Radiation dose hypofractionation

辐射剂量低分割
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价同步大分割放疗联合抗PD-1抗体和SOX化疗治疗一线化疗失败后转移性胰腺癌(mPC)的疗效和安全性。
    方法:纳入经病理证实的标准一线化疗失败的mPC患者。患者接受大分割放疗方案治疗,SOX化疗,和我们机构的免疫检查点抑制剂。我们收集了患者的临床信息和结果测量。中位无进展生存期(mPFS)是研究的主要终点,其次是疾病控制率(DCR),客观反应率(ORR),中位总生存期(mOS)和安全性。探索性分析包括与益处相关的生物标志物。
    结果:在2021年2月24日至2023年8月30日之间,有25名患者被纳入研究,23例接受至少1剂研究药物的患者进行了客观疗效评估.mPFS为5.48个月,MOS为6.57个月,DCR和ORR分别为69.5%和30.4%,分别。在获得PR的七名患者中,中位缓解持续时间为7.41个月.治疗中降低的血清CA19-9水平与更好的总生存率相关。此外,治疗前炎症标志物与肿瘤反应和生存率相关。
    结论:在难治性mPC患者中使用这些联合疗法治疗后,证明了临床上有意义的抗肿瘤活性和良好的安全性。治疗中降低血清CA19-9水平和治疗前炎症标志物血小板淋巴细胞比(PLR),淋巴细胞与单核细胞比率(LMR),乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)可能是与临床获益相关的生物标志物。
    背景:https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=130211,标识符:ChiCTR2100049799,注册日期:2021-08-09。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of concurrent hypofractionated radiotherapy plus anti-PD-1 antibody and SOX chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) after failure of first-line chemotherapy.
    METHODS: Patients with pathologically confirmed mPC who failed standard first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. The patients were treated with a regimen of hypofractionated radiotherapy, SOX chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors at our institution. We collected the patients\' clinical information and outcome measurements. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was the primary endpoint of the study, followed by disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (mOS) and safety. Exploratory analyses included biomarkers related to the benefits.
    RESULTS: Between February 24, 2021, and August 30, 2023, twenty-five patients were enrolled in the study, and twenty-three patients who received at least one dose of the study agent had objective efficacy evaluation. The mPFS was 5.48 months, the mOS was 6.57 months, and the DCR and ORR were 69.5% and 30.4%, respectively. Among the seven patients who achieved a PR, the median duration of the response was 7.41 months. On-treatment decreased serum CA19-9 levels were associated with better overall survival. Besides, pretreatment inflammatory markers were associated with tumor response and survival.
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinically meaningful antitumor activity and favorable safety profiles were demonstrated after treatment with these combination therapies in patients with refractory mPC. On-treatment decreased serum CA19-9 levels and pretreatment inflammatory markers platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) might be biomarkers related to clinical benefits.
    BACKGROUND: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=130211 , identifier: ChiCTR2100049799, date of registration: 2021-08-09.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全脑放射治疗(WBRT)加同时整合增强(SIB)在乳腺癌脑转移中的作用尚未得到证实。
    在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们回顾了连续的乳腺癌患者,这些患者发生了脑转移,并接受了使用调强放疗(IMRT)-SIB方法的大分割放疗加WBRT治疗.我们分析了临床结果,治疗失败的预后因素和模式。
    共有27名患者符合分析条件。4例(14.8%)患者获得了临床完全缓解,14例(51.9%)的脑部病变部分缓解。其他9名患者未评估脑肿瘤反应。中位脑无进展生存期为8.60(95%CI[6.43-13.33])个月,中位总生存期为16.8(95%CI[13.3-27.7])个月。三名患者在现场失败,五个有场外故障,两个有场内和场外故障。
    WBRT加SIB改善了乳腺癌脑转移患者的肿瘤控制和临床预后。
    UNASSIGNED: The effect of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) plus simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in brain metastasis from breast cancers has not been demonstrated.
    UNASSIGNED: In this single-center retrospective study, we reviewed consecutive breast cancer patients who developed brain metastasis and were treated with hypofractionated radiation therapy plus WBRT using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-SIB approaches. We analyzed clinical outcomes, prognostic factors and patterns of treatment failure.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 27 patients were eligible for analysis. Four (14.8%) patients achieved clinical complete response and 14 (51.9%) had partial response of brain lesions. The other nine patients were not evaluated for brain tumor response. The median brain progression-free survival was 8.60 (95% CI [6.43-13.33]) months and the median overall survival was 16.8 (95% CI [13.3-27.7]) months. Three patients had in-field failure, five had out-field failure and two had in-field and out-field failure.
    UNASSIGNED: WBRT plus SIB led to improved tumor control and clinical outcome in breast cancer patients with brain metastasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:在接受保乳手术(BCS)的患者中,中度大分割放疗(HFRT)的有效性和安全性已在几个关键的随机试验中得到证实。然而,使用现代放射治疗技术和HFRT对瘤床和区域淋巴结照射(RNI)同时进行整合增强(SIB)的可行性需要进一步评估.
    方法:这种前瞻性,多中心,随机对照,非劣效性III期试验旨在确定在接受前期BCS治疗的乳腺癌患者中,HFRT联合SIB(HFRTsib)在5年局部控制率方面的非劣效性与常规分割放疗序贯增强(CFRTseq)相比.总共2904名参与者将被招募并以1:1的比例随机分配到HFRTsib和CFRTseq组中。所有患者将接受全胸照射,腋窝淋巴结阳性的人将接受额外的RNI,包括乳腺内照射.HFRTsib组的处方剂量为40Gy,分15次,结合48Gy的SIB在15个部分的肿瘤床。CFRTseq组将在25个馏分中获得50Gy,在5个部分中连续增加10Gy到肿瘤床。
    结论:本试验旨在评估SIB联合HFRT在BCS术后早期乳腺癌患者中的有效性和安全性。主要终点是局部控制,这项试验的结果有望为BCS后乳腺癌患者使用HFRT提供关键证据.
    背景:该试验于2019年7月18日在ClincalTrials.gov(NCT04025164)注册。
    BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and safety of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has been demonstrated in several pivotal randomized trials. However, the feasibility of applying simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the tumor bed and regional node irradiation (RNI) using modern radiotherapy techniques with HFRT needs further evaluation.
    METHODS: This prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled, non-inferiority phase III trial aims to determine the non-inferiority of HFRT combined with SIB (HFRTsib) compared with conventional fractionated radiotherapy with sequential boost (CFRTseq) in terms of five-year locoregional control rate in breast cancer patients undergoing upfront BCS. A total of 2904 participants will be recruited and randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the HFRTsib and CFRTseq groups. All patients will receive whole breast irradiation, and those with positive axillary nodes will receive additional RNI, including internal mammary irradiation. The prescribed dose for the HFRTsib group will be 40 Gy in 15 fractions, combined with a SIB of 48 Gy in 15 fractions to the tumor bed. The CFRTseq group will receive 50 Gy in 25 fractions, with a sequential boost of 10 Gy in 5 fractions to the tumor bed.
    CONCLUSIONS: This trial intends to assess the effectiveness and safety of SIB combined with HFRT in early breast cancer patients following BCS. The primary endpoint is locoregional control, and the results of this trial are expected to offer crucial evidence for utilizing HFRT in breast cancer patients after BCS.
    BACKGROUND: This trial was registered at ClincalTrials.gov (NCT04025164) on July 18, 2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:由于乳房的解剖特性,大分割全乳房照射中的剂量热点区域大大增加了急性皮肤毒性的风险。在这项研究中,我们提出了几种新颖的规划策略,这些策略集成了多个子规划目标体积(子PTV),现场二次放置,和RapidPlan模型用于右侧小分割全乳照射。 方法:选择35例采用切向调强放疗(IMRT)对PTV进行剂量为42.5Gy的全乳照射。两种PTV均计划使用原始手动多亚PTV计划(OMMP)和原始手动单PTV计划(OMSP)同时治疗。最初规划了在原始PTV上具有多个对象的手动野外二次放置多个子PTV计划(m-FSMP)和手动野外二次放置单目标计划(m-FSSP),基于V105的分布(接受105%处方剂量的体积)。此外,制定了两个基于快速计划的计划,包括基于RapidPlan的多个子PTV计划(r-FSMP)和基于RapidPlan的单PTV计划(r-FSSP)。比较了计划的剂量学参数,和V105使用多变量分析进行评估,以确定其与PTV体积和横向波束角间隔(ILBA)的关系。
结果:与其他手动计划相比,在m-FSMP中观察到PTV的最低平均V105(5.64±6.5%)。验证后,与其他两种手动计划方法相比,r-FSSP对OAR表现出更高的剂量测定质量,除同侧肺的V5(接收5Gy的同侧肺容积)外。而r-FSMP与r-FSSP相比没有显着差异(p=0.06),它达到了最低的V105值(4.3±4.5%),尽管对某些OAR的剂量略有增加。
结论:m-FSMP和r-FSMP可以显着增强均匀性指数(HI)并降低V105,从而最大程度地减少急性皮肤毒性的风险,即使某些OAR可能有轻微的剂量妥协。
    Purpose.The dose hotspot areas in hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (WBI) greatly increase the risk of acute skin toxicity because of the anatomical peculiarities of the breast. In this study, we presented several novel planning strategies that integrate multiple sub-planning target volumes (sub-PTVs), field secondary placement, and RapidPlan models for right-sided hypofractionated WBI.Methods.A total of 35 cases of WBI with a dose of 42.5 Gy for PTVs using tangential intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were selected. Both PTVs were planned for simultaneous treatment using the original manual multiple sub-PTV plan (OMMP) and the original manual single-PTV plan (OMSP). The manual field secondary placement multiple sub-PTV plan (m-FSMP) with multiple objects on the original PTV and the manual field secondary placement single-objective plan (m-FSSP) were initially planned, which were distribution-based of V105 (volume receiving 105% of the prescription dose). In addition, two RapidPlan-based plans were developed, including the RapidPlan-based multiple sub-PTVs plan (r-FSMP) and the RapidPlan-based single-PTV plan (r-FSSP). Dosimetric parameters of the plans were compared, and V105 was evaluated using multivariate analysis to determine how it was related to the volume of PTV and the interval of lateral beam angles (ILBA).Results.The lowest mean V105 (5.64 ± 6.5%) of PTV was observed in m-FSMP compared to other manual plans. Upon validation, r-FSSP demonstrated superior dosimetric quality for OAR compared to the two other manual planning methods, except for V5(the volume of ipsilateral lung receiving 5 Gy) of the ipsilateral lung. While r-FSMP showed no significant difference (p = 0.06) compared to r-FSSP, it achieved the lowest V105 value (4.3 ± 4.5%), albeit with a slight increase in the dose to some OARs. Multivariate GEE linear regression showed that V105 is significantly correlated with target volume and ILBA.Conclusions.m-FSMP and r-FSMP can substantially enhance the homogeneity index (HI) and reduce V105, thereby minimizing the risk of acute skin toxicities, even though there may be a slight dose compromise for certain OARs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项1期试验旨在确定局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(LA-NSCLC)患者大分割放疗(hypo-RT)联合同步化疗和后续巩固免疫检查点抑制剂(cICI)的最大耐受剂量(MTFD)。
    方法:分疗程低RT和低升压联合同步化疗在三个剂量水平(DL),使用逐步剂量递增方案。实施了复杂的食道保留技术,以限制食道的剂量。放疗后未出现疾病进展或G2+毒性未解决的患者接受cICI治疗。每个DL旨在治疗6名患者。MTFD定义为在放疗后12个月内接受治疗的6名患者中<=2名患者经历治疗相关的G3+毒性和<=1名患者经历G4+毒性的最高DL。
    结果:18名患者入选,每个DL有6名患者。所有患者均完成低RT和同步化疗,16例(88.9%)接受至少1次cICI输注,中位数为10次输注.在12个月的评估期内,一名DL1患者出现G3肺炎,DL3的一名患者发展为G3气管支气管炎。未达到MTFD。客观反应率(ORR)为100%。中位随访时间为20.9个月,1年总生存率和无进展生存率分别为94.4%和83.3%,分别。
    结论:利用分裂过程低RT和低升压方法,5Gy的分数剂量到60Gy的总剂量,联合同步化疗和随后的cICI,耐受性良好,并产生了有希望的ORR和生存结果。
    UNASSIGNED: This phase I trial aimed to determine the maximum tolerated fraction dose (MTFD) of hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT) combined with concurrent chemotherapy and subsequent consolidation immune checkpoint inhibitors (cICI) for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: Split-course hypo-RT and hypoboost combined with concurrent chemotherapy was administered at three dose levels (DL), using a stepwise dose-escalation protocol. The sophisticated esophagus-sparing technique was implemented to restrict the dose to the esophagus. Patients who did not experience disease progression or unresolved ≥grade 2 (G2+) toxicities after RT received cICI. Each DL aimed to treat six patients. The MTFD was defined as the highest DL at which ≤2 patients of the six who were treated experienced treatment-related G3+ toxicity and ≤1 patient experienced G4+ toxicity within 12 months post-RT.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighteen patients were enrolled, with six patients in each DL. All patients completed hypo-RT and concurrent chemotherapy, and 16 (88.9%) received at least one infusion of cICI, with a median of 10 infusions. Within the 12-month assessment period, one patient in DL1 experienced G3 pneumonitis, and one patient in DL3 developed G3 tracheobronchitis. The MTFD was not reached. The objective response rate was 100%. With a median follow-up of 20.9 months, the 1-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 94.4% and 83.3%, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Utilizing the split-course hypo-RT and hypoboost approach, a fraction dose of 5 Gy to a total dose of 60 Gy, combined with concurrent chemotherapy and subsequent cICI, was well tolerated and yielded a promising objective response rate and survival outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大分割放疗(hRT)可以诱导T细胞介导的非照射肿瘤病灶的外视效应,特别是与免疫检查点阻断(ICB)联合使用。然而,临床上,这种效果仍然很少见,ICB介导的不良事件很常见。来那度胺(lena)是一种抗血管生成和免疫调节药物,用于治疗血液恶性肿瘤。我们在实体肿瘤模型中研究了lena与hRT双重组合是否可以增强腹腔镜效果。方法:在两种同基因的双侧肿瘤模型(B16-CD133黑色素瘤和MC38结肠癌)中,原发性肿瘤用hRT治疗。Lena每天服用3周。除了肿瘤大小和生存率,抗肿瘤作用对CD8+细胞的依赖性,I型IFN信号传导,和T细胞共刺激与耗竭或阻断抗体测定。肿瘤特异性CD8+T细胞定量,通过使用MHC-I四聚体和各种抗体的多色流式细胞术对其分化和效应物状态进行表征。此外,研究了树突状细胞(DC)介导的肿瘤抗原在体外和直接离体的交叉呈递以及肿瘤相关血管内皮细胞的组成。结果:在两种肿瘤模型中,hRT/lena双重组合诱导了显著的消隐效应。未照射的继发性肿瘤的控制和存活率明显优于各自的单一疗法。远视效应强烈依赖于CD8细胞,并且与未照射肿瘤及其引流淋巴结中肿瘤特异性CD8T细胞的增加有关。此外,我们发现更多的肿瘤特异性T细胞具有干细胞样(TCF1+TIM3-PD1+)和暂时性(TCF1-TIM3+CD101-PD1+)耗竭表型,并且表达更多的效应分子,如GzmB,IFNγ,和TNFα。此外,在未照射的肿瘤中,hRT/lena治疗也增加了交叉呈递肿瘤模型抗原的DC。阻断I型IFN信号传导,这对于交叉展示至关重要,完全废除了abscopal效应。骨髓来源的DC的基因表达分析显示,lena增加了IFN应答基因和与分化相关的基因的表达,成熟(包括CD70,CD83和CD86),迁移到淋巴结,和T细胞激活。流式细胞术证实在照射的肿瘤和横隔肿瘤中CD70+CD83+CD86+DC的增加。此外,当使用抗体同时阻断这些共刺激分子时,hRT/lena诱导的远视效应减弱.与DC和肿瘤特异性CD8+T细胞的浸润增强一致,包括更多的干细胞样细胞,hRT/lena还增加了未照射肿瘤中的肿瘤相关高内皮细胞(TA-HECs)。结论:我们证明lena可以以CD8T细胞和IFN-I依赖性方式增强小鼠实体肿瘤模型中hRT诱导的远视效应,与增强的抗肿瘤CD8T细胞免疫相关,DC交叉演示,和TA-HEC号码。我们的发现可能有助于(寡)转移性患者的临床试验计划。
    Background: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (hRT) can induce a T cell-mediated abscopal effect on non-irradiated tumor lesions, especially in combination with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). However, clinically, this effect is still rare, and ICB-mediated adverse events are common. Lenalidomide (lena) is an anti-angiogenic and immunomodulatory drug used in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. We here investigated in solid tumor models whether lena can enhance the abscopal effect in double combination with hRT. Methods: In two syngeneic bilateral tumor models (B16-CD133 melanoma and MC38 colon carcinoma), the primary tumor was treated with hRT. Lena was given daily for 3 weeks. Besides tumor size and survival, the dependence of the antitumor effects on CD8+ cells, type-I IFN signaling, and T cell costimulation was determined with depleting or blocking antibodies. Tumor-specific CD8+ T cells were quantified, and their differentiation and effector status were characterized by multicolor flow cytometry using MHC-I tetramers and various antibodies. In addition, dendritic cell (DC)-mediated tumor antigen cross-presentation in vitro and directly ex vivo and the composition of tumor-associated vascular endothelial cells were investigated. Results: In both tumor models, the hRT/lena double combination induced a significant abscopal effect. Control of the non-irradiated secondary tumor and survival were considerably better than with the respective monotherapies. The abscopal effect was strongly dependent on CD8+ cells and associated with an increase in tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in the non-irradiated tumor and its draining lymph nodes. Additionally, we found more tumor-specific T cells with a stem-like (TCF1+ TIM3- PD1+) and a transitory (TCF1- TIM3+ CD101- PD1+) exhausted phenotype and more expressing effector molecules such as GzmB, IFNγ, and TNFα. Moreover, in the non-irradiated tumor, hRT/lena treatment also increased DCs cross-presenting a tumor model antigen. Blocking type-I IFN signaling, which is essential for cross-presentation, completely abrogated the abscopal effect. A gene expression analysis of bone marrow-derived DCs revealed that lena augmented the expression of IFN response genes and genes associated with differentiation, maturation (including CD70, CD83, and CD86), migration to lymph nodes, and T cell activation. Flow cytometry confirmed an increase in CD70+ CD83+ CD86+ DCs in both irradiated and abscopal tumors. Moreover, the hRT/lena-induced abscopal effect was diminished when these costimulatory molecules were blocked simultaneously using antibodies. In line with the enhanced infiltration by DCs and tumor-specific CD8+ T cells, including more stem-like cells, hRT/lena also increased tumor-associated high endothelial cells (TA-HECs) in the non-irradiated tumor. Conclusions: We demonstrate that lena can augment the hRT-induced abscopal effect in mouse solid tumor models in a CD8 T cell- and IFN-I-dependent manner, correlating with enhanced anti-tumor CD8 T cell immunity, DC cross-presentation, and TA-HEC numbers. Our findings may be helpful for the planning of clinical trials in (oligo)metastatic patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    立体定向身体放射治疗(SBRT)和使用笔形束扫描(PBS)质子治疗(PBSPT)的小分割是胸部恶性肿瘤的有吸引力的选择。结合PBSPT和SBRT的目标覆盖一致性和关键器官保护的优势,这种新的递送技术具有提高治疗比例的巨大潜力,特别是在关键器官附近的肿瘤。安全和有效地实施PBSPTSBRT/低分割治疗胸部恶性肿瘤比常规分割PBSPT更具挑战性,因为担心在较大剂量/分数时存在更大的不确定性。NRG肿瘤学和粒子治疗合作小组(PTCOG)胸部小组委员会调查了美国质子中心,以确定胸部PBSPTSBRT/低分割的实践模式。从这些模式中,我们对质子SBRT/低分割胸段治疗的未来技术发展提出建议.在其他要点中,建议强调需要体积图像引导和多个基于CT的鲁棒优化和鲁棒性工具,以进一步最小化与呼吸运动相关的不确定性的影响.迫切需要直接运动分析技术的进步来补充当前的运动管理技术。
    Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and hypofractionation using pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy (PBSPT) is an attractive option for thoracic malignancies. Combining the advantages of target coverage conformity and critical organ sparing from both PBSPT and SBRT, this new delivery technique has great potential to improve the therapeutic ratio, particularly for tumors near critical organs. Safe and effective implementation of PBSPT SBRT/hypofractionation to treat thoracic malignancies is more challenging than the conventionally fractionated PBSPT because of concerns of amplified uncertainties at the larger dose per fraction. The NRG Oncology and Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Thoracic Subcommittee surveyed proton centers in the United States to identify practice patterns of thoracic PBSPT SBRT/hypofractionation. From these patterns, we present recommendations for future technical development of proton SBRT/hypofractionation for thoracic treatment. Among other points, the recommendations highlight the need for volumetric image guidance and multiple computed tomography-based robust optimization and robustness tools to minimize further the effect of uncertainties associated with respiratory motion. Advances in direct motion analysis techniques are urgently needed to supplement current motion management techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:在本荟萃分析中,我们对接受过乳腺癌手术的患者进行了大分割和常规分割放疗的安全性和有效性进行了比较分析.
    方法:本研究涉及对发表在诸如PubMed、Embase,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience。两名调查人员进行了审查,其中包括截至2023年1月3日发表的研究。评估合格研究的质量,并使用ReviewManager软件5.4(RevMan5.4)提取数据,以计算比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。
    结果:分析包括35项研究,包括18,246名被诊断患有乳腺癌的个体的集体样本。我们没有发现常规分割(CF)放疗和大分割(HF)放疗在局部复发方面的疗效差异有统计学意义(LR;OR=0.91,95%CI:0.76-1.09,P=0.30),无病生存率(DFS;OR=1.20,95%CI:1.01-1.42,P=0.03),总生存期(OS;OR=1.08,95%CI:0.93-1.26,P=0.28)。关于安全,HF和CF方案在乳房疼痛方面没有显着差异,乳房萎缩,淋巴水肿,肺炎,肺纤维化,毛细血管扩张症,和心脏毒性。然而,HF方案可降低皮肤毒性(OR=0.43,95%CI:0.33-0.55,P<0.01),改善患者疲劳结局(OR=0.73,95%CI:0.60-0.88,P<0.01).
    结论:尽管LR没有实质性差异,DFS,操作系统,或HF和CF方案之间的许多其他副作用,HF方案可降低皮肤毒性并缓解患者疲劳。如果在临床上需要解决这两个问题,在乳腺癌术后患者中,HF方案可能是常规放疗的优越替代方案.
    OBJECTIVE: In this meta-analysis, we conducted a comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in individuals who had undergone surgery for breast cancer.
    METHODS: This study involved a systematic and independent review of relevant research articles published in reputable databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Two investigators conducted the review, which included studies published up to January 3, 2023. The quality of the eligible studies was evaluated and data were extracted using Review Manager software 5.4 (RevMan 5.4) to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
    RESULTS: The analysis comprised 35 studies and encompassed a collective sample of 18,246 individuals diagnosed with breast cancer. We did not find a statistically significant disparity in efficacy between conventional fractionated (CF) radiotherapy and hypofractionated (HF) radiotherapy regarding local recurrence (LR; OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76-1.09, P = 0.30), disease-free survival (DFS; OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42, P = 0.03), and overall survival (OS; OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.93-1.26, P = 0.28). Concerning safety, there was no significant difference between the HF and CF regimens in terms of breast pain, breast atrophy, lymphedema, pneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis, telangiectasia, and cardiotoxicity. However, the HF regimen resulted in lower skin toxicity (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.55, P < 0.01) and improved patient fatigue outcomes (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60 - 0.88, P < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Although there is no substantial difference in LR, DFS, OS, or many other side effects between the HF and CF regimens, the HF regimen reduces skin toxicity and relieves patient fatigue. If these two issues need to be addressed in clinical situations, the HF regimen may be a superior alternative to conventional radiotherapy in postoperative breast cancer patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:颈静脉孔神经鞘瘤(JFSs)很少见,生长缓慢的良性肿瘤。今天,JFS的管理选项包括观察,手术,和辐射。然而,最佳治疗策略仍存在争议。立体定向放射外科是显微外科的微创替代或辅助治疗方案。伽玛刀放射外科适用于具有中小型肿瘤和正常颅神经(CN)功能的JFS患者。大分割立体定向放射治疗(HSRT)具有潜在的放射生物学优势,与单级立体定向放射外科相比,可以更好地保存正常结构。本文的目的是回顾使用HSRT治疗的JFS患者的临床和影像学结果。
    方法:作者回顾性分析了2009年1月至2020年1月在作者中心接受HSRT的74例JFS患者。其中,53例新诊断为JFS,19例患者既往有显微外科手术史,另外2例患者因伽玛刀治疗后肿瘤复发而接受了射波刀治疗。共有73例患者具有预先存在的CN症状和体征。中位肿瘤体积为14.8cm3(范围0.5-41.2cm3),其中大多数(70.3%)≥10cm3。根据肿瘤大小规定了辐射剂量方案,更多的部分用于较大的肿瘤。规定的中位边缘剂量为18.2Gy/2分数,21.0Gy/3分数,和21.6Gy/4级分。
    结果:中位随访时间为103个月(18-158个月)。治疗后,42例(56.8%)患者肿瘤消退,27例(36.5%)患者肿瘤稳定,和5(6.8%)经历了肿瘤进展。其中,MRI显示1例患者完全缓解。由于肿瘤进展,三名患者在中位25个月接受了手术。一名患者因HSRT后发生的脑积水而接受了脑室腹膜分流术,而与肿瘤进展无关。5年无进展生存率为93.2%。46例患者先前存在的颅神经病变得到改善,14年保持稳定,14年恶化。
    结论:HSRT被证明是JFSs安全有效的主要或辅助治疗策略,尽管14例患者(18.9%)在治疗后出现了一定程度的延迟症状恶化。该治疗选择被证明提供优异的肿瘤控制和CN功能的改善。
    OBJECTIVE: Jugular foramen schwannomas (JFSs) are rarely seen, benign tumors with slow growth. Today, management options for JFSs include observation, surgery, and radiation. However, the optimal treatment strategy remains controversial. Stereotactic radiosurgery serves as a minimally invasive alternative or adjuvant therapeutic regimen of microsurgery. Gamma Knife radiosurgery is suitable for patients with JFS who have small- and medium-sized tumors and normal cranial nerve (CN) function. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) offers a potential radiobiological advantage and may result in better preservation of normal structures compared to single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery. The aim of the article was to review the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with JFS who were treated using HSRT.
    METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed 74 patients with JFS who received HSRT between January 2009 and January 2020 in the authors\' center. Among them, 53 patients were newly diagnosed with JFS, 19 patients had a previous history of microsurgical resection, and the other 2 patients underwent CyberKnife because of tumor recurrence after Gamma Knife radiosurgery. A total of 73 patients had preexisting CN symptoms and signs. The median tumor volume was 14.8 cm3 (range 0.5-41.2 cm3), and most of them (70.3%) were ≥ 10 cm3. The radiation dose regimen was prescribed depending on the tumor size, and more fractions were used in larger tumors. The median margin doses prescribed were 18.2 Gy/2 fractions, 21.0 Gy/3 fractions, and 21.6 Gy/4 fractions.
    RESULTS: The median follow-up was 103 months (range 18-158 months). After treatment, 42 (56.8%) patients had tumor regression, 27 (36.5%) patients had stable tumors, and 5 (6.8%) experienced tumor progression. Among them, MRI revealed that 1 patient had a complete response. Three patients received surgery at a median of 25 months because of tumor progression. One patient underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion for hydrocephalus that developed after HSRT independent of tumor progression. The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 93.2%. Preexisting cranial neuropathies improved in 46 patients, remained stable in 14, and worsened in 14.
    CONCLUSIONS: HSRT proved to be a safe and effective primary or adjuvant treatment strategy for JFSs, although 14 patients (18.9%) experienced some degree of delayed symptomatic deterioration posttreatment. This therapeutic option was demonstrated to provide both excellent tumor control and improvement in CN function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Objective: To compare the incidence of radiation-related toxicities between conventional and hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and to explore the risk factors of hypofractionated radiotherapy-induced toxicities. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from consecutive limited-stage SCLC patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from March 2016 to April 2022. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to radiation fractionated regimens. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 5.0) was used to evaluate the grade of radiation esophagus injuries and lung injuries. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with radiation-related toxicities in the hypofractionated radiotherapy group. Results: Among 211 enrolled patients, 108 cases underwent conventional IMRT and 103 patients received hypofractionated IMRT. The cumulative incidences of acute esophagitis grade ≥2 [38.9% (42/108) vs 35.0% (36/103), P=0.895] and grade ≥ 3 [1.9% (2/108) vs 5.8% (6/103), P=0.132] were similar between conventional and hypofractionated IMRT group. Late esophagus injuries grade ≥2 occurred in one patient in either group. No differences in the cumulative incidence of acute pneumonitis grade ≥2[12.0% (13/108) vs 5.8% (6/103), P=0.172] and late lung injuries grade ≥2[5.6% (6/108) vs 10.7% (11/103), P=0.277] were observed. There was no grade ≥3 lung injuries occurred in either group. Using multiple regression analysis, mean esophageal dose ≥13 Gy (OR=3.33, 95% CI: 1.23-9.01, P=0.018) and the overlapping volume between planning target volume (PTV) and esophageal ≥8 cm(3)(OR=3.99, 95% CI: 1.24-12.79, P=0.020) were identified as the independent risk factors associated with acute esophagitis grade ≥2 in the hypofractionated radiotherapy group. Acute pneumonitis grade ≥2 was correlated with presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, P=0.025). Late lung injuries grade ≥2 was correlated with tumor location(P=0.036). Conclusions: Hypofractionated IMRT are tolerated with manageable toxicities for limited-stage SCLC patients treated with IMRT. Mean esophageal dose and the overlapping volume between PTV and esophageal are independently predictive factors of acute esophagitis grade ≥2, and COPD and tumor location are valuable factors of lung injuries for limited-stage SCLC patients receiving hyofractionated radiotherapy. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.
    目的: 分析局限期小细胞肺癌(SCLC)接受常规分割与大分割调强放疗(IMRT)的不良反应差异,探讨大分割放疗相关不良反应风险因素。 方法: 研究为回顾性研究,选取2016年3月至2022年4月于中国医学科学院肿瘤医院接受根治性IMRT同步化疗的局限期SCLC患者,根据放疗分割模式将患者分为常规分割组与大分割组。采用不良事件通用术语标准5.0版对放射性食管损伤和肺损伤进行分级。影响因素分析采用logistic回归分析。 结果: 211例患者中,常规分割组108例,大分割组103例。常规分割组和大分割组患者中≥2级急性食管炎累积发生率分别为38.9%(42/108)和35.0%(36/103),≥3级急性食管炎累积发生率分别为1.9%(2/108)和5.8%(6/103),差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),每组各有1例患者发生≥2级晚期食管损伤。常规分割组和大分割组患者中≥2级急性肺炎累积发生率分别为12.0%(13/108)和5.8%(6/103),≥2级晚期肺损伤累积发生率分别为5.6%(6/108)和10.7%(11/103),差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组患者均无≥3级肺损伤发生。大分割组中,食管平均剂量(D(mean))≥13 Gy(OR=3.33,95% CI:1.23~9.01)、计划靶体积(PTV)与食管重叠体积≥8 cm(3)(OR=3.99,95% CI:1.24~12.79)是发生2级及以上急性食管炎的独立危险因素(均P<0.05),是否患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(OR=7.08,95% CI:1.28~39.19)与≥2级急性肺炎的发生有关(P=0.025);肿瘤部位(OR=4.31,95% CI:1.10~16.94)与发生≥2级晚期肺损伤有关(P=0.036)。 结论: 局限期SCLC接受大分割IMRT不良反应可控,食管D(mean)、PTV与食管重叠体积是≥2级急性食管炎的独立影响因素,慢性阻塞性肺疾病及肿瘤部位与放射性肺损伤的发生有关。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号