transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)和肝硬化患者可表现出严重门脉高压的特征,门静脉肿瘤血栓形成(PVTT)可进一步恶化。由于这些患者的技术困难和生存期短,传统上,HCC被认为是经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的相对禁忌。然而,越来越多的证据,主要来自中国,支持TIPS在HCC中的使用。本研究旨在分析TIPS在HCC患者中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:从2000年到2023年5月,MEDLINE,搜索Embase和Scopus以分析TIPS在HCC中的结果。技术和临床成功,不良事件(AE)和死亡率是评估的主要结局.通过使用随机效应模型,将事件发生率合并.
    结果:共有19项研究纳入了1498名患者的最终分析。合并技术和临床成功率TIPS在HCC为98.8%(98.0-99.7)和94.1%(91.2-97.0),分别。TIPS之后,腹水控制在89.2%(85.1-93.3)的病例中,在随访中,有17.2%(9.4-25.0)的病例观察到再出血。总体AE的合并发生率,严重AE和TIPS后肝性脑病(HE)为5.2%(2.5-7.9),0.1%(0.0-0.4)和25.1%(18.7-31.5),分别。关于后续行动,11.9%(7.8-15.9)的患者出现分流功能障碍,需要重新干预。
    结论:本分析支持可行性,TIPS在肝癌门脉高压治疗中的安全性和有效性。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis can present with features of severe portal hypertension, which can be worsened further by portal vein tumoral thrombosis (PVTT). Due to the technical difficulties and short survival of these patients, HCC was traditionally considered a relative contra-indication for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). However, there is an increasing body of evidence, mainly from China, supporting the use of TIPS in HCC. The present study aimed at analyzing the efficacy and safety of TIPS in patients with HCC.
    METHODS: From 2000 through May 2023, MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus were searched for studies analyzing the outcome of TIPS in HCC. Technical and clinical success, adverse events (AE) and mortality were the main outcomes assessed. With the use of a random effects model, the event rates were combined.
    RESULTS: Total 19 studies with 1498 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled technical and clinical success rates with TIPS in HCC were 98.8% (98.0-99.7) and 94.1% (91.2-97.0), respectively. After TIPS, ascites was controlled in 89.2% (85.1-93.3) of the cases, while rebleeding was observed in 17.2% (9.4-25.0) of cases on follow-up. The pooled incidence of overall AE, serious AE and post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (HE) was 5.2% (2.5-7.9), 0.1% (0.0-0.4) and 25.1% (18.7-31.5), respectively. On follow-up, 11.9% (7.8-15.9) of the patients developed shunt dysfunction requiring re-intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis supports the feasibility, safety and efficacy of TIPS in the management of portal hypertension in patients with HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    异位静脉曲张占静脉曲张出血的5%,发生在胃食管区域之外。这篇综述评估了经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)用于异位静脉曲张治疗的疗效。通过PubMed进行全面搜索,Scopus,WebofScience,Embase使用相关关键字进行到2023年1月16日。包括病例报告和病例系列,其中少于10例TIPS用于异位静脉曲张治疗。质量评估遵循JoannaBriggs研究所的病例报告清单。这项系统评价评估了43项研究,涉及50例接受TIPS的异位静脉曲张患者。患者的平均年龄为54.3岁,一半是女性,还有两个人怀孕了.酒精性肝病(48%)和丙型肝炎感染(26%)是门脉高压的常见原因。在32%和28%的患者中报告了腹水和脾肿大,分别。直肠,口服,造口静脉曲张出血占62%,16%,22%的病人,分别。异位静脉曲张主要位于十二指肠(28%)和直肠(26%)区域。并发症影响了42%的患者,11例再次出血,7例肝性脑病。平均随访12个月,最后,5人接受了肝脏移植。TIPS后死亡率为18%。尽管有并发症和显著的死亡率,在接受TIPS治疗的近半数异位静脉曲张破裂出血患者中观察到了良好的结局.需要进一步的研究来完善策略并改善患者的预后。
    Ectopic varices account for 5% of variceal bleedings and occur outside the gastro-esophageal region. This review evaluates the efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for ectopic variceal management. A comprehensive search through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted until January 16, 2023, using relevant keywords. Case reports and case series with fewer than 10 patients on TIPS for ectopic variceal management were included. The quality assessment followed the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for case reports. This systematic review evaluated 43 studies involving 50 patients with ectopic varices undergoing TIPS. Patients had a mean age of 54.3 years, half were female, and two were pregnant. Alcoholic liver disease (48%) and hepatitis C infection (26%) were common causes of portal hypertension. Ascites and splenomegaly were reported in 32% and 28% of the patients, respectively. Rectal, oral, and stomal variceal bleeding accounted for 62%, 16%, and 22% of the patients, respectively. Ectopic varices were mainly located in the duodenum (28%) and rectum (26%) regions. Complications affected 42% of the patients, re-bleeding in eleven and hepatic encephalopathy in seven. The follow-up lasted 12 months on average, and finally, 5 received a liver transplant. Mortality post-TIPS was 18%. Despite complications and a notable mortality rate, favorable outcomes were observed in almost half of the patients with ectopic variceal bleeding managed with TIPS. Further research is warranted to refine strategies and improve patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:据报道,营养不良和肌肉减少对肝硬化患者的预后产生不利影响。有新的证据表明,营养不良和肌少症增加了经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后肝性脑病(HE)和死亡率的风险。当前的系统评价旨在确定是否有证据支持肝硬化患者的营养状况与TIPS后结局之间的关联。
    方法:PubMed的电子数据库,Embase,和Scopus从开始至2023年6月3日进行了检索,以研究分析营养状况对肝硬化患者TIPS后结局的影响.
    结果:共有22项研究纳入系统综述。通过L3水平的骨骼肌指数(SMI)评估肌肉减少症,横向腰大肌厚度,腰大肌密度,根据ICD营养不良,相对肌肉减少症与过度肥胖,血脂谱,控制营养状况评分,身体成分分析,医院脆弱风险评分,内脏和皮下脂肪面积指数。本系统评价的12项研究中有10项显示与TIPS后HE的发生率显着相关。14项研究中有13项报告说,营养不良的存在与TIPS后死亡率的增加有关。一项研究报告说,少肌症是肝功能衰竭的独立预测因子,另一项研究报道,TIPS前SMI是TIPS后SMI实质性改善的独立预测因子。
    结论:当前的系统评价显示,TIPS前营养不良或肌少症的存在是TIPS后不良结局的独立预测因素。将这些参数结合到当前的预测模型中可以提供额外的预后信息。
    结论:营养评估应该是对计划TIPS的患者进行评估的一部分,以预测手术后的不良事件。
    OBJECTIVE: Malnutrition and sarcopenia have been reported to adversely affect the outcome of patients with cirrhosis of the liver. There is an emerging body of evidence suggesting malnutrition and sarcopenia increase the risk of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). The current systematic review aims to determine whether the body of evidence supports an association between nutritional status and post-TIPS outcomes in patients with cirrhosis.
    METHODS: Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to June 3, 2023, for studies analysing the effect of nutritional status on post-TIPS outcomes in patients with cirrhosis.
    RESULTS: A total of 22 studies were included in the systemic review. Assessment of sarcopenia was done by skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the L3 level, transversal psoas muscle thickness, psoas muscle density, malnutrition as per ICD, relative sarcopenia with excess adiposity, lipid profile, controlling nutritional status score, body composition analysis, hospital frailty risk score, and visceral and subcutaneous fat area index. Ten out of 12 studies in this systematic review showed a significant association with the incidence of post-TIPS HE. Thirteen out of 14 studies reported that the presence of malnutrition was associated with increased odds of mortality following TIPS. One study reported sarcopenia as an independent predictor of liver failure, and another study reported that Pre-TIPS SMI was an independent predictor of substantial improvement in post-TIPS SMI.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current systematic review shows that the presence of pre-TIPS malnutrition or sarcopenia is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes after TIPS. Incorporating these parameters into present prediction models can provide additional prognostic information.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional assessment should be part of the evaluation of patients planned for TIPS for prediction of adverse events after the procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:预防再出血至关重要,但是对于肝硬化和门静脉血栓形成(PVT)患者的最佳预防技术仍存在争议。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)与内镜治疗(ET)加非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBB)预防静脉曲张再出血的作用.
    方法:PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience数据库从成立到2023年5月18日都在搜索。这些研究是使用预定的标准进行筛选的,提取了相关数据,和汇总分析使用ReviewerManager5.4.1软件进行。
    结果:我们检索了1032项研究,其中包括5项研究,共272例患者。TIPS组术后静脉曲张再出血率明显低于ET+NSBBs组(比值比[OR]=0.19,95%置信区间[CI]=0.11-0.35,P<0.05,I2=0%),门静脉再通率较高(OR=7.92,95%CI=3.04~20.67,P<0.05,I2=0%)。两组之间的肝性脑病(HE)和死亡率没有差异。
    结论:我们的结果表明,TIPS比ET加NSBBs更有效地预防静脉曲张再出血而不增加肝性脑病的风险,但这种获益并没有转化为生存率的提高.因此,对于肝硬化和PVT患者,ET加NSBB预防静脉曲张再出血可能更可取.然而,需要更多涉及其他患者人群的大规模多中心随机对照试验来验证这两种治疗方法的临床疗效,并确保其具有普适性.
    OBJECTIVE: Preventing rebleeding is crucial, but the best prevention technique for patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains debatable. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with endoscopic therapy (ET) plus nonselective beta-blockers (NSBBs) for preventing variceal rebleeding in this patient population.
    METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception until May 18, 2023. The studies were screened using predetermined criteria, relevant data were extracted, and pooled analyses were performed using the Reviewer Manager 5.4.1 software.
    RESULTS: We retrieved 1032 studies, of which 5 studies comprising a total of 272 patients were included. The postoperative variceal rebleeding rate was significantly lower in the TIPS group than in the ET + NSBBs group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11-0.35, P < 0.05, I2 = 0%), but the portal vein recanalization rate was higher (OR = 7.92, 95% CI = 3.04-20.67, P < 0.05, I2 = 0%). The rates of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and mortality did not differ between the groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that TIPS prevents variceal rebleeding without increasing the hepatic encephalopathy risk more effectively than ET plus NSBBs, but this benefit did not translate into improved survival. Thus, it may be preferable to ET plus NSBBs for preventing variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis and PVT. However, more large-scale and multicenter randomized controlled trials involving other patient populations are required to verify the clinical efficacy of both these treatments and ensure generalizability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是肝硬化患者治疗门静脉高压相关疾病的常用方法,包括静脉曲张出血和顽固性腹水。然而,虽然在确定患者是否是TIPS的良好候选者时,TIPS后肝性脑病(HE)的风险增加是重要的,目前没有广泛使用的方法来预测后TIPSHE的发展,尽管终末期肝病(MELD)评分模型用于预测TIPS后死亡率。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估肌肉减少症作为TIPS患者HE和死亡率的危险因素。
    方法:使用综合检索策略来确定肌肉减少症患者TIPS后HE和死亡率的报告。2023年3月接受TIPS治疗的肝硬化非肌肉减少症患者.使用开放式元分析师来计算结果。
    结果:12项研究有2056名患者符合纳入标准,并被纳入最终的荟萃分析。肌肉减少症与TIPS后HE率显著高于非肌肉减少症相关(风险比[RR]:1.68,95%CI:1.48-1.92,p<0.00001,I2=65%),以及明显更高的TIPS后死亡率(RR:1.73,95%CI:1.14-2.64,p<0.00001,I2=87%)。
    结论:患有肌少症的患者发生TIPSHE后和死亡的风险显著增加。在权衡肝硬化患者进行TIPS的风险和益处时,应考虑肌肉减少症的存在。需要进一步的研究来确定重要危险因素的临床效用,如肌肉减少对TIPS后结局的影响。
    OBJECTIVE: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a commonly performed procedure in patients with liver cirrhosis to treat portal hypertension-related conditions, including variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. However, while the increased risk of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after TIPS is important to consider when determining whether a patient is a good candidate for TIPS, currently there is no widely used method to predict the development of post-TIPS HE, although the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is used to predict post-TIPS mortality. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate sarcopenia as a risk factor for HE and mortality in patients undergoing TIPS.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was used to identify reports of post-TIPS HE and mortality in sarcopenia vs. non-sarcopenia patients with liver cirrhosis who received TIPS in March 2023. Open Meta Analyst was used to compute the results.
    RESULTS: Twelve studies with 2056 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. Sarcopenia was associated with a significantly higher post-TIPS HE rate than non-sarcopenia (risk ratio [RR]: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.48-1.92, p < 0.00001, I2 = 65%), as well as a significantly higher post-TIPS mortality rate (RR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.14-2.64, p < 0.00001, I2 = 87%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sarcopenia have a significantly increased risk of post-TIPS HE and mortality. Presence of sarcopenia should be considered when weighing the risks and benefits of performing TIPS in patients with cirrhosis. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of important risk factors such as sarcopenia on post-TIPS outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本荟萃分析旨在评估不同风险评估模型(RAM)对肝硬化门脉高压患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后生存的影响。
    方法:对PubMed的系统搜索,WOS,Embase,科克伦,和CNKI从成立到2023年2月进行。我们全面审查和汇总了许多研究的数据,涵盖了流行的RAM,如Child-Turcotte-Pugh,终末期肝病模型(MELD),MELD-钠(MELD-Na),弗莱堡后TIPS生存指数(FIPS),胆红素-血小板,慢性肝功能衰竭联盟急性失代偿评分,以及不同时间范围内的白蛋白-胆红素等级。对于这项研究,短期是指一年内的结果,而长期是指一年以上的结果。选择接受者工作特征(AUC)曲线或一致性统计下的面积作为评估在六个预定时间间隔内死亡率结果的预测能力的度量。使用稳健的方差估计来确定各个时间点的平均效应大小。
    结果:MELD始终是主要的短期生存预测因子,特别是1个月(±2周)(AUC:0.72)和3个月(±1个月)生存期(AUC:0.72)。MELD-Na表现出最佳的长期预测能力,在3.5年(±1.5年)时AUC为0.70。FIPS在6个月(±2个月)存活(AUC:0.68)和总体无移植存活(AUC:0.75)中表现良好。当应用于特定亚组时,在RAM中观察到功效细微差别。元回归强调了MELD和FIPS等模型中潜在的预测因子重叠。
    结论:本荟萃分析强调MELD评分是TIPS后短期生存的主要预测因子。同时,FIPS评分和MELD-Na模型在预测长期结局方面表现出潜力。该研究强调了RAM选择对提高患者预后的重要性,并主张进行其他研究以证实这些发现并微调TIPS中的风险评估。
    OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of different risk assessment models (RAMs) for survival after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.
    METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, WOS, Embase, Cochrane, and CNKI from inception to February 2023 was conducted. We comprehensively reviewed and aggregated data from numerous studies covering prevalent RAMs such as Child-Turcotte-Pugh, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD-Sodium (MELD-Na), the Freiburg Index of Post-TIPS Survival (FIPS), Bilirubin-platelet, Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Acute Decompensation score, and Albumin-Bilirubin grade across different timeframes. For this study, short-term is defined as outcomes within a year while long-term refers to outcomes beyond one year. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve or Concordance Statistics was chosen as the metric to assess predictive capacity for mortality outcomes across six predetermined time intervals. Mean effect sizes at various time points were determined using robust variance estimation.
    RESULTS: MELD consistently stood out as a primary short-term survival predictor, particularly for 1 month (± 2 weeks) (AUC: 0.72) and 3 months of (± 1 month) survival (AUC: 0.72). MELD-Na showed the best long-term predictive ability, with an AUC of 0.70 at 3.5 years (± 1.5 years). FIPS performed well for 6 months of (± 2 months) survival (AUC: 0.68) and overall transplant-free survival (AUC: 0.75). Efficacy nuances were observed in RAMs when applied to particular subgroups. Meta-regression emphasized the potential predictor overlaps in models like MELD and FIPS.
    CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis underscores the MELD score as the premier predictor for short-term survival following TIPS. Meanwhile, the FIPS score and MELD-Na model exhibit potential in forecasting long-term outcomes. The study accentuates the significance of RAM selection for enhancing patient outcomes and advocates for additional research to corroborate these findings and fine-tune risk assessment in TIPS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后,肝硬化患者出现少肌症与肝性脑病(HE)之间的关系尚待确定。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以全面总结有关这种关联的现有证据。
    方法:在PubMed,EMBASE,和WebofScience数据库。该协议已在PROSPERO(CRD42023398856)上正式注册。TIPS后HE发生的风险比(HR)和相应的95%置信区间(CIs)是从比较有和没有肌肉减少症的肝硬化患者的研究中提取的。然后使用随机效应模型组合这些数据。
    结果:7项队列研究中符合我们资格标准的1135名患者被纳入荟萃分析。我们的发现表明,与没有肌少症的肝硬化患者相比,患有肌少症的肝硬化患者发生TIPSHE后的风险明显更高(HR,2.35;95%CI=1.32-4.19;p=0.004;I2=75%)。这些发现在按肝病病因分层的亚组之间保持一致,研究地点,和肝功能障碍的严重程度。
    结论:研究表明,在肝硬化患者中,肌少症与TIPSHE后可能性增加密切相关。
    The association between the presence of sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis and the onset of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is yet to be established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a thorough summary of the available evidence on this association.
    A thorough search of the literature was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. The protocol was duly registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023398856). The hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the occurrence of HE after TIPS were extracted from studies comparing cirrhotic patients with and without sarcopenia. These data were then combined using a random-effect model.
    A total of 1135 patients from seven cohort studies that met our eligibility criteria were included in the meta-analysis. Our findings indicate a significantly higher risk of post-TIPS HE among cirrhotic patients with sarcopenia compared to those without sarcopenia (HR, 2.35; 95% CIs 1.32-4.19; p = 0.004; I2 = 75%). The findings remained consistent across subgroups stratified by liver disease etiology, study location, and severity of hepatic dysfunction.
    The study demonstrated that sarcopenia was strongly linked to an increased likelihood post-TIPS HE among cirrhotic patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:明显的肝性脑病仍然是TIPS术后的严重并发症。在接受TIPS治疗的患者中,伴随SPSS与HE风险增加相关。
    目的:对TIPS创建时SPSS预防性栓塞的有效性和安全性进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,我们在2023年4月之前搜索了WebofScience数据库,以确定关于TIPS置入前顺行栓塞SPSS与TIPS后HE发生率之间关联的研究.使用赔率比(OR)及其相应的95%CIs来确定结果的显着差异。
    结果:纳入4项研究,纳入1243例肝硬化患者接受TIPS治疗静脉曲张破裂出血。一项荟萃分析显示,没有同时进行SPSS栓塞的TIPS与明显HE的风险增加相关(OR2.41,95%CI1.32-4.38;p=0.004)。死亡风险(0.79,95%CI0.58-1.07;p=0.13),两组间静脉曲张再出血(0.94,95%CI0.66-1.34;p=0.74)和分流功能障碍(1.40,95%CI0.51-3.83;p=0.51)无显著差异。
    结论:SPSS患病率与TIPS后明显HE风险增加相关。在TIPS创建过程中并发顺行SPSS栓塞可降低明显HE的风险,而不会增加其他并发症。
    BACKGROUND: Overt hepatic encephalopathy remains a serious complication after TIPS. Concomitant SPSS is associated with an increased risk of HE in patients treated with TIPS.
    OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness and safety of the prophylactic embolization of SPSS at the time of TIPS creation.
    METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched up to April 2023 to identify studies on the association between antegrade embolized SPSS before TIPS placement and the incidence of post-TIPS HE. Odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% CIs were used to identify significant differences in the outcomes.
    RESULTS: Four studies enrolling 1243 patients with cirrhosis who received TIPS for variceal bleeding were included. A meta-analysis revealed that TIPS without simultaneous SPSS embolization was associated with an increased risk of overt HE (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.32-4.38; p = 0.004). The risks of mortality (0.79, 95% CI 0.58-1.07; p = 0.13), variceal rebleeding (0.94, 95% CI 0.66-1.34; p = 0.74) and shunt dysfunction (1.40, 95% CI 0.51-3.83; p = 0.51) did not significantly differ among the groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: SPSS prevalence was associated with an increased risk of overt HE after TIPS. Concurrent antegrade SPSS embolization during TIPS creation reduced the risk for overt HE without increasing other complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:调查技术结果,临床结果,小儿门静脉高压症(PHT)的经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)通畅。
    方法:对MEDLINE/PubMed的系统搜索,EMBASE,Cochrane数据库和ClinicalTrials.gov,WHOICTRP注册是根据系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行的。在PROSPERO数据库中注册了先验协议。包括有关儿科患者(样本量≥5例,年龄上限为21岁的患者)和接受任何适应症的TIPS创建的PHT的原始全文文章。
    结果:纳入了17项研究,其中284名患者(平均加权年龄为10.1岁),平均加权随访时间为3.6年。在93.3%(95CI,88.5%-97.1%)的患者中,TIPS技术上成功,主要并发症发生率为3.2%(95CI:0.7-6.9),调整肝性脑病发生率为2.9%(95CI,0.6-6.3)。合并的2年主要和次要通畅率分别为61.8%(95CI:50.0-72.4)和99.8%(95CI:96.2%-100.0%)。支架类型(P=0.002)和年龄(P=.04)被确定为临床成功的异质性的重要来源。在亚组分析中,在大多数覆膜支架的研究中,临床成功率分别为85.9%(95CI:77.8-91.4),在中位年龄≥12岁的研究中,有87.6%(95%CI:74.1-94.6)。
    结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析证明TIPS是治疗小儿PHT的可行和安全的方法。为了长期改善临床结果和通畅性,应鼓励使用覆膜支架.
    To investigate the technical outcome, clinical outcome, and patency of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in pediatric portal hypertension (PHT).
    A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP registries was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. An a priori protocol was registered at the PROSPERO database. Original full-text articles on pediatric patients (sample size of ≥5 patients with upper age limit of 21 years) with PHT who underwent TIPS creation for any indication were included.
    Seventeen studies with 284 patients (average-weighted age of 10.1 years) were included, with an average-weighted follow-up of 3.6 years. TIPS was technically successful in 93.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.5%-97.1%) of patients, with a major adverse event rate of 3.2% (95% CI, 0.7-6.9) and adjusted hepatic encephalopathy rate of 2.9% (95% CI, 0.6-6.3). The pooled 2-year primary and secondary patency rates were 61.8% (95% CI, 50.0-72.4) and 99.8% (95% CI, 96.2%-100.0%), respectively. Stent type (P = .002) and age (P = .04) were identified as a significant source of heterogeneity for clinical success. In subgroup analysis, the clinical success rate was 85.9% (95% CI, 77.8-91.4) in studies with a majority of covered stents, and 87.6% (95% CI, 74.1-94.6) in studies with a median age of 12 years or older.
    This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that a TIPS is a feasible and safe treatment for pediatric PHT. To improve clinical outcome and patency on the long term, the use of covered stents should be encouraged.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)预防胃食管静脉曲张再出血的作用仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较静脉曲张再出血的发生率,分流功能障碍,脑病,仅接受TIPS治疗的患者与接受TIPS联合VE治疗的患者之间的死亡。
    我们使用PubMed进行了文献检索,EMBASE,Scopus,和Cochrane数据库,用于比较单独TIPS和有VE的TIPS的并发症发生率的所有研究。主要结果是静脉曲张再出血。次要结果包括分流功能障碍,脑病,和死亡。根据支架类型进行亚组分析(覆盖与裸金属)。随机效应模型用于计算相对风险(RR)和相应的95%置信区间(CI)。P值<0.05被认为是统计学上显著的。
    纳入了11项研究,共1,075例患者(597:单独TIPS和478:TIPS加VE)。与单独的TIPS相比,有VE的TIPS患者静脉曲张再出血的发生率显著降低(RR:0.59,95%CI:0.43~0.81,P=0.001).亚组分析显示,覆膜支架的结果相似(RR:0.56,95%CI:0.36-0.86,P=0.008),但两组在裸支架和联合支架的亚组分析中没有显着差异。脑病风险差异无统计学意义(RR:0.84,95%CI:0.66-1.06,P=0.13),分流功能障碍(RR:0.88,95%CI:0.64-1.19,P=0.40),和死亡(RR:0.87,95%CI:0.65-1.17,P=0.34)。当根据支架类型进行分层时,组间的这些次要结果也没有类似差异。
    在TIPS中添加VE可降低肝硬化患者静脉曲张再出血的发生率。然而,仅在有覆盖支架的情况下观察到获益.需要进一步的大规模随机对照试验来验证我们的发现。
    UNASSIGNED: The role of variceal embolization (VE) during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation for preventing gastroesophageal variceal rebleeding remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the incidence of variceal rebleeding, shunt dysfunction, encephalopathy, and death between patients treated with TIPS alone and those treated with TIPS in combination with VE.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for all studies comparing the incidence of complications between TIPS alone and TIPS with VE. The primary outcome was variceal rebleeding. Secondary outcomes include shunt dysfunction, encephalopathy, and death. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the type of stent (covered vs. bare metal). The random-effects model was used to calculate the relative risk (RR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of outcome. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: Eleven studies with a total of 1,075 patients were included (597: TIPS alone and 478: TIPS plus VE). Compared to the TIPS alone, the TIPS with VE had a significantly lower incidence of variceal rebleeding (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.43 - 0.81, P = 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed similar results in covered stents (RR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36 - 0.86, P = 0.008) but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the subgroup analysis of bare stents and combined stents. There was no significant difference in the risk of encephalopathy (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.66 - 1.06, P = 0.13), shunt dysfunction (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.64 - 1.19, P = 0.40), and death (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.65 - 1.17, P = 0.34). There were similarly no differences in these secondary outcomes between groups when stratified according to type of stent.
    UNASSIGNED: Adding VE to TIPS reduced the incidence of variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis. However, the benefit was observed with covered stents only. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号