Pain control

疼痛控制
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与年轻患者相比,老年人的创伤死亡率更高。衰老与多个系统的生理变化相关,并与虚弱相关。虚弱是老年创伤患者死亡的危险因素。我们旨在为老年创伤患者的管理提供循证指南,以改善其并减少徒劳的程序。
    方法:六个专家急性护理和创伤外科医师工作组根据主题和指定的PICO问题广泛审查了文献。根据GRADE方法对声明和建议进行了评估,并在2023年WSES第十届国际大会上获得了该领域专家的共识。
    结果:老年创伤患者的管理需要了解衰老生理学,集中的分诊,包括药物史,脆弱评估,营养状况,早期启动创伤治疗方案以改善预后。老年人的急性创伤疼痛必须通过多模式镇痛方法来管理,以避免使用阿片类药物的副作用。建议在穿透性(腹部,胸)创伤,严重烧伤和开放性骨折的老年患者减少脓毒症并发症。在没有败血症和脓毒性休克迹象的钝性创伤中不推荐使用抗生素。高危和中危老年创伤患者应根据肾功能情况尽早使用LMWH或UFH预防静脉血栓栓塞,患者体重和出血风险。姑息治疗小组应尽快参与,以考虑患者的指示,以多学科方法讨论生命的终结。家庭感情和代表的欲望,所有的决定都应该分享。
    结论:老年创伤患者的管理需要了解衰老生理学,基于评估虚弱和创伤早期激活方案的重点分诊,以改善结局。需要老年重症监护病房以多学科方法护理老年和虚弱的创伤患者,以降低死亡率并改善预后。
    The trauma mortality rate is higher in the elderly compared with younger patients. Ageing is associated with physiological changes in multiple systems and correlated with frailty. Frailty is a risk factor for mortality in elderly trauma patients. We aim to provide evidence-based guidelines for the management of geriatric trauma patients to improve it and reduce futile procedures.
    Six working groups of expert acute care and trauma surgeons reviewed extensively the literature according to the topic and the PICO question assigned. Statements and recommendations were assessed according to the GRADE methodology and approved by a consensus of experts in the field at the 10th international congress of the WSES in 2023.
    The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage, including drug history, frailty assessment, nutritional status, and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Acute trauma pain in the elderly has to be managed in a multimodal analgesic approach, to avoid side effects of opioid use. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in penetrating (abdominal, thoracic) trauma, in severely burned and in open fractures elderly patients to decrease septic complications. Antibiotics are not recommended in blunt trauma in the absence of signs of sepsis and septic shock. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with LMWH or UFH should be administrated as soon as possible in high and moderate-risk elderly trauma patients according to the renal function, weight of the patient and bleeding risk. A palliative care team should be involved as soon as possible to discuss the end of life in a multidisciplinary approach considering the patient\'s directives, family feelings and representatives\' desires, and all decisions should be shared.
    The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage based on assessing frailty and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Geriatric Intensive Care Units are needed to care for elderly and frail trauma patients in a multidisciplinary approach to decrease mortality and improve outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在综合比较单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)和胫骨高位截骨术(HTO)对内侧膝骨关节炎患者伤口感染和疼痛的影响。在Embase进行了计算机化搜索,PubMed,谷歌学者,中国国家知识基础设施,Cochrane图书馆和万方数据库,从数据库开始到2023年10月,用于比较UKA和HTO治疗内侧膝骨关节炎的研究。研究选择,数据提取和研究质量评价由两名研究者独立进行。采用Stata17.0软件进行数据分析。总的来说,纳入10项研究,涉及870例膝内侧骨关节炎患者。发现与HTO组相比,UKA组具有显著更低的伤口视觉模拟评分(SMD=-0.53,95CI:-0.87至-0.20,p<0.001)。UKA组伤口感染发生率高于HTO组(OR=1.92,95CI:0.65-5.69,p=0.240),并发症发生率较低(OR=0.89,95CI:0.52-1.54,p=0.684),尽管这些差异没有统计学意义。这项研究表明,UKA可有效缓解内侧膝骨关节炎的术后伤口疼痛。然而,术后伤口感染和并发症的发生率与HTO相当。临床医生在制定个性化治疗决策时应考虑患者年龄和疾病严重程度等因素。
    This study aims to comprehensively compare the effects of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) on wound infection and pain in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. A computerized search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cochrane Library and Wanfang databases, from database inception to October 2023, for studies comparing UKA and HTO for medial knee osteoarthritis. Studies selection, data extraction and study quality evaluation were independently conducted by two researchers. Stata 17.0 software was employed for data analysis. Overall, 10 studies involving 870 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were included. It was found that the UKA group had significantly lower wound visual analogue scale scores compared to the HTO group (SMD = -0.53, 95%CI: -0.87 to -0.20, p < 0.001). The incidence of wound infection in the UKA group was higher than in the HTO group (OR = 1.92, 95%CI: 0.65-5.69, p = 0.240), and the incidence of complications was lower (OR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.52-1.54, p = 0.684), though these differences were not statistically significant. This study indicates that UKA is effective in alleviating postoperative wound pain in medial knee osteoarthritis. However, the rates of postoperative wound infection and complications are comparable to those of HTO. Clinicians should consider factors such as patient age and disease severity in making individualized treatment decisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癌症相关疼痛是晚期肺癌患者临终期(EOL)的常见优先症状之一。缓解疼痛无疑是肺癌姑息治疗的重要组成部分。我们的研究旨在研究阿片类药物处方水平结局的趋势,作为中国治疗不足疼痛的潜在指标。
    方法:本研究采用2014-2017年中国城市医疗保险诊断肺癌患者1330例资料。阿片类药物处方水平的结果由服用阿片类药物处方的患者比例的年度趋势决定。死者填充的阿片类药物的总剂量,和吗啡毫克当量每天(MMED)在EOL(定义为死亡前60天)。我们进一步分析了阿片类药物处方数量的每月变化,MMED,和平均每日剂量的阿片类药物的处方(MDDP)的最后60天的生命的一年和年龄,分别。
    结果:共纳入959例患者的确切死亡日期,432例(45.06%;95%CI:44.36%-45.77%)在EOL接受至少一种阿片类药物处方。服用阿片类药物的患者比例呈下降趋势,死者和MMED填充的阿片类药物的总剂量,年下降0.341%(p=0.01),104.23毫克(p=0.011)和2.84毫克(p=0.014),分别。在31-60天到0-30天的生命中,MMED下降6.08毫克(95%CI:-7.14至-5.03;p=0.000351),阿片类药物处方数量上升0.66(95%CI:0.160-1.16;p=0.025)。像MMED一样,与前一个月相比,MDDP在死亡前最后一个月下降了4.11mg(95%CI:-5.86至-2.37;p=0.005)。
    结论:中国城市晚期肺癌人群在EOL获得阿片类药物的机会减少。临床医生没有给每个处方开出令人满意的阿片类药物剂量,而患者在生命的最后30天内疼痛加剧。在EOL期间,肺癌患者应提倡使用足够的阿片类镇痛药。
    BACKGROUND: Cancer-related pain is one of the common priority symptoms in advanced lung cancer patients at the end-of-life (EOL). Alleviating pain is undoubtedly a critical component of palliative care in lung cancer. Our study was initiated to examined trends in opioid prescription-level outcomes as potential indicators of undertreated pain in China.
    METHODS: This study used data on 1330 patients diagnosed with lung cancer of urban city medical insurance in China who died between 2014 and 2017. Opioid prescription-level outcomes were determined by annual trends of the proportion of patients filling an opioid prescription, the total dose of opioids filled by decedents, and morphine milligram equivalents per day (MMED) at the EOL (defined as the 60 days before death). We further analyzed monthly changes in the number of opioid prescriptions filled, MMED, and mean daily dose of opioids per prescription (MDDP) of the last 60 days of life by year at death and age, respectively.
    RESULTS: A total of 959 patients with exact dates of death were included, with 432 cases (45.06%; 95% CI: 44.36%-45.77%) receiving at least one opioid prescription at the EOL. The declining trends were shown in the proportion of patients filling any opioid prescription, the total dose of opioids filled by decedents and MMED, with an annual decrease of 0.341% (p = 0.01), 104.23 mg (p = 0.011) and 2.84 mg (p = 0.014), respectively. Within the 31-60 days to the 0-30 days of life, the MMED declined 6.08 mg (95% CI: -7.14 to -5.03; p = 0.000351), while the number of opioid prescriptions rose 0.66 (95% CI: 0.160-1.16; p = 0.025). Like the MMED, the MDDP fell 4.11 mg (95% CI: -5.86 to -2.37; p = 0.005) within the last month before death compared to the previous month.
    CONCLUSIONS: Terminal lung cancer populations in urban China have experienced reduced access to opioids at the EOL. The clinicians did not prescribe a satisfactory dose of opioids per prescription, while the patients suffered increasing pain in the last 30 days of life. Sufficient opioid analgesic administration should be advocated for lung cancer patients during the EOL period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:普瑞巴林可能具有减轻胸外科手术后疼痛的潜力,本荟萃分析旨在探讨普瑞巴林对胸外科手术患者疼痛强度的影响。
    方法:PubMed,EMBase,WebofScience,系统地搜索了EBSCO和Cochrane图书馆数据库,我们纳入了评估普瑞巴林对胸部手术后疼痛强度影响的随机对照试验(RCT).
    结果:5个随机对照试验最终纳入meta分析。总的来说,与胸外科手术的对照干预相比,普瑞巴林与0h时疼痛评分显著降低相关(平均差[MD]=-0.70;95%置信区间[CI]=-1.10至-0.30;P=0.0005),24h疼痛评分(MD=-0.47;95%CI=-0.75至-0.18;P=0.001)和神经性疼痛(奇数比[OR]=0.24;95%CI=0.12至0.47;P<0.0001),但对头晕发生率无明显影响(OR=1.07;95%CI=0.15~7.46;P=0.95),头痛(OR=1.00;95%CI=0.30~3.35;P=1.00)或恶心(OR=1.24;95%CI=0.46~3.35;P=0.68)。
    结论:普瑞巴林可有效缓解胸外科术后疼痛。
    BACKGROUND: Pregabalin may have some potential in alleviating pain after thoracic surgery, and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of pregabalin on pain intensity for patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
    METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of pregabalin on pain intensity after thoracic surgery.
    RESULTS: Five RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention for thoracic surgery, pregabalin was associated with significantly reduced pain scores at 0 h (mean difference [MD]=-0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]=-1.10 to -0.30; P = 0.0005), pain scores at 24 h (MD=-0.47; 95% CI=-0.75 to -0.18; P = 0.001) and neuropathic pain (odd ratio [OR] = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.47; P < 0.0001), but demonstrated no obvious impact on the incidence of dizziness (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.15 to 7.46; P = 0.95), headache (OR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.30 to 3.35; P = 1.00) or nausea (OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 0.46 to 3.35; P = 0.68).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin may be effective to alleviate the pain after thoracic surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:本研究旨在评估联合多区域麻醉(CMRA)作为一种潜在策略的可行性和安全性,以减少超声引导下微波消融(US引导-MWA)肝肿瘤期间和之后的疼痛和对静脉镇痛药的依赖。
    方法:纳入75例患者队列,共99例接受US指导的肝肿瘤MWA。这些患者被随机分为三组:A,B,和C.在消融手术之前,A组患者接受联合肝门阻滞(HHB),腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB),和局部麻醉(LA)。B组患者与LA联合给予HHB,而C组患者接受了TAPB和LA。评价参数包括数值评定量表(NRS)得分,吗啡的消费,并发症的发生率,围手术期疼痛的影响因素。
    结果:所有患者均成功接受了US指导的MWA。三组消融期间疼痛的NRS评分峰值分别为2.36±1.19、3.28±1.59和4.24±1.42(P<0.01)。需要吗啡的患者分别为4/25、8/25和13/25(P<0.01)。三组在术后4、8、12、24和36小时的NRS评分显示出最初增加,然后下降的模式。每个间隔的顺序为:A组结论:CMRA提供了一种有效且安全的方式来管理US指导的肝肿瘤MWA期间和之后的疼痛。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of combined multiple regional anesthesia (CMRA) as a potential strategy to decrease pain and reliance on intravenous analgesics during and after ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (US-guided-MWA) of liver tumors.
    METHODS: A cohort of 75 patients with a total of 99 liver tumors who underwent US-guided-MWA of liver tumors were enrolled. These patients were randomly allocated into three groups: A, B, and C. Prior to the ablation procedure, Group A patients received a combination of hepatic hilar block (HHB), Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), and local anesthesia (LA). Patients in Group B were administered HHB in conjunction with LA, while those in Group C received TAPB and LA. Evaluative parameters included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores, consumption of morphine, incidence of complications, and factors influencing perioperative pain.
    RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent US-guided-MWA. The peak NRS scores for pain during ablation across the three groups were 2.36 ± 1.19, 3.28 ± 1.59, and 4.24 ± 1.42 respectively (P < 0.01), while the count of patients requiring morphine were 4/25, 8/25, and 13/25 respectively (P < 0.01). Postoperative NRS scores for the three groups at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36-hour intervals demonstrated a pattern of initial increase followed by a decrease, with the order at each interval being: Group A < Group C < Group B. Factors associated with increased pain included larger tumor size, greater number of tumors, and longer procedure and ablation time (P < 0.05). No major complications were recorded across the three groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: CMRA offers an effective and safe modality to manage pain during and after US-guided-MWA of liver tumors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)是导致老年人残疾的主要原因,而没有治愈性治疗。基于关节内注射(IA)的疾病缓解性OA药物的开发因其在生物利用度和减少全身暴露方面的优势而引起广泛关注。根据新揭示的OA发病机制,几种实验性IA药物在临床前研究中取得了成功;此外,其中一些处于随机临床试验的不同阶段,为OA的疾病改良带来新的机遇。
    这是一篇有针对性的文献综述,旨在总结针对软骨修复的实验IA药物,细胞内稳态,细胞衰老,疼痛控制。我们还引入了靶向基因/寡核苷酸产物。
    目前可用的KOA治疗方法仍然是症状缓解和手术置换受损关节。最近新兴的实验性IA药物处于不同的开发阶段,并且可能在不久的将来进入实践,并解决许多未满足的需求。新药开发的主要挑战是对反应对象的知识有限,受试者的异质性和疾病的复杂性。尽管如此,基于IA的实验药物由于其固有的优势,仍然具有很大的潜力成为未来的疾病修饰治疗方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a leading cause of disability among older adults without a curative therapy available. The development of disease-modifying OA drugs based on intra-articular injection (IA) is drawing extensive attention for its advantages in bioavailability and reduced systemic exposure. Based on the newly revealed pathogenesis of OA, several experimental IA drugs are successful in preclinical studies; moreover, some of them are in different phases of randomized clinical trials, bringing new opportunities for disease modification of OA.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a targeted literature review to summarize experimental IA drugs targeting cartilage repair, cellular homeostasis, cellular senescence, and pain control. We also introduced targeted gene/oligonucleotide products.
    UNASSIGNED: Currently available therapeutics for KOA remain symptomatic relief and surgical replacement of damaged joints. Recently emerging experimental IA drugs are in different stages of development and are likely to enter practice in the near future and address many of the unmet needs. The major challenges for development of the new drugs are limited knowledge about the responsive subjects, heterogenicity of subjects and the complexity of the disease. Despite this, IA-based experimental drugs still hold great potential to be future disease-modifying treatments for their intrinsic advantages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:本研究的目的是比较米拉贝隆联合坦索罗辛与坦索罗辛单药治疗输尿管镜碎石术后输尿管支架相关不适的疗效。
    方法:本研究共纳入102例接受输尿管镜碎石术和硅胶输尿管支架置入术的患者。患者以1:1的比例随机分配,在支架置入期间每天一次接受坦索罗辛0.4mg,每天一次或接受米拉贝隆50mg坦索罗辛0.4mg。手术前,IPSS,QOL,并收集疼痛评分。在移除输尿管支架的当天,USSQ,收集并记录镇痛使用量。
    结果:坦索罗辛组和坦索罗辛+米拉贝隆组的中位USSQ-身体疼痛评分分别为15和16(p=0.530)。两组的镇痛药使用中位数分别为3和2(p=0.170)。USSQ-泌尿症状中位数,USSQ-一般健康,USSQ-工作性能,USSQ-性问题,两组的USSQ-额外问题分别为26和26(p=0.194),11和12(p=0.068),12和13(p=0.105),2和2(p=0.437),9和9(p=0.533),分别。国际患者使用的镇痛药比中国患者多(6vs.1,p=0.015)。
    结论:与单用坦索罗辛相比,在输尿管镜碎石术和硅胶支架置入术后,坦索罗辛+米拉贝隆对输尿管支架相关疼痛控制无额外益处.两组止痛药用量和USSQ评分比较差异无统计学意义。中国患者比国际患者要求更少的镇痛药。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of mirabegron plus tamsulosin to tamsulosin monotherapy in terms of ureteral stent-related discomfort after ureteroscopic lithotripsy.
    METHODS: A total of 102 patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy and silicone ureteral stent placement were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily or mirabegron 50 mg + tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily during the stenting period. Before the operation, the IPSS, QOL, and pain score were collected. On the day of ureteral stent removal, the USSQ, analgesic usage amount was collected and recorded.
    RESULTS: The median USSQ-body pain score in the tamsulosin group and tamsulosin + mirabegron group was 15 and 16, respectively (p = 0.530). The median analgesic usage in the two groups was 3 and 2, respectively (p = 0.170). The median USSQ-urinary symptoms, USSQ-general health, USSQ-work performance, USSQ-sexual matters, and USSQ-additional problems in the two groups were 26 and 26 (p = 0.194), 11 and 12 (p = 0.068), 12 and 13 (p = 0.105), 2 and 2 (p = 0.437), 9 and 9 (p = 0.533), respectively. The international patients used more analgesics than Chinese patients (6 vs. 1, p = 0.015).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to tamsulosin alone, tamsulosin + mirabegron showed no additional benefit on the ureteral stent-related pain control after ureteroscopic lithotripsy and silicone stent placement. There was no significant difference on the analgesic usage and USSQ scores between the two groups. Chinese patients request fewer analgesics than international patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:普瑞巴林补充可能在改善鼻中隔成形术患者的疼痛缓解方面具有一定的潜力,本荟萃分析旨在探讨补充普瑞巴林对鼻中隔成形术疼痛控制的影响。
    方法:PubMed,EMBase,WebofScience,系统地搜索了EBSCO和Cochrane图书馆数据库,我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCTs),评估了普瑞巴林对鼻中隔成形术疼痛控制的影响.
    结果:6个随机对照试验最终纳入meta分析。总的来说,与鼻中隔成形术的对照干预相比,普瑞巴林干预显示1小时疼痛评分显著降低(SMD-1.05;95%CI-1.85至-0.24;P=0.01),2小时(SMD-1.01;95%CI-1.83至-0.20;P=0.02),6h(SMD-1.00;95%CI-1.47至-0.54;P<0.0001)和12h(SMD-0.69;95%CI-1.35至-0.02;P=0.04),以及抢救镇痛药(OR0.17;95%CI0.07至0.44;P=0.0002),但对恶心呕吐无明显影响(OR0.67;95%CI0.30~1.46;P=0.31),或困倦(OR1.22;95%CI0.64至2.35;P=0.54)。
    结论:鼻中隔成形术后补充普瑞巴林有利于控制疼痛。
    BACKGROUND: Pregabalin supplementation may have some potential in improving pain relief in patients with septorhinoplasty, and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of pregabalin supplementation on pain control for septorhinoplasty.
    METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of pregabalin supplementation on pain control for septorhinoplasty.
    RESULTS: Six RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis. Overall, when compared with control intervention for septorhinoplasty, pregabalin intervention showed significantly reduced pain scores at 1 h (SMD - 1.05; 95% CI - 1.85 to - 0.24; P = 0.01), 2 h (SMD - 1.01; 95% CI - 1.83 to - 0.20; P = 0.02), 6 h (SMD - 1.00; 95% CI - 1.47 to - 0.54; P < 0.0001) and 12 h (SMD - 0.69; 95% CI - 1.35 to - 0.02; P = 0.04), as well as rescue analgesics (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.44; P = 0.0002), but had no notable influence on nausea and vomiting (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.30 to 1.46; P = 0.31), or drowsiness (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.64 to 2.35; P = 0.54).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin supplementation benefits to pain control after septorhinoplasty.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号