Community-based Participatory Research

基于社区的参与式研究
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于社区的参与式方法(CBPA)在提高干预效果方面已在全球范围内获得越来越多的认可。在中国社会中,这是相对较新的,参与者的看法还没有得到充分的探索。本研究旨在探讨受虐待的中国女性对CBPA计划在满足其需求方面的看法。
    总共招募了11名受虐待的中国女性参加焦点小组和个人访谈。使用了半结构化面试指南。所有访谈都是录音的,数据是逐字转录的。使用常规内容分析法进行分析。
    确定了关于妇女对社区参与性方法方案的看法和经验的四个主题:(1)妇女对CBPA方案的可接受性;(2)妇女对CBPA方案的有用性;(3)妇女对CBPA方案的可行性的感知;(4)通过参与CBPA赋予妇女权力。
    受虐待的中国妇女对社区参与式方法有很高的认可度和积极的经验。妇女受益于她们在整个过程中的积极参与。研究结果证实了在设计干预措施时使用基于社区的参与方法的潜力,以进行未来的计划规划和干预,以满足受虐待的中国妇女的需求。
    UNASSIGNED: The community-based participatory approach (CBPA) has gained increasing recognition worldwide for enhancing the effectiveness of intervention. It is relatively new in Chinese societies and participants\' perceptions are underexplored. This study aims to explore abused Chinese women\'s perceptions on the CBPA programme in addressing their needs.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 11 abused Chinese women were recruited for a focus group and individual interviews. A semi-structured interview guide was used. All interviews were audio-recorded and data were transcribed verbatim. Conventional content analysis was used for analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Four themes were identified regarding the women\'s perceptions and experiences of the community-based participatory approach programme: (1) Women\'s perceived acceptability of the CBPA programme; (2) Women\'s perceived usefulness of the CBPA programme; (3) Women\'s perceived feasibility of the CBPA programme; and (4) Empowering the women through participating in CBPA.
    UNASSIGNED: Abused Chinese women had high perceived acceptance and positive experiences towards the community-based participatory approach. Women benefited from their robust participation throughout the process. The findings confirm the potential of using the community-based participatory approach in designing interventions for future programme planning and intervention to address the needs of abused Chinese women.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社区参与在全球免疫策略中占主导地位,能够消除疫苗接种犹豫并提高疫苗接种信心。尽管大力支持社区参与促进健康,社区参与疫苗接种推广的证据出现在质量不确定的片段中。
    目的:本综述旨在系统研究不同内容和程度的社区参与对提高疫苗接种率的有效性。
    方法:本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目进行。在四个英语数据库中进行了全面而详尽的文献检索(PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,和CochraneLibrary)和两个中文数据库(CNKI和万方),以查找所有可能的文章。具有实验研究设计的原始研究文章检查了社区参与疫苗接种促进的有效性。两名审稿人独立进行文献检索,研究选择,质量评估和数据提取。通过讨论解决了差异,在必要时由第三审稿人仲裁。
    结果:在2006年至2021年期间的11,404条记录中,总共检索了20篇文章,作为样本集,以量化社区参与疫苗接种促进的有效性。这些包括的研究以各种设计进行,12个使用单组研究前设计,5项使用集群随机对照试验,3项使用非随机对照试验。其中包括针对多种疫苗的研究,8项研究侧重于儿童免疫接种,8项研究集中在HPV疫苗上,3研究集中在乙肝疫苗,1项研究集中在COVID-19疫苗上。荟萃分析报告了在前后比较((率差异)RD:0.34;95%CI:0.21-0.47)和组间比较(RD:0.18;95%CI:0.07-0.29)中疫苗接种率均显着增加。关于社区参与内容的荟萃分析发现,参与者招募产生的效应大小最大(RD:0.51;95%CI:0.37-0.67;I2=99.5%)。其次是干预发展(RD:0.36;95%CI:0.23-0.50;I2=99.7%),干预实施(RD:0.35;95%CI:0.22-0.47;I2=99.8%),和数据收集(RD:0.34;95%CI:0.19-0.50;I2=99.8%)。关于社区参与程度的荟萃分析发现,高社区参与程度产生的效应大小最大(RD:0.49;95%CI:0.17-0.82;I2=99.5%)。其次是中等社区参与度(RD:0.45;95%CI:0.33-0.58;I2=99.4%),社区参与程度低(RD:0.15;95%CI:0.05-0.25;I2=98.6%)。关于干预策略类型的荟萃分析发现,“卫生服务支持”认可了最大的效应大小(RD:0.45;95%CI:0.25-0.65;I2=99.9%),其次是“健康教育和讨论”(RD:0.39;95%CI:0.20-0.58;I2=99.7%),“随访和提醒”(RD:0.33;95%CI:0.23-0.42;I2=99.3%),和“社会营销活动(SMC)和社区动员(CM)”(RD:0.24;95%CI:0.06-0.41;I2=99.9%)。
    结论:这项荟萃分析的结果支持社区参与疫苗接种促进的有效性,但参与内容和程度不同。社区参与需要“适合目的”的方法,而不是“一刀切”的方法,以最大限度地提高疫苗推广的有效性。
    背景:该审查协议已在PROSPERO数据库(CRD42022339081)中注册。
    BACKGROUND: Community engagement plays a vital role in global immunization strategies, offering the potential to overcome vaccination hesitancy and enhance vaccination confidence. Although there is significant backing for community engagement in health promotion, the evidence supporting its effectiveness in vaccination promotion is fragmented and of uncertain quality.
    OBJECTIVE: This review aims to systematically examine the effectiveness of different contents and extent of community engagement for promoting vaccination rates.
    METHODS: This study was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A comprehensive and exhaustive literature search was performed in 4 English databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) and 2 Chinese databases (CNKI and Wan Fang) to identify all possible articles. Original research articles applying an experimental study design that investigated the effectiveness of community engagement in vaccination promotion were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently performed the literature search, study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion, with the arbitration of a third reviewer where necessary.
    RESULTS: A total of 20 articles out of 11,404 records from 2006 to 2021 were retrieved. The studies used various designs: 12 applied single-group pre-post study designs, 5 were cluster randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 3 were non-RCTs. These studies targeted multiple vaccines, with 8 focusing on children\'s immunization, 8 on human papillomavirus vaccine, 3 on hepatitis B virus vaccine, and 1 on COVID-19 vaccine. The meta-analysis revealed significant increases in vaccination rates both in pre-post comparison (rate difference [RD] 0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.47, I2=99.9%, P<.001) and between-group comparison (RD 0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.29, I2=98.4%, P<.001). The meta-analysis revealed that participant recruitment had the largest effect size (RD 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.67, I2=99.9%, P<.001), followed by intervention development (RD 0.36, 95% CI 0.23-0.50, I2=100.0%, P<.001), intervention implementation (RD 0.35, 95% CI 0.22-0.47, I2=99.8%, P<.001), and data collection (RD 0.34, 95% CI 0.19-0.50, I2=99.8%, P<.001). The meta-analysis indicated that high community engagement extent yielded the largest effect size (RD 0.49, 95% CI 0.17-0.82, I2=100.0%, P<.001), followed by moderate community engagement extent (RD 0.45, 95% CI 0.33-0.58, I2=99.6%, P<.001) and low community engagement extent (RD 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.25, I2=99.2%, P<.001). The meta-analysis revealed that \"health service support\" demonstrated the largest effect sizes (RD 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.65, I2=99.9%, P<.001), followed by \"health education and discussion\" (RD 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.58, I2=99.7%, P<.001), \"follow-up and reminder\" (RD 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.42, I2=99.3%, P<.001), and \"social marketing campaigns and community mobilization\" (RD 0.24, 95% CI 0.06-0.41, I2=99.9%, P<.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis supported the effectiveness of community engagement in vaccination promotion with variations in terms of engagement contents and extent. Community engagement required a \"fit-for-purpose\" approach rather than a \"one-size-fits-all\" approach to maximize the effectiveness of vaccine promotion.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42022339081; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=339081.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:虽然促进积极老龄化的社区层面干预措施受到越来越多的关注,并且有一种趋势是利用技术支持传统的身体或社会干预措施,设计这些整体干预措施的实践指导很少。本研究旨在研究以社区参与式研究(CBPR)原则为指导的文献中报告的干预措施。目标是提取见解,为共同设计积极老龄化综合干预措施的未来实践提供信息。
    方法:系统评价侧重于社区层面的干预措施,促进积极老龄化,社会,和数字元素,即,综合干预措施。遵循系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。根据CBPR原则对纳入的干预措施进行了归纳分析。
    结果:共纳入13项研究,在八个类别下产生了24个设计考虑。进一步的思考确定了这些设计考虑因素的相互关联的性质,并指出了当前研究中的差距。这项研究强调了分享招聘方法和资源分配细节的紧迫性和重要性,记录和报告协作细节,并向学术界以外的利益相关者传播研究结果。
    结论:这项研究为研究人员和从业者开发社区层面的积极老龄化综合干预措施提供了有价值的见解和实践指导。这些发现也是在社区一级共同设计积极老龄化综合干预措施方面积累知识和实践的起点。下一个关键阶段涉及在实际案例中评估这些设计考虑因素,以评估其适用性并确定潜在的改进领域。
    BACKGROUND: While community-level interventions for promoting active ageing have received increasing attention and there is a trend to leverage technology to support traditional physical or social interventions, little hands-on guidance exists for designing these integral interventions. This study aimed to examine the interventions reported in the literature guided by Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) principles. The goal is to extract insights that inform future practices in co-designing integral interventions for active ageing.
    METHODS: The systematic review focused on community-level interventions promoting active ageing that integrated physical, social, and digital elements, i.e., integral interventions. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The included interventions were analysed abductively based on the CBPR principles.
    RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included, and 24 design considerations were generated under eight categories. Further reflection identified the interrelated nature of these design considerations and pinpointed the gaps in current research. This study highlights the urgency and importance of sharing recruitment methods and resource allocation details, recording and reporting collaboration specifics, and disseminating findings to stakeholders beyond academia.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study offers valuable insights and practical guidance to researchers and practitioners developing community-level integral interventions for active ageing. The findings also serve as a starting point for accumulating knowledge and practice in co-designing integral interventions for active ageing at the community level. The next crucial phase involves evaluating these design considerations within real-world cases to assess their applicability and identify potential areas for improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:毛利人(土著人民)和非毛利人在老龄化结果方面存在显著的不平等。这项研究使用了一种基于优势的方法,该方法基于法力motuhake(自治和自我实现)的关键文化概念,开发了tuakana-teina(实际上是年长的兄弟姐妹-年轻的兄弟姐妹)同伴教育计划,以帮助kaumātua(长者)解决健康和社会需求。这项研究的目的是测试对接受该计划的人的影响。三个目标确定了对结果的影响,收到的资源和方案的成本效益。
    方法:五个Kaupapa毛利人(由毛利人世界观指导的研究和服务)iwi(部落)和社区提供者使用伙伴关系方法实施了该项目。Tuakana(同伴教育者)进行了多达六个对话,每个对话最多有六个teina(同伴学习者),并分享了与社会和卫生服务有关的信息。前测和后测,集群交错设计是研究设计。参与者完成了符合毛利人世界观的健康和法力运动措施的基线和方案后评估。关于评估的不限成员名额问题,五个焦点小组,四个单独访谈用于定性评估。
    结果:总共招募了113个kaumātua,86完成了该计划。分析显示,与健康相关的生活质量有所改善,需要更多的日常任务的帮助,生活满意度,支付账单和住房问题。定性结果通过提供无形和有形资源,支持了该计划对法力motuhake和hauora(整体健康)的影响。成本-效果分析表明,干预措施具有成本效益,每个QALY的成本低于人均GDP三倍的传统门槛。
    结论:文化共鸣,通过参与式方法制定的基于优势的方案可以以具有成本效益的方式显著改善健康和社会成果。
    背景:临床试验登记:试验登记:(ACTRN12620000316909)。提前注册2020年6月3日,https://www。anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379302&isClinicalTrial=False。
    BACKGROUND: There are significant inequities between Māori (Indigenous people) and non-Māori in ageing outcomes. This study used a strengths-based approach based on the key cultural concept of mana motuhake (autonomy and self-actualisation) to develop a tuakana-teina (literally older sibling-younger sibling) peer education programme to assist kaumātua (elders) in addressing health and social needs. The purpose of this study was to test the impact on those receiving the programme. Three aims identify the impact on outcomes, resources received and the cost effectiveness of the programme.
    METHODS: Five Kaupapa Māori (research and services guided by Māori worldviews) iwi (tribe) and community providers implemented the project using a partnership approach. Tuakana (peer educators) had up to six conversations each with up to six teina (peer learners) and shared information related to social and health services. A pre- and post-test, clustered staggered design was the research design. Participants completed a baseline and post-programme assessment of health and mana motuhake measures consistent with Māori worldviews. Open-ended questions on the assessments, five focus groups, and four individual interviews were used for qualitative evaluation.
    RESULTS: A total of 113 kaumātua were recruited, and 86 completed the programme. The analysis revealed improvements in health-related quality of life, needing more help with daily tasks, life satisfaction, paying bills and housing problems. Qualitative results supported impacts of the programme on mana motuhake and hauora (holistic health) through providing intangible and tangible resources. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the intervention is cost effective, with a cost per QALY of less than the conventional threshold of three times GDP per capita.
    CONCLUSIONS: A culturally-resonant, strengths-based programme developed through a participatory approach can significantly improve health and social outcomes in a cost-effective way.
    BACKGROUND: Clinical trial registry: Trial registration: (ACTRN12620000316909). Prospectively registered 06/03/2020, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379302&isClinicalTrial=False .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨目标达成程度分级(GAS)在评估体弱多病老年人干预措施中的有效性。此外,这项研究旨在解释GAS目标是如何根据国际功能分类建立的,残疾和健康(ICF)类别,包括身体功能,活动和参与以及环境因素。
    方法:在本研究中,随机选择220名虚弱的老年人参加对照试验。干预组每周进行三次多组分锻炼,一次在社区卫生服务地点,两次在家。对照组接受了有关体育锻炼的建议,但没有监督锻炼。两组参与者通过焦点小组讨论,从基于ICF制定的23个目标中选择了个性化的GAS目标。该研究使用广义估计方程来分析组间的差异。
    结果:该研究包括144名参与者,运动组72,对照组72。所有参与者的前三个个性化目标是前庭功能(53.5%),疼痛管理(43.1%)和举起和搬运物品(31.9%)。两组在干预的第8周和第24周,GAS评分均显着增加(p<0.05),但运动组表现出更显著的改善(p<0.05)。独居的参与者干预后GAS评分改善较低。相比之下,使用智能手机的参与者在干预后可能获得更高的GAS评分改善.
    结论:GAS可以成为制定和评估身体机能中个性化和有意义的目标的有价值的工具,活动和参与以及环境因素。多组分运动干预措施可以帮助虚弱的老年人实现GAS测量的预期目标。
    This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) in assessing an intervention for pre-frail senior citizens. Additionally, the study aimed to explain how the GAS goals were established based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories, including body function, activity and participation and environmental factors.
    In this study, 220 pre-frail older adults were randomly selected to participate in a controlled trial. The intervention group engaged in multicomponent exercise three times a week, once at a community health service location and twice at home. The control group received advice on physical activity but did not have supervised exercise. Participants in both groups selected individualised GAS goals from 23 goals developed based on ICF by focus group discussion. The study used generalised estimating equations to analyse the differences between the groups.
    The study included 144 participants, 72 in the exercise group and 72 in the control group. The top three individualised goals for all participants were vestibular functions (53.5%), pain management (43.1%) and lifting and carrying objects (31.9%). Both groups saw a significant increase in GAS scores at week 8 and week 24 of the intervention (p<0.05), but the exercise group showed a more significant improvement (p<0.05). The participants living alone were associated with lower postintervention improvements in the GAS scores. In contrast, the participants who were using a smartphone were likely to get higher postintervention improvements in the GAS scores.
    GAS can be a valuable tool for setting and evaluating individualised and meaningful goals in body functions, activity and participation and environmental factors. The multicomponent exercise interventions can help pre-frail older adults achieve their expected goals as measured by the GAS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与普通人群相比,出院的精神病患者由于生活中的各种危险因素而自杀的风险更高。然而,这些患者出院后的具体问题和需求仍不清楚.这项研究构成了更广泛的实施研究的一部分,旨在制定针对中国精神病患者出院后自杀的干预策略。本研究旨在从患者的角度定性地调查问题和需求,他们的非专业医疗保健支持者(LHS),和精神卫生专业人员(MP),旨在提高介入策略的疗效。
    方法:本研究是基于深圳康宁医院(SKH)的更大实施研究的一部分,广东,中国。在基于社区的参与式研究框架下,我们招募了出院的精神病患者,他们的LHS,议员们作为一个协作的社区团队,我们对患者和LSHs进行了个人深入访谈,并对国会议员进行了焦点小组访谈.我们利用主题分析方法通过系统地编码和分析数据来识别访谈中的子主题和主题。
    结果:共招募了45名参与者进行访谈,包括17名患者,8个LHS,20个议员我们进行了25次个人深度访谈和3次焦点小组访谈。通过采访,我们确定了出院后问题的三个主题:与自我有关的问题,家庭问题,社会和社区相关问题。我们还确定了与减少出院后自杀有关的四个主题:积极的自我管理,多功能亲戚,多功能MP组,一个温暖的社会。强烈强调了LHS的切实支持和国会议员的情感支持。后续干预措施被认为是解决这些未满足需求的最重要方法。社区的工具支持以及对精神障碍患者的关怀和非歧视性环境对于降低自杀风险至关重要。
    结论:建立一个连接精神病患者的综合精神卫生保健服务网络,LHS,国会议员跨越社区和社会部门,以患者为中心的后续护理为核心,是更好地满足患者需求和减少出院后自杀的实用方法。
    背景:注册号:NCT04907669。注册日期:5月26日,2021年。
    Discharged psychiatric patients are at higher risk of suicide due to various risk factors in their lives compared to the general population. However, specific problems and needs of these patients after discharge remain unclear. This research constitutes a segment of a broader implementation study designed to formulate an interventional strategy targeting post-discharge suicide among Chinese psychiatric patients. The present study seeks to qualitatively investigate the problems and needs from the perspectives of patients, their lay healthcare supporters (LHSs), and mental health professionals (MPs), aiming to enhance the efficacy of the interventional strategy.
    This study is part of a larger implementation study based on Shenzhen Kangning Hospital (SKH) in Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. Under the community-based participatory research framework, we recruited discharged psychiatric patients, their LHSs, and MPs as a collaborative community team, and we conducted individual in-depth interviews for patients and LSHs and focus group interviews with MPs. We utilized a thematic analysis approach to identify sub-themes and themes from interviews through systematically coding and analyzing the data.
    A total of 45 participants were recruited for interviews, comprising 17 patients, 8 LHSs, and 20 MPs. We conducted 25 individual in-depth interviews and 3 focus group interviews. Through the interviews, we identified three themes of post-discharge problems: problems related to self, family-related problems, societal and community-related problems. We also identified four themes related to reducing post-discharge suicide: proactive self-management, multifunctional relatives, multifunctional MP group, and a warm society. The tangible support from LHSs and emotional support from MPs are strongly emphasized. Follow-up interventions were identified as the most significant way to addressing these unmet needs. Instrumental support from the community and a caring and non-discriminatory environment for individuals with mental disorders are essential for reducing suicide risk.
    Establishing an integrated mental health care service network that connects psychiatric patients, LHSs, and MPs cross community and societal sectors, with patient-centered follow-up care at its core, is a practical approach to better address patients\' needs and reduce post-discharge suicide.
    Registration number: NCT04907669. Date of registration: May 26th,2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    参与社区成员作为同行研究人员的受欢迎程度正在增长。涉及老年人的现有参与性研究似乎存在两个主要问题。首先,老年人很少被定位为公平的研究伙伴。第二,能力建设和老年人真实的外行观点之间可能存在矛盾。本文采用了知识匹配的参与式方法来解决这两个问题。七名老年人和四名法律系学生接受了同行研究人员的培训,与两名学术研究人员一起参与一个关于退休后财务福利的项目。本文记录了研究过程,反映了研究的好处,挑战,以及与这种方法相关的最佳实践,通过分析三次反思会议的笔录,书面反思,以及使用主题分析方法的所有同行和学术研究人员的现场笔记。结果概述了学术研究人员和同行研究人员使用知识匹配的参与式研究的经验和思考,以及研究过程和结果。扩展方法振幅的优点,利用老年人的能力,伙伴关系匹配,和赋权表现在知识匹配的参与式方法上。建立能力建设,伙伴关系发展,议程的灵活性是成功的基本要素。我们进一步讨论了权力差距,伙伴关系冲突,和道德困境。研究人员和从业者可以利用这些发现,方法论方法,以及在他们的研究中吸取的教训,旨在让老年人在以后的生活中改善健康和社会福祉。
    The popularity of engaging community members as peer researchers is growing. The existing participatory research involving older adults appears to suffer from two main issues. First, older adults are rarely positioned as equitable research partners. Second, a paradox may exist between capacity building and an authentic lay perspective of older adults. This article adopted a knowledge-matching participatory approach to address these two issues. Seven older adults and four law students were trained as peer researchers to work with two academic researchers on a project about financial well-being in retirement. This article documented the research process and reflected the benefits, challenges, and best practices associated with this approach by analyzing transcripts from three reflective meetings, written reflections, and field notes from all peer and academic researchers using a thematic analysis approach. Results outline the experiences and reflections of using knowledge-matching participatory research for academic researchers and peer researchers, as well as for research processes and outcomes. The advantages of extending methodological amplitude, leveraging older adults\' capacity, partnership matching, and empowerment are shown by the knowledge-matching participatory methodology. The establishment of capacity building, partnership development, and agenda flexibility are essential elements of success. We further discussed power disparity, partnership conflicts, and ethical dilemmas. Researchers and practitioners can utilize the findings, methodological approaches, and lessons learned in their studies aiming at engaging older adults in improving health and social well-being in later life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估在广州COVID-19部分封锁期间,基于夫妻的干预措施对社区居住的2型糖尿病老年人的管理行为和心理健康的影响。在参与先前随机对照试验的207名参与者中(试验编号:ChiCTR1900027137),156人(75%)完成了COVID-19调查。使用随机截取模型,通过跨截面和纵向比较了基于夫妻的干预组和仅限患者的对照组之间的管理行为和抑郁症状的性别差异。跨领域,与对照组相比,干预组女性患者的积极行为改变评分更多(β=1.53,p=0.002),抑郁症状更少(β=-1.34,p=0.02).随着时间的推移,与干预组相比,女性患者生活在高风险区域(&lt;5km)附近,并表现出抑郁症状减少(β=-4.48,p=0.008)。对照组。男性的组间差异无统计学意义。女性往往比男性从基于耦合的干预中受益更多,尤其是在这些更接近高风险地区的地区。积极的配偶参与可以更好地维持慢性病管理。
    This study aimed to evaluate the gender-specific effect of a couple-based intervention on the management behaviors and mental well-being of community-dwelling older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 partial lockdown in Guangzhou. Out of 207 participants involved in a prior randomized controlled trial (Trial no. ChiCTR1900027137), 156 (75%) completed the COVID-19 survey. Gendered differences in management behaviors and depressive symptoms between the couple-based intervention group and the patient-only control group were compared by distance to the high-risk areas cross-sectionally and longitudinally using random intercept models. Cross-sectionally, female patients of the intervention group had more positive behavior change scores (β = 1.53, p = 0.002) and fewer depressive symptoms (β = −1.34, p = 0.02) than the control group. Over time, female patients lived closer to the high-risk areas (<5 km) and showed decreasing depressive symptoms (β = −4.48, p = 0.008) in the intervention group vs. the control group. No statistically significant between-group difference was found for males. Females tended to benefit more from the coupled-based intervention than males did, particularly among these closer to the high-risk areas. Chronic disease management can be better sustained with active spousal engagement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    躺下的卫生工作者,尽管他们缺乏正式的培训,是向社区有糖尿病风险的人提供无障碍护理的重要合作伙伴。虽然糖尿病前期和糖尿病在社会经济地位低的人群中更为普遍,包括那些住在不足的房子里的人。然而,由于经济和社会上的不利因素,这些人口通常在获得正规护理服务方面存在问题。在高收入国家,发达的中国社会,这项务实的随机对照试验旨在调查6个月的外行卫生工作者干预在居住在香港细分公寓的人群中糖尿病管理中的效果.
    在这次审判中,222名居住在房屋不足且有糖尿病风险的中国主要照顾者将通过非营利组织招募,这些非营利组织服务于平均家庭收入较低的地区和香港普遍存在的细分公寓。采用6个月的等待名单控制,参与者将随机接受为期6个月的5个组成部分的非专业卫生工作者干预,包括(1)非专业卫生工作者培训和支持;(2)卫生专业培训;(3)针对家庭的健康和营养需求制定有针对性的护理计划;(4)病例管理办法;(5)非专业卫生工作者的财政补贴,以维持这种做法。对照组将接受有关糖尿病风险管理的常规护理和健康信息。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和空腹血糖将在本试验的进入和退出评估时作为主要结果。
    我们的随机对照试验是第一个调查非专业卫生工作者干预对居住在住房不足的中国低收入人群糖尿病前期管理的影响的试验之一。这项研究可以提供见解,以考虑社区中糖尿病风险人群的替代服务提供模式,通过提供由社区卫生工作者支持的护理选择和加强护理提供者的社区参与。本研究试图使用混合方法研究设计来评估非专业卫生工作者干预的影响。尽管做出了贡献,这项研究可能会受到抽样偏倚的影响,因为所有参与者都将从为贫困人群服务的非营利组织招募.
    ChiCTR2100052080在中国临床试验注册。URL:https://www.chictr.org.cn/edit。aspx?pid=134928&htm=4。
    Lay health workers, despite their lack of formal trainings, are important partners in providing accessible care to people with risk to develop diabetes in the community. While pre-diabetes and diabetes are more prevalent among people with low socio-economic status, including those living in inadequate houses. However, this population often have accessibility problems to formal care services due to their financial and social disadvantages. In a high-income, developed Chinese society, this pragmatic randomized controlled trial seeks to investigate the effect of a 6-months lay health worker intervention in diabetes management among people living in sub-divided flats units in Hong Kong.
    In this trial, 222 Chinese primary caregivers living in inadequate houses and with diabetes risk will be recruited via non-profit organizations serving in districts with low average household incomes and prevalent subdivided flats in Hong Kong. Adopting a 6 months wait-list control, participants will be randomized to receive a 6-months lay health worker intervention of 5 components, including (1) lay health worker training and support; (2) health professional training; (3) formulation of a targeted care plan for the health and nutritional needs of the families; (4) case management approach; and (5) financial subsidy for lay health workers to sustain the practice. The control group will receive usual care and health information on diabetes risk management. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting blood glucose will be taken at the entry and exit assessment of this trial as primary outcomes.
    Our randomized controlled trial is one of the first to investigate the effect of lay health worker intervention on pre-diabetes management in a low-income Chinese population residing in inadequate houses. This study could provide insights to consider alternative service provision models to people living with diabetes risk in the community, by providing a care option to be supported by community health workers and enhanced community participation of care providers. This study attempts to evaluate the impact of a lay health worker intervention using a mixed-method study design. Despite its contribution, this study might be subjected to sampling bias since all the participants will be recruited from non-profit organizations serving deprived populations.
    ChiCTR2100052080 in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=134928&htm=4.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然存在一些针对COVID-19的人群预防措施,有助于减少病毒在社区中的传播,预防工作仍有许多领域需要改进或完善,特别是随着新的病毒株的发展。目前的一些关键问题包括不正确和/或不一致地使用口罩,对COVID-19的早期筛查或疫苗接种的接受度低,疫苗犹豫,和错误信息。在一些弱势群体中尤其如此,比如患有慢性病的老年人,可能不会说主流语言的少数民族和儿童。当前的协议通过五项相互关联的研究引入了一项大型研究计划,这些研究都侧重于社会和行为干预措施,以改善与社区有关的预防指标的不同方面。因此,总体方案的具体目标是(1)增加COVID-19的早期检测,促进社区采用COVID-19疫苗(研究1);(2)提高与COVID-19相关的健康知识和疫苗知识,并促进少数民族群体改进预防措施,慢性病人群和护理人员(研究2);(3)增强公众呆在家里的动机,避免不必要的高风险活动(研究3);(4)减少COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫(研究4);(5)提高对COVID-19相关卫生习惯的依从性,并在学童中接受早期检测(研究5)。
    我们将在拟议的研究中使用基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)方法。所有研究都将与主要的社区利益相关者一起纳入干预开发阶段,可行性研究和执行阶段。将使用各种自我报告和基于目标的措施来评估各种结果,根据每一项研究的重点,在短期和长期,包括,例如,8项自我报告的电子健康素养量表(eHEAL)和疫苗摄取等客观指标。
    理论驱动的干预措施将解决每个研究的重点(例如,社交距离,促进疫苗摄取,eHealth教育,预防措施和早期发现)。预计弱势群体和高风险群体的结果会有所改善。由于预防行为的改善和疫苗摄取的增加,预计感染率会降低。该方法的长期可持续性将通过CBPR模式实现。该协议的发布不仅可以帮助共享大规模和复杂的基于社区的设计,但也会让所有人从中吸取教训,因此,我们将在未来更好地了解共享研究设计是否可以引发及时的研究计划。
    While a number of population preventive measures for COVID-19 exist that help to decrease the spread of the virus in the community, there are still many areas in preventative efforts that need improvement or refinement, particularly as new strains of the virus develop. Some of the key issues currently include incorrect and/or inconsistent use of face masks, low acceptance of early screening or vaccination for COVID-19, vaccine hesitance, and misinformation. This is particularly the case in some vulnerable populations, such as older people with chronic illnesses, ethnic minorities who may not speak the mainstream language well and children. The current protocol introduces a large programme of research through five interrelated studies that all focus on social and behavioural interventions to improve different aspects of community-related preventative indicators. Hence, the specific objectives of the overall programme are to (1) increase early testing for COVID-19 and promote the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in the community (Study 1); (2) increase COVID-19-related health literacy and vaccine literacy and promote improved preventative measures in minority ethnic groups, chronically ill populations and caregivers (Study 2); (3) strengthen the public\'s motivation to stay at home and avoid nonessential high-risk activities (Study 3); (4) decrease COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (Study 4); and (5) enhance the adherence to COVID-19-related hygiene practices and the uptake of early testing in school children (Study 5).
    We will utilise a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach in the proposed studies. All studies will incorporate an intervention development phase in conjunction with key community stakeholders, a feasibility study and an execution stage. A variety of self-reported and objective-based measures will be used to assess various outcomes, based on the focus of each study, in both the short- and long-term, including, for example, the 8-item self-reported eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEAL) and objective measures such as vaccine uptake.
    Theory-driven interventions will address each study\'s focus (e.g., social distancing, promotion of vaccine uptake, eHealth education, preventive measures and early detection). Improvements are expected to be seen in the outcomes of vulnerable and high-risk groups. Decreased infection rates are expected due to improved preventative behaviours and increased vaccine uptake. Long-term sustainability of the approach will be achieved through the CBPR model. The publication of this protocol can assist not only in sharing a large-scale and complex community-based design, but will also allow all to learn from this, so that we will have better insight in the future whether sharing of study designs can elicit timely research initiatives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号