external model validation using independent datasets are needed before clinical implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Evaluation Study
    目的:喉癌和下咽癌(LC/HPC)约占头颈部癌的24%,导致全球每年超过9万人死亡。扩散加权成像(DWI)目前在肿瘤成像中被广泛研究,可以帮助区分细胞肿瘤与其他组织。我们的目标是回顾DWI在三个方面的有效性:诊断,预测预后,并预测LC/HPC患者的治疗反应。
    方法:在PubMed中进行了系统搜索,WebofScience,和Embase。通过计算标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)对诊断研究进行荟萃分析。
    结果:共纳入16项研究。所有诊断研究(n=9)都能够区分LC/HPC和其他良性喉/下咽病变。这些研究发现LC/HPC具有比非癌性病变更低的表观扩散系数(ADC)值。我们对7项诊断研究的荟萃分析,提供恶性和非恶性组织的ADC值,与非恶性病变相比,LC/HPC的ADC值显着降低(SMD=-1.71,95CI:[-2.00,-1.42],ADC截止值=1.2×103mm2/s)。此外,在预测预后的研究中,67%(4/6)基于治疗前ADC值准确预测结果。同样,在预测治疗反应的研究中,50%(2/4)基于预处理ADC值成功预测结果。总的来说,观察LC/HPC预后或治疗反应的研究发现,喉/下咽治疗前ADC值与良好结局之间存在正相关.
    结论:DWI对LC/HPC诊断有显著帮助。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定DWI在预测LC/HPC患者预后和治疗反应方面的可靠性.
    OBJECTIVE: Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Carcinomas (LC/HPC) constitute about 24 % of head and neck cancers, causing more than 90,000 annual deaths worldwide. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI), is currently widely studied in oncologic imaging and can aid in distinguishing cellular tumors from other tissues. Our objective was to review the effectiveness of DWI in three areas: diagnosing, predicting prognosis, and predicting treatment response in patients with LC/HPC.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. A meta-analysis by calculating Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) and 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) was conducted on diagnostic studies.
    RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were included. All diagnostic studies (n = 9) were able to differentiate between the LC/HPC and other benign laryngeal/hypopharyngeal lesions. These studies found that LC/HPC had lower Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values than non-cancerous lesions. Our meta-analysis of 7 diagnostic studies, that provided ADC values of malignant and non-malignant tissues, demonstrated significantly lower ADC values in LC/HPC compared to non-malignant lesions (SMD = -1.71, 95 %CI: [-2.00, -1.42], ADC cut-off = 1.2 × 103 mm2/s). Furthermore, among the studies predicting prognosis, 67 % (4/6) accurately predicted outcomes based on pretreatment ADC values. Similarly, among studies predicting treatment response, 50 % (2/4) successfully predicted outcomes based on pretreatment ADC values. Overall, the studies that looked at prognosis or treatment response in LC/HPC found a positive correlation between pretreatment ADC values in larynx/hypopharynx and favorable outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: DWI aids significantly in the LC/HPC diagnosis. However, further research is needed to establish DWI\'s reliability in predicting prognosis and treatment response in patients with LC/HPC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:头颈部结外淋巴瘤和鳞状细胞癌之间的放射学区分通常很困难,因为它们相似。
    目的:评估从扩散加权成像(DWI)计算的表观扩散系数(ADC)在区分两者中的诊断益处。
    方法:通过搜索MEDLINE进行系统评价,Scopus,和Embase数据库符合2020年系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)声明的首选报告项目。计算森林地块和ADC值的合并平均差,以描述头颈部结外淋巴瘤与鳞状细胞癌之间的关系。使用CochraneQ检验和I2统计量评估研究之间的异质性。
    结果:该综述确定了有440例患者(441个病灶)的8项研究符合荟萃分析的条件。在所有研究中,鳞状细胞癌的平均ADC值为0.88×10-3mm2/s,淋巴瘤的平均ADC值为0.64×10-3mm2/s。在荟萃分析中,淋巴瘤的ADC值显着低于鳞状细胞癌(合并平均差=0.235,95%置信区间[CI]=0.168-0.302,P<0.0001)。CochraneQ检验(卡方=55.7,P<0.0001)和I2统计量(I2=87.4%,95%CI=77.4-93.0%)显示显著异质性。
    结论:本研究强调了ADC的定量评估对头颈部淋巴结外淋巴瘤和鳞状细胞癌之间客观和可靠的鉴别的价值。由于研究数据的异质性,结论应谨慎解释。
    BACKGROUND: Radiological differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck is often difficult due to their similarities.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic benefit of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculated from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating the two.
    METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Forest plots and the pooled mean difference of ADC values were calculated to describe the relationship between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic.
    RESULTS: The review identified eight studies with 440 patients (441 lesions) eligible for meta-analysis. Among all studies, the mean ADC values of squamous cell carcinoma was 0.88 × 10-3mm2/s and that of lymphoma was 0.64 × 10-3mm2/s. In the meta-analysis, the ADC value of lymphoma was significantly lower than that of squamous cell carcinoma (pooled mean difference = 0.235, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.168-0.302, P <0.0001). The Cochrane Q test (chi-square = 55.7, P <0.0001) and I2 statistic (I2 = 87.4%, 95% CI = 77.4-93.0%) revealed significant heterogeneity.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the value of quantitative assessment of ADC for objective and reliable differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity in the study data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    贝伐单抗是治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的常用策略。生存状态是复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者的关键问题,据报道,下高斯曲线的表观扩散系数(ADC)值具有预测复发性胶质母细胞瘤预后的潜力。在本研究中,我们旨在通过对随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析,阐明接受贝伐单抗治疗的复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者ADC值的生存预测,将高于截止值的ADC值与低于截止值的ADC值进行比较,以确定哪种类型的ADC值可与显著的生存获益相关联。分析不同生存指标,包括总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。包括10项研究,共782例复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者。重点结果是OS和PFS。我们的结果表明,与高于截止值的ADC值相比,低于截止值的ADC值与OS状态的显着益处相关。对于PFS观察到类似的显著益处。荟萃分析结果表明,与高于截止值的ADC值相比,低于截止值的ADC值可能与OS和PFS的显着益处相关。然而,与复发性胶质母细胞瘤的不同阶段和不同类型有关的偏倚,剂量,贝伐单抗治疗方案不容忽视.
    Bevacizumab is a common strategy for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Survival status is a crucial issue for patients with recurrent glioblastoma, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the lower Gaussian curve have been reported to have the potential to predict prognosis in recurrent glioblastoma. In the present study, we aimed to clarify the survival prediction of ADC values in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab treatment through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, comparing ADC values higher than the cut-off values with those lower than the cut-off values to determine which type of ADC values can be associated with significant survival benefits. Different survival indicators were analyzed, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Ten studies with a total of 782 patients with recurrent glioblastoma were included. The focused outcomes were OS and PFS. Our results showed that ADC values lower than the cut-off values were associated with significant benefits for OS status compared with ADC values higher than the cut-off values. Similar significant benefits were observed for PFS. The meta-analysis results suggest that ADC values lower than the cut-off values might be associated with significant benefits for OS and PFS when compared with ADC values higher than the cut-off values. However, bias in relation to the different stages of recurrent glioblastoma and different types, doses, and regimens of bevacizumab should not be ignored.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:前列腺癌(PCa)的局部分期对于治疗计划很重要。使用定性标准的放射科医生解释是可变的,具有高特异性,但灵敏度低。定量方法可能有助于诊断囊外延伸(ECE)。
    目的:评估定量MRI标记物检测ECE的性能。
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:收集28例前列腺癌根治术组织病理学证实为PCa的4800例患者进行荟萃分析。纳入46项研究的患者进行系统评价。
    扩散加权,T2加权,1.5T或3T的动态对比增强MRI
    结果:PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,Scopus,我们搜索了Cochrane数据库,以确定有关诊断测试准确性或任何定量MRI标记与ECE相关性的研究.由两个独立的研究者提取的肿瘤接触长度(TCL)和平均表观扩散系数(ADC-平均值)的结果进行荟萃分析。但不适用于其他定量标记,包括放射组学,因为可用的研究数量较少。
    方法:计算TCL和ADC平均值的分层汇总接受者工作特征(HSROC)曲线,但汇总工作点仅为TCL计算。异质性通过荟萃回归进行调查。如果P≤0.05,则结果显着。
    结果:在TCL的10毫米阈值下,综合敏感性和特异性分别为0.76[95%置信区间(CI)0.71-0.81]和0.68[95%CI0.63-0.73],分别。在15毫米的阈值,综合敏感性和特异性分别为0.70[95%CI0.53-0.83]和0.74[95%CI0.60-0.84].TCL和ADC-平均值的HSROC曲线下面积分别为0.79和0.78。TCL异质性的重要来源包括MRI相对于活检的时机。
    结论:TCL的10mm和15mm阈值均可用于临床。从HSROC曲线的比较来看,ADC均值在更高的灵敏度下可能优于TCL。
    方法:3技术效率阶段:2.
    Local staging of prostate cancer (PCa) is important for treatment planning. Radiologist interpretation using qualitative criteria is variable with high specificity but low sensitivity. Quantitative methods may be useful in the diagnosis of extracapsular extension (ECE).
    To assess the performance of quantitative MRI markers for detecting ECE.
    Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    4800 patients from 28 studies with histopathologically confirmed PCa on radical prostatectomy were pooled for meta-analysis. Patients from 46 studies were included for systematic review.
    Diffusion-weighted, T2-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T or 3 T.
    PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies on diagnostic test accuracy or association of any quantitative MRI markers with ECE. Results extracted by two independent reviewers for tumor contact length (TCL) and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC-mean) were pooled for meta-analysis, but not for other quantitative markers including radiomics due to low number of studies available.
    Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were computed for both TCL and ADC-mean, but summary operating points were computed for TCL only. Heterogeneity was investigated by meta-regression. Results were significant if P ≤ 0.05.
    At the 10 mm threshold for TCL, summary sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.81] and 0.68 [95% CI 0.63-0.73], respectively. At the 15 mm threshold, summary sensitivity and specificity were 0.70 [95% CI 0.53-0.83] and 0.74 [95% CI 0.60-0.84] respectively. The area under the HSROC curves for TCL and ADC-mean were 0.79 and 0.78, respectively. Significant sources of heterogeneity for TCL included timing of MRI relative to biopsy.
    Both 10 mm and 15 mm thresholds for TCL may be reasonable for clinical use. From comparison of the HSROC curves, ADC-mean may be superior to TCL at higher sensitivities.
    3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    传统上,对结直肠癌肝转移的化疗和靶向治疗的反应评估是基于大小变化,根据RECIST标准。然而,治疗可能会改变组织组成,而不仅仅是肿瘤大小,因此,弥散加权磁共振成像(DWI)等功能成像技术可以更全面地评估治疗反应.本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估DWI在预测和评估结直肠癌肝转移治疗反应中的应用,并确定是否存在基线表观扩散系数(ADC)截止值可以预测有利的反应。使用MEDLINE/PubMed数据库进行文献检索,使用QUADAS-2工具评估偏倚风险.汇集应答者和非应答者之间的平均差异。共有16项研究符合纳入标准,并且发现各种扩散衍生技术和系数具有预测和评估治疗反应的潜力。然而,研究之间存在差异。最一致的反应预测因子是使用传统的单指数方法计算的较低的基线ADC值。还报告了用于计算DWI衍生参数的非单指数技术。由于异质性,对一部分研究的荟萃分析未能建立ADC的截止值,但显示响应者和非响应者之间的合并平均差为-0.12×10-3mm2/s。这项系统评价的结果表明,扩散衍生技术和系数可能有助于评估和预测结直肠肝转移的治疗反应。需要进一步的对照前瞻性研究来证实这些发现,并指导CRC肝转移患者的临床和放射学决策。
    The evaluation of response to chemotherapy and targeted therapies in colorectal liver metastases has traditionally been based on size changes, as per the RECIST criteria. However, therapy may alter tissue composition and not only tumor size, therefore, functional imaging techniques such as diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) may offer a more comprehensive assessment of treatment response. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the use of DWI in the prediction and assessment of response to treatment in colorectal liver metastases and to determine if there is a baseline apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cut-off value that can predict a favorable response. A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE/PubMed database, and risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. The mean differences between responders and non-responders were pooled. A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria, and various diffusion-derived techniques and coefficients were found to have potential for predicting and assessing treatment response. However, discrepancies were noted between studies. The most consistent predictor of response was a lower baseline ADC value calculated using traditional mono-exponential methods. Non-mono-exponential techniques for calculating DWI-derived parameters were also reported. A meta-analysis of a subset of studies failed to establish a cut-off value of ADC due to heterogeneity, but revealed a pooled mean difference of -0.12 × 10-3 mm2/s between responders and non-responders. The results of this systematic review suggest that diffusion-derived techniques and coefficients may contribute to the evaluation and prediction of treatment response in colorectal liver metastases. Further controlled prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to guide clinical and radiological decision-making in the management of patients with CRC liver metastases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:评估和比较表观扩散系数(ADC)值和基于MRI的影像组学分析对宫颈癌(CC)患者淋巴结转移(LNM)检测的诊断性能。
    方法:我们在2001年1月至2021年12月期间,在相关数据库中搜索了ADC值的研究和基于MRI的影像组学分析,以检测CC中的LNM。使用诊断准确性研究2的质量评估和研究的影像组学质量评分(RQS)对偏倚风险进行方法学质量评估。汇集的敏感性,特异性,正似然比(LR+),负似然比(LR-),诊断优势比(DOR),计算曲线下面积(AUC)。使用双样品Z检验比较了两种定量分析之间的诊断性能。
    结果:总计,22项研究包括2314例患者。在4.5-36.4%的研究中观察到不清楚的偏倚风险。8项影像组学研究显示中位数(四分位数间距)RQS为13.5(5.5-15.75)。汇集的敏感性,特异性,LR+,LR-,DOR,ADC值与影像组学分析的AUC分别为0.86vs0.84、0.85vs0.73、5.7vs3.1、0.17vs0.22、34vs14和0.91vs0.86。没有阈值效应或发表偏倚,但研究之间存在显著的异质性。在使用Z检验的两种定量分析的诊断性能中没有检测到显著差异。
    结论:ADC值在临床上更有希望,因为它们更容易获得和广泛应用,并表现出优于影像组学分析的无统计学意义的趋势。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and MRI-based radiomics analysis for lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection in patients with cervical cancer (CC).
    METHODS: We searched relevant databases for studies on ADC values and MRI-based radiomics analysis for LNM detection in CC between January 2001 and December 2021. Methodological quality assessment of risk of bias using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 and radiomics quality score (RQS) of the studies was conducted. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Diagnostic performance was compared between the two quantitative analyses using a two-sample Z-test.
    RESULTS: In total, 22 studies including 2314 patients were included. Unclear risk of bias was observed in 4.5-36.4% of the studies. The 8 radiomics studies exhibited a median (interquartile range) RQS of 13.5 (5.5-15.75). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, DOR, and AUC of the ADC values vs radiomics analysis were 0.86 vs 0.84, 0.85 vs 0.73, 5.7 vs 3.1, 0.17 vs 0.22, 34 vs 14, and 0.91 vs 0.86, respectively. There was no threshold effect or publication bias, but significant heterogeneity existed among the studies. No significant difference was detected in the diagnostic performance of the two quantitative analyses using the Z-test.
    CONCLUSIONS: ADC values are more clinically promising because they are more easily accessible and widely applied, and exhibit a non-statistically significant trend to outperform radiomics analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在基于先前的研究证实表观扩散系数(ADC)值在预测PCNSL患者预后中的作用。
    方法:对相关文章PubMed,Scopus,科学直接,科克伦,DOAJ,和Embase数据库,最后更新的搜索时间为2021年11月30日。本系统综述和荟萃分析共纳入4项研究。
    结果:所有检查治疗前ADC值与OS和PFS之间关联的研究发现,较低的ADC值与显著较短的OS和PFS相关。分析显示,ADC值低的患者比ADC值高的患者有更高的死亡风险。合并HR为0.24(95%CI:0.10-0.56;Z=3.26;p=0.001)。由于低异质性值(I2=4%;p=0.38),还使用固定效应模型对来自三项研究的5个数据进行了荟萃分析,以检查ADC值与PFS之间的关联。数据分析显示,合并的HR为0.25(95%置信区间[CI]:0.14-0.44,Z=4.18;p0.00001)。
    结论:低ADC值患者的总生存期和无进展生存期明显短于高ADC值患者,因此,在初始治疗前评估ADC值可以为临床医生提供有关PCNSL预后的有价值信息.
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to confirm the role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values in predicting the prognosis of PCNSL patients based on previous studies.
    METHODS: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted on related articles PubMed, Scopus, Sciencedirect, Cochrane, DOAJ, and Embase databases with last updated search on November 30, 2021. This systematic review and meta-analysis included a total of four studies.
    RESULTS: All studies that examined the association between pretherapeutic ADC values and OS and PFS discovered that lower ADC values were associated with significantly shorter OS and PFS. The analysis revealed that patients with low ADC values had a higher risk of death than those with high ADC values, with a pooled HR of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.10-0.56; Z = 3.26; p = 0.001). A meta-analysis of five data from three studies examining the association between ADC values and PFS was also conducted using a fixed-effects model due to the low heterogeneity values (I2 = 4%; p = 0.38). The data analysis revealed that the pooled HR was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14-0.44, Z = 4.18; p 0.00001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low ADC values had significantly shorter overall survival and progression-free survival than those with high ADC values, so ADC values assessment prior to initial therapy administration can provide clinicians with valuable information about the prognosis of PCNSL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    磁共振扩散张量成像(DTI)可以检测周围神经的微观结构变化。有研究报道正中神经表观扩散系数(ADC),水分子扩散方向的量化,对诊断腕管综合征(CTS)敏感。使用ADC搜索五个数据库以研究CTS。在随机效应荟萃分析中汇集了亲代扩散系数(以mm2/s测量)。22项研究符合标准,产生592例CTS患者和414例对照。在下尺尺关节远端水平测量正中神经ADC(CTSADC:1.11,95%CI:1.07-1.15,I2=54%;对照ADC:1.04,95%CI:1.01-1.07,I2=57%),pisiform(CTSADC:1.39,95%CI:1.37-1.42,I2=0%;对照ADC:1.27,95%CI:1.23-1.31,I2=59%),hamate(CTSADC:1.40,95%CI:1.36-1.43,I2=58%;对照ADC:1.27,95%CI:1.25-1.28,I2=47%),并且作为几个测量的组合(CTSADC:1.40,95%CI:1.37-1.47,I2=100%;对照ADC:1.39,95%CI:1.24-1.53,I2=100%)。与正常对照相比,患有CTS的个体中的正中神经ADC降低。应根据这些解剖水平建立诊断CTS的ADC截止值,并且可以通过包括使用腕部线圈的其他研究来改善。
    Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can detect microstructural changes in peripheral nerves. Studies have reported that the median nerve apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), a quantification of water molecule diffusion direction, is sensitive in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Five databases were searched for studies using ADC to investigate CTS. Apparent diffusion coefficient (measured in mm2/s) were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Twenty-two studies met criteria yielding 592 patients with CTS and 414 controls. Median nerve ADC were measured at the level of the distal radioulnar joint (CTS ADC: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.15, I2 = 54%; control ADC: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07, I2 = 57%), pisiform (CTS ADC: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.37-1.42, I2 = 0%; control ADC: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.23-1.31, I2 = 59%), hamate (CTS ADC: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.36-1.43, I2 = 58%; control ADC: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.25-1.28, I2 = 47%), and as an combination of several measurements (CTS ADC: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.37-1.47, I2 = 100%; control ADC: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.24-1.53, I2 = 100%). Median nerve ADC is decreased in individuals with CTS compared to controls at the levels of the hamate and pisiform. ADC cut-offs to diagnose CTS should be established according to these anatomic levels and can be improved through additional studies that include use of a wrist coil.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号