BACKGROUND: Contemporary 24-h movement behavior (24-HMB) guidelines provide recommendations on time spent on physical activity (PA), screen time (ST), and sleep (SL). There is evidence of physiological and psychological health benefits associated with meeting such guidelines. However, the prevalence of meeting 24-HMB guidelines among youth prescribed eyeglasses/contact lenses is less clear. The primary purpose of this cross-sectional analysis was to examine the prevalence of partially or fully meeting 24-HMB guidelines in U.S. youth prescribed eyeglasses/contact lenses, and variations in meeting the guidelines by demographic, health status, and environmental attributes.
METHODS: Data from the 2021 National Survey of Children\'s Health (NSCH) yielded a target subpopulation of 8523 youth aged 6-17 years (54.22 % girls) prescribed eyeglasses/contact lenses. The representative sample of US children and adolescents was used to estimate the prevalence of meeting 24-HMB guidelines, and a multinomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the odds of meeting 24-HMB guidelines by demographic, health status, and environmental variables.
RESULTS: Overall, only 6.57 % met all three 24-HMB guidelines, 23.74 % did not meet any of the three 24-HMB guidelines, and 3.57 %, 10.88 %, and 29.98 % met single guidelines for physical activity, screen time, or sleep duration, respectively, while 25.27 % met any of two 24-HMB guidelines. Female participants were less likely to meet PA + SL guidelines (OR = 0.57, 95 % CI [0.38, 0.56]) but more likely to meet ST + SL guidelines (OR = 1.52, 95 % CI [1.20, 1.91]). Hispanic participants were less likely to meet PA + ST (OR = 0.28, 95 % CI [0.14, 0.52]) guidelines and all three guidelines (OR = 0.41, 95 % CI [0.23, 0.71]) while participants identified as black (OR = 0.33, 95 % CI [0.21, 0.51]) were significantly less likely to meet ST + SL guidelines. With respect to health status, overweight status, repeated/chronic physical pain, and born premature, were detrimentally associated with meeting two or more 24-HMB guidelines. Living in neighborhoods with parks or playgrounds and neighborhood safety were positively linked to meeting the guidelines while living in neighborhoods with sidewalks or walking paths was negatively linked to meeting PA + ST guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: In U.S. youth prescribed eyeglasses/contact lenses the prevalence of meeting all three 24-HMB guidelines was low, especially the low prevalence observed in female participants, Hispanic and black participants, participants with overweight status, repeated/chronic pain, born premature, living in neighborhoods with sidewalks. Policy makers should take initiative to promote integrated guidelines among this special age group for health benefits.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the one-year efficacy of myopia prevention and control using three optical intervention methods - single vision lens (SVL), high aspherical lenticule (HAL), and orthokeratology (OK) lens - in children with low myopia.
METHODS: A cohort of 150 children aged 7-13 years with low myopia was recruited and divided into three groups: SVL (n = 50), HAL (n = 50), and OK lens group (n = 50), based on their preference for glasses. Follow-up assessments were carried out over one year, focusing on data from the right eye for statistical analysis. Baseline characteristics such as gender, age, axial length (AL), spherical equivalent refractive error (SER), flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), anterior chamber depth (ACD), white-to-white corneal diameter (WTW), and non-contact tonometry (NCT) measurements were gathered and compared among the three groups before any intervention. Changes in AL growth after 1 year of intervention were assessed across the three groups. Subsequently, the AL growth control rates between the HAL and OK lens groups were compared, with the SVL group serving as the reference standard.
RESULTS: The study found no statistically significant variances in baseline characteristics (gender, age, SER, AL, K1, K2, WTW, and NCT) among the SVL, HAL, and OK lens groups (all p > 0.05). Following a one-year intervention, AL growth rates were as follows: HAL group (0.163 ± 0.113 mm) < OK lens group (0.280 ± 0.170 mm) < SVL group (0.516 ± 0.190 mm), with statistically significant disparities (p < 0.05). The HAL group demonstrated a higher 1-year AL growth control rate (68.41%) compared to the OK lens group (45.74%) for children aged 7-13 with low myopia, with a statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). And there was significant difference in the SER change between SVL group and HAL group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to SVL, HAL and OK lens are more effective in controlling axial growth in mild myopia. Specifically, HAL maybe shows superior outcomes in both preventive and corrective measures, also it needs to be supported by more studies from randomized controlled experiments.

BACKGROUND: Myopia is increasing in prevalence worldwide. Combination therapy showed a better effect on myopia control than monotherapy. Repeated low-level red light therapy (RLRL) therapy and defocus-incorporated multiple segment (DIMS) spectacle lenses have been reported to retard myopia progression significantly. However, whether these two therapies are better than one is still unknown. The present study aims to report the study protocol of a trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of RLRL and DIMS versus DIMS alone for reducing the progression of myopia among Chinese school-aged children.
METHODS: This study is a 12-month, randomized, parallel-controlled, single-center clinical trial. We will recruit children aged 8-12 years with spherical equivalence (SE) between - 0.50 D and - 6.00 D under cycloplegia in both eyes. We will recruit 66 participants with an allocation ratio of 1:1 from our hospital. Participants in the intervention group will be treated with an RLRL therapy device twice a day from Monday to Friday at home, 3 min per session, with a minimum interval of 4 h, under the supervision of their parents/guardians. They will wear DIMS spectacles for myopia correction during the day. Participants in the control group will not receive the RLRL therapy and will only wear DIMS spectacles to correct myopia. Participants from both groups will attend the hospital every 6 months. The primary outcome is the change in axial length at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in refraction under cycloplegia, optical coherence tomography (OCT), multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG), color vision, and participants\' self-reporting of adverse events at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: This study will report the efficacy and safety outcome of the combination therapy of RLRL and DIMS versus DIMS for school-aged children with myopia in detail.
BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2300075398. Registered 4 September 2023. https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=200751 .

OBJECTIVE: To collate data on partially accommodative esotropia (PAET) to better understand this condition\'s aetiology and to evaluate and predict the therapeutic effect of a hyperopic correction on PAET.
METHODS: Eighty-nine consecutive patients diagnosed with PAET with a spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error >+2.50 D were included in this retrospective review. Clinical characteristics, including gender, age, SE, angle of esodeviation, accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio, near-distance disparity (NDD) and anatomical features of the rectus muscles were compared among different PAET subgroups. Multiple linear regression was used to identify independent factors that influenced the therapeutic effect of a hyperopic correction on esotropia.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed for the angle of esodeviation as a function of age in individuals with PAET. The incidence of SE in PAET participants >9 years old was significantly greater than in those <5 and 6-8 years of age. The therapeutic effect of hyperopic correction on esotropia was positively associated with SE both at distance and near. In addition, the limbus insertion distance (LID) of the lateral rectus (LR) muscle was positively associated with NDD at distance, but negatively associated at near.
CONCLUSIONS: A greater incidence of hyperopia was observed in older (>9 years old) PAET patients. A hyperopic correction had a greater effect on esotropia in individuals with a higher SE, larger LID of the LR muscle and a smaller NDD.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of individualized ocular refraction customized (IORC) spectacle lenses with different actual amounts of peripheral myopic defocus (MD) on myopia control over 1 year. These lenses compensate for the original peripheral refraction via the free-form surface on the back of the lens.
METHODS: This 1-year, double-masked randomised clinical trial included 184 myopic schoolchildren aged 8-12 years. Participants were randomised to receive IORC lenses with high (IORC-H group, +4.50 D), medium (IORC-M group, +3.50 D) or low (IORC-L group, +2.50 D) MD or single-vision (SV) lenses. The spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) and axial length (AL) were measured at baseline and 6-monthly intervals.
RESULTS: After 1 year, the mean (SD) changes in SER were -0.18 (0.37), -0.36 (0.37), -0.52 (0.39) and -0.60 (0.42) D for the IORC-H, IORC-M, IORC-L and SV groups, respectively. Compared with the SV group, the effects of slowing myopia progression were 70%, 40% and 13% for the IORC-H (difference of 0.47 D, p < 0.001), IORC-M (difference of 0.32 D, p = 0.001) and IORC-L (difference of 0.15 D, p > 0.05) groups, respectively. The mean (SD) changes in AL were 0.12 (0.16), 0.23 (0.17), 0.29 (0.17) and 0.36 (0.17) mm for the IORC-H, IORC-M, IORC-L and SV groups, respectively. The axial elongation was 67%, 36% and 19% lower in the IORC-H (difference of 0.25 mm, p < 0.001), IORC-M (difference of 0.15 mm, p < 0.001) and IORC-L (difference of 0.10 mm, p = 0.04) groups, respectively, compared with the SV group. The IORC-H group exhibited significantly less axial elongation than the IORC-M and IORC-L groups (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the IORC-M and IORC-L lenses, the IORC-H lens was found to have superior efficacy in inhibiting myopic progression and slowing eye growth in schoolchildren, with better myopia control efficacy in younger children.

UNASSIGNED: Individualized ocular refraction customization (IORC) lenses can be individually adjusted depending on the initial relative peripheral refraction to determine the myopic defocus (MD). We aimed to compare visual performance of children wearing IORC lenses with different amounts of MD to determine whether higher MD resulted in greater visual compromise.
UNASSIGNED: This study included 184 myopic children aged eight to 12 years, and 172 completed the trial. The participants were randomly assigned to wear IORC lenses with low (IORC-L, 2.50 D), medium (IORC-M, 3.50 D), or high (IORC-H, 4.50 D) MD or single-vision spectacle lenses (SVL). Distance and near best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity function (CSF) and questionnaires were evaluated at baseline and after six and 12 months.
UNASSIGNED: CSF over all frequencies and distance and near BCVA were not affected by lens design (all P > 0.05). The SVL group outperformed the three IORC lens groups in terms of ghosting images at baseline, and IORC-H and IORC-M groups outperformed IORC-L group (all P < 0.001); however, no differences were observed at the six- or 12-month visit. There were no significant differences among the four groups for any other subjective variables at any of the follow-up visits regarding vision clarity, vision stability, eyestrain, dizziness, headache, or overall vision satisfaction (all P > 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: The IORC lenses with an actual MD of 4.50 D provided acceptable objective and subjective visual performance and were well tolerated by children.
UNASSIGNED: IORC lenses with an actual MD of 4.50 D provided acceptable visual performance.

The increasing incidence of myopia has become a global public health concern. Exploring the mechanisms underlying the onset and progression of myopia is crucial for prevention and control. This paper reviews the role of peripheral retinal defocus mechanisms in the development of myopia, with particular emphasis on the interaction between accommodation lag and peripheral retinal defocus, as well as the impact of optical intervention on myopia control effectiveness. In recent years, researchers have developed various optical tools for myopia prevention and control based on the peripheral retinal defocus theory, such as peripheral defocus spectacle lenses, orthokeratology lenses, and peripheral defocus soft contact lenses. This paper aims to provide clinicians with the latest research findings to deepen their understanding of the mechanisms involved in myopia development and to guide the future development and clinical application of myopia prevention and control products.
随着近视眼发病率的不断攀升，其已成为全球性的公共卫生问题。探索近视眼的发生与进展机制对于防控至关重要。本文综述了周边视网膜离焦机制在近视发展中的作用，特别关注了调节滞后与周边视网膜离焦的相互作用，以及光学干预手段对近视眼控制效果的影响。近年来，基于周边视网膜离焦理论，研究者们开发了多种防控近视的光学工具，如周边离焦框架眼镜、角膜塑形镜和周边离焦软性角膜接触镜，本文也对这方面的进展进行了综述。本文旨在为临床医生提供最新的研究成果，加深对近视眼发生发展机制的理解，并指导未来防控近视眼产品的研发和临床应用。.

OBJECTIVE: Spectacle lenses with peripheral lenslets have shown promise for myopia control by providing peripheral myopic defocus signals. Here, we aimed to investigate the impact of prolonged exposure (>6 months) to peripheral myopic defocus on visual information processing in myopic children.
METHODS: The study included 30 myopic children who habitually wore spectacle lenses with highly aspherical lenslets (HAL group) and 34 children who habitually wore single-vision (SV group) spectacles. The quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) was used to measure contrast sensitivity (CS) under conditions of no or high noise. Both groups were tested with HAL and SV lenses. The perceptual template model was utilised to fit the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) and determine differences in information processing efficiency through internal additive noise ( N add ) and perceptual template gain (β).
RESULTS: The areas under the log CSF in the SV group were significantly higher than for the HAL group in both zero-noise conditions with the SV test lens (p = 0.03) and high-noise conditions with the HAL test lens (p = 0.02). For 2 cycle per degree (cpd) stimuli, β was significantly higher in the SV group with the HAL test lens than in the HAL group (p = 0.02), while there was a trend towards a significant difference in β for 6 cpd stimuli (p = 0.07). However, there were no significant differences in N add between the two groups, with or without noise interference.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduced CS observed in myopic children wearing HAL lenses for 6 months or more may be due to decreased β. This suggests that prolonged use of spectacle lenses with peripheral myopic defocus signals may compromise the central visual system\'s ability to process additional external noise, resulting in decreased efficiency in visual information processing.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between changes in accommodative and binocular function with myopia progression in myopic children over a two-year follow-up period, and to determine when changes in visual functions stabilized after switching from spectacles to orthokeratology (Ortho-K).
METHODS: This prospective, self-controlled study followed thirty-six participants (aged 8-14 years) for two years after they switched from spectacles to Ortho-K. Accommodative and binocular function were assessed prior to and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after commencing Ortho-K. Measurements included accommodative amplitude, accommodative response, accommodative facility, accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A), ocular alignment, positive relative accommodation (PRA), negative relative accommodation (NRA), horizontal vergence range, reading ability and stereoacuity. Myopia progression was quantified by the change in axial length.
RESULTS: Ocular alignment, monocular and binocular accommodative facility, and PRA stabilized after 1 month. The distance blur point in the convergence range, the distance break and recovery point in the divergence range, accommodative amplitude, calculated AC/A, stereoacuity and reading ability stabilized within 6 months. After two years of Ortho-K, NRA significantly increased (p = 0.044), while it showed no significant difference after one-year of lens wear (p = 0.49). The distance break point in the convergence range showed no significant difference (p = 0.20), but significantly decreased after one-year (p = 0.005). There were no significant correlations between the change in axial length with changes in accommodative or binocular function (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Accommodative and binocular function changed significantly after switching from spectacles to Ortho-K and most of the parameters stabilized within the first 6 months. There was no association between the change in accommodative or binocular function and myopia progression.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of myopia control in Chinese children, who had been wearing either orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses or myopia control spectacles (MCS) for one year.
METHODS: Relevant data were retrieved from 212 patients, with baseline myopia of -5.00 to -0.75 D, astigmatism ≤ 1.50 D, who had been undergoing myopia control treatment with either ortho-k (Euclid (OK1) or CRT (OK2)) or MCS (Stellest (MCS1) or DIMS (MCS2)) for at least one year. Myopia control effectiveness among the four groups was compared based on the change in spherical equivalent refraction (SER) (for the spectacle groups) and axial length (AL) (for all groups). Data retrieved, from the right eye only, included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), SER, and AL at both the initial clinic visit (baseline) and the one-year visit was analysed.
RESULTS: Although no significant differences in gender, cylindrical power, or BCVA were observed at the baseline visit (P > 0.05), there were significant differences in baseline age, myopia, and AL among the four groups (P < 0.05). No significant difference in axial elongation (AE) was found among the four groups after one year of treatment (P = 0.49). AE, adjusted for baseline age and spherical power, were 0.19 ± 0.15, 0.18 ± 0.14, 0.19 ± 0.19, 0.20 ± 0.18 mm for OK1, OK2, MCS1, MCS2, respectively. Only age was a significantly factor associated with AE and SER increase (P < 0.05), with negative associations between AE and age in all groups and positive association between SER increase and baseline age in the spectacle groups observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Both brands of ortho-k lenses and MCS had similar myopia control effectiveness for mild to moderate myopic children treated in a real-world setting in China. Average AE in one year ranged from 0.18 to 0.20 mm, comparable to previous reports on myopia control using ortho-k.