UNASSIGNED: To investigate the doctor shopping trend of patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT) before undergoing surgery and the relevance of the results to the public.
UNASSIGNED: A survey was conducted of 326 patients from 10 hospitals (male, 176; female, 150) who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for symptomatic RCT between September 2019 and February 2020. A questionnaire was used to obtain data regarding the type of medical care service, medical institutions visited before surgery, number of treatments received, and cost of treatment.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 326 patients (87%) received treatment at least once at another medical institution before visiting the hospital where the surgery was performed. Patients visited an average of 9.4 health providers or physicians for shoulder pain before visiting the hospital where surgery was performed. Among the 326 patients, 148 (45%) visited more than two medical institutions and spent an average of 641,983 Korean won (KRW; $466, 50,000-5,000,000 KRW) before surgery. Medical expenses before surgery were proportional to the number of medical institutions visited (P=0.002), symptom duration (P=0.002), and initial visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (P=0.007) but were not associated with gender, age, VAS pain score immediately before surgery, or RCT size.
UNASSIGNED: Medical expense before ARCR was associated with the severity of preoperative pain and duration of symptoms. After onset of shoulder symptoms, patients should visit as soon as possible a hospital that has surgeons who specialize in shoulder repair to prevent unnecessary medical expense and proper treatment.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of rotator cuff tears often involves progressive pain development, tear enlargement, and advancing muscle fatty degeneration. Both surgery and conservative management have proven to be effective treatments. Our study purpose was to compare the short to mid-term effects of rotator cuff repair on shoulder function, progression of tear size, and muscle degeneration compared to controls with asymptomatic tears that developed pain and were managed nonoperatively.
METHODS: This comparative study consists of two separate longitudinal study arms. The control group consisted of asymptomatic degenerative cuff tears followed until pain development and then managed nonoperatively with continued surveillance. The surgical group consisted of subjects with degenerative tears that failed nonoperative treatment and underwent surgical intervention with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Outcomes included VAS pain, ASES, AROM, strength, and ultrasonography.
RESULTS: There were 83 controls and 65 surgical shoulders. The surgical group was younger at enrollment (58.9±5.3 yr vs. 61.2±7.8 yr, p=0.04). The median follow-up for control subjects after pain development was 5.1 years (IQR 3.6) and the median postoperative follow-up for the surgical group was 3.0 years (IQR 0.2). Baseline tear widths (median 14 mm, IQR 9 vs. 13 mm, IQR 8; p=0.45) and tear lengths (median 14 mm, IQR 13 vs. median 11 mm, IQR 8; p=0.06) were similar between the surgical group and controls. There were no differences in the baseline prevalence of fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus or infraspinatus muscles between groups (p=0.43 and p=0.58, respectively). At final follow-up, the surgical group demonstrated significantly lower VAS pain (0 [IQR 2] vs. 3.5 [IQR 4], p=0.0002), higher composite ASES (95 [IQR 13] vs. 65.8 [IQR 32], p=0.0002) and ADL scores (29 [IQR 4] vs. 22 [IQR 8], p=0.0002), greater abduction strength (69.6 N [SD 29] vs. 35.9 N [SD 29], p=0.0002), greater active forward elevation (155˚ [SD 8] vs. 142˚ [SD 28], p=0.002), greater active external rotation in abduction (mean 98.5˚, SD 12 vs. mean 78.2˚, SD 20; p=0.0002) compared to controls. Additionally, the prevalence of fatty muscle degeneration was lower in the surgical group for the supraspinatus and infraspinatus (25% vs. 41%, p=0.05; 17% vs. 34%, p=0.03; respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: This prospective longitudinal study comparing a surgical cohort undergoing rotator cuff repair with a control group treated nonoperatively supports the notion that surgical intervention has the potential to alter the early natural history of degenerative rotator cuff disease. Patients in the surgical group demonstrated clinically relevant differences in pain and functional outcomes. Surgical intervention was protective against progressive muscle degeneration compared to nonoperative treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To biomechanically compare superior glenohumeral translation, subacromial contact pressures and area in a box-shape reconstruction using the long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) in an irreparable supraspinatus tendon tear model.
METHODS: Seven cadaveric shoulders (mean age 61 years; range 32-84 years; SD 22.3) were tested with a custom testing rig used to evaluate superior translation, subacromial contact pressures and areas at 0°, 30° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction. Conditions tested included the native state, a complete tear of the supraspinatus tendon, a wide box-shaped, double-bundle LHBT superior capsular reconstruction (wide BS-SCR), and a narrow box-shaped, double-bundle LHBT superior capsular reconstruction (narrow BS-SCR).
RESULTS: Compared to the wide box-shape SCR, the narrow box-shape SCR had statistically significant lower median contact pressure at 30° and 60°. The subacromial contact area showed a statistically significant difference at 0° (p=0.001) and 30° (p=0.004) for the narrow compared to wide box-shape SCR. At an abduction angle of 0°, the narrow SCR could restore superior translation statistically significant better compared to the wide construct. For all angles, the wide and narrow box-shaped SCR increased the median subacromial distance statistically significantly. The contact areas in 30° and 60° of abduction were higher for all scenarios, both peaking in the intact state in 30° with approximately 600 mm2.
CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to a wide box-shape, a narrow box-shape SCR using the LHBT has biomechanical advantages in regard of subacromial contact pressures, the subacromial contact areas as well as the acromiohumeral distance. The width of the reconstruction therefore has direct influence in the success of the technique.

BACKGROUND: Functional assessments are crucial to evaluate treatment outcomes in clinical and animal studies on rotator cuff injuries. While gait analysis is commonly used to assess animal models of rotator cuff tears, it is less relevant for human patients as the human shoulder is typically assessed in a non-weight-bearing condition. The present study introduces the skilled reaching test as a shoulder functional assessment tool for rats, which allows for evaluation without weight bearing.
METHODS: In the control group, 8 male Sprague-Dawley rats received rotator cuff tear surgery without repair. In the rotator cuff repair group, 20 rats received rotator cuff repair at 4 weeks post rotator cuff tear. For the skilled reaching test, rats were trained to extend their forelimbs to fetch food pellets, and the number of trials, number of attempts and the success rate were recorded. The gait analysis and skilled reaching test were performed at baseline, 4 weeks post-tear, 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks post-repair. The repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate the effects of time on the shoulder function. The significance level was set at 0.05.
RESULTS: The skilled reaching test required 216 h to conduct, while the gait analysis took 44 h. In the rotator cuff repair group, gait performance significantly deteriorated at 1 week post-repair and restored to 4 weeks post-tear levels at 4 weeks post-repair. Regarding the skilled reaching test, the number of attempts, number of trials and the success rate decreased at 1 week post-repair. Subsequently, there was a brief rebound in performance observed at 2 weeks post-repair, followed by a continued decline in the number of attempts and trials. By 8 weeks post-repair, only the success rate had restored to levels similar to those observed at 4 weeks post-tear.
CONCLUSIONS: The skilled reaching test can detect functional deficiencies following rotator cuff tear and repair, while it requires high time and labour costs.

Background/Objectives: Recent studies imply that psychological factors and sleep quality play a role in the outcomes of surgical procedures, including in orthopedic surgery. The aim of the present study is to evaluate possible correlations between preoperative depression, anxiety, and quality of sleep and functional 6-month postoperative scores in patients having undergone rotator cuff repair (RCR). Methods: All patients included in the study performed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaires preoperatively and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and PSQI questionnaires at the six-month postoperative follow-up. A total of 47 patients were included in the analysis. Results: Statistically significant differences between preoperative anxious and not-anxious groups were found in the postoperative SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores and PSQI score. The correlation of the preoperative depression score to postoperative outcome measures revealed a strong positive correlation between the preoperative HADS-D score and the 6-month PCS, MCS, and OSS scores. The correlation of preoperative sleep quality to postoperative outcome measures revealed a strong positive correlation between the preoperative PSQI score and 6-month MCS score. Conclusions: Anxious patients had worse postoperative RCR outcomes. Depression may be influenced by factors related to RC pathology; however, there were no statistically significant correlations. Sleep quality generally improves postoperatively, and no significant association was found between bad preoperative sleepers and worse outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: The shoulder is the most mobile joint in the body, and is frequently exposed to injuries. The applied surgical treatments, protection of the shoulder after surgery, care in the use of the shoulder in activities of daily living (ADLs) and gradual exercise programs are all vital to the recovery process. The present study investigates the effect of video-assisted training (VAT) on upper extremity complications and functions after rotator cuff repair (RCR).
UNASSIGNED: Included in this prospective, parallel two-armed, randomized controlled study were an experimental group (n: 24) that received VAT detailing early postoperative care for RCR and instructions on performing ADLs, and that had access to a 90-day gradual exercise program, and a control group (n: 24) that received routine care. The primary outcomes were upper extremity problems and functions, as assessed by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and modified Constant-Murley scores (MCM), while secondary outcomes were complications that had developed within the past three months. The outcomes were measured at baseline, after six weeks and at three months.
UNASSIGNED: After 3 months, a statistically significant difference was noted in the DASH-Work (p = 0.001) and MCM ADLs scores (p = 0.003) of the two groups, and significant changes in which the scale scores of both groups when compared to the initial measurement. Only one patient in the VAT group developed complications after RCR at one month; there were no significant differences in the complications of the two groups (p = 0.235).
UNASSIGNED: VAT can increase function in RCR patients. Healthcare professionals, especially nurses, can use the VAT method to improve shoulder function in patients after RCR.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow stimulation (BMS), a procedure involving the creation of multiple channels in the greater tuberosity, is often performed alongside arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). This study evaluated the effect of BMS on clinical and structural outcomes following ARCR.
METHODS: This study involved 204 patients with small, medium, and large full-thickness rotator cuff tears. In all, 103 patients who underwent BMS and ARCR made up the BMS group, while the 101 patients who only had ARCR made up the control group with randomization. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed before and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery, using parameters such as range of motion, functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant score), and clinical scores (Visual Analogue Scale). Tendon integrity was also examined postoperatively via ultrasound at 6 months and 2 years.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning range of motion, functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Constant score), and clinical score (Visual Analogue Scale) during the 2-year postsurgery period (all P > .05). Similarly, the rotator cuff retear rate, as assessed using ultrasonographic tendon integrity checks over 2 years postsurgery, did not significantly vary between the groups (all P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant disparities in functional scores and clinical outcomes between the BMS and control groups. Further, no significant differences were observed in tendon integrity postsurgery. Therefore, the inclusion or exclusion of BMS is not anticipated to influence the postoperative outcome in ARCR for patients with small, medium, or large rotator cuff tears.

BACKGROUND: Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears treated with an isolated bioinductive repair (IBR) in lieu of a completion-and-repair have shown complete healing. This treatment option is afforded by the remaining tendon\'s structural integrity, which is similar to that present in small/medium full-thickness tears (FTTs) when the rotator cable remains intact. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigated whether an IBR for small/medium full-thickness tears resulted in superior healing and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) compared with a sutured repair.
METHODS: This prospective, double blinded (patients and outcome assessors), single-center randomized controlled trial enrolled patients ≥18 years with a small/medium (≤2.5 cm) full thickness supraspinatus tear and intact rotator cable. Patients were randomized and blinded to arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent repair (control, n = 30) or IBR (n = 30). The primary outcome was tendon quality on biopsy at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were PROs (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Constant-Murley Shoulder [CMS], and pain visual analogue scale scores) and tendon thickness and healing measured via MRI at 6, 12, and 24 months; satisfaction at 12 and 24 months; and time to return to work.
RESULTS: Baseline demographic, tear, and surgical characteristics were comparable between the groups (IBR: mean age, 54.2 years, 14 male; control: mean age, 56.4 years, 16 male). Measured via a 6-month biopsy, highly organized, parallel bundles of collagen, without inflammation, were present in all IBR patients, whereas poorly organized, nonparallel collagen fibers were present in 24/30 (80%) of control patients (P < .0001), with 28/30 having minimal to mild inflammation. The increase in tendon thickness measured via MRI at 6 months from baseline was greater in the IBR group (2.0 mm) than in the control group (0.8 mm) (P < .0001). All IBR patients had 100% healing on MRI at 12 and 24 months. Compared with the control group, the IBR group had higher American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant-Murley Shoulder scores at each evaluation, less pain at 6 and 12 months, and greater satisfaction at 12 and 24 months (P < .0003). The IBR group returned to work significantly faster (median 90 days [IQR, 25] vs. median 163.5 days [IQR, 24]; P < .0001) than the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a sutured repair, the IBR treatment resulted in superior tendon quality, patient outcomes, satisfaction, and return to work. The IBR enabled a robust healing response evident through MRI and biopsy evaluation, demonstrating superior tendon quality and healing.

UNASSIGNED: The coactivation (Co-A) of shoulder muscles that contribute to humeral head depression can lead to mechanical unloading of the subacromial structures during abduction and thus can be beneficial for patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). The present study aims to examine the effectiveness of humeral head depressor muscle Co-A (DM-Co-A) training on clinical outcomes in a sample of patients with ARCR.
UNASSIGNED: We hypothesized that DM-Co-A training with medioinferior vector during glenohumeral exercises can improve clinical results in the rehabilitation of ARCR.
UNASSIGNED: Randomized controlled single-blind study.
UNASSIGNED: Level 1B.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 27 patients who underwent ARCR after a medium-sized rotator cuff tear and completed their Phase 1 training with ≥80% compliance were included. Together with 14 weeks of conservative treatment (6 weeks of Phase 2 training and 8 weeks of Phase 3 training), synchronized \"DM-Co-A Training\" was applied to the treatment group with an electromyography (EMG) biofeedback (EMG-BF) device. Patients in the treatment group were asked to voluntarily activate the humeral head depressor muscles guided by visual and auditory feedback of the EMG-BF device during the Phase 2 and Phase 3 conservative treatment exercises performed by the control group. Demographic characteristics of the participants were recorded. Visual analog scale and universal goniometer were used to assess pre- and posttreatment pain severity and joint range of motion, respectively. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, Revised Oxford Shoulder Score, Modified Constant-Murley Shoulder Score, and the Western-Ontario Rotator Cuff Index were used to assess functionality.
UNASSIGNED: There was a clinically meaningful improvement in pain severity, active ROM excluding internal rotation, and functionality in the treatment group compared with the control group (P < 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: A 14-week duration DM-Co-A with EMG may be beneficial in the postoperative rehabilitation of patients after ARCR.

BACKGROUND: The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is a valuable tool for patient-based outcome analysis, for which limited data is available in the literature, especially after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Although several studies have reported MCID after ARCR, few have studied the impact of various clinical factors such as Diabetes, pseudoparalysis, type of cuff repair, and retear over MCID. This study attempts to determine the MCID in shoulder functional scores after ARCR and the impact of various factors on MCID.
METHODS: 144 patients undergoing ARCR were prospectively evaluated at six and 12 months by ASES and UCLA scores. MCID for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and the University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) scores were calculated using an anchor-based and distribution-based approach. MCID was also calculated for diabetic and non-diabetic patients, smokers vs. non-smokers, presence or absence of pseudoparalysis, type of cuff repair (single row vs. suture bridge), and presence of retears. Uni- and multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors affecting the MCID of both scores.
RESULTS: Mean MCID for ASES score was 13.3 and 16.6 using an anchor-based and distribution-based approach, respectively. For the UCLA score, the mean MCID was 10.0 and 12.6 by anchor-based and 12.6 by distribution-based approach, respectively. Patients with higher pre-operative ASES scores demonstrated lower MCID values. No significant difference was observed in MCID scores of diabetic vs. non-diabetic patients, smoker vs. non-smoker, patients with or without pseudoparalysis, and type of cuff repair. The age, gender, and presence of retear did not affect MCID values.
CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes the MCID values of ASES and UCLA scores for rotator cuff repair by anchor and distribution methods. No patient or surgical factors appear to affect the MCID except pre-operative ASES scores.
METHODS: Prospective cohort, Level II.