NaV1.4 is a voltage-gated sodium channel subtype that is predominantly expressed in skeletal muscle cells. It is essential for producing action potentials and stimulating muscle contraction, and mutations in NaV1.4 can cause various muscle disorders. The discovery of the cryo-EM structure of NaV1.4 in complex with β1 has opened new possibilities for designing drugs and toxins that target NaV1.4. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of channelopathies, the binding sites and functions of chemicals including medicine and toxins that interact with NaV1.4. These substances could be considered novel candidate compounds or tools to develop more potent and selective drugs targeting NaV1.4. Therefore, studying NaV1.4 pharmacology is both theoretically and practically meaningful.

Mexiletine, a class Ib antiarrhythmic drug, exhibits its major antiarrhythmic effect via inhibition of the fast and late Na+ currents in myocardial tissues that are dependent on the opening of Na+ channels for their excitation. Through a comprehensive examination of mexiletine\'s therapeutic benefits and potential risks, we aim to provide valuable insights that reinforce its role as a vital therapeutic option for patients with ventricular arrhythmias, long QT syndrome, and other heart rhythm disorders. This review will highlight the current understandings of the antiarrhythmic effects and rationales for recent off-label use and address the mortality and proarrhythmic effects of mexiletine utilizing published basic and clinical studies over the past five decades.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare the effects of the combined administration of two adjuvants, dopamine and phenylephrine, on the cutaneous analgesic effect and duration of mexiletine in rats.
METHODS: Nociceptive blockage was evaluated by the inhibition of response to skin pinpricks in rats via the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR). After subcutaneous injection, the analgesic activities of mexiletine in the absence and presence of either dopamine or phenylephrine were assessed. Each injection was standardized into 0.6 ml with a mixture of drugs and saline.
RESULTS: Subcutaneous injections of mexiletine successfully induced dose-dependent cutaneous analgesia in rats. The results revealed that rats injected with 1.8 μmol mexiletine exhibited 43.75% blockage (%MPE), while rats injected with 6.0 μmol mexiletine showed 100% blockage. Co-application of mexiletine (1.8 or 6.0 μmol) with dopamine (0.06, 0.60, or 6.00 μmol) elicited full sensory block (%MPE). Sensory blockage ranged from 81.25% to 95.83% in rats injected with mexiletine (1.8 μmol) and phenylephrine (0.0059 or 0.0295 μmol), and complete subcutaneous analgesia was observed in rats injected with mexiletine (1.8 μmol) and a higher concentration of phenylephrine (0.1473 μmol). Furthermore, mexiletine at 6.0 μmol completely blocked nociception when combined with any concentration of phenylephrine, while 0.1473 μmol phenylephrine alone exhibited 35.417% subcutaneous analgesia. The combined application of dopamine (0.06/0.6/6 μmol) and mexiletine (1.8/6 μmol) resulted in increased %MPE, complete block time, full recovery time, and AUCs compared to the combined application of phenylephrine (0.0059 and 0.1473 μmol) and mexiletine (1.8/6 μmol) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Dopamine is superior to phenylephrine in improving sensory blockage and enhancing the duration of nociceptive blockage by mexiletine.

Objective: To determine the electrophysiological effects and related mechanisms of late sodium current inhibitors on hearts with short QT intervals. Methods: The electrophysiological study was performed on isolated Langendorff perfused rabbit hearts. A total of 80 New Zealand White rabbits were used and 34 hearts without drug treatment were defined as control group A, these hearts were then treated with IKATP opener pinacidil, defined as pinacidil group A. Then, 27 hearts from pinacidil group A were selected to receive combined perfusion with sodium channel inhibitors or quinidine, a traditional drug used to treat short QT syndrome, including ranolazine combined group (n=9), mexiletine combined group (n=9), and quinidine combined group (n=9). Nineteen out of the remaining 46 New Zealand rabbits were selected as control group B (no drug treatments, n=19), and then treated with pinacidil, defined as pinacidil group B (n=19). The remaining 27 rabbits were treated with sodium inhibitors or quinidine alone, including ranolazine alone group (n=9), mexiletine alone group (n=9), and quinidine alone group (n=9). Electrocardiogram (ECG) physiological parameters of control group A and pinacidil group A were collected. In control group B and pinacidil group B, programmed electrical stimulation was used to induce ventricular arrhythmias and ECG was collected. ECG physiological parameters and ventricular arrhythmia status of various groups were analyzed. The concentrations of pinacidil, ranolazine, mexiletine and quinidine used in this study were 30, 10, 30 and 1 μmol/L, respectively. Results: Compared with control group A, the QT interval, 90% of the repolarization in epicardial and endocardial monophasic action potential duration (MAPD90-Epi, MAPD90-Endo) was shortened, the transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) was increased, and the effective refractor period (ERP) and post-repolarization refractoriness (PRR) were reduced in pinacidil group A (all P<0.05). Compared with the pinacidil group A, MAPD90-Epi, MAPD90-Endo, QT interval changes were reversed in quinidine combined group and mexiletine combined group (all P<0.05), but not in ranolazine combined group. All these three drugs reversed the pinacidil-induced increases of TDR and the decreases of ERP and PRR. The induced ventricular arrhythmia rate was 0 in control group B, and increased to 10/19 (χ2=13.6, P<0.05) in pinacidil group B during programmed electrical stimulation. Compared with the pinacidil group B, incidences of ventricular arrhythmia decreased to 11% (1/9), 11% (1/9) and 0 (0/9) (χ2=4.5, 4.5, 7.4, P<0.05) respectively in ranolazine group, mexiletine group and quinidine group. Conclusions: Inhibition of late sodium current does not increase but even decreases the risk of malignant arrhythmia in hearts with a shortened QT interval. The antiarrhythmic mechanism might be associated with the reversal of the increase of TDR and the decrease of refractoriness (including both ERP and PRR) of hearts with shortened QT interval.
目的： 探讨抑制晚钠电流的药物对短QT间期心脏可能的电生理作用及其机制。 方法： 采用Langendorff灌流装置制备兔离体心脏电生理研究模型。选择新西兰大耳白兔80只，首先任意选取34只，未用药时为对照A组（n=34）、给予IKATP开放剂吡那地尔后为吡那地尔A组（n=34），再从吡那地尔A组中选取27只，联用钠通道抑制剂或传统的用于治疗短QT综合征的药物奎尼丁后分为雷诺嗪联用组（n=9）、美西律联用组（n=9）、奎尼丁联用组（n=9）。在剩余的46只新西兰兔中选取19只，未用药时为对照B组（n=19），给予吡那地尔后为吡那地尔B组（n=19）。其余27只分为雷诺嗪单用组（n=9）、美西律单用组（n=9）、奎尼丁单用组（n=9）。采集对照A组、吡那地尔A组的心电生理参数，在对照B组、吡那地尔B组中采用程序电刺激诱发室性心律失常并采集心电图。采集吡那地尔联用组和单用药物组的心电生理参数，同时诱发室性心律失常并采集心电图。吡那地尔、雷诺嗪、美西律、奎尼丁药物浓度分别为30、10、30、1 μmol/L。 结果： 与对照A组相比，吡那地尔A组的QT间期、心外膜和心内膜动作电位复极化完成90%处的时程（MAPD90）缩短、跨室壁复极离散度（TDR）增大、有效不应期（ERP）和复极后不应期（PRR）降低（P<0.05）。与吡那地尔A组相比，美西律联用组、奎尼丁联用组心外膜和心内膜MAPD90和QT间期延长（P<0.05），雷诺嗪联用组则不发生改变；TDR在3个联用组均显著降低，但ERP和PRR则延长（P<0.05）。程序电刺激时对照B组室性心律失常诱发率为0，吡那地尔B组升高至10/19（χ²=13.6，P<0.05）。雷诺嗪联用组、美西律联用组和奎尼丁联用组室性心律失常的诱发率分别为1/9、1/9和0，均低于吡那地尔B组（χ²=4.5、4.5、7.4，P均<0.05）。 结论： 在QT间期缩短的心脏，抑制晚钠电流不会加重电生理异常，而且会降低恶性心律失常发生的危险性，其机制与逆转短QT情况下TDR的增大和不应期（包括ERP及PRR）的缩短有关。.

It is arduous to determine clinical solutions for Andersen-Tawil syndrome (ATS) in patients intolerant of β-blocker. Here, we present the case of a 7-year-old boy with periodic paralysis and dysmorphic features who experienced syncope four times during exercise. His ECG revealed enlarged U waves and QU-prolongation associated with ATS-specific U wave patterns, frequent PVCs, and non-sustained bidirectional or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. The genetic test showed a de novo missense R218W mutation of KCNJ2. With the diagnosis of ATS and intolerance of β-blocker, the patient was prescribed oral medications of mexiletine 450 mg/day without severe adverse effects. The repeat ECG showed decreased PVC burden from 38 to 3% and absence of ventricular tachycardia. He remained symptom-free during over 2 years of outpatient follow-up. This case demonstrates a new anti-arrhythmic therapy with mexiletine for prevention of life-threatening cardiac events in patients with ATS who are intolerant of β-blocker treatment.

暂无摘要。

β-Blockers are first-line therapy in patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS). However, β-blockers had genotype dependent efficacy (LQT1>LQT2>LQT3). Sodium channel blockers have been recommended as add-on therapy for LQT3 patients. However, the pooled effect of sodium channel blockers in all LQTS patients remains unknown.
We conducted a systematic electronic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Fixed effects model was used to assess the effect of sodium channel blockers on QTc, cardiac events (CEs), and the proportion of QTc ≥ 500 ms and QTc ≤ 460 ms in LQTS patients.
Pooled analysis of 14 studies with 213 LQTS (9 LQT1 + 63 LQT2 + 135 LQT3 + 6 others) patients showed that sodium channel blockers significantly shortened QTc by nearly 50 ms (mean difference [MD], -49.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], -57.80 to -41.05, p < .001), reduced the incidence of CEs (risk ratio [RR], 0.23; 95% CI, 0.11-0.47; p < .001) and the proportion of QTc ≥ 500 ms (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.24-0.47; p < .001), and increased the proportion of QTc ≤ 460 ms (RR, 10.33; 95% CI, 4.62-23.09; p < .001). Sodium channel blockers significantly shortened QTc both in LQT3 and LQT2 patients, while the QTc shortening effect in LQT3 was superior to that in LQT2 (57.39 vs. 36.61 ms). Mexiletine, flecainide, and ranolazine all significantly shortened QTc, and the QTc shortening effect by mexiletine was the best (60.70 vs. 49.08 vs. 50.10 ms).
Sodium channel blockers can be useful both in LQT3 and LQT2 patients. Mexiletine, flecainide and ranolazine significantly shortened QTc in LQTS patients, and the QTc shortening effect by mexiletine was the best.

As adrenaline, serotonin and norepinephrine are two other vasoconstrictors and both of which have been proved to increase the quality and duration of local anesthetics when added as adjuvants. However, the difference in the improvement of the nociception of local anesthetics between the two adjuvants remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the cutaneous nociception of mexiletine by coadministration with serotonin and norepinephrine. Subcutaneous injection of drugs or combinations includes mexiletine 0.6, 1.8, 6.0 μmol, serotonin 1.6500 μmol, noradrenaline 0.8895 nmol, saline, mexiletine 1.8 and 6.0 μmol, respectively combined with serotonin 0.4125, 0.8250, 1.6500 μmol and noradrenaline 0.0356, 0.1779, 0.8895 nmol, with each injection dose of 0.6 ml. The nociception of mexiletine alone and mexiletine coadministered with serotonin and norepinephrine was assessed after subcutaneous injection. Subcutaneous injections of mexiletine elicited dose-related cutaneous antinociception (P < 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001). Compared with mexiletine (1.8 μmol), adding norepinephrine (except for lowest dose) and serotonin to mexiletine (1.8 μmol) solutions for skin nociceptive block potentiated and prolonged the action (P < 0.01 or 0.001). Mexiletine (6.0 μmol) combined with norepinephrine and serotonin extended the duration of cutaneous antinociception when compared with mexiletine (6.0 μmol) alone (P < 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001). Both serotonin and norepinephrine improve the sensory block and enhances the nociceptive block duration of mexiletine, and serotonin is superior to that of norepinephrine.

Background : Mutations in SCN5A that decrease Na current underlie arrhythmia syndromes such as the Brugada syndrome (BrS). SCN5A in humans has two splice variants, one lacking a glutamine at position 1077 (Q1077del) and one containing Q1077. We investigated the effect of splice variant background on loss-of-function and rescue for R1512W, a mutation reported to cause BrS. Methods and results : We made the mutation in both variants and expressed them in HEK-293 cells for voltage-clamp study. After 24 hours of transfection, the current expression level of R1512W was reduced by ~50% in both Q1077del and Q1077 compared to the wild-type (WT) channel, respectively. The activation and inactivation midpoint were not different between WT and mutant channels in both splice variant backgrounds. However, slower time constants of recovery and enhanced intermediate inactivation were observed for R1512W/Q1077 compared with WT-Q1077, while the recovery and intermediate inactivation parameters of R1512W/Q1077del were similar to WT-Q1077del. Furthermore, both mexiletine and the common polymorphism H558R restored peak sodium current (I Na) amplitude of the mutant channel by increasing the cell surface expression of SCN5A. Conclusion : These findings provide further evidence that the splice variant affects the molecular phenotype with implications for the clinical phenotype, and they provide insight into the expression defect mechanisms and potential treatment in BrS.

UNASSIGNED: Long QT syndrome 3 (LQT3) is caused by SCN5A mutations. Late sodium current (late I Na) inhibitors are current-specific to treat patients with LQT3, but the mechanisms underlying mexiletine (MEX) -sensitive (N1325S and R1623Q) and -insensitive (M1652R) mutations remains to be elucidated.
UNASSIGNED: LQT3 patients with causative mutations were treated with oral MEX following i.v. lidocaine. Whole-cell patch-clamp techniques and molecular remodeling were used to determine the mechanisms underlying the sensitivity to MEX.
UNASSIGNED: Intravenous administration of lidocaine followed by MEX orally in LQT patients with N1325S and R1623Q sodium channel mutation shortened QTc interval, abolished arrhythmias, and completely normalized the ECG. In HEK293 cells, the steady-state inactivation curves of the M1652R channels were rightward shifted by 5.6 mV relative to the WT channel. In contrast, the R1623Q mutation caused a leftward shift of the steady-state inactivation curve by 15.2 mV compared with WT channel, and N1325S mutation did not affect steady-state inactivation (n = 5-13, P < 0.05). The extent of the window current was expanded in all three mutant channels compared with WT. All three mutations increased late I Na with the greatest amplitude in the M1652R channel (n = 9-15, P < 0.05). MEX caused a hyperpolarizing shift of the steady-state inactivation and delayed the recovery of all three mutant channels. Furthermore, it suppressed late I Na in N1325S and R1623Q to a greater extent compared to that of M1652R mutant channel. Mutations altered the sensitivity of Nav1.5 to MEX through allosteric mechanisms by changing the conformation of Nav1.5 to become more or less favorable for MEX binding. Late I Na inhibitors suppressed late I Na in N1325S and R1623Q to a greater extent than that in the M1652R mutation (n = 4-7, P < 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: The N1325S, R1623Q, and M1652R mutations are associated with a variable augmentation of late I Na, which was reversed by MEX. M1652R mutation changes the conformation of Nav1.5 that disrupt the inactivation of channel affecting MEX binding, corresponding to the poor response to MEX. The lidocaine test, molecular modeling, and drugs screening in cells expressing mutant channels are useful for predicting the effectiveness of late I Na inhibitors.