residential facilities

住宅设施
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:抑郁症在澳大利亚老年护理服务(RACS)居民中很常见。这项研究旨在评估居民患抑郁症的风险,并确定与这种风险相关的因素。在诸如RACS之类的护理环境中,用于识别抑郁风险的时间有效的筛查工具可能是首选工具.
    方法:两项患者健康问卷(PHQ-2),源自美国(US)常用的九项PHQ-9,被用于这项研究。一名居民被确定为有抑郁风险,得分≥3。多变量logistic回归分析用于确定与抑郁风险相关的独立因素。
    结果:居民的平均年龄为87.7岁(标准差:7.3),73%为女性。五分之一的居民(n=108或20%)有抑郁症的风险。年龄(比值比[OR]0.96,95%置信区间[CI]0.93-0.99);晚期痴呆疼痛评估(PAINAD)评分(OR1.55,95%CI1.11-2.16);Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)评分(OR1.08,95%CI1.03-1.13);38项衰弱指数(FI)评分(OR1.07,95%CI1.03-10与抑郁风险而性爱,尿失禁,多药,痴呆严重程度评定量表(DSRS)和疗养院生活空间直径(NHLSD)评分均无。
    结论:五分之一的居民有抑郁症的风险。年龄更小,更高的疼痛,较高的日间嗜睡和较高的虚弱状态与抑郁风险相关.针对这些因素的干预措施的未来研究可能有助于改善健康结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Depression is common amongst Australian residential aged care services (RACS) residents. This study aimed to estimate the risk of depression amongst residents and identify factors associated with this risk. In care settings such as RACS, time-efficient screening tools to identify depression risk may be a preferred tool.
    METHODS: The two-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), derived from the nine-item PHQ-9 used commonly in the United States (US), was employed in this study. A resident was identified as being at risk of depression where the score was ≥3. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with being at risk of depression.
    RESULTS: Residents\' mean age was 87.7 (standard deviation: 7.3) years and 73% were female. One-fifth of residents (n = 108 or 20%) were at risk of depression. Age (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-0.99); Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) score (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.11-2.16); Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13); and 38-item Frailty Index (FI) score (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.10) were significantly associated with being at risk of depression, whilst sex, urinary incontinence, polypharmacy, Dementia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS) and Nursing Home Life Space Diameter (NHLSD) score were not.
    CONCLUSIONS: One in five residents were at risk of depression. Younger age, higher pain, higher daytime sleepiness and higher frailty status were associated with depressive risk. Future studies focusing on interventions targeting these factors may contribute to improved health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有痴呆症的疗养院居民的护理复杂性不断增加,需要新的护理模式来加强专业合作。为促进新护理模式的可持续实施,重要的是要将它们与护理现实联系起来。然而,对德国疗养院的专业内和跨专业组织和提供护理知之甚少。因此,这项研究的目的是探索当前的护理状况,在照顾患有痴呆症的居民方面,有关专业内和跨专业合作的问题和优势。
    方法:我们进行了全面的多案例研究。患有痴呆症的居民得到照顾的个人护理单位被定义为病例。上下文是由各自的疗养院及其与北莱茵-威斯特法伦州联邦州的地区隶属关系建立的。我们采用了定性的面对面访谈,用于数据收集的文档和背景调查表。不同的证据来源有助于捕捉互补的观点并验证调查结果。首先,使用演绎-归纳内容分析对收集的定性数据进行分析.第二,确定了案例之间的异同,以详细阐述特定案例和跨案例的模式和主题。报告遵循组织案例研究的EQUATOR报告指南。
    结果:我们包括四个护理单位,包括21名专业人员(护士,医师,社会工作者,物理治疗师,药剂师)和14名患有痴呆症的居民的亲属。分析揭示了四个类别来描述所有情况下当前的专业内和跨专业合作:参与者及其角色,服务交付,协调和治理,和沟通渠道。此外,我们确定了在所有情况下与专业内和专业间合作的优势和问题相关的三个类别:角色理解,团队合作,沟通和交流。虽然我们检查了类似的护理单位,我们发现,在实现专业协作和由此产生的问题和优势,是连接到所使用的组织环境和战略的差异。
    结论:尽管专业合作遵循给定的模式,但这些模式确实因上下文而异,被认为是有问题的和零碎的。因此,合作中发现的差异和问题需要在未来的研究中解决,以开发和成功实施量身定制的创新护理模式。
    BACKGROUND: The increasing care complexity of nursing home residents living with dementia requires new care models that strengthen professional collaboration. To contribute to the sustainable implementation of new care models, it is important that they are linked to the care reality. However, little is known about intra- and interprofessional organization and provision of care in German nursing homes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the current care situation, problems and strengths regarding intra- and interprofessional collaboration in the care of residents living with dementia.
    METHODS: We conducted a holistic multiple case study. The individual care units in which residents living with dementia are cared for were defined as cases. The context was built by the respective nursing homes and their regional affiliation to the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia. We used qualitative face-to-face interviews, documents and context questionnaires for data collection. The different sources of evidence served to capture complementary perspectives and to validate the findings. First, the collected qualitative data were analyzed using deductive-inductive content analysis. Second, similarities and differences between the cases were identified to elaborate case-specific and cross-case patterns and themes. The reporting followed the EQUATOR reporting guideline for organizational case studies.
    RESULTS: We included four care units comprising 21 professionals (nurses, physicians, social worker, physiotherapist, pharmacist) and 14 relatives of residents living with dementia. The analysis revealed four categories to describe current intra- and interprofessional collaboration in all cases: actors and their roles, service delivery, coordination and governance, and communication channel. Moreover, we identified three categories that relate to the strengths and problems of intra- and interprofessional collaboration in all cases: role understanding, teamwork, and communication and exchange. Although we examined similar care units, we found differences in the realization of professional collaboration and resulting problems and strengths that are connected to the organizational contexts and strategies used.
    CONCLUSIONS: Even though professional collaboration follows given patterns; these patterns do differ context-specifically and are perceived as problematic and fragmentary. Therefore, the identified differences and problems in collaboration need to be addressed in future research to develop and successfully implement tailored innovative care models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:以人口为基础的老年护理姑息治疗所需需求的数据已被强调为一个关键的信息差距。本研究旨在使用基于死亡原因的有效算法,对澳大利亚居民老年护理人群的姑息治疗需求进行全面评估。
    方法:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究是使用来自新南威尔士州非土著居民老年人登记处的数据进行的。维多利亚,以及65岁以上的南澳大利亚,他在2016年至2017年之间去世(n=71,677)。一种经过国际验证的算法用于根据死亡原因估计和表征潜在的姑息治疗需求。将此估计值与从基于资金的护理需求评估数据中确定的姑息治疗需求进行比较。
    结果:估计有92%(n=65,949)的人在死亡之前有潜在的姑息治疗需求。其中,19%(n=12,467)被分配了与癌症相关的生命终点轨迹,61%(n=40,511)患有器官衰竭,20%(n=12,971)患有虚弱和痴呆。相比之下,只有6%(n=4430)的居民通过基于资金的护理需求评估被评估为需要姑息治疗.
    结论:超过90%的死于老年护理的人可能受益于姑息治疗方法。基于资金的护理需求评估大大低估了这种需求,它利用了临死时姑息治疗的狭义定义。显然,必须在老年居民护理中区分姑息治疗和临终关怀需求,以确保适当和公平地获得姑息治疗。
    OBJECTIVE: Population-based data on the required needs for palliative care in residential aged care have been highlighted as a key information gap. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive estimate of palliative care needs among Australia\'s residential aged care population using a validated algorithm based on causes of death.
    METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Registry of Senior Australians of non-Indigenous residents of residential aged care services in New South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia aged older than 65 years, who died between 2016 and 2017 (n = 71,677). An internationally validated algorithm was used to estimate and characterise potential palliative care needs based on causes of death. This estimate was compared to palliative care needs identified from funding-based care needs assessment data.
    RESULTS: Ninety two per cent (n = 65,949) were estimated to have had potential palliative care needs prior to their death. Of these, 19% (n = 12,467) were assigned an end-of-life trajectory related to cancer, 61% (n = 40,511) to organ failure and 20% (n = 12,971) to frailty and dementia. By comparison, only 6% (n = 4430) of residents were assessed as needing palliative care by the funding-based care needs assessment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Over 90% of individuals dying in residential aged care may have benefited from a palliative approach to care. This need is substantially underestimated by the funding-based care needs assessment, which utilises a narrow definition of palliative care when death is imminent. There is a clear imperative to distinguish between palliative and end-of-life care needs within residential aged care to ensure appropriate and equitable access to palliative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:寄宿护理和惩教机构中的青少年和年轻人面临各种挑战,导致负面的生活结果。这些机构内部的执行障碍,例如有限的财政和空间资源,对提供必要的支持构成重大障碍。基于网络的方法通过提供具有成本效益的、可访问的解决方案。这项研究旨在评估新开发的基于网络的现有基于证据的STARTNOW技能培训在促进制度化青少年和年轻人的情绪调节和韧性方面的功效。我们介绍了该试验的研究方案(第5版,2023年8月),标题为“实施从现在开始的技能培训的电子版,以促进住院青年护理和惩教机构的情绪调节和韧性”。
    方法:这项研究是单中心的,prospective,对150名需要提高复原力的住院青少年和年轻成年人进行验证性随机对照试验(预定义的界限).参与机构将被随机分为以下三个条件之一:(i)在主持人的指导下进行为期9周的基于网络的团体培训,(ii)为期9周的网络自助培训,(iii)及照常治疗。主要终点是心理灵活性的变化,通过青少年得分的回避和融合问卷进行评估,技能培训后从基线到随访12周。次要目标包括评估参与青少年的心理灵活性和其他与心理健康相关的结果指标的事后变化,年轻人,和从基线开始的看护人,在培训后,以及12周和24周的随访。
    结论:这项研究评估了STARTNOW作为制度化青少年和年轻人的网络培训的有效性,为基于网络的干预提供有价值的见解,并旨在优化支持水平。试验注册{2A和2B}:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05313581。2022年4月6日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults in residential care and correctional institutions face various challenges, leading to negative life outcomes. Implementation barriers within these institutions, such as limited financial and spatial resources, pose significant hurdles to providing necessary support. Web-based approaches address these challenges by offering cost-effective, accessible solutions. This study aims to assess the efficacy of a newly developed web-based version of the existing evidence-based START NOW skills training in fostering emotion regulation and resilience among institutionalized adolescents and young adults. We present the study protocol (Version 5, August 2023) of the trial titled \"Implementation of an e-version of the skills training START NOW for promoting emotion regulation and resilience in residential youth care and correctional institutions\".
    METHODS: The study is a monocentric, prospective, confirmatory randomized controlled trial with 150 institutionalized adolescents and young adults with a need to improve resilience (predefined cut-offs). Participating institutions will be randomized to one of three conditions: (i) 9-week web-based group training guided by a facilitator, (ii) 9-week web-based self-help training, (iii) and treatment as usual. The primary endpoint is the change in psychological flexibility, assessed by the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth score, from baseline to follow-up 12 weeks post skills training. Secondary objectives encompass assessing pre-post changes in psychological flexibility and other psychological health-related outcome measures in participating adolescents, young adults, and caretakers from baseline, to post training, and to 12- and 24-week follow-ups.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluates the efficacy of START NOW as web-based training for institutionalized adolescents and young adults, providing valuable insights into web-based interventions and aiming to optimize support levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION {2A AND 2B}: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05313581. Registered on 6 April 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:攻击性和自我伤害等具有挑战性的行为对住院护理的客户和工作人员来说是危险的。这些行为没有得到很好的理解,因此经常被标记为“复杂”。然而,这种所谓的复杂性在个人层面上的含义仍然模糊。本案例研究采用了三步混合方法分析策略,受到复杂系统理论的启发。首先,我们解释了她日常生活中相关因素的整体总结。第二,我们通过确定稳定阶段来描述她具有挑战性的行为轨迹.第三,她的环境中的不稳定性和异常事件被评估为不同阶段之间的潜在变化诱导机制.
    方法:一个女人,住在一个住宅设施,诊断为轻度智力障碍和边缘性人格障碍,表现出攻击性和自我伤害事件的慢性模式。她每天使用生态瞬时评估对560天的挑战行为进行自我评估。
    结论:对看护者记录的定性总结揭示了许多与她日常生活相关的内部和环境因素。她的临床医生将这些范围缩小到11名员工假设的风险和保护因素,比如重温创伤,经历疼痛,接受医疗护理或赞美。强制性措施增加了第二天挑战行为的机会,而心理治疗会减少第二天自我伤害的机会。这11个因素与自我报告的挑战性行为之间的大多数同期和滞后关联是不显著的,表明挑战性行为不受单一因果关系的支配,谈到它的复杂性。尽管存在这种复杂性,但事件的时间顺序还是存在模式。在560天中,分别发生了13%和50%的攻击和自我伤害。在此时间表上,确定了11个不同的稳定阶段,这些阶段在四个独特状态之间交替:高水平的侵略和自我伤害,平均侵略和自我伤害,低攻击性和自我伤害,低攻击性和高自伤。十个阶段之间的过渡中有八个是由她的环境中的非凡事件触发的,或者在她的自我评价波动加剧之前,或者这两者的组合。理想的模式出现更频繁,不太容易延展,表明当她经历糟糕的时候,记住未来会有更好的时代是充满希望和现实的。
    BACKGROUND: Challenging behaviors like aggression and self-injury are dangerous for clients and staff in residential care. These behaviors are not well understood and therefore often labeled as \"complex\". Yet it remains vague what this supposed complexity entails at the individual level. This case-study used a three-step mixed-methods analytical strategy, inspired by complex systems theory. First, we construed a holistic summary of relevant factors in her daily life. Second, we described her challenging behavioral trajectory by identifying stable phases. Third, instability and extraordinary events in her environment were evaluated as potential change-inducing mechanisms between different phases.
    METHODS: A woman, living at a residential facility, diagnosed with mild intellectual disability and borderline personality disorder, who shows a chronic pattern of aggressive and self-injurious incidents. She used ecological momentary assessments to self-rate challenging behaviors daily for 560 days.
    CONCLUSIONS: A qualitative summary of caretaker records revealed many internal and environmental factors relevant to her daily life. Her clinician narrowed these down to 11 staff hypothesized risk- and protective factors, such as reliving trauma, experiencing pain, receiving medical care or compliments. Coercive measures increased the chance of challenging behavior the day after and psychological therapy sessions decreased the chance of self-injury the day after. The majority of contemporaneous and lagged associations between these 11 factors and self-reported challenging behaviors were non-significant, indicating that challenging behaviors are not governed by mono-causal if-then relations, speaking to its complex nature. Despite this complexity there were patterns in the temporal ordering of incidents. Aggression and self-injury occurred on respectively 13% and 50% of the 560 days. On this timeline 11 distinct stable phases were identified that alternated between four unique states: high levels of aggression and self-injury, average aggression and self-injury, low aggression and self-injury, and low aggression with high self-injury. Eight out of ten transitions between phases were triggered by extraordinary events in her environment, or preceded by increased fluctuations in her self-ratings, or a combination of these two. Desirable patterns emerged more often and were less easily malleable, indicating that when she experiences bad times, keeping in mind that better times lie ahead is hopeful and realistic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    步态速度和定时上升(TUG)预测认知能力下降,falls,和死亡率。双重任务可能在痴呆症患者(PWD)的认知筛查中有用,但需要更多的证据.这项横断面研究旨在比较单任务和双任务表现,并确定痴呆严重程度对双任务表现和干扰的影响。在两个住宅护理设施中的30名PWD(年龄:81.3±7.1岁;蒙特利尔认知评估:10.4±6.0分)完成了两项单任务姿势(双脚分开)和双任务姿势(向后计数时双脚分开)的试验,单(步行4m)和双任务步态(在命名单词时步行4m),和单-(定时上行(TUG)),以及带有APDM惯性传感器的双任务功能移动性(完成类别任务时的TUG)。双重任务导致更大的摇摆频率,混蛋,和摇摆区域;步态速度较慢;双肢支撑较大;步幅较短;中摆高度降低;TUG持续时间较长;转弯角度减小;转弯速度比单任务慢(ps<0.05)。双任务表现受到影响(双肢支撑减少,更大的中间摆动高程),和双重任务干扰(更大的冲击,与轻度PWD相比,更快的步态速度)与中度至重度相关。与轻度PWD相比,中度至重度PWD的动态稳定性较差,并且在双重任务中适当选择谨慎步态的能力降低,表明双重任务对认知筛查的有用性。
    Gait speed and timed-up-and-go (TUG) predict cognitive decline, falls, and mortality. Dual-tasks may be useful in cognitive screening among people living with dementia (PWD), but more evidence is needed. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare single- and dual-task performance and determine the influence of dementia severity on dual-task performance and interference. Thirty PWD in two residential care facilities (Age: 81.3 ± 7.1 years; Montreal Cognitive Assessment: 10.4 ± 6.0 points) completed two trials of single- (feet apart) and dual-task posture (feet apart while counting backward), single- (walk 4 m) and dual-task gait (walk 4m while naming words), and single- (timed-up-and-go (TUG)), and dual-task functional mobility (TUG while completing a category task) with APDM inertial sensors. Dual-tasks resulted in greater sway frequency, jerk, and sway area; slower gait speed; greater double limb support; shorter stride length; reduced mid-swing elevation; longer TUG duration; reduced turn angle; and slower turn velocity than single-tasks (ps < 0.05). Dual-task performance was impacted (reduced double limb support, greater mid-swing elevation), and dual-task interference (greater jerk, faster gait speed) was related to moderate-to-severe compared to mild PWD. Moderate-to-severe PWD had poorer dynamic stability and a reduced ability to appropriately select a cautious gait during dual-tasks than those with mild PWD, indicating the usefulness of dual-tasks for cognitive screening.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:临床实践指南建议禁止在老年住宅护理机构(RACF)中常规使用精神药物。知识经纪人是促进知识转化为实践的个人或团体。该试验的目的是评估使用知识经纪人翻译澳大利亚新的《痴呆症患者和住院老人护理中适当使用精神药物的临床实践指南》的有效性和成本效益。
    方法:居住老年人CarE的循证医学知识经纪人(EMBRACE)试验是一项螺旋平衡的随机对照试验。这项为期12个月的试验将在维多利亚州的四个澳大利亚老年护理提供者组织运营的多达19个RACF中进行,新南威尔士州,西澳大利亚州和昆士兰州。RACF将随机接受三个级别的实施策略(知识中介服务,药剂师主导的药物教育活动的质量使用以及指南和辅助材料的分发)在三种药物环境中(抗精神病药,苯二氮卓类药物和抗抑郁药)。实施策略将由嵌入式现场老年护理药剂师在每个参与的RACF的系统级别工作。所有RACF将同时接受所有实施策略,但适用于不同的药物环境。主要结果将是6个月的RACF水平与指南建议和使用抗精神病药的人的良好实践声明一致的复合二分法测量。苯二氮卓类药物和抗抑郁药对行为的改变。次要结果将包括与指南一致使用抗精神病药的居民比例,在RACF水平和使用精神药物的居民比例上测量的苯二氮卓类药物和抗抑郁药,住院治疗,falls,受伤摔倒,多药,生活质量,日常生活活动,在RACF级别测量的药物事件和行为事件。
    结论:EMBRACE试验研究了一种新的指南实施策略,以提高RACF中精神药物的安全和有效使用。我们预计这些发现将为知识经纪人在成功和具有成本效益的指南实施中的潜在作用提供新的信息。
    背景:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册(ANZCTR):ACTRN12623001141639。2023年11月6日注册-追溯注册,https://www.anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.aspx.
    BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines recommend against the routine use of psychotropic medications in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Knowledge brokers are individuals or groups who facilitate the transfer of knowledge into practice. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using knowledge brokers to translate Australia\'s new Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Psychotropic Medications in People Living with Dementia and in Residential Aged Care.
    METHODS: The Evidence-based Medication knowledge Brokers in Residential Aged CarE (EMBRACE) trial is a helix-counterbalanced randomised controlled trial. The 12-month trial will be conducted in up to 19 RACFs operated by four Australian aged care provider organisations in Victoria, New South Wales, Western Australia and Queensland. RACFs will be randomised to receive three levels of implementation strategies (knowledge broker service, pharmacist-led quality use of medications education activities and distribution of the Guidelines and supporting materials) across three medication contexts (antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants). Implementation strategies will be delivered by an embedded on-site aged care pharmacist working at a system level across each participating RACF. All RACFs will receive all implementation strategies simultaneously but for different medication contexts. The primary outcome will be a composite dichotomous measure of 6-month RACF-level concordance with Guideline recommendations and good practice statements among people using antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants for changed behaviours. Secondary outcomes will include proportion of residents with Guideline concordant use of antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants measured at the RACF-level and proportion of residents with psychotropic medication use, hospitalisation, falls, falls with injury, polypharmacy, quality of life, activities of daily living, medication incidents and behavioural incidents measured at the RACF-level.
    CONCLUSIONS: The EMBRACE trial investigates a novel guideline implementation strategy to improve the safe and effective use of psychotropic medications in RACFs. We anticipate that the findings will provide new information on the potential role of knowledge brokers for successful and cost-effective guideline implementation.
    BACKGROUND: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12623001141639. Registered 6 November 2023 - retrospectively registered, https://www.anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.aspx .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们研究了哪些设施特征与住院护理社区(RCC)的护士流失有关。这是一项横断面研究,使用2018年国家长期护理提供者公共使用档案研究。在检查注册护士(RN)营业额时,有3331个RCC(未加权n=272),在检查助手营业额时,加权样本为13,676个RCC(未加权n=68)。RN流失率为72%(95%置信区间(CI)59%,84%),52%的人报告了100%的营业额。助手更替率为48%(95%CI43%,53%);11%报告100%营业额。我们检查了所有权和设施类型,作业设计,经济,以及与营业额相关的工作环境因素。使用多元线性回归,与营利性相比,非营利性RCC的RN营业额降低了25个百分点(95%CI:-44.46,-4.31),助手营业额降低了9.7个百分点(95%CI:18.8,-0.6)。我们发现较大的RCC的助手营业额较低。
    We examine what facility characteristics are associated with nurse turnover in residential care communities (RCCs). This is a cross-sectional study using the 2018 National Study of Long-term Care Provider Public Use File. There were 3331 RCCs (unweighted n = 272) represented when examining registered nurse (RN) turnover and when examining aide turnover there was a weighted sample of 13,676 RCCs (unweighted n = 68). RN turnover was 72% (95% confidence interval (CI) 59%, 84%), 52% reported 100% turnover. Aide turnover was 48% (95% CI 43%, 53%); 11% reported 100% turnover. We examined ownership and facility type, job design, economic, and working environment factors related to turnover. Using multivariate linear regression, non-profit RCCs had 25 percentage points lower RN turnover (95% CI: -44.46, -4.31) and 9.7 percentage points lower aide turnover (95% CI: 18.8, -0.6) compared to for-profits. We find larger RCCs had lower aide turnover.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在瑞典,住院护理的老年人死亡率最高,其次是那些接受家庭护理的人,在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间。尽管缺乏先决条件和培训,但照顾老年人的工作人员承担了防止病毒传播的责任。本研究旨在调查COVID-19大流行期间老年人护理工作人员的社会心理工作环境,并研究与工作人员对指导的清晰度和遵循指导的能力的看法相关的因素。
    方法:采用网络调查的横断面研究设计。使用描述性统计数据分析了员工对其社会心理环境的看法。组织因素和个人因素之间的联系,以及说明的清晰程度和工作人员遵循它们的能力,使用多变量(序数)回归分析进行评估。
    结果:主要发现表明,对说明的清晰度和适应性的看法主要与组织因素有关,作为对侧重于角色清晰度的子量表的较高响应(正),对工作中的领导的支持和鼓励与指示明确的信念有关。同样,那些表示高工作要求和高个人学习要求的人不太可能报告说明是明确的。关于适应性,学习需求和心理需求的高分与较低的适应性相关,虽然角色清晰度得分很高,鼓励领导和社会支持,与更高的适应性有关。
    结论:高工作要求和个人学习要求被证明会降低员工对指导的理解和采纳。这些发现在组织层面上具有重要意义,因为工作环境必须为潜在的未来大流行做好准备,以促进质量改进并普遍提高患者安全和员工健康。
    BACKGROUND: In Sweden, older people in residential care had the highest mortality rates, followed by those who received home care, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Staff working in the care of older people assumed responsibility for preventing the spread of the virus despite lacking the prerequisites and training. This study aimed to investigate the psychosocial work environment during the COVID-19 pandemic among staff in the care of older people and examine the factors associated with staff\'s perceptions of the clarity of instructions and the ability to follow them.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was employed using a web survey. The staff\'s perceptions of their psychosocial environment were analysed using descriptive statistics. The association between organisational and individual factors, as well as the degree of clarity of the instructions and the staff\'s ability to follow them, were assessed using multivariate (ordinal) regression analysis.
    RESULTS: The main findings show that perceptions of the clarity and adaptability of the instructions were primarily correlated with organisational factors, as higher responses (positive) for the subscales focusing on role clarity, support and encouragement in leadership at work were associated with the belief that the instructions were clear. Similarly, those indicating high job demands and high individual learning demands were less likely to report that the instructions were clear. Regarding adaptability, high scores for demands on learning and psychological demands were correlated with lower adaptability, while high scores for role clarity, encouraging leadership and social support, were associated with higher adaptability.
    CONCLUSIONS: High job demands and individual learning demands were demonstrated to decrease the staff\'s understanding and adoption of instructions. These findings are significant on an organisational level since the work environment must be prepared for potential future pandemics to promote quality improvement and generally increase patient safety and staff health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    特定于痴呆症的护理单位的组织特征各不相同,难以在实证研究中进行比较。根据德国疗养院护理单位的代表性样本,我们提出了一种针对痴呆症特定护理结构的组织特征类型学。我们还研究了痴呆症患者的组织类型与非药物干预措施之间的关系。
    数据是在德国范围内对134个护理单位的分层随机样本进行的调查中收集的,该调查使用了标准化问卷,该问卷是在与疗养院管理员或其代表进行电话采访时进行的。类型学是基于混合数据的因子分析和层次聚类分析开发的。
    我们确定了4种类型的护理单位:痴呆症护理单位(DCU;n=40),痴呆症特别护理单位(DSCU;n=17),通常的独立护理单位(n=58),和通常的合并护理单位(n=19)。所有护理单元类型的组织特征明显不同。DSCU的专业化与成本承担者达成一致,并包括准入标准,更高的成本,和更好的员工条件。没有专业化的痴呆症护理单位没有这些特征。七个非药物干预措施中有三个与DSCU相关,两个与DCU相关。但不是其他类型的护理单元。
    研究人员可以使用类型学在实证研究中定义和描述护理单位,并提高对上下文的理解和可比性。明确的护理单位定义也可以改善国际比较。
    UNASSIGNED: Dementia-specific care units vary in their organizational characteristics and are difficult to compare in empirical studies. Based on a representative sample of care units in German nursing homes, we present a typology of organizational characteristics focusing on dementia-specific care structures. We also examine the relationships between organizational types and the provision of nonpharmacological interventions for people with dementia.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were collected in a Germany-wide survey of a stratified randomized sample of 134 care units using a standardized questionnaire administered during telephone interviews with nursing home administrators or their representatives. The typology was developed based on a factor analysis of mixed data and a hierarchical cluster analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 4 types of care units: Dementia Care Units (DCUs; n = 40), Dementia Special Care Units (DSCUs; n = 17), Usual Separated Care Units (n = 58), and Usual Incorporated Care Units (n = 19). All care unit types clearly differed in their organizational characteristics. The specialization of DSCUs was agreed upon with cost bearers and included admission criteria, higher costs, and better staff conditions. Dementia Care Units without specialization did not have these characteristics. Three of seven nonpharmacological interventions were associated with the DSCUs and two with DCUs, but not with the other care unit types.
    UNASSIGNED: Researchers can use the typology to define and describe care units in empirical studies and improve the understanding and comparability of the context. A clear definition of care units also improves international comparisons.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号