transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近开发的弗莱堡后TIPS生存指数(FIPS)可以改善经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)植入失代偿期肝硬化患者的风险分类。这项研究调查了FIPS在急性肝硬化失代偿期(AD)住院患者中的预后价值。在TIPS植入的设置之外。
    方法:回顾性研究了1133例AD患者,多中心研究。90天,记录180天和1年死亡率,并使用ROC分析分析FIPS在预测这些时间点死亡率方面的表现。
    结果:90天,180天和1年死亡率为17.7%,24.4%和30.8%。单变量和多变量Cox回归模型显示,FIPS独立预测研究队列中的1年死亡率(HR1.806,95%CI1.632-1.998,p<0.0001)。在ROC分析中,FIPS在预测AD后1年内的死亡率方面提供了一贯的高性能(接收器操作员特征下的区域[AUROC]:1年死亡率.712[.679-.746],180天死亡率.740[.705-.775]和90天死亡率.761[.721-.801])。事实上,在出现静脉曲张破裂出血的患者亚组中,与已建立的预后评分相比,FIPS在预测长期死亡率(AUROC1年死亡率:.782[.724-.839])方面甚至显示出显著改善的辨别性能,例如CLIF-CAD评分(.724[.660-.788],p=.0071)或MELD3.0(.726[.662-.790],p=.0042)。
    结论:FIPS可以准确预测AD患者的死亡率,并且似乎可以更好地预测静脉曲张破裂出血患者的长期死亡率。
    BACKGROUND: The recently developed Freiburg Index of Post-TIPS Survival (FIPS) allows improved risk classification of patients with decompensated cirrhosis allocated to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation. This study investigated the prognostic value of the FIPS in patients hospitalized with acute decompensation of cirrhosis (AD), outside the setting of TIPS implantation.
    METHODS: A total of 1133 patients with AD were included in a retrospective, multi-centre study. Ninety-day, 180-day and 1-year mortality were recorded and the FIPS\' performance in predicting mortality at these time points was analysed using ROC analyses.
    RESULTS: Ninety-day, 180-day and 1-year mortality were 17.7%, 24.4% and 30.8%. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression models showed that the FIPS independently predicted 1-year mortality in the study cohort (HR 1.806, 95% CI 1.632-1.998, p < .0001). In ROC analyses, the FIPS offered consistently high performance in the prediction of mortality within 1 year after AD (area under the receiver operator characteristic [AUROC]: 1-year mortality .712 [.679-.746], 180-day mortality .740 [.705-.775] and 90-day mortality .761 [.721-.801]). In fact, in the subgroup of patients presenting with variceal bleeding, the FIPS even showed significantly improved discriminatory performance in the prediction of long-term mortality (AUROC 1-year mortality: .782 [.724-.839]) in comparison with established prognostic scores, such as the CLIF-C AD score (.724 [.660-.788], p = .0071) or MELD 3.0 (.726 [.662-.790], p = .0042).
    CONCLUSIONS: The FIPS accurately predicts mortality in patients with AD and seems to offer superior prognostication of long-term mortality in patients with variceal bleeding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:已经描述了再补偿可以改善肝硬化患者的预后。然而,经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后的再补偿尚未研究。我们评估了TIPS后再补偿对肝细胞癌(HCC)和死亡风险的影响,我们将其与代偿性肝硬化患者进行了比较。
    方法:对2008年至2022年期间接受TIPS治疗的肝硬化患者进行了一项观察性研究。使用BavenoVII定义的再补偿,包括有或没有利尿剂/肝性脑病预防的患者。使用连续代偿性肝硬化患者的前瞻性队列进行比较。
    结果:总体而言,包括208例肝硬化患者,接受TIPS的92人得到补偿,116人失代偿。一年后,24%实现了补偿。肝功能(MELD12±5vs.15±6;p=.049),LDL-胆固醇(97mg/dLvs.76mg/dL,p=.018),白细胞计数(7.96×109/dLvs.6.24×109/dL,p=.039)和血小板(129×109/dLvs.101×109/dL,p=.039)与补偿相关。再代偿与HCC风险降低相关(p=0.020)。多变量分析表明,这种风险在非补偿患者中明显更高(p=.003),但与补偿患者相比,在补偿患者中没有观察到差异(p=.816)。同样,失代偿患者的生存率较低(p=.011),而在补偿和补偿患者之间没有观察到差异(p=.677)。
    结论:TIPS后的再代偿对HCC的发生率和死亡有明显的影响,与代偿性肝硬化患者的预后相似。肝功能与再补偿有关,提示在有适应症的患者中考虑早期TIPS的重要性。
    OBJECTIVE: It has been described that recompensation can improve prognosis in patients with cirrhosis. However, recompensation after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has not been studied. We evaluated the impact of recompensation after TIPS on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and death, and we compared it with compensated cirrhosis patients.
    METHODS: An observational study of consecutive patients with cirrhosis undergoing TIPS between 2008 and 2022 was performed. Baveno VII definition of recompensation was used including patients with or without diuretics/Hepatic encephalopathy prophylaxis. A prospective cohort of consecutive compensated cirrhosis patients was used for comparison.
    RESULTS: Overall, 208 patients with cirrhosis were included, 92 compensated and 116 decompensated who underwent TIPS. After 1 year, 24% achieved recompensation. Liver function (MELD 12 ± 5 vs. 15 ± 6; p = .049), LDL-cholesterol (97 mg/dL vs. 76 mg/dL, p = .018), white cell count (7.96 × 109/dL vs. 6.24 × 109/dL, p = .039) and platelets (129 × 109/dL vs. 101 × 109/dL, p = .039) were associated with recompensation. Recompensation was associated with a reduction in the risk of HCC (p = .020). Multivariable analysis showed that this risk was significantly higher in non-recompensated patients (p = .003) but no differences were observed in recompensated compared with compensated patients (p = .816). Similarly, decompensated patients presented lower survival rates (p = .011), while no differences were observed between recompensated and compensated patients (p = .677).
    CONCLUSIONS: Recompensation after TIPS has a clear impact on the incidence of HCC and death, with a similar prognosis than patients with compensated cirrhosis. Liver function is associated with recompensation, suggesting the importance of considering early TIPS in patients with indication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝脏再补偿首先在BavenoVII标准中描述,这需要满足严格的标准。首先,必须解决肝硬化的主要原因,压制,或治愈。第二,肝硬化并发症,包括腹水,脑病,静脉曲张出血,必须在没有任何干预的情况下消失。最后,肝功能指标必须改善。此外,没有解决/抑制/治愈肝硬化和改善肝脏合成功能,并发症,包括腹水和静脉曲张出血可以通过经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)改善,这不是肝再补偿的证据。因此,根据肝脏再补偿的定义,TIPS不能实现肝再补偿。
    Hepatic recompensation is firstly described in the Baveno VII criteria, which requires the fulfillment of strict criteria. First, a primary cause of cirrhosis must be addressed, suppressed, or cured. Second, complications of liver cirrhosis, including ascites, encephalopathy, and variceal hemorrhage, must disappear without any intervention. Finally, liver function indicators must be improved. Moreover, without addressing/suppressing/curing cirrhosis and improvement in liver synthetic function, complications, including ascites and variceal hemorrhage can be improved by a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), which is not evidence of hepatic recompensation. Therefore, on the basis of the definition of hepatic recompensation, TIPS does not achieve hepatic recompensation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定临床,程序,医院,以及经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)手术持续时间的医师特征。
    方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了在2005年1月至2020年8月期间接受初次TIPS手术的18岁以上患者。排除标准是在机构外执行TIPS并且TIPS安置失败。共包括154条记录。回归分析用于确定手术持续时间的预测因子。
    结果:TIPS安置的平均年龄为57岁。70%的患者为男性和非西班牙裔白人(80.5%)。TIPS程序的平均持续时间为169分钟(SD:78)。当肝硬化的病因是病毒性时,手术持续时间较短(平均:144分钟,SD:84,p=0.008);TIPS的原因是腹水(152,SD:66,p=0.01);并且该程序不需要额外的访问(153分钟,标准差:67,p=<0.0001)。手术持续时间的主要临床预测指标是基线胆红素(β系数(β):5.6分钟,p=0.0007)。在多变量线性模型中,在那些不需要额外访问的患者中,胆红素(β:4.9分钟,p=0.005),肝硬化的病因,和医师经验是TIPS手术持续时间的主要预测因素。基线胆红素对腹水组手术持续时间的影响增加(β:19.5分钟,p=0.006),特别是当不需要额外的访问时。
    结论:该研究表明基线胆红素,肝硬化的病因,和医生对TIPS程序持续时间的经验。基线胆红素与手术时间正相关的潜在机制可能与肝纤维化程度有关。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between clinical, procedural, hospital, and physician characteristics with the duration of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure.
    METHODS: This retrospective study included patients over 18 years of age who underwent an initial TIPS procedure between January 2005 and August 2020. Exclusion criteria were TIPS performed outside the institution and failed TIPS placement. A total of 154 records were included. Regression analyses were used to identify predictors of procedural duration.
    RESULTS: The mean age at TIPS placement was 57 years. Seventy percent of patients were male and non-Hispanic whites (80.5%). The mean duration of the TIPS procedure was 169 minutes (SD: 78). Procedural duration was shorter when the etiology of cirrhosis was viral (mean: 144 min, SD: 84, p=0.008); the reason for TIPS was ascites (152, SD: 66, p=0.01); and the procedure did not require additional access (153 min, SD: 67, p=<.0001). The main clinical predictor of procedural duration was baseline bilirubin (Beta coefficient (β): 5.6 min, p=0.0007). In multivariable linear models, in those patients that did not require additional access, bilirubin (β: 4.9 min, p=0.005), etiology of cirrhosis, and physician experience were the main predictors of TIPS procedure duration. The effect of baseline bilirubin on procedural duration increased in the ascites group (β: 19.5 minutes, p=0.006), especially when additional access was not required.
    CONCLUSIONS:  The study demonstrates an association between baseline bilirubin, etiology of cirrhosis, and physician experience with the duration of the TIPS procedure. The mechanism underlying the positive association between baseline bilirubin and procedural time is possibly related to the degree of liver fibrosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肠道菌群(GM)影响肝脏疾病的进展和治疗反应。GM组成是多种多样的,并且与肝脏疾病的不同病因相关。值得注意的是,在肝硬化继发的门静脉高压症(PH)患者中观察到GM改变,乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染是中国肝硬化的主要原因。因此,了解GM改变在HBV感染相关PH患者中的作用至关重要。
    目的:评估经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)放置后HBV相关PH患者的GM改变。
    方法:这是一个前瞻性的,观察性临床研究。本研究招募了30名患者(技术成功率为100%)。纳入因HBV感染相关PH而接受TIPS治疗的食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血患者。在TIPS治疗之前和之后一个月获得粪便样本,和GM使用16S核糖体RNA扩增子测序进行分析。
    结果:TIPS安置后一个月,8例患者发生肝性脑病(HE)并被分配到HE组;其他22例患者被分配到非HE组。两组之间的门水平的转基因丰度没有实质性差异,无论TIPS治疗(所有,P>0.05)。然而,在TIPS放置之后,结果如下:(1)嗜血杆菌和埃格斯特菌的丰度增加,而厌氧菌,Dialister,Butyricicocus,在HE组中,示波螺旋体下降;(2)埃格赫拉的丰富度,链球菌,和双歧杆菌增加,而在非HE组中,Roseburia和Ruminococus的含量下降;(3)致病性Morganella的成员出现在HE组中,但未出现在非HE组中。
    结论:肠道菌群相关协同作用可能预测HBV相关PH患者TIPS放置后HE的风险。预防性微生物组治疗可用于预防和治疗TIPS放置后的HE。
    BACKGROUND: Gut microbiota (GM) affects the progression and response to treatment in liver diseases. The GM composition is diverse and associated with different etiologies of liver diseases. Notably, alterations in GM alterations are observed in patients with portal hypertension (PH) secondary to cirrhosis, with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection being a major cause of cirrhosis in China. Thus, understanding the role of GM alterations in patients with HBV infection-related PH is essential.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate GM alterations in patients with HBV-related PH after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement.
    METHODS: This was a prospective, observational clinical study. There were 30 patients (with a 100% technical success rate) recruited in the present study. Patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding due to HBV infection-associated PH who underwent TIPS were enrolled. Stool samples were obtained before and one month after TIPS treatment, and GM was analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon sequencing.
    RESULTS: One month after TIPS placement, 8 patients developed hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and were assigned to the HE group; the other 22 patients were assigned to the non-HE group. There was no substantial disparity in the abundance of GM at the phylum level between the two groups, regardless of TIPS treatment (all, P > 0.05). However, following TIPS placement, the following results were observed: (1) The abundance of Haemophilus and Eggerthella increased, whereas that of Anaerostipes, Dialister, Butyricicoccus, and Oscillospira declined in the HE group; (2) The richness of Eggerthella, Streptococcus, and Bilophila increased, whereas that of Roseburia and Ruminococcus decreased in the non-HE group; and (3) Members from the pathogenic genus Morganella appeared in the HE group but not in the non-HE group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal microbiota-related synergism may predict the risk of HE following TIPS placement in patients with HBV-related PH. Prophylactic microbiome therapies may be useful for preventing and treating HE after TIPS placement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:TIPS后门腔压力梯度(PPG)的最佳测量时间和血流动力学目标仍无定论。这项研究旨在确定接受TIPS治疗静脉曲张破裂出血的患者的血液动力学测量的理想时刻和PPG的最佳目标。
    方法:在2018年5月至2021年12月之间,前瞻性纳入了466例接受覆盖式TIPS治疗的复发性静脉曲张破裂出血患者。TIPS后立即测量PPG(立即测量PPG),24-72小时(早期PPG),TIPS放置后1个月(PPG晚期)。通过类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman方法评估在不同时间点测量的PPG之间的一致性。PPG对临床结果的未调整和混杂调整的影响(门静脉高压并发症[PHC],明显的肝性脑病[OHE],进一步失代偿,和死亡)使用精细和灰色竞争风险回归模型进行评估。
    结果:早期PPG与晚期PPG(ICC:0.34)的一致性优于即刻PPG与晚期PPG(ICC:0.23,p<0.001)。早期PPG对PHC风险具有良好的预测价值(早期PPG≥vs<12mmHg:调整后的HR[95CI]:2.17[1.33-3.55],p=0.002)以及OHE(0.40[0.17-0.91],p=0.030),而立即PPG没有。晚期PPG对PHC风险有预测价值,但对OHE无预测价值。通过以进一步失代偿的最低风险为目标,我们确定了在早期PPG为11~14mmHg时的最佳血流动力学目标,该目标与OHE风险降低相关,同时有效预防PHC.
    结论:TIPS后24至72小时测量的PPG与长期PPG和临床结果相关,和PPG11-14mmHg的血流动力学目标可减少脑病,但不影响临床疗效。
    经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后门腔压力梯度(PPG)的最佳测量时机和血流动力学目标仍无定论。在这里,我们表明,TIPS后PPG测量至少24小时,但不是在手术后立即与长期PPG和临床事件相关。因此,应将其用于决策,以改善临床结局.在手术后24-72小时测量的11-14mmHg或从TIPS前基线相对减少20%-50%的TIPS后PPG减少脑病,但不损害临床疗效,因此可用于指导肝硬化和静脉曲张破裂出血患者行覆盖性TIPS的TIPS创建和翻修。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,ID:NCT03590288。
    OBJECTIVE: The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after TIPS remains inconclusive. This study aimed to identify the ideal moment of hemodynamic measurements and the optimal target of PPG in patients undergoing covered TIPS for variceal bleeding.
    METHODS: Between May 2018 and December 2021, 466 consecutive patients with recurrent variceal bleeding treated with covered TIPS were prospectively included. Post-TIPS PPG were measured immediately (immediate PPG), 24-72 hours (early PPG), and again 1 month (late PPG) after TIPS placement. The agreement among PPGs measured at different time points was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method. The unadjusted and confounder-adjusted effects of PPGs on the clinical outcomes (portal hypertension complications [PHC], overt hepatic encephalopathy [OHE], further decompensation, and death) were assessed using Fine and Gray competing risk regression models.
    RESULTS: The agreement between early PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.34) was better than that between immediate PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.23, p<0.001). Early PPG revealed an excellent predictive value for PHC risk (early PPG ≥ vs <12 mmHg: adjusted HR [95%CI]: 2.17 [1.33-3.55], p=0.002) as well as OHE (0.40 [0.17-0.91], p=0.030) while immediate PPG did not. Late PPG showed a predictive value for PHC risk but not OHE. By targeting the lowest risk of further decompensation, we identified an optimal hemodynamic target with early PPG ranging 11 to 14 mmHg that was associated with a decreased risk of OHE while effectively preventing PHC.
    CONCLUSIONS: PPG measured 24 to 72 hours after TIPS correlates with long term PPG and clinical outcomes, and hemodynamic target with a PPG 11-14 mmHg reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy.
    UNASSIGNED: The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) remains inconclusive. Here we show that post-TIPS PPG measured at least 24 hours but not immediately after the procedure correlated with long-term PPG and clinical events, therefore should be used for decision making in order to improve clinical outcomes. Targeting post-TIPS PPG at 11-14 mmHg or 20%-50% relative reduction from pre-TIPS baseline that measured 24-72 hours after procedure reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy, therefore could be used to guide TIPS creation and revision in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding undergoing covered TIPS.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03590288.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是一种缓解失代偿期肝硬化患者门脉高压的方法。虽然先前的研究强调了TIPS中的种族差异,亚裔美国人不包括在调查中。这项研究旨在调查接受TIPS的亚裔美国患者术后即刻结局的差异。
    该研究确定了2015-2020年第四季度在全国住院患者样本中接受TIPS的亚裔美国人和白人患者。术前因素,包括人口统计,合并症,主要付款人身份,和医院的特点,两组之间的倾向评分匹配为1:2。检查TIPS后的院内结局。
    有6,658名患者接受了TIPS,其中有128名(1.92%)亚裔美国人和4,574名(68.70%)白种人,218名高加索人与所有亚裔美国人相匹配。亚裔美国人住院死亡率较高(14.06%vs.7.34%,p=0.04)和更高的总住院费用(253,756±37,867与163,391±10,265美元,p=0.02)。肝性脑病的发生,急性肾损伤,转移到其他医院设施,和住院时间在队列之间没有差异。
    尽管他们患肝硬化的风险增加,亚裔美国人在TIPS中的代表性明显不足,并且在TIPS后住院死亡率更高。这突出了亚裔美国人对肝硬化的诊断和治疗的需要。
    UNASSIGNED: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a procedure to alleviate portal hypertension in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. While prior research highlighted racial disparities in TIPS, Asian Americans were not included in the investigation. This study aimed to investigate disparities in the immediate postprocedural outcomes among Asian American patients who underwent TIPS.
    UNASSIGNED: The study identified Asian American and Caucasian patients who underwent TIPS in the National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Preprocedural factors, including demographics, comorbidities, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics, were matched by 1:2 propensity-score matching between the groups. In-hospital outcomes after TIPS were examined.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 6,658 patients who underwent TIPS with 128 (1.92%) Asian Americans and 4,574 (68.70%) Caucasians, where 218 Caucasians were matched to all Asian Americans. Asian Americans had higher in-hospital mortality (14.06% vs. 7.34%, p = 0.04) and higher total hospital charge (253,756 ± 37,867 vs. 163,391 ± 10,265 US dollars, p = 0.02). The occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy, acute kidney injury, transfers out to other hospital facilities, and length of stay did not differ between cohorts.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite their heightened risk for cirrhosis, Asian Americans are significantly underrepresented in TIPS and had higher in-hospital mortality after TIPS. This highlights the need for enhanced access to diagnosis and treatment care of liver cirrhosis for Asian Americans.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在探讨美洲原住民经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的直接结果的种族差异,一组肝硬化患病率较高,但在以前的TIPS研究中,由于其人口规模较小,他们是“隐形组”。
    方法:该研究确定了2015-2020年第四季度在国家/全国住院样本(NIS)数据库中接受TIPS的美洲原住民和白种人。术前因素,包括人口统计,提示的指示,合并症,肝病的病因,主要付款人身份,和医院的特点,与1:5的倾向得分匹配。然后比较两个队列之间的住院TIPS后结果。
    结果:有6,658名患者接受了TIPS,其中101(1.52%)是美洲原住民,4,574(68.70%)是白种人。美洲原住民表现得更年轻,社会经济地位较低,并显示出更高的酒精滥用率和相关的肝脏疾病。在倾向得分匹配后,美洲原住民在住院后的TIPS结果具有可比性,包括死亡率(8.33%vs9.09%,p=1.00),肝性脑病(18.75%vs25.84%,p=0.19),急性肾损伤(28.13%vs30.62%,p=0.71),和其他不良事件。美洲原住民从入院到手术也有类似的等待时间(2.15±0.30vs2.87±0.21天,p=0.13),住院时间(7.43±0.63vs8.62±0.47天,p=0.13),和总成本(158,299±14,218.2vs169,425±8,600.7美元,p=0.50)。
    结论:与倾向匹配的白种人相比,美洲原住民在TIPS后的即时结果相似。虽然这些结果强调了向美洲原住民提供TIPS的有效医疗保健服务,必须进一步研究手术后的长期结果。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to explore racial disparities in immediate outcomes of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) among Native Americans, a group that have higher prevalence of liver cirrhosis but were the \"invisible group\" in previous TIPS studies due to their small population size.
    METHODS: The study identified Native Americans and Caucasians who underwent TIPS in National/Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from Q4 2015-2020. Preoperative factors, including demographics, indications for TIPS, comorbidities, etiologies for liver disease, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics, were matched by 1:5 propensity score matching. In-hospital post-TIPS outcomes were then compared between the two cohorts.
    RESULTS: There were 6,658 patients who underwent TIPS, where 101 (1.52%) were Native Americans and 4,574 (68.70%) were Caucasians. Native Americans presented as younger, with a lower socioeconomic status, and displayed higher rates of alcohol abuse and related liver diseases. After propensity-score matching, Native Americans had comparable in-hospital post-TIPS outcomes including mortality (8.33% vs 9.09%, p = 1.00), hepatic encephalopathy (18.75% vs 25.84%, p = 0.19), acute kidney injury (28.13% vs 30.62%, p = 0.71), and other adverse events. Native Americans also had similar wait from admission to operation (2.15 ± 0.30 vs 2.87 ± 0.21 days, p = 0.13), hospital length of stay (7.43 ± 0.63 vs 8.62 ± 0.47 days, p = 0.13), and total costs (158,299 ± 14,218.2 vs 169,425 ± 8,600.7 dollars, p = 0.50).
    CONCLUSIONS: Native Americans had similar immediate outcomes after TIPS compared to their propensity-matched Caucasians. While these results underscore effective healthcare delivery of TIPS to Native Americans, it is imperative to pursue further research for long-term post-procedure outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)和肝硬化患者可表现出严重门脉高压的特征,门静脉肿瘤血栓形成(PVTT)可进一步恶化。由于这些患者的技术困难和生存期短,传统上,HCC被认为是经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的相对禁忌。然而,越来越多的证据,主要来自中国,支持TIPS在HCC中的使用。本研究旨在分析TIPS在HCC患者中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:从2000年到2023年5月,MEDLINE,搜索Embase和Scopus以分析TIPS在HCC中的结果。技术和临床成功,不良事件(AE)和死亡率是评估的主要结局.通过使用随机效应模型,将事件发生率合并.
    结果:共有19项研究纳入了1498名患者的最终分析。合并技术和临床成功率TIPS在HCC为98.8%(98.0-99.7)和94.1%(91.2-97.0),分别。TIPS之后,腹水控制在89.2%(85.1-93.3)的病例中,在随访中,有17.2%(9.4-25.0)的病例观察到再出血。总体AE的合并发生率,严重AE和TIPS后肝性脑病(HE)为5.2%(2.5-7.9),0.1%(0.0-0.4)和25.1%(18.7-31.5),分别。关于后续行动,11.9%(7.8-15.9)的患者出现分流功能障碍,需要重新干预。
    结论:本分析支持可行性,TIPS在肝癌门脉高压治疗中的安全性和有效性。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis can present with features of severe portal hypertension, which can be worsened further by portal vein tumoral thrombosis (PVTT). Due to the technical difficulties and short survival of these patients, HCC was traditionally considered a relative contra-indication for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). However, there is an increasing body of evidence, mainly from China, supporting the use of TIPS in HCC. The present study aimed at analyzing the efficacy and safety of TIPS in patients with HCC.
    METHODS: From 2000 through May 2023, MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus were searched for studies analyzing the outcome of TIPS in HCC. Technical and clinical success, adverse events (AE) and mortality were the main outcomes assessed. With the use of a random effects model, the event rates were combined.
    RESULTS: Total 19 studies with 1498 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled technical and clinical success rates with TIPS in HCC were 98.8% (98.0-99.7) and 94.1% (91.2-97.0), respectively. After TIPS, ascites was controlled in 89.2% (85.1-93.3) of the cases, while rebleeding was observed in 17.2% (9.4-25.0) of cases on follow-up. The pooled incidence of overall AE, serious AE and post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (HE) was 5.2% (2.5-7.9), 0.1% (0.0-0.4) and 25.1% (18.7-31.5), respectively. On follow-up, 11.9% (7.8-15.9) of the patients developed shunt dysfunction requiring re-intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis supports the feasibility, safety and efficacy of TIPS in the management of portal hypertension in patients with HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是一种基于导管的,降低门静脉高压症的微创手术。该研究的目的是调查TIPS后的功能障碍和死亡率,并确定与这些事件相关的因素。
    方法:对1993-2018年在单中心接受TIPS植入的834例患者进行回顾性分析。估计累积发病率曲线,和虚弱模型用于评估潜在影响变量与至功能障碍或死亡的时间之间的关联.
    结果:1-,2-,5年死亡率为20.9%(置信区间(CI)17.7-24.1),22.5%(CI19.1-25.8),和25.0%(CI:21.1-28.8),1年,2年,5年功能障碍率为28.4%(CI24.6-32.3),38.9%(CI34.5-43.3),和52.4%(CI47.2-57.6)。使用覆膜支架是TIPS功能障碍的保护因素(风险比(HR)0.47,CI0.33-0.68),但对生存没有主要作用(HR0.95,CI0.58-1.56)。死亡的危险因素是紧急情况下的TIPS(HR2.78,CI1.19-6.50),先前的TIPS功能障碍(HR2.43,CI1.28-4.62),弗莱堡评分增加(HR1.45,CI0.93-2.28)。
    结论:使用覆膜支架是TIPS功能障碍的重要保护因素。而以前的TIPS功能障碍,紧急TIPS植入,弗莱堡评分升高与死亡率增加相关.对危险因素的认识可能有助于更好地选择可能从TIPS程序中受益的患者,并改善早期发现血栓形成/狭窄的临床随访。
    使用覆膜支架可降低经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后功能障碍的风险。TIPS功能障碍,紧急TIPS放置,高弗莱堡评分与TIPS患者的高死亡率相关。
    结论:与覆盖支架相比,未覆盖支架的功能障碍风险更高。经颈静脉肝内门体分流功能障碍增加了干预后瞬时死亡的风险。较高的弗莱堡评分会增加干预后的死亡率。急诊经颈静脉肝内门体分流术植入降低生存率.
    OBJECTIVE: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a catheter-based, minimally invasive procedure to reduce portal hypertension. The aim of the study was to investigate dysfunction and mortality after TIPS and to identify factors associated with these events.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 834 patients undergoing TIPS implantation in a single center from 1993-2018 was performed. Cumulative incidence curves were estimated, and frailty models were used to assess associations between potentially influential variables and time to dysfunction or death.
    RESULTS: 1-, 2-, and 5-year mortality rates were 20.9% (confidence interval (CI) 17.7-24.1), 22.5% (CI 19.1-25.8), and 25.0% (CI: 21.1-28.8), 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year dysfunction rates were 28.4% (CI 24.6-32.3), 38.9% (CI 34.5-43.3), and 52.4% (CI 47.2-57.6). The use of covered stents is a protective factor regarding TIPS dysfunction (hazard ratio (HR) 0.47, CI 0.33-0.68) but does not play a major role in survival (HR 0.95, CI 0.58-1.56). Risk factors for mortality are rather TIPS in an emergency setting (HR 2.78, CI 1.19-6.50), a previous TIPS dysfunction (HR 2.43, CI 1.28-4.62), and an increased Freiburg score (HR 1.45, CI 0.93-2.28).
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of covered stents is an important protective factor regarding TIPS dysfunction. Whereas previous TIPS dysfunction, emergency TIPS implantation, and an elevated Freiburg score are associated with increased mortality. Awareness of risk factors could contribute to a better selection of patients who may benefit from a TIPS procedure and improve clinical follow-up with regard to early detection of thrombosis/stenosis.
    UNASSIGNED: The use of covered stents reduces the risk of dysfunction after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). TIPS dysfunction, emergency TIPS placement, and a high Freiburg score are linked to higher mortality rates in TIPS patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: The risk of dysfunction is higher for uncovered stents compared to covered stents. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction increases the risk of instantaneous death after the intervention. A higher Freiburg score increases the rate of death after the intervention. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt implantations in emergency settings reduce survival rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号