背景:绒毛膜癌是一种高度侵袭性的,恶性滋养细胞肿瘤,可以是妊娠或非妊娠起源。准确区分这两种亚型,致病妊娠类型,妊娠绒毛膜癌的妊娠至治疗间隔对于临床治疗至关重要。
方法:采用多重荧光聚合酶链反应扩增15个短串联重复序列(STR)位点和釉原蛋白位点(XY测定)对15个绒毛膜癌进行基因分型。比较了来自肿瘤和母体组织的每个基因座的基因型模式,和任何先前或同时发生的痣/胎盘也进行了比较。根据STR结果显示是否存在父系染色体补体,确定了肿瘤的妊娠或非妊娠起源以及致病妊娠的性质.
结果:14个肿瘤为妊娠。其中,七个是雄激素/纯合XX,两个是雄激素/杂合XX,表明原因妊娠是磨牙妊娠。在九次磨牙怀孕中,五个是神秘类型的。一名绝经期患者从七年前发生的痣发展出肿瘤,通过来自肿瘤和先前葡萄胎的遗传相同的等位基因鉴定。源自先前葡萄胎的一个肿瘤因足月分娩而中断。产后八周发现的两个肿瘤被确定为起源于先前的隐匿性痣。从遗传上不同的妊娠晚期子宫内胎盘中分离出盆腔绒毛膜癌。五个妊娠肿瘤是双亲:2XX,3XY。在三个卵巢肿瘤中,两个被确认为妊娠(1个雄激素/纯合XX;1个双亲XY),一个是卵巢肿瘤(XX),所有15个基因座的基因型完全匹配,因此确定其非妊娠起源。
结论:妊娠绒毛膜癌可以以雄激素或双亲方式起源。大多数是雄激素/纯合XX,而其中大量可能是隐匿性磨牙怀孕。异位雄激素性绒毛膜癌并发宫内胎盘的起源可能来自分散的双胎妊娠(葡萄胎和共存的非磨牙胎儿)或先前的磨牙妊娠。产后不久的绒毛膜癌可能与最后一个胎盘无关。STR分析可用于区分妊娠绒毛膜癌与非妊娠绒毛膜癌,以及原因性怀孕,并作为指导临床管理的有用检查工具。
BACKGROUND: Choriocarcinoma is a highly aggressive, malignant trophoblastic neoplasm that can be gestational or non-gestational in origin. Accurate discrimination between these two subtypes, the causative pregnancy type, and the pregnancy-to-treatment interval for gestational choriocarcinoma are vital for clinical management.
METHODS: Fifteen choriocarcinomas were genotyped using multiplex fluorescent polymerase chain reaction amplification of 15 short tandem repeat (STR) loci and the amelogenin locus (XY determination). Genotype patterns at each locus from tumoral and maternal tissues were compared, and any prior or concurrent mole/placenta was also compared when available. According to STR results showing the presence or absence of the paternal chromosomal complement, the gestational or non-gestational origin of the tumor and the nature of the causative pregnancy was identified.
RESULTS: Fourteen tumors were gestational. Of these, seven were androgenetic/homozygous XX, and two were androgenetic/heterozygous XX, indicating that the causative pregnancies were molar pregnancies. Among the nine molar pregnancies, five were of the occult type. A menopausal patient developed a tumor from a mole that occurred seven years ago, identified by the genetically identical allele from the tumor and prior mole. One tumor originating from a previous mole was interrupted by term delivery. Two tumors found eight weeks postpartum were identified as originating from a prior occult mole. A pelvic choriocarcinoma was separated from a genetically distinct third trimester intrauterine placenta. Five gestational tumors were biparental: 2 XX, 3 XY. Of three ovarian tumors, two were confirmed gestational (1 androgenetic/homozygous XX; 1 biparental XY), and one was an ovarian tumor (XX) with a complete match of the genotype for all 15 loci, therefore ascertaining its non-gestational origin.
CONCLUSIONS: Gestational choriocarcinoma can originate in an androgenetic or biparental manner. The majority are androgenetic/homozygous XX, while a large number of them might be occult molar pregnancies. The origin of ectopic androgenetic choriocarcinoma with concurrent intrauterine placenta might be from either dispermic twin gestation (mole and coexistent nonmolar fetus) or an antecedent molar pregnancy. Choriocarcinoma shortly postpartum might not be associated with the last placenta. STR analysis can be useful in distinguishing gestational choriocarcinoma from non-gestational, as well as the causative pregnancy, and serve as a helpful examination tool for guiding clinical management.