UNASSIGNED: To improve the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of bladder large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).
UNASSIGNED: A clinical case of bladder LCNEC admitted to our hospital was reported. The epidemiology, prognosis, diagnosis and treatment methods of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma were reviewed. The diagnosis and treatment status and prognosis were discussed based on the literature.
UNASSIGNED: The female patient was admitted to hospital for \"more than 4 years after TURBT and intermittent hematuria for more than 2 years\". She was diagnosed as recurrent bladder cancer and underwent \"radical cystotomy + hysterectomy\". The postoperative pathological findings were high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder neck and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder. The patient recovered well after surgery, but refused radiotherapy and chemotherapy and is still under close follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: Bladder LCNEC is clinically rare, has unique pathological features, is more aggressive than traditional urothelial carcinoma, and has a poor prognosis. Surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be combined with multi-mode treatment.

暂无摘要。

Primary bladder large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare, aggressive neoplasm with high recurrence rates and poor prognosis. Traditional management has heavily relied on radical cystectomy, which, despite its aggressiveness, often results in unsatisfactory outcomes. Emerging evidence suggests the potential for less invasive, bladder-sparing approaches, yet detailed reports and long-term outcomes remain scarce. We report a groundbreaking case of a 59-year-old male diagnosed with primary bladder LCNEC, managed through a pioneering bladder-sparing multimodal treatment. This novel strategy included transurethral resection followed by a tailored chemoradiation protocol, resulting in exceptional disease control and preservation of bladder function over a 20-month follow-up period, without evidence of recurrence. This case underscores the viability of bladder conservation strategies as a legitimate alternative to radical cystectomy for managing LCNEC, presenting a beacon of hope for patients wishing to preserve bladder functionality. It prompts a reevaluation of traditional treatment paradigms and advocates for further research into multimodal, organ-sparing approaches for this challenging malignancy.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) represents an exceptionally aggressive and infrequent variant within the realm of non-small cell lung cancer, necessitating surgical intervention as the primary therapeutic approach. However, the postoperative management strategy for early-stage patients continues to be a subject of intense debate and uncertainty.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of patients diagnosed with LCNEC who underwent surgical resection at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between July 2018 and June 2022. Comprehensive assessments, encompassing univariate and multivariate analyses, were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of these indicators in patient clinical profiles, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS).
RESULTS: A comprehensive screening effort identified 171 patients with LCNEC, with 70 stage I patients meeting the criteria for inclusion in the final cohort. Of these, 11 patients (15.7%) presented with combined LCNEC, and 59 (84.3%) exhibited pure LCNEC. Univariate and multivariate analyses both unveiled that spread through air spaces (STAS) status emerged as an independent prognostic determinant for both DFS (P = .003) and OS (P = .013), whereas histologic subtype independently predicted OS (P = .011). Subgroup survival analyses further underscored that the advantageous effects of postoperative chemotherapy were significantly pronounced exclusively among STAS-positive patients, showcasing a statistically significant enhancement in DFS (P = .047) and OS (P = .018).
CONCLUSIONS: STAS may serve as an adverse prognostic factor in stage I LCNEC patients, potentially offering guidance for postoperative chemotherapy decisions.

BACKGROUND: Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (C-LCNEC) has a poor prognosis and there is no consensus about the treatment regimen for both LCNEC and C-LCNEC patients.
METHODS: The patient was a 47-year-old female who received surgical resection. The postoperative histology and staging of the tumor suggested C-LCNEC with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma and T2aN0M0 stage IB. Next-generation sequencing test showed KIF5B/RET fusion mutation without EGFR, ALK, RB1, and TP53 alterations. Adjuvant chemotherapy with 4-cycle docetaxel plus carboplatin was given and brain metastasis occurred after 10 months.
CONCLUSIONS: C-LCNEC with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma is rare and highly aggressive cancer. Surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with SCLC regimen may improve the disease-free survival and overall survival. The accumulation of similar cases will clarify the profile and management of the disease.

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of malignant pulmonary tumor. The incidence rate of LCNEC was reported to be 0.3%-3% in lung cancers. Although LCNEC is classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is more aggressive and malignant than other NSCLC, and its biological behavior is similar to that of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Most of the LCNEC patients are elderly smoking male and the clinical manifestations are not specific. The imaging manifestations of the tumors are often located in the periphery and the upper lobes, and the enlargement of mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes is common. The diagnosis is mainly based on pathology by the histological features and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Specific neuroendocrine markers such as chromogranin A (CgA), synaptophysin (Syn) and CD56 are usually diffusely positive in LCNEC, and found that insulinoma-associated protein (INSM1) and high rate of Ki-67 are helpful for diagnosis. More differential diagnoses also increase the difficulty of correctly diagnosing LCNEC. The rise of LCNEC molecular typing in recent years may be helpful for diagnosis and subsequent treatment. This review focuses on the epidemiological features, imaging studies, pathology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of LCNEC.

Lung large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare tumor with poor prognosis. Despite the increasing prevalence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across a broad spectrum of solid tumors, very limited information is available about the efficacy in LCNEC. Here, we report a case of advanced lung LCNEC treated with combined radiotherapy and ICIs, which resulted in a durable response. We also focused on the impressive reaction of metastatic and primary lesions to two different combination modes of radiotherapy and ICIs.

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) are neuroendocrine neoplasms. However, the underlying mechanisms of common and distinct genetic characteristics between LCNEC and SCLC are currently unclear. Herein, protein expression profiles and possible interactions with miRNAs were provided by integrated bioinformatics analysis, in order to explore core genes associated with tumorigenesis and prognosis in SCLC and LCNEC.
GSE1037 gene expression profiles were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in LCNEC and SCLC, as compared with normal lung tissues, were selected using the GEO2R online analyzer and Venn diagram software. Gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed using Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery. The biological pathway analysis was performed using the FunRich database. Subsequently, a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of DEGs was generated using Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes and displayed via Cytoscape software. The PPI network was analyzed by the Molecular Complex Detection app from Cytoscape, and 16 upregulated hub genes were selected. The Oncomine database was used to detect expression patterns of hub genes for validation. Furthermore, the biological pathways of these 16 hub genes were re-analyzed, and potential interactions between these genes and miRNAs were explored via FunRich.
A total of 384 DEGs were identified. A Venn diagram determined 88 common DEGs. The PPI network was constructed with 48 nodes and 221 protein pairs. Among them, 16 hub genes were extracted, 14 of which were upregulated in SCLC samples, as compared with normal lung specimens, and 10 were correlated with the cell cycle pathway. Furthermore, 57 target miRNAs for 8 hub genes were identified, among which 31 miRNAs were correlated with the progression of carcinoma, drug-resistance, radio-sensitivity, or autophagy in lung cancer.
This study provided effective biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets for diagnosis and prognosis of SCLC and LCNEC.