Internet-based

基于互联网
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:关于家庭护理的有限证据和长期个性化随访的需求强调了开发基于互联网的随访平台以支持闭塞性细支气管炎(BO)患儿的看护人的重要性。本研究旨在通过比较家庭管理来探索和测试该平台的潜在收益,药物依从性和临床系统。
    方法:双臂,本研究于2022年1月至2022年10月对168名BO儿童及其家庭进行了单盲随机对照试验.家庭随机分为网络随访组和常规随访组,比例为1:1。家庭管理措施(FaMM)的分数,在三个时间点收集两组的8项Morisky药物依从性(8-MMAS)和BO临床症状:出院当天(T1),出院后3个月(T2),出院后6个月(T3)。通过重复测量方差分析比较各组因干预引起的变化。
    结果:90个家庭完成了试验,其中互联网随访组48人,常规随访组42人。结果显示,不同时间的群体互动对儿童日常生活得分有显著差异,病情管理能力与父母相互关系(p<0.05)。在“状况影响”和“家庭生活困难”的评分上没有发现按时间分组的影响。BO临床症状和MMAS-8评分显示组内,组间,和按时间分组的效果。
    结论:基于互联网的随访平台可以授权护理人员加强有效的家庭管理,改善BO儿童的用药依从性,缓解患者的临床症状。
    背景:ChiCTR2200065121(2022年4月28日)中国临床试验注册中心。
    OBJECTIVE: Limited evidence on home care and need for long-term individualized follow-up highlight the importance of developing an Internet-based follow-up platform to support caregivers of children with Bronchiolitis Obliterans (BO). This Study aims to explore and test the potential benefits of this platform by comparing family management, medication compliance and clinical systems.
    METHODS: A two-arm, single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 168 children with BO and their families from January 2022 to October 2022. Families were randomly divided into Internet-based follow-up group and conventional follow-up group with a ratio of 1:1. Scores of family management measures (FaMM), 8-item of Morisky Medication Adherence (8-MMAS) and BO clinical symptoms of both groups were collected at three points of time: the day of discharge (T1), 3 months after discharge (T2), and 6 months after discharge (T3). The changes of each group due to intervention were compared by repeated-measures ANOVA.
    RESULTS: 90 families completed the trial, including 48 in the Internet-based follow-up group and 42 in the conventional follow-up group. The results showed a significant difference in the group-by-time interaction on the scores of Child\'s Daily Life, Condition Management Ability and Parental Mutuality (p < 0.05). No group-by-time effect was found on the scores of View of Condition Impact and Family Life Difficulty. Scores of BO clinical symptoms and MMAS-8 showed intra-group, inter-group, and group-by-time effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Internet-based follow-up platform can empower caregivers in enhancing effective family management, improving medication compliance in children with BO, and relieving patients\' clinical symptoms.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry of ChiCTR2200065121 (04/28/2022).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有情感障碍的青少年的非自杀自我伤害(NSSI)行为可以直接恶化父母的内部经验,消极的父母经历会加剧甚至恶化NSSI行为。这项研究调查了患有情感障碍的青少年表现出的NSSI行为对父母内部经验的影响。具体来说,我们的研究重点是父母在COVID-19社会隔离期间,其子女参与NSSI行为时的内心体验,为解决与NSSI相关的父母心理健康问题提供见解,并开发积极的父母行为模型以优化重大公共卫生事件期间的青少年行为。
    对21名患有情感障碍的青少年父母进行了半结构化访谈,这些父母在COVID-19大流行期间表现出NSSI行为。Colaizzi7步分析用于对新兴主题进行细化和分类。
    我们的研究表明,在COVID-19大流行期间面临NSSI的青少年的父母经历了不同的内部经历,可以分为四个主题:负面体验,护理负担很高,缺乏照顾能力,和韧性。
    这项基于互联网的研究首次探索了在COVID-19大流行期间患有NSSI的情感障碍青少年父母的内部经历。它揭示了父母是如何,为了回应他们孩子的NSSI行为,经历负面经历后的韧性,探索更加开放和支持性的家庭模式。尽管取得了这些积极成果,父母表示需要增加有关NSSI疾病护理的知识,并希望获得专业帮助。
    UNASSIGNED: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) behaviors of adolescents with affective disorders can directly deteriorate parents\' internal experiences, and negative parental experiences can exacerbate or even worsen NSSI behaviors. This study investigates the impact of NSSI behaviors exhibited by adolescents with affective disorders on the internal experiences of parents. Specifically, our research focuses on the inner experiences of parents when their children engage in NSSI behaviors during social isolation of the COVID-19, offering insights for addressing parental mental health issues related to NSSI and developing positive parental behavioral models to optimize adolescent behavior during major public health events.
    UNASSIGNED: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 parents of adolescents with affective disorders displaying NSSI behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Colaizzi 7-step analysis was employed to refine and categorize emerging themes.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study revealed that parents of adolescents facing NSSI during the COVID-19 pandemic underwent different internal experiences, which could be classified into four themes: negative experience, high caregiving burden, lack of caregiving capacity, and resilience.
    UNASSIGNED: This Internet-based research is the first to explore the internal experiences of parents of adolescents with affective disorders experiencing NSSI during the COVID-19 pandemic. It sheds light on how parents, in response to their children\'s NSSI behaviors, undergo resilience following negative experiences, explore more open and supportive family model. Despite these positive outcomes, parents express a need for increased knowledge about NSSI illness care and a desire for professional assistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项荟萃分析旨在评估基于互联网的自助干预措施对青少年和大学生心理健康的影响。
    我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价,该试验调查了基于互联网的自助干预措施,旨在减轻焦虑和抑郁等心理健康症状,以及管理高水平的压力,在青少年和大学生中。我们的搜索跨越了包括WebofScience在内的数据库,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,和Embase,直到11月1日,2022年。必须强调的是,我们的重点是对症状的评估(持续的结果),而不是特定精神障碍的诊断。使用R版本4.3.1进行荟萃分析。效应大小测量为标准化平均差(SMD),和随机效应模型用于汇集来自符合条件的随机对照试验的数据。进行了亚组分析,以检查基于样本类型等因素的干预效果的变化,干预方式,导向型,和干预持续时间。
    荟萃分析基于25个比较,涉及4480名参与者。与对照组(n=2125)相比,接受干预的参与者(n=2355)报告焦虑症状显著减轻,抑郁症,和压力,以及生活质量的显著提高。具体来说,对于抑郁症,我们观察到中度干预效果(SMD=-0.42,95%CI:-0.56,-0.27),在生活质量方面也观察到了类似的模式(SMD=0.36,95CI:0.22,0.49)。对焦虑(SMD=-0.35,95%CI[-0.48,-0.22])和应激(SMD=-0.35,95%CI[-0.51,-0.20])的干预效果较小。鉴于显著的异质性,对焦虑和抑郁进行亚组分析,考虑样品类型等因素,干预方法,和干预持续时间。值得注意的是,与青少年相比,大学生在缓解焦虑和抑郁方面的获益更大。长期干预(>8周)在减少焦虑和抑郁方面特别有效。此外,第三波认知行为疗法(CBT)在两种结局指标中均显示出明显的干预效果,而指导的存在并没有显著影响结果.
    这项荟萃分析强调了基于互联网的自助计划在缓解青少年和大学生心理障碍症状方面的积极影响。然而,必须承认现有证据显示不一致和局限性。因此,使用严格方法的进一步研究对于验证和扩大本荟萃分析的发现是必要的.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of Internet-based self-help interventions on the mental health of adolescents and college students.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated Internet-based self-help interventions aiming to mitigate mental health symptoms such as anxiety and depression, as well as managing high levels of stress, among adolescents and college students. Our search spanned databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, up until November 1st, 2022. It is essential to emphasize that our focus was the evaluation of symptoms (continuous outcomes), rather than the diagnosis of specific mental disorders. The meta-analysis was performed using the R version 4.3.1. The effect size measure was the standardized mean difference (SMD), and random-effects models were used to pool data from eligible RCTs. Subgroup analyses were carried out to examine variations in intervention effects based on factors such as sample type, intervention modality, guidance type, and intervention duration.
    UNASSIGNED: The meta-analysis was based on 25 comparisons involving a total of 4480 participants. In comparison to the control group (n = 2125), participants receiving interventions (n = 2355) reported significant reductions in symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress, along with a significant improvement in quality of life. Specifically, for depression, we observed moderate intervention effects (SMD = -0.42, 95 % CI: -0.56, -0.27), and a similar pattern was seen for quality of life (SMD = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.22, 0.49). Small intervention effects were found for anxiety (SMD = -0.35, 95 % CI [-0.48, -0.22]) and stress (SMD = -0.35, 95 % CI [-0.51, -0.20]). Given significant heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were conducted for anxiety and depression, considering factors such as sample type, intervention method, and intervention duration. Notably, college students experienced more significant benefits in both anxiety and depression alleviation compared to adolescents. Longer interventions (>8 weeks) were particularly effective in reducing anxiety and depression. Additionally, third-wave cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) showed pronounced intervention effects in both outcome measures, while the presence of guidance did not notably influence results.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis underscores the positive impact of Internet-based self-help programs in alleviating the symptoms of psychological disorders among adolescents and college students. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the available evidence exhibits inconsistencies and limitations. Therefore, further research utilizing rigorous methodologies is necessary to verify and broaden the findings of this meta-analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    认知行为疗法(CBT)被广泛认为是强迫症(OCD)的有效治疗方法。然而,很少有患者能够接受CBT。基于互联网的CBT(ICBT)可能能够克服这个问题。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较CBT的疗效,治疗师指导的ICBT(TG-ICBT),无指导的ICBT(UG-ICBT),和无治疗师指导的ICBT(NTG-ICBT)通过网络荟萃分析。主要结果是强迫症严重程度的平均变化,采用耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)或儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(CY-BOCS)。次要结果包括抑郁症状的严重程度,副作用,和成本效益。共纳入25项试验,1642名参与者。我们发现CBT的疗效优于TG-ICBT。CBT组Y-BOCS/CY-BOCS评分平均改善高于UG-ICBT组,但这种差异没有统计学意义。TG-ICBT和UG-ICBT之间的疗效没有显着差异。CBT,TG-ICBT,UG-ICBT比心理安慰剂更有效,等候名单,和安慰剂。就功效而言,CBT联合药物治疗优于CBT,TG-ICBT,UG-ICBT。敏感性分析支持这些发现。根据目前的证据,当CBT不可用时,我们推荐TG-ICBT。然而,不可否认,UG-ICBT也有可能成为CBT的有效替代品。需要更多的证据来支持这种可能性。
    Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is widely recognized as an effective treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, few patients are able to receive CBT. Internet-based CBT (ICBT) may be able to overcome this problem. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of CBT, therapist-guided ICBT (TG-ICBT), unguided ICBT (UG-ICBT), and none therapist-guided ICBT (NTG-ICBT) by a network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the mean change in OCD severity measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) or the Children\'s Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS). The secondary outcomes included the severity of depressive symptoms, side effects, and cost-effectiveness. A total of 25 trials with 1642 participants were included. We found that the efficacy of CBT was superior to that of TG-ICBT. The mean improvement in Y-BOCS/CY-BOCS scores was higher in CBT group than in UG-ICBT group, but this difference was not statistically significant. The efficacy did not differ significantly between TG-ICBT and UG-ICBT. CBT, TG-ICBT, and UG-ICBT were all more effective than the psychological placebo, waiting list, and pill placebo. In terms of efficacy, CBT combined with drug therapy was better than CBT, TG-ICBT, and UG-ICBT. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings. Based on the current evidence, we recommend TG-ICBT when CBT is not available. However, it is undeniable that UG-ICBT also has the potential to be an effective alternative to CBT. More evidence is needed to support this possibility.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:探讨基于网络的自我管理干预对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者肺功能的影响。
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:八个电子数据库,包括PubMed,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,Embase,CINAHL,中国国家知识基础设施,从数据库开始到2022年1月10日,对王方和维普数据库进行了系统搜索。
    方法:使用ReviewManager5.4进行统计分析,结果报告为平均差(MD)或标准平均差(SMD),95%置信区间(CI)。结果是1秒内用力呼气量(FEV1),强制卷容量(FVC)和FEV1/FVC百分比。使用Cochrane偏差风险工具评估纳入研究的偏差风险。研究方案未注册。
    结果:包括476名参与者在内的8项随机对照试验(RCT)符合纳入标准,并纳入荟萃分析。研究发现,基于互联网的自我管理干预措施在FVC(L)、而FEV1(%),FEV1(L),FEV1/FVC(%)和FVC(%)没有显著改良。
    结论:基于互联网的自我管理干预措施可有效改善COPD患者的肺功能,在解释结果时应谨慎行事。未来需要更高质量的随机对照试验来进一步证明干预的有效性。
    结论:它为基于互联网的自我管理干预措施改善COPD患者的肺功能提供了证据。
    结论:结果表明,基于网络的自我管理干预措施可以改善COPD患者的肺功能。这项研究为难以寻求面对面自我管理干预措施的COPD患者提供了一种有希望的替代方法。和干预可以应用于临床设置。
    没有患者或公共捐款。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of internet-based self-management interventions on pulmonary function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
    METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: Eight electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Embase, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang and Weipu databases were systematically searched from inception of the database to January 10, 2022.
    METHODS: Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 and results were reported as mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Outcomes were the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced volume capacity (FVC) and percent of FEV1/FVC. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the risk of bias of included studies. The study protocol was not registered.
    RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 476 participants met the inclusion criteria and were included in meta-analysis. It was found that internet-based self-management interventions showed a significant improvement in FVC(L), while FEV1 (%), FEV1 (L), FEV1/FVC (%) and FVC (%) did not significantly improve.
    CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based self-management interventions were effective in improving pulmonary function in patients with COPD, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results. RCTs of higher quality are needed in the future to further demonstrate the effectiveness of the intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: It provides evidence for internet-based self-management interventions in improving pulmonary function in patients with COPD.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that internet-based self-management interventions could improve the pulmonary function in people with COPD. This study provides a promising alternative method for patients with COPD who have difficulty seeking face-to-face self-management interventions, and the intervention can be applied in clinical settings.
    UNASSIGNED: No Patient or Public Contribution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球,大约18.2%的宫颈癌发生在中国,主要是因为筛查覆盖率较低,筛查质量存在地区差异。评估人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测的自我取样,结合互联网,作为低资源环境中的原发性宫颈癌筛查(CCS)方法,建立基于互联网的自采样CCS管理模型。
    参加的妇女在CCS网站上注册。我们招募了20136名女性,30-59岁,来自中国13个省,作为主要的CCS,进行HPV检测的阴道自我取样,基于互联网。随后使用问卷来调查自我抽样的可接受性。
    在20,103名拥有合格样本的女性中,35.80%生活在偏远地区,37.69%从未经历过CCS,59.96%的人被筛查不足,高危型HPV的总体患病率为13.86%.在8136名受访者中,95.97%的女性认为自我抽样很容易进行,84.61%的人在使用自采样毛刷时没有不适,62.37%的女性未来更有可能选择自我取样进行CCS,92.53%的人愿意向周围的人介绍这个概念。自抽样的可靠性和难易程度是影响自抽样选择的独立因素(p<0.05)。
    基于互联网自采样的HPV检测管理模式用于宫颈癌预防是可行和有效的。它可以作为常规筛选的补充,特别是在医疗资源匮乏的边远地区,提高CCS的覆盖率。
    https://www。chictr.org.cn,标识符:ChiCTR2000032331。
    Worldwide, around 18.2% of cervical cancer occurred in China, mainly because of lower screening coverage and screening quality in regional disparities. To assess self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, combined with the internet, as a primary cervical cancer screening (CCS) method in low-resource settings, and to establish an internet-based self-sampling CCS-management model.
    The women who participated registered on a CCS website. We recruited 20,136 women, aged 30-59 years, from 13 provinces in China, to perform vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing as a primary CCS, based on the internet. A questionnaire was subsequently used to investigate the acceptability of self-sampling.
    Of the 20,103 women with qualified samples, 35.80% lived in remote areas, 37.69% had never undergone CCS, 59.96% were under-screened, and the overall prevalence of a high-risk of HPV was 13.86%. Of 8,136 respondents, 95.97% of women felt that self-sampling was easy to perform, 84.61% had no discomfort when using a self-sampling brush, 62.37% women were more likely to choose self-sampling for CCS in future, and 92.53% were willing to introduce the concept to others around them. The reliability and ease of self-sampling were independent factors influencing selection of self-sampling (p < 0.05).
    The Internet-facilitated self-sampling for HPV testing and management model for cervical cancer prevention is feasible and effective. It can be used as a supplement to the conventional screening, particularly in outlying areas with few medical resources, to improve the coverage of CCS.
    https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2000032331.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:如果不治疗,围产期抑郁症会对妇女及其子女造成短期和长期的不良影响。心理干预,大多数围产期抑郁症女性的首选治疗方法,也可以在线提供。
    目的:本研究旨在对基于互联网的心理干预措施进行全面而系统的综述,并评估其在围产期抑郁症治疗中的有效性。
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:对六个数据库进行了系统的文献检索,包括CINAHL,PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,Cochrane图书馆和PsycINFO。抑郁和焦虑,这是这次搜索的主要和次要结果,以标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)表示。这项审查是根据PRISMA清单进行的。
    结果:共纳入13项研究,涉及2158名围产期妇女。内容,方法,基于互联网的心理干预的持续时间和频率各不相同。参与者对这些干预措施的满意度很高;参与者的辍学率从2.6%到60.8%不等。荟萃分析表明,基于互联网的心理干预可改善围产期抑郁症(SMD=-0.72,CI=[-1.02,-0.42],p<0.01)和焦虑症状(SMD=-0.52,CI=[-0.73,-0.30],p<.01),异质性分别为86%和59%,分别。
    结论:基于网络的心理干预被认为是围产期抑郁和焦虑的方便有效的替代治疗方法。在未来,需要更多的研究来调查这些干预措施对围产期妇女心理健康的长期影响,以及在控制辍学率的同时对婴儿生长发育的影响.
    结论:基于互联网的心理干预是改善围产期抑郁症状的创新方法,可以利用心理健康资源,提高可及性,同时促进多学科融合。的方法,内容,应综合考虑干预的频率和持续时间,以实现干预目标,同时保持围产期抑郁症妇女的依从性。
    BACKGROUND: Perinatal depression can result in short- and long-term adverse effects for women and their children if untreated. Psychological interventions, the preferred treatment for most women with perinatal depression, can also be provided online.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive and systematic review of Internet-based psychological interventions and to evaluate their effectiveness in the treatment of perinatal depression.
    METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted of six databases, including CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. Depression and anxiety, which were the primary and secondary results of this search, were presented as standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This review was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist.
    RESULTS: Thirteen studies involving 2158 perinatal women were included. Content, method, duration and frequency of Internet-based psychological interventions were varied. Participants indicated a high rate of satisfaction with these interventions; participants\' dropout rates ranged from 2.6% to 60.8%. Meta-analysis demonstrated that Internet-based psychological interventions improved perinatal depression (SMD = -0.72, CI = [-1.02, -0.42], p < .01) and anxiety symptoms (SMD = -0.52, CI = [-0.73, -0.30], p < .01), with heterogeneity of 86% and 59%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based psychological interventions are considered as convenient and effective alternative treatment for perinatal depression and anxiety. In the future, additional studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects of these interventions on the mental health of perinatal women and the effects on the growth and development of infants while controlling for the dropout rate.
    CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based psychological interventions are innovative approaches to improving perinatal depressive symptoms that can leverage mental health resources and improve accessibility while promoting multidisciplinary integration. The approach, content, frequency and duration of intervention should be considered comprehensively to achieve the objectives of the intervention while maintaining compliance of women with perinatal depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新型冠状病毒病COVID-19很可能在密切接触环境中在人与人之间传播。中国疾病预防控制中心发布了一本关于COVID-19的手册,向公众介绍了健康信息,具体涉及正确佩戴口罩和采取预防措施以避免COVID-19感染。
    这项研究的目的是评估面具知识的水平,与掩码使用相关的行为,以及中国用于获取口罩和COVID-19相关信息的主要信息渠道。
    一项基于互联网的调查主要使用鼎翔医生微信公众账号进行。收集并分析了有关面罩知识和行为的数据。除了描述性统计,使用logistic回归分析导致防护口罩行为的重要危险因素.
    该调查共收集了10304名受访者的数据。超过一半的受访者年龄在30岁以下,近四分之三是女性。超过80%的参与者拥有学士学位或更高学位,最大比例的受访者(n=4204,40.80%)受雇为商业/服务工作者。超过一半的研究参与者已婚(n=5302,51.46%)。调查结果显示,67.49%(6954/10,304)的参与者练习了防护口罩行为;97.93%(10,091/10,304)认为戴口罩是对抗COVID-19的有效保护措施;96.85%(9979/10,304)的参与者选择了两层或多层可清洗的口罩,透气面料;70.57%(7272/10,304)正确佩戴了口罩。性别,年龄,职业,教育水平对行为有显著影响,而婚姻状况和家庭成员的感染状况与戴口罩行为无显著相关。此外,微信公众账号(9227/10,304,89.55%)是COVID-19爆发后中国网民获取健康信息最突出的来源。
    这项研究表明,中国网民的防护口罩行为远远低于他们的口罩相关知识。改进的信息渠道和佩戴口罩的充分信息对于改善公众的防护口罩行为是必要的,尤其是在男性中,老年人,和受教育程度较低的人。
    The novel coronavirus disease COVID-19 is likely to spread from person to person in close-contact settings. The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention released a handbook on COVID-19, which introduced health information to the public, specifically related to wearing masks correctly and adopting preventive measures to avoid COVID-19 infection.
    The aim of this study was to assess the level of mask knowledge, behavior related to mask usage, and major information channels used for obtaining mask- and COVID-19-related information in China.
    An internet-based survey was conducted primarily using DingXiang Doctor WeChat public accounts. The data about mask knowledge and behavior were collected and analyzed. In addition to descriptive statistics, logistic regression was used to analyze significant risk factors contributing to protective mask behavior.
    Data were collected from a total of 10,304 respondents to the survey. More than half of the respondents were under 30 years old and nearly three-quarters were women. Over 80% of participants had a bachelor\'s degree or higher, and the largest proportion of respondents (n=4204, 40.80%) were employed as business/service workers. Over half of the study participants were married (n=5302, 51.46%). The findings revealed that 67.49% (6954/10,304) of the participants practiced protective mask behavior; 97.93% (10,091/10,304) believed that wearing masks is an effective protective measure against COVID-19; 96.85% (9979/10,304) chose a mask that has two or more layers of washable, breathable fabric; and 70.57% (7272/10,304) wore the masks correctly. Gender, age, occupation, and education level had significant effects on behavior, whereas marital status and the infection status of family members were not significantly related to mask-wearing behavior. In addition, WeChat public accounts (9227/10,304, 89.55%) were the most prominent source of obtaining health information for Chinese netizens after the outbreak of COVID-19.
    This study elucidated that Chinese netizens\' protective mask behavior is far lower than their mask-related knowledge. Improved information channels and adequate information on wearing masks are necessary to improve the public\'s protective mask behavior, particularly among men, the elderly, and people with less education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自杀的人很少寻求帮助,并主动接受专业的心理干预。与面对面的自杀干预相比,基于互联网的认知行为疗法(iCBT)可以提高可用性并减少污名。然而,关于iCBT对自杀的有效性的结论存在争议。该综述旨在确定iCBT在减少自杀意念(主要结果)和与自杀有关的其他结果(次要结果)方面的有效性。PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,截至2020年3月,EMBASE一直在寻找旨在减少自杀的iCBT的RCT。通过Cochrane偏差风险工具评估潜在偏差。由RevMan5.3进行数据分析。纳入了符合资格标准的四项研究,报告了总共1225名参与者的数据。我们发现iCBT与减少个体的自杀意念有关,和第一个迹象表明,治疗效果可能会在短期和成人更加明显。此外,没有足够的证据证明其在减少自杀企图和自杀死亡方面的有效性。总的来说,iCBT可以克服传统干预措施的缺点,并对自杀意念显示出希望。在确保安全和道德的同时,需要进一步的研究,专注于自杀的特定行为,如自杀未遂。
    Suicidal individuals rarely seek help and receive professional psychological intervention on their initiative. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy(iCBT) can increase availability and reduce stigma compared to face-to-face interventions for suicide.However, conclusions about the effectiveness of iCBT on suicide are controversial. The review aimed to determine the effectiveness of iCBT on reducing suicidal ideation (primary outcomes) and other outcomes related to suicide like suicide attempts(secondary outcomes). PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASEwere searched up to March 2020 for RCTs of iCBT which aimed to reduce suicide.The potential bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data analyses wereperformed by RevMan5.3.Four studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included which reported data on a total of 1225 participants. We found iCBT was associated with reducing an individual\'s suicidal ideation, and first indications suggest that the treatment effect might be even more pronounced in the short term and in adults.Additionally, there was insufficient evidence to prove its effectiveness in reducing suicide attempts and suicide death.Overall, iCBT can overcome the disadvantages of traditional interventions and show promise on suicidal ideation. While ensuring safety and ethics, further studies are warranted, focusing on suicide specific behavior like suicide attempts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:亚临床抑郁症是一种普遍存在的心理健康问题,增加了主要情绪障碍的发病率。如抑郁症(MDD)。心理干预已被证明可以有效减轻亚临床抑郁症患者的抑郁症状,并可以预防MDD的发作。然而,人们接受面对面心理治疗的机会有限。基于互联网的心理干预是一种替代治疗选择。该研究的目的是评估MoodBox的疗效,在线心理干预计划,亚临床抑郁症。方法:本研究是一个多中心,随机化,控制,三个平行组的非盲优势研究。将招募435名患有亚临床抑郁症的一年级大学生。符合条件的参与者将被随机分配到MoodBox组,在线心理教育小组,和自然观察组的比例为1:1:1。干预期为8周,参与者将连续随访1年。该研究的主要结果是干预措施的有效性,由患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)测量。讨论:这是第一项创新开发和测试干预措施的研究,以改善中国亚临床抑郁症人群的心理健康并降低MDD的发生率。一旦证明有效和可接受,MoodBox可能会整合到常规临床服务中,以促进对亚临床抑郁症患者的管理。临床试验注册:该试验于2020年7月21日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(编号:ChiCTR2000034826)。
    Background: Subclinical depression is a prevalent mental health problem and increases the incidence of the onset of major mood disorders, such as major depressive disorder (MDD). Psychological interventions have been proved to be effective for reducing depressive symptoms for people with subclinical depression and can prevent the onset of MDD. However, people have limited access to face-to-face psychotherapy. Internet-based psychological intervention is an alternative treatment option. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of MoodBox, an online psychological intervention program, for subclinical depression. Methods: This study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-blinded superiority study with three parallel groups. A total of 435 first-year university students with subclinical depression will be recruited. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to the MoodBox group, the online psychoeducation group, and the naturalistic observation group at a ratio of 1:1:1. The intervention period is 8 weeks, and participants will be continuously followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome of the study is the efficacy of the intervention, defined as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Discussion: This is the first study to innovatively develop and test an intervention to improve psychological well-being and decrease the incidence of MDD in a subclinical depression population in China. Once proven effective and acceptable, MoodBox could be potentially integrated into the routine clinical service to facilitate the management for people with subclinical depression. Clinical Trial Registration: The trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 21 July 2020 (No. ChiCTR2000034826).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号