transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定临床,程序,医院,以及经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)手术持续时间的医师特征。
    方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了在2005年1月至2020年8月期间接受初次TIPS手术的18岁以上患者。排除标准是在机构外执行TIPS并且TIPS安置失败。共包括154条记录。回归分析用于确定手术持续时间的预测因子。
    结果:TIPS安置的平均年龄为57岁。70%的患者为男性和非西班牙裔白人(80.5%)。TIPS程序的平均持续时间为169分钟(SD:78)。当肝硬化的病因是病毒性时,手术持续时间较短(平均:144分钟,SD:84,p=0.008);TIPS的原因是腹水(152,SD:66,p=0.01);并且该程序不需要额外的访问(153分钟,标准差:67,p=<0.0001)。手术持续时间的主要临床预测指标是基线胆红素(β系数(β):5.6分钟,p=0.0007)。在多变量线性模型中,在那些不需要额外访问的患者中,胆红素(β:4.9分钟,p=0.005),肝硬化的病因,和医师经验是TIPS手术持续时间的主要预测因素。基线胆红素对腹水组手术持续时间的影响增加(β:19.5分钟,p=0.006),特别是当不需要额外的访问时。
    结论:该研究表明基线胆红素,肝硬化的病因,和医生对TIPS程序持续时间的经验。基线胆红素与手术时间正相关的潜在机制可能与肝纤维化程度有关。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between clinical, procedural, hospital, and physician characteristics with the duration of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure.
    METHODS: This retrospective study included patients over 18 years of age who underwent an initial TIPS procedure between January 2005 and August 2020. Exclusion criteria were TIPS performed outside the institution and failed TIPS placement. A total of 154 records were included. Regression analyses were used to identify predictors of procedural duration.
    RESULTS: The mean age at TIPS placement was 57 years. Seventy percent of patients were male and non-Hispanic whites (80.5%). The mean duration of the TIPS procedure was 169 minutes (SD: 78). Procedural duration was shorter when the etiology of cirrhosis was viral (mean: 144 min, SD: 84, p=0.008); the reason for TIPS was ascites (152, SD: 66, p=0.01); and the procedure did not require additional access (153 min, SD: 67, p=<.0001). The main clinical predictor of procedural duration was baseline bilirubin (Beta coefficient (β): 5.6 min, p=0.0007). In multivariable linear models, in those patients that did not require additional access, bilirubin (β: 4.9 min, p=0.005), etiology of cirrhosis, and physician experience were the main predictors of TIPS procedure duration. The effect of baseline bilirubin on procedural duration increased in the ascites group (β: 19.5 minutes, p=0.006), especially when additional access was not required.
    CONCLUSIONS:  The study demonstrates an association between baseline bilirubin, etiology of cirrhosis, and physician experience with the duration of the TIPS procedure. The mechanism underlying the positive association between baseline bilirubin and procedural time is possibly related to the degree of liver fibrosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:TIPS后门腔压力梯度(PPG)的最佳测量时间和血流动力学目标仍无定论。这项研究旨在确定接受TIPS治疗静脉曲张破裂出血的患者的血液动力学测量的理想时刻和PPG的最佳目标。
    方法:在2018年5月至2021年12月之间,前瞻性纳入了466例接受覆盖式TIPS治疗的复发性静脉曲张破裂出血患者。TIPS后立即测量PPG(立即测量PPG),24-72小时(早期PPG),TIPS放置后1个月(PPG晚期)。通过类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman方法评估在不同时间点测量的PPG之间的一致性。PPG对临床结果的未调整和混杂调整的影响(门静脉高压并发症[PHC],明显的肝性脑病[OHE],进一步失代偿,和死亡)使用精细和灰色竞争风险回归模型进行评估。
    结果:早期PPG与晚期PPG(ICC:0.34)的一致性优于即刻PPG与晚期PPG(ICC:0.23,p<0.001)。早期PPG对PHC风险具有良好的预测价值(早期PPG≥vs<12mmHg:调整后的HR[95CI]:2.17[1.33-3.55],p=0.002)以及OHE(0.40[0.17-0.91],p=0.030),而立即PPG没有。晚期PPG对PHC风险有预测价值,但对OHE无预测价值。通过以进一步失代偿的最低风险为目标,我们确定了在早期PPG为11~14mmHg时的最佳血流动力学目标,该目标与OHE风险降低相关,同时有效预防PHC.
    结论:TIPS后24至72小时测量的PPG与长期PPG和临床结果相关,和PPG11-14mmHg的血流动力学目标可减少脑病,但不影响临床疗效。
    经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后门腔压力梯度(PPG)的最佳测量时机和血流动力学目标仍无定论。在这里,我们表明,TIPS后PPG测量至少24小时,但不是在手术后立即与长期PPG和临床事件相关。因此,应将其用于决策,以改善临床结局.在手术后24-72小时测量的11-14mmHg或从TIPS前基线相对减少20%-50%的TIPS后PPG减少脑病,但不损害临床疗效,因此可用于指导肝硬化和静脉曲张破裂出血患者行覆盖性TIPS的TIPS创建和翻修。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,ID:NCT03590288。
    OBJECTIVE: The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after TIPS remains inconclusive. This study aimed to identify the ideal moment of hemodynamic measurements and the optimal target of PPG in patients undergoing covered TIPS for variceal bleeding.
    METHODS: Between May 2018 and December 2021, 466 consecutive patients with recurrent variceal bleeding treated with covered TIPS were prospectively included. Post-TIPS PPG were measured immediately (immediate PPG), 24-72 hours (early PPG), and again 1 month (late PPG) after TIPS placement. The agreement among PPGs measured at different time points was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method. The unadjusted and confounder-adjusted effects of PPGs on the clinical outcomes (portal hypertension complications [PHC], overt hepatic encephalopathy [OHE], further decompensation, and death) were assessed using Fine and Gray competing risk regression models.
    RESULTS: The agreement between early PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.34) was better than that between immediate PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.23, p<0.001). Early PPG revealed an excellent predictive value for PHC risk (early PPG ≥ vs <12 mmHg: adjusted HR [95%CI]: 2.17 [1.33-3.55], p=0.002) as well as OHE (0.40 [0.17-0.91], p=0.030) while immediate PPG did not. Late PPG showed a predictive value for PHC risk but not OHE. By targeting the lowest risk of further decompensation, we identified an optimal hemodynamic target with early PPG ranging 11 to 14 mmHg that was associated with a decreased risk of OHE while effectively preventing PHC.
    CONCLUSIONS: PPG measured 24 to 72 hours after TIPS correlates with long term PPG and clinical outcomes, and hemodynamic target with a PPG 11-14 mmHg reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy.
    UNASSIGNED: The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) remains inconclusive. Here we show that post-TIPS PPG measured at least 24 hours but not immediately after the procedure correlated with long-term PPG and clinical events, therefore should be used for decision making in order to improve clinical outcomes. Targeting post-TIPS PPG at 11-14 mmHg or 20%-50% relative reduction from pre-TIPS baseline that measured 24-72 hours after procedure reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy, therefore could be used to guide TIPS creation and revision in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding undergoing covered TIPS.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03590288.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹水,肝硬化的严重并发症,显着影响患者的发病率和死亡率,尤其是黑人患者。已提出获得疾病优化护理作为这种差异的潜在驱动因素。在这项研究中,我们评估跨种族和族裔群体的TIPS利用率。
    方法:我们检查了连续D部分覆盖的20%美国医疗保险参保者的随机样本数据。我们需要在肝硬化诊断前连续门诊登记180天,所有患者在肝硬化诊断180天内有≥1次穿刺。时间零点是第一次穿刺的日期。我们评估了TIPS放置的可能性。进行分析以确定每个结果与种族/民族之间的独立关联。
    结果:5915例患者(平均年龄68.2,64.4%为男性)纳入分析。439名(7.4%)患者被确定为黑人,223(3.8%)为西班牙裔,和4942(83.6%)为白色。在多变量分析中与白人患者相比,黑人患者接受TIPS手术的可能性较小(风险比0.4;95%置信区间(CI)0.2-0.8),并且在医院外存活的天数较少(-100.5;95%CI-189.4--11.6)。种族和种族之间的无移植生存率或每年的平行数没有显着差异。
    结论:Black患者在控制常见患者和疾病特异性变量时,接受TIPS程序的可能性较小。获得最佳的专业服务可能是种族和族裔之间肝硬化患者结果差异的重要驱动因素。
    BACKGROUND: Ascites, a severe complication of cirrhosis, significantly impacts patient morbidity and mortality especially in Black patients. Access to disease optimizing care has been proposed as a potential driver of this disparity. In this study, we evaluate TIPS utilization across racial and ethnic groups.
    METHODS: We examined data from a 20% random sample of US Medicare enrollees with continuous Part D coverage. We required 180 days of continuous outpatient enrollment prior to cirrhosis diagnosis and all patients had ≥1 paracentesis within 180 days of their cirrhosis diagnosis. Time zero was the date of the first paracentesis. We assessed the likelihood of TIPS placement. Analyses were conducted to determine the independent associations between each outcome and race/ethnicity.
    RESULTS: 5915 patients (average age 68.2, 64.4% male) were included in the analysis. 439 (7.4%) patients were identified as Black, 223 (3.8%) as Hispanic, and 4942 (83.6%) as white. When compared to white patients in a multivariable analysis, Black patients were less likely to receive a TIPS procedure (hazard ratio 0.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.8) and had less days alive outside of the hospital (-100.5; 95% CI -189.4 - -11.6). There were no significant differences in transplant-free survival or number of paracenteses per year between ethnic and racial groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Black patients are less likely to receive a TIPS procedure when controlling for common patient- and disease-specific variables. Access to optimal specialized services may be a significant driver for disparities in outcomes of patients with cirrhosis between racial and ethnic groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:难治性肝性脑病(RHE)可能是经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后过度分流的结果。我们描述了一种利用缝线受限覆膜支架进行分流减少治疗TIPS相关RHE的技术。
    方法:在2017年1月至2023年9月之间,回顾了25例TIPS相关RHE患者,这些患者使用缝线受限覆膜支架进行了分流减少术。该程序包括用不可吸收的缝合线将聚四氟乙烯覆盖的支架的直径从8毫米减小到5毫米,并将其插入现有的TIPS支架中以减少分流。
    结果:对25例患者中的12例进行了评估。在所有患者中,分流术在技术上都是成功的,并且没有观察到与手术相关的立即并发症。分流减少后HE症状有不同程度的改善。与术前相比,门体系统梯度平均增加5mmHg,7例(58.3%)患者症状完全消失。在中位随访8.3个月后,HE复发4例(33.3%),TIPS指征复发2例(16.7%),以腹水和静脉曲张破裂出血。分别。一名患者(8.3%)出现了通过多普勒超声检测到的分流功能障碍,并伴有肝胸积水和腹水。在研究结束时,5例患者(41.7%)存活,5(41.7%)死于肝功能衰竭,2人(16.7%)死于肺炎。
    结论:用缝线限制支架直径是可行的,使用这种缝线约束覆膜支架进行分流减少术可以有效改善TIPS相关的RHE。有必要进行进一步的研究,以精确描绘门体系统梯度增加的影响并优化患者的生存率。
    OBJECTIVE: Refractory hepatic encephalopathy (RHE) can occur as a consequence of excessive shunting following the creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). We describe a technique that utilizes a suture-constrained covered stent for shunt reduction to treat TIPS-related RHE.
    METHODS: Between January 2017 and September 2023, 25 patients with TIPS-related RHE who underwent shunt reduction utilizing a suture-constrained covered stent were reviewed. The procedure involved reducing the diameter of a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent from 8 to 5 mm with a non-absorbable suture and inserting it into the existing TIPS stent to reduce shunt flow.
    RESULTS: Twelve of the 25 patients were evaluated. Shunt reduction was technically successful in all patients and no immediate complications related to the procedures were observed. Varying degrees of improvement in HE symptoms were observed after shunt reduction, with a mean increase in portosystemic gradient of 5 mmHg compared to pre-procedure, and complete disappearance of symptoms was observed in seven (58.3%) individuals. After a median follow-up of 8.3 months, HE recurred in 4 patients (33.3%) and TIPS indication recurred in 2 patients (16.7%) in the form of ascites and variceal bleeding, respectively. One patient (8.3%) developed shunt dysfunction detected by Doppler ultrasound and was accompanied by the presence of hepatic hydrothorax and ascites. At the end of the study, 5 patients (41.7%) were alive, 5 (41.7%) succumbed to liver failure, and 2 (16.7%) succumbed to pneumonia.
    CONCLUSIONS: Constraining the stent diameter with a suture is feasible, and using this suture-constrained covered stent for shunt reduction can effectively improve TIPS-related RHE. Further investigations are warranted to precisely delineate the impact of the increased portosystemic gradient and to optimize patient survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为患者提供接受治愈性经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的机会,而不是对门脉高压相关的静脉曲张出血和腹水的姑息性治疗,我们旨在评估肝相关血管形态改变,以提高对明显肝性脑病(HE)风险的预测准确性.
    方法:在这项多中心研究中,621名接受TIPS的患者被细分为培训(来自3家医院的413例)和外部验证数据集(来自另外3家医院的208例)。除了传统的临床因素,我们使用最大直径(包括绝对值和比值)评估肝脏相关血管形态变化.三种预测模型(临床,肝相关血管,并结合)使用逻辑回归构建。比较了它们的辨别和校准,以测试肝相关血管评估的必要性并确定最佳模型。此外,为了验证ModelC-V的改进性能,我们将它与以前的四种型号进行了比较,在辨别和校准方面。
    结果:组合模型优于临床和肝相关血管模型(训练:0.814、0.754、0.727;验证:0.781、0.679、0.776;p<0.050),并且具有最佳校准。与以前的型号相比,ModelC-V在辨别方面表现优异。高,middle-,低危人群显示明显不同的HE发生率(p<0.001)。尽管TIPS前氨预测明显HE风险的能力有限,组合模型显示出令人满意的预测显性HE风险的能力,在低氨和高氨亚组。
    结论:肝相关血管评估提高了显性HE的预测准确性,通过TIPS确保合适患者的治愈机会,并为肝硬化相关研究提供见解。
    BACKGROUND: To provide patients the chance of accepting curative transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) rather than palliative treatments for portal hypertension-related variceal bleeding and ascites, we aimed to assess hepatic-associated vascular morphological change to improve the predictive accuracy of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) risks.
    METHODS: In this multicenter study, 621 patients undergoing TIPS were subdivided into training (413 cases from 3 hospitals) and external validation datasets (208 cases from another 3 hospitals). In addition to traditional clinical factors, we assessed hepatic-associated vascular morphological changes using maximum diameter (including absolute and ratio values). Three predictive models (clinical, hepatic-associated vascular, and combined) were constructed using logistic regression. Their discrimination and calibration were compared to test the necessity of hepatic-associated vascular assessment and identify the optimal model. Furthermore, to verify the improved performance of ModelC-V, we compared it with four previous models, both in discrimination and calibration.
    RESULTS: The combined model outperformed the clinical and hepatic-associated vascular models (training: 0.814, 0.754, 0.727; validation: 0.781, 0.679, 0.776; p < 0.050) and had the best calibration. Compared to previous models, ModelC-V showed superior performance in discrimination. The high-, middle-, and low-risk populations displayed significantly different overt HE incidence (p < 0.001). Despite the limited ability of pre-TIPS ammonia to predict overt HE risks, the combined model displayed a satisfactory ability to predict overt HE risks, both in the low- and high-ammonia subgroups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic-associated vascular assessment improved the predictive accuracy of overt HE, ensuring curative chances by TIPS for suitable patients and providing insights for cirrhosis-related studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)对吡咯里西定生物碱(PA)引起的肝窦阻塞综合征(HSOS)患者的临床结果和肝组织学的影响,并将这些结果与单独接受支持治疗的患者的结果进行比较。
    从2015年6月至2022年8月,回顾性纳入了6个三级护理中心的164例PA-HSOS患者,并将其分为TIPS组(n=69)和支持治疗(ST)组(n=95)。主要终点是确定TIPS放置是否可以改善PA-HSOS患者的生存率。在这项研究中还评估了与门静脉高压相关的临床症状。此外,一个由7例患者组成的小TIPS亚组在TIPS前后接受了肝活检以进行组织学分析.
    TIPS组的死亡发生率明显低于ST组(log-rankp=0.026)。多变量Cox模型显示组分配(风险比(HR)5.146;95%置信区间(CI)1.587-16.687;p=0.006),总胆红素(HR1.029;95%CI1.020-1.038;p<0.001),INR(HR13.291;95%CI3.637-48.566;p<0.001)是死亡率的独立预测因子。此外,TIPS放置降低了与门静脉高压相关的并发症的风险,但并未增加明显的肝性脑病的发生率(log-rankp=0.731)。此外,接受肝活检的7名TIPS患者中有6名在TIPS放置后有所改善,一名患者出现纤维化.
    TIPS的放置降低了死亡率和门静脉高压症相关并发症的风险。少数患者的组织学评估显示了TIPS的潜在改善。
    UNASSIGNED: To assess the impact of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on clinical outcomes and liver histology in patients with hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HSOS) caused by pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PA), and compare these results with those of patients who received supportive treatment alone.
    UNASSIGNED: From June 2015 to August 2022, 164 patients diagnosed with PA-HSOS in six tertiary care centers were retrospectively included in this study and divided into TIPS group (n = 69) and supportive treatment (ST) group (n = 95). The main endpoint was to determine whether TIPS placement could improve survival in PA-HSOS patients. The clinical symptoms associated with portal hypertension were also evaluated in this study. Additionally, a small TIPS-subgroup of 7 patients received liver biopsies before and after TIPS for histological analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of death was markedly lower in the TIPS group than in the ST group (log-rank p = 0.026). Multivariate Cox model revealed that group assignment (hazard ratio (HR) 5.146; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.587-16.687; p = 0.006), total bilirubin (HR 1.029; 95 % CI 1.020-1.038; p < 0.001), and INR (HR 13.291; 95 % CI 3.637-48.566; p < 0.001) were independent predictors for mortality. In addition, TIPS placement reduced the risk of complications associated with portal hypertension but did not increase the rate of overt hepatic encephalopathy (log-rank p = 0.731). Furthermore, six of 7 TIPS patients receiving liver biopsies improved after TIPS placement, and one patient developed fibrosis.
    UNASSIGNED: TIPS placement decreased the mortality and risk of complications associated with portal hypertension. Histological evaluation in a few patients showed a potential improvement by TIPS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在中国患者中使用Viatorr支架的经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的中长期疗效和安全性数据有限。本研究旨在评估Viatorr支架插入后5年死亡率和明显肝性脑病(OHE)的发生率,并构建预测TIPS术后OHE的模型。
    方法:纳入了2016年8月至2019年12月在我们机构接受Viatorr支架插入的123例患者,并以70/30的比例随机分为训练和验证队列。患者随访至死亡或随访结束日期(12月31日,2021)。主要终点是全因死亡率,次要终点是OHE,静脉曲张再出血,复发性腹水和分流功能障碍。
    结果:1-,2-,3-,4年和5年累积生存率为92.4%,87.9%,85.3%,80.2%和80.2%,分别。TIPS术后OHE和Child-Pugh分级是独立的预后因素。静脉曲张再出血的发生率,复发性腹水,分流功能障碍和TIPS术后OHE为9.1%,14.3%,5.3%和28.0%,分别。预测TIPS后OHE的列线图变量包括年龄,糖尿病和腹水等级。训练和验证队列中时间依赖性受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.806和0.751。决策曲线分析(DCA)在训练和验证队列中均显示出良好的净收益。
    结论:TIPS后OHE和Child-Pugh分级是肝硬化患者早期死亡的独立预后因素,因此,我们构建了一个简单方便的TIPS术后OHE预测模型,用于术前识别高危患者.
    Data on medium- and long-term efficacy and safety of Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using Viatorr stents in Chinese patients are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the 5-year mortality and the incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) after Viatorr stent insertion, and construct a model to predict post-TIPS OHE preoperatively.
    One hundred thirty-two patients undergoing Viatorr stent insertion in our institution between August 2016 and December 2019 were included, and randomly divided into training and validation cohort at a 70/30 ratio. Patients were followed up until death or the end date of follow-up (December 31st, 2021). The primary end point was all-cause mortality, and the secondary end points were OHE, variceal rebleeding, recurrent ascites and shunt dysfunction.
    The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 92.4%, 87.9%, 85.3%, 80.2% and 80.2%, respectively. Post-TIPS OHE and Child-Pugh grade were independent prognostic factors. The rates of variceal rebleeding, recurrent ascites, shunt dysfunction and post-TIPS OHE were 9.1%, 14.3%, 5.3% and 28.0%, respectively. The variables of nomogram predicting post-TIPS OHE included age, diabetes and ascites grade. The area under time-dependent receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) in training and validation cohort were 0.806 and 0.751, respectively. The decision curve analysis (DCA) showed good net benefit both in training and validation cohort.
    Post-TIPS OHE and Child-Pugh grade are independent prognostic factors for early mortality in cirrhosis patients, thus we construct a simple and convenient prediction model for post-TIPS OHE to identify high-risk patients preoperatively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:术前应预测肝性脑病(HE),以确定经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的合适候选者,而不是一线治疗。本研究旨在构建基于3D评估的模型来预测TIPS后的显性HE。
    方法:在这项多中心队列研究中,487名接受TIPS的患者被细分为训练数据集(来自三家医院的390例)和外部验证数据集(来自另外两家医院的97例)。候选因素包括临床,血管,以及2D和3D数据。结合最小绝对收缩和算子方法,支持向量机,和等渗回归的概率校准,我们构建了四个预测模型:临床,2D,3D,和组合模型。将它们的辨别和校准进行比较,以确定最佳模型,进行亚组分析。
    结果:3D模型显示出比2D模型更好的辨别力(训练:0.719vs.0.691;验证:0.730vs.0.622)。结合临床和3D因素的模型优于临床和3D模型(训练:0.802vs.0.735vs.0.719;验证:0.816与0.723vs.0.730;所有p<0.050)。此外,组合模型具有最佳的校准。最佳模型的性能不受总胆红素水平的影响,Child-Pugh评分,氨水平,或提示指示。
    结论:肝脏和脾脏的3D评估提供了额外的信息来预测明显的HE,改善适合患者的TIPS机会。3D评估也可用于与肝硬化相关的类似研究。
    BACKGROUND: Overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) should be predicted preoperatively to identify suitable candidates for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) instead of first-line treatment. This study aimed to construct a 3D assessment-based model to predict post-TIPS overt HE.
    METHODS: In this multi-center cohort study, 487 patients who underwent TIPS were subdivided into a training dataset (390 cases from three hospitals) and an external validation dataset (97 cases from another two hospitals). Candidate factors included clinical, vascular, and 2D and 3D data. Combining the least absolute shrinkage and operator method, support vector machine, and probability calibration by isotonic regression, we constructed four predictive models: clinical, 2D, 3D, and combined models. Their discrimination and calibration were compared to identify the optimal model, with subgroup analysis performed.
    RESULTS: The 3D model showed better discrimination than did the 2D model (training: 0.719 vs. 0.691; validation: 0.730 vs. 0.622). The model combining clinical and 3D factors outperformed the clinical and 3D models (training: 0.802 vs. 0.735 vs. 0.719; validation: 0.816 vs. 0.723 vs. 0.730; all p < 0.050). Moreover, the combined model had the best calibration. The performance of the best model was not affected by the total bilirubin level, Child-Pugh score, ammonia level, or the indication for TIPS.
    CONCLUSIONS: 3D assessment of the liver and the spleen provided additional information to predict overt HE, improving the chance of TIPS for suitable patients. 3D assessment could also be used in similar studies related to cirrhosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目的:BavenoVII研讨会建议,肝硬化合并非恶性门静脉血栓形成(PVT)患者的急性静脉曲张出血(AVB)的治疗应按照指南进行。然而,PVT是否影响肝硬化和AVB患者的预后尚不清楚.这项研究的目的是评估PVT对先发制人TIPSS符合条件的肝硬化和AVB患者预后的临床影响。
    方法:从2010年12月至2016年6月,1219例因AVB合并(n=151;12.4%)或无PVT(n=1068;87.6%)而连续入院的肝硬化患者,谁接受了药物加内窥镜治疗(血管活性药物的组合,抗生素,AVB的内镜结扎术,随后是β受体阻滞剂加静脉曲张结扎术以预防再出血)。在调整潜在的混杂因素后,采用精细和灰色竞争风险回归模型来评估PVT对临床结局的影响。
    结果:随访期间,211例患者(17.3%)死亡,490(40.2%)经历了进一步的出血,78例(6.4%)在1年内出现新的或恶化的腹水。与没有PVT的相比,PVT患者的死亡风险相似(PVTvs无PVT:1年时19.9%vs16.7%;校正HR0.88,95CI0.51-1.52,p=0.653),进一步出血(47.0%vs39.2%在1年,调整后的HR1.19,95%CI0.92-1.53,p=183),和新的或恶化的腹水(7.9%对9.6%,调整后的HR0.70,95%CI0.39-1.28,p=0.253)。这些发现在不同的相关亚组之间是一致的,并通过倾向评分匹配分析得到证实。
    结论:我们的研究表明,在接受标准治疗的肝硬化AVB患者中,PVT与预后改善或恶化相关。
    OBJECTIVE: Baveno VII workshop recommends management of acute variceal bleeding (AVB) in cirrhotic patients with nonmalignant portal vein thrombosis (PVT) should be performed according to the guidelines for patients without PVT. Nevertheless, whether PVT affects the outcome of patients with cirrhosis and AVB remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of PVT on the outcomes in the pre-emptive TIPSS eligible patients with cirrhosis and AVB.
    METHODS: From December 2010 to June 2016, 1219 consecutive cirrhotic patients admitted due to AVB with (n = 151; 12.4%) or without PVT (n = 1068; 87.6%), who received drug plus endoscopic treatment (a combination of vasoactive drugs, antibiotics, and endoscopic ligation for AVB, followed by beta-blockers plus variceal ligation for prevention of rebleeding) were retrospectively included. Fine and Gray competing risk regression models were taken to evaluate the impact of PVT on clinical outcomes after adjusting for potential confounders.
    RESULTS: During follow-up, 211 patients (17.3%) died, 490 (40.2%) experienced further bleeding, and 78 (6.4%) experienced new or worsening ascites within 1 year. Compared with those without PVT, patients with PVT had a similar risk of mortality (PVT vs no-PVT: 19.9% vs 16.7% at 1 year; adjusted HR 0.88, 95%CI 0.51-1.52, p = 0.653), further bleeding (47.0% vs 39.2% at 1 year, adjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.92-1.53, p = 183), and new or worsening ascites (7.9% vs 9.6%, adjusted HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.39-1.28, p = 0.253) after adjusting for confounders in multivariable models. These findings were consistent across different relevant subgroups and confirmed by propensity score matching analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed no evidence that the PVT was associated with an improved or worsened outcome among cirrhotic patients with AVB who received standard treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    背景:肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)是诊断门静脉高压(PH)的金标准,测量过程中的侵入性和潜在风险限制了其广泛使用。
    目的:为了研究PH中计算机断层扫描(CT)灌注参数与HVPG的相关性,并定量评估经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)前后肝脾实质的血供变化。
    方法:本研究招募了24例PH相关性消化道出血患者,所有患者均在2周内进行TIPS手术前后的灌注CT检查。CT灌注定量参数,包括肝血容量(LBV),肝血流量(LBF),肝动脉分数(HAF),脾血容量(SBV)和脾血流量(SBF),在TIPS之前和之后进行测量和比较,并比较了临床上有意义的PH(CSPH)和非CSPH(NCSPH)组之间的定量参数。然后分析CT灌注参数与HVPG的相关性,有统计学意义为P<0.05。
    结果:对于TIPS后的所有24名PH患者,CT灌注参数显示LBV下降,增加HAF,SBV和SBF,LBF无统计学差异。与NCSPH相比,CSPH显示较高的HAF,其他CT灌注参数无差异。TIPS前HAF与HVPG呈正相关(r=0.530,P=0.008),而其他CT灌注参数与HVPG和Child-Pugh评分无相关性。
    结论:HAF,CT灌注指数,与HVPG呈正相关,CSPH高于TIPS前的NCSPH。虽然增加了HAF,SBF和SBV,降低了LBV,是在TIPS之后发现的,这是一种潜在的非侵入性成像工具,用于评估PH。
    BACKGROUND: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for diagnosis of portal hypertension (PH), invasiveness and potential risks in the process of measurement limited its widespread use.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation of computed tomography (CT) perfusion parameters with HVPG in PH, and quantitatively assess the blood supply changes in liver and spleen parenchyma before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).
    METHODS: Twenty-four PH related gastrointestinal bleeding patients were recruited in this study, and all patients were performed perfusion CT before and after TIPS surgery within 2 wk. Quantitative parameters of CT perfusion, including liver blood volume (LBV), liver blood flow (LBF), hepatic arterial fraction (HAF), spleen blood volume (SBV) and spleen blood flow (SBF), were measured and compared before and after TIPS, and the quantitative parameters between clinically significant PH (CSPH) and non-CSPH (NCSPH) group were also compared. Then the correlation of CT perfusion parameters with HVPG were analyzed, with statistical significance as P < 0.05.
    RESULTS: For all 24 PH patients after TIPS, CT perfusion parameters demonstrated decreased LBV, increased HAF, SBV and SBF, with no statistical difference in LBF. Compared with NCSPH, CSPH showed higher HAF, with no difference in other CT perfusion parameters. HAF before TIPS showed positive correlation with HVPG (r = 0.530, P = 0.008), while no correlation was found in other CT perfusion parameters with HVPG and Child-Pugh scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: HAF, an index of CT perfusion, was positive correlation with HVPG, and higher in CSPH than NCSPH before TIPS. While increased HAF, SBF and SBV, and decreased LBV, were found after TIPS, which accommodates a potential non-invasive imaging tool for evaluation of PH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号