UNASSIGNED: To investigate whether the preoperative shoulder range of motion (ROM), would increase the risk of postoperative shoulder stiffness, or whether it would be associated with other preoperative patient characteristics.
UNASSIGNED: The authors retrospectively analysed the 372 shoulders that underwent rotator cuff repair by 4 surgeons, between January 2010 and January 2011. All patients were followed up at 3 and 6 months by 2 independent observers to collect the ROM, including active forward elevation (AFE), passive forward elevation (PFE), and external rotation (ER), as well as subjective shoulder value (SSV).
UNASSIGNED: Of the initial cohort of 372 patients, 10 were lost to follow-up (2.7%), leaving a final cohort of 362 patients available for outcome assessment at a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Of the 362 patients, 281 did not require corticosteroid infiltration, 68 received corticosteroid infiltrations for shoulder stiffness with no apparent cause, and 13 received corticosteroid infiltrations for other reasons. None of the variables were associated with infiltration for shoulder stiffness. Older patients had greater SSV scores (β = 0.3; 95% CI [0.1, 0.6]; P = .015), while both manual and repetitive workers had lower SSV scores (β = -10.7; 95% CI [-15.8, -5.6]; P < .001, and β = -10.2; 95% CI [-15.1, -5.3]; P < .001).
UNASSIGNED: Postoperative SSV was significantly associated with age, as well as manual or repetitive work. Furthermore, postoperative PFE, AFE, and ER were significantly associated with preoperative PFE. Finally, at 3 and 6 months postoperative, patients who required infiltration for shoulder stiffness had significantly lower PFE, AFE, and ER compared to patients who did not require infiltration.
UNASSIGNED: IV, Case series.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mental health attributes, such as the presence of psychiatric comorbidities or psychological comorbidities (low resilience), on outcomes after rotator cuff repair (RCR) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (results pages 1-20) were searched up to November 2023. Mental health problems of interest included the presence of psychiatric comorbidities (depression, anxiety) or indicators of poor psychological functioning, such as low resilience or the presence of distress. Patients were assigned to poor or good mental health groups in this study based on their grouping in the original study.
UNASSIGNED: Fourteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with good mental health had greater improvements in postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Simple Shoulder Test scores in the TSA cohort (P=0.003 and P=0.01), RCR cohort (P<0.001), and the combined TSA and RCR cohort (P<0.001). No difference was found in visual analog scale score, satisfaction, external rotation, or flexion between the two mental health groups. Patients with poor mental health undergoing RCR experienced higher rates of adverse events and transfusions (P<0.001). Patients with poor mental health also had greater rates of revision and emergency department visits in the TSA cohort (P<0.001), RCR cohort (P=0.05 and P=0.03), and combined cohort (P<0.001). Patients with poor mental health undergoing TSA had a higher rate of re-admission (P<0.001).
UNASSIGNED: Patients with poor preoperative mental health showed inferior patient-reported outcome scores and increased rates of adverse events, revisions, and re-admissions.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the doctor shopping trend of patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT) before undergoing surgery and the relevance of the results to the public.
UNASSIGNED: A survey was conducted of 326 patients from 10 hospitals (male, 176; female, 150) who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for symptomatic RCT between September 2019 and February 2020. A questionnaire was used to obtain data regarding the type of medical care service, medical institutions visited before surgery, number of treatments received, and cost of treatment.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 326 patients (87%) received treatment at least once at another medical institution before visiting the hospital where the surgery was performed. Patients visited an average of 9.4 health providers or physicians for shoulder pain before visiting the hospital where surgery was performed. Among the 326 patients, 148 (45%) visited more than two medical institutions and spent an average of 641,983 Korean won (KRW; $466, 50,000-5,000,000 KRW) before surgery. Medical expenses before surgery were proportional to the number of medical institutions visited (P=0.002), symptom duration (P=0.002), and initial visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (P=0.007) but were not associated with gender, age, VAS pain score immediately before surgery, or RCT size.
UNASSIGNED: Medical expense before ARCR was associated with the severity of preoperative pain and duration of symptoms. After onset of shoulder symptoms, patients should visit as soon as possible a hospital that has surgeons who specialize in shoulder repair to prevent unnecessary medical expense and proper treatment.

UNASSIGNED: The use of all-suture anchors for rotator cuff repair is increasing. Potential benefits include decreased bone loss and decreased damage to the chondral surface. Minimal evidence exists comparing outcomes among medial-row anchor fixation methods in double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair.
UNASSIGNED: To compare the clinical outcomes between all-suture and solid medial-row anchors in double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair.
UNASSIGNED: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 352 patients (mean age at surgery, 60.3 years) underwent double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair at our institution. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on whether they underwent all-suture (n = 280) or solid (n = 72) anchor fixation for the medial row. Outcomes data were collected via an ongoing longitudinal data repository or through telephone calls (minimum follow-up time, 2.0 years; mean follow-up time, 3.0 years). Outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) standardized shoulder assessment form and the visual analog scale (VAS). The same rehabilitation protocol was administered to all patients. The proportions of patients meeting previously published Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds were calculated for the outcome measures, and outcome scores and the proportions of patients meeting PASS thresholds between groups were compared using linear and logistic regression, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: The groups did not differ in terms of age at surgery, sex distribution, rotator cuff tear size, or number of medial-row anchors used. The solid anchor group had a longer follow-up time compared with the all-suture anchor group (3.6 ± 0.7 vs 2.8 ± 0.8 years, respectively; P < .01). After controlling for follow-up time, the solid and all-suture anchor groups did not differ in ASES scores (89.6 ± 17.8 vs 88.8 ± 16.7, respectively; P = .44) or VAS scores (1.1 ± 2.1 vs 1.2 ± 2.1, respectively; P = .37). Similarly, after controlling for follow-up time, the solid and all-suture anchor groups did not differ in the proportions of patients meeting PASS cutoffs for the ASES (84.7% vs 80.7%, respectively; P = .44) or the VAS (80.6% vs 75.0%, respectively; P = .83).
UNASSIGNED: Double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair using all-suture anchors for medial-row fixation demonstrated similar excellent clinical outcomes to rotator cuff repair using solid medial-row anchors.

Shoulder arthroscopy is an increasingly common procedure. Pneumothorax post-shoulder arthroscopy is a rare complication. Our aim is to highlight a case report of pneumothorax post-shoulder arthroscopy and to conduct a literature review to evaluate the possible risk factors. We report the case of a 75-year-old male non-smoker, who underwent right shoulder arthroscopy without regional anaesthesia in the left lateral position and subsequently suffered a pneumothorax post-operatively. A PubMed Medline and Cochrane database search was carried out, and 32 articles were identified and thoroughly reviewed. Overall, among the articles that propose a mechanism, 75% (9/12) consider the pathogenesis to be multifactorial. The exact mechanism is currently unknown. Awareness of this complication and timely recognition are important to prevent life-threatening sequelae. Surgeons should maintain a low threshold for obtaining diagnostic plain radiographs in the event of clinical suspicion.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of rotator cuff tears often involves progressive pain development, tear enlargement, and advancing muscle fatty degeneration. Both surgery and conservative management have proven to be effective treatments. Our study purpose was to compare the short to mid-term effects of rotator cuff repair on shoulder function, progression of tear size, and muscle degeneration compared to controls with asymptomatic tears that developed pain and were managed nonoperatively.
METHODS: This comparative study consists of two separate longitudinal study arms. The control group consisted of asymptomatic degenerative cuff tears followed until pain development and then managed nonoperatively with continued surveillance. The surgical group consisted of subjects with degenerative tears that failed nonoperative treatment and underwent surgical intervention with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Outcomes included VAS pain, ASES, AROM, strength, and ultrasonography.
RESULTS: There were 83 controls and 65 surgical shoulders. The surgical group was younger at enrollment (58.9±5.3 yr vs. 61.2±7.8 yr, p=0.04). The median follow-up for control subjects after pain development was 5.1 years (IQR 3.6) and the median postoperative follow-up for the surgical group was 3.0 years (IQR 0.2). Baseline tear widths (median 14 mm, IQR 9 vs. 13 mm, IQR 8; p=0.45) and tear lengths (median 14 mm, IQR 13 vs. median 11 mm, IQR 8; p=0.06) were similar between the surgical group and controls. There were no differences in the baseline prevalence of fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus or infraspinatus muscles between groups (p=0.43 and p=0.58, respectively). At final follow-up, the surgical group demonstrated significantly lower VAS pain (0 [IQR 2] vs. 3.5 [IQR 4], p=0.0002), higher composite ASES (95 [IQR 13] vs. 65.8 [IQR 32], p=0.0002) and ADL scores (29 [IQR 4] vs. 22 [IQR 8], p=0.0002), greater abduction strength (69.6 N [SD 29] vs. 35.9 N [SD 29], p=0.0002), greater active forward elevation (155˚ [SD 8] vs. 142˚ [SD 28], p=0.002), greater active external rotation in abduction (mean 98.5˚, SD 12 vs. mean 78.2˚, SD 20; p=0.0002) compared to controls. Additionally, the prevalence of fatty muscle degeneration was lower in the surgical group for the supraspinatus and infraspinatus (25% vs. 41%, p=0.05; 17% vs. 34%, p=0.03; respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: This prospective longitudinal study comparing a surgical cohort undergoing rotator cuff repair with a control group treated nonoperatively supports the notion that surgical intervention has the potential to alter the early natural history of degenerative rotator cuff disease. Patients in the surgical group demonstrated clinically relevant differences in pain and functional outcomes. Surgical intervention was protective against progressive muscle degeneration compared to nonoperative treatment.

(1) Background: The aims of this study were to compare serial changes in outcome measures in the early postoperative period after rotator cuff repair (RCR), anatomical total shoulder replacement (ATSR), and reverse total shoulder replacement (RTSR). (2) Methods: In total, 143 patients who underwent RCR (n = 47), ATSR (n = 46), and RTSR (n = 50) were included. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the activity of daily living (ADL) score, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score were completed. (3) Results: At 3 months, the recovery rate for the VAS pain score was 43.7% in the RCR, 89.1% in the ATSR, and 78.4% in RTSR. The recovery rate for the ADL score was 36.3%, 69.5%, and 76.4%. The recovery rate for ASES score was 40.9%, 79.5%, and 77.4%. For all outcome measures, a lower recovery rate was observed in the RCR group than in the ATSR and RTSR groups. At 6 months after surgery, the recovery rate for the VAS pain score was 69.9%, 100%, and 90.3%. The recovery rate for the ADL score was 66.8%, 92.8%, and 91.5%. The recovery rate for the ASES score was 68.7%, 96.5%, and 90.9%. (4) Conclusion: Compared with ATSR and RTSR, a slower recovery rate was observed for RCR, measured to be approximately 40% at 3 months and 70% at 6 months after surgery. Rapid improvement in pain and shoulder function was achieved after ATSR and RTSR, with a recovery rate of over 70% at 3 months and over 90% at 6 months after surgery.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on rotator cuff tears have examined both clinical and radiographic parameters which may influence post-operative clinical outcomes. While rotator cuff tears are frequently classified by size or depth, there is currently no literature available examining the thickness of the remnant tendon, and its impact on post-operative outcomes. We hypothesize that decreased pre-operative transverse tendon thickness will result in poorer post-operative clinical outcomes.
METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of small to medium full-thickness rotator cuff tears. These patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years post-operatively. Basic biodata, as well as Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Constant-Murley Score (CMS), UCLA Shoulder Score (USS), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at 3 different time points (pre-operatively, 1 year post-operatively, and 2 year post-operatively) were collected. Transverse tendon thickness was measured by independent blinded radiologists on pre-operative ultrasonographic images. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare outcome scores and multivariable robust linear model was fitted to assess the effect of transverse tendon thickness on post-operative scores.
RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were enrolled in this study, predominantly female (65%) and had a median age of 72 years. Pre-operatively, the median transverse cuff thickness was 5.0 mm and median tear size was 1.4 cm. The median VAS at preoperative was 7, which reduced to 0 at 2 year post-operative, indicating statistically significant improvement in pain levels (p<0.001). Statistically significant improvement in shoulder function measured by CMS, UCLA score and OSS were also seen over time (p<0.001). Robust regression analysis revealed that transverse cuff thickness had no statistically significant effect on VAS (p=0.99), CMS (p=0.84), UCLA score (p=0.22), and OSS scores (p=0.73) at 2 year postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative transverse tendon thickness of small- to mid-sized supraspinatus tears do not influence clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair. Differences in transverse tendon thickness may have an association with tendon healing but does not translate to an association with post-operative outcomes in terms of pain, function, and patient reported outcome measures. Level of evidenceIV.

UNASSIGNED: Patients with partial thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) often present with concurrent pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). To address both conditions simultaneously, long head of the biceps (LHB) tenotomy or tenodesis can be performed at the time of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). This study aims to compare postoperative shoulder active range of motion (AROM) and complications following transtendinous RCR with concurrent LHB tenodesis or tenotomy.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 90 patients with PTRCTs met inclusion criteria for this study. Patients who underwent tear-completion-and-repair, revision surgery, or open repair of the LHB tendon were excluded. Patients were stratified into tenotomy, arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis, or no biceps operation cohorts and were propensity matched 1:1:1 on age, sex, body mass index, and smoking status. Primary outcome measures included AROM in forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The development of severe stiffness and rates of rotator cuff retear at final follow-up were recorded as secondary outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: When comparing the tenotomy and tenodesis cohorts, tenotomy patients were found to have increased AROM at 3 months in forward flexion (153.2° vs. 130.1°, P = .004), abduction (138.6° vs. 114.2°, P = .019), and external rotation (60.4° vs. 43.8°, P = .014), with differences in forward flexion remaining significant at 6 months (162.4° vs. 149.4°, P = .009). There were no significant differences in interval rates of recovery in any plane between cohorts. Additionally, there were no significant differences in rates of symptomatic retears between groups (P = .458). Rates of severe postoperative stiffness approached but did not achieve statistical significance between tenotomy (4.2%) and tenodesis (29.2%) cohorts (P = .066). Smoking status was a significant predictor of severe stiffness (odds ratio, 13.69; P = .010).
UNASSIGNED: Despite significant differences in absolute AROM between cohorts, the decision to perform tenotomy or tenodesis was not found to differentially affect rates of AROM recovery for patients undergoing arthroscopic transtendinous RCR for PTRCT. Notably, however, transient stiffness complications were more commonly observed in smokers, and data trends suggested an increased risk of stiffness for patients undergoing LHB tenodesis. Overall, postoperative stiffness is likely multifactorial and attributable to both patient- and procedure-specific factors, and LHB tenotomy may be more appropriate for patients with risk factors for developing stiffness postoperatively.

UNASSIGNED: The margin convergence (MC) technique is used to repair longitudinal-type tears as direct repair of the apex of the longitudinal-type tear from medial to lateral is challenging. Few studies have compared the postoperative clinical outcomes and retear rates of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) using the MC technique with those of conventional ARCR without using the MC technique. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy of MC on the clinical outcome and retear rates of patients with large-sized rotator cuff tears. It was hypothesized that ARCR using the MC technique would yield clinical outcome and retear rates similar to those of ARCR without using the MC technique.
UNASSIGNED: The medical records of consecutive patients who underwent ARCR for large-sized rotator cuff tears were retrospectively evaluated. Forty-four and 35 shoulders were repaired using MC (MC group) and not using MC (non-MC group), respectively. The range of motion (ROM) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were assessed preoperatively and after a minimum follow-up period of 12 months postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at least 3 months postoperatively to determine whether the tendons had healed.
UNASSIGNED: The average postoperative follow-up duration was 26.6 months and 24.3 months in the MC and non-MC groups, respectively. The mean ROM and JOA score improved significantly in both groups postoperatively; however, the postoperative range of external rotation and the total JOA score was significantly lower in the MC group. The overall retear rate did not differ significantly between the MC (13/44, 29.5%) and non-MC (7/35, 20.0%) groups, respectively (P = .332). No significant differences were observed between the cases with retears in the 2 groups in terms of the postoperative ROM and the total JOA score. In contrast, the postoperative range of external rotation and the total JOA score of the patients with healed tendons in the MC group were significantly poorer than those of the patients with healed tendons in the non-MC group.
UNASSIGNED: ARCR using MC of large-sized longitudinal-type tears does not lead to better postoperative range of external rotation and clinical outcome compared with those of conventional repair.