UNASSIGNED: Despite major advances in the clinical management of long QT syndrome, some patients are not fully protected by beta-blocker therapy. Mexiletine is a well-known sodium channel blocker, with proven efficacy in patients with sodium channel-mediated long QT syndrome type 3. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of mexiletine in long QT syndrome type 2 (LQT2) using cardiomyocytes derived from patient-specific human induced pluripotent stem cells, a transgenic LQT2 rabbit model, and patients with LQT2.
UNASSIGNED: Heart rate-corrected field potential duration, a surrogate for QTc, was measured in human induced pluripotent stem cells from 2 patients with LQT2 (KCNH2-p.A561V, KCNH2-p.R366X) before and after mexiletine using a multiwell multi-electrode array system. Action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD90) was evaluated in cardiomyocytes isolated from transgenic LQT2 rabbits (KCNH2-p.G628S) at baseline and after mexiletine application. Mexiletine was given to 96 patients with LQT2. Patients were defined as responders in the presence of a QTc shortening ≥40 ms. Antiarrhythmic efficacy of mexiletine was evaluated by a Poisson regression model.
UNASSIGNED: After acute treatment with mexiletine, human induced pluripotent stem cells from both patients with LQT2 showed a significant shortening of heart rate-corrected field potential duration compared with dimethyl sulfoxide control. In cardiomyocytes isolated from LQT2 rabbits, acute mexiletine significantly shortened APD90 (∆APD shortening 113 ms), indicating a strong mexiletine-mediated shortening across different LQT2 model systems. Mexiletine was given to 96 patients with LQT2 either chronically (n=60) or after the acute oral drug test (n=36): 65% of the patients taking mexiletine only chronically and 75% of the patients who performed the acute oral test were responders. There was a significant correlation between basal QTc and ∆QTc during the test (r= -0.8; P<0.001). The oral drug test correctly predicted long-term effect in 93% of the patients. Mexiletine reduced the mean yearly event rate from 0.10 (95% CI, 0.07-0.14) to 0.04 (95% CI, 0.02-0.08), with an incidence rate ratio of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.16-0.84), reflecting a 60% reduction in the event rate (P=0.01).
UNASSIGNED: Mexiletine significantly shortens cardiac repolarization in LQT2 human induced pluripotent stem cells, in the LQT2 rabbit model, and in the majority of patients with LQT2. Furthermore, mexiletine showed antiarrhythmic efficacy. Mexiletine should therefore be considered a valid therapeutic option to be added to conventional therapies in higher-risk patients with LQT2.

Non-dystrophic myotonias (NDM) are disabling genetic diseases that impact quality of life. To reduce the impact of NDM, patients develop coping strategies such as lifestyle adaptation and avoiding key triggers. To understand how myotonia affects patients\' lives, the IMPACT survey, an online questionnaire on patient-reported outcomes, was developed based on international IMPACT questionnaire. The French IMPACT 2022 survey was completed by 47 NDM French patients. Besides muscle stiffness (98%), patients reported muscle pain (83%), falls (70%) and anxiety (77%). These issues negatively impacted abilities to work/study (49%), daily life at home (49%) and overall mobility outside (49%). Most patients (96%) reported ongoing pharmacological treatment (mexiletine, 91%) associated with improvement in muscle stiffness (100%) and reduction in falls (94%), muscle pain (87%) and anxiety (80%). Patients were moderately satisfied (19.1%), satisfied (42.6%) and very satisfied (29.8%) with the current management; 32% rated their quality of life positively (≥ 8 on 10-point scale). In conclusion, this French survey confirms the impact of myotonia on daily life and quality of life. The improvement in patient-reported outcomes in treated participants highlights the importance of managing myotonia with effective treatments. More work should be initiated to assess the importance of NDM symptom management and patients\' adherence and compliance to treatment.

NaV1.4 is a voltage-gated sodium channel subtype that is predominantly expressed in skeletal muscle cells. It is essential for producing action potentials and stimulating muscle contraction, and mutations in NaV1.4 can cause various muscle disorders. The discovery of the cryo-EM structure of NaV1.4 in complex with β1 has opened new possibilities for designing drugs and toxins that target NaV1.4. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of channelopathies, the binding sites and functions of chemicals including medicine and toxins that interact with NaV1.4. These substances could be considered novel candidate compounds or tools to develop more potent and selective drugs targeting NaV1.4. Therefore, studying NaV1.4 pharmacology is both theoretically and practically meaningful.

In France, mexiletine - a class I antiarrhythmic drug - can be prescribed for the symptomatic treatment of myotonia of the skeletal muscles in adult patients with myotonic dystrophy under a compassionate use programme. Mexiletine is used according to its summary of product characteristics, which describes its use for myotonia treatment in adult patients with non-dystrophic myotonia, a different neuromuscular condition without cardiac involvement. A cardiac assessment is required prior to initiation and throughout treatment due to potential proarrhythmic effects. The presence of conduction system disease, the most common cardiac manifestation of myotonic dystrophy, mandates repeated cardiac evaluations in patients with this condition, and becomes even more important when they are given mexiletine. A group of experts, including three neurologists and five cardiologists from French neuromuscular reference centres, were involved in a task force to develop a treatment algorithm to guide mexiletine use in myotonic dystrophy. The recommendations are based on data from a literature review of the safety of mexiletine-treated patients with myotonic dystrophy, the compassionate use protocol for mexiletine and the personal clinical experience of the experts. The main conclusion of the expert group is that, although existing safety data in mexiletine-treated patients with myotonic dystrophy are reassuring, cardiac assessments should be reinforced in such patients compared with mexiletine-treated patients with non-dystrophic myotonia. This expert opinion to guide mexiletine treatment in patients with myotonic dystrophy should help to reduce the risk of severe adverse events and facilitate interactions between specialists involved in the routine care of patients with myotonic dystrophy.

Congenital myotonia represents a rare group of genetically inherited conditions. It can be either autosomal dominant (Thomsen) or autosomal recessive (Becker). It is characterized by muscular hypertrophy, proximal weakness, and myotonia, or impaired relaxation after contraction. These are due to mutations in the CLC1 gene. A 14-year-old male child presented with complaints of gradually progressive weakness for five years. Weakness was more pronounced in the proximal muscle groups. The weakness worsened after rest and improved with activity. This led to absenteeism and affected his school performance. Clinical examination showed generalized muscular hypertrophy with pronounced hypertrophy of the calf muscles. A neurological examination showed significant myotonia and impaired relaxation after making a fist. The diagnosis of myotonia was confirmed by electromyography, which produced a dive-bomber sound on insertion. Next-generation sequencing revealed a homozygous eight-base pair insertion in exon 19 of the CLCN1 gene. This mutation has not been reported in the existing literature for myotonia congenita. The child was started on mexiletine and improved significantly. Presently, the patient is on regular medications and doing well on follow-up. Though rare, congenital myotonia is an important cause of neuromuscular weakness. It can be easily diagnosed with a thorough clinical examination and routine testing for myotonia in all children with weakness. The treatment is relatively simple and can give the patient significant relief. Myotonia can be easily diagnosed clinically, and pharmacotherapy and proper monitoring can remarkably improve patients\' quality of life.

BACKGROUND: The rare nature of dystrophic and non-dystrophic myotonia has limited the available evidence on the efficacy of mexiletine as a potential treatment. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of mexiletine for both dystrophic and non-dystrophic myotonic patients.
METHODS: The search was conducted on various electronic databases up to March 2023, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing mexiletine versus placebo in myotonic patients. A risk of bias assessment was carried out, and relevant data was extracted manually into an online sheet. RevMan software (version 5.4) was employed for analysis.
RESULTS: A total of five studies, comprising 186 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Our findings showed that mexiletine was significantly more effective than placebo in improving stiffness score (SMD =  - 1.19, 95% CI [- 1.53, - 0.85]), as well as in reducing hand grip myotonia (MD =  - 1.36 s, 95% CI [- 1.83, - 0.89]). Mexiletine also significantly improved SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Score in patients with non-dystrophic myotonia only. Regarding safety, mexiletine did not significantly alter ECG parameters but was associated with greater gastrointestinal symptoms (GIT) compared to placebo (RR 3.7, 95% CI [1.79, 7.64]). Other adverse events showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: The results support that mexiletine is effective and safe in myotonic patients; however, it is associated with a higher risk of GIT symptoms. Due to the scarcity of published RCTs and the prevalence of GIT symptoms, we recommend further well-designed RCTs testing various drug combinations to reduce GIT symptoms.

Despite impressive developments in the field of ventricular arrhythmias, there is still a relevant number of patients with ventricular arrhythmias who require antiarrhythmic drug therapy and may, e.g., in otherwise drug and/or ablation refractory situations, benefit from agents known for decades, such as mexiletine. Through its capability of blocking fast sodium channels in cardiomyocytes, it has played a minor to moderate antiarrhythmic role throughout the recent decades. Nevertheless, certain patients with structural heart disease suffering from drug-refractory, i.e., mainly amiodarone refractory ventricular arrhythmias, as well as those with selected forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) may nowadays still benefit from mexiletine. Here, we outline mexiletine\'s cellular and clinical electrophysiological properties. In addition, the application of mexiletine may be accompanied by various potential side effects, e.g., nausea and tremor, and is limited by several drug-drug interactions. Thus, we shed light on the current therapeutic role of mexiletine for therapy of ventricular arrhythmias and discuss clinically relevant aspects of its indications based on current evidence.

UNASSIGNED: Myotonic disorders, such as non-dystrophic myotonias (NDMs) and myotonic dystrophies (DMs) are characterized by a delay in muscle relaxation after a contraction stimulus. There is general consensus that protocols to treat myotonia need to be implemented.
UNASSIGNED: Mexiletine is the only pharmacological agent approved for the symptomatic treatment of myotonia in adult patients with NDM and is considered to be the first-line treatment for DMs; however, its production in Italy was halted in 2022 making its availability to patients problematic.
UNASSIGNED: A panel of 8 Italian neurologists took part in a two-round Delphi panel between June and October 2022, analyzing the current use of mexiletine in Italian clinical practice.
UNASSIGNED: The panelists assist 1126 patients (69% DM type1, 18% NDM and 13% DM type2). Adult NDM patients receive, on average, 400-600 mg of mexiletine hydrochloride (HCl) while adult DM patients receive 100-600 mg, per day in the long-term. The severity of symptoms is considered the main reason to start mexiletine treatment for both NDM and DM patients. Mexiletine is reckoned to have a clinical impact for both NDM and DM patients, but currently drug access is problematic.
UNASSIGNED: Mexiletine treatment is recognized to have a role in the reduction of the symptomatic burden for NDM and DM patients. Patient management could be improved by facilitating access to therapy and developing new drug formulations.

BACKGROUND: In this study, the molecular structure of the mexiletine molecule was investigated. Since the Mexiletine molecule is a drug active ingredient, its molecular structure and spectroscopic properties are important. The effects of intramolecular hydrogen bonding on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Parameters (NMR), Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) parameters and molecular docking studies were examined in the mexiletine molecule. The effects of intramolecular hydrogen bonding on EPR parameters and molecular docking studies are the most important steps for this study.
METHODS: Conformational space scanning required for molecular structure calculations was carried out with the Molecular Mechanic Force Field method. DFT method with 6-311 +  + G(d,p) basis set level was used to obtain the most stable structure among the conformations. NMR parameters (1H and 13C chemical shift values) were also performed using the same basis set as the DFT method. The radicals created to calculate the Electron Paramagnetic Resonance parameters were modeled using the DFT/B3LYP/6-311 +  + G(d,p) method basis set level. Molecular Docking studies were carried out with the Autodock vina program.

BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac arrhythmogenic disease that predisposes patients to sudden cardiac death. It is associated with mutations in SCN5A, which encodes the cardiac sodium channel alpha subunit (NaV1.5). BrS-related mutations have incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity within families.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the role of patient-specific genetic background on the cellular and clinical phenotype among carriers of NaV1.5_p.V1525M.
METHODS: We studied sodium currents from patient-specific human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) and heterologously transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) tsA201 cells using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. We determined gene and protein expression by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, RNA sequencing, and western blot and performed a genetic panel for arrhythmogenic diseases.
RESULTS: Our results showed a large reduction in INa density in hiPSC-CM derived from 2 V1525M single nucleotide variant (SNV) carriers compared with hiPSC-CM derived from a noncarrier, suggesting a dominant-negative effect of the NaV1.5_p.V1525M channel. INa was not affected in hiPSC-CMs derived from a V1525M SNV carrier who also carries the NaV1.5_p.H558R polymorphism. Heterozygous expression of V1525M in HEK-293T cells produced a loss of INa function, not observed when this variant was expressed together with H558R. In addition, the antiarrhythmic drug mexiletine rescued INa function in hiPSC-CM. SCN5A expression was increased in the V1525M carrier who also expresses NaV1.5_p.H558R.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results in patient-specific hiPSC-CM point to a dominant-negative effect of NaV1.5_p.V1525M, which can be reverted by the presence of NaV1.5_p.H558R. Overall, our data points to a role of patient-specific genetic background as a determinant for incomplete penetrance in BrS.