residential facilities

住宅设施
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为使用抗精神病药物的长期护理机构(LTCFs)的居民提供一份关于药物不良事件(ADE)的十大体征和症状的共识清单,苯二氮卓类药物,或者抗抑郁药.
    方法:3轮德尔菲研究。
    方法:老年医生,精神病医生,药理学家,全科医生,药剂师,护士,和来自13个亚太地区的护理人员,欧洲,和北美国家。
    方法:在2023年4月至6月之间完成了三轮调查。在第1轮中,参与者表示了他们对9点李克特量表的共识水平,即是否应常规监测系统审查中确定的41种体征或症状。参与者考虑了降低生活质量或造成重大伤害的体征和症状,可由护士或护理人员观察或测量,并且可以在单个时间点进行评估。如果≥70%的参与者在李克特量表上回答≥7,则第1轮陈述将包括在第3轮的优先级列表中。如果≤30%的参与者回答≥7,则排除陈述。在第二轮中,与会者表示了他们对没有达成初步共识的声明的一致意见,加上基于第一轮参与者反馈的修改声明。如果≥50%的参与者在李克特量表上回答≥7,则将第2轮陈述纳入第3轮。在第3轮中,参与者优先考虑体征和症状。
    结果:44名参与者(93.6%)完成了所有3轮比赛。41种体征和症状中的4种在第1轮之后达成共识,9种在第2轮之后达成共识。第3轮中最优先考虑的10种体征和症状是最近的跌倒,白天嗜睡或嗜睡,异常运动(例如,晃动或刚度),困惑或迷失方向,平衡问题,头晕,体位性低血压,减少自我照顾,躁动,口干。
    结论:前10种体征和症状为主动监测精神型ADE提供了依据。
    OBJECTIVE: To produce a consensus list of the top 10 signs and symptoms suggestive of adverse drug events (ADEs) for monitoring in residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) who use antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, or antidepressants.
    METHODS: A 3-round Delphi study.
    METHODS: Geriatricians, psychiatrists, pharmacologists, general practitioners, pharmacists, nurses, and caregivers from 13 Asia Pacific, European, and North American countries.
    METHODS: Three survey rounds were completed between April and June 2023. In Round 1, participants indicated their level of agreement on a 9-point Likert scale on whether 41 signs or symptoms identified in a systematic review should be routinely monitored. Participants considered signs and symptoms that reduce quality of life or cause significant harm, are observable or measurable by nurses or care workers, and can be assessed at a single time point. Round 1 statements were included in a list for prioritization in Round 3 if ≥ 70% of participants responded ≥7 on the Likert scale. Statements were excluded if ≤ 30% of participants responded ≥7. In Round 2, participants indicated their level of agreement with statements that did not reach initial consensus, plus amended statements based on Round 1 participant feedback. Round 2 statements were included in Round 3 if ≥ 50% of the participants responded ≥7 on the Likert scale. In Round 3, participants prioritized the signs and symptoms.
    RESULTS: Forty-four participants (93.6%) completed all 3 rounds. Four of 41 signs and symptoms reached consensus for inclusion after Round 1, and 9 after Round 2. The top 10 signs and symptoms prioritized in Round 3 were recent falls, daytime drowsiness or sleepiness, abnormal movements (eg, shaking or stiffness), confusion or disorientation, balance problems, dizziness, postural hypotension, reduced self-care, restlessness, and dry mouth.
    CONCLUSIONS: The top 10 signs and symptoms provide a basis for proactive monitoring for psychotropic ADEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    管理住宅护理设施(RCF)包括管理不良事件的能力,同时保持基于人权的护理和支持方法。研究RCF中基于权利的方法的文献很少;因此,对RCF当前方法的调查将为改进提供信息。这项研究试图通过分析从爱尔兰社会关怀法定通知数据库中获取的2021年不良事件通知,来确定爱尔兰的RCF在不良事件过程中是否坚持基于权利的方法。数据分析由两名研究人员独立进行。不良事件的通知根据是否符合公平的人权原则进行编码,尊重,平等,尊严,在不良事件及其后续管理期间,自主性得到维护或侵犯。有一些违规的证据,包括员工在不良事件期间的违规行为及其管理,以及违反同胞居民自治的居民,尊重,和尊严在“严重伤害”和“虐待指控”的通知中。\"然而,总的来说,确定了良好做法,居民的人权得到工作人员的维护。我们的研究结果表明,在不良事件及其管理期间,基于权利的护理和支持方法得到了支持,这可能表明已经采取了这种照顾和支持的方法。
    Managing residential care facilities (RCFs) includes the ability to manage adverse events while maintaining a human rights-based approach to care and support. Literature investigating rights-based approaches in RCFs is scarce; therefore, an investigation of the current approach in RCFs will inform improvements. This study sought to identify whether RCFs in Ireland upheld a rights-based approach during the course of adverse events by analyzing notifications of adverse events from 2021 taken from the Database of Statutory Notifications from Social Care in Ireland. Data analysis was conducted independently by two researchers. Notifications of adverse events were coded according to whether the human rights principles of fairness, respect, equality, dignity, and autonomy were upheld or violated during the adverse event and its subsequent management. There was some evidence of violations, including staff violations during adverse events and their management, as well as residents violating fellow residents\' autonomy, respect, and dignity in notifications of \"serious injury\" and \"allegations of abuse.\" However, overall, good practice was identified, with residents\' human rights upheld by staff. Our findings indicate that a rights-based approach to care and support is being upheld during adverse events and their management, which may indicate that such an approach to care and support has been adopted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:以人口为基础的老年护理姑息治疗所需需求的数据已被强调为一个关键的信息差距。本研究旨在使用基于死亡原因的有效算法,对澳大利亚居民老年护理人群的姑息治疗需求进行全面评估。
    方法:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究是使用来自新南威尔士州非土著居民老年人登记处的数据进行的。维多利亚,以及65岁以上的南澳大利亚,他在2016年至2017年之间去世(n=71,677)。一种经过国际验证的算法用于根据死亡原因估计和表征潜在的姑息治疗需求。将此估计值与从基于资金的护理需求评估数据中确定的姑息治疗需求进行比较。
    结果:估计有92%(n=65,949)的人在死亡之前有潜在的姑息治疗需求。其中,19%(n=12,467)被分配了与癌症相关的生命终点轨迹,61%(n=40,511)患有器官衰竭,20%(n=12,971)患有虚弱和痴呆。相比之下,只有6%(n=4430)的居民通过基于资金的护理需求评估被评估为需要姑息治疗.
    结论:超过90%的死于老年护理的人可能受益于姑息治疗方法。基于资金的护理需求评估大大低估了这种需求,它利用了临死时姑息治疗的狭义定义。显然,必须在老年居民护理中区分姑息治疗和临终关怀需求,以确保适当和公平地获得姑息治疗。
    OBJECTIVE: Population-based data on the required needs for palliative care in residential aged care have been highlighted as a key information gap. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive estimate of palliative care needs among Australia\'s residential aged care population using a validated algorithm based on causes of death.
    METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Registry of Senior Australians of non-Indigenous residents of residential aged care services in New South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia aged older than 65 years, who died between 2016 and 2017 (n = 71,677). An internationally validated algorithm was used to estimate and characterise potential palliative care needs based on causes of death. This estimate was compared to palliative care needs identified from funding-based care needs assessment data.
    RESULTS: Ninety two per cent (n = 65,949) were estimated to have had potential palliative care needs prior to their death. Of these, 19% (n = 12,467) were assigned an end-of-life trajectory related to cancer, 61% (n = 40,511) to organ failure and 20% (n = 12,971) to frailty and dementia. By comparison, only 6% (n = 4430) of residents were assessed as needing palliative care by the funding-based care needs assessment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Over 90% of individuals dying in residential aged care may have benefited from a palliative approach to care. This need is substantially underestimated by the funding-based care needs assessment, which utilises a narrow definition of palliative care when death is imminent. There is a clear imperative to distinguish between palliative and end-of-life care needs within residential aged care to ensure appropriate and equitable access to palliative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:吸引和支持可持续的长期护理(LTC)劳动力一直是全球持续的社会政策挑战。为了更好地吸引和留住可持续的LTC劳动力,有必要采用统一的工人福祉概念。工作的意义是一个重要的心理资源,缓冲不利的工作条件对工人的动机的负面影响,满意,和离职意向。这项研究的目的是探讨老年人护理工作的积极意义及其对医疗保健工作者的工作满意度和在LTC部门工作的动机的影响。
    方法:这项研究采用了定性的描述性设计,特别关注卫生保健工作者;例如护士,个人护理人员;作为东亚城市LTC社区中护理工作含义制定和重组的积极代理人。对香港LTC社区的三十名医护人员进行了深入的半结构化访谈。数据分析采用主题分析。
    结果:研究结果表明,尽管医护人员执行苛刻的护理工作并经历外部限制,他们积极构建与老年人一起护理工作的积极意义,作为帮助他们促进老年人舒适衰老的职业,建立情感关系,实现职业认同,并获得工作保障。
    结论:这项定性研究探讨了卫生保健工作者如何协商老年人护理工作的积极意义以及有意义的工作对LTC部门工人的工作满意度和工作动机的影响。提出了文化敏感观点在研究和制定社会政策干预方面的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: Attracting and supporting a sustainable long-term care (LTC) workforce has been a persistent social policy challenge across the globe. To better attract and retain a sustainable LTC workforce, it is necessary to adopt a unified concept of worker well-being. Meaning of work is an important psychological resource that buffers the negative impacts of adverse working conditions on workers\' motivation, satisfaction, and turnover intention. The aim of this study was to explore the positive meaning of care work with older people and its implications for health care workers\' job satisfaction and motivation to work in the LTC sector.
    METHODS: This study adopted a qualitative descriptive design that pays particular attention to health care workers; such as nurses, personal care workers; as active agents of the meaning making and reframing of care work in LTC communities in a East Asia city. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with thirty health care workers in LTC communities in Hong Kong. Thematic analysis was employed for data analysis.
    RESULTS: The research findings indicate that while health care workers perform demanding care work and experience external constraints, they actively construct positive meanings of care work with older people as a helping career that enables them to facilitate the comfortable aging of older people, build affectional relationships, achieve professional identity, and gain job security.
    CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative study explores how health care workers negotiate the positive meaning of older people care work and the implications of meaningful work for workers\' job satisfaction and motivation to work in the LTC sector. The importance of a culturally sensitive perspective in researching and developing social policy intervention are suggested.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在社区环境中,老年人群的衰弱减少和逆转已得到成功解决。然而,这些发现可能不适用于住宅护理环境,很大程度上是由于条件的复杂性和多维性。相对而言,在住宅环境中,很少有预防脆弱的尝试。这篇综述旨在确定和描述解决住宿护理环境中老年人群虚弱问题的最佳护理实践模式。这项研究还探讨了多学科卫生服务提供模式对健康结果的影响,如死亡率,住院治疗,生活质量,跌倒和虚弱。
    方法:对文献进行范围审查以解决项目目标。纳入研究的参考清单,系统搜索书目数据库和灰色文献,寻找报告多学科的文献,脆弱护理的多维模型。
    结果:范围审查未发现符合纳入标准的干预措施。在筛选的704篇文章中,664人被排除为不相关。40篇文章得到了充分评估,虽然没有找到合格的研究,相关数据来自10项接近符合条件的研究,这些研究报告单学科或单维度,而非护理模型.物理,营养,药用,已经讨论了接近符合条件的研究的社会和认知方面,这些研究在减少虚弱或预防护理模式中起着关键作用。
    结论:本综述发现,解决和减少住宅护理环境中的虚弱的干预措施很少。为了解决这一知识差距,需要进行高质量的研究,以研究解决住宅护理设施中脆弱的新型护理模式。同样,有必要开发和验证适当的筛查和评估工具,以预防住院护理人群的脆弱性。卫生服务提供者和政策制定者还应提高对脆弱作为一种动态和可逆状况的认识。虽然年龄是虚弱的不可修改的预测指标,通过全面的护理模式解决可改变的因素可能有助于管理和预防身体,人口老龄化的脆弱对社会和金融的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Frailty reduction and reversal have been addressed successfully among older populations within community settings. However, these findings may not be applicable to residential care settings, largely due to the complex and multidimensional nature of the condition. Relatively, few attempts at frailty prevention exist in residential settings. This review aims to identify and describe best practice models of care for addressing frailty among older populations in residential care settings. This research also sets out to explore the impact of multidisciplinary health service delivery models on health outcomes such as mortality, hospitalisations, quality of life, falls and frailty.
    METHODS: A scoping review of the literature was conducted to address the project objectives. Reference lists of included studies, bibliographic databases and the grey literature were systematically searched for literature reporting multidisciplinary, multidimensional models of care for frailty.
    RESULTS: The scoping review found no interventions that met the inclusion criteria. Of the 704 articles screened, 664 were excluded as not relevant. Forty articles were fully assessed, and while no eligible studies were found, relevant data were extracted from 10 near-eligible studies that reported single disciplines or single dimensions rather than a model of care. The physical, nutritional, medicinal, social and cognitive aspects of the near eligible studies have been discussed as playing a key role in frailty reduction or prevention care models.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review has identified a paucity of interventions for addressing and reducing frailty in residential care settings. High-quality studies investigating novel models of care for addressing frailty in residential care facilities are required to address this knowledge gap. Similarly, there is a need to develop and validate appropriate screening and assessment tools for frailty in residential care populations. Health service providers and policy-makers should also increase their awareness of frailty as a dynamic and reversible condition. While age is a non-modifiable predictor of frailty, addressing modifiable factors through comprehensive care models may help manage and prevent the physical, social and financial impacts of frailty in the ageing population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在老年患者的护理中,推荐以人为中心的药物。然而,护理院居民和亲属参与药物治疗过程在常规护理中仍然有限.因此,我们旨在开发一种复杂的干预措施,重点是住院医师和相关人员的参与以及跨专业沟通,以支持在养老院环境中以人为中心的医学。
    方法:开发于2021年10月至2022年3月在奥胡斯市进行,丹麦。该研究遵循医学研究委员会关于复杂干预发展的指导,以证据为基础,和伙伴关系方法。患者参与工具,积极参与药物审查的患者准备工作(PREPAIR),包括在初步干预模型中。研究活动包括开发计划理论,参与利益相关者,通过采访探索关键的不确定性,联合生产车间,并与最终用户进行测试,以制定干预措施和实施策略。使用了实施研究的综合框架和跨专业共享决策模型。使用快速分析方法分析数据。
    结果:在研讨会之前,六名居民和四名亲属接受了采访。根据他们的反馈,PREPAIR被修改为PrePAIR养老院,以适应养老院人口。总的来说,十人参加了联合制作讲习班,包括卫生保健专业人员和市政管理和质量改进人员。开发的干预原型对三名居民进行了测试,随后进行了最终干预,包括两个固定组件(PREPAIR疗养院和一个跨专业的药物沟通模板)在一个灵活的三阶段的工作流程交付。此外,形成了一个多部分的实施战略。根据发达的计划理论,该干预措施支持卫生保健专业人员对居民和相关参与的认识.它提供了参与的结构,授权居民发言,通过对话带来了新的见解,从而支持参与药物相关决策。最后的干预被认为是相关的,可接受,在养老院环境中也是可行的。
    结论:我们的结果表明,最终干预可能是通过居民和相关参与促进以人为本的医学的可行方法。这将在计划的可行性研究中进一步探讨。
    BACKGROUND: Person-centred medicine is recommended in the care of older patients. Yet, involvement of care home residents and relatives in medication processes remains limited in routine care. Therefore, we aimed to develop a complex intervention focusing on resident and relative involvement and interprofessional communication to support person-centred medicine in the care home setting.
    METHODS: The development took place from October 2021 to March 2022 in the Municipality of Aarhus, Denmark. The study followed the Medical Research Council guidance on complex intervention development using a combination of theoretical, evidence-based, and partnership approaches. The patient involvement tool, the PREparation of Patients for Active Involvement in medication Review (PREPAIR), was included in a preliminary intervention model. Study activities included developing programme theory, engaging stakeholders, and exploring key uncertainties through interviews, co-producing workshops, and testing with end-users to develop the intervention and an implementation strategy. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Interprofessional Shared Decision Making Model were used. Data were analysed using a rapid analysis approach.
    RESULTS: Before the workshops, six residents and four relatives were interviewed. Based on their feedback, PREPAIR was modified to the PREPAIR care home to fit the care home population. In total, ten persons participated in the co-producing workshops, including health care professionals and municipal managerial and quality improvement staff. The developed intervention prototype was tested for three residents and subsequently refined to the final intervention, including two fixed components (PREPAIR care home and an interprofessional medication communication template) delivered in a flexible three-stage workflow. Additionally, a multi-component implementation strategy was formed. In line with the developed programme theory, the intervention supported health care professionals´ awareness about resident and relative involvement. It provided a structure for involvement, empowered the residents to speak, and brought new insights through dialogue, thereby supporting involvement in medication-related decisions. The final intervention was perceived to be relevant, acceptable, and feasible in the care home setting.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the final intervention may be a viable approach to facilitate person-centred medicine through resident and relative involvement. This will be further explored in a planned feasibility study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:寄宿护理和惩教机构中的青少年和年轻人面临各种挑战,导致负面的生活结果。这些机构内部的执行障碍,例如有限的财政和空间资源,对提供必要的支持构成重大障碍。基于网络的方法通过提供具有成本效益的、可访问的解决方案。这项研究旨在评估新开发的基于网络的现有基于证据的STARTNOW技能培训在促进制度化青少年和年轻人的情绪调节和韧性方面的功效。我们介绍了该试验的研究方案(第5版,2023年8月),标题为“实施从现在开始的技能培训的电子版,以促进住院青年护理和惩教机构的情绪调节和韧性”。
    方法:这项研究是单中心的,prospective,对150名需要提高复原力的住院青少年和年轻成年人进行验证性随机对照试验(预定义的界限).参与机构将被随机分为以下三个条件之一:(i)在主持人的指导下进行为期9周的基于网络的团体培训,(ii)为期9周的网络自助培训,(iii)及照常治疗。主要终点是心理灵活性的变化,通过青少年得分的回避和融合问卷进行评估,技能培训后从基线到随访12周。次要目标包括评估参与青少年的心理灵活性和其他与心理健康相关的结果指标的事后变化,年轻人,和从基线开始的看护人,在培训后,以及12周和24周的随访。
    结论:这项研究评估了STARTNOW作为制度化青少年和年轻人的网络培训的有效性,为基于网络的干预提供有价值的见解,并旨在优化支持水平。试验注册{2A和2B}:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05313581。2022年4月6日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults in residential care and correctional institutions face various challenges, leading to negative life outcomes. Implementation barriers within these institutions, such as limited financial and spatial resources, pose significant hurdles to providing necessary support. Web-based approaches address these challenges by offering cost-effective, accessible solutions. This study aims to assess the efficacy of a newly developed web-based version of the existing evidence-based START NOW skills training in fostering emotion regulation and resilience among institutionalized adolescents and young adults. We present the study protocol (Version 5, August 2023) of the trial titled \"Implementation of an e-version of the skills training START NOW for promoting emotion regulation and resilience in residential youth care and correctional institutions\".
    METHODS: The study is a monocentric, prospective, confirmatory randomized controlled trial with 150 institutionalized adolescents and young adults with a need to improve resilience (predefined cut-offs). Participating institutions will be randomized to one of three conditions: (i) 9-week web-based group training guided by a facilitator, (ii) 9-week web-based self-help training, (iii) and treatment as usual. The primary endpoint is the change in psychological flexibility, assessed by the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth score, from baseline to follow-up 12 weeks post skills training. Secondary objectives encompass assessing pre-post changes in psychological flexibility and other psychological health-related outcome measures in participating adolescents, young adults, and caretakers from baseline, to post training, and to 12- and 24-week follow-ups.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluates the efficacy of START NOW as web-based training for institutionalized adolescents and young adults, providing valuable insights into web-based interventions and aiming to optimize support levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION {2A AND 2B}: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05313581. Registered on 6 April 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:攻击性和自我伤害等具有挑战性的行为对住院护理的客户和工作人员来说是危险的。这些行为没有得到很好的理解,因此经常被标记为“复杂”。然而,这种所谓的复杂性在个人层面上的含义仍然模糊。本案例研究采用了三步混合方法分析策略,受到复杂系统理论的启发。首先,我们解释了她日常生活中相关因素的整体总结。第二,我们通过确定稳定阶段来描述她具有挑战性的行为轨迹.第三,她的环境中的不稳定性和异常事件被评估为不同阶段之间的潜在变化诱导机制.
    方法:一个女人,住在一个住宅设施,诊断为轻度智力障碍和边缘性人格障碍,表现出攻击性和自我伤害事件的慢性模式。她每天使用生态瞬时评估对560天的挑战行为进行自我评估。
    结论:对看护者记录的定性总结揭示了许多与她日常生活相关的内部和环境因素。她的临床医生将这些范围缩小到11名员工假设的风险和保护因素,比如重温创伤,经历疼痛,接受医疗护理或赞美。强制性措施增加了第二天挑战行为的机会,而心理治疗会减少第二天自我伤害的机会。这11个因素与自我报告的挑战性行为之间的大多数同期和滞后关联是不显著的,表明挑战性行为不受单一因果关系的支配,谈到它的复杂性。尽管存在这种复杂性,但事件的时间顺序还是存在模式。在560天中,分别发生了13%和50%的攻击和自我伤害。在此时间表上,确定了11个不同的稳定阶段,这些阶段在四个独特状态之间交替:高水平的侵略和自我伤害,平均侵略和自我伤害,低攻击性和自我伤害,低攻击性和高自伤。十个阶段之间的过渡中有八个是由她的环境中的非凡事件触发的,或者在她的自我评价波动加剧之前,或者这两者的组合。理想的模式出现更频繁,不太容易延展,表明当她经历糟糕的时候,记住未来会有更好的时代是充满希望和现实的。
    BACKGROUND: Challenging behaviors like aggression and self-injury are dangerous for clients and staff in residential care. These behaviors are not well understood and therefore often labeled as \"complex\". Yet it remains vague what this supposed complexity entails at the individual level. This case-study used a three-step mixed-methods analytical strategy, inspired by complex systems theory. First, we construed a holistic summary of relevant factors in her daily life. Second, we described her challenging behavioral trajectory by identifying stable phases. Third, instability and extraordinary events in her environment were evaluated as potential change-inducing mechanisms between different phases.
    METHODS: A woman, living at a residential facility, diagnosed with mild intellectual disability and borderline personality disorder, who shows a chronic pattern of aggressive and self-injurious incidents. She used ecological momentary assessments to self-rate challenging behaviors daily for 560 days.
    CONCLUSIONS: A qualitative summary of caretaker records revealed many internal and environmental factors relevant to her daily life. Her clinician narrowed these down to 11 staff hypothesized risk- and protective factors, such as reliving trauma, experiencing pain, receiving medical care or compliments. Coercive measures increased the chance of challenging behavior the day after and psychological therapy sessions decreased the chance of self-injury the day after. The majority of contemporaneous and lagged associations between these 11 factors and self-reported challenging behaviors were non-significant, indicating that challenging behaviors are not governed by mono-causal if-then relations, speaking to its complex nature. Despite this complexity there were patterns in the temporal ordering of incidents. Aggression and self-injury occurred on respectively 13% and 50% of the 560 days. On this timeline 11 distinct stable phases were identified that alternated between four unique states: high levels of aggression and self-injury, average aggression and self-injury, low aggression and self-injury, and low aggression with high self-injury. Eight out of ten transitions between phases were triggered by extraordinary events in her environment, or preceded by increased fluctuations in her self-ratings, or a combination of these two. Desirable patterns emerged more often and were less easily malleable, indicating that when she experiences bad times, keeping in mind that better times lie ahead is hopeful and realistic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    支持人员是提供住宿老年人护理的核心,但是劳动力正面临着日益增长的工作需求和广泛的短缺。这导致了高的倦怠率,工作满意度下降,员工流失率高。据报道,同伴主导的干预措施是有效的,但有必要使用基于证据的干预措施来支持这一关键劳动力群体。
    这项研究旨在评估科学证据,以改善老年护理支持工作者的心理社会和离职相关结果的策略的有效性,这些策略可以纳入同伴主导的干预措施。
    实验和准实验研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
    老年护理。
    使用MEDLINE(通过PubMed)进行了系统的文献综述,EMBASE(通过Scopus),和CINAHL(通过EBSCO)。我们纳入了旨在降低老年护理支持工作者的离职率和/或改善其与工作相关的心理社会结果(例如工作压力,工作满意度,自尊,和其他)。使用混合效应模型进行了许多荟萃分析,以计算标准化的平均差和优势比。
    包括51项研究:15项随机对照试验(RCT),19个非随机对照试验和17个Pre-Post研究。大多数研究被评为“高”或“非常高的偏倚风险”。这些研究按干预类型进行了聚类:1)基于知识的,2)人际交往能力为主,3)团队建设,4)自我照顾。基于知识的干预是最常用的方法,在这一类别中有26项研究,并经常报告压力和满意度相关结果的改善。有12项基于人际交往技能的干预措施和9项团队建设干预措施,经常报告工作压力下降,人员流动,并打算退出。有四种自我护理干预措施,其中只有一种报告了压力相关结果的改善。Meta分析显示,只有以知识为基础的干预措施在统计学上显着改善:较低的员工流失率(OR0.47,95CI:0.37,060),工作/生活满意度(SMD0.26,95%CI:0.05,0.46)和员工态度(SMD0.23,95%CI:0.05,0.45)得分较高。
    这篇综述发现了许多策略,这些策略已经过尝试,以改善支持工作者的心理社会和离职相关结果。大多数研究报告结果有所改善。然而,我们的荟萃分析表明,效应大小很小,而且大多不显著,证据的确定性很低。基于知识的干预措施有效性的证据似乎最有说服力,报告的周转率有统计学上的显著改善,工作/生活满意度和员工态度。需要更多高质量的研究来巩固现有的证据。
    CRD42017059007;2017年6月2日。Tweetable摘要:基于知识的干预措施最有希望改善老年护理支持工作者的结果。#老年护理#员工流动。
    UNASSIGNED: Support workers are central to the delivery of residential aged care, but the workforce is facing increasing work demands and widespread shortages. This contributes to high rates of burnout, decreased job satisfaction and high staff turnover. Peer-led interventions are reported to be effective but it is necessary to use evidence-based interventions to support this key workforce group.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to evaluate the scientific evidence on effectiveness of strategies improving psychosocial and turnover-related outcomes for support workers in aged care that could be incorporated into a peer-led intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic review and meta-analyses of experimental and quasi-experimental studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Residential aged care.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (via Scopus), and CINAHL (via EBSCO). We included studies examining the effectiveness of workplace interventions aiming to reduce aged care support workers\' turnover rates and/or improve their work-related psychosocial outcomes (such as work stress, job satisfaction, self-esteem, and other). A number of meta-analyses using a mixed-effects model were performed to calculate standardized mean differences and odds ratios.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty-one studies were included: 15 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 19 non-RCTs and 17 Pre-Post studies. Most of the studies were rated as having \'high\' or \'very high risk of bias\'. The studies were clustered by intervention type: 1) knowledge-based, 2) interpersonal skills-based, 3) team-building, and 4) self-care. Knowledge-based interventions were the most used approach, with 26 studies in this category, and frequently reported improvements in stress- and satisfaction-related outcomes. There were twelve interpersonal skills-based and nine team-building interventions, which often reported decreased work stress, staff turnover, and intention to quit. There were four self-care interventions of which only one reported improvements in stress-related outcomes. Meta-analyses showed that only knowledge-based interventions resulted in statistically significant improvements: lower staff turnover rates (OR 0.47, 95 %CI: 0.37, 060), and higher scores for job/life satisfaction (SMD 0.26, 95 % CI: 0.05, 0.46) and staff attitude (SMD 0.23, 95 % CI: 0.05, 0.45).
    UNASSIGNED: This review found numerous strategies that have been trialled to improve support workers\' psychosocial- and turnover-related outcomes. Most studies reported improvements in outcomes. However, our meta-analyses suggest that the effect sizes were small and mostly non-significant, with the evidence being of low certainty. The evidence for effectiveness of knowledge-based interventions appears the most convincing, with statistically significant improvements reported for turnover rates, job/life satisfaction and staff attitude. More high-quality studies are needed to consolidate the existing evidence.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42017059007; 02 June 2017.Tweetable abstract: Knowledge-based interventions most promising in improving support workers\' outcomes in aged care. #agedcare #staffturnover.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    步态速度和定时上升(TUG)预测认知能力下降,falls,和死亡率。双重任务可能在痴呆症患者(PWD)的认知筛查中有用,但需要更多的证据.这项横断面研究旨在比较单任务和双任务表现,并确定痴呆严重程度对双任务表现和干扰的影响。在两个住宅护理设施中的30名PWD(年龄:81.3±7.1岁;蒙特利尔认知评估:10.4±6.0分)完成了两项单任务姿势(双脚分开)和双任务姿势(向后计数时双脚分开)的试验,单(步行4m)和双任务步态(在命名单词时步行4m),和单-(定时上行(TUG)),以及带有APDM惯性传感器的双任务功能移动性(完成类别任务时的TUG)。双重任务导致更大的摇摆频率,混蛋,和摇摆区域;步态速度较慢;双肢支撑较大;步幅较短;中摆高度降低;TUG持续时间较长;转弯角度减小;转弯速度比单任务慢(ps<0.05)。双任务表现受到影响(双肢支撑减少,更大的中间摆动高程),和双重任务干扰(更大的冲击,与轻度PWD相比,更快的步态速度)与中度至重度相关。与轻度PWD相比,中度至重度PWD的动态稳定性较差,并且在双重任务中适当选择谨慎步态的能力降低,表明双重任务对认知筛查的有用性。
    Gait speed and timed-up-and-go (TUG) predict cognitive decline, falls, and mortality. Dual-tasks may be useful in cognitive screening among people living with dementia (PWD), but more evidence is needed. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare single- and dual-task performance and determine the influence of dementia severity on dual-task performance and interference. Thirty PWD in two residential care facilities (Age: 81.3 ± 7.1 years; Montreal Cognitive Assessment: 10.4 ± 6.0 points) completed two trials of single- (feet apart) and dual-task posture (feet apart while counting backward), single- (walk 4 m) and dual-task gait (walk 4m while naming words), and single- (timed-up-and-go (TUG)), and dual-task functional mobility (TUG while completing a category task) with APDM inertial sensors. Dual-tasks resulted in greater sway frequency, jerk, and sway area; slower gait speed; greater double limb support; shorter stride length; reduced mid-swing elevation; longer TUG duration; reduced turn angle; and slower turn velocity than single-tasks (ps < 0.05). Dual-task performance was impacted (reduced double limb support, greater mid-swing elevation), and dual-task interference (greater jerk, faster gait speed) was related to moderate-to-severe compared to mild PWD. Moderate-to-severe PWD had poorer dynamic stability and a reduced ability to appropriately select a cautious gait during dual-tasks than those with mild PWD, indicating the usefulness of dual-tasks for cognitive screening.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号