OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to research studies in the literature regarding the role of the occupational therapist within penitentiary facilities.
METHODS: The study design is a systematic review using five different databases.
RESULTS: Findings can therefore ascertain the potential role of occupational therapists in penitentiary institutions because they can contribute to the rehabilitation of prisoners both inside and outside prisons with a view to their reintegration into society.
CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary for clinical practice, and especially to increase the health of people within prisons, to update the occupational therapist interventions in the literature that are effective within prisons.
CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, the intervention of occupational therapists in the prison setting reduces recidivism and contributes to social and work reintegration. This has positive effects in terms of costs related to incarceration.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings can therefore ascertain the potential role of occupational therapists in penitentiary institutions because they can contribute to the rehabilitation of prisoners both inside and outside prisons with a view to their reintegration into society.

The overincarceration of Indigenous peoples and its impacts on individual and community health is a growing concern across Canada and the United States. Federally run Healing Lodges in Canada are an example of support services for incarcerated and previously incarcerated Indigenous peoples to reintegrate into community and support their healing journey. However, there is a need to synthesise research which investigates these programmes. We report a protocol for a scoping review that is guided by the following research question: What is known about culturally informed programmes and services available to incarcerated and previously incarcerated Indigenous peoples in Canada and the US? This scoping review will follow guidelines published by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. This review will only identify programmes that are guided by Indigenous ways of being and knowing in order to best serve Indigenous communities and our community partners. The results of this review will support the development of programmes that are necessary for understanding and addressing the diverse needs of incarcerated and previously incarcerated Indigenous peoples.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are now well-established tools to evaluate the quality of patient-centred care. Due to the multi-faceted and multi-disciplinary nature of the practice of burn care, as well as the range of significant potential sequelae, PROM\'s should form a fundamental component of burn quality improvement programs. We aim to 1. Explore biological, psychological, and social considerations that are currently listed in burn-specific PROM tools, as well as their efficacy, 2. Evaluate biological, psychological, and social factors that are considered in new burn-specific PROM tools or those under development, and 3. Identify any opportunities with respect to burn-specific PROM tools, in order to inform future investigation in this area.
A search was performed of MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases. Two independent reviewers screened article titles/abstracts and then the full texts using Covidence. All studies were graded independently according to the Quality Rating Scheme for Studies and Other Evidences.
The initial search yielded 552 references. Based on ab initio inclusion and exclusion criteria, 133 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility, and 21 articles were ultimately included in the systematic review. Due to study heterogeneity, a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Existing burn-specific PROMs covered a range of biological, psychological, and social factors affecting adult and paediatric patients with burn injury, but several studies required additional PROMs for a thorough evaluation. Burn-specific PROM tools under development are poised to fill this deficit.
Major burn injuries are a unique form of trauma, requiring coordinated management that considers numerous factors not relevant to other patient populations. Further research is necessary to validate existing burn-specific PROM tools and to develop more comprehensive burn-specific PROM measures that more comprehensively incorporate the bio-psycho-social model of health.

BACKGROUND: People released from prison experience complex health challenges in addition to challenges resettling into the community. Consequently, employment rates are low. Participating in good quality employment can support good health and is protective against future reoffending. Multiple interventions are provided to support people into employment on release. The effectiveness of interventions for improving employment outcomes has not previously been evaluated in a meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the effectiveness of interventions to improve employment following release from prison.
METHODS: We searched seven databases and three trial registries for peer reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs), published since 2010, that included adults and measured an employment outcome(s). We conducted meta-analysis using random effects models with sub-group and sensitivity analyses. We appraised bias risk per outcome, and incorporated this into an assessment of the certainty estimates for each outcome. A group of people with experience of imprisonment met with us throughout the project to inform our search strategy and interpretation of results.
RESULTS: We included 12 RCTs (2,875 participants) which were all conducted in the USA. Few outcomes were of low risk of bias. Intervention participants were 2.5 times more likely to work at least one day (95% CI:1.82-3.43) and worked more days over 12 months (MD = 59.07, 95% CI:15.83-102.32) compared to controls. There was no effect on average employment status or employment at study end. There is moderate certainty in these estimates.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions can improve some employment outcomes for people released from prison. More evidence is required to establish effective interventions for sustaining quality employment, particularly outside the USA, and which consider outcomes for different groups of people released, such as women or those with health or substance use needs.

Obstetric fistula continues to affect the social and mental wellbeing of women living in Nigeria giving rise to poor maternal health outcome. While the World Health Organisation (WHO) has recommended the introduction of psycho-social interventions in the management of obstetric fistula women, psycho-social support for women living with obstetric fistula in Nigeria, are limited. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the psycho-social impact of obstetric fistula on women living in Nigeria as well as the available psycho-social support for these affected women.
Following a keyword strategy, Medline, CINAHL, Google scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane library, PsychINFO, AMED, British Nursing database, Pubmed central, TRIP database, UK Pubmed central, socINDEX, Annual reviews, ISI Web of Science, Academic search complete, Credo reference, Sage premier and Scopus databases were searched alongside hand searching of articles. The inclusion criteria were set as articles published between 2000 and 2020, on the psychosocial consequences of obstetric fistula in Nigeria. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool was used to appraise the quality of the included studies. The data was extracted and then analysed using narrative synthesis.
620 relevant citations were identified, and 8 studies were included. Women with obstetric fistula, living in Nigeria were found to be ostracised, abandoned by families and friends, stigmatised and discriminated against, which led to depression, loneliness, loss of self-esteem, self-worth and identity. Psycho-social interventions for women who experienced obstetric fistula are not widely available.
There is a need for the introduction of more rehabilitation and reintegration programs across the country. The psychosocial effect of obstetric fistula is significant and should be considered when developing interventions. Further, more research is needed to evaluate the sustainability of psychosocial interventions in Nigeria.

UNASSIGNED: This systematic review explored factors associated with successful reintegration into the community for male offenders and investigated which factors may be causally related to reintegration.
UNASSIGNED: Database searches were conducted in November 2021; a narrative synthesis and associated causal model with directed acyclic graph (DAG) was used to analyse the factors of reintegration.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Risk-Need-Responsivity-based interventions had the strongest evidence for reducing post-release offending. Fourteen good-quality studies met the inclusion criteria. The DAG shows six exposure variables (prison visits, witnessing victimisation, recovery perception, risk assessment, in-prison treatment, and pre-prison health) which link to several post-release outcomes (criminal justice outcomes, drug use, mental health, housing, and reintegration barriers) and confounding variables (demographics, offending history, prior reintegration barriers, substance misuse and attitudes).
UNASSIGNED: The review identified factors that may be causally related to reintegration for male offenders and warrant further empirical investigation.

Sexual violence is a phenomenon that negatively impacts the victims\' physical and psychological health and well-being. Sex offenders tend not to take responsibility for their actions, have difficulties in emotion regulation and impulse control, paraphilias or other disorders, so they are a difficult group to treat. In addition, the available psychological treatment programs tend to have inconsistent and, sometimes, undesirable results. This systematic review aimed to analyse the recidivism rates of sex offenders treated in community settings. According to the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search in three databases, EBSCOhost, PubMed, and Web of Science, and a manual search was performed. A total of 319 empirical studies using quantitative methodologies were identified, 27 of which were selected for full-text analysis. In the end, 15 studies were included, published between 1996 and 2020. The objectives, intervention approach, instruments used, and the main results and conclusions were extracted from each study. The studies explored different types of sex offenders, such as: violent sex offenders (e.g., rapists), child abusers, and child abusers with pedophilia (and/or other paraphilias). Results showed that most of the programs had a cognitive-behavioral approach (n = 13). Overall, the interventions appear to be effective in reducing recidivism rates, and some of them led to improvements in other outcomes, such as cognitive distortions, accepting responsibility, victim awareness and empathy, emotional regulation, and offense supportive attitudes. Limitations and implications for future studies were discussed.

This rapid review aimed to identify the strategies used to (re)integrate essential caregivers (ECs) into the LTC setting, particularly pertaining to principles of equity, diversity, and inclusion. In addition, this rapid review aimed to identify the strategies used during prior infectious disease threats, when similar blanket visitor restrictions were implemented in LTC homes. The review was part of a larger effort to support LTC homes in Ontario.
A rapid review was conducted in accordance with principles from the Canadian National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools.
ECs, residents, staff, and policy decision makers in long-term care home settings.
Five electronic databases were searched for academic and gray literature using predefined search terms. Selected documents met inclusion criteria if they included policy guidance or an intervention to (re)integrate ECs into LTC homes at the local, national, and/or international level.
In total, 15 documents met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All documents retrieved focused on the context of COVID-19. Documents were either policy guidance (n = 13) or primary research studies (n = 2). Documents differed in these notable ways: Definition of EC; the degree to which an EC is recognized for her or his role in the care of the resident; the degree to which ECs are (re)integrated into the LTC setting is prioritized; response to community spread of COVID-19; visitation during an outbreak or if a resident is symptomatic; the reliance on equity, diversity, and inclusion principles; and lastly, monitoring and improving the process.
Using an equity, diversity, and inclusion lens, we posit promising practices for (re)integration. It is clear from the rapid review that more research is needed to understand the efficacy of policies and guidelines to (re)integrate ECs into the LTC setting. Until such evidence is available, expert opinion will drive best care practices.

BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, a scoping review of the published literature investigating the determinants of adult stroke survivors\' reintegration to normal living has not been conducted. This scoping review aims to critically review the evidence investigating reintegration to normal living following a stroke. The following questions on reintegration to normal living after stroke will pivot this review: (i) what factors are associated with returning to normal living of stroke survivors? (ii) what are the overall determinants of reintegration to normal living of stroke survivors? To fully understand these questions, we also ask, how is reintegration to normal living assessed throughout stroke literature?
METHODS: A scoping review will be conducted based on the methodology presented by Arksey and O\'Malley and extended by Levac and colleagues. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was adopted to develop the protocol. This study will include studies involving participants ≥ 18 years old, who are stroke survivors reintegrating to normal living in the community. With no time limitations, English language publications and all study designs reporting on reintegration to normal living of stroke survivors\' will be sourced. The abstract and full-text screening will be conducted by two independent reviewers, including data charting. Thematic analysis will be used to align relevant themes and will be presented in a narrative.
CONCLUSIONS: We anticipate that the scoping review will highlight the available resources and evidence on factors that determine reintegration to normal living of stroke survivors. This may contribute to informed empirical evidence for rehabilitation professionals to enhance the functional recovery of stroke survivors. It may also reveal other areas for research into reintegration to normal living for stroke survivors.
UNASSIGNED: The protocol has been registered prospectively on the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/36tuz/ ).

Clinical guidelines recommend a phase-based approach to treatment for complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD), yet little is known about what interventions are being offered and which may be effective in the final \'reintegration\' phase.
To systematically review literature on reintegration interventions for CPTSD, describing the nature and effectiveness of interventions.
We searched four electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and PTSDpubs) for interventions aiming to facilitate reintegration for participants with probable CPTSD. We had two aims: firstly, to describe the interventions and secondly, to describe their effectiveness as measured through measures of reintegration, PTSD and/or disturbances in self-organization (DSO), or qualitative data describing changes experienced. Results are presented using narrative synthesis.
Fifteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Interventions included yoga, exercise, use of service dogs, residential treatment, education, self-defence and patient research involvement. Overall study quality was low, as assessed by critical appraisal tools. Of the six studies including a control group, two reported a statistically significant improvement in the measure of reintegration between the intervention and control group, four studies reported a statistically significant difference in the measure of PTSD symptoms, but none reported any significant differences between intervention and control groups in DSO. Of all eight quantitative studies, three reported a statistically significant difference in the reintegration measure pre- to post-intervention for the intervention group, five a statistically significant improvement in the measure of PTSD symptoms, and three a significant difference in the DSO measure. From eight studies reporting qualitative date we synthesized themes into eight categories, within which facilitation of connection with others was the most commonly reported benefit.
The interventions outlined may facilitate reintegration, however, research in this area is still in its infancy and quality research is lacking. Further research is needed to establish whether reintegration interventions enhance treatment for CPTSD.
Antecedentes: Las guías clínicas recomiendan un enfoque basado en fases para el tratamiento del trastorno de estrés postraumático complejo (TEPTC), aunque se sabe poco acerca de las intervenciones que se ofrecen y cuáles pueden ser efectivas en la fase final de ‘reintegración’.Objetivo: Revisar la literatura en forma sistemática acerca de intervenciones de reintegración para el TEPTC, describiendo la naturaleza y efectividad de las intervenciones.Método: Para las intervenciones cuyo objetivo era facilitar la reintegración de los participantes con probable TEPTC, buscamos en cuatro bases de datos electrónicas (Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, y PTSDpubs). Teníamos dos objetivos: en primer lugar, describir las intervenciones y, en segundo lugar, describir su efectividad medida a través de mediciones de reintegración, TEPT y/o alteraciones en la auto-organización (DSO en sus siglas en ingles), o datos cualitativos que describieran los cambios experimentados. Los resultados se presentan mediante síntesis narrativa.Resultados: Quince estudios reunieron nuestros criterios de inclusión, La intervenciones incluían yoga, ejercicio, uso de perros de servicio, tratamiento residencial, educación, autodefensa y la implicación del paciente en la investigación. La calidad del estudio en general fue baja, según la evaluación de las herramientas de evaluación críticas. De los seis estudios que incluyeron un grupo control, dos reportaron una mejoría estadísticamente significativa en la medición de la reintegración entre la intervención y el grupo control, cuatro estudios reportaron una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la medición de los síntomas de TEPT, pero ninguno reportó alguna diferencia significativa en los síntomas DSO entre los grupos de intervención y control. De los ocho estudios cuantitativos, tres reportaron una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la medición de la reintegración pre y post intervención para el grupo con intervención, cinco una mejoría estadísticamente significativa en la medición de los síntomas de TEPT, y tres una diferencia significativa en la medición de los síntomas DSO. De los ocho estudios que reportaron datos cualitativos los sintetizamos por temas en ocho categorías, dentro de las cuales la facilitación de la conexión con otros fue el beneficio más comúnmente reportado.Conclusiones: Las intervenciones descritas pueden facilitar la reintegración, sin embargo, la investigación en esta área aún está dando sus primeros pasos y se carece investigación de calidad. Se necesita más investigación para establecer si las intervenciones de reintegración mejoran el tratamiento para el TEPTC.
目的:系统地综述CPTSD重新整合干预的文献, 描述干预措施的性质和有效性。方法:我们搜索了四个电子数据库 (Medline, PsycINFO, Embase和PTSDpubs) 以寻找旨在促进可能患有CPTSD的参与者重新整合的干预措施。我们有两个目标:首先, 描述干预措施, 其次, 通过对重新整合, PTSD和/或自组织障碍 (DSO) 的测量或描述经历的变化的定性数据来测量干预措施的有效性。结果使用叙述性综合法呈现。结果:十五项研究符合我们的纳入标准。干预措施包括瑜伽, 锻炼, 使用服务犬, 住院治疗, 教育, 自卫和患者研究参与。通过关键评估工具评估, 总体研究质量较低。在包括对照组的6项研究中, 有2项报告了干预组和对照组之间重新整合测量的改善有统计学显著差异, 有4项研究报告了PTSD症状的测量有统计学显著差异, 但是没有一项报告说干预与对照组之间的DSO有统计学显著差异。在所有8项定量研究中, 3项报告了干预组干预前后的重新整合测量有统计学显著差异, 5项在PTSD症状测量上有统计学显著改善, 3项在DSO测量上有显著差异。从报告定性日期的8项研究中, 我们将主题分为八类, 其中促进与他人联系的类别是最常报告有益处的。.