Internet-based

基于互联网
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:人们对开发可扩展的干预措施越来越感兴趣,包括基于互联网的认知行为疗法(iCBT),以满足日益增长的精神卫生服务需求。鉴于全球多样性的增长,iCBT治疗抑郁症的临床试验必须包括不同的样本,至少,报告比赛信息,种族,或其样本的其他背景指标。不幸的是,该领域缺乏关于目前在iCBT文献中报道和代表多样性的数据.
    目标:因此,本系统综述的主要目的是研究已发表的iCBT治疗抑郁症的临床试验中有关种族和族裔身份的总体报告.我们还旨在审查特定种族和族裔少数族裔群体的代表性,并纳入替代背景指标,如移民身份或居住国。
    方法:如果是将iCBT与等待名单进行比较的随机对照试验,照常护理,主动控制,或另一个iCBT。纳入的论文还必须关注急性治疗(例如,4周至6个月)的抑郁症,通过互联网在网站或智能手机应用程序上交付,并使用有指导或无指导的自助。研究最初是从METAPSY数据库(n=59)中确定的,然后扩展到包括2022年之前的论文,论文从Embase检索,PubMed,PsycINFO,和Cochrane(n=3)。偏倚风险评估表明,由于使用自我报告结果测量,报告的研究至少有一些偏倚风险。
    结果:本研究总结了总共62项iCBT随机对照试验,代表17,210名参与者。在这62篇论文中,只有17(27%)的试验报告种族,只有12人(19%)报告了种族。美国以外的报道非常糟糕,在17项报告种族的研究中,美国占15项(88%),在12项报告种族的研究中,美国占9项(75%)。在系统评价中报告的3,623名参与者中,报告最多的种族类别是白人(n=2716,74.9%),其次是亚洲(n=209,5.8%)和黑人(n=274,7.6%)。此外,在美国以外进行的46篇论文中,只有25篇(54%)报道了其他背景人口统计数据.
    结论:重要的是要注意,在本研究中观察到的漏报并不一定表明在实际研究人群中存在漏报。然而,这些发现凸显了文献中发现的iCBT抑郁症试验中种族和民族的不良报道.这种缺乏多样性报告可能对这些干预措施的可扩展性产生重大影响。
    BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in developing scalable interventions, including internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT), to meet the increasing demand for mental health services. Given the growth in diversity worldwide, it is essential that the clinical trials of iCBT for depression include diverse samples or, at least, report information on the race, ethnicity, or other background indicators of their samples. Unfortunately, the field lacks data on how well diversity is currently reported and represented in the iCBT literature.
    OBJECTIVE: Thus, the main objective of this systematic review was to examine the overall reporting of racial and ethnic identities in published clinical trials of iCBT for depression. We also aimed to review the representation of specific racial and ethnic minoritized groups and the inclusion of alternative background indicators such as migration status or country of residence.
    METHODS: Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials in which iCBT was compared to a waiting list, care-as-usual, active control, or another iCBT. The included papers also had to have a focus on acute treatment (eg, 4 weeks to 6 months) of depression, be delivered via the internet on a website or a smartphone app and use guided or unguided self-help. Studies were initially identified from the METAPSY database (n=59) and then extended to include papers up to 2022, with papers retrieved from Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane (n=3). Risk of bias assessment suggested that reported studies had at least some risk of bias due to use of self-report outcome measures.
    RESULTS: A total of 62 iCBT randomized controlled trials representing 17,210 participants are summarized in this study. Out of those 62 papers, only 17 (27%) of the trials reported race, and only 12 (19%) reported ethnicity. Reporting outside of the United States was very poor, with the United States accounting for 15 (88%) out of 17 of studies that reported race and 9 (75%) out of 12 for ethnicity. Out of 3,623 participants whose race was reported in the systematic review, the racial category reported the most was White (n=2716, 74.9%), followed by Asian (n=209, 5.8%) and Black (n=274, 7.6%). Furthermore, only 25 (54%) out of the 46 papers conducted outside of the United States reported other background demographics.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is important to note that the underreporting observed in this study does not necessarily indicate an underrepresentation in the actual study population. However, these findings highlight the poor reporting of race and ethnicity in iCBT trials for depression found in the literature. This lack of diversity reporting may have significant implications for the scalability of these interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项荟萃分析旨在评估基于互联网的自助干预措施对青少年和大学生心理健康的影响。
    我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价,该试验调查了基于互联网的自助干预措施,旨在减轻焦虑和抑郁等心理健康症状,以及管理高水平的压力,在青少年和大学生中。我们的搜索跨越了包括WebofScience在内的数据库,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,和Embase,直到11月1日,2022年。必须强调的是,我们的重点是对症状的评估(持续的结果),而不是特定精神障碍的诊断。使用R版本4.3.1进行荟萃分析。效应大小测量为标准化平均差(SMD),和随机效应模型用于汇集来自符合条件的随机对照试验的数据。进行了亚组分析,以检查基于样本类型等因素的干预效果的变化,干预方式,导向型,和干预持续时间。
    荟萃分析基于25个比较,涉及4480名参与者。与对照组(n=2125)相比,接受干预的参与者(n=2355)报告焦虑症状显著减轻,抑郁症,和压力,以及生活质量的显著提高。具体来说,对于抑郁症,我们观察到中度干预效果(SMD=-0.42,95%CI:-0.56,-0.27),在生活质量方面也观察到了类似的模式(SMD=0.36,95CI:0.22,0.49)。对焦虑(SMD=-0.35,95%CI[-0.48,-0.22])和应激(SMD=-0.35,95%CI[-0.51,-0.20])的干预效果较小。鉴于显著的异质性,对焦虑和抑郁进行亚组分析,考虑样品类型等因素,干预方法,和干预持续时间。值得注意的是,与青少年相比,大学生在缓解焦虑和抑郁方面的获益更大。长期干预(>8周)在减少焦虑和抑郁方面特别有效。此外,第三波认知行为疗法(CBT)在两种结局指标中均显示出明显的干预效果,而指导的存在并没有显著影响结果.
    这项荟萃分析强调了基于互联网的自助计划在缓解青少年和大学生心理障碍症状方面的积极影响。然而,必须承认现有证据显示不一致和局限性。因此,使用严格方法的进一步研究对于验证和扩大本荟萃分析的发现是必要的.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of Internet-based self-help interventions on the mental health of adolescents and college students.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated Internet-based self-help interventions aiming to mitigate mental health symptoms such as anxiety and depression, as well as managing high levels of stress, among adolescents and college students. Our search spanned databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, up until November 1st, 2022. It is essential to emphasize that our focus was the evaluation of symptoms (continuous outcomes), rather than the diagnosis of specific mental disorders. The meta-analysis was performed using the R version 4.3.1. The effect size measure was the standardized mean difference (SMD), and random-effects models were used to pool data from eligible RCTs. Subgroup analyses were carried out to examine variations in intervention effects based on factors such as sample type, intervention modality, guidance type, and intervention duration.
    UNASSIGNED: The meta-analysis was based on 25 comparisons involving a total of 4480 participants. In comparison to the control group (n = 2125), participants receiving interventions (n = 2355) reported significant reductions in symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress, along with a significant improvement in quality of life. Specifically, for depression, we observed moderate intervention effects (SMD = -0.42, 95 % CI: -0.56, -0.27), and a similar pattern was seen for quality of life (SMD = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.22, 0.49). Small intervention effects were found for anxiety (SMD = -0.35, 95 % CI [-0.48, -0.22]) and stress (SMD = -0.35, 95 % CI [-0.51, -0.20]). Given significant heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were conducted for anxiety and depression, considering factors such as sample type, intervention method, and intervention duration. Notably, college students experienced more significant benefits in both anxiety and depression alleviation compared to adolescents. Longer interventions (>8 weeks) were particularly effective in reducing anxiety and depression. Additionally, third-wave cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) showed pronounced intervention effects in both outcome measures, while the presence of guidance did not notably influence results.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis underscores the positive impact of Internet-based self-help programs in alleviating the symptoms of psychological disorders among adolescents and college students. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the available evidence exhibits inconsistencies and limitations. Therefore, further research utilizing rigorous methodologies is necessary to verify and broaden the findings of this meta-analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    认知行为疗法(CBT)被广泛认为是强迫症(OCD)的有效治疗方法。然而,很少有患者能够接受CBT。基于互联网的CBT(ICBT)可能能够克服这个问题。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较CBT的疗效,治疗师指导的ICBT(TG-ICBT),无指导的ICBT(UG-ICBT),和无治疗师指导的ICBT(NTG-ICBT)通过网络荟萃分析。主要结果是强迫症严重程度的平均变化,采用耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)或儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(CY-BOCS)。次要结果包括抑郁症状的严重程度,副作用,和成本效益。共纳入25项试验,1642名参与者。我们发现CBT的疗效优于TG-ICBT。CBT组Y-BOCS/CY-BOCS评分平均改善高于UG-ICBT组,但这种差异没有统计学意义。TG-ICBT和UG-ICBT之间的疗效没有显着差异。CBT,TG-ICBT,UG-ICBT比心理安慰剂更有效,等候名单,和安慰剂。就功效而言,CBT联合药物治疗优于CBT,TG-ICBT,UG-ICBT。敏感性分析支持这些发现。根据目前的证据,当CBT不可用时,我们推荐TG-ICBT。然而,不可否认,UG-ICBT也有可能成为CBT的有效替代品。需要更多的证据来支持这种可能性。
    Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is widely recognized as an effective treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, few patients are able to receive CBT. Internet-based CBT (ICBT) may be able to overcome this problem. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of CBT, therapist-guided ICBT (TG-ICBT), unguided ICBT (UG-ICBT), and none therapist-guided ICBT (NTG-ICBT) by a network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the mean change in OCD severity measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) or the Children\'s Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS). The secondary outcomes included the severity of depressive symptoms, side effects, and cost-effectiveness. A total of 25 trials with 1642 participants were included. We found that the efficacy of CBT was superior to that of TG-ICBT. The mean improvement in Y-BOCS/CY-BOCS scores was higher in CBT group than in UG-ICBT group, but this difference was not statistically significant. The efficacy did not differ significantly between TG-ICBT and UG-ICBT. CBT, TG-ICBT, and UG-ICBT were all more effective than the psychological placebo, waiting list, and pill placebo. In terms of efficacy, CBT combined with drug therapy was better than CBT, TG-ICBT, and UG-ICBT. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings. Based on the current evidence, we recommend TG-ICBT when CBT is not available. However, it is undeniable that UG-ICBT also has the potential to be an effective alternative to CBT. More evidence is needed to support this possibility.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:本次范围审查将确定如何在线,对儿童进行随机试验.审查的目标是:(a)确定使用了哪些方法和工具来创建和进行儿童在线试验,以及(b)确定该领域知识的差距。在过去的十年里,采用在线方法的随机试验获得了关注。分散的方法适合某些类型的试验,并且可以提供优于传统试验方法的优势。潜在增加参与者的覆盖面和多样性,减少研究浪费。然而,分散试验的所有方面都只在网上进行,目前还不常见,而那些涉及儿童的人更少。本范围审查将描述和评估这些试验中使用的方法,以了解如何有效地使用它们。方法:方法由JoannaBriggs研究所的指导和系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的Meta分析扩展提供。搜索策略是与以下数据库的信息专家协商制定的:MEDLINE,中部,CINAHL,和Embase。灰色文献搜索将在分散式试验和数字健康专家的咨询下完成,使用互联网搜索和合适的试验注册。一旦确定,纳入的全文研究\'参考文献将手动搜索可能遗漏的任何试验.我们将包括完全在线进行的随机和准随机试验,参与者年龄在18岁以下,以英文发表。我们不会限制行为国家或发布日期。数据将使用数据图表工具收集并以文本形式显示,图形,和表格格式。道德和传播:不需要道德批准,因为使用的所有数据源都是公开可用的。该评论将在开放获取发布之前作为预印本提供,同行评审期刊。
    Introduction: This scoping review will determine how online, randomised trials with children are conducted. The objectives of the review are: (a) to determine what methods and tools have been used to create and conduct online trials with children and (b) to identify the gaps in the knowledge in this field. Over the last decade, randomised trials employing online methods have gained traction. Decentralised methods lend themselves to certain types of trials and can offer advantages over traditional trial methods, potentially increasing participant reach and diversity and decreasing research waste.  However, decentralised trials that have all aspects of the trial exclusively online are not yet common, and those involving children even less so. This scoping review will describe and evaluate the methods used in these trials to understand how they may be effectively employed. Methods: Methods are informed by guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews. The search strategy was developed in consultation with an information specialist for the following databases: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Embase. Grey literature searches will be completed with the consultation of experts in decentralised trials and digital health using internet searches and suitable trial registries. Once identified, included full-text studies\' references will be manually searched for any trials that may have been missed. We will include randomised and quasi-randomised trials conducted exclusively online with participants under the age of 18 published in English. We will not limit by country of conduct or date of publication. Data will be collected using a data charting tool and presented in text, graphical, and tabular formats. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval is not needed since all data sources used are publicly available. The review will be available as a preprint before publication in an open-access, peer-reviewed journal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:探讨基于网络的自我管理干预对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者肺功能的影响。
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:八个电子数据库,包括PubMed,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,Embase,CINAHL,中国国家知识基础设施,从数据库开始到2022年1月10日,对王方和维普数据库进行了系统搜索。
    方法:使用ReviewManager5.4进行统计分析,结果报告为平均差(MD)或标准平均差(SMD),95%置信区间(CI)。结果是1秒内用力呼气量(FEV1),强制卷容量(FVC)和FEV1/FVC百分比。使用Cochrane偏差风险工具评估纳入研究的偏差风险。研究方案未注册。
    结果:包括476名参与者在内的8项随机对照试验(RCT)符合纳入标准,并纳入荟萃分析。研究发现,基于互联网的自我管理干预措施在FVC(L)、而FEV1(%),FEV1(L),FEV1/FVC(%)和FVC(%)没有显著改良。
    结论:基于互联网的自我管理干预措施可有效改善COPD患者的肺功能,在解释结果时应谨慎行事。未来需要更高质量的随机对照试验来进一步证明干预的有效性。
    结论:它为基于互联网的自我管理干预措施改善COPD患者的肺功能提供了证据。
    结论:结果表明,基于网络的自我管理干预措施可以改善COPD患者的肺功能。这项研究为难以寻求面对面自我管理干预措施的COPD患者提供了一种有希望的替代方法。和干预可以应用于临床设置。
    没有患者或公共捐款。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of internet-based self-management interventions on pulmonary function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
    METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: Eight electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Embase, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang and Weipu databases were systematically searched from inception of the database to January 10, 2022.
    METHODS: Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 and results were reported as mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Outcomes were the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced volume capacity (FVC) and percent of FEV1/FVC. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the risk of bias of included studies. The study protocol was not registered.
    RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 476 participants met the inclusion criteria and were included in meta-analysis. It was found that internet-based self-management interventions showed a significant improvement in FVC(L), while FEV1 (%), FEV1 (L), FEV1/FVC (%) and FVC (%) did not significantly improve.
    CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based self-management interventions were effective in improving pulmonary function in patients with COPD, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results. RCTs of higher quality are needed in the future to further demonstrate the effectiveness of the intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: It provides evidence for internet-based self-management interventions in improving pulmonary function in patients with COPD.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that internet-based self-management interventions could improve the pulmonary function in people with COPD. This study provides a promising alternative method for patients with COPD who have difficulty seeking face-to-face self-management interventions, and the intervention can be applied in clinical settings.
    UNASSIGNED: No Patient or Public Contribution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心理健康已成为工作场所中日益重要的问题。非医护人员在工作场所出现的心理症状加重,特别是在COVID-19大流行期间,这限制了社会互动和卫生服务的获取。这些情况对员工的心理健康有负面影响,也可能与工作相关的结果有关。例如降低工作投入水平。认知行为疗法(CBT)是用于治疗患有精神疾病和预防与工作相关的心理后果的最有效方法之一。基于互联网的CBT(iCBT)的交付是由于影响健康促进和预防组件的技术改进而建立的,以及有限的社会接触和卫生服务。
    目的:本系统评价的目的是综合有关iCBT对员工的预防作用的现有最佳证据。
    方法:将在12个电子数据库中进行系统搜索,包括手动搜索主要期刊和参考列表。测试iCBT对员工心理结果和工作投入的影响的随机对照试验将符合资格。最初的关键词将涵盖员工的概念,工人,非卫生保健人员,基于互联网,基于网络的,电子健康认知行为干预,压力,抑郁症,焦虑,和工作投入,然后将开发完整的搜索策略。在标题之后,摘要和全文将根据审查的纳入标准进行评估。搜索结果将根据系统评论和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行全面报告和呈现。两名独立的审阅者将筛选和提取数据,使用Cochrane偏差风险评估工具评估方法学质量,并通过建议分级评估来评估证据的总体质量,发展,和评价方法。使用审查管理器软件的随机效应荟萃分析和标准化平均差异将用于基于类似结果综合iCBT的影响。
    结果:该方案于2022年3月在国际前瞻性系统审查登记册中注册,目前正在进行中。数据将于2022年8月进行分析,审查过程应于2022年12月完成。所有纳入的研究都将进行综合和展示,以证明iCBT在减少员工心理困扰和优化工作敬业度方面的有效性。
    结论:根据本研究的结果,iCBT疗法将用于促进精神健康问题,如抑郁症状,焦虑,心理困扰,压力,失眠,以及非医疗保健专业人员的韧性。此外,结果将用于确保与减少心理困扰和优化工作场所工作参与度有关的政策。
    未经批准:PRR1-10.2196/38597。
    BACKGROUND: Mental health has become an increasingly significant issue in the workplace. Non-health care workers are experiencing increased levels of psychological symptoms in their workplaces, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, which limited social interactions and health service access. These conditions have a negative effect on employees\' mental health and may also be associated with work-related outcomes, such as reduced levels of work engagement. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most effective methods used for treating workers with mental illness and preventing work-related psychological outcomes. The delivery of internet-based CBT (iCBT) has been established as a result of both technological improvements that have influenced health promotion and prevention components, and limited social contact and health service access.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the best available evidence concerning the preventive effect of iCBT on employees.
    METHODS: A systematic search will be conducted across 12 electronic databases, including a hand search for main journals and reference lists. Randomized controlled trials testing the effects of iCBT on psychological outcomes and work engagement among employees will be eligible. Initial keywords will cover the concepts of employees, workers, non-health care personnel, internet-based, web-based, eHealth cognitive behavioral interventions, stress, depression, anxiety, and work engagement, and then a full search strategy will be developed. Following titles, abstracts and the full text will be screened for assessment against the inclusion criteria for the review. Search results will be fully reported and presented per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Two independent reviewers will screen and extract data, appraise methodological quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool, and assess overall quality of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. A random effects meta-analysis and standardized mean differences using review manager software will be applied to synthesize the effect of iCBT based on similar outcomes.
    RESULTS: This protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews in March 2022 and is now an ongoing process. The data will be analyzed in August 2022, and the review process should be completed by December 2022. All included studies will be synthesized and presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of iCBT in decreasing psychological distress and optimizing work engagement outcomes among employees.
    CONCLUSIONS: According to the findings of this study, iCBT therapies will be used to promote mental health concerns such as depressive symptoms, anxiety, psychological distress, stress, insomnia, and resilience among non-health care professionals. In addition, the results will be used to ensure the policy related to reducing psychological distress and optimizing work engagement in the workplace.
    UNASSIGNED: PRR1-10.2196/38597.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    战略沟通是卫生机构的关键问题。在过去的十年里,通过社交媒体和网站进行的医疗保健沟通产生了大量研究,研究了沟通策略的不同现实。然而,当涉及到系统审查时,关于这种交流有零碎的证据。
    本系统综述的目的是总结网络机构健康交流的证据,供公共卫生当局根据这些现有研究评估可能的目标特定关键点。
    在PRISMA(系统审查和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)声明的指导下,从2011年1月1日至2021年10月7日,我们对2个电子数据库(PubMed和WebofScience)进行了全面审查,寻找调查机构卫生交流的研究.总的来说,2名独立研究人员(AN和SS)审查了纳入的文章,方法质量的评估基于Kmet评估清单。
    共选择78篇。大多数研究(35/78,45%)针对健康促进和疾病预防,其次是危机沟通(24/78,31%),一般健康状况(13/78,17%),以及错误信息纠正和健康促进(6/78,8%)。参与和消息框架是分析最多的方面。很少有研究(14/78,18%)关注运动的有效性。只有23%(18/78)的研究有实验设计。Kmet评估用于区分呈现固体结构的研究与缺乏研究。特别是,考虑到0.75点的阈值,36%(28/78)的研究被排除。高于此阈值的研究用于确定一系列特定于目标和特定于媒介的建议,因为使用的沟通策略差异很大。
    总的来说,研究结果表明,在基于网络的医疗保健沟通的情况下,没有单一的策略效果最好。结果的极端可变性以及缺乏评估特定活动或研究终点的统一措施,导致我们重新考虑用于评估基于网络的健康交流有效性的工具。
    Communicating strategically is a key issue for health organizations. Over the past decade, health care communication via social media and websites has generated a great deal of studies examining different realities of communication strategies. However, when it comes to systematic reviews, there is fragmentary evidence on this type of communication.
    The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence on web institutional health communication for public health authorities to evaluate possible aim-specific key points based on these existing studies.
    Guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, we conducted a comprehensive review across 2 electronic databases (PubMed and Web of Science) from January 1, 2011, to October 7, 2021, searching for studies investigating institutional health communication. In total, 2 independent researchers (AN and SS) reviewed the articles for inclusion, and the assessment of methodological quality was based on the Kmet appraisal checklist.
    A total of 78 articles were selected. Most studies (35/78, 45%) targeted health promotion and disease prevention, followed by crisis communication (24/78, 31%), general health (13/78, 17%), and misinformation correction and health promotion (6/78, 8%). Engagement and message framing were the most analyzed aspects. Few studies (14/78, 18%) focused on campaign effectiveness. Only 23% (18/78) of the studies had an experimental design. The Kmet evaluation was used to distinguish studies presenting a solid structure from lacking studies. In particular, considering the 0.75-point threshold, 36% (28/78) of the studies were excluded. Studies above this threshold were used to identify a series of aim-specific and medium-specific suggestions as the communication strategies used differed greatly.
    Overall, the findings suggest that no single strategy works best in the case of web-based health care communication. The extreme variability of outcomes and the lack of a unitary measure for assessing the end points of a specific campaign or study lead us to reconsider the tools we use to evaluate the efficacy of web-based health communication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:如果不治疗,围产期抑郁症会对妇女及其子女造成短期和长期的不良影响。心理干预,大多数围产期抑郁症女性的首选治疗方法,也可以在线提供。
    目的:本研究旨在对基于互联网的心理干预措施进行全面而系统的综述,并评估其在围产期抑郁症治疗中的有效性。
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:对六个数据库进行了系统的文献检索,包括CINAHL,PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,Cochrane图书馆和PsycINFO。抑郁和焦虑,这是这次搜索的主要和次要结果,以标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)表示。这项审查是根据PRISMA清单进行的。
    结果:共纳入13项研究,涉及2158名围产期妇女。内容,方法,基于互联网的心理干预的持续时间和频率各不相同。参与者对这些干预措施的满意度很高;参与者的辍学率从2.6%到60.8%不等。荟萃分析表明,基于互联网的心理干预可改善围产期抑郁症(SMD=-0.72,CI=[-1.02,-0.42],p<0.01)和焦虑症状(SMD=-0.52,CI=[-0.73,-0.30],p<.01),异质性分别为86%和59%,分别。
    结论:基于网络的心理干预被认为是围产期抑郁和焦虑的方便有效的替代治疗方法。在未来,需要更多的研究来调查这些干预措施对围产期妇女心理健康的长期影响,以及在控制辍学率的同时对婴儿生长发育的影响.
    结论:基于互联网的心理干预是改善围产期抑郁症状的创新方法,可以利用心理健康资源,提高可及性,同时促进多学科融合。的方法,内容,应综合考虑干预的频率和持续时间,以实现干预目标,同时保持围产期抑郁症妇女的依从性。
    BACKGROUND: Perinatal depression can result in short- and long-term adverse effects for women and their children if untreated. Psychological interventions, the preferred treatment for most women with perinatal depression, can also be provided online.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive and systematic review of Internet-based psychological interventions and to evaluate their effectiveness in the treatment of perinatal depression.
    METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted of six databases, including CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. Depression and anxiety, which were the primary and secondary results of this search, were presented as standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This review was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist.
    RESULTS: Thirteen studies involving 2158 perinatal women were included. Content, method, duration and frequency of Internet-based psychological interventions were varied. Participants indicated a high rate of satisfaction with these interventions; participants\' dropout rates ranged from 2.6% to 60.8%. Meta-analysis demonstrated that Internet-based psychological interventions improved perinatal depression (SMD = -0.72, CI = [-1.02, -0.42], p < .01) and anxiety symptoms (SMD = -0.52, CI = [-0.73, -0.30], p < .01), with heterogeneity of 86% and 59%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based psychological interventions are considered as convenient and effective alternative treatment for perinatal depression and anxiety. In the future, additional studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects of these interventions on the mental health of perinatal women and the effects on the growth and development of infants while controlling for the dropout rate.
    CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based psychological interventions are innovative approaches to improving perinatal depressive symptoms that can leverage mental health resources and improve accessibility while promoting multidisciplinary integration. The approach, content, frequency and duration of intervention should be considered comprehensively to achieve the objectives of the intervention while maintaining compliance of women with perinatal depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管悲伤及其症状构成了对损失经历的正常反应,一些受影响的人在长时间后仍然报告痛苦水平升高,通常被称为复杂的悲伤。面对面疗法的有益治疗效果,例如,针对复杂悲伤的悲伤咨询或认知行为疗法,已被报道。目前缺乏针对丧亲者悲伤症状的基于互联网和移动的干预措施的客观质量标准的评估。
    目的:我们旨在对基于互联网和移动的干预措施对丧亲后悲伤症状的有效性和可行性进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:我们根据PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,对2020年1月9日前发表的随机对照试验或可行性研究进行了系统文献检索。在PubMed中,PsycINFO,WebofScience核心合集,还有Cochrane图书馆.使用建议分级评估证据质量,评估,发展,和评估系统。我们使用精神卫生保健专家小组(德国精神病学协会,心理治疗,和心形)。进行随机效应荟萃分析以评估组间效应大小。
    结果:总计,包括9项试验(N=1349)。其中,7项研究进行了荟萃分析。对悲伤症状有显著影响(g=0.54,95%CI0.32-0.77),抑郁症(g=0.44,95%CI0.20-0.68),和创伤后应激(g=0.82,95%CI0.63-1.01)。悲伤和抑郁的异质性中等(I2=48.75%和55.19%,分别)和低创伤后应激症状(I2=0%)。证据的总体质量从低(悲伤和抑郁)到中等(创伤后应激)。用户对干预措施的满意度很高,使用客观质量标准评估干预措施的质量也是如此.
    结论:基于互联网或移动的干预措施可能是一种有效治疗失去亲人的成年人悲伤症状的方法。然而,纳入审查的样本量小,研究数量有限,需要进一步调查.
    背景:国际前瞻性系统评论注册(PROSPERO)CRD42012002100;https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?RecordID=131428。
    BACKGROUND: Although grief and its symptoms constitute a normal reaction to experiences of loss, some of those affected still report elevated levels of distress after an extended period, often termed complicated grief. Beneficial treatment effects of face-to-face therapies, for example, grief counseling or cognitive behavioral therapy against complicated grief, have been reported. Evaluations of internet- and mobile-based interventions targeting symptoms of grief in bereaved individuals with regard to objective quality criteria are currently lacking.
    OBJECTIVE: We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness and feasibility of internet- and mobile-based interventions against symptoms of grief after bereavement.
    METHODS: We conducted systematic literature searches of randomized controlled trials or feasibility studies published before January 9, 2020, following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system. We further assessed aspects of feasibility and rated quality of interventions using criteria suggested by an expert panel on mental health care (German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to assess between-group effect sizes.
    RESULTS: In total, 9 trials (N=1349) were included. Of these, 7 studies were analyzed meta-analytically. Significant effects were found for symptoms of grief (g=0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.77), depression (g=0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.68), and posttraumatic stress (g=0.82, 95% CI 0.63-1.01). Heterogeneity was moderate for grief and depression (I2=48.75% and 55.19%, respectively) and low for posttraumatic stress symptoms (I2=0%). The overall quality of evidence was graded low (grief and depression) to moderate (posttraumatic stress). User satisfaction with the interventions was high, as was the quality of the interventions assessed using objective quality criteria.
    CONCLUSIONS: Internet- or mobile-based interventions might constitute an effective treatment approach against symptoms of grief in bereaved adults. However, the small sample sizes and limited number of studies included in the review warrant further investigation.
    BACKGROUND: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42012002100; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=131428.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自杀的人很少寻求帮助,并主动接受专业的心理干预。与面对面的自杀干预相比,基于互联网的认知行为疗法(iCBT)可以提高可用性并减少污名。然而,关于iCBT对自杀的有效性的结论存在争议。该综述旨在确定iCBT在减少自杀意念(主要结果)和与自杀有关的其他结果(次要结果)方面的有效性。PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,截至2020年3月,EMBASE一直在寻找旨在减少自杀的iCBT的RCT。通过Cochrane偏差风险工具评估潜在偏差。由RevMan5.3进行数据分析。纳入了符合资格标准的四项研究,报告了总共1225名参与者的数据。我们发现iCBT与减少个体的自杀意念有关,和第一个迹象表明,治疗效果可能会在短期和成人更加明显。此外,没有足够的证据证明其在减少自杀企图和自杀死亡方面的有效性。总的来说,iCBT可以克服传统干预措施的缺点,并对自杀意念显示出希望。在确保安全和道德的同时,需要进一步的研究,专注于自杀的特定行为,如自杀未遂。
    Suicidal individuals rarely seek help and receive professional psychological intervention on their initiative. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy(iCBT) can increase availability and reduce stigma compared to face-to-face interventions for suicide.However, conclusions about the effectiveness of iCBT on suicide are controversial. The review aimed to determine the effectiveness of iCBT on reducing suicidal ideation (primary outcomes) and other outcomes related to suicide like suicide attempts(secondary outcomes). PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASEwere searched up to March 2020 for RCTs of iCBT which aimed to reduce suicide.The potential bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data analyses wereperformed by RevMan5.3.Four studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included which reported data on a total of 1225 participants. We found iCBT was associated with reducing an individual\'s suicidal ideation, and first indications suggest that the treatment effect might be even more pronounced in the short term and in adults.Additionally, there was insufficient evidence to prove its effectiveness in reducing suicide attempts and suicide death.Overall, iCBT can overcome the disadvantages of traditional interventions and show promise on suicidal ideation. While ensuring safety and ethics, further studies are warranted, focusing on suicide specific behavior like suicide attempts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号