Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a collection of genetic disorders caused by abnormalities in collagen and typified by hyperflexible joints, hyperextensible skin, and a tendency for easy bruising and tissue injuries. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS), the most common subtype, presents a diagnostic challenge due to the lack of specific genetic markers. This case report describes a 13-year-old girl with hEDS, presenting with hypermobility, thoracolumbar scoliosis, constipation, glucosuria, microscopic hematuria, urticaria, and intermittent episodes of bilateral hand and feet swelling. Genetic testing revealed a variant of uncertain significance in the COL9A2 gene. An echocardiogram showed a mildly dilated aortic root. The complexity of her presentation underscores the challenges in diagnosing and managing hEDS with multisystem involvement.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a young patient with scorpion sting (SS) with typical lesions of urticaria besides the local SS clinical picture.
METHODS: A systematic screening of articles dating from 1966 to 2021 was conducted in the main databases. All articles included the association between SS and urticaria. A new case report is added to the published list.
RESULTS: The literature search found 5 articles with 29 patients with SS and urticaria/allergic reactions. We performed our analysis by adding our present case, resulting in a total of 30 cases. Most were male, and their ages varied from 29 to 48 years. Regarding SS severity, most were mild or moderate. In two articles, patients had more than one sting. The allergic reaction varied from urticaria, pruritus, flushing, angioedema, wheezing, rhinorrhea, sneezing, consciousness alterations, and gastrointestinal and cardiovascular alterations. In 5/6 (83%) articles, the patients were alive at the study time. One subject died from anaphylactic shock.
CONCLUSIONS: The present article systematically reviewed all published cases of SS and allergic reactions to scorpion venom. It is an infrequent association; most patients are male and in the productive age, and reaction may vary from mild to severe, including death.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Amidst the emergence of new therapeutic options, traditional therapeutic plasmapheresis (TPE) used in diseases involving a toxic substance in the plasma, remains a viable alternative for cases of recalcitrant solar urticaria (SU). We emphasize the importance of documenting successful experience with repeated plasmapheresis to increase awareness amongst physicians and dermatologists regarding this effective treatment option.
UNASSIGNED: We reported a case of recalcitrant SU that had not responded to a combination of H1-antihistamines, immunosuppressants, omalizumab and intravenous immunoglobulin. We introduced serial TPE, which involved two consecutive days of procedures for each course was introduced. We detailed the regimen and highlighted the clinical and objective benefits observed with multiple treatments. Additionally, we compared this to other plasmapheresis regimens and their treatment responses previously reported for solar urticaria.
UNASSIGNED: Our patient underwent serial TPE, totaling 42 procedures over five years. Following the last TPE session, phototesting showed a sustained prolongation of minimal urticating doses (MUDS), which exceeded the maximum tested doses across nearly all ultraviolet (UV) and visible light ranges, with the exception of the two short ultraviolet B (UVB) wavelengths. MUDs increased to 25 from 6 mj/cm2 at 307.5± 5nm, and to 500 from 15 mj/cm2 at 320 ± 10nm, before the initial TPE. In our review, we included five articles covering eight SU patients who received TPE. Of these, the five patients with positive intradermal tests responded particularly well immediately after treatment. However, the condition relapsed within two weeks in one patient and within two months in another. In contrast, the other three patients with negative intradermal tests, showed no significant benefits from the treatment. No serious side effects from TPE were reported amongst the patients.
UNASSIGNED: This review underscores the efficacy of serial plasmapheresis procedures in treating refractory cases of SU, high3lighting the robust results observed.

Drug-induced urticaria and angioedema cases are typically reversible upon discontinuation and can be triggered by antibiotics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Piperacillin-tazobactam, a common broad-spectrum antimicrobial, has been linked to severe adverse reactions, such as thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, and Steven Johnson syndrome in some cases. A 35-year-old male presented to the emergency department with fever, cough, and acute breathlessness, complicating his ongoing treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis with bedaquiline and delamanid. He was admitted and received supportive care. On the third day of intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam, he developed drug-induced urticaria and angioedema, which resolved upon discontinuing the drug. Piperacillin/tazobactam-induced hypersensitivity reaction is an immunologic and IgE-mediated immediate reaction. IgE-mediated immediate reactions to three major phenotypes of allergic patients with confirmed to piperacillin/tazobactam are either (1) sensitized to the β-lactam ring or (2) sensitized to the lateral chain of aminopenicillins or (3) selective to piperacillin/tazobactam alone. A skin patch test is advised, or prescribed to avoid hypersensitivity reactions due to piperacillin/tazobactam. This case underscores the challenges of non-adherence to anti-tubercular therapy, leading to drug resistance and prolonged, costly, and sometimes intolerable treatments. Regular patient follow-up, counseling, monitoring, and healthcare provider involvement are essential to enhance treatment adherence. Adverse drug reactions must be promptly reported and managed, and patient-centric approaches are crucial. Digital patient records and standardized data collection are recommended for program evaluation and global policy development. Causality assessment for piperacillin-tazobactam was diagnosed as the probable cause of drug-induced urticaria and angioedema. This case highlights the importance of adherence to tuberculosis treatment to prevent drug resistance. Overall, patient-centered care, monitoring adverse events of drug added, and better data collection are crucial for successful tuberculosis management.

In rare instances, patients with SLE may exhibit atypical clinical manifestations, such as Hypocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis, which can pose diagnostic challenges. Here, we present a case report of a 28-year-old female with a history of SLE with lupus nephritis clase IV who developed HUV-like symptoms, ultimately leading to a diagnosis of C1q Vasculitis. This case underscores the importance of considering C1q Vasculitis in SLE patients presenting with HUV-like features and highlights Rituximab as a promising therapeutic option for managing this rare condition.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria presents with wheals and/or angioedema for >6 weeks without any specific triggers. The incidence of chronic spontaneous urticaria is increased in patients with comorbid autoimmune conditions. Here, we present a case of chronic spontaneous urticaria in a 9-year-old with type 1 diabetes and autoimmune thyroid disease who first presented with insulin pump site reactions concerning an insulin-related allergy. The patient was successfully treated with antihistamines and later immunosuppression with resumption of insulin pump therapy and remission of chronic spontaneous urticaria symptoms 18 months after onset.

In Japan, cutaneous adverse events (AEs) following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination have been frequently described; however, a larger case series and literature review are lacking. There is an urgent need for an extensive investigation of new cases and previous reports to provide a thorough body of information about post-COVID-19 immunization cutaneous AEs. We aimed to analyze patients with cutaneous AEs after COVID-19 vaccination in our hospital and review previous studies of cutaneous AEs. We analyzed post-COVID-19 vaccination cutaneous AEs in our department, the Japanese Registry, and previous literature. We enrolled 30 patients with cutaneous post-vaccination AEs in our department over 2 years (April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2023). We also confirmed cases registered in the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare COVID-19 vaccine side effect reporting system (February 17, 2021-March 12, 2023). A total of 587 records were retrieved and 93 articles were included for data extraction. A total of 28 non-injection-site cutaneous AEs and two injection-site AEs were identified. Six (20.0%) patients developed new-onset erythematous eruptions, and five (16.7%) patients developed urticaria. Pruritic eruption, eczema, shingles, and sweating symptoms have also been reported. In previous studies on non-injection-site cutaneous AEs, individuals who received the BNT162b2 vaccine were older than those who received mRNA-1273 (P < 0.01). Cutaneous AEs were mostly nonsignificant and self-limiting reactions; however, rare, severe, or life-threatening AEs were also reported. Physicians should be aware of the various possible cutaneous AEs associated with the COVID-19 vaccination.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Current classification of chronic urticaria is primarily based on clinical presentation of skin manifestations. Hence, therapeutic treatment is primarily aimed locally for immediate symptom relief. We reason that limiting therapeutic strategies to the skin pathology might be inadequate since cellular activation and inflammation might be triggered remotely.
METHODS: In this series two patients had exhausted all current treatments for recalcitrant urticaria but remained symptomatic. The first case was 26-year-old Caucasian female and the second was 63-year-old African American female. Both cases had frequent breakthrough urticaria requiring frequent pulsating courses of prednisone to control urticaria despite treatment with omalizumab and antihistamines. When inflammatory airway disease was discovered and managed with inhaled corticosteroid, urticaria is controlled much faster without the need of high dose immunosuppression over several years of observation. Coincidentally, autoimmune thyroiditis and anti-immunogobulin-E immunoglobulin-G titers dropped significantly in one case with sustained inhaled corticosteroid therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest a novel approach of controlling remote epithelial site inflammation in these two cases that resulted in sustained-control of urticaria symptoms without the need for systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressant. The changes of autoimmune antibodies might be the consequences of tolerance breaking from chronic lower airway inflammation as observed in other epithelial inflammatory condition like in celiac disease and rheumatoid arthritis.