Oesophageal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF) is a common congenital digestive disease. Patients with EA-TEF face gastrointestinal, surgical, respiratory, otolaryngological, nutritional, psychological and quality of life issues in childhood, adolescence and adulthood. Although consensus guidelines exist for the management of gastrointestinal, nutritional, surgical and respiratory problems in childhood, a systematic approach to the care of these patients in adolescence, during transition to adulthood and in adulthood is currently lacking. The Transition Working Group of the International Network on Oesophageal Atresia (INoEA) was charged with the task of developing uniform evidence-based guidelines for the management of complications through the transition from adolescence into adulthood. Forty-two questions addressing the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of gastrointestinal, surgical, respiratory, otolaryngological, nutritional, psychological and quality of life complications that patients with EA-TEF face during adolescence and after the transition to adulthood were formulated. A systematic literature search was performed based on which recommendations were made. All recommendations were discussed and finalized during consensus meetings, and the group members voted on each recommendation. Expert opinion was used when no randomized controlled trials were available to support the recommendation. The list of the 42 statements, all based on expert opinion, was voted on and agreed upon.

A cognitive aid is a tool used to help people accurately and efficiently perform actions. Similarly themed cognitive aids may be collated into a manual to provide relevant information for a specific context (eg, operating room emergencies). Expert content and design are paramount to facilitate the utility of a cognitive aid, especially during a crisis when accessible memory may be limited and distractions may impair task completion. A cognitive aid does not represent a rigid approach to problem-solving or a replacement for decision-making. Successful cognitive aid implementation requires dedicated training, access, and culture integration. Here the authors present a set of evidence-based cognitive aids for thoracic anesthesia emergencies developed by a Canadian thoracic taskforce.

暂无摘要。

Esophageal atresia (EA) is a congenital anomaly that entails an interrupted esophagus with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). Depending on the distance of the two esophageal pouches a \"short-gap\" is distinguished from a \"long-gap\" variant. Up to 50% of newborns have additional anomalies. EA is prenatally diagnosed in 32-63% of cases. Recently, the interdisciplinary care in these children underwent substantial changes. Therefore, we summarize the current guideline of the German society of pediatric surgery for the treatment of patients with EA and distal TEF (Gross Type C). Controversies regarding the perioperative management include surgical-technical aspects, such as the thoracoscopic approach to EA, as well as general anesthesia (preoperative tracheobronchoscopy, intraoperative hypercapnia and acidosis). Moreover, postoperative complications and their management like anastomotic stricture are outlined. Despite significant improvements in the treatment of EA, there is still a relevant amount of long-term morbidity after surgical correction. This includes dysmotility of the esophagus, gastroesophageal reflux disease, recurrent respiratory infections, tracheomalacia, failure to thrive, and orthopedic complications following thoracotomy in the neonatal age. Therefore, close follow-up is mandatory to attain optimal quality of life.
Die Ösophagusatresie (ÖA) ist eine angeborene Kontinuitätsunterbrechung der Speiseröhre mit oder ohne Fistel zur Trachea (Tracheoösophageale Fistel, TÖF). Je nach Abstand zwischen den beiden Ösophagusenden unterscheidet man eine „kurzstreckige“ von einer „langstreckigen“ Form. Bis zu 50% der Neugeborenen weisen weitere Anomalien auf. Eine pränatale Diagnose der ÖA gelingt in 32–63% der Fälle. Die interdisziplinäre Betreuung dieser Kinder hat sich in den letzten Jahren gewandelt. In der folgenden Arbeit wird die aktuelle S2K-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderchirurgie zur Behandlung der ÖA mit unterer TÖF, die etwa 90% aller Fälle ausmacht, zusammengefasst. Hierzu gehören das präoperative Management sowie operative und anästhesiologische Aspekte (u. a. Thorakoskopie vs. Thorakotomie, präoperative Tracheobronchoskopie, intraoperative Hyperkapnie und Azidose). Ferner wird das postoperative Management insbesondere von relevanten Komplikationen wie der Anastomosenstenose beschrieben. Trotz Fortschritten in der Behandlung der ÖA ist die Langzeitmorbidität mit Motilitätsstörungen des Ösophagus, gastroösophagealer Refluxkrankheit, rezidivierenden Infektionen der oberen und unteren Atemwege, Tracheomalazie, mangelhaftem Gedeihen sowie orthopädischen Problemen nach Thorakotomie weiterhin hoch. Zum Erreichen einer guten Lebensqualität ist daher eine gute interdisziplinäre Nachsorge wichtig.

BACKGROUND:  Improvements in care of patients with esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) have shifted the focus from mortality to morbidity and quality-of-life. Long-term follow-up is essential, but evidence is limited and standardized protocols are scarce. Nineteen representatives of the European Reference Network for Rare Inherited Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) from nine European countries conducted a consensus conference on the surgical management of EA/TEF.
METHODS:  The conference was prepared by item generation (including items of surgical relevance from the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)-The North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) guidelines on follow-up after EA repair), item prioritization, formulation of a final list containing the domains Follow-up and Framework, and literature review. Anonymous voting was conducted via an internet-based system. Consensus was defined as ≥75% of those voting with scores of 6 to 9.
RESULTS:  Twenty-five items were generated in the domain Follow-up of which 17 (68%) matched with corresponding ESPGHAN-NASPGHAN statements. Complete consensus (100%) was achieved on seven items (28%), such as the necessity of an interdisciplinary follow-up program. Consensus ≥75% was achieved on 18 items (72%), such as potential indications for fundoplication. There was an 82% concordance with the ESPGHAN-NASPGHAN recommendations. Four items were generated in the domain Framework, and complete consensus was achieved on all these items.
CONCLUSIONS:  Participants of the first ERNICA conference reached significant consensus on the follow-up of patients with EA/TEF who undergo primary anastomosis. Fundamental statements regarding centralization, multidisciplinary approach, and involvement of patient organizations were formulated. These consensus statements will provide the cornerstone for uniform treatment protocols and resultant optimized patient care.

BACKGROUND:  Many aspects of the management of esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) are controversial and the evidence for decision making is limited. Members of the European Reference Network for Rare Inherited Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) conducted a consensus conference on the surgical management of EA/TEF based on expert opinions referring to the latest literature.
METHODS:  Nineteen ERNICA representatives from nine European countries participated in the conference. The conference was prepared by item generation, item prioritization by online survey, formulation of a final list containing the domains diagnostics, preoperative, operative, and postoperative management, and literature review. The 2-day conference was held in Berlin in October 2018. Anonymous voting was conducted via an internet-based system. Consensus was defined when 75% of the votes scored 6 to 9.
RESULTS:  Fifty-two items were generated with 116 relevant articles of which five studies (4.3%) were assigned as level-1evidence. Complete consensus (100%) was achieved on 20 items (38%), such as TEF closure by transfixing suture, esophageal anastomosis by interrupted sutures, and initiation of feeding 24 hours postoperatively. Consensus ≥75% was achieved on 37 items (71%), such as routine insertion of transanastomotic tube or maximum duration of thoracoscopy of 3 hours. Thirteen items (25%) were controversial (range of scores, 1-9). Eight of these (62%) did not reach consensus.
CONCLUSIONS:  Participants of the conference reached significant consensus on the management of patients with EA/TEF. The consensus may facilitate standardization and development of generally accepted guidelines. The conference methodology may serve as a blueprint for further conferences on the management of congenital malformations in pediatric surgery.

Esophageal atresia (EA) is one of the most common congenital digestive anomalies. With improvements in surgical techniques and intensive care treatments, the focus of care of these patients has shifted from mortality to morbidity and quality-of-life issues. These children face gastrointestinal (GI) problems not only in early childhood but also through adolescence and adulthood. There is, however, currently a lack of a systematic approach to the care of these patients. The GI working group of International Network on Esophageal Atresia comprises members from ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN and was charged with the task of developing uniform evidence-based guidelines for the management of GI complications in children with EA.
Thirty-six clinical questions addressing the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of the common GI complications in patients with EA were formulated. Questions on the diagnosis, and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux, management of \"cyanotic spells,\" etiology, investigation and management of dysphagia, feeding difficulties, anastomotic strictures, congenital esophageal stenosis in EA patients were addressed. The importance of excluding eosinophilic esophagitis and associated GI anomalies in symptomatic patients with EA is discussed as is the quality of life of these patients and the importance of a systematic transition of care to adulthood. A systematic literature search was performed from inception to March 2014 using Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, and PsychInfo databases. The approach of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was applied to evaluate outcomes. During 2 consensus meetings, all recommendations were discussed and finalized. The group members voted on each recommendation, using the nominal voting technique. Expert opinion was used where no randomized controlled trials were available to support the recommendation.