OBJECTIVE: What is the risk of an undetected natural conception pregnancy during luteal phase ovarian stimulation, and how does it impact the pregnancy\'s course?
CONCLUSIONS: The risk for an undetected, natural conception pregnancy in luteal phase ovarian stimulation is low and it appears that ovarian stimulation is unlikely to harm the pregnancy.
BACKGROUND: Random start ovarian stimulation appears to be similarly effective as early follicular stimulation start; and it allows ovarian stimulation to be started independent of the cycle day and throughout the cycle, in accordance with the patients\' and clinics\' schedule as long as there is no intention of a fresh embryo transfer in the same cycle. Starting ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase bears the possibility of an-at the timepoint of stimulation start-undetected, natural conception pregnancy that has already occurred. There is scarce data on the incidence of this event as well as on the possible implications of ovarian stimulation on the course of an existing pregnancy.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study, performed between June 2017 and January 2024, analyzed luteal phase stimulations, in which a natural conception pregnancy was detected during the ovarian stimulation treatment for IVF/ICSI. Luteal phase stimulation was defined as ovarian stimulation started after ovulation and before the next expected menstrual bleeding, with a serum progesterone (P4) level of >1.5 ng/ml on the day of stimulation start or 1 day before.
METHODS: Women who underwent a luteal phase ovarian stimulation in a tertiary referral ART center.
RESULTS: A total of 488 luteal phase stimulation cycles were included in the analysis. Luteal phase stimulation was only started after a negative serum hCG measurement on the day or 1 day before commencement of ovarian stimulation. Ten patients (2.1%) had an undetected natural conception pregnancy at the time of luteal phase stimulation start. Eight of these patients underwent an ovarian stimulation in a GnRH-antagonist protocol and two in a progestin-primed stimulation protocol (PPOS). Recombinant FSH was used as stimulation medication for all patients, the patients with a PPOS protocol received additional recombinant LH. One pregnancy (0.2%) was detected after the oocyte retrieval, the other nine pregnancies were detected either due to persistent high serum progesterone levels or due to an increasing progesterone level after an initial decrease before oocyte retrieval. In the cycles with an undetected natural conception pregnancy, the median number of stimulation days was 8 days (range: 6-11 days) and median serum hCG at detection of pregnancy was 59 IU hCG (range: 14.91-183.1). From 10 patients with a pregnancy, three patients delivered a healthy baby, two patients had ongoing pregnancies at the time of summarizing the data, three patients had biochemical pregnancies (patient age: 30, 39, and 42 years), one patient had an ectopic pregnancy which required a salpingectomy, and one patient (age: 34 years) had an early pregnancy loss.
CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective study design and the small sample size can limit the accuracy of the estimates.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there is a small risk of undetected natural conception pregnancies when luteal phase stimulation is undertaken. It appears that there are no adverse effects through either direct effect on the embryo or indirectly through a detrimental effect on the corpus luteum function on the pregnancy in our cohort.
BACKGROUND: This study did not receive funding. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
BACKGROUND: N/A.

UNASSIGNED: Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS) is a rare congenital disorder of craniofacial development characterized by numerous developmental anomalies that are restricted to the head and neck. Most TCS cases are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. The diagnosis of TCS relies on clinical and radiographic findings. The four genes involved in TCS are TCOF1, POLR1D, POLR1C, and POLR1B.
UNASSIGNED: In this report, we present the case of a 7-year-old Moroccan boy who exhibited distinctive dysmorphic features, including coloboma and zygomatic bone hypoplasia. Upon genetic analysis, a mutation in the TCOF1 gene was identified, conclusively confirming the presence of Treacher Collins Syndrome. It is worthy that the correct etiological diagnosis was significantly delayed due to the initial misperception that the observed malformation syndrome was a result of drug teratogenicity.
UNASSIGNED: This case highlights the importance of seeking pharmacovigilance advice if any adverse event occurs following medication use. Furthermore, requesting a genetic consultation to establish a confirmed etiological diagnosis for any malformation syndrome can significantly reduce the protracted social and psychological suffering that patients and their families may endure.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited safety data on the use of everolimus during pregnancy. In this study, we present the maternal and neonatal outcomes of everolimus used throughout the course of pregnancy and conducted a systematic review of reports of everolimus use after organ transplantation during pregnancy.
METHODS: A woman with type 1 diabetes who underwent kidney transplantation was treated with tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone. Two years later, she became pregnant. At 27 weeks of gestation, an emergent cesarean delivery was performed owing to severe preeclampsia and fetal distress. No congenital malformation was noted in the baby at a corrected age of 4 months, and the maternal renal function remained stable.
CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review did not identify evidence of teratogenicity in babies exposed to everolimus as an immunosuppressant after transplantation. To better assess the risk of exposure to everolimus during pregnancy, all cases of new pregnancies occurring in transplant recipients receiving treatment with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor inhibitors should be reported.

Lacosamide is a novel antiepileptic drug. Although many antiepileptic drugs reportedly pose a risk to fetuses, patients with epilepsy are advised to continue their medications during pregnancy. There have been few reports on lacosamide use during pregnancy, and its effects on the fetus remain unclear. Here, we report a case of lacosamide use during pregnancy. The 33-year-old patient was treated with oral lacosamide (400 mg/d) for symptomatic partial epilepsy. She was concomitantly treated with folic acid (5 mg/d) beginning 4 days before her last menstrual cycle. She was also concomitantly treated with oral perampanel (2 mg/d) at 5-7 weeks\' gestation for seizure control but discontinued perampanel after the pregnancy was discovered. She progressed through her pregnancy with only mild seizures. Fetal growth was normal and ultrasonography revealed no external malformations. The patient had an elective cesarean section at 37 weeks and 2 days owing to a previous post-cesarean pregnancy. Her baby boy weighed 3025 g; his Apgar score was 8 and 9, 1 and 5 min, respectively, and his umbilical artery blood pH was 7.348. He had no congenital anomalies and no neonatal drug withdrawal symptoms. This suggests that lacosamide may have a low risk of teratogenicity and fetal toxicity. Thus, this case is valuable for clinicians who are considering the administration of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. In the future, more reports on the use of lacosamide during pregnancy should be collected.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) in pregnancy is rare and often presents at a late stage due to the masking of signs by pregnancy. A typical chemotherapeutic regimen for stage III and IV CRC comprised 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin. The treatment of CRC during pregnancy is complicated owing to the potential risk of teratogenicity with chemotherapy, especially in the first trimester. Data suggest that the administration of chemotherapy beyond the first trimester may be relatively safe. Previous reports have shown success with the use of FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-FU, oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-FU, irinotecan) during pregnancy. Moreover, neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-FU, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) resulted in improved outcomes when compared to standard preoperative chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic CRC. The use of FOLFOXIRI in pregnancy is not currently documented, and therefore, the outcomes of using this chemotherapeutic regimen are unclear. The aim of this case report was to demonstrate the use of FOLFOXIRI in pregnancy. A retrospective chart review was performed to assess the clinical course and fetal outcome of 2 patients presented in this case report. FOLFOXIRI was initiated in two pregnant women with nonmetastatic and metastatic CRC, resulting in successful delivery of healthy infants. FOLFOXIRI is an effective chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of advanced CRC and may be used during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

Preclinical studies with tofacitinib demonstrated teratogenic effects. Data about effects on human fetuses are limited and current recommendations are to immediately discontinue the treatment. Our purpose is to report a case of exposure to tofacitinib during the first trimester of pregnancy.
A 40-year-old woman with psoriatic arthritis became pregnant during the first month of treatment with tofacitinib. Tofacitinib was interrupted immediately, and parents were informed about the possible risks of teratogenicity. At the end of pregnancy, our patient gave birth to a healthy newborn.
All the available evidence of tofacitinib exposure during pregnancy in humans belongs to outcomes of unexpected pregnancies in the context of clinical trials and post-marketing cases. This case may contribute to enriching available data about teratogenic risks of tofacitinib exposure during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is currently used in a wide spectrum of autoimmune diseases and has been rendered very effective in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. MMF is known to be teratogenic (FDA category D) and therefore, women in childbearing period receiving MMF should be counselled to use effective contraceptive methods to avoid an unplanned pregnancy.
METHODS: A 22-year-old lady accidentally discovered to be pregnant while using MMF as a treatment of lupus nephritis which was replaced later on by azathioprine. After maternal and fetal evaluation, maternal lupus flare was confirmed and multiple fetal skeletal deformities associated with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) were diagnosed by 4-dimensional ultrasound. Termination of pregnancy was decided after shared decision making.
CONCLUSIONS: Women in childbearing period should be advised to postpone pregnancy for at least six weeks after stoppage of MMF therapy because of its potential teratogenic effects during pregnancy.

Rheumatic mitral stenosis is still a pathological condition that affects young patients and is an important cause of mortality. 2017-European Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease suggest a percutaneous approach with a mitral commissurotomy for the treatment of symptomatic pregnant women. Mitral commissurotomy procedure involves radiation exposure that is incompatible with the pregnancy condition. In our case, we present percutaneous mitral commissurotomy (PMC) to a 28-week pregnant woman with a low-radiation dose and the use of transesophageal echocardiography. The woman presented with a mitral transvalvular mean gradient of 21.6 mmHg and with symptoms non-responsive to medical treatment. PMC was driven by a transesophageal echocardiographic probe. This case demonstrates the feasibility and safety of PMC in a pregnant woman with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis.

The drug Primodos and other hormone pregnancy tests (HPTs) remained on the British market for about a decade after they were first implicated, in 1967, as a possible cause of birth defects. In November 2017, an expert working group (EWG) set up by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) concluded against such an association. However, it was explicitly \'not within the remit of the EWG to make formal conclusions or recommendations on the historical system or regulatory failures\', a situation that has left many stakeholders dissatisfied. Placing the question of a teratogenicity to one side, this article takes a more contextual and comparative approach than was possible under the auspices of MHRA. It asks why an unnecessary and possibly even harmful drug was allowed to remain on the British market when a reliable and perfectly safe alternative existed: urine tests for pregnancy. Based on archival research in several countries, this article builds a historical argument for regulatory failure in the case of HPTs. It concludes that the independent review which campaigners are calling for would have the potential to not only bring them a form of closure, but would also shed light on pressing issues of more general significance regarding risk, regulation and communication between policy makers, medical experts and patients.

The optimal anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy in women with mechanical heart valves remains controversial. This study highlights a case of high-dose warfarin ingestion throughout pregnancy and performed a systematic review to assess rates of teratogenicity with high versus low warfarin dosing (≤5 mg daily).
A literature search for all case reports and available literature was conducted in PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE up to December 2016 using medical subject heading terms \"mechanical prosthetic valves,\" \"pregnancy,\" \"oral anticoagulants,\" \"warfarin,\" \"coumarins,\" \"heparin, low-molecular-weight,\" and \"thromboembolism.\" To be included, warfarin had to be administered anytime between 6 and 12 weeks of gestation with the dose being specified. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess quality of the cohort data.
The woman in the studied case received the highest reported warfarin doses throughout pregnancy (14.5-16.5 mg daily) and delivered a baby with no evidence of teratogenicity to the current age of 5 years. The study identified 23 case reports, with all demonstrating warfarin teratogenicity regardless of high-dose (n = 12) or low-dose (n = 11) warfarin. Twelve cohort studies identified a warfarin teratogenicity rate of 5.0%, with rates of 2.4% and 10.5% with low- and high-dose warfarin, respectively. Risk of bias was moderate (median Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score of 6) for all of the cohort studies.
Although a lower prevalence of warfarin-induced teratogenicity is reported with low-dose warfarin, a safe \"cut-off\" dose is misleading. Teratogenic risk with warfarin is unpredictable, mandating individual decisions regardless of the dose.