BACKGROUND: Dysphagia has been recognized by the World Health Organization as a medical disability. Improving mylohyoid muscle function plays an important role in pharyngeal dysphagia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS), and electrical stimulation (ES) for dysphagia.
METHODS: Forty healthy subjects were randomly divided into four groups: TMS+PMS, TMS, PMS, and ES. TMS stimulated the cortical representative area of the mylohyoid muscle and the PMS was directly stimulating the mylohyoid muscle, both of them at a frequency of 10 Hz for a total of 1,800 pulses. The intensity of ES was based on the subject\'s tolerance level, usually 2-5 mA. Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and motor evoked potential (MEP) of the mylohyoid muscle were used to evaluate the immediate effects of stimulation on swallowing cortex excitability of healthy subjects before and after intervention.
RESULTS: The fNIRS results revealed notable activation across multiple channels in the four groups of healthy subjects both pre- and post- the intervention. Among these channels, the activation levels were most pronounced in the TMS+PMS group, followed by the TMS, PMS, and ES groups, respectively. Regarding the MEP results, post-intervention observations indicated a reduction in bilateral latency and an increase in bilateral amplitude in the TMS+PMS group. Additionally, the left amplitude exhibited an increase in the TMS group.
CONCLUSIONS: In fNIRS, all four stimulation methods significantly activated the swallowing cortex of healthy subjects, and the activation of TMS+PMS was the most obvious, followed by TMS, PMS, and ES.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive techniques such as central intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) have shown promise in improving motor function for patients with stroke. However, the combined efficacy of rPMS and central iTBS has not been extensively studied. This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the synergistic effects of rPMS and central iTBS in patients with stroke.
METHODS: In this study, 28 stroke patients were randomly allocated to receive either 1200 pulses of real or sham rPMS on the radial nerve of the affected limb, followed by 1200 pulses of central iTBS on the ipsilesional hemisphere. The patients received the intervention for 10 sessions over two weeks. The primary outcome measures were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Secondary outcomes for activities and participation included the Functional Independence Measure-Selfcare (FIM-Selfcare) and the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). The outcome measures were assessed before and after the intervention.
RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement in FMA-UE and FIM-Selfcare after the intervention (p < 0.05). Only the rPMS + iTBS group had significant improvement in ARAT-Grasp and SIS-Strength and activity of daily living (p < 0.05). However, the change scores in all outcome measures did not differ between two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the study\'s findings suggest that rPMS may have a synergistic effect on central iTBS to improve grasp function and participation. In conclusion, these findings highlight the potential of rPMS as an adjuvant therapy for central iTBS in stroke rehabilitation. Further large-scale studies are needed to fully explore the synergistic effects of rPMS on central iTBS.
BACKGROUND: This trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov ID No.NCT04265365, retrospectively registered, on February 11, 2020.

Stroke is a central nervous system disease that causes structural lesions and functional impairments of the brain, resulting in varying types, and degrees of dysfunction. The bimodal balance-recovery model (interhemispheric competition model and vicariation model) has been proposed as the mechanism of functional recovery after a stroke. We analyzed how combinations of motor observation treatment approaches, transcranial electrical (TES) or magnetic (TMS) stimulation and peripheral electrical (PES) or magnetic (PMS) stimulation techniques can be taken as accessorial physical therapy methods on symptom reduction of stroke patients. We suggest that top-down and bottom-up stimulation techniques combined with action observation treatment synergistically might develop into valuable physical therapy strategies in neurorehabilitation after stroke. We explored how TES or TMS intervention over the contralesional hemisphere or the lesioned hemisphere combined with PES or PMS of the paretic limbs during motor observation followed by action execution have super-additive effects to potentiate the effect of conventional treatment in stroke patients. The proposed paradigm could be an innovative and adjunctive approach to potentiate the effect of conventional rehabilitation treatment, especially for those patients with severe motor deficits.

BACKGROUND: Facial paralysis (FP) is a common symptom after stroke, which influences the quality of life and prognosis of patients. Recently, peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS) shows potential effects on peripheral and central nervous system damage. However, the effect of PMS on FP after stroke is still unclear.
METHODS: In this study, we applied PMS on the facial nerve of nine stroke patients with FP. At the same time, laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) was used to explore the facial skin blood flow (SkBF) in 19 healthy subjects and nine stroke patients with FP before and after the PMS intervention. The whole face was divided into 14 regions to compare the SkBF in different sub-areas.
RESULTS: In baseline SkBF, we found that there were no significant differences in the SkBF between the left and right faces in the healthy subjects. However, there was a significant difference in the SkBF between the affected and unaffected faces in Region 7 (Chin area, p = 0.046). In the following five minutes after the PMS intervention (Pre_0-5 min), the SkBF increased in Region 5 (p = 0.014) and Region 7 (p = 0.046) and there was an increasing trend in Region 3 (p = 0.088) and Region 6 (p = 0.069). In the five to ten minutes after the intervention (Post_6-10 min), the SkBF increased in Region 5 (p = 0.009), Region 6 (p = 0.021) and Region 7 (p = 0.023) and there was an increasing trend in Region 3 (p = 0.080) and left and right whole face (p = 0.051).
CONCLUSIONS: These pilot results indicate that PMS intervention could increase facial skin blood flow in stroke patients with FP. A further randomized controlled trial can be performed to explore its possible clinical efficacy.

Background: Spasticity is common among patients with stroke. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is a painless and noninvasive therapy that is a promising approach to reducing spasticity. However, the central mechanism of this therapy remains unclear. Changes in cortical activity and decreased spasticity after rPMS intervention require further exploration. The aim of this study was to explore the electroencephalography (EEG) mu rhythm change and decrease in spasticity after rPMS intervention in patients with stroke. Materials and methods: A total of 32 patients with spasticity following stroke were recruited in this study and assigned to the rPMS group (n = 16) or sham group (n = 16). The modified Ashworth scale, modified Tardieu scale, and Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity were used to assess changes in upper limb spasticity and motor function. Before and after the rPMS intervention, EEG evaluation was performed to detect EEG mu rhythm changes in the brain. Results: After one session of rPMS intervention, spasticity was reduced in elbow flexors (p < 0.05) and wrist flexors (p < 0.05). Upper limb motor function measured according to the Fugl-Meyer assessment was improved (p < 0.05). In the rPMS group, the power of event-related desynchronization decreased in the mu rhythm band (8-12 Hz) in the contralesional hemisphere (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The results indicate that rPMS intervention reduced spasticity. Cortical activity changes may suggest this favorable change in terms of its neurological effects on the central nervous system.